Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
57,859
In database
Filtered Results
54,763
Matching current filters
Showing Page
172 of 2191
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Brooklyn Law School Single Audit Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ending June 30, 2025 Section III - Federal Awards Findings and Questioned Costs Finding 2025-001: Significant Deficiency - NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Criteria: Title IV regulations (34 CFR 685.309(b)) require that upon receipt of a...
Brooklyn Law School Single Audit Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ending June 30, 2025 Section III - Federal Awards Findings and Questioned Costs Finding 2025-001: Significant Deficiency - NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Criteria: Title IV regulations (34 CFR 685.309(b)) require that upon receipt of an enrollment report from the Secretary of the Department of Education (Secretary), institutions must update all information included in the report and return the report to the Secretary: (I) in the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary; and (ii) within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary. Unless the institution expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, an institution must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the institution discovers that: (i) a loan under Title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the institution, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a halftime basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended or (ii) a student who is enrolled at the institution and who received a loan under Title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. Condition: The Law School did not notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely manner for 23 students with status changes in our sample of 25 students. For 2 out of 25 students selected in the sample, the effective date that was reported to the NSLDS did not match the date that the student changed status. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Cause: The Law School's controls surrounding the reporting of students’ statuses and status effective dates to the NSLDS did not appropriately ensure the information was submitted accurately or timely. Effect: The accuracy of the Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by schools. If an institution does not review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, effective dates of the enrollment status, and the anticipated completion dates, then the Title IV student loan records will be inaccurate. Recommendation: We recommend that the Law School review its procedures for student status changes and NSLDS notifications to ensure there are follow-up and review procedures being performed for all students with status changes at the Law School to ensure accurate and timely reporting. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding, The Director of Financial Aid and the Registrar will implement procedures and controls in fiscal 2026 to ensure accurate and timely updating of the enrollment reports to NSLDS. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026 Responsible Person: John K. Zhang, Vice President for Finance and Board Treasurer (718)-780-7503 - john.zhang@brooklaw.edu
The District will review federal procurement requirements to ensure proper compliance.
The District will review federal procurement requirements to ensure proper compliance.
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal policies and procedures requiring remittance of federal funds directly to subrecipients, rather than paying vendors on the sub...
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal policies and procedures requiring remittance of federal funds directly to subrecipients, rather than paying vendors on the subrecipient's behalf. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Effective October 1, 2025, all subrecipients were notified that payments would be made only to them, requiring them to directly pay their contractors and vendors. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Lee McKenzie, OARN Grant Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 1, 2025
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal policies and procedures requiring timesheets and payroll registers to be reviewed and approved, with such review and approval ...
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal policies and procedures requiring timesheets and payroll registers to be reviewed and approved, with such review and approval clearly documented. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Effective January 1, 2026, the process for timesheet review has been updated. Previously, preliminary timesheets were reviewed and approved before payroll was entered into the system. Now, all final timesheets will be reviewed, approved, and cross-referenced with payroll registers to ensure consistency. Any identified errors will be documented and promptly resolved. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Kendra Jones Planned completion date for corrective action plan: January 1, 2026
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal policies and procedures requiring the tracking and submission of performance reports within the required timeframe. Explanatio...
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal policies and procedures requiring the tracking and submission of performance reports within the required timeframe. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The late submission of OARN's Semi-Annual Progress Reports is directly related to the current EHB report format. This format is challenging because it requires specific, unique answers for each of our 19 sites but only provides fields for 10. This limitation makes accurate and comprehensive reporting impossible, as the correct response is unique to each site. While we have collaborated with EHB to modify the format, the submission is still restricted to 10 sites. Consequently, for the most recent reporting period, we completed the electronic submission for the initial 10 sites and submitted a separate emailed document containing the progress information for the remaining 9 sites. Moving forward, until the report format is permanently changed, we plan to continue using this two-part submission strategy to ensure timely reporting. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Lee McKenzie, OARN Grant Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: April 30, 2026
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal policies and procedures requiring the review and approval of performance, with such review and approval clearly documented. Ex...
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal policies and procedures requiring the review and approval of performance, with such review and approval clearly documented. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Effective January 1, 2026, the Executive Director will review a PDF copy and document approval via email of OARN's Semi-Annual Progress Reports prior to uploading into the EHB. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Kendra Jones, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: January 1, 2026
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal policies and procedures requiring timesheets to be reviewed and approved, with such review and approval clearly documented. Ex...
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal policies and procedures requiring timesheets to be reviewed and approved, with such review and approval clearly documented. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Previously, preliminary timesheets were reviewed and approved before payroll entry, but a signature was not required. The timesheet review process has been updated, effective January 1, 2026. Now, both preliminary and final timesheets require the following steps: 1. Review 2. Approval 3. Signature 4. Conversion to PDF (to prevent alteration). Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Kendra Jones, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: January 1, 2026
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend the Association design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential subrecipients, contractors, or vendors to determine they are no...
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend the Association design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential subrecipients, contractors, or vendors to determine they are not suspended or debarred prior to entering into transactions. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: OARN's vendor approval process has included the following steps:● Review and Verification: Review the Vendor Approval Form to ensure it is complete and includes all necessary documentation. Verify that the vendor is not excluded from receiving federal contracts by checking for debarment on SAM.gov. ● Decision: Approve or deny the Approval Form. ● Communication and Record-Keeping: Return a signed and dated copy to the vendor, indicating approval or denial. Enter information for all approved vendors into the grant management tracking system. OARN recognizes that an essential best practice for federal compliance is conducting semi-annual checks on SAM.gov to confirm a vendor's continued eligibility for federal funds. Effective January 1, 2026, OARN implemented a policy to review all vendors' status on SAM.gov. This initial review is scheduled for completion by February 28, 2026. A subsequent review will take place in July 2026 for any vendors involved in projects that are still ongoing. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Lee McKenzie, OARN Grant Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: February 28, 2026
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement policies and procedures to ensure the performance of subrecipient monitoring and that the monitoring is formally documented and appro...
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ‐ Construction – Assistance Listing No. 93.493 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement policies and procedures to ensure the performance of subrecipient monitoring and that the monitoring is formally documented and approved. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: OARN's current monitoring of Subrecipients has included reviewing budgets and progress reports, approving vendors, and processing drawdown requests to confirm the appropriate use of subaward funds in compliance with Federal regulations and subaward terms. However, OARN recognizes the need for a more comprehensive review process to ensure full subrecipient compliance. Therefore, we plan to request audits or financial reviews from all subrecipients. We will also require documentation demonstrating that the subrecipient has taken prompt and necessary corrective action in response to any deficiencies identified through audits, on-site reviews, or other methods related to the Federal program. OARN has created and will maintain a Subrecipient Monitoring and Approval Form that tracks receipt and review of 1) audit reports and corrective actions along with 2) checks on SAM.gov to confirm the subrecipient's continued eligibility for federal funds. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Lee McKenzie, OARN Grant Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 30, 2026
Management Response and Planned Corrective Plan: HUD approved a withdrawal of $4,279 from the reserve replacement account. The $4,279 was mistakenly withdrawn twice and has been refunded to the reserve replacement account.
Management Response and Planned Corrective Plan: HUD approved a withdrawal of $4,279 from the reserve replacement account. The $4,279 was mistakenly withdrawn twice and has been refunded to the reserve replacement account.
The Controller shall conduct a thorough review of all grants awarded during the Fiscal Year to determine the funding source of the grant (Federal, State, Local, or private) by researching grant documents, memorandums, program profiles, appropriation acts, and information obtained from government age...
The Controller shall conduct a thorough review of all grants awarded during the Fiscal Year to determine the funding source of the grant (Federal, State, Local, or private) by researching grant documents, memorandums, program profiles, appropriation acts, and information obtained from government agency Web sites. The Controller shall add new grants received to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards based on findings from the review.
The Village has discussed the finding but must consider the cost of adequate segregation of duties when determining the use of tax money.
The Village has discussed the finding but must consider the cost of adequate segregation of duties when determining the use of tax money.
Views of responsible officials and corrective action: The organization hired an individual contractor to assist with the implementation of a formal financial closing process, which includes identifying a detailed and specific process to review and reconcile procedures to ensure accurate reporting of...
Views of responsible officials and corrective action: The organization hired an individual contractor to assist with the implementation of a formal financial closing process, which includes identifying a detailed and specific process to review and reconcile procedures to ensure accurate reporting of federal expenditures and alignment with the general ledger. Responsible Individual: Okeema Polite, CEO/Executive Director Todd Falcone, Independent Contractor Bookkeeper Vannessa Lindsey, Board President Implementation Date: ACAC has begun implementing the procedures with the assignment to the Independent Contractor as of May 2025. Recommended procedures will be implemented by July 30, 2026
Finding 2025-002: Internal Controls over Compliance Responsible Individuals: Mark Miller, Accounting Manager Corrective Action Plan: Management is currently implementing review procedures and proper oversight of compliance. Anticipated Completion Date: 2026
Finding 2025-002: Internal Controls over Compliance Responsible Individuals: Mark Miller, Accounting Manager Corrective Action Plan: Management is currently implementing review procedures and proper oversight of compliance. Anticipated Completion Date: 2026
Finding 2025-001 The College concurs with the audit finding that students who withdrew at the conclusion of the fall 2024 semester were not reported to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) within the required 60-day reporting timeframe. This occurred as a result of two primary factors: (1) ...
Finding 2025-001 The College concurs with the audit finding that students who withdrew at the conclusion of the fall 2024 semester were not reported to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) within the required 60-day reporting timeframe. This occurred as a result of two primary factors: (1) the enrollment reporting schedule with the National Student Clearinghouse was outdated, and (2) the 60-day reporting requirement was not clearly defined within Allegheny’s internal processes. Allegheny recognizes the importance of timely and accurate reporting of students’ enrollment status to NSLDS. Enrollment rosters and updated enrollment statuses are regularly reported to NSLDS to ensure that changes affecting loan repayment obligations and in-school deferment eligibility are accurately reflected within the Department of Education’s records. The College is committed to strengthening its procedures to ensure continued compliance with federal reporting requirements. The College will continue to adhere to NSLDS reporting processes and required timelines. Through enhanced collaboration among the Financial Aid, Registrar’s, and Provost’s Offices, Allegheny will fully align and formalize enrollment reporting procedures. The College will review, verify, and update reporting schedules to ensure accuracy and compliance with applicable requirements. Specifically, the College will annually review its enrollment reporting schedule with the National Student Clearinghouse to ensure that enrollment data is transmitted to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) at least once every 60 calendar days, in accordance with federal reporting requirements. For students who notify the College of their intent to leave at the upcoming conclusion of a semester, the College will report the student as enrolled on the final enrollment report for that term and will then manually update the student's enrollment status to withdrawn within a few days of the report’s submission, rather than waiting for the next scheduled enrollment transmission, to ensure timely and accurate reporting. Allegheny College will implement quarterly review of processes established to ensure compliance. This proactive approach will ensure ongoing compliance with federal regulations. In addition, Allegheny College is developing a secondary review process for each enrollment report submission to identify students with recent or pending enrollment status changes. This review will serve as a quality control check to ensure that students whose enrollment status has changed since the prior reporting period are accurately identified and updated, thereby strengthening oversight and ensuring timely and compliant reporting to NSLDS.
Background During the audit, it was identified that the University did not report all required program-level record elements to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Cause The root cause of the issue was a gap in our data entry and reporting processes: • Prior to January 1 2025, majors and ...
Background During the audit, it was identified that the University did not report all required program-level record elements to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Cause The root cause of the issue was a gap in our data entry and reporting processes: • Prior to January 1 2025, majors and program-level data for domestic students were entered by the domestic enrollment team. With the transition of responsibilities to the Registrar’s Office, controls were fully aligned to ensure program-level elements were consistently captured and transmitted. Corrective Action Plan The University has taken and will continue to take the following corrective actions: 1. Process Realignment o Responsibility for capturing and validating program-level record elements has been formally assigned to the Registrar’s Office. 2. System Enhancements o Validation reports have been developed to flag missing or inconsistent program-level data prior to NSLDS submission. 3. Follow-Up Monitoring o Quarterly monitoring ensures proactive identification and correction of any missing program-level enrollment data prior to submitting data to NSLDS. Conclusion The University is committed to ensuring full compliance with NSLDS enrollment reporting requirements. We believe the corrective measures outlined above will prevent recurrence of incomplete program-level reporting and strengthen the reliability of our enrollment submissions. Sincerely, Christopher Bryan CFO
Corrective Action Plan Finding 2025-001 Condition: A journal entry was tested during the compliance audit that reclassified $50,000 of employee health costs to the school lunch fund that did not include any documentation of the costs charged to the school lunch fund and how they were allocated. Corr...
Corrective Action Plan Finding 2025-001 Condition: A journal entry was tested during the compliance audit that reclassified $50,000 of employee health costs to the school lunch fund that did not include any documentation of the costs charged to the school lunch fund and how they were allocated. Corrective Action Planned: Effective July 1, 2025, the District began to implement a structured and documented cost allocation process for employee healthcare expenses attributable to the Food Services Department. Beginning in FY26: • Charges will be processed monthly to ensure transparency, consistency, and proper budget tracking. Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing Contact: Richard Poor, Director of Finance & Operations
February 25, 2026 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR OF FINDING: June 30, 2025 AUDITOR FINDING: 2025-002 – AL# 14.181 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) Area: Eligibility In accordance with 24 CFR section 891.410, section 5.230, and OMB No. 2502-0204, owner shall re-exami...
February 25, 2026 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR OF FINDING: June 30, 2025 AUDITOR FINDING: 2025-002 – AL# 14.181 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) Area: Eligibility In accordance with 24 CFR section 891.410, section 5.230, and OMB No. 2502-0204, owner shall re-examine tenant eligibility at least every 12 months with respect to family income, composition and is required to obtain signed consent forms from assistance applicants. In accordance with HUD Multifamily Occupancy Handbook, Chapter 7, annual certification should be completed and submitted through TRACS within 15 months from previous year’s anniversary date. Based on testing performed recertifications did not occur within the required time period. It is recommended to add monitoring controls to help ensure recertifications are completed in accordance with 24 CFR section 891-410, section 5.230, and OMB No. 2502-0204. CLIENT PLANNED ACTION: (1) Annual recertification report will be reviewed monthly with ComCap Management to ensure timely completion of all recertifications. Demands will be given to tenants if recertifications are not completed within 60 days of initial notification. (2) Monthly dashboards will continue to be produced and reviewed with ComCap Management. The monthly dashboards include annual recertifications, occupancy/vacancy, and move-in/move-outs. CLIENT RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Darla Goddard, Director of Real Estate COMPLETION DATE: 01/01/2026
February 25, 2026 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR OF FINDING: June 30, 2025 AUDITOR FINDING: 2025-002 – AL# 14.157 Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Area: Eligibility In accordance with 24 CFR section 891.410, section 5.230, and OMB No. 2502-0204, owner shall re-examine tenant elig...
February 25, 2026 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR OF FINDING: June 30, 2025 AUDITOR FINDING: 2025-002 – AL# 14.157 Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) Area: Eligibility In accordance with 24 CFR section 891.410, section 5.230, and OMB No. 2502-0204, owner shall re-examine tenant eligibility at least every 12 months with respect to family income, composition and is required to obtain signed consent forms from assistance applicants. In accordance with HUD Multifamily Occupancy Handbook, Chapter 7, annual certification should be completed and submitted through TRACS within 15 months from previous year’s anniversary date. Based on testing performed recertifications did not occur within the required time period. It is recommended to add monitoring controls to help ensure recertifications are completed in accordance with 24 CFR section 891-410, section 5.230, and OMB No. 2502-0204. CLIENT PLANNED ACTION: (1) Annual recertification report will be reviewed monthly with ComCap Management to ensure timely completion of all recertifications. Demands will be given to tenants if recertifications are not completed within 60 days of initial notification. (2) Monthly dashboards will continue to be produced and reviewed with ComCap Management. The monthly dashboards include annual recertifications, occupancy/vacancy, and move-in/move-outs. CLIENT RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Darla Goddard, Director of Real Estate COMPLETION DATE: 01/01/2026
Corrective Action Plan for Greater Eastern Oregon Development Corporation Greater Eastern Oregon Development Corporation respectfully submits the following corrective action plan in response to a finding in our audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. The audit was completed by the independent...
Corrective Action Plan for Greater Eastern Oregon Development Corporation Greater Eastern Oregon Development Corporation respectfully submits the following corrective action plan in response to a finding in our audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. The audit was completed by the independent auditing firm Anderson Boylan Ramos, P.C. of Hermiston, Oregon. The finding from the June 30, 2025 audit is discussed below with the corresponding Action Plan listed. The finding from the June 30, 2025 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs are discussed below. FINDING – FEDERAL AWARD AUDIT PROGRAM AUDIT 1. Finding 2025-001 a. Reportable Instance of Noncompliance of Financial Reporting: Greater Eastern Oregon Development Corporation is required to annually report to the Economic Development Administration on the EDA Cares RLF. Amounts reported on the June 30, 2024 report did not agree to the underlying financial data and were incorrectly reported by category. b. Recommendation: We recommend that employees involved in the reporting process review from ED-209 reporting rules and regulations. It is also recommended that any incorrect reports filed with the EDA be corrected prior to the submission of the June 30, 2025 report. c. Action Taken: As recommended, employees that are involved in the reporting process will review reporting rules and regulations. GEODC will also correct any incorrect filings with the EDA in regards to its reporting on the EDA Cares RLF. d. Responsible Party: Tory Stinnett, Executive Director e. Anticipated Completion Date: The Corporation anticipates taking corrective action for the June 30, 2024 report prior to filing the most recent June 30, 2025 report.
Criteria: Neither the PHA nor any of its contractors or subcontractors may enter into any contract or arrangement in connection with the HCV program in which any of the following classes of persons has any interest, direct or indirect, during tenure or for one year thereafter (2) Any employee of the...
Criteria: Neither the PHA nor any of its contractors or subcontractors may enter into any contract or arrangement in connection with the HCV program in which any of the following classes of persons has any interest, direct or indirect, during tenure or for one year thereafter (2) Any employee of the PA, or any contractor, subcontractor or agent of the PHA, who formulates policy or who influences decisions with respect to the programs (24 CFR sections 982.161). Condition: During the audit, it was noted that multiple (3) participants of the HCV program were either employees or relatives of employees. Context: According to 24 CFR 982.161, any employee who exercise authority over the PHA cannot receive benefits. However, past OIG action has issued findings to Public Housing Authority entitles when any employee and immediate family member receives benefits as unallowable cost. The OIG's concern seems to be that the tenant may have received special treatment at admission or is currently receiving special treatment related to rent calculation, unit inspections, etc. The OIG regarded the HAP costs as ineligible and recommended that the PHA re-pay the funds. Cause: The non-compliance appears to stem from ambiguity in the Housing Authority's policy relating to Conflict of Interest. Effect: The Conflict of Interest undermines the community's trust with the Housing Choice Vouchers Program. It also represents a risk of improper use of federal funds and can impact the credibility and effectiveness of the program. Recommendations: Update the Authority's Conflict of Interest policy and implement more stringent procedures for monitoring Conflict of Interest. Questioned Costs: The exact monetary impact needs further investigation to determine the amount of HAP that should have been unallowable for the period of non-compliance. Management Views: Management Agrees - see Corrective Action Plan ecommended in the Independent Auditor's Report as it pertains to internal controls over our HCV program. Please note, our agency is in the midst of transitioning between executive directors - therefore, we request additional time so that our personnel policy can be gone through by our new executive director, after which such individual is hired, reviewed by our agency attorney, and then approved by our board of commissioners. This process will take additional time to complete. Our agency will review its internal control over annual policy reviews to ensure that all policies, not just our "Coriflict of Interest Policy", are adhered to. Below is our current HACPFC Coriflict of Interest Policy, followed by our proposed amended Coriflict of Interest Policy. You are to avoid placing yourself in a position that may create or lead to a conflict of interest or the appearance of one. A conflict of interest exists when there is evidence of or the appearance that a commissioner's/employee's personal interests have influenced or may influence HACPFC transactions or operations, or that these interests take precedence over the interests, goals, and/or mission of HACPFC. Or a situation where a benefit or advantage of an economic or tangible nature that might inure to an HACPFC employee, creates a potential bias or loss of independence of judgment in the performance of that employee's or Commissioner's duties. For the purpose of this policy, a relative is defined as a spouse/significant other, parent, sibling, child, grandchild, grandparent, parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, daughter-in-law, son in-law, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, cousin, stepparent, or stepchild. An actual, potential, or perceived conflict of interest occurs when an employee, contractor, agent, officer, or member of the Board of Commissioners is in a position to influence a decision that may result in a personal gain for that employee or for a relative as a result of the HACPFC's business dealings. Employees need to refrain from conducting business that presents a conflict of interest as described above. No "presumption of guilt" is created by the mere existence of a relationship with outside firms. However, if employees have any influence on transactions involving purchases, contracts, or leases, it is imperative that they disclose to the Executive Director of HACPFC as soon as possible the existence of any actual or potential conflict of interest so that safeguards can be established to protect all parties. Employees should avoid any situations which involves or may involve a conflict between their personal interest and the interest in HACPFC or any other arrangement or circumstances including family or other personal relationships, which might dissuade the employees from acting in the best interest of HACPFC. All employees will be required to sign the Employee Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form as part of employment. You are also prohibited from having any personal interest, directly or indirectly, in any transaction with HACPFC or from otherwise using your position to secure special privileges for yourself or others. You may not directly or indirectly give or receive any compensation, gift, reward or gratuity from any source other than HACPFC for any matter or service which relates directly or indirectly in any way to your work for HACPFC. You also may not accept or engage in any business, personal or professional activity that might be reasonably expected to require or induce you to disclose confidential or proprietary information regarding HACPFC or its applicants, tenants or program participants. If you have any questions regarding whether a conflict may exist, you should ask the Executive Director before engaging in the conduct at issue. Proposed Personnel Policv Change/ added language in red: Gifts: Conflict of Interest: You are to avoid placing yourself in a position that may create or lead to a conflict of interest or the appearance of one. A conflict of interest generally exists when there is evidence of or the appearance that a commissioner's/employee's personal interests have influenced or may influence HACPFC transactions or operations, or that these interests take precedence over the interests, goals, and/or mission of HACPFC.
Criteria: HUD requires that all units under the Housing Choice Vouchers Program meet specific Housing Quality Standards (HQS). In cases of failed inspections, timely re-inspections are mandatory, and if compliance is not achieved, abatement of Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) or voucher cancellatio...
Criteria: HUD requires that all units under the Housing Choice Vouchers Program meet specific Housing Quality Standards (HQS). In cases of failed inspections, timely re-inspections are mandatory, and if compliance is not achieved, abatement of Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) or voucher cancellation is required Condition: During the audit, it was noted that in one (1) instance a unit that failed its HQS inspection (life­threatening failure) did not undergo a subsequent reinspection within the proper 24-hour time period: Consequently, the required abatement of HAP or cancellation of the housing voucher was not executed. Context: This finding represents an issue within the Housing Voucher Cluster program, as it was identified in one (1) files tested out of a sample of two (2) failed inspections. It highlights a need for more rigorous enforcement and monitoring ofHQS compliance Cause: The non-compliance appears to stem from oversight or procedural lapses in the enforcement of HQS within the Housing Voucher Cluster program. This may be due to inadequate training, monitoring, or failure to adhere to established protocols Effect: This non-compliance undermines the integrity of the Housing Choice Vouchers Program and may lead to tenants living in substandard conditions. It also represents a risk of improper use of federal funds and can impact the credibility and effectiveness of the program. Recommendation: Implement more stringent procedures for monitoring HQS compliance, including timely reinspection and enforcement of HAP abatement or voucher cancellation. Enhance training for staff involved in the HQS process to ensure a thorough understanding of compliance requirements. Establish a system of regular audits to identify and rectify lapses in HQS enforcement promptly. Questioned CostsL The exact monetary impact needs further investigation to determine the amount of HAP that should have been abated for the period of non-compliance. A. HACPFC Corrective Actio11 P/all: Our staff who conduct the HCV inspections are certified in both HQS and NSP IRE Standards. This failure to re-inspect this life-threatening finding within 24 hours after the discovery was an obvious oversight by our inspection staff as they are all aware of this requirement. However, the Agency will review internal controls related to training and will ensure that all inspectors are provided with additional training to reinforce compliance with the 24-hour re-inspection requirement and follow up with the landlord to verify compliance and penalty if required. The HA CP FC will also continue to review process over the auditing of tenant files to ensure that there are no lapses in the compliance requirements. B. A1tticipated Completion Date: This is already in progress.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE AND REPORTABLE INSTANCE OF NONCOMPLIANCE – U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, PASSED THROUGH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER – FEDERAL ALN 10.553, 10.555, AND 10.582 2025-002 Internal Control Over Compliance and Repor...
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE AND REPORTABLE INSTANCE OF NONCOMPLIANCE – U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, PASSED THROUGH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER – FEDERAL ALN 10.553, 10.555, AND 10.582 2025-002 Internal Control Over Compliance and Reportable Noncompliance With Federal Procurement Requirements Finding Summary 2 CFR § 200.320 requires Independent School District No. 280 (the District) to establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with requirements applicable to its federal program expenditures, including applicable procurement requirements. The District did not have sufficient controls in place within the child nutrition cluster federal programs to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements related to methods of procurement, which resulted in reportable a instance of noncompliance. Corrective Action Plan Actions Planned – The District will review policies and procedures relating to procurement for its child nutrition cluster federal programs to ensure that multiple quotations are obtained when required and that adequate documentation is retained. The District solicited quotes and retained the necessary documentation for the noncompliant contract in fiscal year 2026. Official Responsible – The District’s Director of Finance, Heidi Savatdy. Planned Completion Date – June 30, 2026. Disagreement With or Explanation of Finding – The District agrees with this finding. Plan to Monitor – The District’s Chief Administrative Officer, Craig Holje, will monitor the implementation of these corrective actions as implemented by the Director of Finance to ensure appropriate controls over federal procurement requirements are in place and being consistently applied to ensure multiple quotations are solicited and retained for contracts awarded for goods or services in excess of the District’s micro-purchase threshold, as required by the Uniform Guidance.
McDowell County Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended June 30, 2025 Finding 2025-003 Late Submission of Data Collection Form Name of contact person: Corrective Action: Proposed Completion Date: Finding 2025-004 Inaccurate Information Entry Name of contact person: Corrective Action: Proposed Comp...
McDowell County Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended June 30, 2025 Finding 2025-003 Late Submission of Data Collection Form Name of contact person: Corrective Action: Proposed Completion Date: Finding 2025-004 Inaccurate Information Entry Name of contact person: Corrective Action: Proposed Completion Date: Corrective Actions for Findings 2025-004 also apply to State requirements and State Awards. Lynn Freeman, Medicaid Program Manager We will provide refresher trainings on household composition, electronic income/resource matches, Request for information requirements, and timely recertifications, with weekly sessions on new policy changes. Medicaid management will collaborate with upper management on solutions to enhance quality control capacity and address staffing constraints. This will include the backlog from the Hurricane Helene-related statewide recertification pause by prioritizing workload distribution. Monthly reviews will continue to be conducted to meet state-mandated requirements, with continued focus on strengthening controls. All required trainings will be completed by November 30, 2025. Section IV - State Award Findings and Question Costs Alison Bell, Finance Officer The 2024 audit report was delayed due to the County's audit firm experiencing a significant cybersecurity incident between October 2024 and February 2025; fieldwork had been completed in October however the financials could not be finished timely and subsequently the data collection was filed late. The audit firm has accepted full responsibility for the delay and informed the County that they would not longer provided audit services to counties. McDowell County issued requests for proposals to all firms qualified to perform county audits for fiscal year 2025 and intends to submit their data collection timely moving forward. June 30, 2026 Section III - Federal Award Findings and Question Costs 161
Corrective Action Plan: The University is committed to ensuring compliance with all federal, institutional, and programregulations. The University continues to enhance its internal controls, policies and procedures toensure the appropriate documentation to support is maintained. Primary Control Enha...
Corrective Action Plan: The University is committed to ensuring compliance with all federal, institutional, and programregulations. The University continues to enhance its internal controls, policies and procedures toensure the appropriate documentation to support is maintained. Primary Control Enhancements. During the next Annual Performance Report (APR) reporting cycle, the AVP for Student Affairs, TRIO and Well-being as well as the respective TRIO program director will correct the inaccurately reported Project Entry Date and First Date of Postsecondary Enrollment for affected participants. These data elements are editable within the APR system and will be updated to align with official institutional and program records. Supporting Controls and Training. To support ongoing compliance, the Federal TRIO Programs have strengthened internal controls and will continue to conduct annual reviews of policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure alignment with federal regulations and grant administration best practices. To ensure consistent implementation, monthly staff trainings are conducted using the TRIO General Guidelines. In addition, TRIO staff will continue to participate in local and national professional development opportunities to enhance grant management knowledge and standardize practices related to program administration and federal reporting. To ensure all APR reports are accurate moving forward, all APR reports will be completed prior to the deadline and the TRIO staff along with GSPAR will review for accuracy and completeness. Monitoring and Quality Assurance. To further strengthen compliance efforts, the AVP for Student Affairs, TRIO, and Well-being developed a comprehensive TRIO General Guidelines resource for program personnel. The TRIO General Guidelines will be updated to include new JCSU policies that relate to TRIO program management. Informed by Johnson C. Smith University institutional policies, federal TRIO regulations, and best practices from peer institutions, the guide addresses grant administration, record-keeping, participant eligibility, program services, fiscal management, personnel, and travel. TRIO personnel, in collaboration with the Assistant Vice President (AVP) for Student Affairs, TRIO, and Well-being, will continue to conduct regular reviews of participant files and program records to verify data accuracy and regulatory compliance prior to federal reporting. Sustained Oversight. The university will engage in continuous monitoring and evaluation to assess the effectiveness of these corrective actions, identify opportunities for improvement, and maintain full compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements. Anticipated Completion Date: June 2026
« 1 170 171 173 174 2191 »