Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
59,856
In database
Filtered Results
184
Matching current filters
Showing Page
1 of 8
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: § 200.405
· Review current cost allocation plan and policy to determine if all information presented and needed is included in the policy document · Work with outside agency to review top down approach to cost allocation philosophy and determine if revisions are warranted · Work to payroll vendor to review th...
· Review current cost allocation plan and policy to determine if all information presented and needed is included in the policy document · Work with outside agency to review top down approach to cost allocation philosophy and determine if revisions are warranted · Work to payroll vendor to review the process to re-establish time-and-effort reporting through the timesheet entry process and the consolidation of time-and-effort information into reporting that can be easily summated by department/project and uploaded to MIP · Determine the allocation and cost distribution methods needed and the resulting detail reporting needed to substantiate the allocation methods used for propriety · Reinstitute the timesheet entry process by project/cost code and train staffing at an upcoming All Staff meeting to reset the view of timesheets and their importance of timesheet tracking to minimize errors for cost allocation purposes · Have staff begin using timesheets in Paylocity (by December 1st) · Complete update of Fiscal Policies Manual (inclusive of Cost Allocation methodology and philosophy) and timely reviews (i.e. at a minimum semiannually or with major program changes/contracts) to ensure no substantive changes needed to policy or actions needed to ensure appropriate accounting updates
The Society of American Foresters has enhanced their exis􀆟ng expense recogni􀆟on controls for event-related invoices by reques􀆟ng more detailed vendor invoices that clearly iden􀆟fy the event and applicable service period, implemen􀆟ng addi􀆟onal review for vendors with recurring or overlapping billing ...
The Society of American Foresters has enhanced their exis􀆟ng expense recogni􀆟on controls for event-related invoices by reques􀆟ng more detailed vendor invoices that clearly iden􀆟fy the event and applicable service period, implemen􀆟ng addi􀆟onal review for vendors with recurring or overlapping billing arrangements, and reinforcing current invoice review procedures to ensure that the period of benefit is adequately documented, par􀆟cularly for transac􀆟ons occurring near year-end. These enhancements are intended to further strengthen the Society’s already effec􀆟ve control environment and support consistent and accurate recogni􀆟on of event expenses in accordance with federal requirements and GAAP.
View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan WESST acknowledges this finding, remains committed to continuous improvement, and has already taken proactive, substantive corrective action. During the fiscal year under review, the organization experienced a leadership transition when a new ...
View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan WESST acknowledges this finding, remains committed to continuous improvement, and has already taken proactive, substantive corrective action. During the fiscal year under review, the organization experienced a leadership transition when a new Chief Executive Officer assumed responsibility following the departure of a CEO who had served for 33 years. At the same time, WESST faced significant and sudden changes in long-term funding sources, requiring prompt financial and operational adjustments. A significant finance department change occurred in October 2025. As noted in the Statement of Condition above, no exceptions were identified after that point. In connection with this change, WESST implemented key control processes, including: o All expenses will be reviewed for allowability, allocability, and reasonableness before being charged to the grant. o Payroll charges recorded in the general ledger will be reconciled to employee time records or approved allocation schedules each month. Variances will be investigated and corrected in a timely manner. o All changes to payroll allocations require documented justification and formal review and approval. o Monthly expense reviews will be performed by the: • Staff Accountant • Program Director • Accounting Controller o These reviews will support proper classification of direct and indirect costs and help prevent inconsistent treatment Corrective Action Plan Timeline Completed implementation in March of 2026. Designation of Employee Position Responsible for Meeting Deadline Chief Executive Officer
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS As a result of a Specific Conditions letter issued by the United States Department of Education (USDE), in March 2021 the Puerto Rico Department of Education (PRDE) signed a contract with a Third-Party Fiduciary Agent (“TPFA”) to oversee the administration of federal f...
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS As a result of a Specific Conditions letter issued by the United States Department of Education (USDE), in March 2021 the Puerto Rico Department of Education (PRDE) signed a contract with a Third-Party Fiduciary Agent (“TPFA”) to oversee the administration of federal funds. As this was the first time the PRDE was required by the USDE to contract a TPFA, the PRDE received support and guidance from the USDE. The USDE reviewed and approved the key procurement terms of the RFP, including the stipulated fixed fee provision for payment of TPFA services and expenses. The following is the PRDE's response to Finding Reference Number 2025-003. Statement of Condition 1 — Reasonableness of the Average Hourly Rate The PRDE does not agree with the implication, in Statement of Condition 1, that the average hourly rate is unreasonable. As the contract stipulates a fixed monthly fee, the reasonableness of the hourly rate should be calculated over an extended performance period, as the hours worked during a particular month fluctuate depending upon the level of work required to be performed. In the sample of invoices examined for the twelve-month period beginning June 2024 and ending May 2025, the total invoice amounts over the twelve-month period, less related expenses and the 1.5% contribution fee to the Government of Puerto Rico, divided by the total hours worked, results in an average hourly rate of $407.83, which is slightly above the noted “reasonable” rate which was addressed over 5 years ago in the RFP. Adjusting for a cumulative inflation rate of 24.48% since 2020, the RFP range of rates would have been between $81 and $438, so the average hourly rate of $407.83 is within that range. However, it should be noted that the rates in the RFP were expected to be local billing rates and not rates of a global consulting firm providing TPFA services from a team of experienced international senior professionals. The range of rates noted in the invoice template, i.e., $195–$695, and highlighted in each TPFA monthly invoice, approximates rates of the US General Services Administration (GSA). The PRDE does not agree with the recommendation that contract terms with the vendor should be revised before the contract expires. As this was the first time the PRDE was required to contract the services of a TPFA, the PRDE received guidance from the USDE, which reviewed and approved the key procurement terms of the RFP, including the stipulated fixed fee provision for the payment of TPFA services and expenses. The fixed fees were a result of extensive negotiations between the PRDE and the selected vendor and, although the hours and expenses are disclosed in each monthly invoice, this is provided for informational purposes only and, as stated in each invoice, “is not to be used to calculate the Total Amount Due,” which in each month is the applicable fixed fee. In addition, the PRDE does not agree with the recommendation that the TPFA submit supporting evidence for the reimbursement of expenses because (i) the TPFA contract is a fixed fee that is inclusive of all professional service fees and expenses, (ii) the TPFA provides an explanation of major expenses incurred within each monthly invoice, and (iii) the monthly fixed fee invoice is not requesting any specific reimbursement for expenses incurred. Statement of Condition 2 — Allocability Between Federal and Non-Federal Funds The PRDE does not agree with the finding that there is no basis for the allocation of costs between Federal and non-Federal funds. The funding of TPFA invoices from various federal funds was a result of (i) reasonable discussions between the PRDE and the USDE, (ii) the USDE's authorization for the availability of federal funds to pay TPFA invoices, and (iii) the actual availability of both federal and state funds at the PRDE from which to pay TPFA invoices. Furthermore, the TPFA services are applicable to all federal funds under the TPFA's administration, and its work is not directly tied to any specific grant. The funding for TPFA services is divided between federal and state funds as agreed to between the PRDE and the USDE, and payment for those services is determined based upon the availability of both federal and state funds. TPFA services are conducted for the benefit of the entire PRDE organization and, as such, are overhead costs not directly tied to any specific program or purpose. In addition, funds used to pay TPFA invoices are sourced from grant administration accounts that are specifically designated for the payment of overhead costs. Auditor Comment on Management Response for Finding No. 2025-003 The 2 CFR 200.1 establishes that: “Indirect [facilities & administrative (F&A)] costs mean those costs incurred for a common or joint purpose benefitting more than one cost objective, and not readily assignable to the cost objectives specifically benefitted, without effort disproportionate to the results achieved. To facilitate equitable distribution of indirect expenses to the cost objectives served, it may be necessary to establish a number of pools of indirect (F&A) costs. Indirect (F&A) cost pools must be distributed to benefitted cost objectives on bases that will produce an equitable result in consideration of relative benefits derived.” This information was not provided for our evaluation. Also, we made reference to the Program Determination Email for ALNs. 84.938 and 84.425 dated September 18, 2024 (Audit Control Number 02-21-39634), received from Ms. Catherine Miers of the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education of the US Department of Education (USDE), in which they required that the PRDE provide documentation for the following corrective actions: “revised the contract terms to include a reconciliation of total hours and rates to adjust the payments made to the vendor before the contract expiration; requested that adequate supporting evidence from the vendors be presented for any expenses to be reimbursed by the PRDE; and develop an adequate review of the vendors invoice to properly identify the actual hours of services that benefited the Federal programs so a correct allocation of the costs incurred can be made within Federal programs and state funds”. IMPLEMENTATION DATE None RESPONSIBLE PERSON Jullymar Octtaviani Vega Sub-Secretary of Administration Edgar Delgado Serrano Interim Director of Federal Affairs Office
Provide funder-led training sessions for management and staff, maintain current budget tracking incorporated federal program compliance into relevant staff performance evaluations, implement a dual-storage documentation methodology combining a shared drive and a document management system (DMS) and ...
Provide funder-led training sessions for management and staff, maintain current budget tracking incorporated federal program compliance into relevant staff performance evaluations, implement a dual-storage documentation methodology combining a shared drive and a document management system (DMS) and update the Finance Manual.
Provide all management staff with annual training on federal grant requirements, perform periodic internal reviews and a final year-end reconciliation, maintainall grant-related records on a shared organizational drive accessible to all responsible staff, provide formal onboarding and off boarding p...
Provide all management staff with annual training on federal grant requirements, perform periodic internal reviews and a final year-end reconciliation, maintainall grant-related records on a shared organizational drive accessible to all responsible staff, provide formal onboarding and off boarding procedures for federal grant management, and update the Finance Manual .
Corrective Action Plan Finding 2025-001 – Allowable Costs Requirement – Time and Effort Reporting for Salaries Corrective Action: Management concurs with the findings. Day One will formalize and implement written procedures governing the documentation, review, and reconciliation of personnel costs c...
Corrective Action Plan Finding 2025-001 – Allowable Costs Requirement – Time and Effort Reporting for Salaries Corrective Action: Management concurs with the findings. Day One will formalize and implement written procedures governing the documentation, review, and reconciliation of personnel costs charged to federal awards. Employees whose compensation is charged, in whole or in part, to federal awards, will be required to complete after-the-fact timesheets that accurately reflect the work performed and the total activity for which they are compensated. The documentation will be reviewed and approved by the employee's supervisor. The Finance Director is responsible for reconciling payroll allocations charged to federal awards to the certified time and effort documentation on a regular basis and ensuring that any differences identified are reviewed and corrected in a timely manner. The Finance Director is responsible for supporting documentation for payroll allocations and reconciliations is maintained in accordance with Day One's record retention policies. Day One will update its written policies and procedures to reflect these requirements and has provided training to employees and supervisors responsible for completing, reviewing, and approving time and effort documentation. The Executive Director will periodically review compliance with these procedures as part of Day One’s internal control monitoring process. We will also do a final year-end review of time and effort allocations and certification. These corrective actions are intended to strengthen internal controls over payroll allocations and ensure that personnel costs charged to federal awards are adequately documented, properly allocated, and supported in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200. Responsible Official: • Anne Patterson, Executive Director – Oversight of implementation and ongoing compliance. Anticipated Completion Date: The corrective actions will be implemented and effective as of September 1, 2026. We have already implemented this process for FY2025. Once the process is complete, Day One will update, after-the-fact documentation and approval to date and will continue the process thereafter.
The Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) concurs with the findings as stated. CFSA will review the intradistrict mandate with the Office of the Chief Technology Officer to gain greater clarity into their budgetary allocation of expenditure methodologies to subsidiary agencies, including CFSA, wit...
The Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) concurs with the findings as stated. CFSA will review the intradistrict mandate with the Office of the Chief Technology Officer to gain greater clarity into their budgetary allocation of expenditure methodologies to subsidiary agencies, including CFSA, with a goal of providing the requested information to auditors during future audits. CFSA will initiate training for management staff to address appropriate practice for time keeping and approvals by September 30, 2026.
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-003 and agrees that the control deficiency related to allocation of expenses within the WIOA Cluster constitutes a material weakness in internal control over compliance. This finding is distinct from Finding 2025-002 because it concerns the m...
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-003 and agrees that the control deficiency related to allocation of expenses within the WIOA Cluster constitutes a material weakness in internal control over compliance. This finding is distinct from Finding 2025-002 because it concerns the methodology, approval, and monitoring of cost allocations affecting WIOA programs, including restrictions applicable to the Youth program, rather than the allowability of costs based on timing or period of performance. Although the identified costs were corrected, the deficiency increased the risk that shared or allocable costs could be assigned to restricted programs in a manner inconsistent with federal requirements if not detected and prevented in a timely manner. Management determined that the root causes were insufficiently detailed written procedures for allocating shared costs within the WIOA Cluster, lack of explicit documentation addressing the prohibition on transfers to or from the Youth program under 20 CFR 683.130, and inconsistent supervisory review of allocation entries before posting. Existing practices addressed cost charging generally, but they did not provide enough direction on how shared expenditures benefiting multiple WIOA funding streams should be allocated, documented, reviewed, and restricted when Youth funds were involved. To address this material weakness, management is implementing four control improvements. First, it will formalize written cost allocation policies and procedures for the WIOA Cluster that define approved methodologies, documentation standards, proportional benefit requirements, and restrictions applicable to the Youth program. Second, it will require documented supervisory review and approval of all allocation entries affecting WIOA programs before posting to the general ledger. Third, it will provide targeted training to finance, grants, and program management personnel on WIOA-specific allocation requirements, with particular emphasis on Youth program restrictions. Fourth, it will implement periodic monitoring to verify that allocations follow the approved methodology and remain consistent with federal requirements. Under the revised process, each allocation affecting WIOA programs will be supported by contemporaneous documentation identifying the nature of the cost, the programs benefiting from the expenditure, the basis used to distribute the cost, and the calculation of the amounts charged to each program. When a cost benefits multiple programs and proportional benefit can be reasonably determined, the allocation will be based on that proportional benefit. When proportional benefit cannot be determined precisely, the allocation will be supported by a reasonable documented method that is applied consistently. Allocation support must also include a compliance checkpoint confirming that no allocation results in an impermissible transfer to or from the Youth program. No allocation entry affecting WIOA programs will be recorded without documented preparer support and written supervisory review evidencing compliance with internal policy and applicable regulations. Management will also establish recurring monitoring controls to test allocations recorded during the year. On at least a quarterly basis, the Finance Director or designee will review a sample of WIOA allocation entries to confirm that the approved methodology was followed, supporting documentation was retained, supervisory approval was completed, and Youth program restrictions were observed. Exceptions identified through this monitoring process will be documented, investigated, and corrected promptly, with any necessary retraining or policy revisions implemented to prevent recurrence. Results of the monitoring process will be communicated to senior management as part of ongoing oversight of federal awards compliance. Management believes these corrective actions directly address the auditors’ recommendations and strengthen controls over allocation of expenses within the WIOA Cluster without duplicating the corrective actions described in Finding 2025-002. Responsibility for implementation will rest primarily with the Finance Director, in coordination with grants and program leadership. Management expects the enhanced policy framework, approval requirements, training, and monitoring activities to reduce the risk of noncompliant allocations, improve documentation of shared cost methodologies, and support sustained compliance with 2 CFR 200.405 and 20 CFR 683.130. Corrective Action Plan Summary Corrective Action Responsible Staff/Role Target Completion Date Evidence of Completion Revise and adopt written WIOA cost allocation policies and procedures that define approved allocation methodologies, documentation requirements, proportional benefit standards, and explicit restrictions applicable to the Youth program. Finance Director; Grants Manager June 30, 2026 Approved policy and procedure document; distribution to applicable staff; retained version history. Implement a standardized allocation worksheet and review checklist for all shared costs charged to WIOA programs, including a compliance checkpoint for Youth program restrictions. Accounting Manager; Finance Director July 15, 2026 Standard allocation template; completed review checklist; sample completed allocation packages. Require documented supervisory review and approval of all allocation entries affecting WIOA programs before posting to the general ledger. Finance Director Effective immediately Signed allocation entries; reviewer signoff; journal entry support retained with monthly close documentation. Provide targeted training to finance, grants, and program personnel on 2 CFR 200.405, WIOA allocation principles, and the prohibition on transfers to or Finance Director; Compliance Officer August 31, 2026 Training materials; attendance logs; completed acknowledgements or assessments. from the Youth program under 20 CFR 683.130. Perform quarterly monitoring of a sample of WIOA allocation entries to verify adherence to the approved methodology, adequacy of support, supervisory approval, and compliance with Youth program restrictions. Finance Director; Compliance Officer Quarterly, beginning September 30, 2026 Quarterly monitoring reports; exception logs; documented corrective follow-up. Evaluate the effectiveness of the revised allocation controls and update policies, training, or monitoring procedures if deficiencies or exceptions are identified. Finance Director; Executive Leadership Semi-annually during fiscal year 2027 Management review memoranda; updated procedures; remediation tracking documentation.
The City has taken steps to strengthen internal controls over the CDBG program. The City will additionally implement formalized procedures requiring, centralized project files containing procurement documentation, cost support, and project eligibility records, document procurement procedures consist...
The City has taken steps to strengthen internal controls over the CDBG program. The City will additionally implement formalized procedures requiring, centralized project files containing procurement documentation, cost support, and project eligibility records, document procurement procedures consistent with Uniform Guidance requirements, including cost/price analysis and justification for contractor selection, collection and review of Davis-Bacon documentation, including wage determinations and certified payrolls, when applicable, verification that required permits are obtained prior to construction and retention of inspection and completion documentation, and secondary review by City staff to ensure all required documentation is complete prior to project closeout. Additionally, the City will provide training to staff involved in CDBG program administration. Responsible Persons: Community Development Director Date of Implementation: Initiate FY 2025-26 with ongoing monitoring into FY 2026-27
April 30, 2026 Finding Number: 2025-001: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs Finding Condition: Allowable costs charged to the grant were coded to an incorrect functional expense within the grant. Planned Corrective Action: Altho...
April 30, 2026 Finding Number: 2025-001: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs Finding Condition: Allowable costs charged to the grant were coded to an incorrect functional expense within the grant. Planned Corrective Action: Although the allowable cost sampled was charged to the correct federal cost category, it was inadvertently charged to the incorrect internal functional account code. We have instituted more rigorous reviews of all elements of account coding during the invoice review process prior to posting invoices to the Accounts Payable ledger. We also note that the cost was reported to the correct cost category on quarterly reports. Responsible Contact Person: Shamar Herron (Executive Director) Sherron@mwse.org Anticipated Completion Date: Effective Immediately Respectfully, Shamar Herron
Recommendation: The Department of Social Services should strengthen internal controls to ensure that it allocates costs to the appropriate federal award in accordance with federal regulations. The Department of Social Services should return federal reimbursements for unallowable costs that it claime...
Recommendation: The Department of Social Services should strengthen internal controls to ensure that it allocates costs to the appropriate federal award in accordance with federal regulations. The Department of Social Services should return federal reimbursements for unallowable costs that it claimed to Children’s Health Insurance Program federal awards. Corrective Action Plan as Reported by the Department of Social Services: The Department agrees with this finding. The Department will review internal controls to identify possible corrective actions. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2026 Department of Social Services Contact Person: Nelida Maldonado, Fiscal Administrative Manager 2 (860) 424-5461
Finding 1211188 (2025-002)
Material Weakness 2025
Syntiro
ME
We agree with the finding and we will be reviewing and implementing the recommendations accordingly. We are committed to ensuring no duplication of costs across reporting periods and compliance with allocability requirements under Uniform Guidance on a prospective basis. This corrective action plan ...
We agree with the finding and we will be reviewing and implementing the recommendations accordingly. We are committed to ensuring no duplication of costs across reporting periods and compliance with allocability requirements under Uniform Guidance on a prospective basis. This corrective action plan will be implemented by June 30, 2026.
Percentages used for allocations will be reviewed annually across all grants/programs and updated during the budget process. These allocations will be reviewed by the CFO. Implemented for the most part in FY2025 but discovered that we had not made corrections to the entire process of allocations, ha...
Percentages used for allocations will be reviewed annually across all grants/programs and updated during the budget process. These allocations will be reviewed by the CFO. Implemented for the most part in FY2025 but discovered that we had not made corrections to the entire process of allocations, have tightened this up in FY2026.
Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management acknowledges the finding and agrees with the recommendation. Once notified of the stipend rate issue, management immediately corrected the allocation and ensured the unallowable portion was funded with non-Federal resources. To prevent fut...
Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management acknowledges the finding and agrees with the recommendation. Once notified of the stipend rate issue, management immediately corrected the allocation and ensured the unallowable portion was funded with non-Federal resources. To prevent future occurrences, SoFIA Management has reinforced controls by (1) requiring a compliance review of stipend rates before charging costs to the AmeriCorps award, (2) updating written procedures to reflect stipend limits, and (3) providing further training to program and finance staff. These measures will ensure that only allowable stipend costs are charged to the Federal program going forward. We are committed to maintaining strong fiscal controls and ensuring full compliance with all federal grant requirements. Contact and Completion Date: Cresha Reid, 954-484-7117, creid@thesofia.org, is the primary contact, and the Chief Executive Officer at the South Florida Institute on Aging. The corrective action will be resolved before the end of the next fiscal year-end of June 30, 2026.
Corrective Action Plan Finding No. 2025-004 Condition – The District submitted an expenditure report for $19,165,569 for the quarter ending March 31, 2025, which included amounts that were properly obligated but not yet expended as of the report date. The District reported $14,638,097 in ESSER funds...
Corrective Action Plan Finding No. 2025-004 Condition – The District submitted an expenditure report for $19,165,569 for the quarter ending March 31, 2025, which included amounts that were properly obligated but not yet expended as of the report date. The District reported $14,638,097 in ESSER funds on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), resulting in an unsupported difference of $4,527,472. Plan – The District will implement additional review processes to ensure material errors are detected and corrected. The District requested all ESSER obligated funds as of March 2025 as directed by the state. Anticipated Date of Completion: 03.06.26 Name of Contact Person: Delfaye Jason, Chief School Business Official
Finding Number: 2025-011 ALN Number(s) and Program Title(s): 21.029 – Coronavirus Capital Project Funds Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Administrative costs charged to CPF were program-related and remained within the statutory administrative cap. ASBO acknowledges, howe...
Finding Number: 2025-011 ALN Number(s) and Program Title(s): 21.029 – Coronavirus Capital Project Funds Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Administrative costs charged to CPF were program-related and remained within the statutory administrative cap. ASBO acknowledges, however, that documentation supporting the internal methodology used to allocate administrative costs across multiple broadband funding streams was not sufficiently formalized during the period reviewed. The identified variance of $22,516 reflects an administrative reconciliation issue rather than an unallowable expenditure, and the variance amount was reduced from a subsequent administrative cost drawdown. Moving forward, the team will more formalize its administrative cost allocation methodology to include a narrative explanation to support allocation percentages, as well as authorizing signatures. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026 Contact Person: Name: Glen Howie Title: State Broadband Director Agency: Arkansas State Broadband Office Address: 1 Commerce Way City, State, Zip: Little Rock, AR 72202 Phone Number: 501-683-6000 Email Address: broadband@arkansas.gov
The District will implement time and effort documentation for employees paid with federal funds. The District has already implemented allocation process on the Child Nutrition invoices in FY26.
The District will implement time and effort documentation for employees paid with federal funds. The District has already implemented allocation process on the Child Nutrition invoices in FY26.
Recommendation: The Department of Social Services should strengthen internal controls to ensure that it allocates costs to the appropriate federal award in accordance with federal regulations. The Department of Social Services should return federal reimbursements for unallowable costs that it claime...
Recommendation: The Department of Social Services should strengthen internal controls to ensure that it allocates costs to the appropriate federal award in accordance with federal regulations. The Department of Social Services should return federal reimbursements for unallowable costs that it claimed to Children’s Health Insurance Program federal awards. Corrective Action Plan as Reported by the Department of Social Services: The Department agrees with this finding. The Department will review internal controls to identify possible corrective actions. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2026 Department of Social Services Contact Person: Nelida Maldonado, Fiscal Administrative Manager 2 (860) 424-5461
Condition: Expenditures for the Child and Adult Care Food Program were incorrectly reported as expenditures to other nutrition programs. Recommendation: The auditors recommend that the School properly identify and report nutrition program expenditures by program. Contact Name: Anastacia Europa Ruiz,...
Condition: Expenditures for the Child and Adult Care Food Program were incorrectly reported as expenditures to other nutrition programs. Recommendation: The auditors recommend that the School properly identify and report nutrition program expenditures by program. Contact Name: Anastacia Europa Ruiz, Chief Operating Officer Corrective Action Planned: The School Management will identify nutrition program expenditures by each separately funded program and report such expenditures by each separately funded program. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026
Condition: For FAL 10.185, all 40 vendor disbursements tested lacked evidence of supervisory approval, as the payment request forms were not signed by the designated approver prior to payment. For FAL 10.558, 27 of thirty-two vendor disbursements tested lacked documented supervisory approval prior t...
Condition: For FAL 10.185, all 40 vendor disbursements tested lacked evidence of supervisory approval, as the payment request forms were not signed by the designated approver prior to payment. For FAL 10.558, 27 of thirty-two vendor disbursements tested lacked documented supervisory approval prior to payment. Finally for FAL 84.010A, two of the ten vendor disbursements tested lacked documented supervisory approval prior to payment. In each noted instance, payments were processed without evidence that the School performed and documented a review in accordance with established internal control procedures. Recommendation: The auditors recommend that the School enforce existing policies requiring documented supervisory approval prior to processing payments and implement monitoring procedures to ensure approval documentation is completed and retained. In addition, the School should strengthen pre-payment review procedures to ensure expenditures are evaluated for allowability, necessity, reasonableness, and proper allocation in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200 and applicable program requirements. Training should be provided to personnel responsible for processing and approving federal program expenditures to reinforce compliance responsibilities. Contact Name: Anastacia Europa Ruiz, Chief Operating Officer Corrective Action Planned: The School Management will require documented supervisory approval, including signature and date, on all payment request forms prior to processing vendor disbursements charged to federal programs. Accounts payable staff will not release payments without evidence of required authorization. Written disbursement procedures will be reviewed and the applicable staff will be retrained within 90 days. The School will perform monthly oversight of disbursement activity and quarterly sample reviews to ensure ongoing compliance. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026
Congressionally Directed Spending – 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the University reviews its procedures around review and approval of expenditures to ensure that only valid expenditures are reported. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit f...
Congressionally Directed Spending – 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the University reviews its procedures around review and approval of expenditures to ensure that only valid expenditures are reported. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The identified expenditures were removed from the award and appropriately reclassified in September 2025. In response to this finding, the University of Maine at Augusta (UMA) has increased the frequency of general ledger review for its federal awards from monthly to twice monthly. This review process includes a direct cross-reference between transactions and the approved award budget. This enhanced oversight allows for timely identification and correction of discrepancies. The UMA Finance Department has several initiatives underway which will mitigate the risk of similar mispostings in the future, including the implementation of a formal training program for staff as a preventative control. A monthly reconciliation and transaction level review process which will be completed with principal investigators is also being developed. These additional procedures are expected to be in place by May 2026 and will support a consistent and strong awareness of federal compliance requirements, award administration and University of Maine System policies and procedures. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Mark Mantey, Assistant Director of Finance, University of Maine at Augusta Planned completion date for corrective action plan: May 2026 If the United States Department of Education or other agency has questions regarding this plan, please call Darla Reynolds at 207-262-7743 or darlab@maine.edu.
The Office of Resilience respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025, on behalf of the State of South Carolina. The finding from the schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the numbers assi...
The Office of Resilience respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025, on behalf of the State of South Carolina. The finding from the schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS—FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 2025-036 Community Development Block Grant – Assistance Listing No. 14.228 Disposition of Audit Finding: The Office of Resilience does not agree this item rises to the level of a finding and could be sufficiently addressed with a recommendation. SCOR acknowledges this process could be improved and will act to better support this transaction going forward. Corrective Action: To provide additional support and clarification on the use of cost allocation percentages, SCOR Finance will create a memo to file each time the cost allocation changes. The current methodology is based on headcount and is subject to change frequently. At the beginning of each quarter, SCOR Finance will recalculate the cost allocation percentage based on agency headcount on the last day of the previous quarter. The quarterly updated allocation percentages will be the basis of allocating agency wide shared costs. A copy of the memo will be attached to the SCEIS payable document as support. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately. SCOR Finance will go back to the beginning of FY26, recalculate the cost allocation percentages, create the memo to file and post correcting journal entries as needed. Names of the contact persons responsible for corrective action: • Andrew DeRienzo - CFO at 803-422-0092 • Sarah Reynolds – Accounting Manager at 803-896-0038 • Tiffany Frye -Budget Manager at 803-896-6704
Westminster College Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Federal Program: Economic Adjustment Assistance Program, Assistance Listing Number 11.307 Finding 2025-001: Questioned Costs – Allowable Costs/Costs Principles (material weakness) Name of Contact Person: Gerald J. Ganz, Jr., Vice President, CFO Specif...
Westminster College Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Federal Program: Economic Adjustment Assistance Program, Assistance Listing Number 11.307 Finding 2025-001: Questioned Costs – Allowable Costs/Costs Principles (material weakness) Name of Contact Person: Gerald J. Ganz, Jr., Vice President, CFO Specific Corrective Action: To prevent recurrence, the College is implementing the following measures: 1. Enhanced Funding Source Review Procedures: The College will develop and enforce a standardized review process requiring staff to verify and document the original funding source for any expenditure prior to charging it to a federal award. This process will include mandatory cross-checking between project accounting records, bond expenditures logs, and grant reimbursement requests. 2. Strengthened Internal Controls Over Capital Project Accounting: The College will implement additional controls within the accounting system to ensure expenditures tied to capital projects are flagged and reviews for potential dual funding before being charged to any federal program. 3. Training and Guidance for Staff: All personnel involved in grant management, accounting, and capital project administration will receive updated training on Cost Principles under 2 CFR 200.400-200.406, with emphasis on allocability, reasonableness, and the proper handling of applicable credits. 4. Ongoing Monitoring and Review: Quarterly internal compliance reviews will be conducted to confirm adherence to the new procedures, and corrective measures will be taken immediately if discrepancies are identified. The College is committed to ensuring full compliance with federal regulations and strengthening internal controls to safeguard all funding sources. We appreciate the opportunity to improve our processes and will implement the recommended procedures to ensure the integrity of future federal program expenditures. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026
We have a multi-pronged action plan. We will clarify and review our accounting policies and procedures regarding payroll allocations with staff; We will create a more thorough documentation process of the basis for each allocation; We will review the assumptions used for allocations during the year ...
We have a multi-pronged action plan. We will clarify and review our accounting policies and procedures regarding payroll allocations with staff; We will create a more thorough documentation process of the basis for each allocation; We will review the assumptions used for allocations during the year and update them (as needed); We will include regular monitoring and review of payroll allocations.
2 3 8 »