Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,644
In database
Filtered Results
23,815
Matching current filters
Showing Page
233 of 953
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Finding 2024-012 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Eligibility Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-009 Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan: Condition #1 Response MOHS ...
Finding 2024-012 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Eligibility Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-009 Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan: Condition #1 Response MOHS acknowledges that 1 of 60 files did not have evidence of the case manager’s review of the file for eligibility requirements. Corrective Action: The HAP Housing Contract Specialist will conduct an annual review of the client eligibility documentation to ensure that all eligibility documentation is maintained in the client’s file. Condition #2 Response MOHS acknowledges that 1 out of 60 selections did not contain the rent calculation worksheet. Corrective Action: MOHS collects client income at intake and annually to determine eligibility and the tenant’s rent portion. The rent calculation worksheet ensures that the tenant’s rent portion does not exceed 30% of the client’s income. This rent calculation worksheet and income verification is maintained in the client’s file. Condition #3 Response MOHS acknowledges the 1 out of 60 selections did not have evidence of property inspection. Corrective Action: MOHS requires that all housing units under the program be inspected prior to the client’s lease up and annually. We will ensure that units assisted under the program are inspected annually and the passed inspection is maintained in the client’s file. Condition #4 Response MOHS acknowledges that 1 out of 60 selections did not have the supporting third-party documentation of income. Corrective Action: MOHS policy requires that clients are required to submit third party verification of income, assets, and medical expenses at program entry and annual recertification to ensure proper calculation of tenant rent. Contact Person: Lakeysha Williams, Director of Programs, Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services Completion Date: April 7, 2025
Finding 2024-010 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.239 Home Investment Partnership Program Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Special Tests – Housing Quality Standards Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-026 Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan: The A...
Finding 2024-010 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.239 Home Investment Partnership Program Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Special Tests – Housing Quality Standards Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-026 Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan: The Agency continues to appreciate the comprehensive review of this program and concurs with this finding. Of the two selections that lacked evidence of follow up inspection, one of the cited properties did not receive a follow up inspection in the program year, due in part to the transition of the property management staff. The exit and arrival of new property management company led to high staff turnover at the property. These follow up inspections will take place this year. Follow up inspections at another property did take place, but the results of at least one unit still required corrective measures. The results were shared with property staff at the time of inspection, but file documentation was not updated in a manner consistent with our corrective action plan. The 2025 inspections of that property have already begun with more scheduled. For the three selections that we were unable to provide support for verification of inspection for fiscal year 2024, these inspections took place after the fiscal year ended. HOME program compliance inspections are scheduled by calendar year, not fiscal year, so it is possible for annually inspected properties to not have an inspection during a fiscal year. The audit process has made us aware that we were not properly updating rescheduled inspections, inadvertently giving the impression that these inspections took place on their originally scheduled dates. While the outcome of the audit is not ideal, the corrective action plan from last year did go into effect and progress has been made. A new compliance officer was hired to take over the physical inspection portion of HOME compliance. The dedicated employee was able organize and update the physical inspection documentation into our SharePoint file. Several follow up inspections have already taken place. Going forward, we will redouble our efforts to make sure that Inspection Findings and Corrective measures are recorded and followed up making it a point of emphasis at weekly compliance meetings. We will also update our internal tracker so that rescheduled and follow up inspections are reflected accurately. Contact Person: Eugene Greene, Operations Officer, Baltimore City DHCD – Development Division Completion Date: Effective immediately.
Finding 2024-009 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.239 Home Investment Partnership Program Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Eligibility Repeat Finding: No Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan: The agency concurs with and accepts these find...
Finding 2024-009 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.239 Home Investment Partnership Program Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Eligibility Repeat Finding: No Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan: The agency concurs with and accepts these findings. Our grantees are aware of HOME record keeping requirements and are reminded of these requirements annually in the text of our file inspection compliance notifications. The management of the cited properties will be given a formal letter making them aware of the findings of this audit and reminded of HOME Investment Partnership Program record keeping requirements. We will also add the record keeping reminder to our Annual Desk Review notification. We will ensure that 100% of active HOME properties receive the record keeping requirements reminder, not just properties that receive file inspections. Additionally, the one file missing support documentation will be selected as a part of that property’s annual file inspection in 2025. We will also instruct the property that failed to submit its requested tenant file to continue searching for the file. The file in question is for a former tenant and was maintained by the previous management company. DHCD will reach out to the former management company to see if they can assist in the search. Contact Person: Eugene Greene, Operations Officer, Baltimore City DHCD – Development Division Completion Date: Effective immediately.
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan: The city’s legacy financial system did not collect data required for SEFA. Agencies had to provide most details manually a...
Finding 2024-007 Programs: All Material Weakness over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan: The city’s legacy financial system did not collect data required for SEFA. Agencies had to provide most details manually and work between spreadsheets and multiple systems to input and track receipt grant awards and spend on personnel, supplies and services and sub-recipient awards related to grants. The steps to address this legacy finding have been phased and include the technology implementation, staff training and additional oversight. As noted, the City implemented Workday, an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, across workstreams so that Financial Accounting, Grants, Procurement, Supplier Accounts, Banking, Payroll and Human Resources are all in one system. As with any ERP, an ongoing process of evaluation and updates are needed to continuously align workflow and business processes. This approach has led to continued improvement over the years as the grants management module is fully implemented in Workday. Since implementation, additional enhancements have been adopted and utilized with a robust workflow process for grant approval, grant budget tracking, and invoice scheduling. In addition to the technology adoption, an increase in citywide grants training and oversight has been implemented. The progress is detailed below: • FY 23 represented the first year in the new system. To compile the SEFA, the City used a hybrid approach to leverage Workday and Agency provided data. o There were some data accuracy challenges from data entry errors. To address those data entry challenges the award modification business process was improved post-implementation to add a GMO review and approval step of award modifications. o As of May 2024, all award modifications now require centralized GMO review to verify data accuracy. o Additional process changes in FY 23 included implementation of the requirement as part of the FY 24 budget preparation process that grant worktags must be created and budgeted for during the City’s annual budget process. The grant worktag creation process includes approvals at the agency program and fiscal levels, as well as at the Department of Finance level. • In FY24 further Award Module enhancements were adopted to provide key new data points in Workday. o Each grant award now includes information: Federal Assistance Listing Number (fna CFDA#), Passthrough Agencies & Passthrough Identifier. DRAFT CITY OF BALTIMORE Corrective Action Plans Year Ended June 30, 2024 146 Finding 2024-007 (continued) Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan: (continued) o Additionally, in FY 24, GMO, in collaboration with BAPS launched the Grants Workstream Training sessions. These monthly citywide virtual live trainings are on a variety of grant management related topics, averaging 60 attendees per session. Attendees are city agency grant managers and city agency fiscal staff. • In FY 24 and FY 25 the topics covered included: o FY 24 Grant Work tag Preparation o FY 24 SEFA Preparation o Grant Accounting Best Practices and Workday Billing o Award Set-up Best Practice & Potential Pitfalls o Extra Features in Workday (including reporting and how to set up award tasks and deadlines) o Subrecipient Monitoring Best Practices o Cost-reimbursable grant invoicing in Workday o FY 25 SEFA preparation o FY 26 Grant Work tag Preparation o Grant Management Roles and Responsibilities o Specific training on the SEFA, including information on understanding the importance of the SEFA, what information is included and how to review SEFA data, was conducted. Citywide training sessions were held in FY 24 and FY 25 to ensure that the reporting is understood by city agencies, with special emphasis on subrecipient payments being reported properly. The training schedule is ongoing and continuous. • To improve SEFA reporting data, in FY 25 there is an emphasis on subrecipient set up and spending to ensure that functionality is refined to improve uniformity in subrecipient set up. GMO, in conjunction with BAPS, the Bureau of Procurement and city agencies will work to refine subrecipient set up, spending and monitoring, including improved reporting. o GMO has hosted three subrecipient monitoring and management–related trainings since December 2024. Additionally, to improve subrecipient managing and monitoring, GMO modified the award setup business process in Workday to include verification of subaward status before final award setup approval. In FY 25, GMO provided training on how to setup subawards accurately in Workday. As discussed above, these trainings will be ongoing. • Additionally, GMO and the BBMR will collaborate on a subaward dashboard to monitor subrecipient spending data in real time. Contact Person: Michael Moiseyev, Chief Financial Officer, Baltimore City Completion Date: FY26 3rd Quarter- • Design and complete a grants management dashboard within Workday • Ongoing and continuous - GMO will continue to conduct trainings on SEFA reporting and subrecipient management and reporting.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Mississippi County Public Facilities Board has several findings in their past years audit. These findings were under the past administration that was let go on June 30th 2024. We were contacted by the board and took over on September...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Mississippi County Public Facilities Board has several findings in their past years audit. These findings were under the past administration that was let go on June 30th 2024. We were contacted by the board and took over on September 1st 2024 for a management contract. These findings will be corrected by the executive team that is managing the housing authority. We plan to have everything corrected and in place by July 1st 2026. This staff will follow all rules and regulations in the future and will bring everything up to date. Wixson Huffstetler, Executive Director 5/6/2025
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Mississippi County Public Facilities Board has several findings in their past years audit. These findings were under the past administration that was let go on June 30th 2024. We were contacted by the board and took over on September...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Mississippi County Public Facilities Board has several findings in their past years audit. These findings were under the past administration that was let go on June 30th 2024. We were contacted by the board and took over on September 1st 2024 for a management contract. These findings will be corrected by the executive team that is managing the housing authority. We plan to have everything corrected and in place by July 1st 2026. This staff will follow all rules and regulations in the future and will bring everything up to date. Wixson Huffstetler, Executive Director 5/6/2025
Caspian Housing Corporation respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2024. Auditor: Maner Costerisan, PC, 2425 E. Grand River Ave., Suite 1, Lansing, MI 48912 Audit period: Year ended December 31, 2024 The findings from December 31, 2024 schedule o...
Caspian Housing Corporation respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2024. Auditor: Maner Costerisan, PC, 2425 E. Grand River Ave., Suite 1, Lansing, MI 48912 Audit period: Year ended December 31, 2024 The findings from December 31, 2024 schedule of finding and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. Finding Number 2024-001 - Material Weakness in Interal Control Over Major Program Complaince Recommendation: Develop and implement comprehensive written policies and procedures that align with Uniform Guidance requirements. Action Taken: We are in agreement with the recommendations and will work to implement the required policies and procedures in accordance with Uniform Guidance during 2025.
The District will terminate the auditor and engage a qualified, Illinois-licensed firm.
The District will terminate the auditor and engage a qualified, Illinois-licensed firm.
The Institution acknowledges the finding regarding the late submission of the No Cost Extension (NCE) for HEERF Student Aid funds, which resulted in the ED not approving the extension and subsequently categorizing the $41,146 in distributions to 13 students as unallowed activities. The delay in sub...
The Institution acknowledges the finding regarding the late submission of the No Cost Extension (NCE) for HEERF Student Aid funds, which resulted in the ED not approving the extension and subsequently categorizing the $41,146 in distributions to 13 students as unallowed activities. The delay in submitting the NCE request was due to limited guidance and a lack of awareness regarding the June 30, 2023, filing deadline. The Institution relied heavily on the Program Management Analyst for HEERF-related guidance, and amid the evolving nature of HEERF regulations, the deadline was not effectively communicated or acted upon in time. We accept responsibility for this oversight and are committed to ensuring full compliance with all future grant-related requirements. 1. Coordination with ED for Resolution & Fund Return Process: The Institution will proactively engage with the U.S. Department of Education (ED) to determine the proper process for returning the $41,146 in overdistributed HEERF Student Aid funds. We will promptly comply with any official request from ED regarding the return of funds, ensuring timely resolution of this issue. A designated financial aid compliance officer will oversee communication with ED to track all requirements and submission deadlines. 2. Strengthening Grant Compliance Procedures: A compliance checklist will be introduced for all future grant performance period extensions to ensure deadlines are met well in advance. The Institution will implement a Grant Compliance Tracking System to monitor: a. Key deadlines for grant extensions, reporting, and compliance filings. b. Required actions for all active federal grant awards to ensure timely submissions. 3. Enhanced Staff Training & Internal Oversight: The Institution will provide training to financial aid and grant management staff on: a. Federal grant regulations and performance period compliance. b. How to track and process NCE filings in a timely manner. c. Best practices for engaging with ED to ensure compliance and funding oversight. Staff will also undergo annual refresher training on Title IV and HEERF grant compliance. 4. Improved External Communication & Regulatory Monitoring a. The Institution will establish direct communication channels with ED representatives and external regulatory advisors to ensure awareness of any changes in grant policies, extensions, and reporting requirements. b. Monthly compliance review meetings will be held internally to verify that all federal grant deadlines are on track. By implementing these corrective actions, the Institution is confident that future federal grant extensions and reporting requirements will be met on time, ensuring continued compliance with all federal funding regulations. We appreciate the recommendations provided and are committed to maintaining strong financial oversight and accountability. Personnel Responsible for Implementation: Danielle Skinner Position of Responsible Personnel: President Expected Date of Implementation: Immediate
View Audit 357766 Questioned Costs: $1
To ensure full compliance with Title IV R2T4 requirements, the Institution is implementing the following corrective actions: 1. Process Improvements for Accurate R2T4 Calculations  The Institution will implement a dual-verification review process to ensure all R2T4 calculations are accurate before ...
To ensure full compliance with Title IV R2T4 requirements, the Institution is implementing the following corrective actions: 1. Process Improvements for Accurate R2T4 Calculations  The Institution will implement a dual-verification review process to ensure all R2T4 calculations are accurate before funds are returned.  A dedicated compliance review team member will oversee the manual entry of student withdrawal dates and enrollment period calculations to prevent miscalculations.  The Institution will utilize automated tools within Jenzabar Financial Aid (our Student Management System) to improve accuracy in calculating earned vs. unearned Title IV aid.  A preliminary audit of student accounts will be conducted before R2T4 calculations are finalized to catch errors before submission. 2. Strengthening Internal Controls & Timely Fund Returns  A tracking system will be implemented to flag all students requiring R2T4 processing, ensuring that returns are initiated and completed within the required 45-day period.  The Institution will conduct weekly internal reconciliation reviews of withdrawal records to verify compliance with notification and return due date requirements.  The financial aid office and student accounts team will coordinate weekly reconciliation meetings to monitor all outstanding Title IV returns. 3. Enhanced Staff Training on R2T4 Compliance  Specialized training will be provided to financial aid personnel on: a) Accurate calculation methodologies for R2T4, including proper determination of payment period percentage completion. b) Compliance with 34 CFR 668.22 and 668.173(b) regarding timely notification and return of unearned funds. c) Utilizing internal checklists and reconciliation tools to prevent future miscalculations or delays.  Staff will undergo mandatory annual compliance refresher training to stay current with federal regulations and best practices. 4. Strengthening Documentation & Compliance Monitoring  The Institution will implement a comprehensive R2T4 compliance checklist to ensure: a) All Title IV returns are properly calculated and reviewed. b) The correct withdrawal dates and enrollment period lengths are recorded. c) All funds are returned within the regulatory 45-day window.  A quarterly audit of all R2T4 transactions will be conducted by a designated compliance officer to assess and report on adherence to federal requirements. Personnel Responsible for Implementation: Danielle Skinner Position of Responsible Personnel: President Expected Date of Implementation: Immediate
View Audit 357766 Questioned Costs: $1
View of Responsible Official After reviewing the recommendation from Hamilton & Musser, the Association agrees that the Executive Director will carefully review and sign off on time sheets for each employee during every pay period to confirm the review. This has and will continue to be the custom an...
View of Responsible Official After reviewing the recommendation from Hamilton & Musser, the Association agrees that the Executive Director will carefully review and sign off on time sheets for each employee during every pay period to confirm the review. This has and will continue to be the custom and practice of the Association.
Condition: During testing, it was noted that although there was a process in place to review eligibility criteria received by program, there was not an independent review or control to ensure eligibility was accurate. Planned Corrective Action: After the initial review for eligibility, a second empl...
Condition: During testing, it was noted that although there was a process in place to review eligibility criteria received by program, there was not an independent review or control to ensure eligibility was accurate. Planned Corrective Action: After the initial review for eligibility, a second employee will verify that eligibility was properly determined and provide a signoff to document review. This was implemented in September of 2024. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Lucy Rosenberg and Michelle Estell Anticipated Completion Date: 09/01/2024
The District has instituted an internal control to ensure employee payroll coding is reviewed year-to-year as program changes are made.
The District has instituted an internal control to ensure employee payroll coding is reviewed year-to-year as program changes are made.
View Audit 357724 Questioned Costs: $1
Condition: The Township did not have controls in place surrounding the review of annual performance reporting. Planned Corrective Action: The Township has implemented a formal review process within the Finance and Budget Department to ensure the integrity of annual performance reporting. One staff m...
Condition: The Township did not have controls in place surrounding the review of annual performance reporting. Planned Corrective Action: The Township has implemented a formal review process within the Finance and Budget Department to ensure the integrity of annual performance reporting. One staff member has been designated to compile and complete the performance reports,while a separate finance team member is responsible for conducting an independent review prior to submission. To support this process, an internal timeline has been established to allow sufficient time for thorough review and validation of all performance data before final submission. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Wendy Hillman Anticipated Completion Date: 04/15/2025
Cochise County WIC leadership and staff is committed to full adherence with WIC policy and will continue to implement training, monitoring, and communication to ensure compliance with federal and state regulation. The County immediately corrected this issue by conducting a mandatory training sessio...
Cochise County WIC leadership and staff is committed to full adherence with WIC policy and will continue to implement training, monitoring, and communication to ensure compliance with federal and state regulation. The County immediately corrected this issue by conducting a mandatory training session for all WIC staff regarding the Rights and Obligations policy. During this session, the policy was read aloud and distributed in written form to all attendees. Staff were directed to inform all participants of their rights and responsibilities to include having the rights and responsibilities form signed by the participants, prior to issuing benefits, during the participant’s initial certification, and recertifications for ongoing benefits. Staff received the Rights and Obligations Pledge for review and reference. Procedures for obtaining signatures from participants not physically present in the office were reviewed. Acceptable alternatives include sending the form via email for electronic or physical signature, scheduling a follow-up in-office visit for signature collection. All staff questions were addressed to ensure clarity and consistent understanding. Ongoing reminders have been disseminated through emails and during regular staff “huddles” since the training. In addition to the immediate actions taken to correct the finding, the County also implemented long-term action steps. These steps include annual training of all WIC Staff on the Rights and Obligations policy the 2nd Monday of January. Each employee will sign an attestation confirming their understanding and compliance post-training. This attestation will be stored in the employee’s personnel record. Monthly, the WIC Manager, or designee, will review the WIC Cert. for Audit Report the last Friday of each month to identify and address any instances of missing client signatures. Additionally, the WIC Manager will manually audit 3% of the total WIC members for the month. Continuous actions implemented by County staff to correct this finding includes consistent reinforcement of signature collection protocols and policy reminders during monthly meetings and weekly “huddles”. Of note, a request was submitted to the Arizona WIC Service Desk to determine whether a report could be generated identifying all participants lacking a signed Rights and Obligations form to strengthen monitoring efforts. The response received indicated that generating this type of report is extremely complex, and at this time it is not possible.
View Audit 357695 Questioned Costs: $1
Corrective Action Plan for Annual Audit 2024 Finding One: 2024-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Auditor’s Recommendations: Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce should conduct research and keep records for procurements not secured using a competitive process. Corrective Action: TPCC S...
Corrective Action Plan for Annual Audit 2024 Finding One: 2024-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Auditor’s Recommendations: Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce should conduct research and keep records for procurements not secured using a competitive process. Corrective Action: TPCC Staff will continue to use a competitive procurement process for vendors when possible, per TPCC procurement policy. CEO, Andrea Reay, will amend the current procurement policy to include a process for when competitive procurement is not possible due to unique needs/benefits. This will include a process documenting research conducted that demonstrates the unique benefits to the program/participants for any vendor that is not secured using a competitive process. Documentation includes dates discussed, names of individuals involved in the discussion and decisions made. The debarment check with sam.gov will be included in the documentation packet. Timing of remediation completion: CEO, Andrea Reay, will complete by May 31, 2025.
View Audit 357681 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 562061 (2024-002)
Significant Deficiency 2024
University awarded Subsidized Federal Direct Loans to one student in excess of their Subsidized Federal Direct Loan eligibility, and therefore did not comply with all requirements associated with excess loan proceeds. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: This finding is considered an isolated occurr...
University awarded Subsidized Federal Direct Loans to one student in excess of their Subsidized Federal Direct Loan eligibility, and therefore did not comply with all requirements associated with excess loan proceeds. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: This finding is considered an isolated occurrence and is not indicative of Roosevelt University’s standard administrative practices or institutional policies. The University has taken the following corrective actions to address the issue and prevent recurrence Student Account Adjustment: A reallocation of $2,900 from the Federal Direct Subsidized Loan to the Federal Direct Unsubsidized Loan was completed to correct the student’s account. All necessary updates were submitted to the U.S. Department of Education on May 16, 2025. Root Cause Analysis and System Improvements: The University will conduct a thorough root cause analysis to determine the underlying factors that led to the overaward. This analysis will be completed within 30 days. Preventative Measure and On-going Monitoring: Based upon the outcome of the root cause analysis, Roosevelt will implement appropriate system controls and develop an on-going monitoring plan to prevent similar issues in the future. These preventative measures will be established within 45 days. Roosevelt University remains committed to maintaining compliance with federal regulations and to continuously strengthening its internal controls to ensure accurate administration of Title IV funds. Anticipated Completion Date: July 15, 2025 Contact Person: Michelle Hayes, Senior Director, Financial Aid and Compliance // Michelle Stipp, Associate Vice President, Enrollment Management
View Audit 357660 Questioned Costs: $1
Verification status code within the Common Origination and Disbursement System Cluster: Student Financial Assistance Sponsoring Agency: Department of Education Award Name: Pell Grant Program Award Number: Various Assistance Listing Title: Federal Pell Grant Program Assistance Listing Number: 84.033 ...
Verification status code within the Common Origination and Disbursement System Cluster: Student Financial Assistance Sponsoring Agency: Department of Education Award Name: Pell Grant Program Award Number: Various Assistance Listing Title: Federal Pell Grant Program Assistance Listing Number: 84.033 Award Year: 2023-2024 Pass-through entity: Not applicable Stanford agrees with this finding and will take steps to prevent these types of errors from happening in the future. Specifically regarding the case of the applicant for whom verification was not completed until after federal aid funds had been disbursed, the Director of Compliance and Technology in the Central Financial Aid Office has adjusted the existing report of verification selections to include students from the three professional schools, as of January 01, 2025, and will work closely with the financial aid offices of each professional school to ensure that selected applicants are verified prior to disbursement of federal aid funds. This communication will be ongoing and occur quarterly at a minimum. Regarding the issue of verification status codes not being updated correctly, the Central Financial Aid office has made two enhancements to our procedures in an effort to avoid future errors: • First, the Director of Compliance and Technology will emphasize to aid application reviewers the importance of correctly setting the verification field values in the PeopleSoft system as part of annual training, which occurs at the beginning of each academic year cycle typically in November, and when new team members arrive. The status of these values will be monitored throughout the year using a database query beginning May 01, 2025 and ongoing on a monthly basis. • Second, the Assistant Director of Technology will regularly request and review a report from the federal Common Origination & Disbursement (COD) system that shows the verification status codes for all selected applicants, to ensure that the codes in the COD system accurately reflect the verification status of aid recipients on a monthly basis beginning on May 01, 2025. We will also double-check the values in all COD records as part of the year-end reconciliation process at the end of each award year, typically in September.Verification status code within the Common Origination and Disbursement System Cluster: Student Financial Assistance Sponsoring Agency: Department of Education Award Name: Pell Grant Program Award Number: Various Assistance Listing Title: Federal Pell Grant Program Assistance Listing Number: 84.033 Award Year: 2023-2024 Pass-through entity: Not applicable Stanford agrees with this finding and will take steps to prevent these types of errors from happening in the future. Specifically regarding the case of the applicant for whom verification was not completed until after federal aid funds had been disbursed, the Director of Compliance and Technology in the Central Financial Aid Office has adjusted the existing report of verification selections to include students from the three professional schools, as of January 01, 2025, and will work closely with the financial aid offices of each professional school to ensure that selected applicants are verified prior to disbursement of federal aid funds. This communication will be ongoing and occur quarterly at a minimum. Regarding the issue of verification status codes not being updated correctly, the Central Financial Aid office has made two enhancements to our procedures in an effort to avoid future errors: • First, the Director of Compliance and Technology will emphasize to aid application reviewers the importance of correctly setting the verification field values in the PeopleSoft system as part of annual training, which occurs at the beginning of each academic year cycle typically in November, and when new team members arrive. The status of these values will be monitored throughout the year using a database query beginning May 01, 2025 and ongoing on a monthly basis. • Second, the Assistant Director of Technology will regularly request and review a report from the federal Common Origination & Disbursement (COD) system that shows the verification status codes for all selected applicants, to ensure that the codes in the COD system accurately reflect the verification status of aid recipients on a monthly basis beginning on May 01, 2025. We will also double-check the values in all COD records as part of the year-end reconciliation process at the end of each award year, typically in September.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of Entity: High Valley Manor Apartments Audit Firm: SVA Certified Public Accountants, S.C. Audit Period: Year ended December 31, 2024 Corrective Action Plan Prepared by: Name: Dawn Melgares Position: Executive Director of San Luis Valley Housing Coalition, Inc. Tele...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of Entity: High Valley Manor Apartments Audit Firm: SVA Certified Public Accountants, S.C. Audit Period: Year ended December 31, 2024 Corrective Action Plan Prepared by: Name: Dawn Melgares Position: Executive Director of San Luis Valley Housing Coalition, Inc. Telephone Number: 719-587-9807 1. 2024-001 Finding – Internal control over financial reporting a. Comments on findings and recommendations There is a lack of controls over financial reporting to ensure material misstatements are detected and corrected in a timely manner and the project relies on its auditors to assist in the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. b. Actions taken or planned i. Management agent to review processes to ensure transactions are recorded in proper accounts. ii. Management agent will review all audit adjustments and create processes to perform annual account reconciliation of year end balances agree to supporting schedules. c. Anticipated completion date July 31, 2025
Aging Cluster – Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B – Assistance Listing No. 93.044 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement a control process to ensure that it meets its matching requirements within the grant period. Explanation of Disagreement With Audit Finding...
Aging Cluster – Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B – Assistance Listing No. 93.044 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement a control process to ensure that it meets its matching requirements within the grant period. Explanation of Disagreement With Audit Finding: Management does not agree with this finding. LSC program letter 22-5 emphasizes the importance of reconciliations of timekeeping reports with labor costs, distribution report or alternative reports. CLS prioritizes this practice of reconciliation and used it during the last months of 2024 to improve internal controls and minimize potential errors. We do not believe that CLA fully and fairly considered CLS’s thorough and complete reconciliation. A “material weakness” is defined as a deficiency “such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis.” Given that reconciliation is part of our internal control process used to prevent and detect/correct any errors, it should have been fully considered and is unfairly excluded from the review. For this reason, CLS considers that this is not a material weakness as the reconciliation caught and corrected these errors. Finally, the total amount of this finding is very low and should not rise to the level of material weakness. Action Taken in Response to Finding: The Organization is updating the segregation of duties in order to improve the preparation, review and sign steps of the process. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Silvia Zelaya, Finance Director Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Plan: January 2026
Aging Cluster – Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B – Assistance Listing No. 93.044 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its salaries and wages cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review of indi...
Aging Cluster – Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B – Assistance Listing No. 93.044 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its salaries and wages cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review of individual time records and expense data and maximize the use of automated allocations based on employees’ time and effort records, effective compensation during work periods, and that are calculated in a consistent manner. We also recommend that the Organization maintain contemporaneous documentation supporting all cost allocations. Explanation of Disagreement With Audit Finding: Management does not agree with this finding. LSC program letter 22-5 emphasizes the importance of reconciliations of timekeeping reports with labor costs, distribution report or alternative reports. CLS prioritizes this practice of reconciliation and used it during the last months of 2024 to improve internal controls and minimize potential errors. We do not believe that CLA fully and fairly considered CLS’s thorough and complete reconciliation. A “material weakness” is defined as a deficiency “such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis.” Given that reconciliation is part of our internal control process used to prevent and detect/correct any errors, it should have been fully considered and is unfairly excluded from the review. For this reason, CLS considers that this is not a material weakness as the reconciliation caught and corrected these errors. Finally, the total amount of this finding is very low and should not rise to the level of material weakness. Action Taken in Response to Finding: The Organization will review this finding and current methodology and propose corrections as part of a broader review of its technologies. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Silvia Zelaya, Finance Director Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Plan: January 2026
View Audit 357595 Questioned Costs: $1
Legal Services Corporation Grants – Assistance Listing No. 09.706060 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its salaries, wages, employee benefit, and general expense cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review ...
Legal Services Corporation Grants – Assistance Listing No. 09.706060 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its salaries, wages, employee benefit, and general expense cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review of individual time records and expense data and maximize the use of automated allocations based on employees’ time and effort records, effective compensation during work periods, and that are calculated in a consistent manner. We also recommend that the Organization maintain contemporaneous documentation supporting all cost allocations. Explanation of Disagreement With Audit Finding: Management partially agrees with this finding. CLS recognizes manual miscalculations due to human errors but considers that the allocation methodology is correct. CLS is undertaking improvements oriented toward automatization of the process while recognizing that complete automatization is not possible without an expensive and complete overhaul of our systems. Action Taken in Response to Finding: The Organization will review this finding and current methodology and propose corrections as part of a broader review of its technologies. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Silvia Zelaya, Finance Director Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Plan: January 2026
Legal Services Corporation Grants – Assistance Listing No. 09.706060 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review of individual time records and expense data and maximiz...
Legal Services Corporation Grants – Assistance Listing No. 09.706060 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review of individual time records and expense data and maximize the use of automated allocations that are calculated in a consistent manner that ensure costs are applied uniformly to respective benefited activities, and that are reflective on employees’ time and effort records Explanation of Disagreement With Audit Finding: Management partially agrees with this finding. First, 45 CFR Part 1635 codifies the timekeeping requirement. CLS keeps track of every case and time dedicated by staff in strict compliance with this requirement. Additionally, the distribution of expenses in the general fund, which includes LSC and two other funding sources, represents a fair method and allocation. Regarding the questioned costs, CLS disagrees with the finding of material weakness given the extremely low total dollar value. Action Taken in Response to Finding: The Organization will review this finding and current methodology and propose corrections as part of a broader review of its technologies. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Silvia Zelaya, Finance Director Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Plan: January 2026
View Audit 357595 Questioned Costs: $1
BVCASA agrees with the audit finding and is working to complete the final assessment of the unallowable payroll costs and reallocate the expenses to the appropriate programs. Management will self-report on the total impact of the finding to HHSC within 60 days of the date of the audit report. Addi...
BVCASA agrees with the audit finding and is working to complete the final assessment of the unallowable payroll costs and reallocate the expenses to the appropriate programs. Management will self-report on the total impact of the finding to HHSC within 60 days of the date of the audit report. Additionally, management will ensure internal controls are strengthened over payroll processing and adequate reconciliations are performed each pay period to verify that payroll costs are allocated appropriately.
View Audit 357589 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 561950 (2024-004)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Corrective Action Plan: The identified conditions relate to students who experienced a change in status code within the Union College system. This report will be reconciled with student status changes transmitted by the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to the National Student Loan Database Syste...
Corrective Action Plan: The identified conditions relate to students who experienced a change in status code within the Union College system. This report will be reconciled with student status changes transmitted by the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to the National Student Loan Database System (NSLDS), and any necessary corrections will be made immediately. Timeline for Implementation of Corrective Action Plan: These corrective actions are being implemented in Spring 2025.
« 1 231 232 234 235 953 »