Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
55,681
In database
Filtered Results
18,710
Matching current filters
Showing Page
44 of 749
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Reporting
Magnolia Manor Corporation has taken steps to ensure that the Replacement Reserve account will not be underfunded by withdrawing funds to cover the Operating Account. The underfunded amount of $2,688.00 has been deposited on August 20, 2025, and $306.00 has been deposited on September 15, 2025. Magn...
Magnolia Manor Corporation has taken steps to ensure that the Replacement Reserve account will not be underfunded by withdrawing funds to cover the Operating Account. The underfunded amount of $2,688.00 has been deposited on August 20, 2025, and $306.00 has been deposited on September 15, 2025. Magnolia Manor Corporation has reviewed the auditors' recommendation and will ensure that more thorough monthly reviews will be implemented.
Effective immediately, ULGC will seek to engage an external financial consultant to provide formal training under the direction of Reginald F. Smith II, President and CEO. Training will be targeted to the accounting team, including the Director of Accounting, and will focus on GAAP compliance, timel...
Effective immediately, ULGC will seek to engage an external financial consultant to provide formal training under the direction of Reginald F. Smith II, President and CEO. Training will be targeted to the accounting team, including the Director of Accounting, and will focus on GAAP compliance, timely month-end closing procedures, grant revenue recognition, indirect cost allocation, accurate cash application to accounts receivable, and SEFA preparation.
Corrective Action Plan Matchbook Learning Schools of Indiana, Inc. Finding 2025-001 – Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Federal Program: Title I, Part A (84.010) Repeat Finding: Yes (Prior Audit Finding 2024-004) Corrective Action Plan Matchbook Learning Schools of Indiana, Inc. acknowledges the Maintenan...
Corrective Action Plan Matchbook Learning Schools of Indiana, Inc. Finding 2025-001 – Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Federal Program: Title I, Part A (84.010) Repeat Finding: Yes (Prior Audit Finding 2024-004) Corrective Action Plan Matchbook Learning Schools of Indiana, Inc. acknowledges the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) finding related to the accuracy of expenditures reported on the Form 9 cash-basis report submitted to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). This finding is a repeat finding from the prior audit period. The School recognizes that prior corrective actions were not sufficient to fully address the reliability of Form 9 reporting. As a result, the School has enhanced and formalized internal controls surrounding Form 9 preparation, review, and submission to ensure compliance with IDOE guidelines and to prevent recurrence of this issue. Corrective Actions Implemented 1. Formal Form 9 Reconciliation Process ○ The School has implemented a documented reconciliation process to compare internal cash-basis financial records to the Form 9 prior to submission. ○ This reconciliation ensures that only allowable cash expenditures are reported and that reported totals align with bank activity and supporting documentation. 2. Strengthened Review and Approval Controls ○ Preparation of the Form 9 is now subject to a multi-level review process. ○ The Form 9 will be reviewed by the School’s financial consultant and School leadership to confirm accuracy, compliance with IDOE reporting guidance, and consistency with underlying financial records prior to submission. 3. Written Procedures and Staff Training ○ Written internal procedures have been developed outlining Form 9 preparation requirements, including proper treatment of accruals, timing differences, and non-cash items. ○ Staff involved in financial reporting have received refresher training on IDOE Form 9 reporting requirements and maintenance of effort considerations. 4. Ongoing Monitoring and Communication ○ The School will perform periodic internal monitoring of cash-basis expenditures throughout the fiscal year to identify potential discrepancies prior to year-end reporting. ○ When necessary, the School will proactively communicate with IDOE to clarify reporting requirements before submission. Responsible Officials ● Board of Directors ● School Leadership ● Director of Finance Planned Completion Date ● Immediate and Ongoing These procedures have been implemented and will be applied to the current and all future reporting periods. Expected Results The implementation of these enhanced internal controls will ensure that Form 9 expense reporting is accurate, complete, and prepared in accordance with IDOE guidelines. This will support reliable Maintenance of Effort calculations by IDOE and is expected to prevent recurrence of this finding in future audit periods. Don Stewart COO Matchbook Learning
The board of trustees regularly reviews financial statements, bank reconciliations, and budget vs. actual information to help to mitigate the lack of ideal segregation of duties.
The board of trustees regularly reviews financial statements, bank reconciliations, and budget vs. actual information to help to mitigate the lack of ideal segregation of duties.
AUDIT FINDING Finding 2025-001 NSLDS Status Reporting Error MANAGEMENT'S COMMENTS ON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT'S We concur with the auditor’s finding and identification of a deficiency in our internal controls. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN We will enact stronger controls to ensure that all f...
AUDIT FINDING Finding 2025-001 NSLDS Status Reporting Error MANAGEMENT'S COMMENTS ON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT'S We concur with the auditor’s finding and identification of a deficiency in our internal controls. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN We will enact stronger controls to ensure that all future enrollment reporting is submitted timely. EMPLOYEE/ DIVISION RESPONSIBLE Financial Aid Director TIMELINE AND ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE Immediately
SEE SEFA REPORT FOR CAP ON FINDING 2025-002
SEE SEFA REPORT FOR CAP ON FINDING 2025-002
SEE SEFA REPORT FOR CAP ON FINDING 2025-001
SEE SEFA REPORT FOR CAP ON FINDING 2025-001
Management implemented corrective actions to strengthen internal controls over the Data Collection Form submission process, including assigning responsibility to a designated individual and monitoring submission deadlines to ensure timely filing in future periods. Name of contact person responsible ...
Management implemented corrective actions to strengthen internal controls over the Data Collection Form submission process, including assigning responsibility to a designated individual and monitoring submission deadlines to ensure timely filing in future periods. Name of contact person responsible for corrective action plan: Renee Moynagh, Chief Financial Officer. Current Status: The finding has been corrected effective December, 2025.
Management acknowledges the missing internal control over the late submission of the updated financial model/plan for the fiscal year end June 30, 2024. Management has maintained an effective internal control tool for many years in the form of a master spreadsheet called the Annual Task Calendar tha...
Management acknowledges the missing internal control over the late submission of the updated financial model/plan for the fiscal year end June 30, 2024. Management has maintained an effective internal control tool for many years in the form of a master spreadsheet called the Annual Task Calendar that the entire Finance staff reviews at every biweekly Finance meeting, but the WIFIA deadlines were errantly not incorporated into that tool until January 2026. While management agrees with the finding, it should be noted that management was not operating without controls. Rather, the deadline being adhered to was just the wrong date. Management submitted updated financial model/plan by January 31, 2025, which was within the month following the close of the calendar year, similarly to the quarterly construction reports that are due 30 days after the end of the preceding quarter. In addition, the data on the annual model reflected current information near the time of release of the report, not June 30, 2024. So, in substance, management provided an even more current, relevant document. Management acknowledges the additional finding language that the June 30, 2025 quarterly construction monitoring report was submitted on day 31 rather than day 30 following the close of the quarter. Finally, management acknowledges that the annual updated financial model/plan for June 30, 2025, will be submitted in January 2026 as the internal control, as mentioned above, was not corrected until January 2026, which will result in the same finding on the Single Audit for June 30, 2026. However, management believes that we have taken the appropriate measures required to avoid ongoing replication. Responsible Official: Matt Zook, Finance Director
The Organization has set up a system to review transfers of federal funding by the Senior Asset Manager and Chief Financial Officer prior to the transfer taking place to ensure it is within the compliance requirements of the grant
The Organization has set up a system to review transfers of federal funding by the Senior Asset Manager and Chief Financial Officer prior to the transfer taking place to ensure it is within the compliance requirements of the grant
The security deposit discrepancy will be rectified
The security deposit discrepancy will be rectified
The Salvation Army submitted a BBRI which requested increased rents and releases from reserves to pay accounts payable as well as approval of loans from the Sponsor to cover accounts payable that could not be paid from reserves. This would enable the reserves to be paid on a go forward basis. In add...
The Salvation Army submitted a BBRI which requested increased rents and releases from reserves to pay accounts payable as well as approval of loans from the Sponsor to cover accounts payable that could not be paid from reserves. This would enable the reserves to be paid on a go forward basis. In addition, the next step will be a BBRI for the RAD for PRAC conversion.
The Salvation Army submitted a BBRI which requested increased rents and releases from reserves to pay accounts payable as well as approval of loans from the Sponsor to cover accounts payable that could not be paid from reserves. This would enable the reserves to be paid on a go forward basis. In add...
The Salvation Army submitted a BBRI which requested increased rents and releases from reserves to pay accounts payable as well as approval of loans from the Sponsor to cover accounts payable that could not be paid from reserves. This would enable the reserves to be paid on a go forward basis. In addition, the next step will be a BBRI for the RAD for PRAC conversion.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.994 Significant Deficiency, Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Reporting Finding 2025-010 – Repeat Finding Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.994 Significant Deficiency, Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Reporting Finding 2025-010 – Repeat Finding Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.334 the recipient must retain all federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. Condition: During the audit we tested 9 reports and noted the following: a) There was one (1) instance out of (9) nine reports tested where the submitted reports were unable to be provided, including the date of submission for the reports. b) There were four (4) instances out of nine (9) reports tested where the County was unable to provide evidence the report was reviewed prior to submission. c) There were two (2) instances out of nine (9) reports tested where the County was unable to provide the date of submission for the reports. Questioned Costs: None of the nonmaterial noncompliance items resulted in questioned costs. Effect: By not having the required documentation and underlying support, the County is not able to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements. Cause: The County did not have a formal policy to ensure documentation was retained to evidence review and submission of all reports. Recommendation: While the County made updates to policies and procedures surrounding reporting during the current year to address the prior year finding, the County should ensure these policies are adhered to ensure all submitted reports and underlying data are retained in accordance with the Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: As of July 2025, The Health Department has created and adopted policy FIS-05 Retention of Reporting Requirement Submissions to ensure that federal award reports and data are retained in accordance with Uniform Guidance. The Health Department will document with screen shots as outlined in the FIS-05 Policy, to address circumstances when the required report consists of answering a NCDHHS survey or form that does not have “save” or “download” capability, to maintain record of documented submissions. In addition, the Health Department has developed a standard operating procedure whereby fiscal compliance Management Analysts, in collaboration with Program Managers, ensure they have reviewed federal award reports prior to submission and file documentation of review and approvals. While review of grant reports is common, the Health Department did not have adequate documentation to demonstrate completion of this step prior to July 2025. An additional training, to be recorded, will be held with program staff Friday December 19th, 2025. Anticipated Completion Date: December 19,, 2025 Responsible Person(s): Autumn Watson, Business Operations Director
Finding – Reporting: Financial Reporting - Student Financial Assistance Cluster, Assistance Listing #84.063 and #84.268, June 30, 2025 Award Year, U.S. Department of Education Criteria or Specific Requirement Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records to t...
Finding – Reporting: Financial Reporting - Student Financial Assistance Cluster, Assistance Listing #84.063 and #84.268, June 30, 2025 Award Year, U.S. Department of Education Criteria or Specific Requirement Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records to the COD ("Common Origination and Disbursement") system. The disbursement record reports the actual disbursement date and the amount of the disbursement. Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution makes the disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. (July 2024 OMB Compliance Supplement pages 5-3-26 and 5-3-27) The date of disbursement determines when a student becomes a federal student aid (FSA) recipient and has the rights and responsibilities of an FSA recipient. A disbursement occurs when the School credits a student’s account or pays a student or parent directly with: • FSA funds received from the Department; or • School funds labeled as FSA funds in advance of receiving actual FSA funds. (Student Financial Aid Handbook, Volume 4, Chapter 2) Condition Found One of the 15 students selected for disbursement reporting had errors in the information that was reported to COD as follows: • The disbursement date reported was different from the actual disbursement date by one day • The cost of attendance that was reported to COD was different by $20 • The incorrect parent was identified as the borrower in the initial submission to COD Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Staff have been trained on the proper procedures, and a formal policy and procedure has been established and is now referenced by the financial aid team. These procedures cover the correct process for releasing and disbursing federal aid within the Jenzabar JFA system to ensure compliance with federal regulations, including accurate disbursement date reporting in COD. Names of Contact Person Responsible for Correction Action: Renee Jordan, Director of Financial Aid Anticipated Completion Date: October 14, 2025
Finding 2025-002 – Internal Control over Compliance – Reporting (Significant Deficiency) CFDA Title and Number 84.354A Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance/Internal Control over Compliance: Auditee Responsibilities - 87 - Criteria: Unifo...
Finding 2025-002 – Internal Control over Compliance – Reporting (Significant Deficiency) CFDA Title and Number 84.354A Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance/Internal Control over Compliance: Auditee Responsibilities - 87 - Criteria: Uniform Guidance CFR Part 200.303 requires entities to maintain effective internal control over compliance for federal programs, including accurate financial reporting. GAAP requires proper recognition and disclosure of long-term obligations such as Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB). In-ternal controls should ensure debt balances are reconciled to lender statements and amortization schedules to prevent misstatement in reports and the SEFA. Condition: Myrtle Point School District No. did not perform routine reconciliations of QZAB debt bal-ances during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. The general ledger balance for QZAB differed from the amortization schedule and accrued interest was not updated. No documented review or reconciliation was performed. Failed to report the interest for the QZAB bonds and failed to post the principal pay-ments that were paid from the QZAB for the Flex fund. Entries were required to correct this deficiency in order to complete the audit. Cause: Lack of formal reconciliation procedures and oversight; reliance on outdated schedules without updates. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to accurately reconcile QZAB balances or amortization records, can result in a risk of material misstatement of liabilities and interest expense for the financial statements; po-tential errors in SEFA reporting when QZAB financed federally funded assets. This could lead to non-compliance with reporting requirements and misclassification of debt-financed assets. Questioned Cost: None reported Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that Myrtle Point School District No. 41 implement a monthly recon-ciliation process for QZAB debt, agreeing general ledger balances to lender statements and amortization schedules, and require documented review and sign-off by the Director of Business Services. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will implement reconciliations and update the schedules, and inte-grate review into the year-end close process. Planned Implementation Date: January 31, 2026 Responsible Person: Director of Business Services, Myrtle Point School District No. 41
Finding 2025-001, Reporting- Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance Cause: The finding resulted from the lack of a formalized, documented review process to verify the accuracy of claim data between Skyward, PrimeroEdge, and TXUNPS. Historically, the claim reporting relied on sin...
Finding 2025-001, Reporting- Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance Cause: The finding resulted from the lack of a formalized, documented review process to verify the accuracy of claim data between Skyward, PrimeroEdge, and TXUNPS. Historically, the claim reporting relied on single-entry verification without a defined cross-check procedure or document retention system to confirm alignment across platforms. Corrective Action: NYOS Charter School has implemented a new monthly verification process to ensure accuracy and transparency in the meal count reporting workflow. - The PEIMS Manager will generate the Average Daily Attendance (ADA) report from Skyward each month. - The Food Service Manager will use this report to enter claim data into PrimeroEdge. - The Director of Operations will then cross-reference the claim information from PrimeroEdge with the ADA report from Skyward before entering final claim data into TXUNPS. - Copies of the ADA report, the PrimeroEdge claim summary, and the TXUNPS submission confirmation will be downloaded and stored in the Food Services Google Drive for audit documentation and ongoing internal control review. - Staff involved in this process will receive annual training on verification procedures, documentation standards, and data integrity best practices. Timeline: Updated verification process implemented in October 2025; full rollout and training completed by December 2025. Responsible Party: - Chief of Operations & HR -Director of Operations - PEIMS Manager - Food Service Manager Monitoring: Quarterly internal reviews will be conducted by the Chief of Operations & HR to ensure consistent application of the cross-verification process and proper retention of supporting documentation in the Food Services Google Drive.
FISAP Reporting Planned Corrective Action: Deficiency: The backup documentation submitted for the Fiscal Operations Report and Application to Participate (FISAP) did not match the data reported on the FISAP. Institution Response: We acknowledge this discrepancy and agree that the FISAP backup docume...
FISAP Reporting Planned Corrective Action: Deficiency: The backup documentation submitted for the Fiscal Operations Report and Application to Participate (FISAP) did not match the data reported on the FISAP. Institution Response: We acknowledge this discrepancy and agree that the FISAP backup documentation did not fully align with Part II, Sections 7a (Total Undergraduate Students) and 7b (Total Graduate Students) as reported on the submitted FISAP. The current FISAP reflects 43 for Section 7a, whereas the correct figure is 60, and 199 for Section 7b, whereas the correct figure is 202. Root Cause: At the time the report was prepared, the institution was relying on a contracted financial aid professional to provide the data for FISAP reporting. Although this work was performed in good faith, the contracted individual provided incorrect figures, which resulted in minor data discrepancies between the FISAP and the supporting documentation. Corrective Action Taken: Our Institution has ended its contract with the external financial aid services provider. We have transitioned all financial aid and FISAP-related responsibilities in-house and designated a qualified Data Point Administrator / Director of Financial Aid to oversee the preparation of the report. Additionally, there will be multiple financial professionals reviewing future FISAP and backup data. The current year’s FISAP has already been worked on using this updated structure, and all backup documentation has been reviewed for accuracy and confirmed to match the submitted FISAP. Preventive Measures Going Forward: To ensure accuracy and prevent recurrence, the institution has implemented the following procedures: 1. The Director of Financial Aid (Data Point Administrator) will prepare all FISAP data and maintain appropriate source documentation. 2. The Financial Aid Representative will review the completed FISAP and all backup documents to verify accuracy prior to submission. 3. The Financial Controller will receive the full FISAP packet, including backup documentation for an additional review and institutional oversight. 4. All FISAP materials and supporting documents will be stored in the institution’s secure Financial Aid OneDrive folder to ensure accessibility and consistency during audits. These steps have already been implemented for the most recent FISAP cycle and will be followed annually to maintain compliance and data integrity. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Josh James, CFO Anticipated Date of Completion: 11/24/2025
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The Authority will increase oversight in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program to ensure that established internal control policies are being followed on a timely basis. Adam Bov...
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The Authority will increase oversight in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program to ensure that established internal control policies are being followed on a timely basis. Adam Bovilsky, Executive Director, is responsible for implementing this corrective action by March 31, 2026.
Student Financial Assistance – Assistance Listing No. Various Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure that students’ statuses are accurately and timely reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is...
Student Financial Assistance – Assistance Listing No. Various Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure that students’ statuses are accurately and timely reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Auditors identified two students for whom enrollment status on the campus level and program level was correctly reported to NSLDS as withdrawal in December 2024; however, both students graduated in March 2025 and that enrollment status was not updated at the campus level or the program level. We have a manual tracking procedure in place for students who complete missing coursework after their last term of enrollment that results in completion of their program. These two students were missed in that process. As a result of this finding, we have reviewed the procedure with the relevant staff and will continue to monitor the process, adding routine spot-checking of this tracking list. Names of the contact persons responsible for corrective action: Gwenn Sherburne, Registrar, and Lynette Wahl, Student Financial Aid Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 31, 2025
Condition: Controls were not in place to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) was complete and accurate. Planned Corrective Action: The Village has hired an outside contractor to assist with review of audit documents. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Pen...
Condition: Controls were not in place to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) was complete and accurate. Planned Corrective Action: The Village has hired an outside contractor to assist with review of audit documents. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Penny Ray Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2025
HRSA Grant Self-Reporting Memo Deficiencies, Investigation, Reporting and Corrective Actions January 15, 2026 RE: Grant Number (FAIN): CE152520, under Assistance Listing Number: 93.493, Award Number: CE1HS52520-01-06 (the “Grant”) Federal Award Date: 9/21/2023 Grant Title: Community Project Funding/...
HRSA Grant Self-Reporting Memo Deficiencies, Investigation, Reporting and Corrective Actions January 15, 2026 RE: Grant Number (FAIN): CE152520, under Assistance Listing Number: 93.493, Award Number: CE1HS52520-01-06 (the “Grant”) Federal Award Date: 9/21/2023 Grant Title: Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending - Construction Grantee: Spokane Guilds’ School (Unique Entity ID: DZJ5TZ4LGWH3, EIN: 91-0863163) (d/b/a Joya Child & Family Development “Joya”) 1016 N Superior St. Spokane, WA 99202 Grantee Contact: Colleen Fuchs, Executive Director Grant Purposes: Alteration and Renovation to Existing Facility, and related Equipment and other costs, to create Joya’s Neurodevelopmental Research & Training Institute Grant Amount (Per Notice of Award, Section 31. Approved Budget): e. Equipment $ 690,195.00 h. Construction/Alteration and Renovation $ 2,377,431.00 i. Other $ 117,114.00 Total Direct Costs $ 3,184,740.00 Less: Cost Sharing or Matching $ 184,740.00 Total Amount of Federal Share $ 3,000,000.00 Background: Joya’s facility was constructed from March 2021 to June 2022, and funded via private charitable contributions received from donors and a loan from Joya’s bank. The facility was placed in service in June, 2022 for a total approximate cost of $13.0 million. The facility is utilized by Joya, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, to house programs that provide physical, occupational, speech and other therapies to children with neurological and developmental delays, primarily from birth to three years of age. In Fall of 2022, Joya applied for a $3.0 million grant from HRSA to improve its facility to include a Neurodevelopmental Research & Training Institute and expand its services. The Grant was awarded to Joya, and Joya awarded a construction contract to the General Contractor who had completed its facility in 2022. The facility improvements were substantially completed in 2025. As of the date of this memo, approximately $123,000 remains available to Joya under the Grant. Procedural Deficiencies: 1. Competitive Bid (Eide Bailly Finding # 2025-001): In April 2025, during a selfreview of Joya’s compliance with 45 CFR Sections 75.326 to 75.335, specifically the required procurement procedures, management discovered that Joya’s procurement procedures were deficient in the following specific area. Joya’s policies and procedures did not require public notice to be issued regarding a competitive bidding process for the facility improvements, specifically the construction contract award, as required in the CFR. The contract was awarded to the same contractor who had recently constructed the original facility, as the contractor possessed critical knowledge of the facility along with the requisite skills to perform the improvements. However, market cost information (obtained through a public bid process) was not available. Further, a sample of nine transactions (out of 43 total transactions) indicated that contracts for three vendors between $10,000 and $250,000 required Joya to follow simplified acquisition procedures and obtain rate quotations in advance of procurement. 2. Proportion of Federal to Non-Federal Share (Eide Bailly Finding # 2025-002): Later in 2025, Joya engaged its independent CPA firm, Eide Bailly to audit its financial statements, and as part of that, to issue an opinion on its internal controls over financial reporting and on compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements. During its review, the CPA firm discovered that Joya’s procedures regarding matching/cost sharing were deficient. Joya’s policies and procedures did not have su􀆯icient internal controls to ensure that grant funds were drawn down following the required proportion of (i) the Federal Share of Grant funds in proportion to (ii) the Cost Sharing/Matching Grant funds. Following a review of Joya’s financial records, it was determined that Joya’s contribution of its Non-Federal Share of improvement costs was approximately $12,000 lower than the amount required by the defined contract proportion, through June 30, 2025. Self-Investigation and Reporting: Joya’s investigation and specifically its review of the Grant requirements and the CFR language in April 2025, along with its seeking an independent review of its internal controls resulted in identifying both procedural deficiencies described above. Corrective Actions: The following corrective actions to address the Procedural Deficiencies have all been completed, as further described below. 1. Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) timely notified its independent CPA firm, Eide Bailly, which described the internal control deficiencies in its qualified opinion to its Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control and Compliance for the year ended June 30, 2025. The CPA firm did not qualify its separate opinion to Joya’s Audited Financial Statements for the year ended June 30, 2025. 2. In April 2025, Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) sought technical guidance and approval from Joya’s board of directors and its independent CPA firm. By June 2025, Mr. Judge had updated Joya’s policies and procedures to include the required internal controls described above. 3. Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) engaged MACC Estimating Group, an independent construction estimation firm in Liberty Lake, WA, to obtain an itemized cost estimate for the facility improvements funded by the grant. The independent results issued on June 24, 2025 were only 6% higher than the awarded contractor bid. Joya’s management believes this provides a reasonable market cost for its awarded project. 4. On April 18, 2025, Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) emailed HRSA sta􀆯 members A. Glasser and C. Barnes, o􀆯icially notifying HRSA of its procurement policy deficiencies. HRSA (A. Glasser, Grants Management Specialist) responded via email on April 18, 2025, asking about the procurement process Joya ultimately used, and informing Joya as follows: “At this time, all HRSA conditions for award CE1HS52520 have been met, and you are free to draw down funds from document number 23CE1HS52520 in the Payment Management System. However, please ensure that the terms outlined on the Notice of Award dated 9/21/23 are followed. If you have specific questions regarding these terms, I am happy to discuss further.” Joya has received no further correspondence from HRSA on the matter. 5. Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) continued to monitor its procurement process and proportional cost sharing to remain in compliance with 45 CFR Sections 75.326 to 75.335. Specifically, Joya’s Accounting Policies were updated in 2025 to include the following internal controls, as reviewed and amended from time to time: “If a purchase is funded in whole or in part by a Federal Grant, any related procurement or payment must comply with Federal Grant Procurement policies and applicable Federal Regulations under 2 CFR §§ 200.317– 200.327, including, but not limited to: • Following allowable procurement methods (micro-purchase, small purchase, sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals) • Obtaining multiple quotes when required and providing public notice requesting sealed competitive bids for expenditures over $250,000 • Avoiding conflicts of interest • Ensuring that contractors have not been suspended or debarred • Documenting the basis for selection and price reasonableness • Ensuring that Joya monitors expenditures to ensure that it maintains the appropriate proportion of Federal Share of Grant funds in proportion to the Cost Sharing/Matching Grant funds”. 6. In February 2025, Joya received a private grant in the amount of $178,000 from a private donor, which served as 96% of the required shared/matching funds Joya required for the entire Grant. These and other Joya funds are su􀆯icient to meet 100% of the required shared/matching funds.
Finding Summary: The County did not have adequate controls to ensure Special Tests and Provisions requirements were met. The critical information reported did not have the required “Description of Work Performed” included on the reports. Corrective Action Plan: Eureka County will fill in all boxes o...
Finding Summary: The County did not have adequate controls to ensure Special Tests and Provisions requirements were met. The critical information reported did not have the required “Description of Work Performed” included on the reports. Corrective Action Plan: Eureka County will fill in all boxes on the grant report when being submitted to the Nevada Division of Emergency Management. Responsible Individual: Jayme Halpin, Assistant Public Works Director Anticipated Completion Date: Eureka County will amend the past quarterly reports and any future quarterly reports to reflect actual work performed on the report. This will be completed by January 29, 2026.
Finding Summary: The County did not have adequate internal controls to ensure reporting requirements were met. The critical information reported did not reconcile to supporting documentation related to reimbursement amounts, for one report out of three tested reports. Corrective Action Plan: Eureka ...
Finding Summary: The County did not have adequate internal controls to ensure reporting requirements were met. The critical information reported did not reconcile to supporting documentation related to reimbursement amounts, for one report out of three tested reports. Corrective Action Plan: Eureka County will submit quarterly reports which reflect the actual reimbursement received during that quarter. Responsible Individual: Jayme Halpin, Assistant Public Works Director Anticipated Completion Date: Public Works will correct the quarterly reports with the State Department of Conservation and Natural Resources to ensure the reports reflect actual revenue received during the quarter being reported. This will be completed by January 29, 2026.
2025-001 – Direct Costs-Compensation Grantor: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - Aids Activity and Coordinating Office (AACO), National Institute of Health Award Name: High Impact HIV Prevention and Surveillance Programs, Research and Development Assistance Listing Number: 93.940, 93.838 A...
2025-001 – Direct Costs-Compensation Grantor: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - Aids Activity and Coordinating Office (AACO), National Institute of Health Award Name: High Impact HIV Prevention and Surveillance Programs, Research and Development Assistance Listing Number: 93.940, 93.838 Assistance Listing Title: HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based, Lung Diseases Award Year: July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 Award Numbers: CP4043 and CP5043 (2220536), 1OT2HL161847-01 Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management acknowledges the finding related to delayed effort report certification. We recognize the importance of timely and accurate effort reporting as well as ensuring compliance with federal and institutional requirements. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute has implemented a new Effort Compensation Compliance system for effective July 1, 2025. This new system will enhance monitoring of timely effort certifications through automated reminders and greater transparency. With this implementation, training and reference materials will be provided to all personnel involved in effort reporting to ensure they understand the importance of timely certification and the potential impact of delays on grant compliance.
« 1 42 43 45 46 749 »