Finding 1162232 (2024-005)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-11-12
Audit: 372043
Organization: Fair Haven, Inc. (IN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The organization lacks a written cost allocation plan for shared costs, leading to inconsistent and undocumented allocation methods.
  • Impacted Requirements: This deficiency violates federal guidelines requiring costs to be allocable, reasonable, and well-documented.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Develop and implement a written cost allocation plan, ensuring it outlines allocation methods and is reviewed annually for compliance.

Finding Text

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development #14.251 Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding, and Miscellaneous Grants 2024-005 Lack of Written Allocation Plan for Shared Costs (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.405(d), any cost allocated to a federal award must be allocable, reasonable, and based on a method that is supported and consistently applied. In addition, 2 CFR §200.403(g) requires that costs be adequately documented. A written allocation plan is essential to demonstrate that the allocation of shared costs is equitable and in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Condition: The Organization does not have a written cost allocation plan to document the basis for distributing shared costs such as salaries, occupancy, and administrative expenses among its programs and grants. Instead, management relies on grant budgets and staff judgment to determine which costs are charged to each grant. As a result, there is no consistent or documented methodology supporting the allocation of shared costs to benefiting programs. Cause: Management has not developed or implemented a written cost allocation plan. Cost allocations have historically been based on grant budgets or management's understanding of what each grant will support, rather than on a systematic and documented method. Effect: Without a written cost allocation plan, there is an increased risk that costs may not be allocated consistently or accurately among programs and grants. This could result in noncompliance with federal cost principles and potential questioned costs if expenses are not properly supported. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization develop and implement a written cost allocation plan that outlines the basis for distributing shared costs, including the allocation methodology, the types of costs involved, and the programs affected. The plan should be reviewed periodically and updated as necessary to reflect changes in funding or operations. Supporting documentation for allocations should be maintained and readily available for audit purposes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees and recognizes the importance of consistent allocation methodologies. Corrective Action: Increase the Cost Allocation Plan defining allocation bases for shared expenses, supported by documentation and reviewed annually.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees and recognizes the importance of consistent allocation methodologies. Corrective Action: Increase the Cost Allocation Plan defining allocation bases for shared expenses, supported by documentation and reviewed annually.

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1162229 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1162230 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1162231 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1162233 2024-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1162234 2024-007
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.251 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE, COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDING, AND MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS $745,172
93.497 FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SERVICES/ SEXUAL ASSAULT/RAPE CRISIS SERVICES AND SUPPORTS $331,727
16.575 CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE $232,788
16.320 SERVICES FOR TRAFFICKING VICTIMS $102,743
16.017 SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES FORMULA PROGRAM $62,048
16.588 VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN FORMULA GRANTS $32,948