Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
51,863
In database
Filtered Results
49,056
Matching current filters
Showing Page
172 of 1963
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Corrective Action Plan Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Findings: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions Planned in Response to Finding: Management acknowledges that the late engagement of the external auditors contributed to the delayed completion and submission of the Singl...
Corrective Action Plan Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Findings: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions Planned in Response to Finding: Management acknowledges that the late engagement of the external auditors contributed to the delayed completion and submission of the Single Audit. To prevent recurrence, management will establish a proactive annual audit planning schedule that ensures auditor engagement well in advance of the reporting deadline Official Responsible for Ensuring CAP: Paul Walker, Chief Executive Officer Planned Completion Date for CAP: Immediately Plan to Monitor Completion of CAP: Management will maintain an annual audit calendar with milestone dates for financial statement preparation, auditor fieldwork, and report submission. The CEO will review progress monthly to ensure timely completion.
View Audit 371016 Questioned Costs: $1
Corrective Action Plan Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Findings: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions Planned in Response to Finding: In response to the finding, management will reinforce its expenditure approval policy by requiring all purchases and payments to have compl...
Corrective Action Plan Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Findings: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions Planned in Response to Finding: In response to the finding, management will reinforce its expenditure approval policy by requiring all purchases and payments to have complete documentation and pre-approval from the appropriate level of management. Will perform quarterly internal audits to ensure ongoing compliance. Official Responsible for Ensuring CAP: Paul Walker, Chief Executive Officer Planned Completion Date for CAP: Immediately Plan to Monitor Completion of CAP: The CEO will convene quarterly meetings with the Finance and Compliance departments to review sampled federal transactions for proper documentation and approval. A compliance checklist will be completed and retained for monitoring.
The Project submitted its financial statement audit to HUD in early October 2024 immediately after access to the REAC FASSUB system was established.
The Project submitted its financial statement audit to HUD in early October 2024 immediately after access to the REAC FASSUB system was established.
The shortage to the security deposit account was funded in August and September 2024 to correct the deficiency
The shortage to the security deposit account was funded in August and September 2024 to correct the deficiency
View Audit 371015 Questioned Costs: $1
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds -Assistance Listing #21.027 Recommendation: We recommend the City implement procedures to ensure the accuracy of quarterly reporting and maintain supporting documentation for each of the amounts reported. Explanation of disagreement with audit findin...
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds -Assistance Listing #21.027 Recommendation: We recommend the City implement procedures to ensure the accuracy of quarterly reporting and maintain supporting documentation for each of the amounts reported. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: All quarterly reports were reviewed and combined into a single report. All obligations and expenses as of 6/30/2024 were examined and a determination of correct obligation and expenses was determined. These new numbers will be used for the next reporting period. The new report will continue to be used moving forward. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Angie Murray Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 10/15/2025
Congressionally Mandated Projects - Assistance Listing #66.202 Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen its internal controls over federal reporting requirements to ensure timely compliance with all federal reporting deadlines. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no...
Congressionally Mandated Projects - Assistance Listing #66.202 Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen its internal controls over federal reporting requirements to ensure timely compliance with all federal reporting deadlines. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Department personnel inquired, through their contact for the grant, about the reporting requirements. Multiple reimbursement requests were submitted and the all payments were received. No notification was received regarding any missing reports. As of 7/24/2025, all reporting was up to date. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Angie Murray Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 7/24/2025
The District is in the process of reviewing its procurement practices and intends to implement a formal policy in alignment with state and federal requirements. Coordination with Burleigh County will continue to ensure compliance and proper documentation of procurement activities.
The District is in the process of reviewing its procurement practices and intends to implement a formal policy in alignment with state and federal requirements. Coordination with Burleigh County will continue to ensure compliance and proper documentation of procurement activities.
The District is in the process of reviewing its procurement practices and intends to implement a formal policy in alignment with state and federal requirements. Coordination with Burleigh County will continue to ensure compliance and proper documentation of procurement activities.
The District is in the process of reviewing its procurement practices and intends to implement a formal policy in alignment with state and federal requirements. Coordination with Burleigh County will continue to ensure compliance and proper documentation of procurement activities.
Management concurs with the audit recommendation and is taking the following corrective actions to improve cash management efficiency and ensure accurate and timely financial reporting: The District will implement a policy requiring that reimbursement requests are submitted at least quarterly to the...
Management concurs with the audit recommendation and is taking the following corrective actions to improve cash management efficiency and ensure accurate and timely financial reporting: The District will implement a policy requiring that reimbursement requests are submitted at least quarterly to the grant administrator and reconciled to the SF-425 reporting. • This policy will ensure that federal drawdowns are performed timely and aligned with actual expenditures, improving cash flow management and reducing the risk of reporting discrepancies. • Procedures will reconcile all reimbursement requests with SF-425 financial reports to confirm that expenditures are accurately and consistently reflected in the corresponding SF-425 report, in compliance with 2 CFR 200.305 and 2 CFR 200.328. • Management will ensure staff is adequately trained in grant administration and financial reporting. These sessions will cover federal cash management standards, SF-425 reporting procedures, and internal controls to ensure consistency and compliance. These actions reflect the District’s commitment to improving financial management practices, enhancing grant compliance, and ensuring the timely and accurate reporting of federally funded expenditures.
In 2020, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) was the sole bidder for the District’s camera project. The selected camera vendor was Hanwha Vision. In 2023, ITS was sold. At the time of the sale, ITS had only completed a portion of the project. On February 22, 2023, the District extended the GIS ...
In 2020, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) was the sole bidder for the District’s camera project. The selected camera vendor was Hanwha Vision. In 2023, ITS was sold. At the time of the sale, ITS had only completed a portion of the project. On February 22, 2023, the District extended the GIS contract of Environmental Science Services (ES2) through February 17, 2024, and transferred the remaining scope of the camera project from ITS to ES2. The camera technology was integrated into the GIS environment for the District. The remaining cameras to be installed were purchased under the ES2 2023 contract at a lower price than in the ITS 2020 awarded low bid. In retrospect, the District should have rebid the project because the cameras were funded under the Port Security Grant Program (PSGP). The oversight was mainly caused by the transition of District executive personnel starting in 2023. Though this was an oversight, the camera technology integrated in the GIS environment increases the Port’s safety and security posture. The District now adheres to its newly adopted Procurement Policy to prevent recurrence. Management will ensure the following processes are added to the financial management policies and procedures over federal and state funds to ensure full compliance with federal procurement standards, Louisiana Bid Law, Procurement Code, contract management protocols, and grant administration requirements: • The District is reviewing and updating its procurement policies to ensure alignment with federal procurement regulations, including those outlined in 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance). All PSGP-funded procurements will be subject to competitive bidding procedures, proper documentation, and approval protocols to ensure transparency and compliance. • The District has reinforced its procurement procedures to ensure that all purchases exceeding $60,000 are formally advertised and awarded in accordance with Louisiana Revised Statute 38:2212. For purchases between $30,000 and $60,000, staff are required to obtain, document, and retain at least three competitive quotes in the procurement file. No significant purchases will be made without prior approval from the governing authority. • Formal procedures have been implemented to ensure that all PSGP-related contracts are properly executed, monitored, and supported by complete documentation. These procedures will includes verification of scope, deliverables, and performance timelines prior to payment authorization along with any solicitations, bids or quotes, evaluations, approvals, and any supporting documentation required by law and internal policy.• The District has designated a marine inspector to oversee PSGP grant activities, including expenditure review, documentation standards, and reporting requirements. All disbursements will be cross-checked against the approved Investment Justification (IJ) and verified for compliance with the grant’s period of performance. • Management is actively consulting with FEMA to assess the allowability of identified questioned costs. The District will follow FEMA’s guidance to resolve any discrepancies and ensure that all expenditures meet federal standards. • Mandatory training sessions are being scheduled for staff involved in procurement, contract management, and grant administration. These sessions will cover federal compliance requirements, internal control
View Audit 370980 Questioned Costs: $1
Management disagrees with the following A) Management determined the expenditures charged to the 2021-#3 project MSOC Security Sustainment Costs, for camera, installation and project management were clearly related to the Investment justification which requested sustainment and upgrade to the existi...
Management disagrees with the following A) Management determined the expenditures charged to the 2021-#3 project MSOC Security Sustainment Costs, for camera, installation and project management were clearly related to the Investment justification which requested sustainment and upgrade to the existing MSOC the IJ states : “Investment provides maintenance and upgrades of software/hardware (I.e. servers/workstations), video surveillance management systems, operating systems, cameras systems, access control and communication systems for Plaquemines Port Harbor and Terminal District B) Management determined the questioned cost charged to the 2023-#3 project GIS for the cameras and the conference room were supported with the investment justification however management agrees the invoices for Survey totaling $95,900 should not have been changed to the grant. C) Management determined the expenditures charged to the 2023-#4 project Cybersecurity Network and IT: For Datto Backup, which is the name of the program, and cyber security training are valid expenses and align with the investment justification Management will ensure the following processes are added to the financial management policies and procedures over federal and state funds • The District will establish formal procedures requiring that all PSGP expenditures be cross-checked against the approved Investment Justification (IJ) and verified for compliance with the grant’s period of performance prior to payment. No disbursement of federal funds will occur unless documentation demonstrates that the expenditure directly aligns with the approved grant scope and timing. • This documentation will be required within the system in order to process payments to the vendor. • The District will consult with FEMA to assess the allowability of identified questioned costs. Management will follow FEMA’s guidance to resolve any discrepancies and ensure that all expenditures meet federal standards. • Mandatory training sessions are being scheduled for staff involved in grant administration and financial management. These sessions will cover Uniform Guidance requirements, documentation standards, and procedures for verifying expenditure eligibility under PSGP. These actions reflect the District’s commitment to regulatory compliance, fiscal responsibility, and continuous improvement in federal grant management practices.
View Audit 370980 Questioned Costs: $1
Management agrees with the finding and will evaluate expenditures of federal awards each year to ensure the filings are done timely.
Management agrees with the finding and will evaluate expenditures of federal awards each year to ensure the filings are done timely.
The County has discussed and the County Treasurer has developed a procedure to record the federal awards by project and by department. The spreadsheet shall provide the reporting information of expenditures of federal awards and the awards received.
The County has discussed and the County Treasurer has developed a procedure to record the federal awards by project and by department. The spreadsheet shall provide the reporting information of expenditures of federal awards and the awards received.
The county will implement procedures to ensure when a contractor is paid with federal funds, sam.gov will be utilized to verify the entity has not been suspended or disbarred and such procedure will be documented.
The county will implement procedures to ensure when a contractor is paid with federal funds, sam.gov will be utilized to verify the entity has not been suspended or disbarred and such procedure will be documented.
Finding 1160892 (2024-001)
Material Weakness 2024
The Organization will revisit the internal control process around invoice submissions and reimbursement request review. The Organization has since hired an outsourced accountant to assist with record keeping and assisting with ensuring compliance with Uniform Guidance. The Organization strives to re...
The Organization will revisit the internal control process around invoice submissions and reimbursement request review. The Organization has since hired an outsourced accountant to assist with record keeping and assisting with ensuring compliance with Uniform Guidance. The Organization strives to remain compliant with Uniform Guidance in all respects to present both accurate and transparent records. If the Missouri Department of Social Services or the U.S. Department of the Treasury have questions regarding this plan, please call Jennifer Gadsky, MSW, LCSW, Executive Director, at (314)-938-4414.
View Audit 370963 Questioned Costs: $1
United States Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.063 Condition: During our audit procedures, we noted that the 1 student withdrawal did not have a return to Title IV calculation completed timely as the student officially withdrew 8/29/23 and the calcula...
United States Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.063 Condition: During our audit procedures, we noted that the 1 student withdrawal did not have a return to Title IV calculation completed timely as the student officially withdrew 8/29/23 and the calculation was not completed until 3/24/25. We also noted that the calculation that was performed did not include documentation of the control process to review and approve the calculations prior to changes being made to the student’s award. Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend the institution maintain proper documentation in accordance with federal grantor requirements and ensure that the documents are readily available for review upon request, including monitoring of students with triggering events that require a return to Title IV calculation to be completed, reviewed, and approved. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The University has implemented a new SIS and Financial Aid processing system. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Qiana Hall, Associate VP of Enrollment Services Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025
View Audit 370945 Questioned Costs: $1
United States Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Condition: Under an institution’s Program Participation Agreement with the Department of Education and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, schools must protect student financial aid in...
United States Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Condition: Under an institution’s Program Participation Agreement with the Department of Education and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, schools must protect student financial aid information, with particular attention to information provided to institutions by the Department or otherwise obtained in support of the administration of the federal student financial aid programs. Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend the University engage a third party or perform the risk assessment for the two areas required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that have not been completed and documented and ensure that there are documented safeguards for identified risks. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The University has implemented a new SIS and Financial Aid processing system. The new systems are Jenzebar products and are fully compliant. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Qiana Hall, Associate VP of Enrollment Services Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025
United States Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Condition: Students tested in the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) reporting were not properly reported based upon University documents, including disbursement dates a...
United States Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Condition: Students tested in the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) reporting were not properly reported based upon University documents, including disbursement dates and applied dates. Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend that the University strengthen its internal controls to ensure that all disbursement dates are reported to COD accurately and timely. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The previous SIS was subject to frequent interruptions which prevent timely data exchange with COD. Beginning with the 2024-2025 award year a new financial aid processing system was implemented. The new processing system is a more secure environment and hosted by Jenzabar for added compliance assurance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Qiana Hall, Associate VP of Enrollment Services Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025
United States Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Condition: Student checks related to student refunds of Title IV federal financial aid was outstanding more than 240 days as of June 30, 2024. Auditors’ Recommendation: We reco...
United States Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Condition: Student checks related to student refunds of Title IV federal financial aid was outstanding more than 240 days as of June 30, 2024. Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend that the University review its procedures related to outstanding student refund checks to ensure they are being returned to the Department of Education after 240 days. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The University engaged an external consultant in June 2023, hired a new staff accountant in September 2023 and a CFO in November 2023. The University is implementing financial internal controls policies and processes to improve the financial statements preparation and preparation of the schedule of expenditures and federal awards and ensure compliance with the DOE. This includes procedures related to outstanding student refund checks over 240 days. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Denise Johnson, Interim Controller, Bursar Dept. Supervisor Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025
View Audit 370945 Questioned Costs: $1
United States Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Condition: 2 students of the 22 students selected for eligibility did not maintain academic satisfactory progress and were on probation but did not receive notifications. Audit...
United States Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Condition: 2 students of the 22 students selected for eligibility did not maintain academic satisfactory progress and were on probation but did not receive notifications. Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend that the University review its satisfactory academic progress policy to ensure that all notifications are completed as required. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The University has implemented a new SIS and Financial Aid processing system. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Qiana Hall, Associate VP of Enrollment Services Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025
MATERIAL WEAKNESS Segregation of Duties and Control Documentation Recommendation: The University should evaluate their financial reporting processes and controls, including the segregation of duties among its internal staff (including number of internal staff), to determine whether additional proces...
MATERIAL WEAKNESS Segregation of Duties and Control Documentation Recommendation: The University should evaluate their financial reporting processes and controls, including the segregation of duties among its internal staff (including number of internal staff), to determine whether additional processes and controls over the financial records of the University are complete, accurate, and retained to support the University’s financial statement prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The University engaged an external consultant in June 2023, hired a new staff accountant in September 2023 and a CFO in November 2023. The University has begun to restructure all accounting and reconciliation functions, including implementation of new accounting software. The University is implementing financial internal controls to improve the financial statements preparation and preparation of the schedule of expenditures and federal awards. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Dr. Sean Huddleston, President & CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025
MATERIAL WEAKNESS Financial Statement Preparation Recommendation: We recommend that management review controls related to financial statement preparation review at the end of each period. Financial statement preparation should include a review of reconciliations and balances to ensure that financial...
MATERIAL WEAKNESS Financial Statement Preparation Recommendation: We recommend that management review controls related to financial statement preparation review at the end of each period. Financial statement preparation should include a review of reconciliations and balances to ensure that financial statement line items are properly stated and classified. Internally prepared financial statements should also be thoroughly reviewed by members of the board and management outside the finance department on a periodic (monthly or quarterly) basis. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The University engaged an external consultant in June 2023, hired a new staff accountant in September 2023 and a CFO in November 2023. The University has begun to restructure all accounting and reconciliation functions, including implementation of new accounting software. The University is implementing financial internal controls to improve the financial statements preparation and preparation of the schedule of expenditures and federal awards. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Dr. Sean Huddleston, President & CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025
Cause: Costs charged on the vendor invoice were not separated between allowable activity, broadband infrastructure development, and unallowable activity, electrical infrastructure development. Corrective Action Plan: “The corrective action has already been taken prior to audit completion. The costs ...
Cause: Costs charged on the vendor invoice were not separated between allowable activity, broadband infrastructure development, and unallowable activity, electrical infrastructure development. Corrective Action Plan: “The corrective action has already been taken prior to audit completion. The costs related to unallowable activities have been reimbursed to the grant in the form of an offset against May 2025 draw to correct the error. All project expenditures incurred to date were reviewed to confirm there were no additional unallowable charges. Training was provided to contractors and subcontractors involved with the project to ensure a thorough understanding of the importance of maintaining separate accounting records for grant and non-grant projects. Furthermore, all personnel involved in grant administration, including project managers and finance staff, are required to attend training on federal grant compliance. Going forward, project and support teams will perform a more comprehensive review of project invoices and billing details as well as monitor project’s spend variances more closely to ensure grant compliance.”
View Audit 370943 Questioned Costs: $1
Cause: The size and rurality of the Cooperative does not allow for the employment of additional staff to alleviate this condition, as the costs exceed the benefits. Corrective Action Plan: “NETC Management continues to evaluate costs of internally employing resources in comparison with related benef...
Cause: The size and rurality of the Cooperative does not allow for the employment of additional staff to alleviate this condition, as the costs exceed the benefits. Corrective Action Plan: “NETC Management continues to evaluate costs of internally employing resources in comparison with related benefits. Additional efforts shall be placed on implementing additional training and internal controls, as well as working with third party auditors to ensure GAAP compliance.”
« 1 170 171 173 174 1963 »