Compliance Requirement Allowable Costs and Allowable Activities Type of Finding Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Program Port Security Grant Program ALN # 97.056 Federal Agency Department of Homeland Security – Direct Award Federal Award Year 2021 and 2023 Grant Numbers EMW-2021-PU-00030- IJ#3 EMW-2023-PU-00164- IJ#4 Questioned Costs $209,855 Criteria - Federal rules require that grant funds be spent only on allowable and necessary costs that are directly related to the purpose of the award. For the Port Security Grant Program (PSGP), this means expenditures must match the projects described in the approved Investment Justification (IJ). In addition, all costs must be incurred within the official grant period; expenses made before or after the authorized performance dates are not permitted. Uniform Guidance establishes clear requirements for allowability of costs under federal awards: • 2 CFR 200.403 – Costs must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and consistently treated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. • 2 CFR 200.405 – Costs must be directly allocable to the federal award in proportion to the benefits received. • 2 CFR 200.403(c) and 200.404 – Costs must conform to limitations or exclusions set forth in the award documents and applicable federal regulations. • 2 CFR 200.309 – A non-federal entity may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance, unless specifically authorized otherwise.Condition - Testing of 50 invoices identified significant noncompliance. Fourteen (14) invoices represented expenditures that were not aligned with the approved Investment Justification (IJ), indicating that funds were used for purposes outside the scope of the grant award. In addition, one (1) invoice reflected costs incurred prior to the authorized period of performance, in direct violation of federal grant requirements. a) Expenditures were charged to the 2021 PSGP for the purchase of camera equipment, installation, and project management activities that lacked support within the approved Investment Justification No. 3 MSOC Security Sustainment Costs, resulting in questioned costs of $78,910. b) Expenditures were charged to the 2023 PSGP for the purchase of computer equipment, conference room enhancements, and biological and cultural survey that lacked support within the approved Investment Justification No. 3 GIS Acquisition and Implementation, resulting in questioned costs of $115,044 c) Expenditures were charged to the 2023 PSGP for the purchase of executive leadership training and datto backups that lacked support within the approved Investment Justification No. 4 Sustainment for Cybersecurity Network and IT Systems, resulting in questioned costs of $15,901Cause - The District failed to implement and enforce adequate internal controls to ensure that expenditures were reviewed and validated against both the approved Investment Justification and the grant’s period of performance prior to authorization. This lack of oversight reflects a breakdown in management’s responsibility for compliance with federal grant requirements. Effect - Because the District did not ensure expenditures were properly reviewed against the approved Investment Justifications and the authorized period of performance, a total of $209,855 in questioned costs was identified. These unallowable expenditures increase the risk that federal grantor agencies may require repayment or disallowance of costs, and indicate material noncompliance with federal grant requirements. The lack of adequate review and oversight also undermines accountability for federal funds, creating heightened risk of waste, abuse, and additional future noncompliance. Recommendation - The District must implement and enforce formal review procedures requiring all PSGP expenditures to be cross-checked against the approved Investment Justification (IJ) and verified for compliance with the grant’s period of performance prior to payment. No disbursement of federal funds should occur until documentation demonstrates that the expenditure directly aligns with the approved grant scope and timing. The District must consult with FEMA regarding the allowability of identified questioned costs.
Compliance Requirement Procurement Type of Finding Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Program Port Security Grant Program ALN# 97.056 Federal Agency Department of Homeland Security – Direct Award Federal Award Year 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 Grant Number EMW-2020-PU-00079 – IJ#1, IJ#3, IJ #4 EMW-2021-PU-00030 – IJ#1, IJ#3 EMW-2022-PU-00022 – IJ#1, IJ#2, EMW-2023-PU-00164 – IJ#1, IJ#2, IJ#3, IJ#4 EMW-2024-PU-05541 – IJ#4 Questioned Costs $463,460 Criteria - Federal rules require grant recipients to follow strict purchasing standards. This includes seeking fair and open competition when buying goods or services, obtaining bids or quotes once purchases reach certain dollar thresholds, and verifying that vendors are not suspended or barred from receiving federal funds through the SAM.gov system. Federal rules set strict procurement standards that the District must follow: • 2 CFR 200.318 – Requires non-federal entities to maintain oversight to ensure contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts. • 2 CFR 200.319 – Requires full and open competition in all procurement transactions. • 2 CFR 200.320 – Establishes methods of procurement, including micro-purchases, small purchases, sealed bids, competitive proposals, and noncompetitive proposals. • 2 CFR 200.323 – Requires cost or price analysis for procurements above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. • 2 CFR 200.213 – Requires checks for suspension and debarment (SAM.gov).Under Louisiana law, political subdivisions such as ports are also subject to state purchasing thresholds: (a) $0 – $9,999: Purchases may be made directly but must be reasonable and properly documented. (b) $10,000 – $60,000: At least three (3) telephone or written quotations are required, with documentation kept on file. (c) Over $60,000: A formal advertised public bid process is required in compliance with Louisiana Public Bid Law. For professional services, the District is required to follow competitive selection processes consistent with their policies, Louisiana state law and federal guidance, ensuring fair opportunity, transparency, and reasonable pricing. Condition - The District failed to comply with federal procurement standards in multiple areas, indicating a pervasive breakdown in procurement controls and noncompliance with 2 CFR 200.318–.327. a) The District did not obtain competitive bids for the camera purchases and installation, resulting in questioned costs of $234,217 b) For professional services contracts funded by the PSGP, relating the IT services, engineering and consulting services, and GIS implantation services, the District did not maintain records documenting requests for price quotes or maintain records demonstrating the reasonableness of costs. Resulting in questioned costs of $305,657. c) For all ten (10) vendors tested under the Port Security Grant Program, the District did not retain documentation demonstrating that SAM.gov suspension and debarment verifications were performed prior to award or payment. Cause - The District failed to enforce federally required procurement standards and did not maintain sufficient documentation to demonstrate compliance. This deficiency reflects a significant weakness in procurement oversight and a lack of management attention to ensuring adherence with federal regulations governing competition, cost reasonableness, and vendor selection. Effect - Because the District did not obtain the required bids, quotes, or suspension and debarment checks, it cannot demonstrate compliance with federal procurement standards. This failure increases the risk of waste, favoritism, or contracting with ineligible vendors, and resulted in questioned costs as calculated by the auditor.Recommendation - The District must consistently apply written procurement policies that require competitive bids or price quotes for all purchases and professional services. Documentation of price reasonableness must be retained for every procurement action to ensure compliance with 2 CFR 200.318–.327 The District must document SAM.gov suspension and debarment verification for all vendors and contractors prior to contract execution or payment. This documentation must be maintained in the procurement file. The District must consult with FEMA regarding the allowability of identified questioned costs.
Compliance Requirement Cash Management and Reporting Type of Finding Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Material Noncompliance Program Port Security Grant Program ALN# 97.056 Federal Agency Department of Homeland Security – Direct Award Federal Award Year 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 Grant Number EMW-2022-PU-00022 – IJ#1, IJ#2, EMW-2023-PU-00164 – IJ#1, IJ#2, IJ#3, IJ#4 EMW-2024-PU-05541 – IJ#4 Questioned Costs None Criteria - Federal rules require grant recipients to request reimbursement from the federal government soon after paying expenses, rather than holding costs for long periods. They also require financial reports to be accurate, up to date, and complete. To meet these standards, timely reporting must be supported by timely reimbursement requests so that the reports truly reflect the District’s financial activity. Condition - Although the District submitted the required SF-425 Federal Financial Reports on a timely basis, it did not submit requests for reimbursement timely. Repeatedly, reimbursements were requested nine to twelve months after expenditures were incurred, creating cash flow inefficiencies and increasing risk of misreporting. The total value of these requests were $661,577 Cause - The District failed to establish and implement adequate procedures to ensure reimbursement requests were submitted in coordination with actual cash outflows. This control weakness reflects insufficient oversight of cash management practices and resulted in noncompliance with federal requirements for timely reimbursement.Effect - Delayed reimbursement requests reduce cash management efficiency and create potential inconsistencies between reporting and drawdown activity. Recommendation - The District must establish and enforce policies mandating that reimbursement requests be submitted promptly after vendor payments are made. The District must reconcile reimbursement activity with SF-425 reporting to ensure that expenditures are accurately, timely, and consistently reflected in financial reports submitted to FEMA, in compliance with 2 CFR 200.305 and 2 CFR 200.328