Audit 382425

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$19.61M
Findings
5
Programs
10
Organization: Bishop State Community College (AL)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-01-16

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1169501 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes N
1169502 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes N
1169503 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes N
1169504 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes B
1169505 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.063 FEDERAL PELL GRANT PROGRAM $12.66M Yes 1
84.031 HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL AID $4.76M Yes 2
84.425 EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND $602,297 Yes 0
84.002 ADULT EDUCATION - BASIC GRANTS TO STATES $508,809 Yes 0
84.048 CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION -- BASIC GRANTS TO STATES $459,612 Yes 0
84.042 TRIO STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES $273,385 Yes 0
84.007 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANTS $206,426 Yes 1
84.033 FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM $97,605 Yes 1
20.205 HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION $37,700 Yes 0
64.028 POST-9/11 VETERANS EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE $931 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
WTDAUMTURGC5 Kelly Little Auditee
2514057059 Jeri S Groce Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Bishop State Community College (the College under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance).

Finding Details

Finding 2025-004 – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance)- ((Repeat finding) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Assistance Cluster Criteria: The NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide provides requirements and guidance for reporting enrollment details under the Pell grant and other programs. Institutions must update the Enrollment Reporting Roster for changes in student status, report the date the enrollment status was effective, enter the new anticipated completion date and submit the changes electronically through the batch method or the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) website. Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third-party servicer. These changes include reductions or increases in attendance levels, withdrawals, graduations or approved leaves-of-absence.Condition: We tested a sample of 25 withdrawn students. In one instance, the change in status was not reported within the required 60-day time frame. Cause: When the College uploads data to the Clearinghouse, international students are omitted. These students are identified by a specific attribute automatically added to their record when they apply to the College. This student initially submitted an international student application, however, the student is not an international student and the status was updated, but the international student attribute was not removed. As a result, the student was excluded from the Clearinghouse upload for the Fall 2024 term. Effect: The College did not report the student enrollment status change in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures related to enrollment reporting requirements to comply with the regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
Finding 2025-002 – Allowable Costs and Period of Performance (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance)- (Partial repeat finding) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education, Higher Education – Institutional Aid (Title III), Assistance Listing No. 84.031 Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E establishes cost principles to apply in determining costs under federal awards. Non-federal entities are also required to establish controls over the disbursement process to ensure compliance with allowable cost requirements. In addition, a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and non-federal entities are also required to establish controls over the disbursement process to ensure compliance with period of performance requirements. [2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)]. Condition: We selected a sample of 25 non-payroll disbursements and 25 payroll disbursements charged to the grant. There were 44 pay checks tested in the sample of 25; of those 44, nine exceptions were noted. In four instances, there was no documented approved pay rate and in five instances, there was no approval for salary to be charged to the grant number and documentation showed unrestricted, a different account or offer letter had no Title III documentation. Cause: The College did not obtain proper approval by the Director of the program, expenses did not fit into the grant budget line items, approved pay rates were not properly documented as approved Title III expenses for the proper grant period. Effect: The College’s grant disbursements were not properly approved. Questioned Costs: $14,731 Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures surrounding payroll and non-payroll grant disbursements to ensure controls are functioning and compliant withfederal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
Finding 2025-003 – Reporting (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance)- (Repeat finding) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education, Higher Education – Institutional Aid, Assistance Listing No. 84.031 Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.328 and 329 establish reporting requirements for non-federal entities that include timely and accurate reporting. Non-federal entities are also required to establish controls over the reporting process to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Condition: We selected two annual reports submitted during the year to test for controls and compliance. No documentation of review or approval of the reports was available. In addition, amounts reported on one report did not tie to underlying financial support. Cause: The College did not retain documentation of a review and approval of the reports submitted. The College did not submit an accurate report. Effect: The College did not have appropriate review and approval processes in place or documentation. Questioned Costs: None reported Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures over the grant reporting process to ensure controls are properly implemented and working effectively. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.