Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
64,113
In database
Filtered Results
60,361
Matching current filters
Showing Page
124 of 2415
25 per page

Filters

Clear
The School has contacted DESE for guidance regarding this matter and has implemented proper controls over Title One program expenditures.
The School has contacted DESE for guidance regarding this matter and has implemented proper controls over Title One program expenditures.
The School has made personnel and policy changes and has also been in contact with DESE for guidance. The School has since made coding corrections and implemented proper controls over program expenditures.
The School has made personnel and policy changes and has also been in contact with DESE for guidance. The School has since made coding corrections and implemented proper controls over program expenditures.
Criteria In accordance with 31 CFR Sections 35.4(c), the Town should provide an annual report detailing the accounting for the use of the federal award program funds. In addition, the report should be completed and submitted by April 30th of the folllowing year. Condition The Town's annual report di...
Criteria In accordance with 31 CFR Sections 35.4(c), the Town should provide an annual report detailing the accounting for the use of the federal award program funds. In addition, the report should be completed and submitted by April 30th of the folllowing year. Condition The Town's annual report did not reconcile with the amounts recorded in its general ledger. Cause The Town does not have adequate controls and procedures over reporting. Effect The Town's annual report did not reconcile to the total amount expended. Recommendation The Town should review their established policies and procedures and make any necessary changes to ensure an effective control environment. Management's Corrective Action Plan The Town will review their established policies and procedures and make any necessary changes to ensure an effective control environment.
Criteria In accordance with 31 CFR Sections 35.4(c), the Town should provide an annual report detailing the accounting for the use of the federal award program funds. In addition, the report should be completed and submitted by April 30th of the folllowing year. Condition The Town's annual report di...
Criteria In accordance with 31 CFR Sections 35.4(c), the Town should provide an annual report detailing the accounting for the use of the federal award program funds. In addition, the report should be completed and submitted by April 30th of the folllowing year. Condition The Town's annual report did not reconcile with the amounts recorded in its general ledger. Cause The Town does not have adequate controls and procedures over reporting. Effect The Town's annual report did not reconcile to the total amount expended. Recommendation The Town should review their established policies and procedures and make any necessary changes to ensure an effective control environment. Management's Corrective Action Plan The Town will review their established policies and procedures and make any necessary changes to ensure an effective control environment.
Department of Health and Human Services: ParkTree Community Health Center (PCHC) respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2025. Audit period: 01/1/25 – 12/31/25 The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The f...
Department of Health and Human Services: ParkTree Community Health Center (PCHC) respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2025. Audit period: 01/1/25 – 12/31/25 The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS—FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS Department of Health and Human Services 2025-01 Health Center Cluster– Assistance Listing No. 93.HCP Recommendation: CLA recommends that PCHC implement a second-level, independent review of demographic data and income verification information entered into the patient billing system to help ensure each patient’s sliding fee classification and corresponding discount is accurate. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action Plan: ParkTree Community Health Center will implement a second-level independent review process for all new Sliding Fee Discount Program (SFDP) applications and annual renewals. Under this process, demographic information, household income documentation, family size, and the assigned sliding fee classification will be independently verified by a designated supervisor or other qualified staff member before the sliding fee discount is finalized in NextGen. Front desk receptionists and enrollment staff receive ongoing training and best practice reminders to ensure that all SFDP applications and supporting documentation are completed accurately and in a timely manner. Management has also implemented a weekly internal review process to verify that applications are complete, that appropriate supporting documentation is retained in each patient's file, and that assigned sliding fee classifications are accurate and consistent with PCHC's Board-approved SFDP policies and procedures. In addition, periodic quality assurance reviews will continue to be conducted to monitor compliance, identify trends, and provide corrective coaching when discrepancies are identified. These enhanced controls are designed to strengthen internal controls, improve compliance with the SFDP, and help ensure that each patient's sliding fee classification and corresponding discount are accurately applied in NextGen. Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Alfonso Aguilera Planned Completion Date: December 31, 2026 If the U.S Department of Health and Human Services has any questions regarding this Corrective Action Plan, please contact Alfonso Aguilera at (909)-865-9501, Ext. 3970.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: (Prepared by Cooperative Management) 2025 -002 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls When the Cooperative completed the Essential Elements of Information (EEI) Worksheet, they excluded amounts billed to the Cooperative for mutual...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: (Prepared by Cooperative Management) 2025 -002 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls When the Cooperative completed the Essential Elements of Information (EEI) Worksheet, they excluded amounts billed to the Cooperative for mutual aid help that was performed in an area that was not included in the declared area on the same invoice as work performed in the declared area. On September 25, 2024, the Cooperative sent an email to the FEMA representative with a reconciliation worksheet attached to the email showing the difference between the amounts listed on the mutual aid invoices and the amount reported by the Cooperative on the EEI Worksheet for mutual aid because the FEMA representative could not tie the invoice amounts to the amount reported on the EEI Worksheet. Notation of the amount to be excluded, $11,746, and why it should be excluded was documented on the reconciliation worksheet that was attached to the email. It was the FEMA representative that ultimately included an amount in the final submission that the Cooperative did not include in the EEI Worksheet and clearly communicated should not be included. In the future the Cooperative will verify all final numbers that the FEMA representative intends to report to the CRC. In December 2025, when the Cooperative was reviewing a work order for damage that happened in Colorado during the same storm that was the declared event, it was discovered that $2,294 in retirement costs performed by a contractor was accidentally included in the FEMA claim. In May 2024 when the contractor invoice was received and paid, it was accidentally coded as 100% Nebraska when 3.5% of the invoice should have been coded as Colorado retirement. In the future the Cooperative will have a better review process to catch any accidental coding errors. The Cooperative acknowledges that a total of $14,040 in costs were included when they should not have been.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: (Prepared by Cooperative Management) 2025 -001 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls The electronic timesheet system used by the Cooperative, which is also used to track vehicle and equipment used by an employee only allows track...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: (Prepared by Cooperative Management) 2025 -001 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls The electronic timesheet system used by the Cooperative, which is also used to track vehicle and equipment used by an employee only allows tracking of vehicle/equipment by mileage and/or hour usage, since the trailers owned by the Cooperative do not have a meter to track either mileage and/or hour usage it is not normal business practice to track the trailer usage on the timesheets. There is a comment section on the timesheet where the information can be entered to bypass the system requirement of entering mileage and/or hour usage, in future storm situations, trailer usage will be entered into the comment section of the timesheet. As for the ATV’s and loader/skid steer equipment it is not normal practice to enter those on the timesheet even though they have a meter to track miles and/or hours. In future storm situations, usage for such equipment will be tracked on the timesheet. The basis for including the trailers in question even though they were not tracked on timesheets was that the trailers were used to haul material (poles) that were checked out of inventory. The Cooperative had to change out over 500 poles, the poles had to be hauled at least 45 miles from the Cooperative inventory yard to the job site, the trailers are pulled by specific trucks which the usage of the trucks was documented on timesheets. The trailers were loaded with the poles in the morning, pulled to job site, a pole unloaded at each pole location, returned in the evening when the shift of the employee driving the truck that pulled the trailer was over. Between inventory records and timesheets documenting the trucks pulling the trailers, the Cooperative was able to determine when the trailers were used. The operations manager made note every day of the ATV’s and loader/skid steers that were used and by which employee. That equipment had to be hauled to the job sites which were at least 45 miles away from the office where they are normally kept. The equipment was pulled to the job sites with the assigned trailer (dump trailers) for that equipment in the morning and returned in evening when the employees shift was over. The FEMA representative the Cooperative worked with wanted the force equipment usage in excel format, the directive given to the Cooperative by the FEMA representative was to add the trailers, ATV’s, loader/skid steers to the excel spreadsheet based upon the documentation that was kept by the operations manager, the inventory records and timesheets. The FEMA representative gave the advice that the handwritten documents did not need to be kept once it was added to the excel spreadsheet since that was the document submitted to the FEMA representative, not the timesheets. In future storm situations all handwritten documents will be scanned as a pdf document and electronically kept.
June29,2026 Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit David Raines Community Health Center, lnc. respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 3I,2026. Name and address of independent public accounting firm AAFCPAS, lnc. 50 Washington Street Westborough, MA 0158...
June29,2026 Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit David Raines Community Health Center, lnc. respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 3I,2026. Name and address of independent public accounting firm AAFCPAS, lnc. 50 Washington Street Westborough, MA 01581 Audit period: January L,2025 - December 3L,2025 The findings from June 29,2026, schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT FINDINGS NONE FINDINGS-FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 2025-001 Federal Progrom Identification: Health Center Program Cluster: ALN 93.224/93.527 Health Center Program and Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program Recommendation: Management should establish and implement procedures to ensure Federal drawdowns are based on actual, allowable expenditures or immediate cash needs in accordance with 2 CFR 5200'305' Draw requests should be reviewed and approved to verify that amounts requested do not exceed current allowable expenditures or immediate cash requirements. Action Taken: Management concurs with the finding(s). During the period under audit, the organization inadvertently did a duplicative Federal drawdown which was an-administrative oversight. To address this deficiency and prevent future occurrences, management has implemented the following corrective actions: Duplicate Prevention Controls: Management has instituted a centralized drawdown tracking log to cross-reference and reconcile historical requests against immediate cash needs, eliminating the risk of administrative duplication. Management expects to have the above completed by Fully lmplemented (as of April 2026) lf the Department of Health and Human Services has questions regarding this plan, please call Angela Chatman at 318-440-L9L8. Sincerely yours, Angela Chatman Chief Financial Officer
Finding Type: Material Weakness in Compliance and Internal Control over Compliance Finding No. 2025-01 Recommendation: Management should implement procedures to ensure an accurate schedule of expenditures of federal awards with a corresponding reconciliation to the accrual basis trial balance. It is...
Finding Type: Material Weakness in Compliance and Internal Control over Compliance Finding No. 2025-01 Recommendation: Management should implement procedures to ensure an accurate schedule of expenditures of federal awards with a corresponding reconciliation to the accrual basis trial balance. It is recommended that management establish and enforce review and approval procedures related to the schedule of expenditures of federal awards and the accrual basis trial balance. Responsible Official: David M. Holder, Chairman Corrective Action Plan: The County acknowledges the importance regarding the accuracy of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards and corresponding reconciliation to the accrual basis trial balance. The County is considering providing additional training for current personnel along with the employment of additional personnel with suitable knowledge, skills, and experience to fulfill the fund-based accounting duties and other fiscal duties of the Treasurer’s office. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Fiscal year 2026
Finding #2025-001- Material Audit Adjustments Condition: The auditor proposed adjusting journal entries during the audit process to adjust City account balances. We deem these entries to be significant in relation to the financial statements. Since the City did not make these adjustments in its acco...
Finding #2025-001- Material Audit Adjustments Condition: The auditor proposed adjusting journal entries during the audit process to adjust City account balances. We deem these entries to be significant in relation to the financial statements. Since the City did not make these adjustments in its accounting system prior to the audit, a material weakness was determined to exist in the City’s internal controls. Effect: Financial reports generated by the accounting system may not provide an accurate reflection of the City’s financial position or activities. Cause: Financial information was not recorded in a timely manner and numerous adjustments were needed in order to correct account balances. Criteria: Material adjusting journal entries not prepared by the City before the audit are considered an internal control weakness. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be implemented to ensure account balances are properly recorded in a timely manner. Response: The City will establish policies and procedures to reduce the number of adjusting journal entries proposed by the auditor in future years. Contact Person: David Kurihara, Clerk/Treasurer Anticipated Completion: Summer 2026
Finding Number: 2025-001 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Corrective Action Plan In March 2026, following the recognition of the issue, APS immediately conducted a comprehensive review of all payroll related charges, and promptly corrected t...
Finding Number: 2025-001 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Corrective Action Plan In March 2026, following the recognition of the issue, APS immediately conducted a comprehensive review of all payroll related charges, and promptly corrected the accounting records and updated the SEFA to remove all duplicated costs. In response to this finding, APS implemented additional policies, procedures, and controls to strengthen oversight of payroll processing and grant expenditure reporting. Specifically, APS established a documented review process to identify and investigate duplicate payroll postings prior to and following the upload of payroll data to the general ledger and grant accounting records. In addition, APS enhanced its system change management procedures to ensure that future modifications or upgrades to payroll and grants management systems include validation testing of key controls before implementation. APS will continue to review payroll charges and grant expenditures regularly and maintain documentation of all review and reconciliation activities to ensure costs charged to federal awards are accurate, allowable, properly supported, and recorded only once. APS implemented the corrective action plan on April 30, 2026. Management's contact responsible for the implementation of the Corrective Action Plan: Name: Jane Hopkins Gould Position: Chief Financial & Operating Officer Telephone number: 301-209-3276
Finding Number: 2025-002 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Corrective Action Plan APS acknowledges the finding and has reviewed its procedures related to NSF prior-approval requirements for post-award subawards. In the instances identified, the subawards were not identified at the prop...
Finding Number: 2025-002 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Corrective Action Plan APS acknowledges the finding and has reviewed its procedures related to NSF prior-approval requirements for post-award subawards. In the instances identified, the subawards were not identified at the proposal stage and arose after the NSF award had already been issued. APS notes that the NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) does not explicitly state that grantees must obtain separate prior written approval for post-award subawards that were not identified in the original proposal. As a result, APS personnel did not recognize that additional NSF authorization was required under these circumstances. APS has strengthened its grant administration procedures to ensure compliance with sponsor requirements. APS has implemented additional review procedures requiring grant administration personnel and Principal Investigators to assess prior-approval requirements before executing any post-award subaward. APS will document this review and, when required, obtain and retain written sponsor authorization prior to issuing a subaward. In addition, APS has enhanced training for grants management personnel regarding NSF award administration requirements and will maintain documentation evidencing compliance with all applicable prior-approval requirements. APS will continue to monitor subaward activity throughout the life of each award to ensure that sponsor approvals are obtained and retained timely and that all federal award requirements are met. APS will implement the corrective action plan on August 31, 2026. Management's contact responsible for the implementation of the Corrective Action Plan: Name: Jane Hopkins Gould Position: Chief Financial & Operating Officer Telephone number: 301-209-3276
Finding #2025-001 – Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) and Audit Adjustments Responsible Individuals: Mike Walker (CEO) and Kathleen Burnham (Accountant) Corrective Action Plan: It is more cost effective for the Organization to hire...
Finding #2025-001 – Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) and Audit Adjustments Responsible Individuals: Mike Walker (CEO) and Kathleen Burnham (Accountant) Corrective Action Plan: It is more cost effective for the Organization to hire Ketel Thorstenson, LLP, a public accounting firm, to prepare the full disclosure consolidated financial statements as a part of the annual audit process. Management of the Organization has reviewed the consolidated financial statements and SEFA prepared by Ketel Thorstnson, LLP. The consolidated financial statements and SEFA have been compared and reconciled to the internal records maintained by the Organization. Management and the board of directors have been given adequate opportunity to ask questions regarding the consolidated financial statements and note disclosures and have received sufficient response from the auditors prior to final publication of the audited consolidated financial statements and SEFA. Management is satisfied that appropriate actions have been taken to allow them to take responsibility for the consolidated financial statements. Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing
WMMHC issued additional review procedures for grant expenditures to all WMMHC employees on July 27, 2026, to ensure timely filing and compliance with federal requirements.
WMMHC issued additional review procedures for grant expenditures to all WMMHC employees on July 27, 2026, to ensure timely filing and compliance with federal requirements.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2025-001 Inadequate Internal Controls Over Monthly Grant Billings and Allowable Costs Recommendation: Monthly grant billings should be prepared by the CEO and reviewed by the Director of Operations prior to submission. This will establish segregation of duties and reduce the r...
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2025-001 Inadequate Internal Controls Over Monthly Grant Billings and Allowable Costs Recommendation: Monthly grant billings should be prepared by the CEO and reviewed by the Director of Operations prior to submission. This will establish segregation of duties and reduce the risk of billing errors. In addition, management should implement a quarterly oversight review by the board to confirm that allowable cost requirements are being followed. The Manchester Community Resource Center, Inc recognizes that during the 28 years of operation, this is the first audit finding for the agency. The total overbilling was less than 3% of the overall contract. The agency acknowledges the overbilling resulted from inadequate internal controls over the invoicing process. Specifically, the existing procedures does not define the segregation of duties. Management review controls were not adequate to identify billing errors before invoices were sent to the contracting agency. Corrective Actions: The organization has taken immediate and long-term corrective actions to address this finding and strengthen its financial management system. Immediate Actions: • Management will conduct a comprehensive review of all invoices submitted under the affected contract to identify any additional discrepancies. • Immediately following the completion of the financial audit, the contracting agency will be notified of the error, and arrangements will be made to reimburse the overpayment. • Staff responsible for contract billing received immediate instruction regarding allowable costs, billing requirements, and contract compliance. Internal Control Improvements: The Board of Directors will work with management to review and revise the organization's written financial policies and internal controls related to contract billing. Revised procedures will include: • A standardized invoice preparation checklist. • Verification that all billed costs are supported by accounting records and source documentation. • A reconciliation of invoices to the general ledger and contract budget before submission. • Documentation of all calculations supporting each invoice. • Written supervisory approval of every invoice prior to submission. Maintain a grant billing file containing all supporting documentation for each invoice. • Have the finance committee review federal grant billing as part of its regular meetings. Segregation of Duties: To the greatest extent possible, billing responsibilities will be separated among multiple individuals. The employee preparing the invoice will not be the sole individual responsible for reviewing and approving the invoice prior to submission. When staffing limitations prevent full segregation of duties, an independent management review will be documented. Management Oversight: The Chief Executive Officer will prepare all invoice packets that will include supporting documentation. The Director of Operations will perform and document a secondary review of each invoice before it is submitted to the funding agency. This review will verify: • Mathematical accuracy. • Compliance with contract requirements. • Accuracy of supporting documentation. • Proper allocation of costs. • Consistency with the approved budget and contract terms. Board Oversight: The Board of Directors will enhance its financial oversight by: • Reviewing, revising, and approving the financial policies and internal controls. • Receiving periodic reports regarding grant and contract billing compliance. • Reviewing the results of any internal monitoring activities and ensuring corrective actions remain effective. Staff Training All employees involved in grant administration, accounting, payroll allocation, and invoicing will receive annual training on: • Federal grant requirements. • Uniform Guidance financial management requirements. • Contract-specific billing procedures. • Internal control responsibilities. • Documentation standards. Training will also be provided whenever significant changes occur in funding requirements or internal procedures. Ongoing Monitoring: Management will implement quarterly internal compliance reviews of a sample of invoices to verify adherence to the revised procedures. Any deficiencies identified will be corrected immediately, and additional staff training will be provided as needed. The organization will also conduct an annual review of its financial policies and internal controls to ensure they remain effective and compliant with applicable federal requirements. Ongoing Responsible Parties: • Chief Executive Officer • Director of Operations • Board Treasurer • Board of Directors Expected Completion Date: The revised policies, staff training, and implementation of the new internal control procedures will be completed within 90 days of the audit report issuance. Ongoing monitoring and Board oversight will continue thereafter. The contracting agency will be notified of overbilling and arrangements for reimbursement will be completed immediately upon the filing of the annual financial audit.
See Corrective Action Plan table/chart.
See Corrective Action Plan table/chart.
See Corrective Action Plan table/chart.
See Corrective Action Plan table/chart.
See Corrective Action Plan table/chart.
See Corrective Action Plan table/chart.
See Corrective Action Plan table/chart.
See Corrective Action Plan table/chart.
See Corrective Action Plan table/chart.
See Corrective Action Plan table/chart.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Current staff and new staff will be trained on the importance of keeping accurate records. A checklist will be developed for quarterly internal audits to cross-verify names between applications and attendance records, plus other applicab...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Current staff and new staff will be trained on the importance of keeping accurate records. A checklist will be developed for quarterly internal audits to cross-verify names between applications and attendance records, plus other applicable records. If discrepancies are identified in the internal audits, they will be corrected promptly.
Submission of Required Forms Condition - During the audit, we noted that the HUD-53001 form was not completed or filed with HUD as required. Cause - The Authority thought this was already submitted for the grant years, but there was Miscommunication Plan of Action - The Housing Authority will implem...
Submission of Required Forms Condition - During the audit, we noted that the HUD-53001 form was not completed or filed with HUD as required. Cause - The Authority thought this was already submitted for the grant years, but there was Miscommunication Plan of Action - The Housing Authority will implement procedures to ensure compliance with the above regulations as it relates to all federal awards. Person Responsible: Ms. Rosemary Steele (Executive Director) Period of Action: The review will ensure compliance with the above regulations as it relates to all federal awards. If you have any further questions, please advise.
Condition: The City did not maintain risk assessments to evaluate each subrecipients risk of noncompliance and level of monitoring required and did not maintain any documentation indicating that monitoring occurred for five subrecipients. Corrective Action Planned: Management agrees with the finding...
Condition: The City did not maintain risk assessments to evaluate each subrecipients risk of noncompliance and level of monitoring required and did not maintain any documentation indicating that monitoring occurred for five subrecipients. Corrective Action Planned: Management agrees with the finding. Although staffing changes affected overall grant oversight, responsibility for monitoring these subrecipients had been assigned; however, the required risk assessments and monitoring activities were not completed or documented. The city has clarified responsibility for subrecipient oversight and will require documented risk assessments, monitoring procedures, and supervisory review for all future federal subawards. Anticipated Completion Date: June 2027 Contact: Alex Koppelman, Community Development Director
Auditor's Recommendation: Strengthen controls over eligibility determinations by requiring Program Managers to document and retain evidence of review and approval of all intake forms/applications before services are provided. Management should also implement periodic monitoring procedures to ensure ...
Auditor's Recommendation: Strengthen controls over eligibility determinations by requiring Program Managers to document and retain evidence of review and approval of all intake forms/applications before services are provided. Management should also implement periodic monitoring procedures to ensure review approvals are consistently documented and maintained for audit purposes. Management Response: ODI is diligent in understanding and implementing the steps necessary to review and collect the required documentation to determine client eligibility for programs. Due to the large number of clients serviced and the volume of documents collected and reviewed, many of the programs track eligibility via proprietary on line portals provided by the funders to capture and document the steps performed to determine eligibility. These portals automatically determine whether a client is eligible based on the information provided. The Program Managers see the client eligibility on the portal when they assign caseworkers to the clients, but there is no formal Program Manager signature provided or captured in the portal. Corrective Action: • Regarding the specific program 90ZQ(l}011-01-0 Support for Trauma-Affected Refugees (STAR} referenced in this finding, client eligibility is determined by requirements established by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR} that apply to other programs administered by ODI. To address the auditor's recommendation regarding this program, ODI will set up a procedure to review and retain documentation for clients entering the STAR program or who were referred from other ORR programs showing they are eligible to receive the STAR services. •Regarding the specific program ALSP23-0001 Afghan Legal Services Project (ALSP}, ODI has serviced, and is still servicing, approximately 500 clients. Although ODI asserts that it has and retains the documentation to demonstrate client eligibility for this program, to address the auditor's recommendation, ODI will set up a procedure to track and document that the program manager will approve. Responsible Personnel: Mao Vang, Health & SOT Program Director; Alyssa Eckels, ILS Program Director Implementation Date: Immediate implementation
Auditor's Recommendation: Strengthen controls over reporting by implementing formal procedures to (1} document and retain evidence of supervisory review and approval, (2) maintain copies of all submitted reports and supporting documentation in a centralized location, and (3) establish monitoring pro...
Auditor's Recommendation: Strengthen controls over reporting by implementing formal procedures to (1} document and retain evidence of supervisory review and approval, (2) maintain copies of all submitted reports and supporting documentation in a centralized location, and (3) establish monitoring procedures to ensure reports are submitted timely and submission evidence is retained for audit purposes. Management Response: While the findings do not result in any questioned costs, ODI does not disagree and appreciates the recommendation. Corrective Action: These findings are largely a result of staff turnover. In addition to the auditor's recommendations above, ODI will implement a plan to cross-train staff and prepare desk procedures to document the steps required to prepare, review, submit, and retain the reports. Responsible Personnel: Mark Dawson, COO Implementation Date: Immediate implementation
« 1 122 123 125 126 2415 »