Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,799
In database
Filtered Results
58,544
Matching current filters
Showing Page
400 of 2342
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding Reference: Eide Bailly LLP, 2024 Single Audit, 2024-029 Assistance Listing 21.027 Summary: The 2024 audit tested two subrecipients applicable to the Department of Native American Affairs. These two subrecipients were identified as not having a risk assessment performed in both cases. Cause: ...
Finding Reference: Eide Bailly LLP, 2024 Single Audit, 2024-029 Assistance Listing 21.027 Summary: The 2024 audit tested two subrecipients applicable to the Department of Native American Affairs. These two subrecipients were identified as not having a risk assessment performed in both cases. Cause: At the start of the NIC (DNAA) Tribal ARPA Program the documents were not available. The NIC (DNAA) did not have access to SAM.GOV to verify the needed documentation. Corrective Action: Require Subrecipient Risk Assessment Worksheet be completed for each subgrantee as part of the pre-award process. Timeline & Monitoring: Worksheet and subgrantee requirements to be created and enhanced immediately by DNAA. Approval of subgrantee awards will not be deemed eligibly if requested documents are not received. Management Analyst (Janet Davis/Sarina Nez), to review applications for eligibility based upon pre-award requirements. A Budget Analyst (John McCauley), or Programs Officer (Savena Rogers), will serve as backup in the absence of Management Analyst in review process. Management Analyst will review internal documents monthly for compliance and ensure copies are maintained at the DNAA office in Carson City, NV. **Update, as of November 2025, this process was performed and completed relative to subsequent subgrantee allocations. Respectfully, Stacey Montooth Executive Director
OAG CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Assistance Lis􀆟ng Number (ALN): 21.027 Eide Bailly Finding Number: 2024-029 Contact Person: John Dekoekkoek, Office of the A􀆩orney General Chief Financial Officer Summary of The Finding: The review determined that a risk assessment was not performed and subrecipient monito...
OAG CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Assistance Lis􀆟ng Number (ALN): 21.027 Eide Bailly Finding Number: 2024-029 Contact Person: John Dekoekkoek, Office of the A􀆩orney General Chief Financial Officer Summary of The Finding: The review determined that a risk assessment was not performed and subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Office of the Attorney General (OAG) Response: The original intent of the OAG being involved with the subaward to Legal Aid of Southern Nevada was only to be the Fiscal Agent of the award. As only the fiscal agent, we understood that the GFO would be responsible for completing the risk assessments and any required monitoring. However, due to staff changes there appears to have been some miscommunication. If we would have known that we were going held accountable for risk assessments and monitoring, we would have folded this subrecipient into the established grant processes in place at the O􀆯ice of the Attorney General. In 2025 the Nevada Governor’s Office of Federal Assistance (OFA) released the updated Nevada Grant Policy Manual. This manual includes grant policies that are in line with 2CFR Part 200. The OAG follows the policies included in the manual including the Policy 010-004 Pre-Award Risk Assessments and Policy 010-015 Monitoring Subrecipients. Therefore, the OAG considers the Corrective Action Plan, already implemented.
Audit Finding 2024-028: U.S. Department of Treasury COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, 21.027 Finding: Inaccurate information was reported to the federal awarding agency. Recommendation: Recommend the Nevada Governor’s Finance Office (GFO) enhance internal controls to ensure ...
Audit Finding 2024-028: U.S. Department of Treasury COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, 21.027 Finding: Inaccurate information was reported to the federal awarding agency. Recommendation: Recommend the Nevada Governor’s Finance Office (GFO) enhance internal controls to ensure Project Expenditure Reports are reconciled to the underlying support documentation. Agency Response: Does the agency Agree with the Finding: Yes Corrective Action: To ensure full compliance going forward, we will take the following steps: The Governor’s Finance Office has enhanced its internal controls surrounding the preparation and review of Project and Expenditure Reports submitted to the federal awarding agency. As part of these improvements, GFO implemented a strengthened reconciliation process to verify that all reported financial data aligns with underlying support documentation prior to submission. After discovering this issue, GFO has reconciled the Project Expenditure Reports with all supporting documents except for the Revenue Loss allowance, which is still under review due to discrepancies. However, the obligated Revenue Loss remains substantially under the Revenue Loss cap. Remaining reconciliation work on the Revenue Loss component will be completed using validated source documentation to ensure accuracy and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Date of Completion: Reconciliations completed for all expenditure report components except the Revenue Loss allowance. Completion of the Revenue Loss reconciliation is expected in the upcoming reporting period. Agency Contact: Lesa Galloway, ASO IV Office (775) 684-0239 lgalloway@finance.nv.gov
Audit Finding 2024-027 Program name/assistance listing number: U.S. Department of Treasury COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, 21.027 Finding: The Nevada State Purchasing Division of the Department of Administration did not have adequate internal controls to ensure contracts u...
Audit Finding 2024-027 Program name/assistance listing number: U.S. Department of Treasury COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, 21.027 Finding: The Nevada State Purchasing Division of the Department of Administration did not have adequate internal controls to ensure contracts under federal awards contained all of the applicable contract provisions. Recommendation: We recommend State Purchasing enhance internal controls to ensure all contracts under federal awards contain the applicable provisions. Agency Response Does the Agency Agree with Finding: Yes Additional Comments: None Corrective Action Taken or to be Taken Action: As part of Purchasing’s standard contracting procedures, and shortly after the audit findings were discussed with GFO in January 2024, the Purchasing Division commenced fulfilling the recommendations regarding provisions described in Appendix II to Part 200 that had not been consistently included in contracts as indicated below. When Purchasing leads a Request for Proposal (RFP) process and is notified - via Section 4 of the RFP Template provided to agencies utilizing Federal Awarded Funds – Purchasing ensures that all applicable federal provisions and procedures are incorporated into the solicitation, either by reference or as attachments. For state agencies conducting their own solicitation, Purchasing provides an RFP Template that requires identification of the relevant Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to be referenced and included in the resulting contract, thereby supporting compliance with federal requirements. This corrective action (RE: provisions) has been actively in place since approximately January 2024. Date of Completion or Estimated Completion: Since there are active-holdover contracts, it will take an undetermined amount of time for the related mulit-year contracts to clear. Department or Agency Responsible for Corrective Action Plan Agency: Department of Administration – Purchasing Division Contact: William Taylor, Administrator 515 E. Musser Street, Suite 300 Carson City, NV 89701 775-515-5173 BTaylor@admin.nv.gov
Audit Finding: 2024-026 COVID-19 Homeowner Assistance Fund, 21.026 Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Summary: Subrecipient monitoring policies not in place. Subawards and disbursements did not contain all the required information, an evaluation of each sub...
Audit Finding: 2024-026 COVID-19 Homeowner Assistance Fund, 21.026 Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Summary: Subrecipient monitoring policies not in place. Subawards and disbursements did not contain all the required information, an evaluation of each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Recommendation: Implement internal controls to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Agency Response: The Division agrees with the finding. Corrective Action: The Division will establish subrecipient monitoring policies. The Division will also establish an internal audit and compliance committee to enhance oversight of existing policies for assessing, monitoring, and sharing best practices across its business. The internal audit and compliance committee will be responsible for reviewing internal controls and policies on an annual basis, following up on any audit findings and ensuring follow-through of corrective action plans. Adoption of Corrective Action: January 2025 Division Contact and Corrective Action Plan Lead: Christine Hess, Chief Financial Officer Nevada Housing Division 775-687-2249 chess@housing.nv.gov
Finding Number: 2024-023 Summary of finding: The Nevada Department of Agriculture (NDA) did not have internal controls to ensure subaward information was submitted in accordance with the FFATA. Subaward obligations were not reported in the FSRS and therefore not included on the FFATA’s website for p...
Finding Number: 2024-023 Summary of finding: The Nevada Department of Agriculture (NDA) did not have internal controls to ensure subaward information was submitted in accordance with the FFATA. Subaward obligations were not reported in the FSRS and therefore not included on the FFATA’s website for public information disclosure. Recommendation: The State agency should implement internal controls to ensure subaward information is submitted in accordance with the FFATA or to seek guidance for applicability towards permanent agreements with annual obligations. CAP Response: We will continue working with the USDA to establish a clear procedure and guidance for reporting FFATA requirements related to meal claims. At this time, the USDA does not consider meal claims to be subawards. We have requested clarification and a procedure regarding FFATA reporting for meal claims but have not yet received a response. Anticipated date of completion: Ongoing.
Finding Number: 2024-022 Summary of finding: Amounts reported on the FNS-10 report were not supported by the underlying accounting information. Recommendation: NDA should enhance internal controls to ensure FNS-10 reports are accurate or supporting documentation for reconciling items is maintained. ...
Finding Number: 2024-022 Summary of finding: Amounts reported on the FNS-10 report were not supported by the underlying accounting information. Recommendation: NDA should enhance internal controls to ensure FNS-10 reports are accurate or supporting documentation for reconciling items is maintained. CAP Response: The agency agrees and accepts this finding and will take the following steps to enhance internal controls to ensure compliance: The program staff responsible for completing the FNS-10 report will document and keep any notes for edits made to the FNS-10 report that are a result of our current system not tallying amounts or pulling amounts correctly for the FNS-10 report. This will begin immediately with the submission of the next monthly report. Anticipated date of completion: July 31, 2026
Finding Number: 2024-024 Summary of finding: NDA did not have adequate internal controls to ensure commodities were identified for the appropriate federal program in the SEFA. Prior to correction, commodities of $9,950,720 were identified under the National School Lunch Program 10.555, rather than t...
Finding Number: 2024-024 Summary of finding: NDA did not have adequate internal controls to ensure commodities were identified for the appropriate federal program in the SEFA. Prior to correction, commodities of $9,950,720 were identified under the National School Lunch Program 10.555, rather than the Emergency Food Assistance Program, 10.569. Recommendation: NDA should enhance internal controls to ensure commodities are identified for the appropriate federal program in the SEFA. CAP Response: The agency agrees and accepts this finding and will take the following steps to enhance internal controls to ensure compliance: The Food Distribution Supervisor will double-check all of the amounts, names and CFDA numbers on the SEFA. Then the ASO II will double-check that the programs names match the CFDA numbers prior to submitting the information for the SEFA. This process will be put in place immediately. Anticipated date of completion: August 31, 2026
As noted, one vendor was identified which required the Town to perform the verification procedure. The Town was unaware that this was required for a federal grant award. To correct this, the TA performed the required verification procedure and the vendor was not under suspension or debarred. The Tow...
As noted, one vendor was identified which required the Town to perform the verification procedure. The Town was unaware that this was required for a federal grant award. To correct this, the TA performed the required verification procedure and the vendor was not under suspension or debarred. The Town will adhere to this requirement on any federal award.
2024-001: Compliance with Reporting Requirements to Pass Through Agencies Type of Finding Compliance and Internal Control over Compliance - Material Weakness Criteria or Specific Requirement Grantees must comply with reporting requirements established by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary an...
2024-001: Compliance with Reporting Requirements to Pass Through Agencies Type of Finding Compliance and Internal Control over Compliance - Material Weakness Criteria or Specific Requirement Grantees must comply with reporting requirements established by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, the District's Pass-Through Grantor (State). In order for the State to comply with federal reporting requirements, the District is required to submit complete and accurate "Recipient Data Collection Forms" to the State. Condition and Context: The District did not submit data collection forms timely to the state, nor could the reporting documents submitted to the be reconciled timely to the Fiscal Year 2024 Amounts reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal awards. Cause: Management has not established guidelines and procedures to ensure and demonstrate that required reporting is completed, retained, and available for inspection during the audit. Effect or Potential Effect: Untimely or inaccurate reporting limits the ability of the state to complete its federal reporting requirements and limits its ability to effectively oversee the federal program. Questioned Costs None reported Recommendation The District should implement internal control procedures to ensure compliance with all grant requirements including the completion and retention of all required reports. The documentation should be filed in an organized manner and made readily available for inspection during the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the finding. The District has implemented a system to ensure reports are filed timely and accurately going forward.
Corrective Action Plan 2024-003 Delayed Completion and Submission of Single Audit Condition Found The Village did not complete and submit its Single Audit for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, within the required timeframe. Management determined that the Village had expended federal awards in...
Corrective Action Plan 2024-003 Delayed Completion and Submission of Single Audit Condition Found The Village did not complete and submit its Single Audit for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, within the required timeframe. Management determined that the Village had expended federal awards in excess of the Single Audit threshold only after the required audit planning and reporting timeline had been delayed. The delay occurred because the Village’s grant tracking process/system did not allow management to separately identify, classify, and monitor federal grant awards and expenditures apart from state grant awards and expenditures. As a result, management did not timely determine whether the Village met the federal expenditure threshold requiring a Single Audit for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Corrective Action Plan 1. Deficient Grant Tracking System / Process: The Village has completed our ERP implementation of Munis of Tyler Technologies. This allows for better review of grant tracking and cleaner allocations. 2. Inadequate Internal Controls Over Federal Awards: The Village has documented new post-award policies under Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Moving forward, both the managing department head and the Finance Director will sign off on the intake, classification, and tracking of new grant agreements to ensure proper oversight from day one. 3. Absence of a Formal Review Process: The Village will institute a mandatory quarterly threshold review and a comprehensive year-end pre-audit checklist. Prior to fiscal year-end, the Finance Department formally aggregates all active grant expenditures to evaluate whether federal outlays meet or exceed the $750,000 Single Audit threshold, ensuring early audit planning. Responsible Person for Corrective Action Plan Chris Frankenfield- Finance Director Implementation Date of Corrective Action Plan 1. August 18, 2025 2. March 31, 2027 3. March 31, 2027
Planned Corrective Action: Valley Health Associates will ensure accounting methods are consistent and include proper documentation. And, immediately ensure reports are submitted in a timely manner for the Medi-caid program.
Planned Corrective Action: Valley Health Associates will ensure accounting methods are consistent and include proper documentation. And, immediately ensure reports are submitted in a timely manner for the Medi-caid program.
Planned Corrective Action: We understand the severity of the finding and will maintain a Schedule of Expenditure of Federal Awards to be updated at month-end close as well as documented timesheets for all staff included in the expenditures list. This will be accomplished by providing training for pr...
Planned Corrective Action: We understand the severity of the finding and will maintain a Schedule of Expenditure of Federal Awards to be updated at month-end close as well as documented timesheets for all staff included in the expenditures list. This will be accomplished by providing training for procurement, finance, and administrative staff on: . Recognizing when a transaction exceeds the threshold. . Collecting and organizing supporting documentation. Valley Health Associates shall conduct periodic audits to: . Review SEFA report. . ldentify gaps or missing documentation and correct them promptly. . Document findings and corrective actions.
Planned Corrective Action: Valley Health Associates will implement a consistent review process per pay period to ensure payroll is allocated accurately to each program to the best ability possible and take quick action to fix any errors or adjustments.
Planned Corrective Action: Valley Health Associates will implement a consistent review process per pay period to ensure payroll is allocated accurately to each program to the best ability possible and take quick action to fix any errors or adjustments.
No recommendation was made by the auditor. No corrective action is consider necessary
No recommendation was made by the auditor. No corrective action is consider necessary
Finding 2024-004 - Section 3 of the Housing Community Development Act (HCDA) Policy and Procedures guide Fiscal Year Finding Initially Occurred: FY 2024 (Initial Finding) Name of Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Assistance Federal Listing Award Number Number Pr...
Finding 2024-004 - Section 3 of the Housing Community Development Act (HCDA) Policy and Procedures guide Fiscal Year Finding Initially Occurred: FY 2024 (Initial Finding) Name of Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Assistance Federal Listing Award Number Number Program Title 14.218 N/A CDBG - 7308 Pinedale Renovation Project Award Year: 2024 Criteria or specific requirement: According to Section 3 of the HCDA, grantees must establish and maintain documentation to demonstrate that workers on Section 3 projects meet the definition of a Section 3 worker or Targeted Section 3 worker, at the time of hire or the first reporting period. This includes requiring written reports from developers or contractors summarizing the totals for labor hours, including Section 3 worker and Targeted Section 3 worker labor hours, and documentation from employees or employers certifying that the employee met the requirements to receive Section 3 worker status. Any information that a grantee enters in IDIS or DRGR must have supporting documentation demonstrating the accuracy of the data. (24 CFR part 75). Condition: SC UpLift does not have a written, documented Section 3 policy and procedures guide. However, Section 3 is identified in the activities section of the description of work in the contractual agreement with the contractor. SC UpLift did not maintain a formal written Section 3 Policy and Procedures Guide. However, Section 3 requirements were incorporated into the solicitation and executed construction contract Cause of condition: SC UpLift did not prepare a written Section 3 policy and procedures guide. Potential effect of condition: This appears to be an isolated incident because SC UpLift only had one award agreement under this program assistance listing number. This condition results in a noncompliance finding regarding a written Section 3 policy and procedures guide for the period under audit. Recommendation: We recommend SC UpLift’s Management create a written Section 3 Policies and procedures guide when participating in the above referenced program assistance listing number. Response of responsible SC UpLift official: SC UpLift Community Outreach acknowledges the audit finding and understands that a formal written Section 3 Policy and Procedures Guide should have been established for the CDBG-funded project. Although SC UpLift did not maintain a standalone written Section 3 policy during the audit period, the organization did recognize the applicability of Section 3 requirements during the procurement process. Section 3 provisions were incorporated into the project bid documents and executed construction contract to ensure contractors were aware of the federal requirements. Based on the guidance provided during project implementation, management believed these measures adequately addressed the Section 3 requirements for this project. SC UpLift recognizes that HUD requires recipients and subrecipients to maintain a formal written Section 3 Policy and Procedures Guide regardless of whether separate reporting is requested by the pass-through entity. We accept the finding and are committed to strengthening our compliance procedures. Management will develop and adopt a comprehensive Section 3 Policy and Procedures Guide that establishes procedures for: • documenting Section 3 workers and Targeted Section 3 workers; • monitoring contractor compliance with Section 3 requirements; • maintaining required supporting documentation; • retaining labor hour reports and other required records; and • ensuring compliance with 24 CFR Part 75 for all applicable HUD-funded projects. In addition, SC UpLift will incorporate a federal compliance checklist into its grant administration process to ensure all required HUD policies are adopted prior to the commencement of future projects.
Finding 2024-003 - Segregation of Duties Fiscal Year Finding Initially Occurred: FY 2024 (Initial Finding) Name of Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Award Year: 2021 and 2024 Criteria or specific requirement: Statements on Auditing Standards, Communicating Inter...
Finding 2024-003 - Segregation of Duties Fiscal Year Finding Initially Occurred: FY 2024 (Initial Finding) Name of Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Award Year: 2021 and 2024 Criteria or specific requirement: Statements on Auditing Standards, Communicating Internal Control Related Matters Identified in an Audit, require the auditor to report on whether the Society has appropriate segregation of duties relating to all aspects of its bookkeeping and accounting procedures. Good internal control requires a complete separation of duties with respect to handling and recording transactions No one person should have access to both physical assets and the related accounting records or to all phases of a transaction. Condition: There is an absence of an absolute segregation of duties in the accounting process due primarily to an accounting department that lacks the size and resources to function in an ideal manner that could assist in reducing the likelihood of a material misstatement. Cause of condition: Limited available staff, coupled with the size of the Society, and prohibitive costs currently prevent an absolute segregation of duties. The Society believes the cost far outweighs the perceived benefits. Potential effect of condition: The lack of an absolute segregation of duties weakens the Society's internal control structure's ability to absolutely prevent and/or detect possible misstatements or compliance issues through second-party independent verification for safeguarding of assets, potential material misstatement, and safeguarding of assets within the Society's financial statements. Recommendation: We understand that the added costs of providing an absolute segregation of duties will, in most cases, outweigh the projected benefits of the added controls, and therefore, may be considered unjustified. However, we are obligated by recently adopted auditing standards to bring this condition to the attention of management and the Board. Those charged with governance are obligated to consider the validity of these comments in light of the circumstances surrounding this condition and respond as they consider necessary. Their response may very well entail acceptance and continuance of this condition as the best perceived alternative under the circumstances. Response of responsible SC UpLift Official: Absolute separation of duties is rarely, if ever, seen within small to medium-sized organizations simply because of the lack of a cost-benefit justification for the added segregation of duties. In the absence of absolute segregation of duties, we implore mitigating controls that reduce the likelihood of material misstatement. We believe that the added costs of providing an absolute segregation of duties will far outweigh the projected benefits of the added controls, and therefore, consider it as unjustifiable.
Finding 2024-002 - Preparation of Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Name of Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Award Year: 2021 and 2024 Criteria or specific requirement: Management is required by various regulatory and funding agencies, as well a...
Finding 2024-002 - Preparation of Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Name of Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Award Year: 2021 and 2024 Criteria or specific requirement: Management is required by various regulatory and funding agencies, as well as by due diligence responsibilities to the general-public, to provide a single audit, or if separately, annual audited financial statements, and a program-specific audit (the SEFA). In general, it is management's responsibility to prepare the SEFA, and present it to the auditor. Condition: SC UpLift's management does not internally prepare its own full-disclosure SEFA. Currently the auditor provides significant assistance when preparing the SEFA. Cause of condition: Similar to most small-to-medium sized organizations, SC UpLift lacks the personnel with the accounting expertise and training such as that possessed by a certified public accountant or a chief financial officer of a large organization who customarily and regularly prepares appropriate reporting statements. Potential effect of condition: SC UpLift is dependent upon its external auditor to assist in preparing the SEFA, including footnotes, as part of the audit process. Recommendation: We are obligated by recently adopted auditing standards to bring this condition to the attention of management and the Board. Those charged with governance are obligated to consider the validity of these comments in light of the circumstances surrounding this condition and respond as they consider necessary. Your response may very well entail acceptance and continuance of this condition as the best perceived alternative under the circumstances. Response of Responsible SC UpLift Official: We relied on our auditor to produce the SEFA. Our accounting department is small, and consists of one contracted individual, which makes it difficult. We will continue to evaluate our ability to produce our SEFA, with related footnotes when audits are required.
Finding 2024-001 - Internal Controls Over Accounting and Financial Reporting Fiscal Year Finding Initially Occurred: FY 2024 (Initial Finding) Name of Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Award Year: 2021, 2023, and 2024 Criteria or specific requirement: Under the ...
Finding 2024-001 - Internal Controls Over Accounting and Financial Reporting Fiscal Year Finding Initially Occurred: FY 2024 (Initial Finding) Name of Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Award Year: 2021, 2023, and 2024 Criteria or specific requirement: Under the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200), non-Federal entities that receive Federal awards must maintain an accounting and financial management system that provides adequate internal control, accountability, and reporting. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) require revenues and expenses to be recognized in the period in which they are earned or incurred. Assets, liabilities, and net assets should be accurately recorded and reported as of the applicable reporting date. Organizations should maintain effective controls to ensure proper period-end cutoff and accurate financial reporting. Condition: During our audit, we identified material accounting errors in accounts receivable, equity investments, property and equipment, accumulated depreciation, construction in progress, accounts payable, and the classification of net assets with donor restrictions, where account balances were not recorded, were recorded improperly, or improperly classified. With respect to revenues and expenses, we identified transactions that were recorded in accounting periods other than those in which the underlying economic events occurred. Specifically, some revenues and expenses that should have been reported in the 2023 accounting year were recorded in the 2024 accounting year, Another condition related to this finding is that accounting personnel do not close the books at year-end each year. This condition required SC UpLift's management to engage the services of a third-party Certified Public Accountant (CPA) to correct the underlying accounting records before year-end financial statements could be prepared. The accounting records required approximately 30 adjusting, reclassifying, or correcting journal entries, to get the accounting records ready for financial reporting. Cause of condition: The primary cause of this condition appears to be a lack of skill, knowledge, experience, and training of accounting personnel with respect to GAAP, and governmental bookkeeping, accounting, and financial reporting requirements. A secondary cause of this condition may be a lack of supervisory oversight and review of accounting transactions by a knowledgeable individual. Potential effect of condition: The potential effect of this condition is the possible material misstatement of interim and/or year-end financial reporting. Management may make decisions using inaccurate financial information, which could negatively affect SC Uplift's ability to secure additional funding for its programs. Section II - Financial Statement Findings (continued) Finding 2024-001 - Internal Controls Over Accounting and Financial Reporting (continued) Fiscal Year Finding Initially Occurred: FY 2024 (Initial Finding) Recommendation: We recommend Management strengthen daily accounting, and period-end closing and review procedures to ensure all transactions are recorded in the appropriate accounting period. Recommended actions include: 1. Implementing formal cutoff procedures for revenue, expense, asset, and liability transactions; 2. Strengthening supervisory review and approval of period-end journal entries and reconciliations; 3. Performing timely reconciliations of significant balance sheet accounts; 4. Providing training to accounting personnel regarding period recognition requirements and accounting cutoff principles; and 5. Establishing documented review controls to verify the completeness and accuracy of period-end financial reporting. Response of Responsible SC UpLift Official: Management of SC UpLift Community Outreach, Inc. acknowledges and understands the audit finding regarding financial reporting and year-end accounting procedures. We appreciate the auditor's recommendations and are committed to strengthening our accounting and financial reporting processes to ensure continued compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200), and nonprofit financial reporting standards. As a small nonprofit organization with limited administrative resources, SC UpLift has consistently sought to maintain sound financial management practices by engaging qualified Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) to assist with our accounting and financial reporting. However, due to the financial constraints common among small nonprofit organizations, we have not always been able to retain those services on a continuous basis because of the associated costs. This was SC UpLift's first Single Audit, and we recognize that the increased reporting requirements associated with federal funding require additional expertise, stronger internal controls, and more formalized year-end closing procedures. We have already engaged a third-party CPA to assist with the preparation of the 2024 audited financial statements and will continue working closely with both our bookkeeper and CPA throughout the upcoming fiscal year to improve our financial reporting processes. Specifically, management will: • Develop and implement formal month-end and year-end closing procedures. • Perform timely reconciliations of all significant balance sheet accounts. • Strengthen supervisory review of journal entries, reconciliations, and financial reports. • Ensure revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities are recorded in the proper accounting period. • Continue utilizing the expertise of our third-party CPA to review financial records, provide guidance on GAAP compliance, and assist with staff training and implementation of best practices. Management believes these corrective actions will significantly strengthen our internal controls over financial reporting and reduce the likelihood of similar findings in future audits. We are committed to continuous improvement and maintaining financial records that accurately reflect the organization's financial position while meeting all applicable federal and nonprofit reporting requirements. Target Completion Date: December 31, 2026
Criteria: Section 3.5 of the Grant Agreement, Federal Labor Standards Compliance, requires the subrecipient to ensure compliance with all applicable labor standards for federally funded construction activities. Specifically, contracts exceeding $2,000 for construction, alteration, repair, painting, ...
Criteria: Section 3.5 of the Grant Agreement, Federal Labor Standards Compliance, requires the subrecipient to ensure compliance with all applicable labor standards for federally funded construction activities. Specifically, contracts exceeding $2,000 for construction, alteration, repair, painting, or decorating of a public building or public work financed in whole or in part with federal funds must include the labor standards provisions required by 29 CFR Part 5.5, including prevailing wage requirements. Condition: The subrecipient did not ensure that applicable construction contracts contained the required federal labor standards provisions, including prevailing wage requirements and the contract clauses prescribed by 29 CFR Part 5.5. No prevailing wage determinations were obtained or payroll records maintained, Cause: Management did not establish adequate procedures to review federally funded construction contracts for compliance with federal labor standards requirements before execution. Effect: Failure to include the required labor standards provisions may result in noncompliance with federal grant requirements, expose workers to improper wage practices, and increase the risk of questioned costs, repayment of grant funds, or other federal sanctions. Recommendation: We recommend Management implement procedures to identify all federally funded construction contracts subject to prevailing wage requirements and ensure that required labor standards provisions, including those contained in 29 CFR Part 5.5, are incorporated into all applicable contracts before work begins. Management Response: SC UpLift Community Outreach, Inc. acknowledges the audit finding and understands the importance of ensuring compliance with all applicable federal labor standards and grant requirements. At the inception of the Richland County Home Repair Project for Seniors, SC UpLift participated in an orientation conducted by the consulting firm retained by Richland County to administer and oversee the ARPA-funded program. During that orientation, SC UpLift was provided guidance regarding program administration, reporting requirements, and the monthly Subrecipient Reports that were required throughout the grant period. Based on the information and technical assistance provided during program implementation, management believed that prevailing wage requirements were applicable primarily to larger federally funded construction projects and was not aware that prevailing wage monitoring requirements applied to this program. At no time during the grant period was prevailing wage documentation requested or identified as a compliance concern during the monthly reporting process. While this context explains management's understanding, SC UpLift recognizes that ultimate responsibility for complying with all grant requirements rests with the organization. We accept the finding and are committed to strengthening our compliance procedures. To address this finding, SC UpLift will implement the following corrective actions: • Develop written policies and procedures to identify federal labor standards and prevailing wage requirements before the execution of any federally funded construction or rehabilitation contracts. • Review all federal and pass-through award agreements at the beginning of each grant to identify all applicable compliance requirements. • Incorporate a grant compliance checklist that includes prevailing wage determinations, when applicable, before projects are initiated. • Consult with our third-party CPA and grant management professionals, as necessary, to ensure compliance with federal labor standards and other grant requirements. • Provide additional training to management and program staff regarding federal grant compliance requirements, including prevailing wage regulations. Management is committed to strengthening its internal controls and compliance monitoring processes to ensure all applicable federal requirements are identified and implemented for future federally funded projects.
Management has enhanced controls over FEMA grant compliance by strengthening the formal review process to verify that costs claimed are eligible, adequately supported, and consistent with FEMA program requirements prior to submission, including the removal of any duplicates.
Management has enhanced controls over FEMA grant compliance by strengthening the formal review process to verify that costs claimed are eligible, adequately supported, and consistent with FEMA program requirements prior to submission, including the removal of any duplicates.
Management has strengthened controls over SEFA preparation by implementing procedures to identify federal awards with unique reporting requirements, including FEMA grants. A formal review process and year-end reconciliation of federal expenditures to the SEFA will be performed to ensure expenditures...
Management has strengthened controls over SEFA preparation by implementing procedures to identify federal awards with unique reporting requirements, including FEMA grants. A formal review process and year-end reconciliation of federal expenditures to the SEFA will be performed to ensure expenditures are reported completely and accurately in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements.
The grant accounting and SEFA preparation process will be refined, improved and documented. Internal resources will be reallocated to ensure sufficient coverage of these processes, and the primary accountability and oversight will shift to System Accounting. Management will ensure that in preparatio...
The grant accounting and SEFA preparation process will be refined, improved and documented. Internal resources will be reallocated to ensure sufficient coverage of these processes, and the primary accountability and oversight will shift to System Accounting. Management will ensure that in preparation of the SEFA, (1) a team member will assemble the initial reconciliation, (2) management will review the initial reconciliation and review the consolidation from all BayCare entities to the combined SEFA, (3) A final review will be conducted by the Director of Accounting. Sign-off from each preparer/reviewer shall be required. Meetings will be conducted as needed with departments outside of Hospital Finance to ensure completeness and accuracy of data.
Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Lauren Moberg, Executive Director Corrective Actions Planned: The Organization will take steps to maintain support of personnel charges based on actual results including timesheets indicating the amounts charged reflect actual staff time spen...
Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Lauren Moberg, Executive Director Corrective Actions Planned: The Organization will take steps to maintain support of personnel charges based on actual results including timesheets indicating the amounts charged reflect actual staff time spent on the program. The Organization will also take the necessary steps to ensure that grant expenditure billing reports reflect actual program expenses supported by the general ledger and agree to actual amounts charged to the program. Anticipated Completion Date: These procedures are already in the process of being implemented and will be fully implemented by the end of 2026.
Recommendation: Management should revise its written procurement policy to conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards applicable to federal awards. Corrective action planned: The Organization will add a section to its procurement policy that applies specifically when a federal award is in...
Recommendation: Management should revise its written procurement policy to conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards applicable to federal awards. Corrective action planned: The Organization will add a section to its procurement policy that applies specifically when a federal award is involved in the procurement. Persons responsible for corrective action: Justin Queen, Executive Director Date by which the corrective action will be completed: December 2026
« 1 398 399 401 402 2342 »