Corrective Action Plans

Corrective action plan: • IT will coordinate with HR on strengthening the separation process, to include HR running separation reports quarterly and sending to IT to cross check. Will perform regular scheduled meetings to discuss the separation process/issues. • IT is testing automatic scripts that will aid in the process and will be implemented this year. • IT will document quarterly access reviews which are already done. • IT will work on enhancing automation and controls; Will utilize AI to assist. Implementation date: May 2026 Responsible person: Chris Bunton, CIO, Texas Department of Agriculture

Management Response: The University agrees with the finding. The identified issue was isolated and only impacted fall graduates. This issue was fully addressed when the university filed its fall 2025 enrollment reporting. The university has conducted an internal audit to identify students that were reported incorrectly and has manually updated files to ensure dates were properly reflected. At current state, internal monitoring and manual edits are made if discrepancies appear. The university has been in contact with PeopleSoft software related to the issue. Should the software issue not be resolved, the university plans to continue with manual edits to ensure proper reporting. Contact Person: Stacy Ramsey, University Registrar srramse@ilstu.edu Completion Date: December 2025

Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster program and Period of Performance compliance requirements. Context: During fiscal year 2023-24, the School Corporation was a member of Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01 and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the sample of five transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the two identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. This issue was isolated to fiscal year 2024. No costs incurred outside of the period of performance were identified in fiscal year 2025. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management disagrees with part of the finding. The term “obligate” can be interpreted in various ways within our context. While we have a purchase order that was completed by September 30, we do agree that we changed vendors after September 30 and paid the non-public school directly. We agree with the finding that direct payment to a non-public school is not allowable. The purchase order is an internal written commitment to acquire the items/supplies, but it is not a binding written agreement to acquire “property” when we are purchasing supplies until it is provided to the vendor. The purchase order is authorization and approval to purchase the items/supplies. Once the purchase order is provided to the vendor, it is committed and is the binding written agreement. The invoice is an order to pay the obligation. Responsible Party and Timeline for Completion: Corrective action plan has been implemented as this finding impacted fiscal year 2024 but did not recur in fiscal year 2025. Sarah Claton, Cooperative School Services director, and Tracy Albertson, Director of Finance, will oversee the corrective action plan to monitor the cooperative on an ongoing basis.

The City will establish procedures whereby the Clerk and Manager will prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) at each fiscal year end.

The City will review the requirements for written policies and will adopt policies, as needed, or will revise its current policies as needed to comply with Uniform Guidance.

Federation of Appalachian Housing Enterprises, Inc. acknowledges that we should have been filing information for all of our grantees over $30,000 on the FFATA Sub-award Reporting System website. We have a remediation plan in place to ensure that all past grantees over $30,000 are registered on the website, and we have included FFATA registration as a step in the creation of all future RDCA grantees.

Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Planned Corrective Action: The City implemented a Vendor’s Doing Business Policy in FY 2025-26 requiring all new vendors be searched on SAM.gov and California Secretary of State prior to executing a contract, with emphasis on federal awards. Anticipated Completion Date: March 9, 2026 Responsible Contact Person: Gretchen Hoskins, Finance Director

Finding Reference: 2025-001 – Reporting Condition: During testing of reporting compliance for major federal programs, we selected three of twelve monthly OAF reports submitted during the fiscal year. For each month tested, reported amounts did not reconcile to MOFC’s internal Poundage Distribution reports and Product Code – Agencies by County reports. Specifically, we identified material variances between the OAF reports and internal distribution records, including: October 2024: ACP distributions were omitted from the OAF report, resulting in a variance of approximately 821,528 pounds (projected dollar impact of $262,889). January 2025: VA/Holiday Purchase distributions were omitted from the OAF report, resulting in a variance of approximately 310,898 pounds (projected dollar impact of $155,449). June 2025: Donated distributions, primarily Direct Retail Pickup (DRP) quantities, were omitted from the OAF report, resulting in a variance of approximately 933,505 pounds (projected dollar impact of $1,764,324). Additional differences were noted in purchased distributions of 40,399 pounds (projected dollar impact of $16,968). Although management provided explanations indicating that certain distributions were omitted in error or excluded due to differences in reporting scope, MOFC did not maintain documented reconciliations supporting the reported amounts. Evidence of review and approval demonstrating that differences were identified, investigated, and resolved prior to report submission was not provided. Views of Responsible Officials Items 1 & 2 are both failures of a report in our former ERP to include exception components and needed to be added manually when reporting. This is a result of human error. Item 3 is a result of a WIP component currently being installed into the new ERP to add in programmatic data for agency pickups. This is currently added manually for reporting purposes – also human error. Planned Corrective Action: Implementation of the Direct Retail Pickup poundage integrations into the current ERP will negate the necessity to manually enter the numbers. While this install is occurring, we will continue to manually update. Anticipated Completion Date: Initial discussions have occurred with an anticipated solution provided, tested and approved before the end of FY26 timeframe.

Finding 2025-1 Financial Statement Preparation Status: On-going Reason for Recurrence: The Authority has discussed the finding but must consider the cost of professional resources to complete a set of drafted Authority financial statements.

We recommend that the City develop and maintain policies and procedures regarding loan monitoring and ensure that all documentation of loan monitoring be maintained on an annual basis. Management's Response: The City concurs with the finding. Responsible Individual: Marti Brown, City Manager, and Joei Harrison, Finance Director. Corrective Action Plan: The City will complete all required compliance reporting for CDBG activities in the futures. Anticipated Completion Date: July 2025

Finding 2025-002 Reporting Department’s Response: Management agrees with this finding. Corrective Action: This issue arose during the onboarding of students admitted through a teach-out arrangement with a closing institution. Because these students entered under program structures that differed from NUNM’s standard enrollment models, some of the information initially received did not align with NUNM’s financial aid packaging assumptions. In two cases, cost of attendance calculations reflected full-time status when the program design required three-quarter-time treatment. While the situation was limited to a small number of students within a unique population, management recognizes that our internal coordination processes did not sufficiently account for the complexity of the teach-out transition. In particular, clearer confirmation of enrollment status and program structure should have occurred before aid was packaged and originated. Management is strengthening procedures for any future teach-out, transfer, or non-standard admissions cohorts to ensure accurate and compliant packaging from the outset. Going forward, NUNM will implement the following controls: • A standardized handoff process from Admissions to Financial Aid for special populations that documents program structure, term length, and expected enrollment level prior to packaging. • A secondary review requirement for initial aid awards for new program types or cohorts before loans are originated. • Regular cross-functional checkpoints between Admissions and Financial Aid during the setup of non-standard programs. Management views this experience as an opportunity to improve coordination and compliance during periods of institutional transition and is committed to maintaining strong controls over Title IV packaging and cost of attendance calculations. Contact: Jerry Bores Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately

We will be updating our internal procurement policy. We will also review our policy and train staff on it annually as well as with new hires during orientation to ensure that the policy is understood and followed.

Subrecipient Monitoring Responses UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; UNLV OSP has implemented a comprehensive policies and procedures document covering the entire subrecipient lifecycle, which includes internal controls such as a checklist, review of risk before issuance, a biannual sub monitoring review of financial audit, and authorized purposes review. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. The internal controls will be added by OSP to enhance sub monitoring to include a review of the budget-to-actuals for subrecipients' invoices for alignment to the project. Additional guidelines will be included in the invoice review process for the principal investigators as well. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Reporting Responses UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Management staff, independent of the preparer, will review and sign off on each report. This review process will include verifying that all information is correctly entered. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance and performance will be measured through the independent review process, where management will verify and sign off on each report to ensure accuracy. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Post Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Subrecipient Monitoring Responses UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; UNLV OSP has implemented a comprehensive policies and procedures document covering the entire subrecipient lifecycle, which includes internal controls such as a checklist, review of risk before issuance, a biannual sub monitoring review of financial audit, and authorized purposes review. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Per the UNLV OSP policy, documentation is required throughout the lifecycle and will be used for future audits. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Reporting Responses UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Management staff, independent of preparer, will review and sign off on each report. This review process will include verifying that all information is correctly entered. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance and performance will be measured through the independent review process, where management will verify and sign off on each report to ensure accuracy. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Post Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Reporting Responses CSN – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; CSN Office of Grants and Contracts Post-Award Management has advised the grant’s principal investigator (PI) that underlying documentations must match the data reported on the Annual Performance Reports submitted to the award sponsor. The CSN GEAR UP PI and GEAR UP First Year College Advisor have refined the reporting and record keeping process to ensure accurate reporting and supporting documentation is kept in compliance with the grant. The Senior Accountant of Grants and Contracts also reviews the data before each report is submitted to the sponsor. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. CSN GEAR UP PI and GEAR UP First Year College Advisor will continue to ensure accurate reporting and supporting documentation is kept in compliance. CSN Office of Grants and Contracts Post-Award Management will continue to communicate with PIs to ensure all reports have been reviewed for adequate and accurate supporting documentation prior to submission to the sponsor. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. CSN Program Director, who is the Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP) Principal Investigator (PI), is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. GBC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; o Establishment of a formal review and approval workflow requiring secondary review by the Grants Office of participants numbers prior to submission of any financial or performance report. This will require: (1) Identification of the reporting period; (2) Review of all source documents supporting reported totals; and, (3) Mathematical reconciliation of reported figures o Training provided to grant program staff and administrative personnel on documentation standards and reporting accuracy expectations. o All corrective actions were implemented immediately upon identification of the finding and will be fully in place within 30 days of notification. The revised procedures are now standard practice for all grants reporting participant numbers. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. o Reports may not be submitted to the pass-through entity without documented secondary review and written approval from the Grants Director or the Grant and Asset Coordinator. o Interim and final program reports will be reviewed to ensure: (1) Participant totals match underlying documentation; (2) Source documentation is retained and accessible; and, (3) Approval signatures are present prior to submission. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. o The Grants Director and the Director of Business Operations are responsible for oversight of grant compliance. NSU – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; NSU has reviewed the finding and has put additional measures in place to ensure compliance. Staff responsible for preparing reports were retrained and multi-layered quality checks have been implemented to safeguard integrity of data entered in shared databases. NSU’s multi-layered quality checks include written confirmations from staff involved in service activities and backup of documentation within NSU’s local storage to support the numbers being reported. The latter represents a move away from using a database that is accessible to multiple institutions to a centrally controlled location within NSU. This process outlined herein was implemented in August 2025 and ensures that the source documentation reconciles with reports and is available for auditing purposes. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. To ensure compliance, NSU staff who are responsible for the program and technical reporting have reviewed and updated internal policies and procedures relating to reporting. Performance targets and benchmarks have been reestablished and will be measured at set intervals. Any errors detected will be documented and remedied. Additionally, errors will serve as the basis for continuous improvement processes and retraining as needed. These will be documented in performance reviews. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The NSU GEAR UP Principal Investigator and First-Year College Advisor Supervisor are responsible and accountable for ensuring reporting is supported by underlying records. TMCC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; TMCC reports on the number of participants for all services rendered under the GEAR UP grant through both the Interim Progress Report (IPR) and the Final Progress Report (FPR). The identified issue concerns a discrepancy between the reported participant count on the IPR and the underlying supporting records. To ensure data accuracy going forward, TMCC will implement an additional review of participant reporting. Prior to the submission of progress reports, a second technical reviewer within the GEAR UP team would verify the participant counts entered into GEARS (GEAR UP’s designated data-reporting platform) against the supporting documentation (the attendance sheet). Should a discrepancy be identified, the GEAR UP team will follow up with the individual responsible for the data entry on GEARS to reconcile the difference. This may include requesting correction of data entry errors or obtaining additional documentation to support the reported participant count, as appropriate. Additionally, attendance sign-in sheets will be collected and retained by TMCC staff to allow for direct verification prior to reporting. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance and performance will be measured by the implementation of a second reviewer for the participant data reported through GEARS and included in the progress reporting. This review can be documented through an internal checklist, internal communication, or other appropriate records demonstrating that the participant data was reviewed and validated prior to the submission of progress reports. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Primary responsibility for accurate participant reporting will remain with the TMCC First Year College Advisor (FYCA) or other designated staff responsible for preparing grant performance reports. Responsibility for completing the secondary verification review will be assigned to a designated GEAR UP technical reviewer or program staff member who is independent of the initial data entry and report preparation. If repeat or similar observations occur, program leadership will evaluate adherence to established procedures and implement additional corrective actions, which may include staff retraining, revision of internal procedures, or reassignment of reporting responsibilities, as appropriate. UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; The UNLV OSP will continue to work with PIs to ensure there is a documented review of progress reports. PIs will be expected to demonstrate review of progress reports and provide supporting documentation for data. Additionally, if reports require financial expenditures, the Office of Sponsored Programs will require validation before submission. Communication dissemination will occur twice within the academic year. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. UNLV OSP will continue communications through Research Weekly (an internal communication newsletter) to remind PIs to ensure timely submission of progress reports and retention of records such as, lab notes, testing, populations served, activities performed, etc. to demonstrate activities supported by the grant. UNLV OSP will maintain communications with PIs to perform monitoring throughout the life of the award. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility along with the applicable Deans. UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; All participant counts reported in Interim Progress Reports will be supported by retained underlying source documentation that directly reconcile to the reported totals. Standard documentation expectations and retention requirements will be communicated to program staff. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance will be measured through pre-submission review of reported participant data against underlying records and through post-submission spot checks conducted by Program Director. Documentation supporting reported counts will be retained in the official project file and made available for future audit, management review, and internal monitoring. Evidence of reconciliation will be documented via checklists or certifications retained with the report. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Program Director WNC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Sponsors have determined grant practices and required reporting documentation, which have not been consistently required or expected of subrecipients. WNC will maintain its own sign-in sheets and documentation for all grant-sponsored activities to ensure compliance with overall grant requirements. The corrective action was implemented in July 2025. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. The GEAR Up coordinator will create and maintain sign-in sheets or other documentation for every grant-sponsored activity. The coordinator will maintain records in accordance with federal and state guidance and will ensure that supporting documentation is sufficient to support the reported figures. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Final responsibility and accountability fall on the GEAR Up coordinator and grant administrator. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Cash Management Responses WNC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Western Nevada College implemented the practice of invoice review (proper segregation of duties) in October 2024, in which all invoices are reviewed from an individual separate from the preparer. This practice has been in place since our October 2024 grant billing period and has continued ever since. This audit finding resulted from the auditor selecting a transaction prior to WNC implementing the new procedure. All other transactions selected by the auditor were in compliance. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. All grant invoices going forward will have a second level of review prior to drawing down or requesting reimbursement of funds. Documentation will be compiled for each grant invoice that will indicate that a second level of review has been obtained. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The Vice President of Finance & Administration may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Reporting Responses UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; The UNLV OSP will continue to work with PIs to ensure there is a documented review of progress reports. PIs will be expected to demonstrate review of progress reports and provide supporting documentation for data. Additionally, if reports require financial expenditures, OSP will require validation before submission. Communication dissemination will occur twice within the academic year. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. UNLV OSP will maintain communications with PIs to perform monitoring throughout the life of the award. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility along with the applicable Deans. UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Management staff, independent of preparer, will review and sign off on each report. This review process will include verifying that all information is correctly entered. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance and performance will be measured through the independent review process, where management will verify and sign off on each report to ensure accuracy. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Post Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Reporting Responses UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Management Staff, independent of preparer, will review each subaward report required. The review process will include verifying that all subaward information required by FFATA is correctly entered. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance and performance will be measured through the independent review process, where management will verify the information in each report is accurate. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Pre Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Subrecipient Monitoring Responses UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; UNLV OSP has implemented a comprehensive policies and procedures document covering the entire subrecipient lifecycle, which includes internal controls such as a checklist, review of risk before issuance, a biannual sub monitoring review of financial audit, and authorized purposes review. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. The internal controls within the annual audit review process will require a response and escalation, as needed, for multiple follow-ups to enhance sub monitoring. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Reporting Responses TMCC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Two additional layers of review have been added to ensure that every RFR/Invoice is reviewed. On 4/14/25 an extra invoice review was added to Workday ensuring that they have to go through a review by someone other than the creator. During this step, the attachments including RFR and the approval email by the controller is also reviewed for accuracy. The Grant Accountant also established a log in August of 2025 that includes the Due Date, Date sent to the Controller for Approval, the Approval date and the submission date. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Emails documenting the review of the RFRs are kept as proof of review and saved in our files as well as Workday. The tracking document will also be made available for future review. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The Grant Accountants will be responsible for ensuring that we are in compliance with the corrective actions UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; UNLV OSP does have separation of duties from the originator of the subaward to the review of the subaward agreement in entering all of the data points into Sam.gov for FFATA reporting; however, UNLV OSP will create a process document that explicitly notes this for future documentation. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Cross checking of the issued subaward (originator) is reviewed and entered into the federal portal by the submitter. As the federal portal requires one party to enter and submit, OSP management perceives this to be very low risk but will ensure reviews occur. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. WNC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Western Nevada College implemented the practice of invoice review (proper segregation of duties) in October 2024, in which all invoices are reviewed from an individual separate from the preparer. This practice has been in place since our October 2024 grant billing period and has continued ever since. This audit finding resulted from the auditor selecting a transaction prior to WNC implementing the new procedure. All other transactions selected by the auditor were in compliance. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. All grant invoices going forward will have a second level of review prior to drawing down or requesting reimbursement of funds. Documentation will be compiled for each grant invoice that will indicate that a second level of review has been obtained. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The Vice President of Finance & Administration may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Subrecipient Monitoring Responses DRI – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; o DRI implemented controls to require the documentation of risk assessment procedures for all subawards issued beginning in November 2024. Depending on the results of the risk assessment, monitoring procedures are designed to ensure compliance. o DRI will review all subawards issued in prior years that are still active. For any that may be missing required information, communication will be sent to the subrecipient by March 31, 2026. o DRI will ensure future monitoring activities are adequately documented. Currently, procedures do require those knowledgeable of subaward activities to review and approve subaward invoices. Procedures will be updated beginning in February 2026 to include an intermittent review of supporting documentation for invoices received based on the subrecipient’s level of risk. o DRI will update procedures to ensure subrecipient audit reports are collected timely beginning in February 2026. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Documentation will be maintained in DRI’s pre-award system or in the accounting system, as appropriate, to ensure compliance. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The Chief Financial Officer may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. NSU – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Nevada State University (NSU) has implemented procedures and staff training to ensure that a risk assessment tool/checklist is completed prior to issuance of a subaward. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. NSU will conduct a risk assessment using a checklist prior to issuing a subaward. NSU will request and review prospective subrecipients’ annual financial statements and audit reports and will verify suspension and debarment status. Based on the results of this review, NSU will adjust subrecipient monitoring as appropriate. All risk assessments, reviews, and monitoring activities will be documented and maintained in the subrecipient files and in Workday. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The Director of Grants Award Services will be responsible with additional oversight by the Associate Vice President of Fiscal Services. UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; UNLV OSP has implemented a comprehensive policies and procedures document, in place as of July 2025, covering the entire subrecipient lifecycle and includes internal controls such as a checklist, review of risk before issuance, a biannual sub monitoring review of financial audit, and Authorized purposes review. Additional reviews of the policy and procedures are conducted throughout the fiscal year to ensure the related practices are relevant and effective, with adjustments made as necessary. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Per the UNLV OSP policy, documentation is required throughout the lifecycle and will be used for future audits. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; All required subaward documents will be retained in a centralized database for easy access and compliance tracking. Subaward Specialist will review subrecipient audit reports timely to ensure a management decision letter will be issued within six months of the clearinghouse acceptance date if required. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Once subrecipient letters of certification have been issued, management will perform a monthly reconciliation to ensure completeness and timely follow-up. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Pre Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund – Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance, Qualified Opinion Context: The School Corporation did not obtain the weekly payroll reports certifications from a company that performed renovations to replace HVAC equipment and install windows in the building. Therefore, no review was performed to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. The amount disbursed and reported on the SEFA during the audit period is $696,118 and the labor portion was not determinable by the School Corporation. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Nathaniel Day Contact Phone Number: 317-462-4434 . Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We will comply with Bacon Davis on future projects using federal funds.

Bienestar (Wellbeing) For All; ESNMS: Title V DOE Grant (Ensuring Success for the New Majority Student) – Assistance Listing No. 84.031S Recommendation: We recommend the University document and implement policies and procedures that are aligned with Uniform Grant Guidance for suspension and debarment to ensure the University is following requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The University implemented a formal policy and procedure to verify that a vendor is not debarred or suspended in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. The procedure, effective May 2025, outlines roles, responsibilities, and documentation requirements to ensure consistent compliance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Diane DiStaulo, Director of Accounting Operations, (201) 761-7415 Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Completed