Corrective Action Plans

Finding No.: 2024-002 For procurements using federal funds, GMHA is permitted to use a Simplified Acquisition Threshold up to the federal limit, which is currently set at $250,000 or $7.5 million for commercial goods. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) permits a non-federal entity to use a SAT up to the federal limits, without having to follow threshold limitations imposed by state or local law. The set of criteria employed by the Ernst & Young is incomplete, and fails to give proper deference to the legal opinions of licensed attorneys. In determining to follow the federal SAT, GMHA considered the guidance of a memorandum from the Office of the Attorney General indicating substantively the same legal analysis as follows. See Memorandum from Deputy Attorney General, Solicitor Division to Chief Deputy Attorney General, Federal Simplified Acquisition Threshold and Micro-purchase Threshold, Ref: AG 22-0410 (Sept. 14, 2022). When presented with this memorandum, the auditors refused to accept its instructions stating: “We were unable to follow why the Attorney General considered the definition of a non-Federal entity in applying the requirements of §§ 200.318 through 200.327. In reviewing the aforementioned sections, there was no reference to non-Federal entities.” This statement evidences the auditors’ fundamental misunderstanding of the law. The auditors based their analysis on an amended version of the CFR, which became effective only January 2025. According the definitions in the Code of Federal Regulations in effect during the relevant 2023-2024 audit period, Guam is both a “State” and a “Non-Federal entity.” Guam Memorial Hospital Authority also falls within the definition of “Hospital” and “subrecipient.” As relevant here, 2 CFR 200.1 states: State means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any agency or instrumentality thereof exclusive of local governments. Non-Federal entity (NFE) means a State, local government, Indian Tribe, Institution of Higher Education (IHE), or nonprofit organization that carries out a Federal award as a recipient or subrecipient. Hospital means a facility licensed as a hospital under the law of any State or a facility operated as a hospital by the United States, a State, or a subdivision of a State. Subrecipient means an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a Federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency. As a Non-Federal entity, GMHA also is required to abide by the definition of “simplified acquisition threshold.” According to 2 CFR 200.1: Simplified acquisition threshold means the dollar amount below which a non-Federal entity may purchase property or services using small purchase methods (see § 200.320). Non-Federal entities adopt small purchase procedures in order to expedite the purchase of items at or below the simplified acquisition threshold. The simplified acquisition threshold for procurement activities administered under Federal awards is set by the FAR at 48 CFR part 2, subpart 2.1. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures. However, in no circumstances can this threshold exceed the dollar value established in the FAR (48 CFR part 2, subpart 2.1) for the simplified acquisition threshold. Recipients should determine if local government laws on purchasing apply. (emphasis added). This definition applies to purchasing by all non-federal entities—including GMHA. Title 2 CFR 200.317 provides: When procuring property and services under a Federal award, a State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds. The State will comply with §§ 200.321, 200.322, and 200.323 and ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes any clauses required by § 200.327. All other non-Federal entities, including subrecipients of a State, must follow the procurement standards in §§ 200.318 through 200.327. (emphasis added). As a subrecipient of Guam, GMHA would also be required to follow 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(ii), which reiterates that: “The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR.” The CFR treats the requirement that a state or local entity follow (1) its own “policies and procedures” and (2) its own small purchase “threshold” as separate requirements. The CFR applicable to most federal funds—including ARPA—only requires the hospital to follow the local “policies and procedures.” 2 CFR 200.317. The CFR requires GMHA—as a non-federal entity—to separately make a determination of an appropriate small purchase threshold based on a number of factors specific to GMHA, provided it does not exceed the federal SAT. 2 CFR 200.1; 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(ii). Procurement method selection is essentially a two-step process: (1) Make a substantive determination about the monetary cost of a proposed procurement and determine whether it is below or above an applicable threshold. Which side of a threshold a procurement falls on (and some other factors) will determine the method—sole source, RFQ, RFP, IFB—that will be used. (2) After the method is determined, an entity is then pointed to specific policies and procedures applicable to that type of procurement. The relevant factors for determining a recipient-specific SAT include an entity’s “internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures.” 2 CFR 200.1; 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(ii). For a portion of the relevant procurement period, the CFR also stated: “When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations.” This section was amended effective approximately October 1, 2024. Now, it no longer requires the recipient or sub-recipient to ascertain whether this entity-specific threshold is “authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations.” But even under the prior version, the entity only needed to consider the authorization or lack of prohibition under state or local law if it was adopting a “lower simplified acquisition threshold” than the federal SAT. 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(ii) (effective until Sept. 30, 2024) (emphasis added). GMHA determined that the federal SAT levels were appropriate, and—in any event—local law does not prohibit GMHA from adopting the federal SAT when using federal funds. GMHA’s use of the federal SAT for procurements using federal funds has been a decades long practice of our materials management, so a suggestion that it is unauthorized would be a finding quite inconsistent with GMHA’s internal controls. Highlighting the distinctness or difference between the “policies and procedures” and “threshold” requirements, is the fact that “simplified acquisition procedures” and “simplified acquisition threshold” are defined separately. See 48 CFR 2.101. And the two requirements are discussed separately in the section of the CFR discussing “informal procurement methods.” 2 CFR 200.320. Additionally, the small purchase “procedures” applicable to federal agencies, FAR Part 13, are contemplated in an entire section that is separate from the rules about the controlling SAT or other threshold. Finally, in other portions of the CFR—such as federal highway funds—the government has specifically instructed state entities to follow both the state or local “procedures” and the state or local “threshold. 23 CFR 172.7(a)(2). When the CFR wants the state government to follow state SATs, it will specifically do so. It has not put that instruction in 2 CFR 200.320. Guam law also specifically directs all persons within the Government of Guam to comply with the applicable federal law and regulations that are in conflict with or are not reflected in the Procurement Code. 5 GCA § 5501. In other words: Guam law requires GMHA to follow the federal rules. Specifically, here, the federal requirement that GMHA determine an appropriate SAT is not reflected in the local laws. GMHA, thus, must comply with the federal requirement that GMHA make a recipient-specific determination of an appropriate SAT. Even the Guam Legislature understands that the law operates in the same manner as the Attorney General’s memorandum. During a legislative hearing on June 25, 2024, Senator Sabina Perez recited the same analysis, recognizing that Guam agencies can use the federal simplified acquisition threshold when expending federal funds. See Guam Legislature, Public Hearing Bill No. 134-39 (COR) at *1:46:00-1:46:31 (June 25, 2025), available at https://www.youtube.com/live/ciXo1EEXJZI. In deciding the federal SAT applies, GMHA was also guided by precedent and guidance issued to other government entities. In 2015, when the Guam Department of Education was under a federal third-party fiduciary, it was still employing the lower local small purchase threshold. GDOE was instructed that this was inappropriate because federal law supersedes Guam law on the SAT. The federal fiduciary—consistent with USDOE instructions—required GDOE to follow the federal SAT. See Letter from John E. Hampford, Alvarez & Marsal, to Jon J.P. Fernandez, Superintendent of Guam Department of Education (Dec. 30, 2015); see also Letter from Jon J.P. Fernandez, Superintendent of Guam Department of Education to Attorney General Leevin T. Camacho and Public Auditor Benjamin J.F. Cruz (July 20, 2020). Thus, other Guam agencies have been instructed by the federal government to use the federal SAT. This is also bolstered by the case law. The Guam Supreme Court has ruled that the CARES Act funding was a federal appropriation for a specific purpose, “outside the control of the Guam Legislature.” See Story-Bernardo v. Gov’t of Guam, 2023 Guam 27 ¶ 46. ARPA funding is substantively similar to CARES Act funds, simply with additional permitted uses. Local law cannot dictate how these federal funds are spent. GMHA also considered case law from Texas federal court where a self-styled “whistleblower” sued the City of Burleson, Texas for allegedly spending in excess of their own SAT. Under Burleson’s own regulations, the local SAT was $10,000, see Rule 5.1, City Council Policy 36, City of Burleson Purchasing Policy (adopted July 2, 2018, revised Oct. 16, 2023). However, the lawsuit alleged that the city was spending in excess of this $10,000 SAT. The federal judge in that court stated: “In addition, the regulations show that “formal purchasing methods are not required” for purchases that are less than the “simplified acquisition threshold.” 2 C.F.R. § 200.1(2021). The simplified acquisition threshold is set at $250,000. 48 C.F.R. § 2.101(2021). However, Mr. Eder's complaint incorrectly alleges “upon information and belief” that the simplified acquisition threshold is $10,000. Doc. No. 37 at 12, ¶27(b). Mr. Eder's apparent misreading of the threshold for formal purchasing is central to his claim under the FCA, and it appears this concern may have arisen from simply misreading the rules, rather than any reasonable dispute under the law.” Eder v. City of Burleson, Civil No. 3:23-CV-00948-K, 2024 WL 4771408 at *5 (N.D. Tex., Nov. 13, 2024). Thus, the federal court recognized that the lower local SAT did not control. The only relevant SAT was the federal one. GMHA’s determination to use the maximum SAT allowed by the federal CFR is thus appropriate. The federal CFR rule requiring a recipient-specific SAT determination supersedes the local thresholds. If the procurement is under the federally-allowed $250,000 SAT, GMHA must still follow the local small purchase procedures. See in part 5 GCA § 5213. The auditors’ view of Guam law appears to be a clear outlier, inconsistent with a plain reading of both federal and Guam law, the opinions of both federal and local courts, the memorandum from the Attorney General’s Office, the understanding of the Guam Legislature, and the reasoned opinion of Hospital Legal Counsel. The auditors’ finding is also inconsistent with decades of GMHA procurement practice. The questioned costs based on this finding should be removed. The auditors’ (1) inability to even reference the relevant definitions from the CFR in effect at the time of the relevant audit period and (2) unwillingness to accept the legal opinions from licensed attorneys, should be a finding on the auditors’ peer review.

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN September 25, 2025 Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit The Center for Independent Documentary, Inc. (the Center) respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2024. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: AAFCPAs, Inc. 50 Washington Street Westborough, MA 01581 Audit period: January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 The finding from the December 31, 2024 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs is discussed below. FINDINGS-FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS 2024-001 Procurement Policy Recommendation: We recommend that management establish a formal procurement consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.317–327) issued by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Action Taken: We will work with the Board of Directors to establish a formal procurement policy that will include the following: • We will formalize procedures to confirm vendor eligibility, including consistent use of the SAM.gov exclusions list prior to entering contracts, and ensure documentation is retained for audit purposes. • The updated policy will outline specific steps for procurement activities at various thresholds, particularly mid-range purchases, with requirements for obtaining multiple quotes and documenting price comparisons. • In alignment with Federal guidelines, the revised policy will include a provision supporting preference for U.S.-made products and materials when feasible. • New sections will be added to address how the Center will manage vendor selection reviews, disputes, and issue resolution to promote fairness and consistency in the procurement process. • To ensure transparency and version control, the policy will include the date of each revision and a process for periodic review. The Center’s Management will implement the updated policy, coordinate training for programmatic staff, and monitor compliance with the updated procedures. We expect the revised procurement policy to be finalized and implemented by December 15, 2025. If the Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit has questions regarding this plan, please call Susan Walsh, at 339-364-1277. Sincerely yours, Susan Walsh Executive Director

2024-002 Procurement Policy Recommendation: We recommend that management amend and formally update the procurement policy to address the following critical areas: Vendor acceptance and debarment testing, definition and procedures for the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, domestic preference for procurements, procedures for handling procurement issues and policy governance and version control. Action Taken: To improve clarity, accountability, and regulatory compliance, the Finance Department will work with the Fiscal Sponsorship Department to develop The Praxis Project's procurement policy going forward. We will ensure the updated policy includes the following: · We will formalize procedures to confirm vendor eligibility, including consistent use of the SAM.gov exclusions list prior to entering contracts, and ensure documentation is retained for audit purposes. · The updated policy will outline specific steps for procurement activities at various thresholds, particularly mid-range purchases, with requirements for obtaining multiple quotes and documenting price comparisons. · In alignment with Federal guidelines, the revised policy will include a provision supporting preference for U.S .- made products and materials when feasible. · New sections will be added to address how the Organization will manage vendor selection reviews, disputes, and issue resolution to promote fairness and consistency in the procurement process. · To ensure transparency and version control, the policy will include the date of each revision and a process for periodic review. The Fiscal Sponsorship Department will implement the updated policy, coordinate training for programmatic staff, and monitor compliance with the updated procedures. We expect the revised procurement policy to be finalized and implemented by July 31, 2025. If the Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit has questions regarding this plan, please call Susan Pagel, CPA at 503-701-7173. Sincerely yours, Xavier Morales Executive Director

The contract provision will be enforced by the City of Creswell's Engineer of Record and Reviewed by the Finance Director prior to disbursement of payment to the vendor.

The Chancellor’s Office established and implemented SLFRF emergency financial assistance grants policies and procedures. The policies and procedures can be found on the following website: State Fiscal Recovery Funds - Emergency Financial Assistance for California Community College Students. These policies and procedures included a self-certification process to certify that students met SLFRF eligibility requirements, expenditure tracking and management information system data reporting, a monitoring plan, and state compliance procedures through the annual Contracted District Audit Manual for the 2021-22, 2022-23, and 2023-24 fiscal years. The Chancellor’s Office intends to include SLFRF compliance procedures in the upcoming 2024-25 fiscal year Contracted District Audit Manual. The intent of both the policies and procedures as well as the Audit requirements are intended to address the Chancellor’s Office need to: (1) maintain effective internal controls regarding its use of the applicable SLFRF Federal award funding, (2) assess each community college’s risk of potential noncompliance with SLFRF subaward federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions, and (3) validate that community colleges expended the SLFRF resources in accordance with federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions. The Chancellor’s Office will coordinate with the Department of Finance as needed to revise the funding source of expenditures that are determined to be ineligible to be supported by SLFRF resources. The Chancellor’s Office will also work with community college districts to ensure any SLFRF funds awarded to ineligible students are adjusted in districts’ accounting records to the proper state funding source. The Chancellor’s Office will continue to communicate the SLFRF emergency financial assistance grants policies and procedures to California Community districts as needed. Additionally, the Chancellor’s Office will continue to receive copies of each district’s annual audit and audit findings as determined through the Contracted District Audit Manual process. The Chancellor’s Office will also continue to review and revise the SLFRF policies and procedures, and memorandums as needed to ensure the required federal award identification information and retention process information is available to community college districts. In conclusion, the Chancellor’s Office appreciates the focus toward ensuring the successful implementation of the emergency financial assistance grant program and in support of our students’ success. The SLFRF grants provided low-income students who were disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic emergency support to continue with their enrollment, improve their economic mobility, complete their educational goals, and contribute to California’s economy in a meaningful way. Estimated Implementation Date: December 15, 2025 Contact: Chris Ferguson Executive Vice Chancellor of Finance and Strategic Initiatives California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has determined that federal award information is not always disseminated to the project managers. Caltrans will review current policies and procedures of each division and revise, if necessary, so that best practices are followed. Caltrans Internal Audits Office will be working with Local Assistance’s single audit report monitoring process and take on the responsibility to monitor for all Caltrans divisions. Estimated Implementation Date: June 2025 Contact: Ben Shelton, Chief – Caltrans Internal Audits Office Division of Risk and Strategic Management

Assistance listing number and program name: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Agency: Arizona Department of Housing (DOH) Name of contact person and title: Lori Moreno, DOH Human Resources and Procurement Administrator Anticipated completion date: March 31, 2025 Agency’s Response: Concur The Department will update written policies and procedures related to procurement to incorporate applicable aspects of Federal Regulations 2 CFR §§200.321, 200.322, 200.323, and 200.327. The updated policy will address competition through competitive bids, sole source selections, and retention of procurement documents. In addition, the policy will state the Federal requirements that are to be included in purchase orders and contracts.

Name of contact person: Michael Hardy, Chief Finance Officer. Corrective action: The Board is reviewing their procedures and policies to include a detailed review of all construction contracts that are funded by federal awards is completed by a designated member of senior management to ensure the contracts contain the provisions required by 2 CFR Appendix II, 2 CFR 200.216, and 2 CFR 200.322. Proposed completion date: The Board will implement the above procedures immediately.

Auditor’s Recommendations: We recommend the District establish a policy and implement procedures regarding large purchases related to Federal grants to insure that no vendors who are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in transactions funded through Federal grants are used. As identified above, there are several methods in which the District can verify vendors who are not suspended or debarred. The District may have the vendor provide an annual certification that is s not currently suspended, debarred, or otherwise prevented from receiving Federal dollars. In other occasions in which a single purchase is going to be made, the purchasing procedures should include looking up the vendor on the GSA website, printing a copy of the verification, and placing it in the file with the purchase order. The District has options, and it should establish what method is the least intrusive, but also effective, in complying with the requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Responsible Official’s Plan: • Specific corrective action plan for funding: The procurement Officer of SJSWCD has updated the procurement process on 12/7/23 that all contractors who will be receiving Federal monies must provide an annual certification that they are not suspended, debarred, inactive, or otherwise excluded from participating in transaction funded through Federal grants. The policy change will be approved at the next board meeting. • Timeline for completion of corrective action plan: December 7, 2023 • Employee position(s) responsible for meeting the timeline: Oralia Bridge, District Manager

Responsible Contact Person(s): Diana Clark, Associate Director Senior Corrective Action Planned: SRM for the TANF Federal grant program will be included in the SFY2024 SRM Plan. Inclusion of Risk Assessment criteria have been made and are being incorporated into the Monitoring Plan. Estimated Completion Date: 8/1/2023

Specific corrective action plan for finding: Christi Walter, Coordinator Purchasing Department along with the Dom Atcitty, Grants Specialist, will review vendors that are issued requisitions at each approval level to assist in catching $25K or more for Suspension and Debarment. A printed document from SAM.GOV verifying eligibility to Requisitions over $25K should be attached. At the initial setup of new vendors, the Purchasing Department will review vendors in SAM.GOV. A printed document from SAM.GOV verifying eligibility of vendor will be attached to the vendor file. Timeline for completion of corrective action plan: July 1, 2023 Employee position(s) responsible for meeting the timeline: Dom Atcitty, Grants Specialists; Christi Walter, CPO; Lisa Smith, Purchasing Specialist; Bellamie DeHerrera-Presley, Federal Grants Coordinator and Erica Benally, Federal Grants Specialist

The Government concurs with the auditor's findings and recommendations. The Government has since updated its procurement laws and has issued revised procurement manuals, along with issuing position-specific Standard Operating Procedures. Processes for enforcing Internal controls and adherence to procurement laws have been established and are regularly reinforced. The Government, in late January and early February 2025, conducted the Government-wide training on the updated procurement laws and re-established expectations as it pertains to processes and maintaining full and open competition. The Government has begun providing User Agencies with access to GVIBUY to enable them to perform informal solicitations in the eProcurement system. Further targeted training on this process will continue over time, ensuring User Agencies prioritize full and open competition in their procurement activities and will give the Department of Property and Procurement more oversight and compliance powers.

Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Noncompliance Over Procurement and Suspension/Debarment - Major Federal Program - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Muskogee County has hired an internal grant administrator to assist in keeping the county compliant with all local, state, and federal requirements. Efforts will be made going forward to ensure that all grant funds are properly expended. This includes that all expenditures are properly documented and that all vendors are ferderally eligible to perform services

Management Response #2022-013: Due to staff turnover in prior years and inadequate handover procedures, the Subrecipient Monitoring was not done as required. Corrective Action Plan: The Grants program management team has developed a Title X Program Manual to include a clearer Subrecipient Monitoring process that includes regular site visits and requiring supporting documentation of expenses. Furthermore, the Grants program management team will report out to the applicable internal parties on status of visits and findings on a quarterly basis. Responsible Party: Erin Flior, CDSO

FINDING 2022-001 Program: COVID-19: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds CFDA No.: 21.027 Federal Grantor: United States Department of the Treasury Passed-through: N/A Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Auditor Recommendation: We recommend the City modify and strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure that the required Uniform Guidance standards are addressed. Views of Management/Responsible Officials and Corrective Action: The City concurs with the auditor?s recommendation and will modify and strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure that the required Uniform Guidance standards are addressed. The City has never had a finding in its Single Audit before and was not aware that the procurement standards identified in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), specifically 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, had to be included in the City?s procurement policy. Being that this was the first time the City received the ARPA funding and was subject to this requirement, this deficiency came up. The City will review and bring its current policy up to date. The City also made an effort to comply when a deficiency was known. In August 2022, the City established its Debarment and Suspension policy. With this policy in place, the City will review its current process to ensure that going forward, verifications for debarment and suspension are performed for contractors prior to entering into transactions with them. Name of Responsible Person: Kim Sao, Finance Director Implementation Date: 6/30/2023

2022-004: Procurement (Significant Deficiency) Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the finding. The Authority implemented a procurement policy effective January 2022. Completion Date ? January 2022 Contact Person ? Jami Blosmo, Accounting Manager

Finding 2022-004 Subrecipient Monitoring Administration for Children and Families CFDA 93.566 Refugee and Entrant Assistance ? State Administered Programs Finding Summary: There was no documentation retained to support a secondary independent review was completed over the evaluation of subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance. Responsible Individuals: Nathan Beyer & Emily Lyons Corrective Action Plan: The process will be reviewed to ensure procedures are in place to include both the initial review of noncompliance, and a secondary review of that evaluation. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2022

Michael Fields Agricultural Institute will work with O'Leary & Anick to establish policies and procedures to monitor subrecipient's activities in compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. The organization will review such policies and procedures annually or more frequently if necessary to reflect any changes. Contact Person: Shannah Schmitt, MFAI, and Kevin O'Leary, O'Leary & Anick. Anticipated date of completion: December 2023.

The Grants Finance Department, Purchasing Department along with the Federal Grants Department will review_vendors that are issued requisitions at each approval level to assist in catching $25K or more for Suspension and_Debarment. A printed document from SAM.GOV verifying eligibility to Requisitions over $25K should be attached._At the initial setup of new vendors, the Purchasing Department will review vendors in SAM.GOV. A printed document_from SAM.GOV verifying eligibility of vendor will be attached to the vendor file.

Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Contact Person: Denise Watters, CEO Anticipated Completion Date: December 2023 Planned Corrective Action: The Club will take immediate steps to strengthen its internal controls related to procurement of goods and services. This includes the revision of our written procurement standards to align them with federal regulations and guidelines. Additionally, we will establish procedures for maintaining adequate supporting documentation that demonstrates compliance with federal procurement standards. To ensure compliance with the prohibition on contracting with suspended or debarred parties, we will verify the status of entities with whom we enter into covered transactions using methods such as checking the System of Award Management (SAM) or collecting certifications. Responsible officials will oversee the plan's implementation, and we will maintain comprehensive records to demonstrate our commitment to adhering to federal procurement regulations and guidelines. This corrective action plan is vital to achieving and sustaining compliance with federal procurement standards.