In two (2) instances out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the date per the lease agreement did not agree to the effective date on the HUD Form-50059.
In two (2) instances out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the date per the lease agreement did not agree to the effective date on the HUD Form-50059.
In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the verification of the tenant’s income was not properly verified and/or calculated.
In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the verification of the tenant’s income was not properly verified and/or calculated.
In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the Inspection was signed by the tenant and management; however, the Inspection form was not completed. All lines were left blank.
In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the Inspection was signed by the tenant and management; however, the Inspection form was not completed. All lines were left blank.
In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the Initial Notice – Section 202/8 or Section 202 PRAC form was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the Initial Notice – Section 202/8 or Section 202 PRAC form was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the Quality Assurance Information form maintained in the tenant’s file, was not completed by the tenant.
In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the Quality Assurance Information form maintained in the tenant’s file, was not completed by the tenant.
In two (2) instances out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the amount reported on Security Deposit Agreement did not agree to the security deposit amount reported in the lease agreement.
In two (2) instances out of nine (9) tenant files selected for testing, the amount reported on Security Deposit Agreement did not agree to the security deposit amount reported in the lease agreement.
In nineteen (19) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Notification of Rent Increase was not signed by the Property Manager.
In nineteen (19) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Notification of Rent Increase was not signed by the Property Manager.
In eighteen (18) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Housing Quality Inspection report was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In eighteen (18) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Housing Quality Inspection report was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In two (2) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the HUD-EIV form did not verified the tenant’s income, nor was there any other verification of income for the tenant.
In two (2) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the HUD-EIV form did not verified the tenant’s income, nor was there any other verification of income for the tenant.
In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Notice and Consent for Release of Information (Form 9887) was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Notice and Consent for Release of Information (Form 9887) was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Applicant’/Tenant’s Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Applicant’/Tenant’s Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Applicant’/Tenant’s Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not dated by the Property Manager.
In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Applicant’/Tenant’s Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not dated by the Property Manager.
In fifteen (15) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Annual Recertification Letter, was not signed by the Property Manager.
In fifteen (15) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Annual Recertification Letter, was not signed by the Property Manager.
In four (4) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Annual Recertification Letter, was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In four (4) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Annual Recertification Letter, was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In two (2) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Certification/Recertification Questionnaire were not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In two (2) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Certification/Recertification Questionnaire were not maintained in the tenant’s file.
In three (3) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Certification/Recertification Questionnaire were not dated by the tenant.
In three (3) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files selected for testing, the Certification/Recertification Questionnaire were not dated by the tenant.