Audit 47688

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$3.36M
Findings
4
Programs
5
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-06-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
44077 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
44078 2022-002 Material Weakness - N
620519 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
620520 2022-002 Material Weakness - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $1.45M - 0
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $983,981 Yes 0
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $792,456 Yes 1
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $86,126 Yes 1
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $47,884 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
LQAHGBJ4UK27 William Myles Auditee
2294344500 Rich Larsen Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: BASIS OF PRESENTATIONThe accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal grant activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2022. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the net position, changes in net position or cash flows of the Authority. Therefore, some amounts presented in the Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of the financial statements.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESExpenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: INDIRECT COST RATEThe Authority has not elected to use the ten percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-002: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.871, 14.879 & 14.EHV Noncompliance a?? N. Special Tests and Provisions a?? Reasonable Rent Non-Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions - Mainstream Vouchers & Emergency Housing Vouchers must state the method used by the PHA to determine that the rent to owner is reasonable in comparison to rent for other comparable unassisted units. The PHA determination must consider unit attributes such as the location, quality, size, unit type, and age of the unit, and any amenities, housing services, maintenance, and utilities provided by the owner. The PHA must determine that the rent to owner is reasonable at the time of initial leasing. Also, the PHA must determine reasonable rent during the term of the contract (a) before any increase in the rent to owner, and (b) at the HAP contract anniversary if there is a 5 percent decrease in the published Fair Market Rent in effect 60 days before the HAP contract anniversary. The PHA must maintain records to document the basis for the determination that rent to owner is a reasonable rent (initially and during the term of the HAP contract) (24 CFR sections 982.4, 982.54(d)(15), 982.158(f)(7), and 982.507). Condition: Based upon inspection of the rent reasonableness documentation provided to us during the time of audit and discussions with management, it could not be determined with any certainty that rent to owner on newly leased units to the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, Mainstream Vouchers, and Emergency Housing Vouchers is reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy at initial leasing and during the term of the contract. Context: Four (4) units were selected from the new move-in list and the rent to those units were to be determined reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy at time of leasing and during the term of the contract. It was determined that rent to four (4) out of four (4) units selected could not be determined reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy. Known Questioned Costs: $22,822 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program and a material weakness in the Mainstream Vouchers and Emergency Housing Vouchers Programs in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to reasonable rent. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance and the Mainstream Vouchers and Emergency Housing Vouchers Programs are in material non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to reasonable rent. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: The Authority has recognized the deficiencies in the Housing Voucher Cluster Programs and will implement internal control procedures that will ensure compliance of federal regulations.
Finding 2022-002: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.871, 14.879 & 14.EHV Noncompliance a?? N. Special Tests and Provisions a?? Reasonable Rent Non-Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions - Mainstream Vouchers & Emergency Housing Vouchers must state the method used by the PHA to determine that the rent to owner is reasonable in comparison to rent for other comparable unassisted units. The PHA determination must consider unit attributes such as the location, quality, size, unit type, and age of the unit, and any amenities, housing services, maintenance, and utilities provided by the owner. The PHA must determine that the rent to owner is reasonable at the time of initial leasing. Also, the PHA must determine reasonable rent during the term of the contract (a) before any increase in the rent to owner, and (b) at the HAP contract anniversary if there is a 5 percent decrease in the published Fair Market Rent in effect 60 days before the HAP contract anniversary. The PHA must maintain records to document the basis for the determination that rent to owner is a reasonable rent (initially and during the term of the HAP contract) (24 CFR sections 982.4, 982.54(d)(15), 982.158(f)(7), and 982.507). Condition: Based upon inspection of the rent reasonableness documentation provided to us during the time of audit and discussions with management, it could not be determined with any certainty that rent to owner on newly leased units to the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, Mainstream Vouchers, and Emergency Housing Vouchers is reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy at initial leasing and during the term of the contract. Context: Four (4) units were selected from the new move-in list and the rent to those units were to be determined reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy at time of leasing and during the term of the contract. It was determined that rent to four (4) out of four (4) units selected could not be determined reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy. Known Questioned Costs: $22,822 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program and a material weakness in the Mainstream Vouchers and Emergency Housing Vouchers Programs in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to reasonable rent. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance and the Mainstream Vouchers and Emergency Housing Vouchers Programs are in material non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to reasonable rent. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: The Authority has recognized the deficiencies in the Housing Voucher Cluster Programs and will implement internal control procedures that will ensure compliance of federal regulations.
Finding 2022-002: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.871, 14.879 & 14.EHV Noncompliance a?? N. Special Tests and Provisions a?? Reasonable Rent Non-Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions - Mainstream Vouchers & Emergency Housing Vouchers must state the method used by the PHA to determine that the rent to owner is reasonable in comparison to rent for other comparable unassisted units. The PHA determination must consider unit attributes such as the location, quality, size, unit type, and age of the unit, and any amenities, housing services, maintenance, and utilities provided by the owner. The PHA must determine that the rent to owner is reasonable at the time of initial leasing. Also, the PHA must determine reasonable rent during the term of the contract (a) before any increase in the rent to owner, and (b) at the HAP contract anniversary if there is a 5 percent decrease in the published Fair Market Rent in effect 60 days before the HAP contract anniversary. The PHA must maintain records to document the basis for the determination that rent to owner is a reasonable rent (initially and during the term of the HAP contract) (24 CFR sections 982.4, 982.54(d)(15), 982.158(f)(7), and 982.507). Condition: Based upon inspection of the rent reasonableness documentation provided to us during the time of audit and discussions with management, it could not be determined with any certainty that rent to owner on newly leased units to the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, Mainstream Vouchers, and Emergency Housing Vouchers is reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy at initial leasing and during the term of the contract. Context: Four (4) units were selected from the new move-in list and the rent to those units were to be determined reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy at time of leasing and during the term of the contract. It was determined that rent to four (4) out of four (4) units selected could not be determined reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy. Known Questioned Costs: $22,822 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program and a material weakness in the Mainstream Vouchers and Emergency Housing Vouchers Programs in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to reasonable rent. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance and the Mainstream Vouchers and Emergency Housing Vouchers Programs are in material non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to reasonable rent. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: The Authority has recognized the deficiencies in the Housing Voucher Cluster Programs and will implement internal control procedures that will ensure compliance of federal regulations.
Finding 2022-002: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.871, 14.879 & 14.EHV Noncompliance a?? N. Special Tests and Provisions a?? Reasonable Rent Non-Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions - Mainstream Vouchers & Emergency Housing Vouchers must state the method used by the PHA to determine that the rent to owner is reasonable in comparison to rent for other comparable unassisted units. The PHA determination must consider unit attributes such as the location, quality, size, unit type, and age of the unit, and any amenities, housing services, maintenance, and utilities provided by the owner. The PHA must determine that the rent to owner is reasonable at the time of initial leasing. Also, the PHA must determine reasonable rent during the term of the contract (a) before any increase in the rent to owner, and (b) at the HAP contract anniversary if there is a 5 percent decrease in the published Fair Market Rent in effect 60 days before the HAP contract anniversary. The PHA must maintain records to document the basis for the determination that rent to owner is a reasonable rent (initially and during the term of the HAP contract) (24 CFR sections 982.4, 982.54(d)(15), 982.158(f)(7), and 982.507). Condition: Based upon inspection of the rent reasonableness documentation provided to us during the time of audit and discussions with management, it could not be determined with any certainty that rent to owner on newly leased units to the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, Mainstream Vouchers, and Emergency Housing Vouchers is reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy at initial leasing and during the term of the contract. Context: Four (4) units were selected from the new move-in list and the rent to those units were to be determined reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy at time of leasing and during the term of the contract. It was determined that rent to four (4) out of four (4) units selected could not be determined reasonable in accordance with the Authority?s policy. Known Questioned Costs: $22,822 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program and a material weakness in the Mainstream Vouchers and Emergency Housing Vouchers Programs in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to reasonable rent. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance and the Mainstream Vouchers and Emergency Housing Vouchers Programs are in material non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to reasonable rent. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: The Authority has recognized the deficiencies in the Housing Voucher Cluster Programs and will implement internal control procedures that will ensure compliance of federal regulations.