Audit 387560

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$74.31M
Findings
10
Programs
3
Organization: Food for the Hungry (AZ)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-02-17

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1173955 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1173956 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1173957 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1173958 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1173959 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1173960 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1173961 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1173962 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1173963 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1173964 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
98.008 FOOD FOR PEACE EMERGENCY PROGRAM (EP) $7.51M Yes 1
98.007 FOOD FOR PEACE DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (DAP) $5.62M Yes 1
98.001 USAID FOREIGN ASSISTANCE FOR PROGRAMS OVERSEAS $27,354 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
G4QTPHW3TPH6 Nadia Sofia Rodriguez Auditee
4243326783 Marla Hummel Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the "Schedule") represents the expenditures of all federal awards of Food for the Hungry (“FH”) for the year ended September 30, 2025 and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 - Uniform Administration Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Therefore, some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic consolidated financial statements. Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Non-cash assistance is reported by the value assigned by the grantor. If FH is required to match certain federal assistance, as defined by the grant agreements, no such matching has been included as expenditures in the schedule.
FH has elected not to use the 15-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

SECTION III - FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Finding #: 2025-001 Food for Peace Cluster (Assistance Listing Numbers 98.007 and 98.008) Award year ended September 30, 2025 Federal Agency: U.S. Agency for International Development Type of Finding: Allowable Costs Internal Control over Compliance (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: In accordance with 23 CFR sections 1.9, 172.11(a), 420.113(a), and 630.106(a), costs incurred under federal awards are considered allowable and reimbursable when such costs are deemed necessary and reasonable; incurred subsequent to the date of authorization to proceed and in accordance with the conditions contained in the project agreement and the plans specifications; and, not included as costs used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements, among other things. A complete system of internal controls requires all expenditures be properly approved and supported by appropriate documentation. Condition/Context: The following internal control issues were noted during testing: From a non-statistical sample of forty (40) payroll expenditures subject to testing, we identified four (4) instances where the transaction had two different versions of support (timesheets), one of which did not agree to the time charged to the grant award. Cause/Effect: Based on discussions with personnel, it was noted that the original timesheet submitted by the employee was subsequently revised during the review/approval process. While FH was able to provide the updated timesheet and tie out the amount charged to the grant award, we observed that both versions of the timesheet remain on file with no markings distinguishing the original from the final version. As it is not clear which timesheet is the original and which is the updated version the current process could result in the incorrect amount being charged to the grant awards. Questioned Costs: None noted. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: FH should remove the superseded version from the file or clearly mark it as void so that supporting documentation on file properly supports the amount charged to the grant award. Views of Responsible Official: Management identified the issue at the time and implemented corrective actions during FY2025, with no impact on costs. The revised process became effective in October 2025.