Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
64,113
In database
Filtered Results
60,361
Matching current filters
Showing Page
173 of 2415
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Section 202 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.157 The Project is required to make a deposit into the residual receipts account within 90 days after year end in the amount of any surplus cash. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure they have the controls and processes in place t...
Section 202 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.157 The Project is required to make a deposit into the residual receipts account within 90 days after year end in the amount of any surplus cash. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure they have the controls and processes in place to make the residual receipts deposit timely. Action taken in response to finding: Management will review procedures to ensure they have the process in place to ensure timely deposit going forward. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Thomas Krolak Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 2025
Finding 1219022 (2025-002)
Material Weakness 2025
Section 232 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.157 Management is responsible for maintaining required monthly deposits into the Replacement Reserve account in accordance with the form HUD-9250. Recommendation: The Project should establish and follow a consistent monthly review process t...
Section 232 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.157 Management is responsible for maintaining required monthly deposits into the Replacement Reserve account in accordance with the form HUD-9250. Recommendation: The Project should establish and follow a consistent monthly review process to ensure all deposits are made on a timely basis. Action taken in response to finding: Management continues to review and establish processes related to review and approval to ensure monthly replacement reserve deposits are made. The missed July payment was made April of 2026. The Project currently does not have the funds to make the deposit and is working with HUD to resolve. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Thomas Krolak Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2026
Section 232 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.155 The security deposit liability needs to be funded by a security deposit asset equal to or greater than the liability. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure they have controls and processes in place to ensure the security deposi...
Section 232 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.155 The security deposit liability needs to be funded by a security deposit asset equal to or greater than the liability. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure they have controls and processes in place to ensure the security deposit liability account is properly funded at all times. Action taken in response to finding: The property sold on November 30, 2025, and the security deposit cash was transferred to the new owners at that point. The $342 shortage in cash was considered in the sale but was not transferred from operating to the security deposit cash before the sale took place. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Thomas Krolak Planned completion date for corrective action plan: November 30, 2025
Section 232 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.155 The Project is required to make a deposit into the residual receipts account within 90 days after year end in the amount of any surplus cash. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure they have the controls and processes in place t...
Section 232 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.155 The Project is required to make a deposit into the residual receipts account within 90 days after year end in the amount of any surplus cash. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure they have the controls and processes in place to make the residual receipts deposit timely. Action taken in response to finding: Management has made all required deposits to the residual receipts account as of May 2025 and the cash account was whole before the sale that took place on November 30, 2025. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Thomas Krolak Planned completion date for corrective action plan: May 31, 2025
Section 232 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.129 Distributions and payments on surplus cash notes must be within amounts permitted based upon semi-annual surplus cash calculations. Recommendation: Recommend that management account for surplus cash note payments when determining how mu...
Section 232 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.129 Distributions and payments on surplus cash notes must be within amounts permitted based upon semi-annual surplus cash calculations. Recommendation: Recommend that management account for surplus cash note payments when determining how much cash is available for distribution in accordance with the semi-annual surplus cash calculations and review those calculations for accuracy prior to distributions being made. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have surplus cash remaining at December 31, 2025, subsequent to the distributions being made, therefore the finding has corrected itself. Future distributions and payments on surplus cash notes will be monitored closely to ensure they are limited to amounts permitted. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Doug Harrison Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2026
Section 232 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.129 Management is required to retain the HUD approved management agreement to ensure payments made are in accordance with HUD requirements. The Project does not have a HUD approved management agreement. Recommendation: Recommend that manage...
Section 232 HUD-Insured Mortgage– Assistance Listing No. 14.129 Management is required to retain the HUD approved management agreement to ensure payments made are in accordance with HUD requirements. The Project does not have a HUD approved management agreement. Recommendation: Recommend that management work with HUD to have the current management agreement approved. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have contacted HUD to obtain an approved management agreement. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Doug Harrison Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2026
ALEA performed the monitoring required by 2 CFR 200.332(e) for the subrecipients reviewed and does not believe corrective action is warranted. As part of its ongoing subrecipient monitoring operations, ALEA performs the following activities: 1. ALEA documents a risk assessment for each active subrec...
ALEA performed the monitoring required by 2 CFR 200.332(e) for the subrecipients reviewed and does not believe corrective action is warranted. As part of its ongoing subrecipient monitoring operations, ALEA performs the following activities: 1. ALEA documents a risk assessment for each active subrecipient using a standardized risk assessment tool that produces an individual, supportable risk determination for each subrecipient and updates the assessment when conditions warrant, consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(c). 2. ALEA maintains a centralized monitoring schedule and tracking log that assigns monitoring activities to each subrecipient based on its risk determination and records the status, date, and results of each activity. 3. ALEA performs and documents the monitoring activities required under 2 CFR 200.332(e) and applies the risk-based monitoring tools described in 2 CFR 200.332(1) to subrecipients based on assessed risk, retaining supporting documentation in its grants management system and in each subrecipient file. 4. ALEA verifies that each subrecipient required to obtain a Single Audit under Subpart F of 2 CFR Part 200 is audited as required and reviews the results of each applicable audit, consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(g). 5. ALEA issues written management decisions on any audit findings pertaining to its subawards within six months of acceptance of the applicable audit report and resolves findings specifically related to the subaward, consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(e)(3) and (e)(4) and 2 CFR 200.521. 6. ALEA provides training to staff responsible for subrecipient monitoring and continues that training on an ongoing basis. ALEA continues to monitor its subrecipients and to maintain documentation of the monitoring activities performed under 2 CFR 200.332(e).
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency will strengthen its review and reporting procedures to ensure Federal Financial Reports (SF-425) are submitted within the required reporting deadlines. Prior to submission, financial report information will be reviewed by multiple employees to verify the accuracy a...
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency will strengthen its review and reporting procedures to ensure Federal Financial Reports (SF-425) are submitted within the required reporting deadlines. Prior to submission, financial report information will be reviewed by multiple employees to verify the accuracy and completeness of the reported data. In addition, the Agency will implement enhanced monitoring of reporting due dates and establish internal deadlines to ensure sufficient time for review and timely submission. The Grants Section will coordinate with the Programs Office and financial staff to track quarterly reporting requirements and ensure all SF-425 reports are submitted to the federal awarding agency within 30 calendar days following the end of each reporting period. These procedures are intended to improve compliance with federal reporting requirements and ensure timely reporting for effective grant oversight and monitoring.
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency will strengthen its procedures to ensure expenditures are charged only within the approved period of performance for each federal grant. Grant period dates will be monitored and reviewed by multiple divisions, including the Grants Section, Payroll Section, and Prog...
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency will strengthen its procedures to ensure expenditures are charged only within the approved period of performance for each federal grant. Grant period dates will be monitored and reviewed by multiple divisions, including the Grants Section, Payroll Section, and Programs Office, to provide additional oversight and verification. Because payroll expenditures are reported and reimbursed on a cash basis and the State payroll expense is in arrears, payroll funding allocations will be reviewed and updated prior to the end of the grant period. Specifically, grant-funded payroll charges will be evaluated at least 30 days before the grant expiration date to ensure that costs incurred after the period of performance are not charged to the grant. These enhanced monitoring and review procedures will help ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and prevent future charges outside the approved grant period.
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency has corrected the program coding within the State's financial system to ensure that each grant is associated with the appropriate Assistance Listing (CFDA) number. To strengthen internal controls and reduce the risk of similar errors in the future, grant setup and ...
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency has corrected the program coding within the State's financial system to ensure that each grant is associated with the appropriate Assistance Listing (CFDA) number. To strengthen internal controls and reduce the risk of similar errors in the future, grant setup and coding information will be subject to review by multiple individuals prior to implementation. Additionally, annual reviews will be conducted to verify that grant information recorded in the financial system is consistent with the applicable Notice of Award and other grant documentation. These measures are intended to enhance the accuracy of federal program reporting and ensure expenditures are properly attributed to the correct funding source.
The Alabama Department of Public Health will ensure all expenditures are adequately documented, based on true and accurate invoices, and allowable under the federal award. • The Immunization Division continues to reorganize with the new leadership team. Staff reviews grant guidance semi-annually, or...
The Alabama Department of Public Health will ensure all expenditures are adequately documented, based on true and accurate invoices, and allowable under the federal award. • The Immunization Division continues to reorganize with the new leadership team. Staff reviews grant guidance semi-annually, or when updated, with program grant monitoring staff to ensure compliance. • Invoices and supporting documentation are being reviewed for source documents against grant guidance by program staff and approved by Operations Manager or Division Director to ensure costs to the grant are reasonable, allowable, allocable, and consistently applied before forwarding to Finance. • Grant monitoring staff use the Risk Assessment and Subrecipient monitoring policy to ensure that all reimbursements of expenses are adequately documented, based on true and accurate invoices, and costs are allowable under the federal award. • ADPH Bureau of Financial Services has developed and required the use of a Subrecipient Field Voucher form to include certification statement referencing 2 CFR200 in regard to invoices, along with conducting ffirther reviews of invoices before uploading into STAARS for payment. • All program grant staff have access to attend all available Finance and Grant training courses. • ADPH Bureau of Financial Services has created a Grant Management Centralized Guidance Repository in the ADPH Document Library for access by all ADPH staff • ADPH Bureau of Financial Services is developing an ADPH Grant Manual. • ADPH Bureau of Financial Services will develop policies and procedures related to media usage, college awareness campaigns, and sponsorships to ensure adequate documentation is available to verify the allowability of the expenditures in relation to various programs.
There is no direct guidance detailing steps to update the FMAP rate in STAARS. Changes are made in the STAARS cost allocation test environment and then implemented in the production environment via STAARS Support. Cost allocation runs quarterly. While we initiate the entering of statistics from work...
There is no direct guidance detailing steps to update the FMAP rate in STAARS. Changes are made in the STAARS cost allocation test environment and then implemented in the production environment via STAARS Support. Cost allocation runs quarterly. While we initiate the entering of statistics from work sampling and other sources, we are at the mercy of STAARS Support to actually run cost allocation for DHR.
DHR has added additional steps related to Adult Day Care services entered in FACTS. This will ensure entered services reconcile to the approved invoice prior to approval in FACTS.
DHR has added additional steps related to Adult Day Care services entered in FACTS. This will ensure entered services reconcile to the approved invoice prior to approval in FACTS.
DHR’s Children and Family Services division is working with FACTS to implement a system enhancement for adoption subsidy extensions. However, until that enhancement is in place, the following process has been implemented: 1. A query will be run quarterly producing a report listing any children who a...
DHR’s Children and Family Services division is working with FACTS to implement a system enhancement for adoption subsidy extensions. However, until that enhancement is in place, the following process has been implemented: 1. A query will be run quarterly producing a report listing any children who are turning 18 with a federal subsidy or 19 with a state subsidy within the next 90 days and sent to the adoption unit program manager. Adoptive parents will be sent a letter explaining the extension process and detailing the information required to request a subsidy extension. a. If a request is received and the youth is eligible, an extension will be granted. b. If a request is not received, the subsidy will be end dated on the 18th or 19th birthday, depending on the type of subsidy. 2. Effective June 1, 2026, an actual end date will be entered in FACTS during approval of the subsidy.
However, if this finding is affirmed the corrective action plan will be for the Alabama Military Department to ensure all charges to support federal awards will be charged appropriately in STAARS. Accounting entries in STAARS will be allocable and allowable charges as approved by the Grants Officer.
However, if this finding is affirmed the corrective action plan will be for the Alabama Military Department to ensure all charges to support federal awards will be charged appropriately in STAARS. Accounting entries in STAARS will be allocable and allowable charges as approved by the Grants Officer.
The Alabama Emergency Management Agency (AEMA) will strengthen its subrecipient monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with the audit requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.501. AEMA will implement formal written procedures requiring the identification of subrecipients subject to Single Audit requir...
The Alabama Emergency Management Agency (AEMA) will strengthen its subrecipient monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with the audit requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.501. AEMA will implement formal written procedures requiring the identification of subrecipients subject to Single Audit requirements and the timely collection, review, and retention of applicable audit reports. AEMA will establish a centralized tracking system to monitor the receipt of required audit reports and identify subrecipients that have not submitted audits by the required due date. Designated personnel will be responsible for conducting and documenting reviews of all received audit reports to determine whether any findings, questioned costs, or deficiencies impact federally funded programs administered by AEMA. In instances where audit findings are identified, AEMA will follow up with subrecipients to obtain corrective action plans and monitor the implementation of corrective actions to ensure identified deficiencies are adequately addressed. Management will also implement periodic supervisory reviews to verify that audit reports are obtained, reviewed, and documented in accordance with federal requirements.
The Alabama Emergency Management Agency (AEMA) will develop and implement formal written procedures to ensure compliance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting requirements. These procedures will include processes for identifying all first-tier subawards subje...
The Alabama Emergency Management Agency (AEMA) will develop and implement formal written procedures to ensure compliance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting requirements. These procedures will include processes for identifying all first-tier subawards subject to FFATA reporting, verifying the accuracy and completeness of required subaward data elements, and ensuring timely reporting of applicable subawards and subaward amendments to SAM.gov within the required reporting deadlines. AEMA will establish a tracking mechanism to monitor all subawards of $30,000 or more and will assign responsibility to designated personnel for reviewing and submitting FFATA reports. Additionally, management will implement a supervisory review process to verify that all required reports have been submitted accurately and timely.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE – U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PASSED THROUGH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION 2025-001 Internal Control Over Compliance With Federal Suspension and Debarment Requirements Finding Summary 2 CFR ...
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE – U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PASSED THROUGH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION 2025-001 Internal Control Over Compliance With Federal Suspension and Debarment Requirements Finding Summary 2 CFR § 180 requires the City of Prior Lake (the City) to establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with requirements applicable to federal program expenditures, including suspension and debarment requirements applicable to the highway planning construction grant. The City did not have sufficient controls in place within its highway planning and construction grant to assure that it was not contracting for goods or services with parties that are suspended or debarred, or whose principals are suspended or debarred from participating in contracts involving the expenditures of federal program funds. Corrective Action Plan Actions Planned – The City will review policies and procedures relating to suspension and debarment for its federal programs and will ensure that all parties with which it contracts for goods or services are eligible to participate in contracts involving the expenditures of federal program funding. Official Responsible – The City’s Finance Director, Nicole Klekner. Planned Completion Date – December 31, 2026. Disagreement With or Explanation of Finding – The City agrees with this finding. Plan to Monitor – The City’s Finance Director, Nicole Klekner, will ensure appropriate controls are in place to verify that any vendor with which the City contracts for federal program goods or services exceeding $25,000 is not listed as suspended or debarred on the federal Excluded Parties List System website.
Finding 1218974 (2025-101)
Material Weakness 2025
PAYROLL CONTROLS Criteria: In accordance with the documentation standards of 2 CFR section 200.430(a), costs of compensation for personal services are allowable to the extent the total compensation for individual employees is reasonable for the services rendered, conforms to the established written ...
PAYROLL CONTROLS Criteria: In accordance with the documentation standards of 2 CFR section 200.430(a), costs of compensation for personal services are allowable to the extent the total compensation for individual employees is reasonable for the services rendered, conforms to the established written policy of the recipient or subrecipient and is determined and supported as provided in 2 CFR section 200.430(g), which states that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: Payroll testing was completed for a sample of 40 individuals for which time and expenses were charged to R&D grants. Within that selection, we noted instances where payroll controls did not function properly in regard to percentage of time allocated to a grant, proper pay code inclusion, fringe benefit calculation and timely and supervisor level review of time sheets. Context: Management was able to isolate the time allocation error to 20 employees for which the time and costs charges to the grants were in excess of actual time allocation. This resulted in $87,831.53 in excess charged to the grants. Additional control deficiencies did not result in significant improper grant expenditures. Cause: A new payroll system was implemented in fiscal 2025. Grant allocation percentages were not accurately established in the payroll system upon conversion. Effect: Time charged to grant efforts by certain individuals exceeded actual time worked. Recommendation: Review controls should be enhanced to ensure grant expenditures accurately reflect payroll costs. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: Management identified the issue early following implementation of the new payroll system and performed a detailed review to isolate the impacted population. Corrections were made to payroll allocations for the affected employees, and reimbursement adjustments were processed as appropriate. To prevent recurrence, management has implemented the following control enhancements: - Standardized procedures for establishing and validating grant allocation percentages within the payroll system; - Enhanced supervisory review requirements for time reporting and payroll approvals; - Periodic monitoring and reconciliation of payroll charges to grant budgets; - Additional training for payroll and grant accounting personnel on system configuration and compliance requirements. Responsible Parties: VP of Accounting and Controller and VP of Audit & Compliance. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed in fiscal year 2025; ongoing monitoring procedures are in place.
Finding 1218940 (2025-003)
Material Weakness 2025
Finding Number: 2025-003 Finding Title: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Reporting Program: 93.658 Foster Care Title IV-E, 93.778 Grants to States for Medicaid Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Ryan DuMond, Supervisor, Accounting Correctiv...
Finding Number: 2025-003 Finding Title: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Reporting Program: 93.658 Foster Care Title IV-E, 93.778 Grants to States for Medicaid Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Ryan DuMond, Supervisor, Accounting Corrective Action Planned: Staff will conduct thorough reviews of all Quarterly Fiscal Memos and attachments issued by DHS to ensure that reporting requirements are fully understood and applied consistently. The County will also develop and document a comprehensive procedure for preparing the DHS‑2550 and DHS‑2556 reports, including detailed instructions for entering adjustments, processing reversing entries, reporting amortization, properly coding capital purchases, and handling MAXIS‑related costs. A mandatory review process will be implemented before submission of each report to verify accuracy and compliance with DHS guidance. As part of this review, staff will closely examine expense classifications to ensure that capital outlay expenditures are accurately coded and reported, and that all required amortization expenses are correctly included. These actions will help prevent misclassification and report errors in future submissions. Anticipated Completion Date: July 2026
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-005 and agrees that the deficiency in accounting for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement constitutes a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Misclassification of individual expense ca...
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-005 and agrees that the deficiency in accounting for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement constitutes a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Misclassification of individual expense categories by $70,223 affected the accuracy of category-level reporting and increased the risk of budget overages or noncompliance where federal awards and resource sharing agreements contain line-item spending limitations or require accurate reporting by cost category. Although the error did not necessarily affect total expenditures, incorrect classification can impair oversight, distort budget-to-actual monitoring, and reduce the reliability of information used for internal and external reporting. Management determined that the root causes included insufficiently detailed written guidance for coding transactions under the resource sharing agreement, inconsistent use of account mappings between the general ledger and agreement budget categories, and inadequate review of category-level coding before expenditures were finalized and reported. Existing procedures addressed expense processing generally, but they did not provide enough direction on how shared-service or agreement-covered costs should be classified into the proper expense categories for budget monitoring and reporting. To address this material weakness, management is implementing a corrective action plan focused on improving category-level classification and reporting for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement. The plan includes four key actions: revising written accounting procedures to define category descriptions, coding rules, and decision standards; creating a standardized crosswalk between general ledger accounts and agreement budget categories; requiring supervisory review of category coding before final reporting; and implementing periodic budget-to-actual monitoring to identify unusual balances, potential overages, and coding trends that may indicate misclassification. Under the revised process, each expense charged under the resource sharing agreement will be recorded using the approved chart-of-accounts mapping and supported by documentation sufficient to identify the nature of the cost, the applicable budget category, and the reason the selected classification is appropriate. If a transaction involves a cost type that does not clearly align to an established category, accounting personnel will be required to elevate the transaction for review before posting or reporting. Any manual reclassification entries affecting agreement categories will require documented justification and supervisory approval. In addition, management will compare recorded expenditures to budgeted amounts by category on a recurring basis so that unusual fluctuations, coding anomalies, or category overages can be investigated and corrected before financial or grant reporting is finalized. Management will also provide targeted training to accounting, finance, and grants personnel responsible for recording or reviewing resource sharing agreement activity. Training will address the relationship between GAAP-based accounting records, agreement-specific budget categories, and federal compliance expectations for accurate, current, and complete financial reporting and comparison of expenditures to budget amounts. Management will supplement this training with periodic reviews of classification trends and exception items so that recurring coding issues can be identified and corrected through additional guidance, process changes, or retraining as needed. Management believes these corrective actions directly address the auditors’ recommendation to review current policies and procedures for compliance with GAAP and federal regulations. Responsibility for implementation will rest primarily with the Finance Director, in coordination with accounting and grants personnel involved in resource sharing agreement reporting. Management expects the enhanced coding guidance, account crosswalk, review controls, and category-level monitoring procedures to improve the accuracy of expense classification, strengthen budget oversight, and reduce the risk of misstatements or noncompliance related to resource sharing agreement expenditures in future periods. Corrective Action Plan Summary Corrective Action Responsible Staff/Role Target Completion Date Evidence of Completion Revise and adopt written accounting procedures for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement, including category definitions, coding rules, and documentation standards for classification decisions. Finance Director; Accounting Manager June 30, 2026 Approved procedures; updated accounting manual; staff distribution records. Develop and implement a standardized crosswalk between general ledger accounts and resource sharing agreement budget categories, including guidance for common transaction types and reclassification scenarios. Accounting Manager; Finance Director July 15, 2026 Approved account crosswalk; coding reference guide; sample mapped transactions. Require documented supervisory review of category coding for resource sharing agreement transactions before final reporting, including review of manual reclasses and higher-risk expense categories. Finance Director Effective immediately Reviewer signoff on category reports; approved reclassification support; supervisory review documentation. Provide targeted training to accounting, finance, and grants personnel on category-level expense classification, use of the crosswalk, and reporting requirements under the resource sharing agreement Compliance Officer; Finance Director August 31, 2026 Training materials; attendance logs; completed acknowledgements or knowledge checks. and applicable federal regulations. Perform monthly budget-to-actual category reviews for resource sharing agreement expenditures to identify unusual balances, potential overages, and coding anomalies requiring investigation or correction. Accounting Manager; Finance Director Monthly, beginning July 31, 2026 Monthly budget-to-actual reports; exception logs; documented follow-up and corrections. Perform quarterly monitoring of a sample of resource sharing agreement transactions to verify correct category coding, consistency with the approved crosswalk, and compliance with agreement and federal reporting requirements. Compliance Officer; Finance Director Quarterly, beginning September 30, 2026 Quarterly monitoring reports; sample testing documentation; corrective action follow-up records
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-003 and agrees that the control deficiency related to allocation of expenses within the WIOA Cluster constitutes a material weakness in internal control over compliance. This finding is distinct from Finding 2025-002 because it concerns the m...
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-003 and agrees that the control deficiency related to allocation of expenses within the WIOA Cluster constitutes a material weakness in internal control over compliance. This finding is distinct from Finding 2025-002 because it concerns the methodology, approval, and monitoring of cost allocations affecting WIOA programs, including restrictions applicable to the Youth program, rather than the allowability of costs based on timing or period of performance. Although the identified costs were corrected, the deficiency increased the risk that shared or allocable costs could be assigned to restricted programs in a manner inconsistent with federal requirements if not detected and prevented in a timely manner. Management determined that the root causes were insufficiently detailed written procedures for allocating shared costs within the WIOA Cluster, lack of explicit documentation addressing the prohibition on transfers to or from the Youth program under 20 CFR 683.130, and inconsistent supervisory review of allocation entries before posting. Existing practices addressed cost charging generally, but they did not provide enough direction on how shared expenditures benefiting multiple WIOA funding streams should be allocated, documented, reviewed, and restricted when Youth funds were involved. To address this material weakness, management is implementing four control improvements. First, it will formalize written cost allocation policies and procedures for the WIOA Cluster that define approved methodologies, documentation standards, proportional benefit requirements, and restrictions applicable to the Youth program. Second, it will require documented supervisory review and approval of all allocation entries affecting WIOA programs before posting to the general ledger. Third, it will provide targeted training to finance, grants, and program management personnel on WIOA-specific allocation requirements, with particular emphasis on Youth program restrictions. Fourth, it will implement periodic monitoring to verify that allocations follow the approved methodology and remain consistent with federal requirements. Under the revised process, each allocation affecting WIOA programs will be supported by contemporaneous documentation identifying the nature of the cost, the programs benefiting from the expenditure, the basis used to distribute the cost, and the calculation of the amounts charged to each program. When a cost benefits multiple programs and proportional benefit can be reasonably determined, the allocation will be based on that proportional benefit. When proportional benefit cannot be determined precisely, the allocation will be supported by a reasonable documented method that is applied consistently. Allocation support must also include a compliance checkpoint confirming that no allocation results in an impermissible transfer to or from the Youth program. No allocation entry affecting WIOA programs will be recorded without documented preparer support and written supervisory review evidencing compliance with internal policy and applicable regulations. Management will also establish recurring monitoring controls to test allocations recorded during the year. On at least a quarterly basis, the Finance Director or designee will review a sample of WIOA allocation entries to confirm that the approved methodology was followed, supporting documentation was retained, supervisory approval was completed, and Youth program restrictions were observed. Exceptions identified through this monitoring process will be documented, investigated, and corrected promptly, with any necessary retraining or policy revisions implemented to prevent recurrence. Results of the monitoring process will be communicated to senior management as part of ongoing oversight of federal awards compliance. Management believes these corrective actions directly address the auditors’ recommendations and strengthen controls over allocation of expenses within the WIOA Cluster without duplicating the corrective actions described in Finding 2025-002. Responsibility for implementation will rest primarily with the Finance Director, in coordination with grants and program leadership. Management expects the enhanced policy framework, approval requirements, training, and monitoring activities to reduce the risk of noncompliant allocations, improve documentation of shared cost methodologies, and support sustained compliance with 2 CFR 200.405 and 20 CFR 683.130. Corrective Action Plan Summary Corrective Action Responsible Staff/Role Target Completion Date Evidence of Completion Revise and adopt written WIOA cost allocation policies and procedures that define approved allocation methodologies, documentation requirements, proportional benefit standards, and explicit restrictions applicable to the Youth program. Finance Director; Grants Manager June 30, 2026 Approved policy and procedure document; distribution to applicable staff; retained version history. Implement a standardized allocation worksheet and review checklist for all shared costs charged to WIOA programs, including a compliance checkpoint for Youth program restrictions. Accounting Manager; Finance Director July 15, 2026 Standard allocation template; completed review checklist; sample completed allocation packages. Require documented supervisory review and approval of all allocation entries affecting WIOA programs before posting to the general ledger. Finance Director Effective immediately Signed allocation entries; reviewer signoff; journal entry support retained with monthly close documentation. Provide targeted training to finance, grants, and program personnel on 2 CFR 200.405, WIOA allocation principles, and the prohibition on transfers to or Finance Director; Compliance Officer August 31, 2026 Training materials; attendance logs; completed acknowledgements or assessments. from the Youth program under 20 CFR 683.130. Perform quarterly monitoring of a sample of WIOA allocation entries to verify adherence to the approved methodology, adequacy of support, supervisory approval, and compliance with Youth program restrictions. Finance Director; Compliance Officer Quarterly, beginning September 30, 2026 Quarterly monitoring reports; exception logs; documented corrective follow-up. Evaluate the effectiveness of the revised allocation controls and update policies, training, or monitoring procedures if deficiencies or exceptions are identified. Finance Director; Executive Leadership Semi-annually during fiscal year 2027 Management review memoranda; updated procedures; remediation tracking documentation.
Finding: 2025-002 Reportable finding considered a material weakness-Expenses incurred outside of the period of performance Effect: The organization claimed and was reimbursed for unallowable costs under 2 CFR 200.458. Failure to maintain effective controls over cost allowability increases the risk o...
Finding: 2025-002 Reportable finding considered a material weakness-Expenses incurred outside of the period of performance Effect: The organization claimed and was reimbursed for unallowable costs under 2 CFR 200.458. Failure to maintain effective controls over cost allowability increases the risk of noncompliance questioned costs, and potential repayment of federal funds. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $403,805 were identified by reviewing each transaction prior to the date and for the month after the award began to ensure there are no likely questioned costs. Recommendation for the organization from the auditor: • Formalize and implement written policies and procedures governing identification, approval, and accounting for pre-award costs. • Require documented written approval from the federal awarding agency prior to charging any pre-award costs to federal awards. • Provide training to program and finance personnel on Uniform Guidance cost allowability requirements, including 2 CFR 200.458 and 2 CFR 200.403. • Implement supervisory review controls to ensure costs charged to federal awards are incurred within the approval period of performance or have documented prior approval. Corrective Action Plan for Pre-award costs Management acknowledges the audit finding that pre-award costs were charged to multiple federal awards for expenses incurred before the approved period of performance beginning October 1, 2024. The costs were incurred without the required written prior approval from the Maryland Department of Labor (MD DOL), the pass-through entity. As a result, unallowable costs were reimbursed and later removed from the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Management determined that the issue resulted from insufficient internal controls, the absence of formal written procedures for pre-award costs, and gaps in staff understanding of Uniform Guidance requirements. To address these root causes, the organization adopted a formal written policy governing the identification, approval, documentation, and accounting of pre-award costs. The policy requires written prior approval from MD DOL before any pre-award costs may be incurred or charged to a federal award and establishes documentation, retention, and accounting standards to support compliance with 2 CFR 200.458 and 2 CFR 200.403. Third, the organization also implemented a mandatory written approval workflow requiring program and grants staff to prepare and submit a formal request to MD DOL whenever pre-award costs are anticipated. No costs may be incurred until written approval is received. Approval documentation must be retained in both the official grant file and the accounting system. This workflow is now part of the grant start-up process for all federal awards. Fourth, the organization strengthened supervisory review controls to ensure that all costs charged to federal awards fall within the approved period of performance or have documented prior approval. These controls include a pre-posting cost allowability checklist, supervisory review and approval of all federal charges, and accounting system alerts that flag costs incurred outside the period of performance. Additionally, the Compliance Officer will conduct quarterly internal compliance reviews to verify adherence to federal requirements and internal policies. Finally, the organization implemented preventive measures to ensure long-term compliance. These include maintaining a centralized grant calendar with period-of-performance dates, requiring dual review of costs charged during the first 90 days of new awards, and conducting semi-annual internal audits of federal expenditures. Any discrepancies identified will be reported to senior leadership within five business days. Management is committed to ensuring full compliance with Uniform Guidance and MD DOL requirements. All corrective actions described above have been implemented or will be fully implemented by July 31, 2026. The organization believes these actions sufficiently address the audit findings and significantly strengthen internal controls over federal award management. Corrective Action Plan Summary Corrective Action Responsible Staff/Role Target Completion Date Evidence of Completion Develop and implement formal Pre-award Cost Policy Finance Director June 1, 2026 Final approved policy; distribution email; policy posted to shared drive Establish mandatory written prior approval workflow Finance Director June 30, 2026 Completed approval request template; sample approval documentation; updated grant file checklist Conduct Uniform Guidance training Compliance Officer July 31, 2026 Training materials; attendance logs; post-training assessments Implement supervisory review controls Finance Director June 30, 2026 Completed checklists; system screenshots; supervisor sign-offs Perform quarterly internal compliance reviews Compliance Officer Quarterly, ongoing Quarterly review reports; corrective action memos (if applicable) Maintain centralized grant calendar Director of Performance and Compliance June 30, 2026 Updated grant calendar; access logs or distribution email Conduct semi-annual internal audits Compliance Officer Semi-annual, ongoing Internal audit reports; follow-up documentation Dual review of early-period charges Finance Director; Grants Manager July 1, 2026 Dual-review sign-off forms; documented approvals
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-004 and agrees that weaknesses in the review and approval of expenses represent a material weakness in internal control over compliance. The reimbursement of personal credit card expenses and the charging of those transactions to federal awar...
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-004 and agrees that weaknesses in the review and approval of expenses represent a material weakness in internal control over compliance. The reimbursement of personal credit card expenses and the charging of those transactions to federal awards resulted in unallowable costs and demonstrated a breakdown in the review process for employee reimbursements and supporting documentation. Although the known questioned costs total only $46, the broader risk is that additional unallowable, unsupported, or improperly coded expenses could be charged to federal awards if review controls are not strengthened. Management determined that the root causes included insufficiently detailed procedures for reviewing employee reimbursement requests, inconsistent verification of business purpose and allowability before reimbursement, and inadequate supervisory review of expense documentation before costs were posted to federal awards. Existing controls were not precise enough to identify personal or otherwise unallowable charges embedded within reimbursement activity, particularly when descriptions were incomplete or reviewers did not independently confirm that the expense was necessary, reasonable, properly documented, and allowable under Uniform Guidance. To address this material weakness, management is implementing a corrective action plan focused on strengthening pre-payment and pre-posting review of employee reimbursements and other expense transactions charged to federal awards. The plan includes four key actions: revising reimbursement and accounts payable procedures to require detailed support for every request; requiring documented secondary review by supervisory or finance personnel independent of the submitter; implementing exception-based review procedures for higher-risk transactions; and performing periodic post-payment monitoring to confirm that review procedures are operating effectively and that unallowable costs are promptly identified and corrected. Under the revised process, no employee reimbursement or expense charged to a federal award will be approved unless the request includes sufficient supporting documentation to allow the reviewer to determine that the cost is necessary, reasonable, allocable as applicable, consistently treated, and adequately documented in accordance with Uniform Guidance cost principles. Reviewers will be required to confirm the business purpose of the transaction, assess whether the type of cost is allowable under the terms of the award and applicable federal regulations, and verify that no personal items, duplicate charges, sales tax errors, or unsupported amounts are included. If documentation is incomplete or a charge appears questionable, the transaction will be held pending clarification, recoded to a non-federal source, or denied reimbursement as appropriate. Any unallowable expense identified after reimbursement will be promptly removed from the applicable federal award and reported through management’s corrective follow-up procedures. Management will also reinforce accountability through targeted training and oversight. Employees who prepare, review, approve, or process reimbursements and expense reports affecting federal awards will receive training on allowable cost principles, documentation expectations, and the importance of careful review under 2 CFR Part 200, including the requirement that costs be adequately documented and necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award. In addition, Finance will generate periodic exception reports highlighting reimbursement activity charged to federal awards, personal credit card reimbursements, and other transactions meeting defined risk criteria. These reports will be reviewed by management to identify trends, address control failures, and implement additional corrective measures when needed. Management believes these corrective actions directly address the auditors’ recommendations and strengthen controls over the review and approval of expenses charged to federal awards without repeating the corrective actions already established for pre-award costs, allocation methodology, or broader financial close procedures. Responsibility for implementation will rest primarily with the Finance Director, in coordination with accounts payable, grants, and program leadership. Management expects enhanced documentation standards, independent review requirements, exception-based oversight, and monitoring activities to reduce the risk of personal or otherwise unallowable expenses being reimbursed and charged to federal awards in future periods. Corrective Action Plan Summary Corrective Action Responsible Staff/Role Target Completion Date Evidence of Completion Revise and adopt written expense reimbursement and accounts payable review procedures requiring itemized receipts, documented business purpose, funding source identification, and explicit confirmation that requested costs are not personal in nature. Finance Director; Accounts Payable Supervisor June 30, 2026 Approved procedures; updated reimbursement forms; staff distribution records. Implement a standardized reimbursement review checklist requiring reviewer validation of allowability, Accounts Payable Supervisor; July 15, 2026 Completed checklist template; sample reviewed reimbursement business purpose, receipt support, coding accuracy, and identification of any personal or unsupported charges before reimbursement or posting to a federal award. Finance Director packages; approval signoff documentation. Require independent supervisory review and approval for all employee reimbursements and any expense transaction charged in whole or in part to a federal award, including personal credit card reimbursement requests. Finance Director Effective immediately Supervisor approval records; signed reimbursement packages; workflow evidence showing independent review. Provide targeted training for employees, supervisors, accounts payable, and grants personnel on allowable cost principles, documentation standards, and reviewer responsibilities for expenses affecting federal awards. Compliance Officer; Finance Director August 31, 2026 Training materials; attendance logs; completed acknowledgements or knowledge checks. Create periodic exception reports for reimbursement activity charged to federal awards, missing receipt transactions, unusual merchants, and other higher-risk expense patterns, and require documented management review of the results. Accounting Manager; Finance Director September 30, 2026 Exception report format; monthly or quarterly review logs; documented follow-up on exceptions. Perform quarterly post-payment monitoring of a sample of reimbursed expenses charged to federal awards to verify compliance with documentation, Compliance Officer; Finance Director Quarterly, beginning September 30, 2026 Quarterly monitoring reports; exception logs; evidence of recoding, recovery, or corrective follow-up. approval, and allowability requirements and to ensure prompt correction of any identified exceptions.
Finding NO. 2025-003 Wage Rate Requirements View of the University of Guam and Corrective Action Plan: During the first half of fiscal year 2025, the University was in the process of implementing corrective actions related to the prior-year finding. While procedures were in place to address the requ...
Finding NO. 2025-003 Wage Rate Requirements View of the University of Guam and Corrective Action Plan: During the first half of fiscal year 2025, the University was in the process of implementing corrective actions related to the prior-year finding. While procedures were in place to address the requirements, improvements to the retention of certified payroll documentation and related compliance support were still being implemented during the period under review. The University's Capital Projects team continues to monitor certified payroll submissions from the Contractor and applicable Subcontractors. Through ongoing coordination with the Contractor, the University has strengthened its oversight procedures to help ensure certified payroll documentation is obtained, reviewed, and retained in accordance with applicable requirements. The University will continue to enhance its monitoring and documentation practices as part of its ongoing corrective action efforts. Name of Contact Person: Zenon Belanger, Interim Director, Facilities Management and Services Proposed Completion date: Ongoing
« 1 171 172 174 175 2415 »