Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
56,575
In database
Filtered Results
53,589
Matching current filters
Showing Page
903 of 2144
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding 571621 (2023-003)
Significant Deficiency 2023
The County will adopt a procurement policy in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. This will be done with an ordinance passed by the county board.
The County will adopt a procurement policy in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. This will be done with an ordinance passed by the county board.
Finding 2023-005 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF will enhance its internal processes and staffing to ensure the timely submission of future Single Audit Reporting Packages...
Finding 2023-005 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF will enhance its internal processes and staffing to ensure the timely submission of future Single Audit Reporting Packages. In January 2025, CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager dedicated to overseeing federal grant management, including the coordination and timely submission of all required audit and reporting packages. Key actions include:  Establishing and maintaining a robust timeline for audit activities, closely collaborating with both the accounting team and external auditors to guarantee adherence to submission deadlines.  Implementing a cross-training program within the accounting and compliance departments to mitigate the risk of disruption due to staff turnover, ensuring multiple staff members are proficient in handling audit-related tasks.  Scheduling regular internal audits and compliance checks to proactively identify and address potential issues well in advance of filing deadlines. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025.
Finding 2023-004 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF will conduct a thorough review and update of its reporting policies and procedures to ensure alignment with the requiremen...
Finding 2023-004 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF will conduct a thorough review and update of its reporting policies and procedures to ensure alignment with the requirements of Federal Awards. In January 2025, CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager responsible for overseeing the preparation, review, and submission of all grant-related reports. Key actions include:  Ensuring compliance with GAAP and federal regulations for timely and accurate submission of quarterly financial and progress reports.  Coordinating with relevant departments, managing grant accounting processing system submissions, and acting as the primary point of contact for grantor agencies regarding reporting matters.  Conducting mandatory training sessions for existing staff on the updated reporting procedures and compliance with federal requirements, with detailed instructions on Financial Reporting Forms emphasizing accuracy and timeliness.  Implementing a tracking system to monitor deadlines and the submission status of all required reports.  Scheduling regular internal audits to verify adherence to these reporting protocols and identify potential gaps in compliance. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025.
Finding 2023-003 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager starting January 2025 who will assume comprehensive oversight of all facets of grant adm...
Finding 2023-003 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager starting January 2025 who will assume comprehensive oversight of all facets of grant administration and compliance. The grant manager's duties will include ensuring that all reimbursement requests are substantiated by adequate documentation, such as actual invoices, payroll registers, and payment records. Key actions include:  Establishing a systematic process for the collection, organization, and retention of all requisite documents.  Implementing internal review and approval procedures to guarantee that every reimbursement request undergoes thorough vetting and receives approval prior to submission, with explicit documentation of the review process.  Instructing both existing and new personnel on these newly instituted procedures to prevent future inconsistencies. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025.
Finding 2023-002 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager starting January 2025 to oversee compliance and internal control processes for federal a...
Finding 2023-002 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager starting January 2025 to oversee compliance and internal control processes for federal awards, ensuring adherence to 2 CFR Part 200. The Outsourced Grant Manager will implement systems to accurately allocate salaries, wages, and other expenditures. Key actions include:  Payroll Expenditures: Establish procedures to approve payroll allocations based on actual time and effort reporting, requiring supervisor approval and periodic reviews for compliance.  Non-Payroll Expenditures: Develop approval processes for non-payroll expenses, ensuring detailed documentation and implementing checks to verify overhead allocations.  Documentation and Review: Implement a comprehensive filing system for approvals and supporting documents, with regular training for staff.  Ongoing Compliance Monitoring: Conduct periodic internal audits to ensure adherence to internal controls and federal regulations, addressing issues promptly. These measures will strengthen CDF’s internal controls, ensure compliance, and maintain the integrity of federal award management. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025.
View Audit 362526 Questioned Costs: $1
Management instituted policies and procedures for the timely closing and preparation of the financial statements.
Management instituted policies and procedures for the timely closing and preparation of the financial statements.
Finding 571537 (2023-001)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Audit Finding Reference: 2023-001 - Improve Controls and Documentation over Reporting Process Planned Corrective Action: The Town acknowledges the discrepancy noted in the audit finding regarding the timing and documentation of expenditures included in the P&E Annual Report for the ARPA grant. We a...
Audit Finding Reference: 2023-001 - Improve Controls and Documentation over Reporting Process Planned Corrective Action: The Town acknowledges the discrepancy noted in the audit finding regarding the timing and documentation of expenditures included in the P&E Annual Report for the ARPA grant. We appreciate the opportunity to address this issue and confirm that we will implement improvements to strengthen our reporting process. Moving forward, the Town will utilize the MUNIS accounting system more effectively to ensure all expenditures are properly recorded and reported within the appropriate reporting periods. In addition, internal procedures will be reviewed and updated to reinforce timely data entry and review of grant-related transactions. Responsible staff have been made aware of the finding, and steps will be taken to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: May 2025 Persion Resonsible for Corrective Action: Stephanie Pemberton, Town Accountant Please consider this the Town's official corrective action response to be included in the final audit report.
Finding #2023-003: Federal Procedure Manual Federal Program: #10.7 60 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Federal Grantor: US. Department of Agriculture ...
Finding #2023-003: Federal Procedure Manual Federal Program: #10.7 60 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Federal Grantor: US. Department of Agriculture Pass-through Entity: N/A Criteria: Non-federal entities who receive federal or state grants or have grant programs should have documented policies and procedures in place over grants and grant expenditures. Condition: Internal controls over federal grants should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that misstatement in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards would be prevented or detected. Cause: The Village does not have documented policies and procedures in place over grants and grant expenditures. Effect: Without documented policies and procedures, the internal control over federal grants is low, and the risk of misstatement in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards is high. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the Village works on written policies and procedures over grants and grant expenditures. Grantee Response: The Village will work with their auditor to develop and adopt written grant procedures that are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Contact Person: Lee Kucher Anticipated Completion: December 31, 2025
St. John’s Lutheran Home of Albert Lea submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended September 30, 2023. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Lethert, Skwira, Schultz & Co. LLP, 170 E 7th Place, Saint Paul, MN 55101 Audit period: October 1, 2022 – September ...
St. John’s Lutheran Home of Albert Lea submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended September 30, 2023. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Lethert, Skwira, Schultz & Co. LLP, 170 E 7th Place, Saint Paul, MN 55101 Audit period: October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2023 The findings from the September 30, 2023 schedule of findings, questioned costs and recommendations. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT Finding 2023-001 - Auditor Preparation of the Financial Statements Material Weakness Finding Summary: The Organization does not have an internal control system designed to provide for the preparation of the complete consolidated financial statements, including the accompanying footnotes, as required by GAAP. We were also requested to draft the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements. Corrective Action Plan: It is not cost effective to have an internal control system designed to provide for the preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes. We requested that our auditors Lethert, Skwira, Schultz & Co. LLP, prepare the financial statements and the accompanying notes to the financial statements as a part of their annual audit. We have designated a member of management to review the drafted financial statements and accompanying notes. Responsible Individuals: Heather King, Director of Finance, 507-473-1066 Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing
Oversight Agency for Audit Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2023. Name of independent accounting firm: Haynie & Company Audit Period: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. The ...
Oversight Agency for Audit Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2023. Name of independent accounting firm: Haynie & Company Audit Period: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. The finding from the December 31, 2023 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs is discussed below. Finding 2023-1 Comments of the finding and recommendation: Management agrees with the finding. Action taken: We will assign the Executive Director to oversee all federal reporting deadlines and implement a centralized compliance calendar with automated reminders. Internal policies will be updated to require a formal review of reporting documents at least 45 days prior to submission deadlines. Additionally, relevant staff will receive training on Uniform Guidance requirements, and quarterly compliance meetings will be held to monitor progress. These actions are intended to ensure timely and accurate future submissions in accordance with federal regulations. If the oversight agency has questions regarding this plan, please email Steven Cordova, executive director of Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries at scordova@totalconcept.net. Sincerely yours, Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries
2023-006 Management Response: Management respectfully disagrees with this Finding. • Under Condition, the finding states, “Time and effort is being tracked and maintained by employees, including hours charged to the specific efforts for the programs.…” This is not accurate. Employees report th...
2023-006 Management Response: Management respectfully disagrees with this Finding. • Under Condition, the finding states, “Time and effort is being tracked and maintained by employees, including hours charged to the specific efforts for the programs.…” This is not accurate. Employees report their time worked each day, including the amount of time they worked on different projects if applicable. Employees report this in our commercial HRIS/Payroll system, where it is maintained and where it is reviewed and approved by the employee’s manager. The employees report the time they worked and which project(s) they worked on, their managers review and approve the time and the distribution, and the data is tracked and maintained in our HRIS/Payroll system (ExponentHR). • Also under Condition, the finding states, “The specific amount of employee salaries and wages that are allocated to specific federal programs for reimbursement, and which are less than the amounts reflected in time and effort records, are determined by members of the finance staff.” It is correct that we would have to invoice sponsors for less than the total cost of an employee’s allocated time and effort if a sponsor’s budget is not sufficient to cover that full amount. This is the correct procedure to follow. Employees correctly continue documenting their hours worked on a specific project even if the budget is expended and the accounting staff can no longer bill the sponsor. If a particular grant does not have sufficient sponsor funds, then the Grants Accounting staff reduce the bill accordingly. • Also under Condition, the finding states, “The rationale for the amount actually allocated for reimbursement, if less than the amount reflected in time and effort records, is not documented”. This is incorrect. Our monthly invoices to each sponsor accumulate, with each invoice clearly showing not only that month’s expense but also the year-to-date expense and remaining balance, which forces the sponsor invoice to stop at an amount less than the total cost of employees’ time and effort when the budget is exhausted. • Also under Condition, the finding states, “Review and approval of the allocation of employee compensation to specific federal programs reimbursement requests is not maintained.” Each employee records their hours worked, and the project(s) on which they worked those hours, in our HRIS/Payroll system. The employee’s manager reviews and approves both the hours worked and the projects on which the hours were worked. This review and approval is maintained in our HRIS/Payroll system. Financial staff calculate the amount to allocate to specific federal programs based on these HRIS/Payroll system records (or other records such as clinical units produced, based on the terms of each grant). Separate accounting staff review the sponsor invoice and post the Receivable once they deem the invoice correct. • Under Cause, the finding states, “…..the Organization has not implemented a structured process for documenting the extent to which allowable [emphasis added] compensation costs will be allocated for reimbursement to specific federal programs in instances where the allowable compensation cost exceeds the amount allocated for reimbursement.” This means that we do not have a process for documenting how much of a payroll expense already deemed allowable on a particular grant will actually be invoiced there. We disagree and believe that the presence and documentation of a limited sponsor budget, along with cumulative tracking and documentation of compensation expenses against that budget, proves and documents why sometimes full compensation costs are not charged to a grant. • Under Possible Effect, the finding addresses possible effects of “the absence of documented allocation methodologies.” We don’t agree that our process could lead to improper allocation between federal programs (as the finding states) nor to misstating federal expenditures (as the finding states). When a sponsor’s budget is insufficient to cover its appropriately allocated compensation costs, those costs are paid from unrestricted, non-federal funds. As also noted in the finding, no questioned costs were identified.
2023 – 005 - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance: Allowable Costs and Activities Recommendation: 1. Implement a Formal Expenditure Review and Approval Policy – Establish a policy requiring that all expenditures charged to grants be reviewed and approved by an appropriate...
2023 – 005 - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance: Allowable Costs and Activities Recommendation: 1. Implement a Formal Expenditure Review and Approval Policy – Establish a policy requiring that all expenditures charged to grants be reviewed and approved by an appropriate individual before being recorded in the system. 2. Require Documentation of Review and Approval – Ensure that invoices, payroll allocations, and other cost support documents include a signature, initials, or system-generated approval to confirm review. 3. Utilize System-Based Controls – If possible, configure the financial system to require electronic approval for all grant-related expenditures before costs are recorded. Management View: Management partially agrees with the finding. While we acknowledge that documentation of expenditure approval was not always retrievable, we believe the expenditures reviewed were all appropriate. Finding 2023-006 refers to the auditors’ assessment of expenditure review and approval processes that occurred in Calendar Year 2023. During Calendar Year 2023, Prism relied on email routing of expenditures for review and approval. As of this writing, Prism Health North Texas’ expenditure review and approval processes already meet or exceed the recommendations above. Action Taken: 1. Expenditure Review – All expenditures charged to grants are reviewed and approved by two qualified individuals. 2. Documentation of Review and Approval – a. Such review and approval for non-payroll expenditures occur in and are documented in the SAP Concur software before the costs are recorded in the accounting system (Abila). b. Such review and approval for payroll-related expenditures occur via and are documented via a combination of methods, also before they are recorded in Abila. i. Employees report their time, including how much time was devoted to grant activities, in the ExponentHR payroll system, and their supervisors approve both the time and the allocation in that system. ii. Programmatic measures that also support grant billing (“units”) are calculated from activity documented in the athenaOne electronic health record (EHR). iii. Payroll allocation is calculated by one person, based on the ExponentHR documentation and the units, then reviewed and imported into Abila by a second person. The unposted transactions are reviewed again before posting. 3. Utilize System-Based Controls – In place as above. Anticipated Completion Date: The recommendations are already in place. Responsible Contact Person(s): • Name: General Laffitte • Title: Vice President of Finance and Accounting • Phone: 214-623-6896 • Address: 3900 Junius St. Ste. 300, Dallas, Texas 75246 • Name: Jana Voege • Title: Chief Financial Officer Address: 3900 Junius St. Ste. 300, Dallas, Texas 75246 Corrective Action Plan Date: 4/28/2025 Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit Prism Health North Texas respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended FY2023. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Armanino LLP 15950 Dallas Pkwy #600, Dallas, TX 75248 (972) 661 - 1843 Audit Period: The consolidated financial statements of AIDS Arms, Inc. were audited for the period of calendar year 2022 and 2023. The findings from the year ended December 31, 2023, schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The Findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule.
2023 – 004 Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Preparation, Reconciliation, and Retention of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Recommendation: 4. Develop a Standardized SEFA Reconciliation Process – Implement formal policies and procedures requiring that SEFA expenditure...
2023 – 004 Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Preparation, Reconciliation, and Retention of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Recommendation: 4. Develop a Standardized SEFA Reconciliation Process – Implement formal policies and procedures requiring that SEFA expenditures be reconciled to the general ledger on a monthly basis, with documentation maintained for audit purposes. 5. Enhance System Controls for Grant Expenditures – Modify the financial system to allow for the proper segregation of state and federal expenditures from non-grant funds, ensuring that expenditures are properly classified at the time of entry. 6. Require Monthly Documentation Reviews – Establish a control requiring management to review and approve SEFA reconciliation schedules on a monthly or quarterly basis to ensure accuracy and completeness. 7. Implement a Centralized Documentation Retention Policy – Require that all SEFA-related reconciliation records, including general ledger tie-outs and manual adjustments, be retained in a centralized, accessible location. 8. Provide Grants Management Training – Conduct training for grants management and accounting personnel on SEFA preparation requirements, including Uniform Guidance compliance and best practices for documentation and reconciliation. Management View: Management partially agrees with the finding. While we acknowledge that documentation supporting SEFA reconciliation was incomplete, we believe that federal expenditures were properly accounted for. We would like to address some of the auditors’ points individually: • “The SEFA is prepared based on amounts requested for reimbursement instead of directly based on expenditures incurred.” Most grant awards do not fully fund the programs they support, most grant awards do not run concurrently with Prism Health North Texas’ fiscal year (i.e., with the Calendar Year), and most grant awards are not spent in equal monthly amounts. It is correct that the 2023 SEFA was based on grant-appropriate expenditures that occurred during Calendar Year 2023 and were submitted to those grant sponsors for reimbursement. This will not necessarily reach the full cost to Prism for each grant-supported program, nor is it likely to exactly match any annual grant award amount. • “Expenses recorded in the general ledger represent expenses incurred to operate the program in addition to direct grant expenditures; the Organization only requests reimbursement for direct program expenditures allowable under the program.” As we confirmed verbally with the audit partner on April 25, 2025, this statement is intended to provide information and context and is not a criticism or intended to point out any problem. As stated above, most grant awards do not fully fund the programs they support; therefore, the general ledger necessarily includes both expenses the sponsor will reimburse and expenses the sponsor will not reimburse. Nonetheless, we are enhancing our reconciliation procedures and documentation practices to fully meet audit requirements. Finding 2023-004 refers to the auditors’ assessment of the SEFA preparation and reconciliation processes that occurred in Calendar Year 2023. As of this writing, Prism Health North Texas has already changed its SEFA preparation and reconciliation processes and meets many of the recommendations above. Action Taken: 4. Documentation Retention – On April 25, 2025, management created a structured and easily accessible system for storing all relevant information for all grants management personnel. a. A logical naming system for files identifying the SEFA period, the funding agency and identified general ledger expenditures claimed on the SEFA. b. We are now documenting the difference between all GL transactions and those submitted for sponsor reimbursement (i.e., SEFA components) in a single document per fund code, arranged by fiscal year. Previously this documentation was kept by invoice and arranged by grant year. c. Management will continue to ensure all expenditure-related support, such as invoices and purchase orders, is saved electronically to all financial transactions. 5. SEFA Reconciliation – Management has decided to move from an annual to quarterly SEFA reconciliation process to enhance the frequency of management oversight in SEFA draft preparation. VP of Finance will prepare the SEFA for independent review by the CFO. This will be put into a written policy/procedure. 6. System Enhancements – Prism’s current accounting system does not accommodate this. However, Prism is already in the later stages of selecting a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solution, with this as one of our key selection criteria. Our new ERP should allow for expenditures within the same cost center to be identified as grant-reimbursable or non-grant-reimbursable at the time of entry. We have identified opportunities in new financial management software solutions that we are scheduled to demo May 12th and the 16th of 2025. Opportunities such as: a. The ability to tag grant-reimbursable transactions, to segment our award cost center into two important categories. i. The full cost to manage a specific program ii. Identified cost claimed on the SEFA b. Dedicated grant modules that will allow us to establish business rules and workflows to streamline and digitize critical aspects of grant management. 7. Staff Engagement – Cross department coordination meetings occur monthly between the Finance organization and the Grants Management team to continue to foster alignment and collaboration in our grant cycles. A general overview of SEFA, including how to prepare and organize the monthly reconciliations, has already occurred with some of the grants accountants. Anticipated Completion Date: We expect all but system enhancements to be in place by July 31st, 2025, to contribute significantly to the strength of our internal controls and stakeholder confidence in our SEFA reporting. Responsible Contact Person(s): • Name: General Laffitte • Title: Vice President of Finance and Accounting • Phone: 214-623-6896 • Address: 3900 Junius St. Ste. 300, Dallas, Texas 75246 • Name: Jana Voege • Title: Chief Financial Officer • Address: 3900 Junius St. Ste. 300, Dallas, Texas 75246
Finding No. 2023-007 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordanc...
Finding No. 2023-007 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordance with the Rehabilitation and Preservation Activities (570.202(b)(2) and/or (11)) during the grant period.. Condition The owner paid 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested, that was not incurred during the grant period and charged through to and was reimbursed by PHB under their CDBG Grant. Cause REACH's Community Builders Program Manager did not ensure that the invoices were for the appropriate grant period. Effect or Potential Effect CDBG funds may be spent inappropriately and REACH may be required to repay the grants and it may also result in a possible loss of future grants. Questioned Costs: $35. Context In connection with the procedures applied to compliance testing, there was 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested that was not for cost incurred during the grant period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation REACH Community Builders Program Manager should follow procedures to ensure each vendor invoice is incurred during the grant period. Views of Responsible Officials Community Builders Program cell phone billing is part of the larger REACH billing system and this does create some challenges in approving billing as our IT department approves this billing. We are putting systems in place for the Community Builders Program Manager will work closer with the finance team to ensure all billing involves are for the correct time periods.
View Audit 362297 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding No. 2023-006 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordanc...
Finding No. 2023-006 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordance with the Rehabilitation and Preservation Activities (570.202(b)(2) and/or (11)). Condition The owner paid 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested, that were not listed on the CDBG Address List as reported to Portland Housing Bureau (“PHB”) and charged through to and was reimbursed by PHB under their CDBG Grant. Cause REACH's Community Builders Program Manager did not ensure that the invoices were for an approved CDBG property. Effect or Potential Effect CDBG funds may be spent inappropriately and REACH may be required to repay the grants and it may also result in a possible loss of future grants. Questioned Costs: $40. Context In connection with the procedures applied to compliance testing, there was 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested that was not for an approved CDBG property. Repeat Finding: Yes – Finding 2022-007 Recommendation REACH Community Builders Program Manager should follow procedures to match each vendor invoice to the approved CDBG property listing prior to coding to CDBG and passing through for reimbursement from this grant. Views of Responsible Officials This instance was $40 that was in fact allocated incorrectly and the $40 spend was paid back to PHB in October 2024.
View Audit 362297 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding No. 2023-005 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N- Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with the Clark Count...
Finding No. 2023-005 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N- Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with the Clark County Community Services CDBG Procedures Manual and grant documents. Condition In connection with our lease file review we noted two instances of seven tenants tested where management was unable to locate tenant files. Cause Management’s policies with respect to eligibility and the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with Compliance in Clark County Community Services CDBG Procedures Manual and grant documents were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants. Questioned Costs: N/A. Context In connection with the procedures applied to our CDBG units testing, two of the seven tenants tested did have lease files available. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to ensure that correct income verification procedures are performed timely, tenant eligibility is correctly determined and that tenant lease files are properly maintained in accordance with the requirements of Clark County Community Services CDBG Procedures Manual and grant documents. Views of Responsible Officials The Compliance Specialist discovered missing files at a property while pulling files for the audit. The Compliance team worked to contact residents and rebuild the files with the missing documents. Compliance management investigated and determined the cause of the missing documents was due to a prior site manager not scanning and filing the appropriate documents, along with high staff turnover during this time. The Compliance team is finalizing a new procedure, in addition to the existing, to audit Yardi Voyager for uploaded completed files after move-in and recertification: the goal of this is to catch missing files and documents timely and hold site teams accountable for following the required procedures.
Finding No. 2023-004 HUD Low Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990 Federal Assistance Listing Number #99.999 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N- Special Tests and Provisions Criteria In accordance with the Use Agreement, Housing Quality Standards require th...
Finding No. 2023-004 HUD Low Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990 Federal Assistance Listing Number #99.999 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N- Special Tests and Provisions Criteria In accordance with the Use Agreement, Housing Quality Standards require that the Owner shall maintain the property in good repair and condition. Condition Management did not have in place proper procedures and controls to ensure that HQS inspections were performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Cause Management did not perform HQS inspections during the year ended December 31 2023. Effect or Potential Effect Housing units may be out of compliance with HUD Quality Standards. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to tenant file testing there were 3 instances of the 3 files tested where the passing HQS inspections were not performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation Management should resume making sure all units meet the HUD Housing Quality Standards and ensure that the responses to any findings are cleared timely. Views of Responsible Officials REACH did return to doing HQS Inspections in 2023, with staffing shortages it is possible that not every unit was inspected in 2023. Specifically, around the 3 instances of the 3 files tested after the finding were provided to REACH we provided the annual inspection for unit #11 at Beacon. For unit #5 at Beacon the annual inspection was not in the current resident file that was tested because the unit was vacant at the time of 2023 annual inspection. The annual inspection for the last file at Taylor this inspection was missed due to staffing changes at the time. REACH continued to reestablish our annual unit inspection process post COVID in 2024.
Finding No. 2023-003 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Each owner must comply with the requirements set forth in 24 CFR Part 92 regulations as outlined in the "Compliance in HOME Re...
Finding No. 2023-003 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Each owner must comply with the requirements set forth in 24 CFR Part 92 regulations as outlined in the "Compliance in HOME Rental Projects: A Guide for Property Owners" published by HUD which requires the property to maintain the contracted number of HOME units as well as the designated splits in bedroom size and High Home/Low Home unit ratios. Condition The owner did not make available to HOME tenants the contracted number and type of HOME units. Cause Management’s policies with respect to maintaining the number and split of contracted HOME units were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect The procedures for determining and maintaining the correct HOME units within the property were not applied. This could result in ineligible tenants occupying HOME designated units. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to our HOME units testing, one of the five properties tested did not meet the contracted HOME units size portfolio (there should be four 3-bedroom units (there are 5); and there should be three 4-bedroom units (there are 2)). Repeat Finding: Yes - Finding 2022-003 Recommendation Management should follow procedures in place to ensure consistent application and adherence to the requirements in accordance with the “Compliance in HOME Rental Projects: A Guide for Property Owners” published by HUD. Views of Responsible Officials A unit will be re-classified the next time there is a vacant unit of the corresponding size/type.
Finding No. 2023-002 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with the Compliance in State ...
Finding No. 2023-002 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with the Compliance in State of Oregon Housing and Community Services HOME Program Compliance Manual. Condition In connection with our lease file review we noted four instances of eight tenants tested where management did not provide support that they performed a 3rd party income verification in accordance with policy. Cause Management’s policies with respect to recertifications and eligibility and the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with Compliance in State of Oregon Housing and Community Services HOME Program Compliance Manual were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to our HOME units testing, four of the eight tenants tested did not have the a 3rd party income verification in accordance with policy. Repeat Finding: Yes - Finding 2022-002 Recommendation Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to ensure that recertifications and correct income verification procedures are performed timely, tenant eligibility is correctly determined and that tenant lease files are properly maintained in accordance with the requirements of Compliance in State of Oregon Housing and Community Services HOME Program Compliance Manual. Views of Responsible Officials For the properties in Washington, they have several sources of HOME funds based on the issuing jurisdiction State, County or City that adds a layer of complexity to the recertification process and due to staffing turnover, both at the properties and REACH main office some of the HOME 3rd party income verifications were missed at recertification. Management has established policies and procedures for complying with the HOME program which includes a centralized tracker for HOME certifications.
Finding No. 2023-001 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N-Special Tests and Provisions Criteria During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the nonfederal entity must maintain subsidized...
Finding No. 2023-001 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N-Special Tests and Provisions Criteria During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the nonfederal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than (a) every three years for projects containing one to four units, (b) every two years for projects containing five to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME/HOME-ARP-assisted tenant- based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition The owner did not ensure passing HQS inspections were performed during 2023. Cause Management did not have in place proper procedures and controls to ensure that HQS inspections were performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Effect or Potential Effect Housing units may be out of compliance with HUD Quality Standards. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to tenant file testing there were 8 instances of the 8 files tested where the passing HQS inspections were not performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Repeat Finding: Yes - Finding 2022-001 Recommendation Management should resume making sure all units meet the HUD Housing Quality Standards and ensure that the responses to any findings are cleared timely. Views of Responsible Officials REACH did return to doing HQS Inspections in 2023. With staffing shortages, it is possible that not every unit was inspected in 2023. REACH continued to reestablish our annual unit inspection process post COVID in 2024. For the finding related to Addy St. This property is managed by a 3rd party management company, REACH’s Asset Management team will work with the management company to ensure all inspections are happening.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of auditee: Friends of the Mission Finding: 2023-003 Name of audit firm: Propp Christensen Caniglia LLP Period covered by the audit: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 CAP prepared by: Scott Thurmond, Executive Director Telephone: (916) 416-0901 Comments: Managemen...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of auditee: Friends of the Mission Finding: 2023-003 Name of audit firm: Propp Christensen Caniglia LLP Period covered by the audit: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 CAP prepared by: Scott Thurmond, Executive Director Telephone: (916) 416-0901 Comments: Management agrees with the finding. Actions: Management has taken steps to ensure the SEFA is prepared accurately and timely.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of auditee: Friends of the Mission Finding: 2023-002 Name of audit firm: Propp Christensen Caniglia LLP Period covered by the audit: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 CAP prepared by: Scott Thurmond, Executive Director Telephone: (916) 416-0901 Comments: Managemen...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of auditee: Friends of the Mission Finding: 2023-002 Name of audit firm: Propp Christensen Caniglia LLP Period covered by the audit: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 CAP prepared by: Scott Thurmond, Executive Director Telephone: (916) 416-0901 Comments: Management agrees with the finding. Actions: Management will ensure that audited financial statements are submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the required time frame.
Finding 2023-003 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Other Matters Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Condition: During our test of cont...
Finding 2023-003 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Other Matters Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Condition: During our test of controls over compliance it was noted that payroll for a Tutor was charged to the Education Stabilization ESSER II major program grant, however the expense should have been charged to the ESSER III major program instead. Criteria: Costs charged to the Education Stabilization ESSER II major program should meet the requirements as set forth by Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200, subpart E (Cost Principles). Context: During our review of payroll transactions posted to the Education Stabilization ESSER II major program it was noted that a Tutor charged to the Education Stabilization ESSER II major program grant should have been charged to Education Stabilization ESSER III based on the supporting documentation provided. Effect: Town of Acushnet was not in compliance with the allowable costs/ cost principals requirement as set forth by the Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200, subpart E (Cost Principles). Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Cause: The Town of Acushnet (School Department) implemented “best” practice of spending down older grant (ESSER II) awards prior to spending down newer awards. Due to timing, the grant budget was not amended prior to spend down of this related expense. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Town of Acushnet follow procedures to ensure that payroll expenditures charged to the grants are allowable costs as set forth by Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200, subpart E (Cost Principles) Managements Response: We acknowledge the finding related to the payroll transaction for the Tutor charged to the Education Stabilization ESSER II major program grant. Upon review, we agree that based on the supporting documentation, the charges should have been posted to Education Stabilization ESSER III, rather than ESSER II. This was a result of a late adjustment made in order to utilize the remaining ESSER II funds before transitioning to the use of ESSER III funds. We understand the importance of correctly applying charges to the appropriate funding source and moving forward, we will ensure that our procedures are adjusted to avoid such misallocations and that all future charges are properly aligned with the designated funding source, in accordance with the established guidelines. Responsible for Corrective Plan: School Business Manager Estimated Completion Date: Fiscal Year 2024 Action Taken: The Schools have reviewed and updated our procedures to ensure that all future changes are properly aligned with the designated funding source in accordance with the established guidelines.
Finding 571294 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Finding 2023-002 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Program Criteria...
Finding 2023-002 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Program Criteria: Where employees work solely or partially on a single Federal program or cost objective, their salaries or wages must be supported by periodic certification that the employee worked on these programs for the period covered by the programs. The certifications should be prepared at least semi-annually, and or monthly and should be signed by the employee or supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Condition: During our test of controls over compliance with time and effort certifications the school department was not able to provide evidence that required certifications of time and effort for those employees whose time was spent either completely or partially spent on these programs were performed as required by Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: During our test of payroll transactions of the Education Stabilization Fund grants it was noted that the time and effort certifications did not meet the semiannual and or monthly certification requirements. Effect: The School Department was not in compliance with the time and effort certification requirements. Cause: The School Department completed time and effort certifications on an annual basis rather than semi-annual or monthly. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the School Department follow procedures to ensure that semi-annual certifications and/or monthly certifications are prepared and signed by either the employees and/or supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employees in a timely manner in order to comply with the time and effort certification requirement. Managements Response: We acknowledge and agree with the recommendation to ensure that semi-annual and/or monthly certifications are prepared and signed by employees and/or supervisory officials who have first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employees. We understand the importance of complying with the time and effort certification requirements. We would like to communicate that annual certifications were completed in FY 23, however, we will ensure that moving forward these certifications will be on a semi-annual and/or monthly basis. Responsible for Corrective Plan: School Business Manager Estimated Completion Date: Fiscal Year 2024 Action Taken: The Schools are now ensuring that their annual certification process be completed on a semi-annual and/or monthly basis, whichever is deemed necessary for the related position wages.
Finding 571292 (2023-001)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Finding 2023-001 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Criteria:...
Finding 2023-001 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. As governmental subrecipients of states are also required to use the same state procurement policies and procedures for federal funds as for non‐federal funds, the Town is required to follow Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter (MGL) 30(b). MGL 30(b) requires the solicitation of three written or oral quotes for procurements of supplies between $10,000 and $49,999 and sealed bids or proposals for procurements of supplies $50,000 and over. Management of the Town is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with federal requirements that have a direct and material effect on a federal program. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. Condition and Context: During fiscal year 2023, the Town did not comply with the required procurement policies and procedures process for procurements that exceeded both State and Federal thresholds. Questioned Costs: Unkown Cause: A Town State/Federal grants procedures manual that included proper procurement procedures did not exist until February 2023. Effect or Potential Effect: Due to the weaknesses in internal controls noted above, there is a risk that amounts charged to federal awards may not be in accordance with procurement, suspension, and debarment principles. No known questioned costs are reported, as it is not quantifiable. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes, finding number 2022-002 Recommendation: The Town should address the weaknesses in internal controls noted above in order to ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with federal and state requirements. Managements Response: We acknowledge the audit finding related to non-compliance with the required procurement policies and procedures for procurements exceeding the State and Federal thresholds during Fiscal Year 2023. The Town and Schools have Acushnet’s Federal Grant Procedures Manual (February 2023) to ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with Federal and State requirements – in particular, the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. We are pleased to report that we believe to have addressed this issue in Fiscal Year 2024 to ensure compliance with the procurement policies and procedures, as required by both State and Federal threshold. Responsible for Corrective Plan: School Business Manager Estimated Completion Date: Fiscal Year 2024 Action Taken: The Town and Schools have adopted Acushnet’s Federal Grant Procedures Manual (February 2023). This manual ensures that all procurements are conducted in accordance with the relevant Federal and State procurement standards, specifically the requirements outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. We are pleased to report that we have taken steps to address this issue and believe we have successfully ensured compliance with these procurement policies and procedures.
« 1 901 902 904 905 2144 »