Corrective Action Plans

FINDING 2024-003 Finding Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Catherine MM Lane Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-882-6426 clane@vincennes.in.gov Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The Clerks office will identify non- compliant activities to ensure that funds are being used appropriately and according to federal guidelines and principals. We will consult with the relevant personnel to ensure understanding of allowable and unallowable activities and identify areas that may need additional training. We will enhance our review and approval process and provide clear documentation requirements to our departments. Anticipated Completion Date: This corrective action plan will go into effect immediately.

CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendor –– Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($332,200). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. MANAGEMENT’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i), 200.320(a)(2)(i) and Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, these procedures will include 1) obtaining all relevant information pertaining to procurements involving federal assistance from any cooperative purchasing group, 2) obtaining quotations from three qualified providers where applicable and documenting those results, and 3) properly document purchases using federal assistance when the vendor meets the criteria as a sole source provider. These three (3) updated procedures will be implemented during the remaining months of the 2024-2025 fiscal year, and all subsequent years, for future purchases where applicable.

CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Voyager Sopris Learning ($49,117) and Questeq ($70,549). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. MANAGEMENT’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, these procedures will include 1) obtaining all relevant information pertaining to procurements involving federal assistance from any cooperative purchasing group, 2) obtaining quotations from three qualified providers where applicable and documenting those results, and 3) properly document purchases using federal assistance when the vendor meets the criteria as a sole source provider. These three (3) updated procedures will be implemented during the remaining months of the 2023-2024 fiscal year, and all subsequent years, for future purchases where applicable.

CONDITION: During my review of the District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public-School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000, were obtained for the following vendors: Pittsburgh Area Community Schools Deborah Coppula Allegheny Intermediate Unit CRITERIA: In accordance with 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, the District must obtain/document at least three (3) written or well documented price or rate quotations from a reasonable number of qualified sources for purchases of goods between $10,000 and $22,500 (threshold established annually). In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance requires price or rate quotations to be received from an adequate number of qualified sources for purchases above the micro purchase threshold of $10,000 and the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases of goods and/or services utilizing federal funds, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), 2) the 24 PA Statute 8.807.1, and 3) Section 2 CFR 200.300(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance regarding obtaining three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000. MANAGEMENT’S PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION: The School District’s will document at least three price or rate quotations for procurements over $10,000. All procurements over $10,000 will be reviewed by the Superintendent to see evidence that three (3) verifiable price quotes were received before authorizing the requested procurement and will be placed in a file for audit purposes. The timeframe for implementation is effective immediately.

Lower East Side Tenement Museum will adopt written policies and procedures, and standards of conduct as required by 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E.

We concur with the condition. 1. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Grants Manager 2. Corrective action planned: Grants Manager will be tasked with the following: ● Researching and understanding what items are allowable within each federal grant ● Ensuring each budgeted item is not already written into another grant ● Presenting a list of budgeted items and their corresponding fund codes at a grants meeting prior to submitting the budget ● Notifying the Business Manager when the budgets have been approved and that those budgeted items can now be allocated to the corresponding grant under their specific fund code ● Checking the expenditure report to make sure it accurately reflects what was written in the grant before submitting information to the state ● Reporting any errors in coding to the Business Manager to ensure an accurate representation of expenditures is reported before submitting to the state 3. Anticipated completion date: Implementation of the corrective action plan began March 15, 2025.

We concur with the condition. 1. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Grants Manager 2. Corrective action planned: Grants Manager will be tasked with the following: ● Researching and understanding what items are allowable within each federal grant ● Ensuring each budgeted item is not already written into another grant ● Presenting a list of budgeted items and their corresponding fund codes at a grants meeting prior to submitting the budget ● Notifying the Business Manager when the budgets have been approved and that those budgeted items can now be allocated to the corresponding grant under their specific fund code ● Checking the expenditure report to make sure it accurately reflects what was written in the grant before submitting information to the state ● Reporting any errors in coding to the Business Manager to ensure an accurate representation of expenditures is reported before submitting to the state 3. Anticipated completion date: Implementation of the corrective action plan began March 15, 2025.

Condition: The School District's controls did not prevent or detect and correct, in a timely manner, costs charged to the grant that were more than the related invoices. Planned Corrective Action: The Grant Accounting team will develop a standard operating procedure on review and approval of journal entries. The Grant Account Team will provide training to Grant Compliance staff members on the defined process. Grant Compliance Senior Director and Assistant Director will be responsible for ensuring journal requests are submitted following the outlined operating procedure. Grant Accounting staff members will review submitted materials to ensure no invoice is overcharged and then process journal request. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Jeremy Vidito, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: 3/1/2025

Finding 2023-004 Assistance Listings: 93.567 & 93.576 Issue: Eligibility documentation needed strengthening. Corrective Actions 1. Apricot Hard Stops – Mandatory ORR eligibility fields prevent enrollment without complete data. 2. Enhanced Case Notes – Case managers must document eligibility review and note interpreter use. 3. File Accountability – Physical files labeled with responsible case manager; cross-checked during audits. 4. Compliance Reviews – Compliance Coordinator conducts quarterly file audits. Responsible Official: Javid Siddiqi, Director of Immigration Services Implementation Date: Completed January 2025; quarterly monitoring ongoing.

VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS Develop a subrecipient contract template that guarantees compliance. Establish a fiscal and administrative subrecipient manual and procedure that describe fund management and compliance criteria. This manual will include monitoring procedures and standards forms. Establish an indirect cost policy to standardize the evaluation and approval for subrecipient. IMPLEMENTATION DATE During Fiscal Year 2025-2026. RESPONSIBLE PERSON Administration for Socioeconomic Development of the Family (ADSEF, by its Spanish Acronym)

The CDSS’ Disability Determination Services Division (DDSD) has implemented corrective measures to address inaccuracies in the Modernized Integrated Disability Adjudicative System (MIDAS) and Disability Case Processing System (DCPS) invoice review processes. This includes an internal quality control process to monitor and review additional invoice samples from Branches after they have been processed and reviewed by Branch Program Technicians and Branch Auditors. Additionally, the DDSD Central Support Services Branch implemented a secondary audit process and created a new Auditor role to routinely sample additional Medical Evidence of Record (MER) and Consultative Examination (CE) contracts. Findings are provided to branches to reinforce accuracy and assure compliance. The DDSD, also transitioned from MIDAS to DCPS, which provides more sophisticated fiscal controls. To remediate any inaccuracies, DDSD’s centralized auditor will assess findings and develop an action plan to prevent erroneous invoices. The CDSS ensures that all necessary controls are in place to verify the accuracy and proper documentation of invoices. The CDSS concludes that the sample size of 15 MER cases does not provide sufficient audit evidence that controls are not operating effectively resulting in a calculated $54,398 in potential costs. However, CDSS agrees with the finding and is committed to the control and mitigation of risk related to the audit recommendation. Estimated Implementation Date: Implemented Contact: Bernice Stanfield, Fiscal and Procurement Section Chief Central Support Services Branch Disability Determination Service Division California Department of Social Services

FINDING 2023-001 Finding Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance, and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Summary of Finding: (copied from SBOA Findings document provided) The Allen County Department of Health (Department of Health), a department within Allen County, was awarded the Health Issues and Challenges grant through the Indiana Department of Health financed through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) for the purpose of funding programs that focus on the improvement of chronic disease, specifically, elevated blood lead level reduction. The Health Issues and Challenges grant is a reimbursable grant, whereby the County received reimbursement on a percase basis at a stated rate for Case Management and Environmental Investigation activities performed. The Department of Health received federal receipts related to the grant in the amount of $130,479 during 2023. As part of sound management of the Federal award, the Department of Health was responsible for implementing a system of internal control that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The Department of Health did not properly design or implement such a system. Receipts of the program were adequately identified through the use of an account number within the County Health Fund (285) in the Allen County's ledger (ledger) which was unique to the Health Issues and Challenges grant receipts. However, the ledger did not adequately identify the expenditures of the grant program within the County Health Fund. Through inquiry with the Department of Health employees and review of unitprepared support of grant expenditures, we determined expenditures were made with grant funds during the audit period, however, we were unable to distinguish between the expenditures of the Health Issues and Challenges grant and all other activities of the Department of Health in the County Health Fund. Due to the lack of separate identification of expenditures in the financial records, we were not able to establish a population from which to audit the Health Issues and Challenges grant for compliance with the following compliance requirements of the program: 􀁸 Activities Allowed or Unallowed 􀁸 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles 􀁸 Period of Performance 􀁸 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment As such, the full award amount of $130,479, as reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, was determined to be questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Recommendation: We recommend that management of the Health Department establish a system of internal controls to ensure that grant award funds are adequately accounted for and tracked in such a manner as to determine the activity, receipts and disbursement, associated with the grant. ………………………… Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: JENNIFER MILLER (Finance Director) Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 260-449-7358 (Jennifer.miller@allencounty.us) Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding Explanation and Reasons for Disagreement: N/A Description of Corrective Action Plan: When we were informed of the outcomes of the SBOA audit and the subsequent needs for a corrective action plan (CAP) relative to their findings, we moved quickly to begin the development of the CAP. We feel this finding/issue could be easily remedied by following our normal procedure for grants, whereby we develop a new fund, craft a Fund Ordinance for approval by the Allen County Commissioners to establish said new fund, and then subsequently track all expenditures and reimbursements in the separate fund vs. utilizing a line item for deposits in the main Health Fund as was done with this grant (which lacked the ability to denote exact salary expenditures and such next to each payment as it was all done within the larger fund for all staff and expenses. We were not aware of this need. THE PLAN (which will be added as a new “Grants” section in our existing Finance Internal Controls policies): For all grants (reimbursable or deliverables-based), once a contract is near completion or upon execution, a separate fund will be created through development and approval of a local fund ordinance. All expenditures allowed by said grant and all reimbursements received by the grant funder will be tracked solely and only within the separate grant fund that is tied to the signed contract from the funder. If there are staff payments for salaries or benefits being reimbursed by a grant, we will ensure that: (1) the hours/minutes per staff member per pay period for all work associated with these grant duties are tracked appropriately so as to ensure we are invoicing the grant funder for the exact and accurate work hours (regardless of whether or not the grant contract specifies this be tracked or reimbursed per minute/hour, as most do not require this); and (2) these amounts will be noted alongside the expenditures in the grant fund for clarity upon invoicing or auditing. Anticipated Completion Date: We will follow this practice for any new grants accepted by the Allen County Department of Health effective 9/17/2024. This is the standard practice for most grants we have accepted, and therefore, we will not vary from this practice in the future even if given permission to do so.

CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors –– Houghton Mifflin-Harcourt ($509,919), Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($419,826), and Smart Solutions ($449,303). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. MANAGEMENT’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i), 200.320(a)(2)(i) and Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, these procedures will include 1) obtaining all relevant information pertaining to procurements involving federal assistance from any cooperative purchasing group, 2) obtaining quotations from three qualified providers where applicable and documenting those results, and 3) properly document purchases using federal assistance when the vendor meets the criteria as a sole source provider. These three (3) updated procedures will be implemented during the remaining months of the 2023-2024 fiscal year, and all subsequent years, for future purchases where applicable.

CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Saving Ourselves ($30,000), AGI Repair ($16,216), IXL ($19,218), Learning Systems Associates LLC ($25,425), AGC Education Inc. ($11,644), Apple ($163,505), Germ Solutions LLC ($160,070), Graham Security ($12,025), Curriculum Designers, Inc. ($27,875), RJ Rhodes Transit, Inc. ($24,845). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. MANAGEMENT’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, these procedures will include 1) obtaining all relevant information pertaining to procurements involving federal assistance from any cooperative purchasing group, 2) obtaining quotations from three qualified providers where applicable and documenting those results, and 3) properly document purchases using federal assistance when the vendor meets the criteria as a sole source provider. These three (3) updated procedures will be implemented during the remaining months of the 2023-2024 fiscal year, and all subsequent years, for future purchases where applicable.

This matter was investigated by both the AOS, the Allen County Auditor’s Office, and by board members of the RPC. GLCAP was met with and records from both RPC and GLCAP were scrutinized and matched. As a result, the duplicate payment made in the amount of $4,386 was returned by GLCAP to RPC and was deposited on 10/03/2024 into the Allen County Community Development Fund.

1. Cleveland UMADAOP will obtain written prior approval for any expenditure deviations from the originally approved budget. This topic will be covered when training occurs during the quarterly review of grant guidelines. 2. As part of its updated financial policies and procedures, Cleveland UMADAOP will seek to document all financial activity to ensure compliance with grant and federal guidelines. 3. As part of the updated financial policies and procedures, Cleveland UMADAOP will seek written confirmation from funders whenever there is a deviation from the terms outlined in the original award documentation. 4. As part of the updated financial policies Cleveland UMADAOP will be using the services of a virtual accounting firm that specializes in: a) standardized monthly financial reporting packages that will be reconciled to the approved budgets; b) standardized monthly close processes that lock transactions at the end of each month; and c) electronic document retention for A/P and A/R among other services.

FINDING 2023-001 Finding Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance, and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Summary of Finding: (copied from SBOA Findings document provided) The Allen County Department of Health (Department of Health), a department within Allen County, was awarded the Health Issues and Challenges grant through the Indiana Department of Health financed through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) for the purpose of funding programs that focus on the improvement of chronic disease, specifically, elevated blood lead level reduction. The Health Issues and Challenges grant is a reimbursable grant, whereby the County received reimbursement on a percase basis at a stated rate for Case Management and Environmental Investigation activities performed. The Department of Health received federal receipts related to the grant in the amount of $130,479 during 2023. As part of sound management of the Federal award, the Department of Health was responsible for implementing a system of internal control that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The Department of Health did not properly design or implement such a system. Receipts of the program were adequately identified through the use of an account number within the County Health Fund (285) in the Allen County's ledger (ledger) which was unique to the Health Issues and Challenges grant receipts. However, the ledger did not adequately identify the expenditures of the grant program within the County Health Fund. Through inquiry with the Department of Health employees and review of unitprepared support of grant expenditures, we determined expenditures were made with grant funds during the audit period, however, we were unable to distinguish between the expenditures of the Health Issues and Challenges grant and all other activities of the Department of Health in the County Health Fund. Due to the lack of separate identification of expenditures in the financial records, we were not able to establish a population from which to audit the Health Issues and Challenges grant for compliance with the following compliance requirements of the program: 􀁸 Activities Allowed or Unallowed 􀁸 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles 􀁸 Period of Performance 􀁸 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment As such, the full award amount of $130,479, as reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, was determined to be questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Recommendation: We recommend that management of the Health Department establish a system of internal controls to ensure that grant award funds are adequately accounted for and tracked in such a manner as to determine the activity, receipts and disbursement, associated with the grant. ………………………… Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: JENNIFER MILLER (Finance Director) Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 260-449-7358 (Jennifer.miller@allencounty.us) Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding Explanation and Reasons for Disagreement: N/A Description of Corrective Action Plan: When we were informed of the outcomes of the SBOA audit and the subsequent needs for a corrective action plan (CAP) relative to their findings, we moved quickly to begin the development of the CAP. We feel this finding/issue could be easily remedied by following our normal procedure for grants, whereby we develop a new fund, craft a Fund Ordinance for approval by the Allen County Commissioners to establish said new fund, and then subsequently track all expenditures and reimbursements in the separate fund vs. utilizing a line item for deposits in the main Health Fund as was done with this grant (which lacked the ability to denote exact salary expenditures and such next to each payment as it was all done within the larger fund for all staff and expenses. We were not aware of this need. THE PLAN (which will be added as a new “Grants” section in our existing Finance Internal Controls policies): For all grants (reimbursable or deliverables-based), once a contract is near completion or upon execution, a separate fund will be created through development and approval of a local fund ordinance. All expenditures allowed by said grant and all reimbursements received by the grant funder will be tracked solely and only within the separate grant fund that is tied to the signed contract from the funder. If there are staff payments for salaries or benefits being reimbursed by a grant, we will ensure that: (1) the hours/minutes per staff member per pay period for all work associated with these grant duties are tracked appropriately so as to ensure we are invoicing the grant funder for the exact and accurate work hours (regardless of whether or not the grant contract specifies this be tracked or reimbursed per minute/hour, as most do not require this); and (2) these amounts will be noted alongside the expenditures in the grant fund for clarity upon invoicing or auditing. Anticipated Completion Date: We will follow this practice for any new grants accepted by the Allen County Department of Health effective 9/17/2024. This is the standard practice for most grants we have accepted, and therefore, we will not vary from this practice in the future even if given permission to do so.

Historic Hudson Valley will adopt written policies and procedures, and standards of conduct as required by 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E.

Responsible: Thomas Hoover, Chief Financial Officer Corrective Actions: Updated Finance policies: Specify that documentation of review and approval of costs charged to federal grants be maintained and that costs are recorded in the appropriate grant funding period. Completion Date: July 10, 2024. Explanation: Policies have been in place over the coding of costs allocated to federal grants in compliance with CFR 200 and were enhanced in 2023 in response to an OJJDP/OCFO recommendation. Review and approval of costs after being approved by an authorized signer takes place in multiple steps and concludes with preparation of reimbursements and financial grant reports (FFR). In order to further demonstrate compliance as recommended, Management updated Finance policies to capture the documentation and approval of cost allocation methods and coding of costs to federal grants and maintenance of such documentation of Supervisory review and approval. Policies already in place specified that supporting and source documentation be maintained for at least 3 years, in compliance with federal grant requirements. In addition, the updated policy specifies that grant costs be recorded in the appropriate grant funding (fiscal) period. Four transactions sampled were partially or fully recorded in the incorrect funding (fiscal) period, though they were within the grant period.

Pioneer Works Art Foundation will adopt written policies and procedures, and standards of conduct as required by 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E.

FINDING 2023-003 Finding Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance Summary of Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Bri Lautzenheiser Contact Phone Number and Email Address: bri@blufftonindiana.gov Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Any transfers that happen, will be reviewed, and will have better documentation of what claims made the transfer happen and make sure supporting documentation is attached to the claim to prove the use of the transferred funds. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately

CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors –– Houghton Mifflin-Harcourt ($509,919), Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($419,826), and Smart Solutions ($449,303). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. MANAGEMENT’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i), 200.320(a)(2)(i) and Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, these procedures will include 1) obtaining all relevant information pertaining to procurements involving federal assistance from any cooperative purchasing group, 2) obtaining quotations from three qualified providers where applicable and documenting those results, and 3) properly document purchases using federal assistance when the vendor meets the criteria as a sole source provider. These three (3) updated procedures will be implemented during the remaining months of the 2023-2024 fiscal year, and all subsequent years, for future purchases where applicable.

CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Saving Ourselves ($30,000), AGI Repair ($16,216), IXL ($19,218), Learning Systems Associates LLC ($25,425), AGC Education Inc. ($11,644), Apple ($163,505), Germ Solutions LLC ($160,070), Graham Security ($12,025), Curriculum Designers, Inc. ($27,875), RJ Rhodes Transit, Inc. ($24,845). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. MANAGEMENT’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, these procedures will include 1) obtaining all relevant information pertaining to procurements involving federal assistance from any cooperative purchasing group, 2) obtaining quotations from three qualified providers where applicable and documenting those results, and 3) properly document purchases using federal assistance when the vendor meets the criteria as a sole source provider. These three (3) updated procedures will be implemented during the remaining months of the 2023-2024 fiscal year, and all subsequent years, for future purchases where applicable.

January 8, 2024 To whom it may concern: Southeast Conference (SEC) respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the fiscal year ending 6/30/23. Our independent single federal audit was performed by Mertz, CPA & Advisor, 3140 Nowell Ave. Juneau, AK 99801. The following finding was discovered, and a corrective plan has been implemented: Finding number: ALN Title: ALN Number: Federal Award Year: Type of Finding: 23-0001 reporting Economic Adjustment Assistance (EDA BBB) 11.307 October 1, 2022, through September 30,2023 Deficiency in Internal Control and Noncompliance Condition and Context: This was the first year that SEC needed to implement the reporting requirement to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Subaward Reporting System {FSRS) for its subawards as required by FFATA guidance. SEC did not make timely, accurate reports as required. While this did not in any way compromise federal dollars, SEC has committed to the following corrective action plan and will continue its rigorous oversight of its 13 subaward recipients. Corrective Action: SEC will review and assess all federal grant award agreements, the reporting requirements, and guidelines to follow for each. SEC has hired additional staff and delegated to them the role of reporting requirements for SEC upon completion of the assessment. Those reporting requirements include the following: • Send monthly reminders to all project managers for all new / updated contracts or sub award agreements signed to be sent out 5 days prior to the end of each month. • Compile all data received from project managers and record in tracking spreadsheets for each specific grant by the 5th of the following month. ARDOR • Send cover sheet and all contracts or sub awards signed in the previous month to SEC's Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for FFATA reporting by the 7th of every month. • Train finance staff for FFATA reporting and compliance guidelines, completed by 1/31/24. • Engage in semiannual compliance reviews with an experienced federal audit consultant. In addition to the FFATA reporting, the executive assistant will also review with the CFO all reporting requirements for all grants and contracts whether they are monthly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually. Once this review and assessment is completed, the executive assistant will develop an internal reporting calendar and execute the following: • Regular reminders based on reporting requirements to all project managers and the finance staff for all related progress and financial reporting. • Follow up with project managers and finance staff 10 days prior to the deadline to ensure all reporting has been completed. Anticipated Completion Dates: • Grant award review 1/15/24 • Development of compliance corrective action 1/20/24 • Implementation of compliance reporting 1/20/24 • Finance staff training FFATA 1/31/24 • Additional BBB finance technician training 2/05/24 Responsible individual: Robert Venables, Executive Director. SEC and their contracted CFO have discussed the corrective action plan and are working cooperatively to ensure that all deadlines are met for compliance and training. Thank you, Robert Venables Executive Director

Finding number: 2023-012 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Programs: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance listing #: 21.027 Award year: 2023 Compliance requirement: Allowable Costs Corrective Action Plan: College Unbound has increased its administrative capacity and has implemented internal controls to properly track, account for and report on grant expenditures. CU hired the Vice President for Student and Institutional Sustainability in 2023 and subsequently a Controller and Bursar were hired in October 2023 to support the growing needs of the college. The Chief Development Officer, Program Staff and the Financial Team including the VP, Bursar, Financial Aid, and Controller have developed routines and procedures to ensure we are using grant funds as intended and have proper documentation. We are in the process of developing procurement protocols to align with federal grant expectations. Timeline for Implementation of Corrective Action Plan: Currently updating procedures to ensure compliance for FY25. Contact Person: Diana Perdomo, Vice President for Institutional and Student Sustainability/CFO