Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,436
In database
Filtered Results
58,188
Matching current filters
Showing Page
11 of 2328
25 per page

Filters

Clear
We recommend that the District adopt written procurement policies and procedures that comply with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, including procurement methods, contract administration, and documentation. We also recommend that the District develop and implement procedures to verify and document...
We recommend that the District adopt written procurement policies and procedures that comply with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, including procurement methods, contract administration, and documentation. We also recommend that the District develop and implement procedures to verify and document that vendors and contractors have not been suspended or debarred prior to contract awards or making purchases.; Management's Response: The District Concurs with the finding.; Responsible Individual: Deputy Manager Meegan Nagy; Corrective Action Plan: The District will develop a written procurement policy that will include compliance with the procurement standards of the Unfiorm Guidance with the use of Federal funding.
Finding: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.512(a), the audit must be completed and the reporting package, which includes the Data Collection Form (SF-SAC), must be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine...
Finding: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.512(a), the audit must be completed and the reporting package, which includes the Data Collection Form (SF-SAC), must be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Recommendation: The Organization should review internal controls and implement necessary procedures to ensure that accounting processes are completed timely so the audit can be completed within the parameters of the due date. Action to be taken: management review procedures will be implemented to ensure all future submissions are completed within the deadlines required by Uniform Guidance. Responsible person - Tony Postma, Interim Chief Financial Officer.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Management identified the VAT overcharge prior to the audit and requested a refund from the staffing agency. The staffing agency issued a credit of approximately $200,000 in 2026. Management identified approximately $40,000 that cou...
Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Management identified the VAT overcharge prior to the audit and requested a refund from the staffing agency. The staffing agency issued a credit of approximately $200,000 in 2026. Management identified approximately $40,000 that could have been allocated back to certain affected awards. However, because some awards were closed, actual credits or adjustments program expenses and budgets were not applied. Management will enhance its review process over staffing agency invoices and vendor credits to ensure costs and related credits are reviewed for allowability, allocability, and proper award-level treatment. Name and Title of Responsible Officials: Oliver Rivers, Chief Operating Officer and Deniz Sarkinovic, Senior Director of Compliance Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2026
Views of Responsible Officials: We acknowledge this lapse. We have already updated procedures to ensure that we are registering subgrants correctly. Name and Title of Responsible Officials: Oliver Rivers, Chief Operating Officer and Deniz Sarkinovic, Senior Director of Compliance Anticipated Complet...
Views of Responsible Officials: We acknowledge this lapse. We have already updated procedures to ensure that we are registering subgrants correctly. Name and Title of Responsible Officials: Oliver Rivers, Chief Operating Officer and Deniz Sarkinovic, Senior Director of Compliance Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2026
Condition The Institute does not have a written procurement policy. Additionally, the Institute does not perform suspension and debarment verification (e.g., checking the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) or equivalent excluded parties list) prior to entering into contracts or agreements with ve...
Condition The Institute does not have a written procurement policy. Additionally, the Institute does not perform suspension and debarment verification (e.g., checking the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) or equivalent excluded parties list) prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors, contractors, or subrecipients. Criteria Organizations that receive federal funding are generally required, under 2 CFR § 200.318–200.327 (Uniform Guidance), to: • Maintain written procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal, state, and local laws; • Ensure procurement transactions are conducted in a manner providing full and open competition; • Verify that contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs, per 2 CFR § 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180. Cause The Institute has not formalized its procurement practices in a written policy and staff is not currently required to check suspension and debarment status as part of the vendor selection or contracting process. Effect Without a written procurement policy, the Institute lacks a consistent, auditable standard for procurement decisions, increasing the risk of non-compliance, favoritism, or inconsistent practices across departments. The absence of suspension and debarment checks creates risk that the Institute could enter into agreements with parties who are legally excluded from receiving federal funds, potentially resulting in disallowed costs, reputational harm, or loss of funding. Recommendation The Institute should develop and formally adopt a written procurement policy that addresses methods of procurement, competition requirements, documentation standards, and conflict-of-interest provisions consistent with 2 CFR § 200.318–200.327. The Institute should also implement a documented procedure requiring suspension and debarment verification (via SAM.gov or equivalent) for all vendors, contractors, and subrecipients prior to contract execution, and retain evidence of this check in procurement files. Management Response Management agrees with the finding and recommendation. The Institute is formalizing its procurement practices in a written procurement policy consistent with applicable Uniform Guidance requirements. The policy addresses procurement methods, competition, documentation, conflicts of interest, and suspension and debarment requirements for procurements in accordance with federal regulations. Action Taken The Institute contracted with Visual Compliance to assist with verifying vendors against all available U.S. debarred and suspended lists before entering into covered contracts or agreements with vendors, contractors, or subrecipients. The Institute has developed and approved a Suspension and Debarment policy and staff are required to check suspension and debarment status as part of the vendor selection or contracting process. The Institute is developing a written procurement policy. Evidence of the verification will be retained with the applicable procurement or agreement documentation.
Condition During testing of cash disbursements, the audit team was unable to locate adequate supporting documentation for selected transactions sufficient to determine whether the costs charged were allowable and the activities were allowed under the applicable federal award(s). Documentation such a...
Condition During testing of cash disbursements, the audit team was unable to locate adequate supporting documentation for selected transactions sufficient to determine whether the costs charged were allowable and the activities were allowed under the applicable federal award(s). Documentation such as invoices, receipts, contracts, approvals, or evidence linking the expenditure to an allowable activity could not be located or provided by the Institute. Criteria Per 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to a federal award must be necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented. Per 2 CFR § 200.302 and § 200.334, non-federal entities must maintain financial records, including source documentation (e.g., invoices, receipts, canceled checks, time and effort records) that support the allowability, allocability, and reasonableness of costs charged to federal awards, and these records must be retained and readily accessible for a minimum of three years. Additionally, 2 CFR § 200.404 and § 200.405 require that costs be allocable and consistently applied to allowable program activities. Cause The Institute's recordkeeping and document retention practices did not ensure that supporting documentation for cash disbursements was consistently maintained, organized, or readily retrievable. This may be attributable to insufficient internal controls over document retention, lack of a centralized filing/records system, or turnover in staff responsible for maintaining disbursement records. Effect Without adequate supporting documentation, the Institute cannot demonstrate that disbursed funds were used for allowable costs and allowed activities in accordance with the terms of the federal award(s). This exposes the Institute to the risk of questioned costs, disallowed expenditures, required repayment to the funding agency, and potential findings of noncompliance in future audits. It also limits the Institute's ability to demonstrate accountability and stewardship over federal funds. Recommendation We recommend that the Institute strengthen internal controls over cash disbursements to ensure supporting documentation (invoices, receipts, approvals, and evidence of allowable activity) is obtained and retained for every transaction prior to disbursement. The Institute should implement a centralized, organized recordkeeping system (physical or electronic) for disbursement documentation, with clear responsibility assigned for maintenance and retrieval. The Institute should also provide training to relevant staff on documentation retention requirements under 2 CFR Part 200. Management’s Response Management agrees with the finding and recommendation. The Institute recognizes that complete and readily retrievable supporting documentation is necessary to demonstrate the allowability, allocability, and reasonableness of costs charged to all awards. Management will strengthen its cash disbursement and record-retention procedures to ensure invoices, receipts, approvals, contracts, and other applicable supporting documentation are maintained for each transaction. Action Taken The Institute implemented a centralized electronic recordkeeping process for cash disbursement documentation and assigned responsibility for maintaining and retrieving supporting records. Documentation supporting the expenditure and applicable approvals are retained with the transaction records. Relevant staff have been instructed on documentation and record-retention requirements applicable to federal awards. Management will hold an annual training at the beginning of the new fiscal year available to all ERI employees.
Condition In accordance with provisions of 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F, the filing of the data collection form and submission of audited financial statement to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse is to be completed within 9 months of the fiscal year end. The Institute did not complete the filing within 9 m...
Condition In accordance with provisions of 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F, the filing of the data collection form and submission of audited financial statement to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse is to be completed within 9 months of the fiscal year end. The Institute did not complete the filing within 9 months of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Criteria The filing of the data collection form and audited financial statement are due to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 9 months after the end of the audit period. Cause Due to change to new audit firm, locating supporting documents for items selected for testing and errors in the general ledger reconciliations, the audited financial statements were not completed timely. Effect The required reporting was not completed until August 2026. Recommendation The Institute should put procedures in place to ensure accurate reporting of general ledger accounts and locating supporting documents so reporting to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse can be completed within 9 months of the fiscal year end. Management’s Response Management agrees with the finding and recommendation. There has been a change in leadership at the Institute. The Institute recognizes the importance of completing the annual audit and submitting the data collection form and audited financial statements to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the required nine-month period. Management will move from paper-based to an electronic system in order to facilitate future audits or document requests. We will strengthen year-end close and audit preparation procedures, including monthly reconciliation of general ledger accounts, organization of supporting documentation, and coordination with the independent auditors to support timely completion of future audits. Action Taken The Institute has established an audit preparation and close schedule with assigned responsibilities and target completion dates. General ledger accounts will be reviewed and reconciled monthly and as part of the year-end close, and audit supporting documentation will be organized and maintained in a centralized location to facilitate timely retrieval. Management will monitor the audit timeline and outstanding requests to support submission to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the required deadline.
AUDIT FINDINGS Finding No. 2025-002: Allocation of Shared costs Corrective Action: Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland (PBRC) is looking into an upgrade to its system to ensure correct allocations of all cost taking advantage of the latest Accounts Payable software. Name of Contact Person: Amy M Sm...
AUDIT FINDINGS Finding No. 2025-002: Allocation of Shared costs Corrective Action: Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland (PBRC) is looking into an upgrade to its system to ensure correct allocations of all cost taking advantage of the latest Accounts Payable software. Name of Contact Person: Amy M Smitherman, amy.smitherman@gmail.com, 646-240-3185 Projected Completion Date: 10/15/2026 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Finding Reference Number: Finding No. 2025-001: Audit Adjustments Corrective Action: Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland (PBRC) will work with our accounting firm to ensure that the appropriate steps are taken. Name of Contact Person: Amy M Smitherman, amy.smitherman@gmail.com, 646-240-3185 Projected Completion Date: 10/1/2026
Finding: 2025-001 and 2025-002 Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Housing Choice Vouchers Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition Identified: During the audit review of 40 participant files tested for compliance with eligibility, annual reevaluations, ten...
Finding: 2025-001 and 2025-002 Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Housing Choice Vouchers Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition Identified: During the audit review of 40 participant files tested for compliance with eligibility, annual reevaluations, tenant rent, utility allowances, and housing assistance payment requirements, the audit identified the following errors: o 15 files were not completed in a timely manner. o 1 file miscalculated the total tenant payment due to incorrect deductions applied. o 9 instances of misaligned utility responsibility across HAP Contract and Lease Agreement. Corrective Action Plan The Ferndale Housing Commission is committed to correcting all findings and ensuring accuracy in file completion, correct participant deductions, as well as correct utility responsibilities in the future. It is worth noting that the FHC was not made aware of the Zip-Code payment standards until 2026, although during a shortfall meeting held on August 25, 2025, the utility payment standards were mentioned and confirmed that they were pulled from the HUD SAFMR website, nothing regarding zip code payment standards were mentioned. Planned Corrective Actions The following actions have been implemented to ensure accuracy in reporting: All annual and interim rent certifications will be reviewed by management for accuracy prior to being accepted and submitted. o The zip code payment standards will be implemented after the HUD required mandatory one-year waiting period. The transition was explained in a letter sent to all HCV participants. o The Ferndale Housing Commission has repositioned staff to bring delinquent annual/interim reexaminations current. The restructuring was based on the strengths of the staff and has resulted in greatly reduced instances of delayed reexaminations. o All files will be reviewed for accuracy by management before submission to PIC to ensure correct uniformity and correct calculation of income, deductions, allowances, assets, payment standards, and utility responsibilities. Staff Training and Management Overview o The FHC has established mandatory weekly meetings to discuss file accuracy and ensure all staff follow the same rules, regulations, payment standards, deductions, allowances. o During the mandatory meetings, the HUD 50058 forms will be used as teaching tools and completed by hand by each staff member to ensure full understanding of the 50058 and accuracy in reporting responsibilities. o There have been monthly delayed annual recertification reports pulled and discussed with staff, with deadlines provided to bring all reports current. Strengthened Internal Controls The FHC has established checklists to be included in each file during reexamination. The checklists will list each procedure to be followed, as well as a list of mandatory documents that must be included in each file. Management will review each file prior to finalization until a noted consistency in reexamination has been reached, then periodical reviews will be implemented. Anticipated Date of Completion The corrective actions outlined have either been fully implemented or will be implemented by October 31, 2026.
Finding: 2025-001 and 2025-002 Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Housing Choice Vouchers Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition Identified: During the audit review of 40 participant files tested for compliance with eligibility, annual reevaluations, ten...
Finding: 2025-001 and 2025-002 Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Housing Choice Vouchers Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition Identified: During the audit review of 40 participant files tested for compliance with eligibility, annual reevaluations, tenant rent, utility allowances, and housing assistance payment requirements, the audit identified the following errors: o 15 files were not completed in a timely manner. o 1 file miscalculated the total tenant payment due to incorrect deductions applied. o 9 instances of misaligned utility responsibility across HAP Contract and Lease Agreement. Corrective Action Plan The Ferndale Housing Commission is committed to correcting all findings and ensuring accuracy in file completion, correct participant deductions, as well as correct utility responsibilities in the future. It is worth noting that the FHC was not made aware of the Zip-Code payment standards until 2026, although during a shortfall meeting held on August 25, 2025, the utility payment standards were mentioned and confirmed that they were pulled from the HUD SAFMR website, nothing regarding zip code payment standards were mentioned. Planned Corrective Actions The following actions have been implemented to ensure accuracy in reporting: All annual and interim rent certifications will be reviewed by management for accuracy prior to being accepted and submitted. o The zip code payment standards will be implemented after the HUD required mandatory one-year waiting period. The transition was explained in a letter sent to all HCV participants. o The Ferndale Housing Commission has repositioned staff to bring delinquent annual/interim reexaminations current. The restructuring was based on the strengths of the staff and has resulted in greatly reduced instances of delayed reexaminations. o All files will be reviewed for accuracy by management before submission to PIC to ensure correct uniformity and correct calculation of income, deductions, allowances, assets, payment standards, and utility responsibilities. Staff Training and Management Overview o The FHC has established mandatory weekly meetings to discuss file accuracy and ensure all staff follow the same rules, regulations, payment standards, deductions, allowances. o During the mandatory meetings, the HUD 50058 forms will be used as teaching tools and completed by hand by each staff member to ensure full understanding of the 50058 and accuracy in reporting responsibilities. o There have been monthly delayed annual recertification reports pulled and discussed with staff, with deadlines provided to bring all reports current. Strengthened Internal Controls The FHC has established checklists to be included in each file during reexamination. The checklists will list each procedure to be followed, as well as a list of mandatory documents that must be included in each file. Management will review each file prior to finalization until a noted consistency in reexamination has been reached, then periodical reviews will be implemented. Anticipated Date of Completion The corrective actions outlined have either been fully implemented or will be implemented by October 31, 2026.
Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Glenn Seagraves, CFO Corrective Action Plan: The delay in filing was the result of significant staff turnover in Liberty Resources Inc.’s finance department producing the Organization's financial statements and the limited availability of...
Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Glenn Seagraves, CFO Corrective Action Plan: The delay in filing was the result of significant staff turnover in Liberty Resources Inc.’s finance department producing the Organization's financial statements and the limited availability of other resources to assist in the preparation of the financial statements. The Organization has developed and implemented a staffing plan that has adjusted the responsibilities of existing staff and has also hired new additional staff since the end of the June 30, 2024 fiscal year. Anticipated completion date: The plan has been implemented and will continue to be monitored to ensure the Organization’s ability to complete the Single Audit financial statements in a timely manner and that the data collection form can be submitted in compliance with the Single Audit requirements.
Internal Control over Compliance- Subrecipient Monitoring Recommendation: We recommend all expenses incurred by subrecipients are reviewed and approved prior to reimbursement. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Response by management to t...
Internal Control over Compliance- Subrecipient Monitoring Recommendation: We recommend all expenses incurred by subrecipients are reviewed and approved prior to reimbursement. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Response by management to the finding: We acknowledge that prior to the completion of our January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 audit CASA relied on summary level expense reports from subrecipients under the PCCD grant and did not consistently verify underlying invoices. More detail regarding process in place at the time of FY2024 audit can be found in the corrective action plan for that year. Due to the timing of the FY2024 audits completion having been finalized in December 2025 procedural changes to address the concerns were not consistently implemented until the end of FY2025. As a result, the actions put in place in the prior year corrective action plan were not reflected in our FY2025 procedure. Actions taken prior to and since the issuance of the FY2024 audit include engagement of a new contracted accounting firm with a wider breadth of experience and expertise; an internal restructuring of staff to provide increased opportunity for oversight and review of contracted financial services, a new review protocol of invoices requiring verification of supporting documentation, and documentation of management approval of invoices. Also of note, the PCCD grant in question required a lengthy budget modification process, which required additional oversight and review of allowable costs. The term of this funding ends 9/30/2026 and will not be extended or renewed. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Leigh Anne McKelvey, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 9/30/26 If the U.S. Department of the Treasury has questions regarding this plan, please call Leigh Anne McKelvey, Executive Director, at 610-565-2208.
Management concurs with this finding, in part. As discussed in Finding 2025-001, during the period under audit, CARS had historically classified the affected entities as contractors/vendors based on management’s review and understanding of the nature of those relationships. As a result of those clas...
Management concurs with this finding, in part. As discussed in Finding 2025-001, during the period under audit, CARS had historically classified the affected entities as contractors/vendors based on management’s review and understanding of the nature of those relationships. As a result of those classifications, CARS did not apply all of the formal subrecipient monitoring requirements of 2 CFR § 200.332 to these entities. Specifically, formal subrecipient risk assessments were not performed or documented, verification of required audits under Subpart F was not incorporated into a formal monitoring process, and certain subrecipient agreements contained incorrect Assistance Listing Numbers (ALNs). CARS believes it is important to distinguish the identified deficiencies from an absence of risk evaluation, oversight or monitoring of the entities. Although CARS did not perform or document formal subrecipient risk assessments in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.332, management considered factors relevant to organizational risk during the initial proposal and partner-selection process. These considerations included CARS’ prior experience with the organizations, their demonstrated performance and funding histories, organizational capabilities, and experience administering federally funded programs, as applicable. The basis for partner selection and related considerations were reflected in the proposal documentation. During the period under audit, CARS reviewed and approved reimbursement requests for allowability and performed ongoing programmatic monitoring of performance and progress. However, because the entities were classified as contractors/vendors, these risk evaluation and monitoring activities were performed within CARS’ existing proposal, vendor, and program oversight processes rather than within a formal subrecipient monitoring framework designed to address all requirements of 2 CFR § 200.332. Based on additional training regarding subaward management under 2 CFR Part 200 and the matters identified during the current audit, management recognizes that formal written policies, documented classification determinations, and additional monitoring controls are necessary to ensure that entities determined to be subrecipients are consistently monitored in accordance with applicable Uniform Guidance requirements. CARS began corrective action and, prior to issuance of the audit report, completed the following: 1. Confirmed the correct Assistance Listing Number for the NTTAC federal award and identified subrecipient agreements requiring correction; 2. Issued modifications to affected subrecipient agreements, as necessary, to communicate the correct ALN for the applicable Year 5 modifications; 3. Reviewed available subrecipient SEFA information related to FY2025 expenditures to evaluate the accuracy of the reported ALN and communicated necessary corrections, as applicable; and 4. Obtained and reviewed available Single Audit information for the affected subrecipients and confirmed that no findings related to federal funding received from CARS were identified in the reports reviewed. Corrective Action CARS will formalize and document its existing procedures as they specifically relate to subrecipients and the applicable requirements of 2 CFR § 200.331 and § 200.332. The policy and related procedures will include documented subrecipient-versus-contractor determinations; subrecipient risk assessments; verification of required subaward information, including the Assistance Listing Number (ALN); review of financial and programmatic performance information; verification of applicable Subpart F audit requirements; review and follow-up of audit findings or other significant developments; and documentation and retention of monitoring activities, conclusions, and corrective actions, as applicable. CARS will also establish a documented pre-execution review and approval control for applicable federally funded agreements to verify the appropriate classification of the relationship and the accuracy and completeness of required federal award information before execution. As part of implementation, CARS will review applicable existing federally funded agreements under the new policy. If an existing relationship is determined to meet the criteria of a subrecipient rather than a contractor, CARS will appropriately classify the agreement, correct applicable federal award information, including the ALN, as necessary, and apply and document the required subrecipient monitoring procedures prospectively. Responsible Party: Ranelle Bensch, Director of Finance & Compliance Target Implementation Date: March 2027
Management Response Management concurs with this finding, in part. CARS acknowledges that its SEFA preparation process did not include a formally documented procedure for evaluating and documenting subrecipient-versus-contractor determinations or a documented supervisory review control over the prep...
Management Response Management concurs with this finding, in part. CARS acknowledges that its SEFA preparation process did not include a formally documented procedure for evaluating and documenting subrecipient-versus-contractor determinations or a documented supervisory review control over the preparation of the SEFA. However, during the period under audit, management did review agreements at the time of award and considered the nature of each relationship in determining the appropriate classification based on its understanding of the subrecipient criteria established under Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR § 200.331. Accordingly, while CARS acknowledges that its evaluation and review processes were not formally documented, management believes it is important to distinguish the absence of formal documentation and controls from an absence of management review or consideration of the appropriate classification. CARS’ classification approach had also been discussed with the auditors during the annual Single Audits conducted for Years 1 through 4 of the current federal award. No exceptions related to the classification of these entities were identified during those prior audits. CARS recognizes, however, that responsibility for determining the appropriate classification of subrecipients and contractors and for ensuring accurate SEFA reporting rests with management. Based on additional training regarding subaward management under 2 CFR Part 200, together with the matters identified and discussed during the current audit, CARS agrees that establishing a formal written policy and documented review process will strengthen its internal controls and help ensure consistent application of the Uniform Guidance requirements. Upon identification of the classification issue during the current audit, CARS evaluated the affected entities and revised the SEFA prior to issuance of the audit report to properly reflect amounts provided to subrecipients. The revision did not change total federal expenditures reported on the SEFA. Corrective Action CARS will develop and implement written procedures for subrecipient-versus-contractor determinations and will establish formal SEFA preparation and review procedures, including documented supervisory review prior to issuance. Responsible Party: Ranelle Bensch, Director of Finance & Compliance Target Implementation Date: January 2027
Finding 2025 – 004 Internal Controls over Financial Reporting Name of Contact Person: David Rosado, Executive Director Corrective Action: The Council agrees with this finding. The Council has hired a new Finance Director effective January 2, 2025, with the appropriate skills, knowledge, and experien...
Finding 2025 – 004 Internal Controls over Financial Reporting Name of Contact Person: David Rosado, Executive Director Corrective Action: The Council agrees with this finding. The Council has hired a new Finance Director effective January 2, 2025, with the appropriate skills, knowledge, and experience to oversee the Finance Department. The Finance Director has identified and corrected internal control issues. All coding and processing of Aging Expenditures has been updated, and documents complied with State and Federal policies are in place. Completion Date: December 8, 2025
Finding Reference This corrective action plan relates to audit finding 2025 001 as reported in the schedule of findings and questioned costs. Contact Persons Dwayne Shaw, Executive Director, and Michelle Wright, Office Manager , are responsible for implementing and monitoring the corrective actions,...
Finding Reference This corrective action plan relates to audit finding 2025 001 as reported in the schedule of findings and questioned costs. Contact Persons Dwayne Shaw, Executive Director, and Michelle Wright, Office Manager , are responsible for implementing and monitoring the corrective actions, maintaining related policies and procedures, and reporting status to those charged with governance. (207) 483-4336 Management’s Response / Concurrence Management agrees with the finding. The organization acknowledges that it does not currently have written policies and procedures addressing certain required Uniform Guidance compliance areas. Planned Corrective Action Management will develop, approve, and implement written policies and procedures designed to comply with applicable Uniform Guidance requirements, including policies over allowable costs/cost principles, cash management, and procurement, including suspension and debarment. Management will also communicate the new policies to relevant personnel and provide training as needed to support consistent implementation. Anticipated Completion Dates Management will finalize and implement the corrective action plan on or before September 30, 2026.
The City of Grandview acknowledges the audit finding regarding inadequate internal controls over compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. The City takes its responsibility for compliance with federal grant requirements seriously and has implemented corrective measures to addres...
The City of Grandview acknowledges the audit finding regarding inadequate internal controls over compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. The City takes its responsibility for compliance with federal grant requirements seriously and has implemented corrective measures to address the finding and prevent recurrence. The condition resulted from a decentralized process in which individual departments responsible for federally funded projects were also responsible for verifying that contractors and vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal programs. While staff understood the general requirement, the City did not have a sufficiently standardized and centralized process to ensure that the required verification was consistently performed and documented. In response to the finding, the City has strengthened its internal controls and established a standardized suspension and debarment verification process. The City has implemented the following corrective actions: 1. Standardized Verification Procedure: Prior to entering into a covered transaction involving federal funds, Department Heads must verify the eligibility of the contractor, vendor, consultant, or other applicable party through the federal System for Award Management (SAM.gov) or another federally authorized method. 2. Documentation Requirement: Evidence of the verification, including the entity name, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), date of verification, and documentation of the search results, must be retained in the applicable procurement, contract, grant, or project file. 3. Centralized Oversight: Departments administering federal awards remain responsible for initiating the verification, while Administration and Finance will monitor compliance and documentation. 4. Pre-Payment/Contract Controls: For applicable federally funded contracts and purchases, required suspension and debarment documentation must be completed and retained before execution of the contract or expenditure of federal funds. 5. Staff Training: Employees responsible for procurement, contracting, grant administration, and accounts payable will receive guidance regarding federal suspension and debarment requirements and the City’s documentation procedures. 6. Ongoing Monitoring: Administrative staff will periodically review federally funded transactions to ensure the required verification has been performed and supporting documentation is maintained. The City believes these corrective actions establish appropriate internal controls to ensure compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements and provide sufficient documentation for future audits. The City appreciates the State Auditor’s Office identifying this opportunity to strengthen its federal grant compliance procedures and is committed to maintaining effective internal controls and full compliance with applicable federal requirements.
FINDING No. 2025-002: Section 207/223(f) Mortgage Insurance for the Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects, ALN 14.155 Recommendation: Management should take corrective measures to prevent further escrow disbursements for exempt taxes and should obtain timely refunds for amounts that w...
FINDING No. 2025-002: Section 207/223(f) Mortgage Insurance for the Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects, ALN 14.155 Recommendation: Management should take corrective measures to prevent further escrow disbursements for exempt taxes and should obtain timely refunds for amounts that were incorrectly disbursed. Action Taken: Management has properly filed the real estate exemption forms with the District of Columbia in prior years. When real estate funds were improperly withdrawn by the mortgage company and/or its tax vendor, management promptly identified the issue and recorded a journal entry (debit accounts receivable, credit escrow deposit) to recognize the receivable. Beginning in 2024 and continuing through 2025, management made multiple attempts to follow up with the mortgage company representatives to request the refund. Management has taken proactive and persistent steps to pursue resolution. As of early 2026, the refund has been successfully received. Management also expects that the mortgage company will no longer withdraw real estate tax payments for the property going forward. Based on the above, management believes appropriate controls were in place and effectively operated, as evidenced by the timely identification of the issue and the actions taken to remediate it. If the Oversight Agency for Audit has questions regarding the plan, please call Irene Phillips at 954-835-9200. Sincerely yours, Irene Phillips, CFO Irene Phillips CFO
Oversight Agency for Audit, Senior Citizens Housing Development Corporation of Washington respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2025. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Bellows Associates, P.A., 5401 N University Drive, Suite 2...
Oversight Agency for Audit, Senior Citizens Housing Development Corporation of Washington respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2025. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Bellows Associates, P.A., 5401 N University Drive, Suite 201, Coral Springs, Florida 33067. Audit period: January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025 The findings from the December 31, 2025 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers in the schedule. SECTION III - FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS – MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDIT FINDING No. 2025-001: Section 207/223(f) Mortgage Insurance for the Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects, ALN 14.155 Recommendation: Management should submit a form HUD-9250 to withdraw the excess deposits and implement procedures to ensure the correct amounts are deposited into the replacement reserve account each month. Action Taken: The Project will submit a form HUD-9250 to withdraw the excess replacement reserve deposits as recommended. In addition, management will strengthen its review procedures to ensure that replacement reserve deposits are made in the correct HUD-approved amounts and that all reserve account adjustments are addressed on a timely basis.
Federal Program Information Federal Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Pass-Through Entity: University of Pittsburgh; Not Applicable; Not Applicable Pass-Through Entity Number: AWD00009525; Not Applicable; Not Applicable Awards: Assistance Listing 93.145 – HIV Related Training...
Federal Program Information Federal Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Pass-Through Entity: University of Pittsburgh; Not Applicable; Not Applicable Pass-Through Entity Number: AWD00009525; Not Applicable; Not Applicable Awards: Assistance Listing 93.145 – HIV Related Training and Technical Assistance; Assistance Listing 93.153 - Coordinated Services and Access to Research for Women, Infants, Children and Youth; Assistance Listing 93.939 – HIV Prevention Activities Non-Governmental Organization Based Award Periods: July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025; July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026; August 1, 2024 to July 31, 2025; August 1, 2025 to July 31, 2026; April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025; July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025; April 1, 2025 to March 31, 2026; July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Description: Internal control deficiency over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Recommendation: Management should enhance its suspension and debarment control to ensure all vendors associated with federally funded programs are included in the screening population. Management should maintain evidence of its review of the completeness and accuracy of the vendor population provided to the third-party service provider and the results of the screening process. View of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding and has implemented procedures to ensure completeness and accuracy of the approved vendor list for monthly suspension and debarment screening. Name(s) of the Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: Lindsay Mccrory Eric Lyda Corrective Action Planned: Inova will enhance controls over the completeness, accuracy, and documentation of the vendor population subject to monthly suspension and debarment screening. Corrective actions include implementing procedures to validate the completeness of the vendor population, reconciling the population submitted for screening to source records, standardizing report generation to reduce reliance on manual processes, and strengthening documentation of control execution to ensure continued compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Inova will also formalize control responsibilities and provide training to support consistent execution of the screening process. Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Planned: September 30, 2026 2026
Finding Number: 2025-001 Planned Corrective Action: The Housing Authority has contracted with the Nelrod Company a national technical consulting firm specializing in Federal Assisted Housing Programs to perform our rent reasonableness determinations. All files moving forward will have a rent reasona...
Finding Number: 2025-001 Planned Corrective Action: The Housing Authority has contracted with the Nelrod Company a national technical consulting firm specializing in Federal Assisted Housing Programs to perform our rent reasonableness determinations. All files moving forward will have a rent reasonableness determination. Anticipated Completion Date: 9/3/2026 Responsible Contact Person: Zackary Dye, Executive Director
The Accounting Department will develop a checklist to review employee files to ensure all necessary documentation is filed appropriately and updated timely. An internal audit will be scheduled annually to ensure employee files are complete.
The Accounting Department will develop a checklist to review employee files to ensure all necessary documentation is filed appropriately and updated timely. An internal audit will be scheduled annually to ensure employee files are complete.
The Cooperative will make deposits to the general operating reserve to meet the HUD regulatory agreement. In September 2025, the Cooperative entered into a management agreement with Paramark Real Estate Services to manage the Cooperative. The management agent will implemement a process to ensure dep...
The Cooperative will make deposits to the general operating reserve to meet the HUD regulatory agreement. In September 2025, the Cooperative entered into a management agreement with Paramark Real Estate Services to manage the Cooperative. The management agent will implemement a process to ensure deposits are made as required by the regulatory agreement.
The Cooperative will obtain appropriate approvals for withdrawls exceeding 20% of the general operating reserve to meet the HUD regulatory agreement. In September 2025, the Cooperative entered into a management agreement with Paramark Real Estate Services to manage the Cooperative. The management ag...
The Cooperative will obtain appropriate approvals for withdrawls exceeding 20% of the general operating reserve to meet the HUD regulatory agreement. In September 2025, the Cooperative entered into a management agreement with Paramark Real Estate Services to manage the Cooperative. The management agent will implement a process to ensure approvals are obtained as required by the regulatory agreement.
In September 2025, the Cooperative entered into a management agreement with Paramark Real Estate Services to manage the Cooperative. The management company maintains sufficient controls and procedures related to financial reporting and have proper segregation of duties in place to safeguard the asse...
In September 2025, the Cooperative entered into a management agreement with Paramark Real Estate Services to manage the Cooperative. The management company maintains sufficient controls and procedures related to financial reporting and have proper segregation of duties in place to safeguard the assets of the Cooperative.
« 1 9 10 12 13 2328 »