Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
48,527
In database
Filtered Results
131
Matching current filters
Showing Page
1 of 6
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: § 200.309
Finding 2025.004 – Period of Performance Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Federal Assisted Listing Number:: 14.267 Recommendation We recommend that management implement additional controls and policies over period of performance. Staff who purchase items with grant funds should have additiona...
Finding 2025.004 – Period of Performance Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Federal Assisted Listing Number:: 14.267 Recommendation We recommend that management implement additional controls and policies over period of performance. Staff who purchase items with grant funds should have additional training on period of performance requirements. Planned Corrective Action: TVCCA is strengthening its period of performance controls through the following actions: 1. Training – All employees with purchasing power will be trained on the deadlines of the grants they are responsible for. This training includes what the definition of obligation truly is, as well as allowable spend down period of their grants. Finance staff will also be trained on the timing and definitions of obligations. 2. Revised internal controls and workflow – Cutoff testing will be performed and added to the month close checklist on a quarterly basis to align with grant closing schedules. 3. Monitoring – Cutoff testing will be monitored on a quarterly basis in association with quarter ending checklist. Name of Contact Person: Max Logan, CFO, 860-425-6506, mlogan@tvcca.org Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2026
Finding 2024-010 – Period of Performance (Material Weakness) Finding: The Organization did not have good controls to ensure the period of performance requirements was met due to staff turnover. Management Response: Management concurs. Corrective action plan: •Implement a grant compliance checklist a...
Finding 2024-010 – Period of Performance (Material Weakness) Finding: The Organization did not have good controls to ensure the period of performance requirements was met due to staff turnover. Management Response: Management concurs. Corrective action plan: •Implement a grant compliance checklist and training for staff by the end of 2025 to ensure expenditures are within the grant period. •Require pre-approval for all expenditures near grant end dates. •Quarterly compliance reviews. Responsible Party: CFO Completion Date/Status: Expected to be Implemented by end of 2025; ongoing review.
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS The PRDE acknowledges and accepts the finding. Management recognizes the importance of ensuring that all obligations and expenditures are properly incurred within the authorized period of performance established for each grant in compliance with federal regulations und...
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS The PRDE acknowledges and accepts the finding. Management recognizes the importance of ensuring that all obligations and expenditures are properly incurred within the authorized period of performance established for each grant in compliance with federal regulations under 2 CFR §200.77 and §200.309. The PRDE has initiated a comprehensive review of the purchase orders (POs) identified in the finding that were obligated after the grant award end date of September 30, 2023. Each program—Adult Education (84.002), Special Education (IDEA, 84.027), and Career and Technical Education (Perkins V, 84.048A)—will evaluate these transactions to determine whether they correspond to allowable and valid obligations incurred during the active grant period. Where applicable and supported by documentation, PRDE will adjust or reclassify the expenses to the appropriate and current grant period. In instances where reassignment to an active grant is not possible, PRDE will identify available state funds to absorb these costs and will process the corresponding reimbursements or journal entries to ensure full compliance with federal requirements. Furthermore, PRDE’s Budget Office, in coordination with the Federal Affairs Office and Finance Office, is in the process of strengthening internal control procedures to prevent the creation of POs after the period of performance. This includes: (i)Automating system controls within the SIFDE accounting system to restrict the creation of POs for grants whose period of performance has expired; (ii)Implement an internal monitoring checklist at the program and budget level to validate the effective date of POs prior to approval; (iii)Establishing a communication between the Budget Office and program offices to ensure that any pending obligations are reviewed and processed before the closeout of the grant period. These corrective actions aim to ensure compliance with federal regulations, strengthen accountability, and enhance the overall effectiveness of the internal control environment related to the management of federal funds. IMPLEMENTATION DATE December 30, 2025 RESPONSIBLE PERSON María de los A. Lizardí Valdés Director Office of Federal Affairs Evelyn Rodríguez Cardé Director of Finance Dr. Jorge L. Acosta Irizarry Auxiliary Secretary of Occupational and Technical Education Dr. Yarilis Santiago Ramos Auxiliary Secretary of Adult Education Enid Díaz Nieves Associate Secretary of Special Education Executive Director
Management disagrees with the following A) Management determined the expenditures charged to the 2021-#3 project MSOC Security Sustainment Costs, for camera, installation and project management were clearly related to the Investment justification which requested sustainment and upgrade to the existi...
Management disagrees with the following A) Management determined the expenditures charged to the 2021-#3 project MSOC Security Sustainment Costs, for camera, installation and project management were clearly related to the Investment justification which requested sustainment and upgrade to the existing MSOC the IJ states : “Investment provides maintenance and upgrades of software/hardware (I.e. servers/workstations), video surveillance management systems, operating systems, cameras systems, access control and communication systems for Plaquemines Port Harbor and Terminal District B) Management determined the questioned cost charged to the 2023-#3 project GIS for the cameras and the conference room were supported with the investment justification however management agrees the invoices for Survey totaling $95,900 should not have been changed to the grant. C) Management determined the expenditures charged to the 2023-#4 project Cybersecurity Network and IT: For Datto Backup, which is the name of the program, and cyber security training are valid expenses and align with the investment justification Management will ensure the following processes are added to the financial management policies and procedures over federal and state funds • The District will establish formal procedures requiring that all PSGP expenditures be cross-checked against the approved Investment Justification (IJ) and verified for compliance with the grant’s period of performance prior to payment. No disbursement of federal funds will occur unless documentation demonstrates that the expenditure directly aligns with the approved grant scope and timing. • This documentation will be required within the system in order to process payments to the vendor. • The District will consult with FEMA to assess the allowability of identified questioned costs. Management will follow FEMA’s guidance to resolve any discrepancies and ensure that all expenditures meet federal standards. • Mandatory training sessions are being scheduled for staff involved in grant administration and financial management. These sessions will cover Uniform Guidance requirements, documentation standards, and procedures for verifying expenditure eligibility under PSGP. These actions reflect the District’s commitment to regulatory compliance, fiscal responsibility, and continuous improvement in federal grant management practices.
View Audit 370980 Questioned Costs: $1
Corrective Action Plan – Federal Funds Review and Processing Audit Finding Reference: Response to Finding 2024-002: Improvement Control Over Period of Performance for Federal Awards Name of Contact Person and Completion Date: Krystal De Gray, COO of Nashua School District 09-22-2025 Planned Correcti...
Corrective Action Plan – Federal Funds Review and Processing Audit Finding Reference: Response to Finding 2024-002: Improvement Control Over Period of Performance for Federal Awards Name of Contact Person and Completion Date: Krystal De Gray, COO of Nashua School District 09-22-2025 Planned Corrective Action: The Nashua School District acknowledges the finding related to the control over the period of performance for federal awards (Finding 2024-002). In response, the district will develop and implement a formal internal procedure to ensure that all purchases funded by federal awards are both placed and received within the established period of performance. This procedure will include appropriate review, documentation, and oversight to maintain compliance with federal grant regulations. To further strengthen internal controls, the Nashua School District will implement a procedure limiting purchases to occur no later than 15 days prior to the grant’s end date. Additionally, all necessary services must be received and completed prior to the expiration of the grant period. Mario Andrade Krystal De Gray Superintendent Chief Operating Officer
View Audit 370436 Questioned Costs: $1
2024-003 The City charged costs that were incurred prior to the beginning of the period of performance of the grant. Helen Tomic, Long Range Planning Manager December 31, 2025 The City will implement control procedure to prevent the charging of costs before the period of performance.
2024-003 The City charged costs that were incurred prior to the beginning of the period of performance of the grant. Helen Tomic, Long Range Planning Manager December 31, 2025 The City will implement control procedure to prevent the charging of costs before the period of performance.
View Audit 370339 Questioned Costs: $1
Audit Finding Reference: 2024-001 Description of Finding: The audit revealed that grant expenditures were incurred outside the authorized performance period, resulting in non-compliance with grant regulations and potential cost disallowance. Planned Corrective Action • Conduct a comprehensive assess...
Audit Finding Reference: 2024-001 Description of Finding: The audit revealed that grant expenditures were incurred outside the authorized performance period, resulting in non-compliance with grant regulations and potential cost disallowance. Planned Corrective Action • Conduct a comprehensive assessment of existing procedures to identify gaps that led to noncompliance with grant regulations. • Ensure timely submission of grant applications. • Implement enhanced oversight and monitoring processes for all grant-related expenditures to ensure alignment with policy 2 CFR 200.1. • Maintain detailed documentation of all award dates and expenditures to provide a clear compliance record. • Ensure all documentation is easily accessible and systematically organized for audit purposes. • Ensure pre-award costs are allowable only to the extent they would have been allowable if incurred after the effective date and only with written approval from the Federal awarding agency (as per 2 CFR 200.458). • Establish a process for obtaining and documenting written approval for pre-award costs. • Provide comprehensive training on compliance with Uniform Grant Guidance to all relevant staff. • Review and update policies and procedures related to grant expenditures regularly to ensure they are current and compliant with federal regulations. • Assign accountability for monitoring and reporting compliance to specific roles within the organization. The Business Manager, Elizabeth Bouchard, will be responsible for implementing this plan beginning with the Fiscal Year 2026 grant cycle. As of September 2025, non-compliance issues have been identified and addressed, documentation has been maintained to track award dates, and training has been provided to designated roles within the District. In addition, procedures to maintain detailed documentation of all award dates and expenditures to ensure a clear compliance record have been shared with all District Administrators utilizing grant funds.
View Audit 370226 Questioned Costs: $1
Federal program title - Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund program (LATCF) CFDA 21.032 Recommendation: We recommend the County refine its understanding and interpretation of the standards and ensure that the County policies and procedures are consistent with that understanding and interpre...
Federal program title - Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund program (LATCF) CFDA 21.032 Recommendation: We recommend the County refine its understanding and interpretation of the standards and ensure that the County policies and procedures are consistent with that understanding and interpretation. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The LATCF funds were reported on the SEFA under CFDA 21.032 by the CAO’s department because the funds were transferred from the CAO’s fund to the DOT fund, with the understanding it would be expended. However, DOT did not spend the funds within the same fiscal year in which they received the transfer due to a misunderstanding that the funds could not be used for prior year expense. As a result, the funds were recorded as unearned revenue in fiscal year 2023/24, and the related expenditures will be reported in the following fiscal year. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Lisa McNeely Department of Transportation Business Manager & Christine Gaffney Auditor-Controller. Planned completion date for correcting action plan: Completed
View Audit 366553 Questioned Costs: $1
USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Oversees – Assistance Listing No. 98.001 Recommendation: Management should review its existing control structure and ensure that there are adequate processes and controls to ensure only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are booked to Federa...
USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Oversees – Assistance Listing No. 98.001 Recommendation: Management should review its existing control structure and ensure that there are adequate processes and controls to ensure only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are booked to Federal programs and that the correct program codes are charged, based on the underlying supporting documentation. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Training on the Federal awards regulations to be provided to the country office. In addition, adjustments will be made to the review structure of expenditure to ensure full compliance. Follow up of the implementation status will be carried out by HQ finance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Florence Ruona Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2025
View Audit 366111 Questioned Costs: $1
County department personnel changes have been implemented, which address this deficiency. Additional training from the Auditor’s Office and state grantors has occurred for newer staff in certain departments with large amounts of federal and state awards.
County department personnel changes have been implemented, which address this deficiency. Additional training from the Auditor’s Office and state grantors has occurred for newer staff in certain departments with large amounts of federal and state awards.
View Audit 365342 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 573665 (2024-002)
Material Weakness 2024
Action taken in response to finding: Trilogy will conduct a thorough review of our current cost allocation procedures to identify gaps related to the timing and eligibility of expenses. Based on this review, we will revise our process to ensure that only allowable costs incurred within the grant’s p...
Action taken in response to finding: Trilogy will conduct a thorough review of our current cost allocation procedures to identify gaps related to the timing and eligibility of expenses. Based on this review, we will revise our process to ensure that only allowable costs incurred within the grant’s period of performance are charged. A multi-tiered review process will be established, to verify expense timing and relevance and to confirm compliance with grant terms. Staff will review descriptions and flag transactions that fall outside the grant’s period of performance. These controls will prevent such costs from being allocated unless properly justified and approved. Staff involved in grant management will receive updated training on federal cost principles, including the importance of period-of-performance compliance. Written guidance will be distributed to reinforce expectations. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Shunita Rhodes & Hagar Buster Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 2025
View Audit 364306 Questioned Costs: $1
Tuerk House, Inc. recognizes the importance of maintaining compliance with federal grant requirements related to allowable costs and documentation standards. The Organization acknowledges the deficiencies identified in the areas of time and effort reporting and supporting documentation for expenditu...
Tuerk House, Inc. recognizes the importance of maintaining compliance with federal grant requirements related to allowable costs and documentation standards. The Organization acknowledges the deficiencies identified in the areas of time and effort reporting and supporting documentation for expenditures charged to grant programs. To address this finding, Tuerk House is taking the following corrective actions: ·Implementing a formal time and effort certification process that requires employees to certify actual time worked on federal grant activities on a regular basis, rather than relying on budgeted allocations. ·Developing a standardized cost allocation methodology that aligns with actual grant activity and is supported by verifiable documentation. ·Requiring that all expenditures charged to federal awards be supported by complete and accurate source documentation, including vendor invoices, timesheets, and approvals. ·Establishing a document retention policy consistent with 2 CFR § 200.334 to ensure all supporting records are retained for the required period and readily accessible for audit or review. Training sessions for program and finance staff will be conducted to ensure consistent understanding and application of these updated policies and procedures. Organization Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action – Joseph Koehler, Director of Finance Anticipated Completion Date – June 30, 2025
View Audit 361681 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: We recommend that only costs incurred during the period of performance be charged to the grant. For payroll in which pay periods extend over multiple budget periods, we recommend prorating the amount charged to the grant by the days worked within the grant period. Explanation of disa...
Recommendation: We recommend that only costs incurred during the period of performance be charged to the grant. For payroll in which pay periods extend over multiple budget periods, we recommend prorating the amount charged to the grant by the days worked within the grant period. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: 1. Create list of grants with pertinent contract terms for monitoring and reference. Highlight grants with term end dates within the fiscal year. 2. Update Grant Tracking workpapers to alert on grant year end and create allocation tab to separate payroll expenses that crossover grant end terms. Review non-payroll expenses to ensure they belong to proper grant term. 3. Monitor progress and review grants at fiscal year end to ensure process was followed. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Keith Flores, CFO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 8/31/2025
View Audit 361495 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding Reference Number: 2024-003 – Period of Performance Federal Program: AL 20.237 High Priority Grant — FMCSA Cluster Name of Contact Person: Tim Adams, CEO Views of Responsible Officials: IRP acknowledges the finding and concurs with the recommendation. Planned Corrective Action: Grant managem...
Finding Reference Number: 2024-003 – Period of Performance Federal Program: AL 20.237 High Priority Grant — FMCSA Cluster Name of Contact Person: Tim Adams, CEO Views of Responsible Officials: IRP acknowledges the finding and concurs with the recommendation. Planned Corrective Action: Grant management procedures have been revised to verify that services are received and costs incurred within the authorized period of performance in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403 before the costs are charged to a federal award. Staff involved in grant management will receive targeted training on 2 CFR requirements related to period-of-performance compliance and allowable cost timing. Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2025
View Audit 361417 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024-001: Inclusion of Out-of-Period Costs in Current Year (Significant Deficiency): During the audit of federal award expenditures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, it was discovered that costs incurred in prior periods were improperly charged to the current year’s federal awards...
Finding 2024-001: Inclusion of Out-of-Period Costs in Current Year (Significant Deficiency): During the audit of federal award expenditures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, it was discovered that costs incurred in prior periods were improperly charged to the current year’s federal awards. Name of Contact Person: Lucy Maddock, Chief Financial Officer email: lrm@ams.org Corrective Action Plan: The AMS processes payroll on a bi-weekly schedule. During the 2024 audit, we discovered that an initial payroll allocation for grant supported labor costs included days from the prior month that did not fall within the approved dates of the grant agreement. To ensure that this does not happen again the following procedures are being put into place effective immediately: 1. The grant accountant will review the payroll register at the beginning of each grant period and determine the actual percentage of payroll to allocate to the grant so that time periods are aligned. This may involve adjusting entries to accrue payroll into correct time periods. This will ensure costs incurred in prior periods are not charged to current year federal awards. 2. Grant payroll entries will be reviewed and approved by the Controller. 3. At the conclusion of the grant, all payroll entries will be reviewed one final time. Should any differences be found between the dates and amounts authorized by grant budget and those recorded in the G/L, correcting entries must be made before the final report is submitted to the cognizant agency. Anticipated Completion Date: These steps are being implemented effective immediately.
Teenage Pregnancy Prevention Program – Assistance Listing No. 93.297 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement stronger internal controls to monitor the period of performance on its federal awards. This includes regular training for staff on compliance requirements and establishing cle...
Teenage Pregnancy Prevention Program – Assistance Listing No. 93.297 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement stronger internal controls to monitor the period of performance on its federal awards. This includes regular training for staff on compliance requirements and establishing clear communication channels between finance and program departments. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: PPNCS has reviewed and updated processes to ensure the expenses for the grant period are for the period in question and not merely reported in the General Ledger during the grant period. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Randy Drager, CFO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: May 1, 2025
View Audit 355925 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: We recommend the Agency more carefully monitor expenditures incurred near grant end dates to ensure compliance with period of performance compliance requirements. Action taken: Management agrees with this finding and will more carefully monitor grant end dates to comply with period...
Recommendation: We recommend the Agency more carefully monitor expenditures incurred near grant end dates to ensure compliance with period of performance compliance requirements. Action taken: Management agrees with this finding and will more carefully monitor grant end dates to comply with period of performance compliance requirements.
1. Implement pre-approval controls; require date validation for all expenses against the award' s period of performance. Program Director or Executive Director or Accounting Director to review and approve. 2. Conduct training; educating staff on 2 CFR requirements and period-of-performance limitatio...
1. Implement pre-approval controls; require date validation for all expenses against the award' s period of performance. Program Director or Executive Director or Accounting Director to review and approve. 2. Conduct training; educating staff on 2 CFR requirements and period-of-performance limitations. 3. Perform periodic reviews; monitor compliance quarterly to detect outliers.
1. Implement pre-submission controls; require Date validation for all expenses against the award's period of performance. Program Director or Executive Director or Accounting Director to review and approve. 2. Conduct training; educating staff on 2 CFR requirements and period-of-performance limitati...
1. Implement pre-submission controls; require Date validation for all expenses against the award's period of performance. Program Director or Executive Director or Accounting Director to review and approve. 2. Conduct training; educating staff on 2 CFR requirements and period-of-performance limitations. 3. Perform periodic reviews; monitor compliance quarterly to detect outliers.
Finding 2024-001 Condition: Costs were recorded for service periods prior to grant approval date. Corrective Action Planned: The district will implement controls to prevent the recording of costs for service periods prior to grant approval date by written guidance to all staff involved in federal ...
Finding 2024-001 Condition: Costs were recorded for service periods prior to grant approval date. Corrective Action Planned: The district will implement controls to prevent the recording of costs for service periods prior to grant approval date by written guidance to all staff involved in federal grant funds. Please note, that the practice at question is not in violation of school committee policy as we have not made any expenditures outside that entity’s approval date. Anticipated Completion Date: By July 1, 2025 Contact: Ross Mulkerin, Director of Finance and Operations
View Audit 352205 Questioned Costs: $1
2024-007 Research and Development Cluster – Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 84.017 and 47.081 – Period of Performance Recommendation: We recommend that the University review and revise their current procedures in place and provide training to employees within the grant and finance functions related ...
2024-007 Research and Development Cluster – Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 84.017 and 47.081 – Period of Performance Recommendation: We recommend that the University review and revise their current procedures in place and provide training to employees within the grant and finance functions related to the grant reconciliation and recording process to ensure expenses are reflected prior to the grant ending and recorded in the correct period on the SEFA. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement to the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Restricted Funds Accounting (RFA) team has restructured with new leadership and added all new staff. RFA will train new staff, develop and update policies and procedures, and automate processes within ERP systems, as appropriate. RFA is creating current and updated SOPS for each task and making sure the current staff is learning processes the correct way; this includes reconciliation and recording in the correct period. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Director of Accounting, Tonya Cardwell. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 2026
Finding 541859 (2024-007)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Dear Mr. Waguespack, Please find below the University's management response to the audit finding titled “Noncompliance with Period of Performance Requirements." Management Response: The University concurs with the audit finding. Expense Posting Delay ($28,833): This salary charge reflects work pe...
Dear Mr. Waguespack, Please find below the University's management response to the audit finding titled “Noncompliance with Period of Performance Requirements." Management Response: The University concurs with the audit finding. Expense Posting Delay ($28,833): This salary charge reflects work performed within the approved award period. The delay occurred because the Personnel Action Form was received after the June payroll run, resulting in disbursements in July and August. Although the work was completed on time, the payroll posting did not align with the period of performance requirements. We are reviewing our processes to ensure all required documentation is received and processed promptly. Liquidation of Obligations ($34,957): The University failed to liquidate obligations totaling $34,957 within 120 days following the period of performance. This shortfall is due to staffing challenges in the Sponsored Programs Finance Administration and Compliance (SPFAC) Department. The University is actively exploring strategies to attract and retain qualified grant accountants to improve timely fund closeouts. Additional Mitigation Measures 1. Engaging External Consultants: o The University will engage an outside consultant to assess the university's research and administration structure, identifying opportunities to enhance processes and ensure compliance. o The University is retaining interim professional staffing to assist with invoicing and pre-audit review and to provide functional and technical expertise. 2. Deployment of an Electronic Research Administration System (eRA) o The University has begun identifying and implementing an electronic research administration system to transform grant management by offering a centralized platform that automates the entire lifecycle from proposal to closeout, minimizing manual errors while ensuring policy compliance and providing clear portfolio visibility through comprehensive reporting capabilities. The SPFAC Director will oversee the implementation of these corrective actions.
View Audit 350759 Questioned Costs: $1
Boston Public Schools will take a multi-step approach to ensure accuracy of spending to the grant award period. Anticipated Completion Date: January 31, 2025 Responsible Contact Person: Colin Musto, Assistant City Auditor, Grants Monitoring Unit colin.musto@boston.gov
Boston Public Schools will take a multi-step approach to ensure accuracy of spending to the grant award period. Anticipated Completion Date: January 31, 2025 Responsible Contact Person: Colin Musto, Assistant City Auditor, Grants Monitoring Unit colin.musto@boston.gov
View Audit 349776 Questioned Costs: $1
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects - Assistance Listing No. 93.243 Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with ...
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects - Assistance Listing No. 93.243 Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: MURC will perform a review of policies and procedures to ensure recorded transactions are within the proper period of performance related to grant end dates. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jennifer Wood Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025
Research and Development Cluster- Assistance Listing Nos. 93.323, 93.847 Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit f...
Research and Development Cluster- Assistance Listing Nos. 93.323, 93.847 Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: MURC will perform a review of policies and procedures to ensure recorded transactions are within the proper period of performance related to grant end dates. Name{s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jennifer Wood Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025
View Audit 349740 Questioned Costs: $1
2 3 6 »