Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
48,663
In database
Filtered Results
46,123
Matching current filters
Showing Page
113 of 1845
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Condition:
Condition:
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Recertification:
Recertification:
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
1. There was one (1) instance out of seventeen (17) tenant files selected for testing, whereby the annual recertification was not performed.
1. There was one (1) instance out of seventeen (17) tenant files selected for testing, whereby the annual recertification was not performed.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
2. In ten (10) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the HUD-EIV was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
2. In ten (10) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the HUD-EIV was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
3. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) was not dated by the tenant.
3. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) was not dated by the tenant.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
4. In three (3) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the housing quality inspection report was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
4. In three (3) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the housing quality inspection report was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
5. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the quality assurance information form was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
5. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the quality assurance information form was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
6. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the annual recertification letter was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
6. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the annual recertification letter was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
7. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the lease addendum for violence against women was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
7. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the lease addendum for violence against women was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
8. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the effective date on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 202/8 or 202 PACs form, did agree to the effective date on the HUD Form-50059.
8. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the effective date on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 202/8 or 202 PACs form, did agree to the effective date on the HUD Form-50059.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
9. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the rent amount indicated on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 202/8 or 202 PACs form, did agree to the total tenant payment on the HUD Form-50059.
9. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the rent amount indicated on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 202/8 or 202 PACs form, did agree to the total tenant payment on the HUD Form-50059.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
10. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the employment income reported on HUD Form-50059 was properly calculated based on the supporting documentation maintained in the tenant’s file.
10. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the employment income reported on HUD Form-50059 was properly calculated based on the supporting documentation maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Move-outs:
Move-outs:
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
1. There was one (1) tenant file selected for testing, the tenant file could not be located.
1. There was one (1) tenant file selected for testing, the tenant file could not be located.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that Ridgeview Terrace, Inc. should process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Ur...
Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that Ridgeview Terrace, Inc. should process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. In addition, a tenant file should be maintained for each move-out tenant. By performing these procedures, the risk of incurring questioned costs will be significantly reduced.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Actions Taken on the Finding.
Actions Taken on the Finding.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Correcting going forward.
Correcting going forward.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding No. 2024-001 Personnel Responsible For Corrective Action Plan: Ryan McClure, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: When required for a future procurement transaction Corrective Action Plan: The Foundation is aware of the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements and if necessary fo...
Finding No. 2024-001 Personnel Responsible For Corrective Action Plan: Ryan McClure, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: When required for a future procurement transaction Corrective Action Plan: The Foundation is aware of the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements and if necessary for a future procurement transaction, will follow the sealed bids or competitive proposals protocols.
Housing Opportunity through Modernization Act
Housing Opportunity through Modernization Act
The Tenant Selection Plans and EIV policies and procedures were not updated to reflect the Housing Opportunity through Modernization Act of 2016, rules and discretionary policies.
The Tenant Selection Plans and EIV policies and procedures were not updated to reflect the Housing Opportunity through Modernization Act of 2016, rules and discretionary policies.
(1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that Windham Housing Corporation, implement the Department of HUD, Notice H 2023-10.
(1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that Windham Housing Corporation, implement the Department of HUD, Notice H 2023-10.
(2) Actions Taken on the Finding.
(2) Actions Taken on the Finding.
Working on putting together.
Working on putting together.
Waiting List
Waiting List
In four (4) out of twelve (12) applicants/tenants selected for testing, there was no documentation provided, indicating that the tenant was placed on the waiting list.
In four (4) out of twelve (12) applicants/tenants selected for testing, there was no documentation provided, indicating that the tenant was placed on the waiting list.
« 1 111 112 114 115 1845 »