Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
59,925
In database
Filtered Results
56,707
Matching current filters
Showing Page
56 of 2269
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding 2025-002: Eligibility – Untimely Recertifications Type: Significant Deficiency Condition: During testing of tenant files, the auditor identified fourteen instances in which 2025 annual recertifications were not completed in a timely manner. Recertifications were performed in the subsequent y...
Finding 2025-002: Eligibility – Untimely Recertifications Type: Significant Deficiency Condition: During testing of tenant files, the auditor identified fourteen instances in which 2025 annual recertifications were not completed in a timely manner. Recertifications were performed in the subsequent year, and effective dates were backdated to reflect the current year. Management agrees with the finding and acknowledges the need to strengthen internal controls over tenant file compliance. To address this issue, management will implement a formalized tracking system for annual recertifications to ensure they are completed timely with accurate effective dates. Additionally, supervisory review and approval procedures will be enhanced prior to finalizing tenant rent changes. A. The Compliance Manager will oversee the compliance department and ensure staff complete recertifications prior to required effective dates. B. The Property Manager will conduct weekly meetings with staff to review upcoming recertifications and monitor progress to ensure timeliness. C. Management is in the process of hiring additional staff dedicated to processing recertifications to improve timeliness and compliance. Contact for Corrective Action: Cornelia Reith anticipated Completion date:12/31/26
Finding No.: 2025-005 Condition: The District did not maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. The organization did not ensure that vendors complied with all contract terms, conditions and specifications. Plan: The district is currently running a Food Service Management Comp...
Finding No.: 2025-005 Condition: The District did not maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. The organization did not ensure that vendors complied with all contract terms, conditions and specifications. Plan: The district is currently running a Food Service Management Company bid that complies with the state’s procurement. Anticipated Date of Completion: August 1, 2026 Name of Contact Person: Nicholas Valderas, Business Manager Management Response: See plan above
View of Responsible Officials: Management carried out an after-action review to identify root cause of delays in completing the 2024 audit and timely filing of the single audit report packet. We implemented strict timeline in completing the 2024 year-end financial closing process and accounts reconc...
View of Responsible Officials: Management carried out an after-action review to identify root cause of delays in completing the 2024 audit and timely filing of the single audit report packet. We implemented strict timeline in completing the 2024 year-end financial closing process and accounts reconciliation. An overall Audit Coordinator was appointed and worked closely with the business process leads while Regional and Country Managers helped ensure completion of the 2024 field offices and affiliates audit reports prior to start of the global audit fieldwork. While timely submission of the 2024 Single Audit package remained a high priority, staff bandwidth constraints required additional time to ensure all audit requests were thoroughly supported and addressed. Management is continuing to strengthen processes and coordination mechanisms to improve timeliness going forward, including better workload planning, earlier engagement with key stakeholders, and ongoing monitoring of audit readiness milestones.
Management has established processes and procedures for documenting approvals for ACH transactions.
Management has established processes and procedures for documenting approvals for ACH transactions.
Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee r...
Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter and that all documentation supporting the sliding discount provided is retained. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: These errors are due to incorrect slide percentage amounts being put into eCW. There is also a known issue within eCW where the eCW changes the slide amount to either 100% or a different slide than was entered. The Organization has found a work around so that the Organization can fix this issue before claims are adjusted. Billing will start reviewing slide documents prior to applying slide to make sure that the percentage entered into eCW is correct for income/family size. These will also be reviewed by the front desk manager and lead patient service representative.
Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the approval of federal fund drawdown requests. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disa...
Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the approval of federal fund drawdown requests. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization is in agreement with finding. The control issue was due to turnover in finance staff during fiscal year 2025. Under the direction of the Organization’s new CFO, the following revised procedures for cash management have been implemented for fiscal year 2026: • Payroll Documentation: A staff accountant or the controller will compile payroll expense details along with supporting documentation for each drawdown. • Review and Approval: This documentation is submitted to the CFO for review prior to any fund transfer. • Drawdown Execution: Upon approval, the CFO will initiate the drawdown from PMS. • Frequency: Drawdowns are processed on a biweekly basis and reflect expenses from the preceding payroll cycle. Upon completion of the drawdown, the CFO will save a copy of the drawdown request to the internal drive. • This drawdown receipt is reviewed by a second staff member, either the controller or senior accountant. • Drawdowns are also reviewed during monthly bank reconciliations.
Child Care and Nutrition, Inc. respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended September 30, 2025. Audit period: October 1, 2024-September 30, 2025 The findings from the September 30, 2025 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are nu...
Child Care and Nutrition, Inc. respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended September 30, 2025. Audit period: October 1, 2024-September 30, 2025 The findings from the September 30, 2025 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS – FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT MATERIAL WEAKNESS 2025-001 Internal Accounting Controls Recommendation: We recommend management be aware to the lack of segregation of duties within the accounting functions and provide oversight to ensure the internal control policies and procedures are being implemented by organization staff. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization will continue to review the accounting functions of all affected departments so segregate them as it is cost beneficial. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Sherri Looft, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2026. MATERIAL WEAKNESS 2025-002 Annual Financial Reporting Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Recommendation: Management should continue to evaluate their internal staff capacity to determine if an internal control policy over the annual financial reporting is beneficial. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization understands this is required communications for the preparation of the financial statements and will continue to work at this area to achieve the overall goal. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Sherri Looft, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2026. FINDINGS – FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS 2025-003 Internal Accounting Controls Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Child and Adult Care Food Program CFDA Number: 10.558 Pass Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education, Child Nutrition Section Pass Through Number: 1000003400 Award Periods: Year ended September 30, 2025 Recommendation: We recommend management be aware to the lack of segregation of duties within the accounting functions and provide oversight to ensure the internal control policies and procedures are being implemented by organization staff. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization will continue to review the accounting functions of all affected departments so segregate them as it is cost beneficial. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Sherri Looft, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2026.
Findings (2025-001, 2025-002, 2025-003) Finding: Advance Funds- In accordance with 45 CFR 75.305(b)(1) [refer to “Prepaid Rent” above]. Of the 24 cash advances received, one advance was held for six working days, which is in excess of “immediate cash needs” as outlined in the Uniform Guidance and th...
Findings (2025-001, 2025-002, 2025-003) Finding: Advance Funds- In accordance with 45 CFR 75.305(b)(1) [refer to “Prepaid Rent” above]. Of the 24 cash advances received, one advance was held for six working days, which is in excess of “immediate cash needs” as outlined in the Uniform Guidance and the policy historically observed by the Organization of 72 working hours. Auditor Recommendation: Advance Funds- We recommend that management design and implement formal, written internal control procedures to ensure compliance with cash management requirements. Specifically, management should implement a supervisory review to ensure federal funds are limited to minimum amounts needed for immediate cash requirements as indicated in the Uniform Guidance. Corrective Action: Advance Funds- Internal controls have been updated and there is an additional level for reviewing requests. The Executive Director is provided a list of all funds available after each draw down and the amounts drawn down are matched to the GL and GFR. This responsibility will be transferred to the Deputy Director once the new Fiscal Manager is in place. There is a schedule for the date the funds are allowed to be requested that fall within the 72-hour window posted in the Finance office and the Executive Director is notified before any requests are processed. The current Finance officer is meeting every 2 weeks for training with NDRN and policies, Uniform Guidance, MIP processes, and federal grants are reviewed in these meetings. Timeline: Advance Funds- TA with NDRN: Every 2 weeks starting April 22, 2026. Fiscal Manager: Posting for the position will be up by end of June 2026. 72-Hour Listing: Created and posted 6/1/26 Finding: Payroll Expenses- During our testing of allowable costs, 2 of the 20 time sheets selected did not contain approval signatures. Auditor Recommendation: Payroll Expenses- We recommend that management update its internal control policies to establish formal backup/interim approval authorities. When primary supervisors are out of the office on vacation or leave, a designated alternative official must be authorized to review and approve timesheets timely to ensure the continuity of internal controls. Corrective Action: Payroll Expenses- Payroll review: Payroll packets are reviewed during and after the payroll process to ensure all timesheets are approved and signed off by both the Executive Director and Board of Directors when appropriate. Executive Director’s timesheets and authorizations are presented to the Board of Directors when signing checks for review and approval. Procedures have been updated to include a secondary review of the timesheets at the end of each payroll cycle. Timeline: Payroll Expenses- Payroll review: After every payroll beginning 4/23/26 Finding: Prepaid Rent- As of September 30, 2025, a total of 14 months of rent payments were recognized in the general ledger and had been drawn from the PAIMI program. Total questioned costs related to these prepaid transactions, prepaid at year end, totaled $3,855.80. Auditor Recommendation: Prepaid Rent- We recommend that management design and implement formal, written internal control procedures to ensure compliance with cash management requirements. Specifically, management should implement a supervisory review of all general ledger disbursements against grant draws to ensure federal funds are limited to minimum amounts needed for immediate cash requirements. Corrective Action: Prepaid Rent- We received permission and were encouraged by our federal funders to pre-pay rent. We will not be pre-paying rent going forward. The Executive Director meets weekly with both PADD and PAIMI program managers to review processes. Timeline: Prepaid Rent- PADD and PAIMI program manager meetings: ongoing since before audit. Finding: Program Income- Our testing of allowable costs under the PADD grant identified two specific transactions where expenditures were fully reimbursed by federal funds despite being offset by program income and/or being erroneously drawn. Because these transactions relate to the same journal entry recognized in the general ledger, these are considered isolated instances. Auditor Recommendation: Program Income- We recommend that management design and implement formal, written internal control procedures to identify, track, and account for all program income generated by PADD grant activities within the general ledger. Corrective Action: Program Income- We received confirmation from the federal partners that we should spend the $16,165 legal fees from 2023, in April 2026. Those funds were not drawn down during PPE 4/30/26 and 5/15/26. Timeline: Program Income- $9104 was used to cover the PADD draw down for 4/30/26. No additional funds were drawn down. The remaining $7061 was used to cover part of the funds requested for 5/15/26. Additional funds were requested during the 5/15/26 draw down to cover remaining expenses. Nevada Disability and Law Center 2820 W Charleston Blvd, Suite 11 Las Vegas, NV 89102 EIN: 88-0327392 Jessica Crain, Deputy Director (Jessica@ndalc.org) (702) 257-8150 ext. 7122 phone (702) 257-8170 fax
Findings (2025-001, 2025-002, 2025-003) Finding: Advance Funds- In accordance with 45 CFR 75.305(b)(1) [refer to “Prepaid Rent” above]. Of the 24 cash advances received, one advance was held for six working days, which is in excess of “immediate cash needs” as outlined in the Uniform Guidance and th...
Findings (2025-001, 2025-002, 2025-003) Finding: Advance Funds- In accordance with 45 CFR 75.305(b)(1) [refer to “Prepaid Rent” above]. Of the 24 cash advances received, one advance was held for six working days, which is in excess of “immediate cash needs” as outlined in the Uniform Guidance and the policy historically observed by the Organization of 72 working hours. Auditor Recommendation: Advance Funds- We recommend that management design and implement formal, written internal control procedures to ensure compliance with cash management requirements. Specifically, management should implement a supervisory review to ensure federal funds are limited to minimum amounts needed for immediate cash requirements as indicated in the Uniform Guidance. Corrective Action: Advance Funds- Internal controls have been updated and there is an additional level for reviewing requests. The Executive Director is provided a list of all funds available after each draw down and the amounts drawn down are matched to the GL and GFR. This responsibility will be transferred to the Deputy Director once the new Fiscal Manager is in place. There is a schedule for the date the funds are allowed to be requested that fall within the 72-hour window posted in the Finance office and the Executive Director is notified before any requests are processed. The current Finance officer is meeting every 2 weeks for training with NDRN and policies, Uniform Guidance, MIP processes, and federal grants are reviewed in these meetings. Timeline: Advance Funds- TA with NDRN: Every 2 weeks starting April 22, 2026. Fiscal Manager: Posting for the position will be up by end of June 2026. 72-Hour Listing: Created and posted 6/1/26 Finding: Payroll Expenses- During our testing of allowable costs, 2 of the 20 time sheets selected did not contain approval signatures. Auditor Recommendation: Payroll Expenses- We recommend that management update its internal control policies to establish formal backup/interim approval authorities. When primary supervisors are out of the office on vacation or leave, a designated alternative official must be authorized to review and approve timesheets timely to ensure the continuity of internal controls. Corrective Action: Payroll Expenses- Payroll review: Payroll packets are reviewed during and after the payroll process to ensure all timesheets are approved and signed off by both the Executive Director and Board of Directors when appropriate. Executive Director’s timesheets and authorizations are presented to the Board of Directors when signing checks for review and approval. Procedures have been updated to include a secondary review of the timesheets at the end of each payroll cycle. Timeline: Payroll Expenses- Payroll review: After every payroll beginning 4/23/26 Finding: Prepaid Rent- As of September 30, 2025, a total of 14 months of rent payments were recognized in the general ledger and had been drawn from the PAIMI program. Total questioned costs related to these prepaid transactions, prepaid at year end, totaled $3,855.80. Auditor Recommendation: Prepaid Rent- We recommend that management design and implement formal, written internal control procedures to ensure compliance with cash management requirements. Specifically, management should implement a supervisory review of all general ledger disbursements against grant draws to ensure federal funds are limited to minimum amounts needed for immediate cash requirements. Corrective Action: Prepaid Rent- We received permission and were encouraged by our federal funders to pre-pay rent. We will not be pre-paying rent going forward. The Executive Director meets weekly with both PADD and PAIMI program managers to review processes. Timeline: Prepaid Rent- PADD and PAIMI program manager meetings: ongoing since before audit. Finding: Program Income- Our testing of allowable costs under the PADD grant identified two specific transactions where expenditures were fully reimbursed by federal funds despite being offset by program income and/or being erroneously drawn. Because these transactions relate to the same journal entry recognized in the general ledger, these are considered isolated instances. Auditor Recommendation: Program Income- We recommend that management design and implement formal, written internal control procedures to identify, track, and account for all program income generated by PADD grant activities within the general ledger. Corrective Action: Program Income- We received confirmation from the federal partners that we should spend the $16,165 legal fees from 2023, in April 2026. Those funds were not drawn down during PPE 4/30/26 and 5/15/26. Timeline: Program Income- $9104 was used to cover the PADD draw down for 4/30/26. No additional funds were drawn down. The remaining $7061 was used to cover part of the funds requested for 5/15/26. Additional funds were requested during the 5/15/26 draw down to cover remaining expenses. Nevada Disability and Law Center 2820 W Charleston Blvd, Suite 11 Las Vegas, NV 89102 EIN: 88-0327392 Jessica Crain, Deputy Director (Jessica@ndalc.org) (702) 257-8150 ext. 7122 phone (702) 257-8170 fax
Contact Person Patricia Heraty, Accountant Corrective Action Plan Management plans to review its internal control procedures to ensure a quality control review is performed to verify all required documentation and calculations are maintained in the tenant files. Planned Completion Date for CAP Immed...
Contact Person Patricia Heraty, Accountant Corrective Action Plan Management plans to review its internal control procedures to ensure a quality control review is performed to verify all required documentation and calculations are maintained in the tenant files. Planned Completion Date for CAP Immediately.
Finding 1218168 (2025-001)
Material Weakness 2025
1. Management has implemented a more robust month-end close process, that has resulted in a more timely report submission. 2. Management has reviewed the donor reporting requirements and has discussed them with the donor, leading to a change in frequency and timing of the reporting requirements. 3. ...
1. Management has implemented a more robust month-end close process, that has resulted in a more timely report submission. 2. Management has reviewed the donor reporting requirements and has discussed them with the donor, leading to a change in frequency and timing of the reporting requirements. 3. Management will monitor adherence to reporting deadlines on an ongoing basis.
Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The Board agreed with the finding. The Board implemented procedures to ensure compliance with the U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.318, of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Aw...
Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The Board agreed with the finding. The Board implemented procedures to ensure compliance with the U. S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200.318, of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and the Code of Alabama 1975, Title 39, by conducting training with all personnel. Purchasing Cooperatives will not be used when purchases are under the Public Works Law.
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31-2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2026, 6/30/2 025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & ...
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31-2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2026, 6/30/2 025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the required reports were not sent to the USDA. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should create a checklist to track/remind management to send the required reports to the USDA as well create a monthly electronic calendar reminder Client Response: The facility has submitted the required reports and added items to their monthly checklist and calendar for future reporting periods. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Gra...
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the funds were not deposited for several of the required months and the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account to separate the required funds, and have a review process to verify that the deposits were made properly. Client Response: The Organization has automated a reoccurring ACH that deposits $10,343 into the reserve account every month and funded the balance to the required amount. The bookkeeping company and management have added a reserve account review to their monthly checklist. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31-2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2025, 6/30/2025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & G...
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31-2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2025, 6/30/2025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the required reports were not sent to the USDA. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should create a checklist to track/remind management to send the required reports to the USDA as well create a monthly electronic calendar reminder Client Response: The facility has submitted the required reports and added items to their monthly checklist and calendar for future reporting periods. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Gra...
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the funds were not deposited for several of the required months and the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account to separate the required funds, and have a review process to verify that the deposits were made properly. Client Response: The Organization has automated a reoccurring ACH that deposits $10,343 into the reserve account every month and funded the balance to the required amount. The bookkeeping company and management have added a reserve account review to their monthly checklist. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Management recognized the importance of timely bank reconciliations and accurate financial reporting. The District has implemented procedures requiring all bank reconciliations to be completed and reviewed within 30 days of month-end. A reconciliation checklist has been established to ensure all bal...
Management recognized the importance of timely bank reconciliations and accurate financial reporting. The District has implemented procedures requiring all bank reconciliations to be completed and reviewed within 30 days of month-end. A reconciliation checklist has been established to ensure all balance sheet accounts are reviewed and reconciled monthly. Management will also perform periodic reviews of the general ledger throughout the year to identify and correct discrepancies before year-end. In addition, the District will provide additional training to accounting personnel regarding month-end closing procedures and financial reporting requirements.
Management recognized the importance of timely bank reconciliations and accurate financial reporting. The District has implemented procedures requiring all bank reconciliations to be completed and reviewed within 30 days of month-end. A reconciliation checklist has been established to ensure all bal...
Management recognized the importance of timely bank reconciliations and accurate financial reporting. The District has implemented procedures requiring all bank reconciliations to be completed and reviewed within 30 days of month-end. A reconciliation checklist has been established to ensure all balance sheet accounts are reviewed and reconciled monthly. Management will also perform periodic reviews of the general ledger throughout the year to identify and correct discrepancies before year-end. In addition, the District will provide additional training to accounting personnel regarding month-end closing procedures and financial reporting requirements.
Recommendation: We recommend that the college review its processes and internal controls related to SAP and ensure procedures are in place to ensure students who are not meeting SAP requirements are properly identified and disbursed aid in accordance with the institution’s SAP policy. Explanation of...
Recommendation: We recommend that the college review its processes and internal controls related to SAP and ensure procedures are in place to ensure students who are not meeting SAP requirements are properly identified and disbursed aid in accordance with the institution’s SAP policy. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Since December 2025, the College has worked with the SIS Managed Services team (Anthology now Ellucian) to update its SAP policy and ensure compliance with federal regulations. The new SAP policy was fully implemented effective during the Winter 2026 term. As an internal control, at the end of each term when SAP is evaluated, the results are pre-screened by the Coordinator of Financial Aid with oversight from the Director of Financial Aid to ensure accuracy before results are posted live in the system. Additionally, the College has clarified its understanding of Anthology’s treatment of students who are newly enrolled at the College or who have changed into a different program version. These students are designated with a not-calculated SAP which represents a blank or null status until the conclusion of the term when the students receive a passing or failing grade and can be evaluated by the SAP standards. Steps also have been taken to ensure that prior enrollments are linked to ensure integrity of the application of SAP standards based on the cumulative pace, GPA and maximum timeframe. As a further measure to ensure the integrity of awarding Title IV funds only to eligible students, the College has placed students with prior ineligible SAP statuses in a hold group within the SIS and identified these students as not meeting Disbursement Approval Criteria (DAC) thus causing any attempt to disburse funds to them to fail. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Sarajane Viemeister and Denise Reid-Strachan. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2027.
Recommendation: We recommend the College changes its process and controls to ensure exit counseling emails are sent to graduate/withdrawn students throughout the year. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding...
Recommendation: We recommend the College changes its process and controls to ensure exit counseling emails are sent to graduate/withdrawn students throughout the year. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Since August 2025, the College has taken steps in conjunction with its SIS Managed Services team (Anthology) to establish an automated process to notify graduate/withdrawn students to complete the Exit Counseling requirement. Since then the Director of Financial Aid has been spot-checking the notifications to ensure that the exit counseling notification is being triggered for withdrawn students. Going forward, the Financial Aid Office will use the Task Function in Anthology to confirm that the notification has been sent and close the task which will be timestamped with the name of the reviewer. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Sarajane Viemeister and Denise Reid-Strachan. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2027.
Recommendation: We recommend the college review its process and procedures for R2T4 calculations to ensure they are in line with Dept. of Education requirements. We also recommend the college maintain evidence of the formal review process that ensures Return of Title IV calculations are being perfor...
Recommendation: We recommend the college review its process and procedures for R2T4 calculations to ensure they are in line with Dept. of Education requirements. We also recommend the college maintain evidence of the formal review process that ensures Return of Title IV calculations are being performed timely and correctly to minimize the likelihood that errors may go undetected and not corrected in a timely manner. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The College will ensure that all Financial Aid policies and procedures are up-to-date; reviewed annually; and revised, as needed. Documentation will also be made for any procedures that are currently being performed by their third-party-servicer, Global including Return to Title IV (R2T4) calculations. As an internal control, the Financial Aid Office will retain records of the Return to Title IV calculations performed by Global; sign-off on the appropriate reports with the date reviewed; include the initials of the Coordinator of Financial Aid and co-signed by the Director of Financial Aid. The Coordinator of Financial Aid will notify Global of funds to be returned by the institution and/or student by completing the established process (GARP) to ensure that the funds are returned to the Department of Education within 45 days of the Date of Determination. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Sarajane Viemeister and Denise Reid-Strachan. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2027.
Recommendation: We recommend the College review internal control reports and implement review controls for work performed by third-party servicers. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Currently, CGCC re...
Recommendation: We recommend the College review internal control reports and implement review controls for work performed by third-party servicers. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Currently, CGCC reviews several weekly reports from its third-party servicer, Global Financial Aid Services which indicates the actions which could not be completed by Global due to missing information, etc. These reports are discussed during the weekly call between Global and CGCC at which time steps are taken to resolve outstanding issues. CGCC also has access to other Financial Aid (FA) Reports in the Global Administration portal including verification, resolution of C-Flags and Unusual/Special Circumstances reviews which are conducted by Global. Going forward, the Financial Aid Office will review these reports monthly to ensure that the students are awarded and their funds disbursed in a timely fashion. As an internal control, documentation of the review of the FA reports will be retained, signed and dated by the Coordinator of Financial Aid and co-signed by the Director of Financial Aid. To further ensure integrity in the administration and awarding of Title IV funds, CGCC will annually request an SSAE 18 Report from Global in October of each year and subsequently, where applicable, a Bridge Letter to cover the intervening period between reports. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Sarajane Viemeister and Denise Reid-Strachan. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2027.
Recommendation: We recommend the college review current processes and procedures for NSLDS enrollment reporting and retain evidence of an internal control that ensures timely and accurate reporting being performed. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the aud...
Recommendation: We recommend the college review current processes and procedures for NSLDS enrollment reporting and retain evidence of an internal control that ensures timely and accurate reporting being performed. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: During the past year, the College (CGCC) has worked vigorously to bring NSLDS enrollment reporting up-to-date. The College currently reports enrollment data to NSLDS through the National Student Clearinghouse. The Registrar annually establishes the Clearinghouse reporting schedule based on CGCC’s quarter system, including term start, midterm, and end dates. The schedule is posted in the Clearinghouse system, and Clearinghouse sends email reminders before scheduled reporting dates. The Registrar completes the scheduled reporting process, reviews posting results and error reports when received, and resolves any identified errors promptly to allow the enrollment file to be processed and reported. Going forward, the internal control will be to add secondary review by providing the retained report to the Vice President of Student Services. The report will include the date reviewed/submitted and the Registrar’s initials, and the Vice President will also initial the report as evidence of review. This provides documentation of completion and accountability to help ensure enrollment reporting is completed in a timely fashion. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Catherine Graham. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2027.
Recommendation: We recommend the college review the requirements and implement an internal process and control to specifically monitor the outstanding Title IV funded checks. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to ...
Recommendation: We recommend the college review the requirements and implement an internal process and control to specifically monitor the outstanding Title IV funded checks. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: On a monthly basis, as part of the bank reconciliation process, the Business Office generates a report of outstanding student refund checks and reviews it for uncashed items. Uncashed Title IV checks are recorded on a tracking log noting check number, issue date, and amount. When a check remains uncashed for 120 days, the Business Office contacts the student to confirm receipt or determine whether a reissue is needed, and the outreach is documented on the log. The monthly review and log are signed and dated by the preparer; co-signed by the Vice President of Administrative Services, and documentation is retained including months in which no exceptions are noted. At the conclusion of the monthly review process, an email with subject line: Uncashed Refund Checks is forwarded to the Financial Aid Office which includes a spreadsheet listing the students with uncashed refund checks or a note that there were no records for that particular month. Any Title IV check that remains uncashed is canceled by the Business Office. Within 5 - 7 business days of receiving the notification from the Business Office, the Financial Aid Office will notify the third-party servicer, Global Financial Aid Services (herein after referred to as Global) through their established reporting mechanism (GARP) to ensure the funds are returned to the Department of Education no later than 240 days after the date of issuance, as required by 34 CFR 668.164(h). Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Sam Draper and Denise Reid-Strachan. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2027.
2025-001 Aging Cluster-Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B, Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers- Assistance Listing No. 93.044. Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part C, Nutrition Services- Assistance Listing No. 93.045. Nutrition Services Incentive Program- Assi...
2025-001 Aging Cluster-Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B, Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers- Assistance Listing No. 93.044. Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part C, Nutrition Services- Assistance Listing No. 93.045. Nutrition Services Incentive Program- Assistance Listing No. 93.053 Condition Found Out of forty payroll transactions tested, we noted 14 instances where part-time employees did not have their timecard approved by their supervisor. We consider this condition to be a material weakness relating to the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Corrective Action Plan DuPage Senior Citizens Council will strengthen controls over payroll timecard approval to ensure all part time employee timecards are reviewed and approved by an appropriate supervisor prior to payroll processing. Management will formalize and document supervisory approval requirements within written payroll procedures. Payroll will not be processed unless all required timecards reflect documented supervisory review and approval. Oversight of compliance with these procedures will be supported through periodic review by the Executive Director and the outsourced accounting firm through documented policy and process reviews. Responsible Person for Corrective Action Plan Executive Director, with support from the Payroll Clerk Implementation Date of Corrective Action Plan DSCC began implementing this process in May 2025. The corrective action was effective immediately at that time and is considered fully implemented.
« 1 54 55 57 58 2269 »