Finding 44236 (2022-003)

Material Weakness
Requirement
AB
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-03-30
Audit: 48843
Auditor: Crowe LLP

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The School Corporation lacks an effective internal control system to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements, particularly regarding allowable activities and costs.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with 2 CFR 200.303 and related regulations, leading to potential mismanagement of federal funds.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a robust internal control framework for payroll and cost allocation, ensuring all costs are documented and compliant with federal guidelines.

Finding Text

FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster- Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Number(s) and Year(s)(or Other Identifying Numbers): Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." USDA Indirect Cost Guidance Memo SP 60-2016 "It is unallowable to bill the nonprofit school food service account (NSFSA) for indirect costs that were previously paid from the general fund unless an agreement exists to show that the district had been ?loaning? the NSFSA funds to cover the indirect costs in one or more prior years." 7 CFR 210.21(f)(1) states in part: ". . . (ii) (A) The contractor must separately identify for each cost submitted for payment to the school food authority the amount of that cost that is allowable (can be paid from the nonprofit school food service account) and the amount that is unallowable (cannot be paid from the nonprofit school food service account); or (B) The contractor must exclude all unallowable costs from its billing documents and certify that only allowable costs are submitted for payment and records have been established that maintain the visibility of unallowable costs, including directly associated costs in a manner suitable for contract cost determination and verification; (iii) The contractor's determination of its allowable costs must be made in compliance with the applicable Departmental and Program regulations and Office of Management and Budget cost circulars; . . . (vi) The contractor must maintain documentation of costs and discounts, rebates and other applicable credits, and must furnish such documentation upon request to the school food authority, the State agency, or the Department." Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-003 (Continued) 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: "Nonprofit school food service. School food authorities shall maintain a nonprofit school food service. Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-003 (Continued) Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims allocation reports in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have internal controls over indirect costs that would ensure they were properly paid. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $74,500 were identified. Context: The School Corporation was approved for an indirect cost rate for fiscal years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in order to allocate indirect costs to the School Corporation?s Cafeteria fund. However, the School Corporation did not charge these indirect costs in the appropriate time frame. On June 30, 2022 the School Corporation applied the indirect costs retroactively for the child nutrition cluster fiscal year's 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in the amounts of approximately $33,150 and $41,350, respectively from the Cafeteria Fund to the Operations Fund. For after the fact transfers, the School Corporation is required to enter into an inter-fund loan agreement and to document the Operation fund support of the School Lunch fund. The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs compliance requirements. There was no documented, formal review over the supporting payroll distribution report to support the amount charged and allocated for each employee. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls for the timing of indirect costs claims and transfers. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management understands the finding, has prepared an initial corrective action plan and will discuss resolution with Indiana Department of Education.

Corrective Action Plan

Respectfully, the school corporation does not agree with several of the findings in regards to segregation of duties and purchases. First, the SBOA auditors' told the school corporation during the 2019 audit that operating the school lunch program through the extracurricular account was not legal. The school corporation was informed that this account must be transferred to Central Office and a Corrective Action Plan must be in place. This directive was incorrect and pointed out in the official response from November 5, 2019 under IC 20-26-5-4(a)(l l). Second, segregation of duties, oversight, and approval of functions existed in 2019 and are presently occurring daily, weekly, and monthly within the cafeteria program under the corporation accounts and supervision of Central Office. Cafeteria workers record and submit timesheets of duties performed during each payroll period. The Cafeteria Director verifies and signs timesheets to be submitted to the Treasurer and Deputy Treasurer for review and payment from the Cafeteria account. A payroll docket report is sent to the Superintendent prior to payment from the bank. Prior to the 2019 audit, the High School Treasurer spent approximately two hours per day counting cash received each day from school lunches purchased. She also receipted those funds it into the software system, made deposits to the bank, paid invoices for food expenses, and processed part of payroll. Tasks conducted by the High School Treasurer were segregated by a timesheet and supervised by the High School Principal. All those tasks were shifted to Central Office in 2020 and are now segregated to the Treasurer and Deputy Treasurer. The Treasurer documents hours spent on Cafeteria accounts on a timesheet for review and signature by the Superintendent. Financial reports of expenditures and revenues are provided for review and oversight to the Superintendent and School Board at monthly board meetings. Third, RSSC has a small Central Office consisting of a Superintendent, Treasurer, Deputy Treasurer, and Secretary. It has no Assistant Superintendents, Human Resources Director, or Business Manager. Each person in Central Office wears multiple hats and performs multiple duties each day. It was noted in the Audit Report filed from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010 that " ...Randolph Southern School Corporation is unable, due to financial limitations, to employ additional personnel to segregate duties in our receipts and cash and investment balances. This statement would apply to all of our internal controls. " The circumstances for RSSC have not changed in the audit periods from July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2022. Corrective Action Plan: The School Board had chosen not to add additional staffing due to costs. RSSC is still unable to segregate duties for financial transactions and reporting. Fourth, the Cafeteria Program only has one full-time staff member, the Cafeteria Director. Eight part-time cafeteria workers prepare and feed up to 300 students each day. This food service program is one of the best run programs in the State oflndiana. It has not had one food preparation or sanitation violation from IDOE or Department of Health in the last 12 years. Fifth, the Cafeteria Program is economically efficient and fiscally responsible. The account carries at least a 3-month cash balance at all times. This success is a direct result of oversight by the combination of the Superintendent, Treasurer, and Cafeteria Director. RSSC adopted board policy 6114 Cost Principles-Spending Federal Funds on May 9, 2016. RSSC has had an Indirect Cost Rate in place since 2013. The adopted policy allows the school corporation to apply Indirect Costs to all federal funds including the Cafeteria account. On December 5, 2019, email communications between the Dr. Donnie Bowsman, Superintendent and Tina Herzog, IDOE Assistant Director of Operations and Food Distributions clearly state the school corporation can apply the Indirect Cost Rate to the Cafeteria account. The email communication clearly states that the high cash balance was a result of not applying the Indirect Cost Rate to the Cafeteria account (See Exhibit 1 Emails). The Indirect Rate was approved by the IDOE Office of School Finance and existed prior to the audit years being referenced in the finding. Technically, the prospective portion (going forward for the next school year) as referenced on pages 24-25 of USDA Indirect Cost Guidance Manual pertains to the 2013 Fiscal Year. Moreover, the fact was reiterated by the IDOE School Nutrition Office with email communications on December 5, 2019, not 2021 or 2022 as referenced in the finding. RSSC has not charged or recouped the Cafeteria Account the Indirect Cost rate for many years and has subsidized this account which should be independent and self-sufficient. The School Corporation did not apply the Indirect Cost Rate in 2020 or 2021 because we were not sure how many students would be eating and how fiscally sound the account would be due to students not attending school because of COVID. Corrective Action Plan: The Indirect Cost Rate will be applied and collected in the future prior to June 30 of each current fiscal year. It should also be noted that in 2021, RSSC purchased a new cafeteria dishwasher utilizing ESSER II funds. This unit was 20+ years old and needed to be replaced in order to continue feeding children and to run the food service program. This expense could have been and should have been a direct cost of $58,189 to the Cafeteria account. However, due to the unknown circumstances of COVID, the RSSC could not take a chance. The ESSER II grant is still open and we are now questioning whether this expense could be charged directly to the Cafeteria account. Those ESSER II fund could be utilized for staffing to support student learning loss and remediation. Sixth, COVID caused this financial account to increase exponentially from 2020 to 2021. ESSER funds were provided by the federal government to provide free lunches to every child which paid the food operations expenses for two school years. Student participation of eating school lunches increased during these time periods. Additionally, staff members were receiving hazard pay incentives on top of their regular hourly rate. Further, the School Corporation and Cafeteria Program took on the enormous task of feeding children over the summers of 2020 and 2021 when COVID cases were at its peak. The cafeteria personnel fed 5286 and 5740 students respectfully during those summers. The number of meals served during the summer almost equaled the total amount of meals served during the entire school year for each respective academic year. These additional meals created additional unexpected revenues for the fiscal year. The school corporation did not charge mileage for satellite lunches being delivered or indirect costs.

Categories

Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 44237 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 44238 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 44239 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 44240 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 44241 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 44242 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 44243 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 44244 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 44245 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 44246 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 44247 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 44248 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 47621 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 620678 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 620679 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 620680 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 620681 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 620682 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 620683 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 620684 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 620685 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 620686 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 620687 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 620688 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 620689 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 620690 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 624063 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $180,338
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $138,064
84.425 Covid-19 - Education Stabilization Fund $85,271
10.555 National School Lunch Program $60,003
84.358 Rural Education $35,865
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants $24,891
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $17,318
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $11,516
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $8,267