Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
51,636
In database
Filtered Results
48,833
Matching current filters
Showing Page
25 of 1954
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Comments on Findings and Recommendations: Management concurs with the findings and auditors’ recommendations to enhance internal controls to ensure compliance with the HUD Regulatory Agreement. Action(s) Taken or Planned: 2025-001: The underfunded replacement reserve deposit will be deposited into t...
Comments on Findings and Recommendations: Management concurs with the findings and auditors’ recommendations to enhance internal controls to ensure compliance with the HUD Regulatory Agreement. Action(s) Taken or Planned: 2025-001: The underfunded replacement reserve deposit will be deposited into the replacement reserve account as cash flow allows during fiscal year 2026. Furthermore, internal controls over replacement reserve funding are being strengthened to prevent future non-compliance.
The Organization has set up a system to review transfers of federal funding by the Senior Asset Manager and Chief Financial Officer prior to the transfer taking place to ensure it is within the compliance requirements of the grant
The Organization has set up a system to review transfers of federal funding by the Senior Asset Manager and Chief Financial Officer prior to the transfer taking place to ensure it is within the compliance requirements of the grant
The Organization has created a tracking system that identifies when the last inspection was completed and when the next inspection should be due based on the number of units at each complex. NOTE: Inspections are not due until June through October of 2027 for complexes under the jurisdiction of the ...
The Organization has created a tracking system that identifies when the last inspection was completed and when the next inspection should be due based on the number of units at each complex. NOTE: Inspections are not due until June through October of 2027 for complexes under the jurisdiction of the City of Salem.
a. Significant Deficiency - Condition: We noted in our testing of Twenty-First Century reimbursement that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted. B. Plan of action - The responsible officials recognize the need for an improved review process to ensure grant claims are accurate and pro...
a. Significant Deficiency - Condition: We noted in our testing of Twenty-First Century reimbursement that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted. B. Plan of action - The responsible officials recognize the need for an improved review process to ensure grant claims are accurate and properly documented. To address this deficiency, the following actions will be implimented: Role assignment: The Business Manager will prepare and submit each federal grant claim, and the fiscal assistant will conduct a review before final submission. This role assignment will ensure both preparation and indeprendent review are in place. c. Timeline for implimentation: New procedures will be established within the fiscal quarter, with training and full implmentation scheduled by 3/1/2026.
a. material weakness - Condition: During our testing of expenditures charged to the grant, we noted that a paymnet for contracted services was charged to payroll costs. The error was subsequently corrected by the district. Expendituresshould be charged to appropriate account codes. b. Plan of action...
a. material weakness - Condition: During our testing of expenditures charged to the grant, we noted that a paymnet for contracted services was charged to payroll costs. The error was subsequently corrected by the district. Expendituresshould be charged to appropriate account codes. b. Plan of action - The responsible officials recognize the importance of ensuring expenditures are charged to the appropriate account codes. There was a misunderstanding on the form that was filled out for the oregon department of education. This error was corrected with a journal entry. Additionally, the account codes used for federal awards will be reviewed for accuracy on an annual basis. C. Timing: Correcting journal entry was completed on 6/30/2025
Bethany College and Affiliate Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended June 30, 2025 Finding 2025‐001 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance – Return of Title IV Funds Condition Found: Four students who had withdrawn from the institution did not have Title IV funds returned to...
Bethany College and Affiliate Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended June 30, 2025 Finding 2025‐001 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance – Return of Title IV Funds Condition Found: Four students who had withdrawn from the institution did not have Title IV funds returned to the Department of Education within 45 days. Corrective Action Plan: The College will review our workflow and make oversight improvements to prevent future delays, including standardizing withdrawal notification and handoff procedures, initiating R2T4 calculations immediately upon withdrawal determination, confirming that required COD adjustments are submitted without delay and establishing internal tracking to monitor return activity against the 45 day requirement. Responsible Official for Corrective Action Plan: Sarah Sherinian, Vice President for Student Success & Operational Excellence/Chief Financial Aid Officer
Recommendation: CLA recommends the District review its grant disbursement process to ensure that there is adequate segregation of duties in regards to initiating, authorizing, reviewing for grant allowability and approving purchases, along with adding controls to ensure that the item purchased was r...
Recommendation: CLA recommends the District review its grant disbursement process to ensure that there is adequate segregation of duties in regards to initiating, authorizing, reviewing for grant allowability and approving purchases, along with adding controls to ensure that the item purchased was received by the District. CLA also also recommends the District printout the eligibility reports from Wisegrants and sign and date them to indicate review and approval after meeting with CESA 10 each year. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with this finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The District will note the date of the budget meeting with CESA 10. When items are purchased for Title I, approval will be made by either the Elementary Principal or Superintendent before purchases are made. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Brooke Rosemeyer, Adrian Foster, Brandon Baldry Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 1, 2026.
Child Nutrition Cluster (School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children) – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Recommendation: CLA recommends that the District review its internal controls and implement a procedure to ensure all re...
Child Nutrition Cluster (School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children) – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Recommendation: CLA recommends that the District review its internal controls and implement a procedure to ensure all reports required under the grant have a designated reviewer that is different from the individual responsible for preparing, even when there are gaps of coverage in preparer and reviewer positions, and that the review and approval happens prior to submitting the reports to the granting agency. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with this finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The Food Service Director and the Executive Administrative Assistant will work together to ensure that procedures are in place to review and confirm for accuracy. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Frankie Soto, Dawn Rausch Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 1, 2026.
Child Nutrition Cluster (School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children) – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Recommendation: CLA recommends the District review its procurement process to ensure that there is adequate segregation ...
Child Nutrition Cluster (School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children) – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Recommendation: CLA recommends the District review its procurement process to ensure that there is adequate segregation of duties in regards to initiating, authorizing, reviewing for grant allowability and approving all procurement transactions. CLA also recommends that the District review and update policies and procedures to help ensure that all federal grants with covered transactions have vendors reviewed for suspension and debarment status prior to entering into the transaction and that documentation of the status is maintained with the procurement history of each transaction that it is required for. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with this finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The Food Service Director and the Executive Administrative Assistant and District Administrator will work together to ensure that procedures are in place to review and confirm for accuracy. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Frankie Soto, Dawn Rausch, Adrian Foster Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 1, 2026.
Child Nutrition Cluster (School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children) – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Recommendation: CLA recommends that the District implement formal procedures to strengthen controls over eligibility det...
Child Nutrition Cluster (School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children) – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Recommendation: CLA recommends that the District implement formal procedures to strengthen controls over eligibility determinations. These procedures should include ensuring timely updates to eligibility listings when students become ineligible, retaining all required documentation for the applicable retention period, and conducting periodic reviews of benefit issuance listings to confirm accuracy. Additionally, CLA recommends the District implement procedures to ensure staff receive training on proper eligibility determination and recordkeeping requirements. Finally, CLA recommends the District establish monitoring controls to verify that benefits are discontinued promptly for students who no longer qualify. Eligibility determinations should be reviewed and approved by someone other than the person entering the applications and direct certification information into the software. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with this finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The Food Service Director, high school secretary and the Executive Administrative Assistant will work together to ensure that procedures are in place to review and confirm for accuracy. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Frankie Soto, Dawn Rausch, Emily Krzyzanowski Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 1, 2026.
The security deposit discrepancy will be rectified
The security deposit discrepancy will be rectified
The Salvation Army submitted a BBRI which requested increased rents and releases from reserves to pay accounts payable as well as approval of loans from the Sponsor to cover accounts payable that could not be paid from reserves. This would enable the reserves to be paid on a go forward basis. In add...
The Salvation Army submitted a BBRI which requested increased rents and releases from reserves to pay accounts payable as well as approval of loans from the Sponsor to cover accounts payable that could not be paid from reserves. This would enable the reserves to be paid on a go forward basis. In addition, the next step will be a BBRI for the RAD for PRAC conversion.
The Salvation Army submitted a BBRI which requested increased rents and releases from reserves to pay accounts payable as well as approval of loans from the Sponsor to cover accounts payable that could not be paid from reserves. This would enable the reserves to be paid on a go forward basis. In add...
The Salvation Army submitted a BBRI which requested increased rents and releases from reserves to pay accounts payable as well as approval of loans from the Sponsor to cover accounts payable that could not be paid from reserves. This would enable the reserves to be paid on a go forward basis. In addition, the next step will be a BBRI for the RAD for PRAC conversion.
4. Deficiency #4 – SA-2025-001 a. Federal Award Program – 84.425 ESSER During our testing of ESSER, we noted 2 employees where I9s were not retained. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District retain all I9s in accordance with federal law. b. The Director of Financial Services is in communication wit...
4. Deficiency #4 – SA-2025-001 a. Federal Award Program – 84.425 ESSER During our testing of ESSER, we noted 2 employees where I9s were not retained. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District retain all I9s in accordance with federal law. b. The Director of Financial Services is in communication with the Director of Human Resources regarding this issue. Human Resources is developing a review process to identify non-compliant i9s and implementing a new staff training program for proper completion, correction and replacement of I9 documents. c. This will be implemented as of June 30, 2026.
1. Hire a Revenue Cycle Liaison o Designate a dedicated Revenue Liaison who will serve as the primary trainer and subject matter expert for the Sliding Fee Discount Program under the Revenue Cycle Director. o Responsibilities include developing training materials, conducting onboarding sessions, and...
1. Hire a Revenue Cycle Liaison o Designate a dedicated Revenue Liaison who will serve as the primary trainer and subject matter expert for the Sliding Fee Discount Program under the Revenue Cycle Director. o Responsibilities include developing training materials, conducting onboarding sessions, and serving as the point of contact for SFDP-related questions. o Estimated Time of Completion: • 1–2 weeks for interviews and selection • 2–3 weeks for onboarding, access setup, and curriculum review • Liaison fully functional by mid-January 2026 2. Immediate Staff Retraining o Retrain all staff involved in SFDP on program requirements, eligibility criteria, and correct implementation of sliding fee determination and billing. o Training will include real-world scenarios, documentation standards, and compliance checkpoints to ensure accuracy. o Quarterly training will be conducted for all Clinic Managers, Front Office staff and Call Center staff. o The topics at these courses covered: i. The overall philosophy and purpose of collecting accurate data. ii. Definition of income; how to accurately calculate income. iii. Definition of family size / household. iv. The call center role in scheduling the patient appointments and how to set the document expectations. v. The importance of collecting all necessary forms and documents from patients in order to insert their financial status into MCC sliding fee scale. vi. How to enter accurate information into all the applicable forms in the EHR. vii. Operational workflow. o Estimated Time of Completion • Retraining will start after the Liaison is fully operational. • Retraining Start: Early to Mid-February 2026 • Retraining Completion: Late February 2026 3. Periodic Compliance Audits o Compliance department will perform independent audits of SFDP transactions on a quarterly basis. o Findings will be reported to senior leadership and incorporated into compliance risk assessments. o Findings will be used for ongoing training and process improvement across all clinics. o Estimated Time of Completion • First audit period: January–March 2026 • Report delivered: April 2026 4. Ongoing Staff Retraining Based on Audit Outcomes o Use audit results to identify gaps and retrain staff accordingly. o Maintain a continuous improvement cycle to ensure adherence to SFDP policies and minimize errors. o Estimated Time of Completion • First audit period: January–March 2026 • Report delivered: April 2026 5. Monthly Peer review o Each supervisor will review a random sample of applications from a different clinic (not their own). o Any discrepancies will be corrected promptly and communicated to the originating clinic. o Results will be tracked monthly to identify trends and target training needs. o Estimated start date will be in March 2026 o The result will be assessed to determine the duration of this review. Responsible- Multiple team members share responsibility for accurately documenting and preserving these records in the correct patient charts. This includes the Clinic Manager, Front Office Supervisors, and the Director of Revenue Cycle. Ultimately, MCC views this as a measure that the Chief Financial Officer and Director of Revenue Cycle all hold responsibility to ensure this policy is adhered to closely. Contact person for Corrective Action Plan listed above: Bharatha Naotunne, CFO Email: bnaotunne@marinclinic.org
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.994 Significant Deficiency, Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Reporting Finding 2025-010 – Repeat Finding Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.994 Significant Deficiency, Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Reporting Finding 2025-010 – Repeat Finding Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.334 the recipient must retain all federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. Condition: During the audit we tested 9 reports and noted the following: a) There was one (1) instance out of (9) nine reports tested where the submitted reports were unable to be provided, including the date of submission for the reports. b) There were four (4) instances out of nine (9) reports tested where the County was unable to provide evidence the report was reviewed prior to submission. c) There were two (2) instances out of nine (9) reports tested where the County was unable to provide the date of submission for the reports. Questioned Costs: None of the nonmaterial noncompliance items resulted in questioned costs. Effect: By not having the required documentation and underlying support, the County is not able to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements. Cause: The County did not have a formal policy to ensure documentation was retained to evidence review and submission of all reports. Recommendation: While the County made updates to policies and procedures surrounding reporting during the current year to address the prior year finding, the County should ensure these policies are adhered to ensure all submitted reports and underlying data are retained in accordance with the Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: As of July 2025, The Health Department has created and adopted policy FIS-05 Retention of Reporting Requirement Submissions to ensure that federal award reports and data are retained in accordance with Uniform Guidance. The Health Department will document with screen shots as outlined in the FIS-05 Policy, to address circumstances when the required report consists of answering a NCDHHS survey or form that does not have “save” or “download” capability, to maintain record of documented submissions. In addition, the Health Department has developed a standard operating procedure whereby fiscal compliance Management Analysts, in collaboration with Program Managers, ensure they have reviewed federal award reports prior to submission and file documentation of review and approvals. While review of grant reports is common, the Health Department did not have adequate documentation to demonstrate completion of this step prior to July 2025. An additional training, to be recorded, will be held with program staff Friday December 19th, 2025. Anticipated Completion Date: December 19,, 2025 Responsible Person(s): Autumn Watson, Business Operations Director
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Significant Deficiency and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Child Support Non-Cooperatio...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Significant Deficiency and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Child Support Non-Cooperation Finding 2025-008 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The County should have adequate documentation for each participant that supports each sanction for noncooperation. Condition: a) There was one (1) instance out of two (2) sanctions tested where the required form to be sent was dated after the sanction start date. b) There was one (1) instance out of two (2) sanctions tested where the sanction was not properly documented. Questioned Costs: None of the nonmaterial noncompliance items resulted in questioned costs. Effect: When required sanction notifications are not issued prior to the sanction start date and sanctions are not properly documented, there is an increased risk that clients may not be properly informed of program actions and that the County may not comply with program requirements. Cause: The County did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that required sanction notifications were issued prior to the sanction start date and that all sanctions were properly documented in accordance with program requirements. Recommendation: The County should implement procedures to ensure all required sanction notifications are issued prior to the sanction start date and that sanctions are properly documented in accordance with program requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this, which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: Performance Improvement Strategy: Collaborate with Child Support Services to improve understanding of their processes and ensure accurate case handling. Responsible Individuals: Sarah Carter, Tatyenne Rone, Karl Parisien, Denize Cuff (Sr. Quality and Training Specialist), Danisa Concepcion (Quality and Training Supervisor), Staphon Snelling (Training and Development Manager), Scott Fritz (Social Services Manager), Program Supervisors Training: Non-Cooperation Sanction Training Anticipated Completion Date: To be completed quarterly. Responsible Individuals: Sarah Carter, Tatyenne Rone, Karl Parisien, Denize Cuff (Sr. Quality and Training Specialist). Danisa Concepcion (Quality and Training Supervisor), Staphon Snelling (Training and Development) Anticipated Completion Date: Completed by January 2026.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Eligibility and Special Tests: In...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Eligibility and Special Tests: Income Eligibility and Verification System Finding 2025-007 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The County should have adequate documentation for each participant that supports each eligibility determination, and the information entered into NCFAST. We noted several errors related to the following compliance criteria: a) An OVS inquiry must be completed and agreed to information reported in NC FAST. b) For the month of application, Work First cash assistance payments are prorated from the date of application, with the date of application being day one. c) All Work First applicants must provide a Social Security number or apply for a Social Security number if they do not have one. d) Parents and step-parents who apply for children must be included in the case with the child, unless they are otherwise ineligible. Condition: The following are the results of nonmaterial noncompliance noted for each criteria listed above out of the 25 program participants selected for testing a) There were two instances where the OVS query was not run at the time of the determination. b) There was one instance where a hearing extension was incorrectly prorated. c) There was one instance where the social security number was not verified. d) There was one instance where kinship was not documented. Lastly, the following are the results of 60 program participants tested for control testing: a) There were three instances where the County did not remediate the errors identified within their internal review timely. b) There was one instance where a participant received benefits for one month where they should not have. c) There was one instance where incorrect forms were sent to a participant. Questioned Costs: None of the nonmaterial noncompliance items resulted in questioned costs. Effect: By not having the required documentation in the files or information being incorrectly documented, eligibility cannot be readily substantiated and there is a risk the County could provide funding to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: County oversight when performing reviews over applications. Additionally, the County does not have a formal process in place to ensure issues identified during the review process are appropriately corrected on a consistent and timely basis. Recommendation: Although these issues will occur from time to time considering the volume of case files, the County should review their processes to ensure proper supporting documentation of eligibility is maintained within each case file. Additionally, Mecklenburg County should consider implementing a formal policy for the requirements of having documentation corrected within a specific timeframe once identified and monitored throughout the year for adherence to the policy. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: Performance Improvement Strategy: The Economic Services Division (ESD) Quality and Training Specialist will conduct a 25% sample review of all ongoing cases. Errors identified during these reviews will be documented and communicated to both the Social Services Supervisor and the assigned Eligibility Specialist for correction within a defined timeframe. Failure to comply with correction timelines will result in corrective action. Case Review and Error Notification • ESD Sr. Quality and Training Specialist will review 25% of all ongoing cases. • Errors will be documented on checking sheets and emailed to both the supervisor and the assigned Eligibility Specialist. • Corrections must be completed within 5 business days of notification. Corrective Action • If corrections are not completed within the extended timeframe: o Corrective Action will be initiated in accordance with departmental performance management protocols. Responsible Individuals: Sarah Carter, Tatyenne Rone, Karl Parisien, Denize Cuff (Sr. Quality and Training Specialist), Danisa Concepcion (Quality and Training Supervisor), Staphon Snelling (Training & Development Manager), Scott Fritz (Social Services Manager), Program Supervisors Anticipated Completion Date: To be completed monthly. Training: Training Completion Required for the Following Quality Review Errors: • Ensure the OVS inquiry is completed, and that the information aligns with data reported in NC FAST. • Understand that Work First cash assistance payments are prorated from the application date, which is considered Day One. • Confirm that all Work First applicants must provide a valid Social Security number or apply for one if not already obtained. • Review and apply the rules of kinship, specifically regarding parents and stepparents. Additionally, train supervisors and eligibility specialists on the importance of timely resolution of quality sampling errors and how delays can impact audit outcomes. Responsible Individuals: Sr. Quality & Training Specialists, Quality & Training Supervisor, Training & Development Manager. Anticipated Completion Date: An email will be sent by the Staff Development Unit to the Eligibility Specialist with errors by January 2026, and in-person training will be completed by February 2026.
U.S. Department of Treasury Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Significant Deficiency – Procurement Finding 2025-006 – Repeat Finding Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.318 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-fede...
U.S. Department of Treasury Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Significant Deficiency – Procurement Finding 2025-006 – Repeat Finding Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.318 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of services required under a federal or State award. Condition: There were two (2) instances out of seven (7) contracts tested where the County did not properly follow the Uniform Grant Guidance procurement standards for contracted services. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: By not having the required documentation and rationalization in the files, the County could have improperly contracted with a vendor that was not considered eligible to be paid with grant proceeds. Cause: The County did not ensure all contracts utilized for the grant were contracted and properly documented using the required procurement requirements in accordance with the Uniform Grant Guidance procurement standards. Recommendation: The County should consider utilizing the Uniform Grant Guidance procurement standards for all County contracts or ensure new contracts are executed when federal or State grant funds are identified to be utilized for the contracts. Formal documentation regarding rationale of utilizing another organization’s bid process and retention of informal quotes and rationale of the vendor chosen should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this, which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Moreover, while this is identified as a repeat finding, it is important to note that the exceptions noted here were related to contracts entered into prior to the implementation of enhanced oversight that was implemented in response to those findings last year. Corrective Action Plan: The County’s procurement policy generally mirrors the Uniform Grant Guidance and procedures have been implemented to provide additional review of new agreements prior to execution to ensure that proper steps were followed in the selection process. In addition, the importance of comprehensive documentation retention in the areas noted above have been communicated to staff and a review of same will be included in the added review process. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025 Responsible Person: Teresa Rausch, Procurement Director
Program Name: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.557 Significant Deficiency – Eligibility Finding 2025-005 Criteria: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective...
Program Name: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.557 Significant Deficiency – Eligibility Finding 2025-005 Criteria: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: There were 6 instances out of 60 program participants tested for control testing where the County did not remediate the errors identified within their internal review timely. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Failure to promptly remediate errors identified during internal review increases the risk that program participants may receive benefits or incur costs that do not comply with program requirements, potentially resulting in noncompliance and questioned costs. Cause: The County does not have a formal process in place to ensure issues identified during the review process are appropriately corrected on a consistent and timely basis. Recommendation: Mecklenburg County should consider implementing a formal policy for the requirements of having documentation corrected within a specific timeframe once identified and monitored throughout the year for adherence to the policy. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: The WIC Sr. Quality and Training Specialist conducts quarterly monitoring by observing staff and completed random chart reviews. However, due to retrospective nature of audits significant time elapses between the occurrence of the error and its identification. Late corrections in the crossroads system will compromise data integrity and disrupt some of the certification processes in crossroads. Crossroads also lacks the ability to alert supervisors of missing documentation which in turn creates a huge administrative burden to monitor missing documentation in real time. WIC program leadership will create a policy that will address documentation standards. WIC staff will be instructed not to alter the original entry, instead a correction addendum will be documented to acknowledge missing data. WIC program will continue to provide policy refreshers every quarter to address these findings and provide staff updated information. WIC supervisors will review the quarterly audits results with their staff and ensure staff follow the standards set by the department leadership. The following the phases of the corrective action plan will be completed by March 31st, 2026. Phase 1: Review of Federal and State Guidelines Phase 2: Creation of Document Standard Policy Phase 3: Implementation of new documentation standards policy. Anticipated Completion Date: March 31st, 2026 Responsible Person(s): Ali Raza, WIC Director
U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.557 Significant Deficiency – Procurement Finding 2025-004 Criteria: Pe...
U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.557 Significant Deficiency – Procurement Finding 2025-004 Criteria: Per Section 200.318 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of services required under a federal or State award. Condition: The County did not properly follow the Uniform Grant Guidance procurement standards for contracted services tested. Specifically: a) There was one (1) contract out of two (2) contracts tested where the County did not retain proper documentation of the original bid process for a contract that was extended into the current year. b) There was one (1) instance out of two (2) contracts tested where the documentation of the rationale for utilizing a State contract was not properly documented. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: By not having the required documentation and rationalization in the files, the County could have improperly contracted with a vendor that was not considered eligible to be paid with grant proceeds. Cause: The County did not ensure all contracts utilized for the grant were properly documented using procurement requirements in accordance with the Uniform Grant Guidance procurement standards. Recommendation: The County should consider utilizing the Uniform Grant Guidance procurement standards for all County contracts to ensure proper documentation for contracts are maintained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: The County’s procurement policy generally mirrors the Uniform Grant Guidance and procedures have been implemented to provide additional review of new agreements prior to execution to ensure that proper steps were followed in the selection process. In addition, the importance of comprehensive documentation retention in the areas noted above have been communicated to staff and a review of same will be included in the added review process. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025 Responsible Person: Teresa Rausch, Procurement Director
Program Name: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.557 Significant Deficiency – Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Repeat Finding 2025-003 Criteria: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must esta...
Program Name: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.557 Significant Deficiency – Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Repeat Finding 2025-003 Criteria: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: There were 3 out of 40 samples tested where clear and consistent documentation of a control over allowable costs and activities was not present. Effect: Without consistent documentation and adherence to departmental policy for approving allowable costs, there is an increased risk that unallowable expenditures may be charged to the program, potentially resulting in noncompliance with federal requirements and questioned costs. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The departmental policy to approve expenditure documents as an allowable cost for the program was not followed. Recommendation: The County should consistently follow departmental policy by ensuring all expenditure documents for the program are properly reviewed and approved as allowable costs before being approved for payment and maintain clear documentation of controls over program activities to support compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Correction Action Plan: Program leadership will collaborate with the County Finance Team to ensure departmental policy is followed when purchases are made using WIC Federal funds. Internal purchase approval documents will be created to enhance the approval workflow. All purchases will be submitted to the WIC Program Director for approval. The program Director and the Sr. Admin Assistant will review the orders and ensure they are allowable items per the NC State WIC program guidelines. A shared folder will be created to save the purchase order forms, and the invoices to ensure Mecklenburg County Health Department Policy A-13, Retention of Administrative Documents is followed. The following the phases of the corrective action plan will be completed by March 1st, 2026. Phase 1: Review of Federal and State Guidelines Phase 2: Mecklenburg County Procurement Policy Review Phase 3: Creation and Implementation of new internal purchase approval processes. Phase 4: Staff Training Anticipated Completion Date: March 1st, 2026 Responsible Person(s): Ali Raza, WIC Director
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.778 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health an...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.778 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Children's Health Insurance Program Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.767 Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance - Eligibility Finding 2025-002 - Repeat Finding Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The County should have adequate documentation for each participant that supports each eligibility determination, and the information entered into NCFAST. We noted several errors related to the following compliance criteria: a) Self-attestation wages should be compared to information in NC FAST. b) All countable resources should be confirmed and recalculated and ensure they are computed accurately in NC FAST. c) The caseworker should prepare and submit a DMA-5097 form in the case of incompatible income verification and self-attestation income as described in the Eligibility Review Document. d) Citizenship should be documented within NCFAST. e) Household information should be entered correctly into NCFAST. Condition: The following are the results of nonmaterial noncompliance noted for each criteria listed above out of the 124 program participants selected for testing: a) There were six instances where the participants self-attest wages did not agree to the wages entered into NC FAST. b) There was one instance where the countable resources were inaccurate within NC FAST. c) There were five instances where the income was incompatible between the income verification and self-attestation income but no DMA-5097 was sent. d) There was one instance where the participant's citizenship was not documented in NCFAST. e) There was one instance where the participant's household size was entered incorrectly into NCFAST. Lastly, there were 6 instances out of 60 program participants tested for control testing where the County did not remediate the errors identified within their internal review timely. Context: There were 8 out of 124 unique participants tested with the errors noted above. Questioned Costs: We noted no federal questioned costs for the County as the State of North Carolina makes all benefit payments to participants directly. Due to split eligibility determinations between the Counties and the State of North Carolina for Medicaid, we found $25,105 in benefit payments made by the State of North Carolina to ineligible participants based on an improper eligibility determinations at the County related to three individuals in item "a" above. Effect: By not having the required documentation in the files or information being incorrectly documented, eligibility cannot be readily substantiated and there is a risk the County could provide funding to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: County oversight when performing reviews over applications. Additionally, the County does not have a formal process in place to ensure issues identified during the review process are appropriately corrected on a consistent and timely basis. Recommendation: Although these issues will occur from time to time considering the volume of case files, the County should review their processes to ensure proper supporting documentation of eligibility is maintained within each case file. Additionally, Mecklenburg County should consider implementing a formal policy for the requirements of having documentation corrected within a specific timeframe once identified and monitored throughout the year for adherence to the policy. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: Performance Improvement Strategy: The County has identified specific opportunities to strengthen accuracy and consistency in eligibility case documentation. While overall performance has improved, with total errors reduced from 14 the prior audit period to 8 in the current period, continued focus is necessary to further reduce errors and sustain compliance across case files. The Economic Services Division Strategies are as follows: • Social Services Supervisors will conduct targeted reviews of identified error trends, emphasizing policy application, documentation completeness, and process standardization to ensure consistent eligibility determinations across the program. • The Economic Services Division's Staff Development Unit will continue to quality sample cases to promote accuracy and accountability. • Social Service Supervisors, in coordination with Medicaid Social Services Managers will coach staff based on audit findings, monitor trends and ensure required corrections are completed within 5 business days of notification. • Failure to complete corrections within the approved timeframe will result in corrective action to both the Social Services Supervisor and the assigned Eligibility Specialist in accordance with departmental performance management protocols. • Supervisory staff will ensure all updates to the Quality Sampling Tracking Log are finalized no later than the 20th calendar day of the subsequent month to support timely monitoring, trend analysis, and corrective action. These actions are designed to strengthen internal controls, support staff performance and maintain compliance with applicable state and federal requirements. Responsible lndividual(s): Kim Konior, Lynn Martin (Medicaid Program Managers), Staphon Snelling (Training and Development Manager), Danisa Concepion, Donnie Munson (Quality and Training Supervisors), and Social Services Medicaid Supervisors. Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing Training: The Economic Services Division's Staff Development Unit will review the Single Audit findings and develop targeted training for staff responsible for determining Medicaid eligibility, as well as their supervisors and managers. This training will specifically address the errors identified in the audit and will be delivered by the end of March 2026. In addition, Staff Development will provide quarterly training to Medicaid eligibility staff, supervisors, and managers based on error trends identified through quality sampling conducted by the unit. To ensure effectiveness, a structured training approach will be used: • A pre-test will assess staffs current understanding of relevant policies. • The County will deliver targeted training materials tailored to address identified gaps. • A post-test will be developed, with a minimum passing score of 90%. This approach will allow the County to: • Measure knowledge gained through the training • Track training completion, identify staff who have or have not completed the training • Ensure consistent understanding and application of policy across the team Staff who do not achieve the required score will receive additional refresher training to reinforce key concepts and ensure compliance. Responsible lndividual(s): Staphon Snelling (Training and Development Manager), Danisa Concepion, and Donnie Munson (Quality and Training Supervisors), and Sr. Quality and Training Specialists (Medicaid). Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2026
The administrative assistant will prepare the "claims summary" forms by obtaining the number of meals served directly from the "Meal Count Edit Form." The Treasurer or Superintendent will also review the "claims summary" forms and supporting documentation for accuracy prior to the electronic submiss...
The administrative assistant will prepare the "claims summary" forms by obtaining the number of meals served directly from the "Meal Count Edit Form." The Treasurer or Superintendent will also review the "claims summary" forms and supporting documentation for accuracy prior to the electronic submissions. Corresponding documents will be manually signed and dated to indicate approval.
2025-004 Distance Learning and Telemedicine – ALN No. 10.855 Internal Controls over Compliance: Recommendation: We recommend that the District’s established cash management policy is followed to ensure timely disbursement of advanced grant funds, and advances of funds are requested to correspond wit...
2025-004 Distance Learning and Telemedicine – ALN No. 10.855 Internal Controls over Compliance: Recommendation: We recommend that the District’s established cash management policy is followed to ensure timely disbursement of advanced grant funds, and advances of funds are requested to correspond with anticipated payment of invoices. Action Taken: Management agrees with the recommendations. The cash management policy will be followed, and request of funds will be timed to correspond with the anticipated payment of invoices. Proposed Completion Date: March 31, 2026
« 1 23 24 26 27 1954 »