Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
57,705
In database
Filtered Results
54,617
Matching current filters
Showing Page
45 of 2185
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding: 2025-060 - DEC did not fully comply with Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act reporting requirements applicable to FY 25 Congressionally Mandated Projects subawards. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 66.202 Assistance Listing Title: CMP Views of Responsible Of...
Finding: 2025-060 - DEC did not fully comply with Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act reporting requirements applicable to FY 25 Congressionally Mandated Projects subawards. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 66.202 Assistance Listing Title: CMP Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): DEC agrees with the finding 2025-060. The errors and omissions were due to staff turnover, limitations of the legacy FSRS.gov reporting system, and insufficient review procedures. The FSRS platform allowed only one user per grant and lacked visibility for other staff, which contributed to reliance on PDF backups without timestamps. The incorrect subaward action dates were due to insufficient review procedures during the migration to the new and unfamiliar SAM.gov platform. DEC acknowledges the need for stronger internal controls and improved processes. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): DEC has taken steps to address the issues identified in the FFATA reporting process. To strengthen internal controls, DEC has further enhanced its existing written procedure by incorporating a visual verification checklist to ensure all data entry fields are accurate and submissions are complete. Staff have been trained on the new SAM.gov reporting and verification process to reduce the risk of errors. DEC will also implement a secondary review by verifying data entry directly in Sam.gov rather than relying on the PDF reports. As a final level of review the agency will conduct random audits on a sample of reports to verify compliance. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): February 27, 2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Myra Pugh, Division of Water Administrative Operations Manager
Finding: 2025-059 - Unliquidated obligations as reported in two of three tested SF-425 Federal Financial Reports were inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 66.202 Assistance Listing Title: Congressionally Mandated Projects (CMP) Views of Responsible Officials (state whether y...
Finding: 2025-059 - Unliquidated obligations as reported in two of three tested SF-425 Federal Financial Reports were inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 66.202 Assistance Listing Title: Congressionally Mandated Projects (CMP) Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): DEC agrees with the finding 2025-059. The department has established procedures and supervisory reviews in place for the preparation and submission of SF-425 Federal Financial Reports. The reporting errors identified relate to 2024 reporting activity and resulted from a misapplied filter within the encumbrance pivot tables, which caused State appropriations to be included in the federal share of unliquidated obligations. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): Revised reports were submitted to the EPA on December 26, 2025. To prevent future errors, DEC will reinforce existing SF-425 preparation procedures by documenting required report logic, including validation of pivot table filters and exclusion of State appropriations from federal reporting. Procedures will require confirmation that only the federal share of unliquidated obligations is included prior to submission. The department will also provide refresher guidance and targeted training for staff responsible for SF-425 preparation, including proper use of encumbrance tabs, pivot tables, and filters. This will ensure continuity of established procedures and reduce reliance on manual assumptions. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): March 31, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Christina McCoskey, DEC Finance Officer
Finding: 2025-028 - One of 10 employee timesheets tested did not support the charges billed to the Congressionally Mandated Projects (CMP) program. Questioned Costs: 2,273 Assistance Listing Number: 66.202 Assistance Listing Title: CMP Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees...
Finding: 2025-028 - One of 10 employee timesheets tested did not support the charges billed to the Congressionally Mandated Projects (CMP) program. Questioned Costs: 2,273 Assistance Listing Number: 66.202 Assistance Listing Title: CMP Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): This finding has been corrected. The Division of Community and Regional Affairs (DCRA) and the Division of Administrative Services (DAS) have reviewed and updated timesheet processing functions in DCRA. DAS has provided information and training to DCRA timekeepers and management staff on timesheet entry, timekeeping procedures, and time entry and review processes in the accounting system. Both DCRA and DAS management will continue to monitor time entry and timesheet processing to ensure that time is entered accurately. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): I The corrective action plan was fully implemented on January 31, 2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Nichole Tham, Division Operations Manager, Division of Community and Regional Affairs.
Finding: 2025-013 - In FY 25, AKSASP did not consistently conduct required utilization reviews for donated property to ensure the property was being used in compliance with the terms and conditions of the donation. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 39.003 Assistance Listing Title: Do...
Finding: 2025-013 - In FY 25, AKSASP did not consistently conduct required utilization reviews for donated property to ensure the property was being used in compliance with the terms and conditions of the donation. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 39.003 Assistance Listing Title: Donation of Federal Surplus Personal Property Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): SSOA/OPPM, State Property Office agrees with this finding Corrective Action (corrective action planned): As a part of the new monthly review process mentioned above (finding 2025-010), all completed compliance reviews will be reviewed for accuracy and compliance with federal requirements by the State Property Manager and the results compared to reports produced by AssetWorks, the state’s federal property system of record. In addition, The State Property Office will also conduct internal staff training on internal controls prior to the end of the calendar year. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The new utilization compliance review process has been implemented as of September 30, 2025, internal staff training was completed in December 2025. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): I Jonathon Harshfield State of Alaska Property Manager
Finding: 2025-012 - AKSASP staff did not conduct an annual inventory of federal surplus personal property. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 39.003 Assistance Listing Title: Donation of Federal Surplus Personal Property Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees...
Finding: 2025-012 - AKSASP staff did not conduct an annual inventory of federal surplus personal property. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 39.003 Assistance Listing Title: Donation of Federal Surplus Personal Property Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): SSOA/OPPM, State Property Office agrees with this finding Corrective Action (corrective action planned): To ensure the annual inventory of federal surplus property is completed timely, the State Property Office will shut down operations from 1 September to 15 September annually to conduct a full inventory as rolling inventories do not meet the requirements. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The state property office will close from September 1, 2026, to September 15, 2026, to complete the required federal inventory by the required due date of September 30, 2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Jonathon Harshfield State of Alaska Property Manager
Finding: 2025-011 - Alaska State Agency for Surplus Property (AKSASP) lacked internal controls for the preparation and submission of the quarterly General Services Administration 3040 State Agency Monthly Donation Report of Surplus Personal Property. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number:...
Finding: 2025-011 - Alaska State Agency for Surplus Property (AKSASP) lacked internal controls for the preparation and submission of the quarterly General Services Administration 3040 State Agency Monthly Donation Report of Surplus Personal Property. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 39.003 Assistance Listing Title: Donation of Federal Surplus Personal Property Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): SSOA/OPPM, State Property Office agrees with this finding Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The State Property Office has implemented a procedure that will ensure all GSA reports are reviewed for accuracy prior to submission by the State Property Manager. The reviewer will initial the report prior to it being filed. In addition, The State Property Office conducted internal staff training on the updated internal control procedures in December 2025. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The new GSA Report review process was implemented on September 30, 2025, internal staff training was completed in December 2025, with the State Plan of Operations also being updated. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Jonathon Harshfield State of Alaska Property Manager
Finding: 2025-010 - Internal controls to ensure applicants were eligible to receive donations of federal surplus personal property were not consistently applied. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 39.003 Assistance Listing Title: Donation of Federal Surplus Personal Property Views of ...
Finding: 2025-010 - Internal controls to ensure applicants were eligible to receive donations of federal surplus personal property were not consistently applied. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 39.003 Assistance Listing Title: Donation of Federal Surplus Personal Property Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): SSOA/OPPM, State Property Office agrees with this finding Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The State Property Office has implemented a two-step process with a monthly review to help ensure compliance with this requirement. The State Property Office also conducted internal staff training on the updated internal control procedures in December 2025. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The two-step review process was implemented September 30, 2025, internal staff training was completed in December 2025, with the State Plan of Operations also being updated. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Jonathon Harshfield State of Alaska Property Manager
Finding: 2025-027 - For two of two CCPF 2025 Quarterly Obligations and Expenditure Reports reviewed, key line items for current period obligation and current period expenditures were inaccurate, and actual square footage of completed projects was unsupported. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listin...
Finding: 2025-027 - For two of two CCPF 2025 Quarterly Obligations and Expenditure Reports reviewed, key line items for current period obligation and current period expenditures were inaccurate, and actual square footage of completed projects was unsupported. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 21.029 Assistance Listing Title: CCPF Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The department will review obligation and expenditure totals for all CCPF quarterly reporting periods and submit necessary corrections in the 2025 Q4 CCPF Financial and Performance Report. DCCED verified subrecipients actual completed project square footages and will include these figures in the 2025 Q4 CCPF Performance Report. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): This finding was corrected in the Q4 2025 CCP Financial and Performance Report, submitted on January 30, 2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Kevin Bartley, Grants Administration Manager, Division of Community and Regional Affairs.
Finding: 2025-026 - During FY 25, DCCED did not have procedures for the preparation and submission of reports under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act for Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund (CCPF) subrecipients. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 21.029 Assistance ...
Finding: 2025-026 - During FY 25, DCCED did not have procedures for the preparation and submission of reports under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act for Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund (CCPF) subrecipients. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 21.029 Assistance Listing Title: CCPF Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Community and Regional Affairs will draft FFATA reporting procedures. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): This corrective action plan was completed on December 15, 2025. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Kevin Bartley, Grants Administration Manager, Division of Community and Regional Affairs.
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-068 - For two out of 40 timesheets tested (five percent), the employees’ hours were inaccurately recorded in the State’s accounting system. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain w...
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-068 - For two out of 40 timesheets tested (five percent), the employees’ hours were inaccurately recorded in the State’s accounting system. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): I The department agrees with this finding and recommendation. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): Department management will implement additional training for time collectors and payroll entry staff and strengthen the review process to ensure the accuracy of timesheet entry moving forward. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): June 30, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Shanna Burns, Human Resources Consultant 5
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-067 - DOTPF’s statewide value engineering (VE) coordinator omitted one project with a VE analysis in the FFY 2025 annual VE summary report submitted to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagre...
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-067 - DOTPF’s statewide value engineering (VE) coordinator omitted one project with a VE analysis in the FFY 2025 annual VE summary report submitted to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding and recommendation. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The department has implemented additional controls and training necessary to ensure compliance. Current procedures have proven adequate as demonstrated during the audit period, but adherence to procedures for reporting necessitates additional training. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): June 30, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Michael White, Financial Services Manager
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-066 - Contractor certified payrolls for four of 11 construction projects tested were not submitted during FY25. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees w...
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-066 - Contractor certified payrolls for four of 11 construction projects tested were not submitted during FY25. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding and recommendation. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The department will implement measures to follow up with contractors and document attempts to contact businesses. Management will provide additional staff training regarding processes and procedures to ensure that the department is following up with due diligence. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): December 31, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Michael White, Financial Services Manager
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-065 - The indirect cost rate in two of 11 FY 25 consultant contracts tested (18 percent) were incorrect. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with thi...
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-065 - The indirect cost rate in two of 11 FY 25 consultant contracts tested (18 percent) were incorrect. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding and recommendation. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The department will ensure that DOT&PF follows applicable statute and policy. The department will implement additional controls by introducing a semiannual review of appropriate contacts within the department to ensure updated indirect rates are reflected. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): June 30, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Michael White, Financial Services Manager
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-064 - Four of four judgmentally selected engineering and design-related professional service procurements were not publicly noticed on the Alaska Online Public Notice System. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding;...
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-064 - Four of four judgmentally selected engineering and design-related professional service procurements were not publicly noticed on the Alaska Online Public Notice System. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding and recommendation. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): Department management and procurement officers will ensure that DOT&PF follows applicable statute and policy and will implement additional controls to ensure equitable and fair procurement public notice policies are followed. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): June 30, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Michael White, Financial Services Manager
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-063 - Three of 40 timesheets tested (eight percent) were entered into the State’s accounting system with incorrect coding. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The departme...
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-063 - Three of 40 timesheets tested (eight percent) were entered into the State’s accounting system with incorrect coding. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding and recommendation. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The department will reinforce timesheet entry and processing procedures, and the finance officer will provide additional training to administrative staff to avoid future errors. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): June 30, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Michael White, Financial Services Manager
Finding: 2025-044 - Auditors could not obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to verify compliance with Fish and Wildlife Cluster’s (FWC) equipment and real property management requirements. Questioned Costs: Indeterminate Assistance Listing Number: 15.605, 15.611 Assistance Listing Title: FWC Views...
Finding: 2025-044 - Auditors could not obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to verify compliance with Fish and Wildlife Cluster’s (FWC) equipment and real property management requirements. Questioned Costs: Indeterminate Assistance Listing Number: 15.605, 15.611 Assistance Listing Title: FWC Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): ADFG agrees that the policy and procedures for management of equipment, real property, and capital improvements are insufficient. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): ADFG will continue efforts to establish and implement procedures and training to ensure that all equipment, real property, and capital improvements are managed in strict compliance with federal requirements. For equipment management, ADFG will take the following actions: • Ensure capital and sensitive equipment is accounted for in IRIS through a fixed asset transaction (FN, FA, FM, FT, or FD). The FN process was implemented on July 1, 2024 and ties equipment to the purchasing document. However, additional work is needed to ensure the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) and Assistance Listing Number are consistently included in IRIS transactions to improve traceability and compliance. • Develop and implement standardized procedures for inventory management in IRIS in coordination with the Office of Procurement and Property Management, Department of Administration. • Create and distribute inventory logs for staff to use in remote locations to address challenges in retrieving inventory items during seasonal months. • Develop comprehensive training for staff involved in equipment management to ensure staff are well-trained and knowledgeable about inventory management procedures and compliance requirements. • Establish clear guidelines for the timely disposal of broken, failed, or obsolete equipment to ensure efficient and compliant disposal of unnecessary equipment. For real property and capital improvement projects, ADFG will take the following actions: • Real property records have been compiled and are pending upload to the federal TRACS system. Once this upload is complete, ADFG will develop procedures and tracking logs to ensure annual site visits are conducted and documented. • Develop department policies and procedures to ensure real property is managed according to federal requirements as authorized in grant awards. This effort will be coordinated with USFWS to ensure alignment with federal expectations. • Provide training to program and administrative staff on the Code of Federal Regulations requirements and proper management of departmental record-keeping logs, including site visit documentation and file maintenance. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): December 31, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Eric Verrelli, Procurement Specialist V Jessica Hood, Accountant 5
Finding: 2025-074 - In our testing of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, the required report was not filed during 2025. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 14.195, 14.249 Assistance Listing Title: Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (sta...
Finding: 2025-074 - In our testing of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, the required report was not filed during 2025. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 14.195, 14.249 Assistance Listing Title: Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): AHFC agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The PHD is in the process of incorporating the reporting requirements and monetary thresholds for the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) into our policies and procedures. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): July 1,2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Bryan Butcher
Finding: 2025-073 - In our testing of eligibility, there were seven instances where the required documentation for the tenant was not available from the project operating under Section 8 during 2025. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 14.195, 14.249 Assistance Listing Title: Section 8...
Finding: 2025-073 - In our testing of eligibility, there were seven instances where the required documentation for the tenant was not available from the project operating under Section 8 during 2025. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 14.195, 14.249 Assistance Listing Title: Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): AHFC agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The PHD is in the process of amending its record retention schedule to include all client eligibility verification documents. Once completed, this will ensure that all client files contain all required eligibility documents as well as the most current reexamination documents. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): July 1,2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Bryan Butcher
Finding: 2025-075 - In our testing of special tests and provisions, annual housing quality inspections did not occur for seven units at one of the properties operating under Section 8 during 2025. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 14.195, 14.249 Assistance Listing Title: Section 8 Pr...
Finding: 2025-075 - In our testing of special tests and provisions, annual housing quality inspections did not occur for seven units at one of the properties operating under Section 8 during 2025. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 14.195, 14.249 Assistance Listing Title: Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): AHFC agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The PHD has completed all annual unit inspections as identified in the finding and will continue to work with our landlords to ensure these inspections are completed as required. Additionally, we have updated our policies to comply with the Code of Federal Regulations and the Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contract. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): February 1, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Bryan Butcher
Finding: 2025-043 - A review of six FY 25 PCSRT subrecipients’ subaward agreements found that one did not include an accurate unique entity identifier that matched the subrecipient’s name. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsible O...
Finding: 2025-043 - A review of six FY 25 PCSRT subrecipients’ subaward agreements found that one did not include an accurate unique entity identifier that matched the subrecipient’s name. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): ADFG disagrees with this finding. During the audit, it was noted that the UEI listed in the subaward agreement contained a copy-and-paste error. This discrepancy was promptly corrected once identified. Under 2 CFR 170, the official compliance requirement for subaward reporting is the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) submission through SAM.gov. In this case: • The correct UEI was verified in SAM.gov. • The FFATA report contained the correct UEI and was submitted timely. • The correct subrecipient was paid, and supporting documentation confirmed the subrecipient’ s identity. These facts demonstrate that the federal reporting requirement was met and that the error was limited to the internal agreement. The issue did not result in improper payments, misreporting to federal systems, or a breakdown in internal controls. This was an isolated clerical error that was promptly corrected during the audit. It does not represent a significant deficiency or material weakness. This seems more appropriately categorized as a minor observation or management comment regarding document review processes. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): DFG will reinforce internal review procedures to prevent similar copy-and-paste errors in the future. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): N/A Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Jessica Hood, Accountant 5
Finding: 2025-042 - Two of four randomly selected FY 25 PCSRT SF-425 federal financial reports tested did not include the recipient share of expenditures. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agenc...
Finding: 2025-042 - Two of four randomly selected FY 25 PCSRT SF-425 federal financial reports tested did not include the recipient share of expenditures. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): ADFG respectfully disagrees with the audit finding regarding SF-425 reporting and recipient share. During the audit period, the federal awarding agency transitioned to a new reporting system but did not issue updated written instructions, revised award terms, or formal guidance clarifying new SF-425 fields or reporting expectations. Under 2 CFR §200.328, recipients are required to submit financial reports as specified in the Federal award, and agencies may require only 0MB-approved, government-wide data elements. No updated award terms or instructions were provided to ADFG during this transition. System behavior clearly indicated that certain fields were not applicable. In Grants Online, the fields were grayed out, signaling they were not required. In contrast, eRA Commons left these fields open without any explanation or guidance. NOAA now requires these fields, but this requirement was not communicated at the time of the transition. This inconsistency demonstrates that the agency had not finalized or communicated enforceable requirements for these fields during the reporting period. DFG acted reasonably and consistently based on the information available. It would be inappropriate to penalize DFG for continuing to report under prior requirements or omitting data in fields that were not previously required. The Uniform Guidance places responsibility on awarding agencies to provide clear written guidance, transition timelines, and clarification on new reporting requirements before they become enforceable. For these reasons, DFG requests that this finding be reconsidered. Our reporting complied with the award terms and the system instructions available at the time, and any changes introduced by the agency were not formally communicated or incorporated into our award during the relevant reporting period. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): We will contact the awarding agency to confirm whether previously submitted reports must be revised to include the recipient share. We will also verify if this requirement applies only to future reporting and adjust our procedures accordingly. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): April 30, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Jessica Hood, Accountant 5
Finding: 2025-041 - One of six Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Pacific Salmon Treaty (PCSRT) Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports tested was not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsibl...
Finding: 2025-041 - One of six Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Pacific Salmon Treaty (PCSRT) Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports tested was not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADFG) disagrees with this finding. The FFATA report for the FY2025 NOAA subaward was submitted one month late due to resource constraints while our team was actively implementing a corrective action plan (CAP) for a prior Office of Inspector General (OIG) federal audit finding related to FFATA reporting timeliness. During this period, we prioritized fulfilling the CAP requirements, which included a comprehensive reconciliation of all subawards across federal programs to ensure accuracy and compliance. This intensive remediation effort temporarily impacted our ability to meet standard reporting timelines. The delay was not the result of a new or separate control failure, but rather a timing issue directly tied to the corrective work already underway. Importantly: • The NOAA FFATA report was completed accurately as part of the same remediation workflow. • The delay occurred while addressing the previously identified issue and was resolved within the corrective action period established with the 01G. • The root cause was the same issue identified in the existing finding, and not a new or systemic breakdown. • Updated internal controls and revised procedures were implemented during this period and now apply uniformly across all programs, including NOAA. • These corrective actions have resulted in timely, comprehensive, and fully implemented processes designed to prevent recurrence. Given that the late NOAA FFATA report occurred within the active corrective action window and was resolved through the same documented process, we view this as part of the previously identified issue rather than a separate instance of noncompliance. The corrective actions were completed as planned and have strengthened our reporting controls to ensure ongoing compliance. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): ADFG has implemented formal policies and procedures to ensure timely processing and submission of FFATA reports, fully addressing the previous OIG audit finding. These procedures are now in place and actively followed, and ongoing monitoring has been established to verify continued compliance and prevent recurrence. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): Completed April 15, 2025 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Jessica Hood, Accountant 5
Finding: 2025-076 - The Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority’s (AIDEA) controls were not designed to detect noncompliance in program income reported in AIDEA’s annual report. During our testing of reports, we noted that the annual report tested did not report interest earned on deposit...
Finding: 2025-076 - The Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority’s (AIDEA) controls were not designed to detect noncompliance in program income reported in AIDEA’s annual report. During our testing of reports, we noted that the annual report tested did not report interest earned on deposit accounts. The amount of interest income not included on the annual report totaled 167,023, which represents the cumulative interest income earned for the program from deposits since inception Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.307 Assistance Listing Title: Economic Development Cluster COVID- 19 Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): Agree Corrective Action (corrective action planned): DCCED manages this program on behalf of AIDEA. DCCED will incorporate a new internal control procedure requiring that each year’s final EDA-209 report be reviewed and approved by AIDEA’s Controller or Chief Financial Officer prior to submission and includes backup that supports each number. This review step will ensure the completeness and accuracy of all future filings. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): 06/30/2026 (or the date of when the next EAD-209 report is due) Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): jkornmuller@aidea.orq, aleavitt@aidea.orq, andy.macaulay@alaska.qov
Finding: 2025-072 - Alaska Energy Authority did not have controls in place for review of progress reports for this program. During our testing of reports, we noted that two of the five reports sampled did not have evidence of a formal review before submission. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listi...
Finding: 2025-072 - Alaska Energy Authority did not have controls in place for review of progress reports for this program. During our testing of reports, we noted that two of the five reports sampled did not have evidence of a formal review before submission. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.859 Assistance Listing Title: Assistance to High Energy Cost Rural Communities Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): Agree Corrective Action (corrective action planned): Implement procedures to ensure that all compliance reports are reviewed by personnel independent of the preparer(s). Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): 01/15/2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Tim Sandstrom, Chief Operating Officer
Finding: 2025-050 - Daily SNAP EBT reconciliations were not performed in FY 25. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, bri...
Finding: 2025-050 - Daily SNAP EBT reconciliations were not performed in FY 25. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Public Assistance implemented a daily reconciliation and monitoring process and trained staff on the revised procedures. The division plans to be fully compliant and current in FY 2026. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
« 1 43 44 46 47 2185 »