Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
64,113
In database
Filtered Results
60,361
Matching current filters
Showing Page
55 of 2415
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Recertification:
Recertification:
In eight (8) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the annual recertification was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In eight (8) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the annual recertification was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In eight (8) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Applicant’s/Tenant’s Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In eight (8) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Applicant’s/Tenant’s Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In eight (8) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for Release of Information (Form 9887) was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In eight (8) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for Release of Information (Form 9887) was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the HUD Form-50059 was not signed by the Tenant and Property Manager, until January 2026. The effective date was November 1, 2025.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the HUD Form-50059 was not signed by the Tenant and Property Manager, until January 2026. The effective date was November 1, 2025.
In six (6) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the HUD Form-50059 was not signed by the Tenant and Property Manager, until after the effective date.
In six (6) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the HUD Form-50059 was not signed by the Tenant and Property Manager, until after the effective date.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Form HUD-50059 was not dated by the Owner/Agent.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Form HUD-50059 was not dated by the Owner/Agent.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the HUD-EIV report was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the HUD-EIV report was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Housing quality inspection report was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Housing quality inspection report was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In three (3) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Lease Addendum for Violence Against Women and Justice Department Reauthorization Act of 2005, was not signed by the Tenant, until after the effective date on the Form HUD-50059.
In three (3) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Lease Addendum for Violence Against Women and Justice Department Reauthorization Act of 2005, was not signed by the Tenant, until after the effective date on the Form HUD-50059.
In two (2) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Quality Assurance Information form, was not signed by the Tenant, until after the effective date on the Form HUD-50059.
In two (2) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Quality Assurance Information form, was not signed by the Tenant, until after the effective date on the Form HUD-50059.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Quality Assurance Information form, was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Quality Assurance Information form, was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In three (3) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Non-Smoking Lease Addendum form, was not signed by the Tenant, until after the effective date on the Form HUD-50059.
In three (3) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the Non-Smoking Lease Addendum form, was not signed by the Tenant, until after the effective date on the Form HUD-50059.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the HUD-EIV report had an effective date of December 25, 2025; however, the effective date on the Form HUD-50059 was November 1, 2025.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the HUD-EIV report had an effective date of December 25, 2025; however, the effective date on the Form HUD-50059 was November 1, 2025.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the tenant’s income per the EIV was based on the net social security benefits as opposed to the gross social security benefits. As result, the HUD subsidy was not properly calculated on the Form HUD-50059.
In one (1) instance out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the tenant’s income per the EIV was based on the net social security benefits as opposed to the gross social security benefits. As result, the HUD subsidy was not properly calculated on the Form HUD-50059.
In six (6) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the effective date on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 811 PRAC form, did agree to the effective date on the HUD Form-50059.
In six (6) instances out of ten (10) tenant files tested, the effective date on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 811 PRAC form, did agree to the effective date on the HUD Form-50059.
(1) Estimated Completion Date.
(1) Estimated Completion Date.
2026-10-31 00:00:00
2026-10-31 00:00:00
2. Current Findings on the Schedule of Finding, Questioned Cost and Recommendation
2. Current Findings on the Schedule of Finding, Questioned Cost and Recommendation
b. Finding 2025-008 (14.157 – Supportive Housing for the Elderly – Section 202 Capital Advance)
b. Finding 2025-008 (14.157 – Supportive Housing for the Elderly – Section 202 Capital Advance)
Replacement Reserve
Replacement Reserve
Condition:
Condition:
Unable to verify that the required monthly deposit into the replacement reserve bank account was approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, during the 2025 calendar year.
Unable to verify that the required monthly deposit into the replacement reserve bank account was approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, during the 2025 calendar year.
(1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation.
(1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation.
Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that management should provide the approved documentation, indicating the required monthly deposit into the replacement reserve bank account.
Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that management should provide the approved documentation, indicating the required monthly deposit into the replacement reserve bank account.
« 1 53 54 56 57 2415 »