Corrective Action Plans

Program: Summer Food Service Program CFDA: 10.559 Finding Type: Noncompliance / Significant Deficiency Issue: Purchases from two food vendors exceeded the micro-purchase threshold without documented price comparisons or quotations. Management's Response: Response: Management acknowledges the importance of adhering to federal procurement standards, including the requirement for competitive pricing and documentation for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Corrective Action Taken: Staff involved in procurement have been trained on 2 CFR 200.318-200.326 to ensure understanding of federal procurement requirements. A procurement forecast is now developed at the beginning of each grant cycle to identify vendors likely to exceed the micro-purchase threshold. . For all vendors expected to exceed $10,000 in purchases, the YMCA will obtain and retain at least three price comparisons or quotations. A procurement checklist and documentation log have been implemented to ensure compliance and audit readiness. Responsible Individuals: Karrie Stanford and Gina Franklin Completion Date: Plan has been implemented as of the date of audit submission.

District has been in discussion with our attorney and have already got a new ordinance written and put into effect as of June 1, 2025. CVDWSD currently has a procurement policy as a ordinance.

2024 – 009 Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Federal Agency: Department of Interior Federal Program Title: Outdoor Recreation Acquisition, Development and Planning ALN: 15.916 Pass-Through Agency: Arizona State Park Trails Pass-Through Number(s): 04-007-652304 Award Number and Period: 04/18/2022-12/31/24 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Condition/Context: There was no support provided for the three out of three contractor vendors with construction work noted on their purchase orders to support compliance with Davis Bacon. Corrective Action Plan: Regarding the wage tests for the Park’s grant, no information was provided to the City from the contractor of employee wages paid by the contractor. An email request and answer from the contractor was forwarded to the auditors, that the contractor was not responsible to report the wages. This in the future will be part of the Grants Coordinator position for Internal Control purposes, to ensure that any future construction contracts include the wage reporting requirements. Anticipated completion date: December 2025 Contact Person: Mr. Joel Kramer, City Manager

Finding Number: 2024-001 Recommendation: Create a procurement policy that meets the requirements detailed in 2 CFR 200.318– 200.327 Action Taken: AANA will implement a new Procurement Policy as it relates to purchases and grants supported by the MAST program. See document “MAST Procurement Policy” Responsible Contact Person for Planned Corrective Action: Dennis Siena Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2025

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and will adopt a formal Federal procurement policy which includes all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626.

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and will adopt a formal Federal procurement policy which includes all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626.

Finding 2024-003 – Material Weakness Award No.: AL No. 15.555 and AL No. 15.074 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. AL No. 15.074 Passed-through the Del Puerto Water District. Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. Condition: The following conditions were noted during the single audit: • The District was not able to provide evidence that procurements for the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project and Poso Canal Bridge Replacement Project design contractors under AL 15.555 met the requirements for adequate price competition and was unable to provide documentation confirming the sole-source solicitations met the requirements of Uniform Guidance. Specifically the District was unable to provide evidence it received enough statements of qualification to have adequate price competition or complied with one or more provisions of Section 200.210(c) that allows a sole source agreement to occur. It would appear the District would need evidence that the grantor approved the sole source procurement, but was not able to provide documentation of approvals of sole source procurements by the grantors. The District also was unable to provide documentation of the advertisement of the solicitation of requests for qualifications for the Fish Screen and Control Structure Project. • The District was not able to provide adequate documentation that the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project contract under AL 15.555 and Orestimba Creek Recharge and Recovery Expansion Project contract under AL 15.074 complied with Section 200.327 and appendix II to this part requiring federal contract provisions to be included in the approved contract. This resulted in the District not having evidence that the contractor certified it was in compliance with all required federal provisions. Criteria: Uniform Guidance states the following: • Section 200.318(i) states that “The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractors selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” • Section 300.320(c) states “There are specific circumstances in which the recipient or subrecipient may use a noncompetitive procurement method. The noncompetitive procurement method may only be used if one of the following circumstances applies: (1) The aggregate amount of the procurement transaction does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The procurement transaction can only be fulfilled by a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from providing public notice of a competitive solicitation; (4) The recipient or subrecipient requests in writing to use a noncompetitive procurement method, and the Federal agency or pass-through entity provides written approval; or (5) After soliciting several sources, competition is determined inadequate. • The provisions of the Brooks Act (49 United State Code, Section 1104) require local agencies to award federally funded engineering and design related contracts, otherwise know as A&E contracts, on the basis of fair and open competitive negotiations, demonstrated competence, and professional qualifications (23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 172) at a fair and reasonable price (48 CFR 31.201-3). Both federal regulation and California state law (Government Code 4525-4529 et a) require selection of A&E consultant services on the basis of demonstrated competence and professional qualifications. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be used only when the award of a contract is infeasible under small purchase procedures, sealed bids or competitive proposals, as cited above. • Section 200.327 states “The non-federal entity’s contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in appendix II to this part.” Appendix II contains requirements to include in federally funded contracts termination for cause and convenience provisions, Equal Employment Opportunity provisions, Davis-Bacon Act provisions, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act provisions, Clean Air Act provisions, debarment and suspension provisions, Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment provisions, and other provisions, as applicable. Cause: The current staff was not able to find procurement documentation prepared before they were hired. Effect: The District was unable to provide evidence that it was in compliance with the requirement to maintain documentation indicating the procurement was in compliance with Uniform Guidance Sections 200.318 to 200.327 and appendix II to this part. Context: The original procurement for the consulting firm for the Mendota Pool Fish Screens and Control Structure project was performed in September 2018 and awarded in late October 2018. This procurement precedes the current staff. Staff indicated the grantor approved the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project sole source procurement and the Board Resolution approving the agreement indicated the grantor approved the sole source procurement, but staff was not able to provide proof of written approval by the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend management implement additional controls over the procurement process that ensures each procurement complies with Uniform Guidance Section 200.318 to 200.326, including training of staff working on procurements of the documentation retention and other requirements under the Uniform Guidance. We further recommend the District establish a procurement folder on its server with subfolder for each individual procurement where documentation of each procurement is maintained, including advertising of the procurement, requests for proposals/qualifications with language that satisfies Uniform Guidance requirements, proposals received, executed contracts, certifications of compliance with federal contracting provisions by the contractor if not part of the proposal or executed contracts, documented quantitative and qualitative analysis indicating why the recommended bid was selected for approval, management report to board recommending which bid should be approved, board resolution approving the winning bid and for contracts under $250,000 a memo or form documenting bids received and reason for selecting the bid, including reasons for not selecting the lowest bid if applicable. If a sole source procurement method is used, documentation showing the sole source procurement is allowable under criteria listed in Section 300.320(c) should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will keep procurement folders on each procurement in the future that includes the confirmation in the recommendation and will consult with Reclamation on whether a contract amendment is necessary to document the federal contract. Estimated Completion Date of Corrective Action: Future procurement projects

The Purchasing Director for the City-Parish has the authority as provided by the Code of Ordinances to approve emergency purchases upon review of the certification of the emergency by the user department. At the beginning of 2024, the Baton Rouge Police Department noted its patrol units were in less than standard conditions and a recent Police Academy graduating class of sworn officers compounded the need for viable units. At the same time, a nationwide supply chain crisis limited the availability of vehicles for purchase. Multiple quote requests from vendors across Louisiana confirmed a lack of available inventory including the Louisiana State Contract vendor as well as a piggyback contract for the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office. After an exhaustive search, a single vendor was located who had an inventory of matching vehicles on hand for offer within a limited time frame. In an effort to not compromise public safety, an emergency purchase was utilized which was signed by both the Police Chief and the Purchasing Director. As required, notice was given by publishing in the newspaper. Expected Implementation Date: June 2025 Contact person: Philip Gore, Interim Director, Purchasing Division

The amendment in question did not constitute a material change in the scope, nature, or intent of the original procurement. The additional funding awarded was consistent with the original services solicited and did not involve new activities or substantially alter the deliverables or performance standards initially procured. As such, the amendment fell within the bounds of the original competitive process and was not required to be procured. The City-Parish procurement policy allows for amendments when they do not exceed the original scope of work or introduce fundamentally different services. The amendment was processed with full documentation of cost reasonableness, continued eligibility under the applicable grant program and internal approval. Therefore, we assert that the contract amendment was executed in accordance with both HUD and local procurement requirements and no formal procurement was necessary. To strengthen internal controls and ensure full alignment with federal procurement requirements, the OCD will document and reinforce internal procedures outlining when procurement is or is not required for amendments within the original scope. Procurement training is ongoing. The OCD staff will conduct refresher training with procurement and program personnel on contract amendment procedures and documentation requirements. Expected Implementation Date: August 2025 Contact person: Kelly LeDuff, Urban Development Director, Office of Community Development

May 27, 2025 U.S. Department of Treasury Tech Goes Home Incorporated respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: AAFCPAs 50 Washington Street Westborough, Massachusetts 01581 Audit period: The finding from the December 31, 2024 schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS - FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY AND MATERIAL INSTANCE OF NONCOMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY Passed through Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation d/b/a Massachusetts Technology Collaboration 2024-001 Procurement Policy and Procedures COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, assistance listing number 21.027. Recommendation: Management should develop and implement a procurement policy that aligns with the requirements set forth in 2 CFR §§ 200.317–200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. Action Taken: Management acknowledges the finding and concurs with the recommendation. TGH is in the process of developing and formalizing a comprehensive procurement policy that complies with the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR §§ 200.317–200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. The policy will address key areas such as allowable procurement methods, competition requirements, contract oversight, and verification against the federal suspension and debarment list. Management anticipates that the procurement policy will be reviewed and approved by the appropriate oversight body by June 30, 2025, and staff will receive training on its implementation shortly thereafter. TGH is committed to strengthening internal controls over procurement to ensure continued compliance with federal requirements. If the U.S. Department of Treasury Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation d/b/a Massachusetts Technology Collaboration has questions regarding this plan, please email Dahlia Bousaid Cox at dahlia@techgoeshome.org. Sincerely yours, Dahlia Bousaid Cox Interim Chief Executive Officer Tech Goes Home Incorporated

Finding 2024-002 Department of the Treasury, Passed Through the State of Michigan Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.029, CPFFN0190, 2024 COVID-19 – Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Finding Summary: During the course of the engagement, it was identified that the Cooperative’s written policy did not address the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Responsible Individuals: Denne’ Smith, Chief Financial Officer Corrective Action Plan: The Cooperative will update its written policy to include the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025

Corrective Action Plan Item 2024-002 Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirement Responsible Parties: Heath McInnis, Assistant Superintendent The Board will provide assurance that proper prevailing wage requirements are added to construction contracts being paid from Federal funds, and that certified payrolls are maintained for each week in which construction work is performed. These changes will be enacted by July 31, 2025

Management’s Response OPSO acknowledges the finding and appreciates the importance of maintaining documented verification of vendor eligibility and ensuring all federally required provisions are present in contracts funded by federal awards. We would like to clarify that the two vendors in question were not suspended or debarred according to SAM.gov records at the time of the audit. However, OPSO did not retain adequate documentation of the verification performed at the time of procurement, nor did we fully integrate all Appendix II provisions in the contract files reviewed. This deficiency did not result from intentional noncompliance but from gaps in procedural oversight and documentation retention stemming from historical procurement practices and limited internal controls over contract file completeness. Corrective Action Plan To address the finding and ensure full future compliance with 2 CFR § 180.300, § 200.326, and related guidance, OPSO has implemented the following corrective actions: 1. Contract File Documentation Protocol Effective July 1, 2025, all procurement files for federal contracts exceeding $25,000 must include: • A printed or digitally archived screenshot of the SAM.gov record showing the vendor’s exclusion status. • A signed vendor eligibility certification form confirming the entity is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. • A signed checklist confirming inclusion of required Appendix II contract All contract files will be centrally stored and monitored by OPSO’s Procurement Division. 2. Updated Procurement Templates OPSO has updated all procurement and contracting templates to: • Include the full list of required provisions from Appendix II to Part 200. • Add a standard Suspension and Debarment certification clause. • Automatically require review of the SAM.gov Exclusions List prior to final contract execution. 3. Staff Training and Compliance Oversight All staff involved in procurement and grant-funded contracting were trained on federal procurement standards and suspension and debarment requirements on December 31, 2025. Refresher trainings will occur semi-annually and be required for new staff during onboarding. A pre-award compliance checklist has been instituted to ensure proper documentation and verification steps are followed and archived. 4. Post-Award Compliance Reviews Beginning Q4 of Fiscal Year 2025, OPSO’s Internal Audit and Compliance Division will conduct quarterly reviews of all federal contract files to ensure: • Proper documentation of vendor eligibility. • Compliance with contract content requirements under 2 CFR Part 200. Findings will be reported directly to the Chief Financial Officer and Sheriff for corrective follow-up if deficiencies are found. Conclusion OPSO remains fully committed to upholding all federal procurement and grant compliance standards. While this finding did not result in questioned costs, we recognize the risk it poses and have taken decisive action to enhance internal controls, training, and documentation standards. We appreciate the audit team’s diligence and remain available to provide any further documentation or clarification needed. provisions.

2024-004 The Akron – Canton Regional Airport Authority request wage reports with all projects. The majority of these reports are submitted with pay applications. The standard practice is that the company overseeing the construction management of the projects submits these reports to the Airport. The Airport had a couple projects without a firm overseeing the construction management. There were a few pay applications associated with these projects that the Airport did not receive wage reports and had to request after the fact. The Airport has since involved more staff members to review pay application for required information. Completed June of 2025 James Krum, VP of Finance and Administration

- We now implemented a best practice to require that a contractor submitting a bid or sub awardees affirms that they are not debarred, suspended or otherwise ineligible for federal funding during contracting with IFPA. We save their email response and include the file in any future audits. - As a best practice, we will make every attempt to avoid sole-sourcing. In cases where solesourcing is unavoidable, we will document and file the sole-source justification of services to be procured from contractors or sub awardees in which it applies in the form of former contacts or otherwise written confirmation - As a result, we will draft and adopt a formal procurement policy.

Person(s) responsible for corrective action: Lucy Yanez, Contract Specialist, Tracy Johnson, Accounts Payable, Tina Hurtado Controller, NWIFC staff and supervisors engaged in procurement and contracting. Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: The NWIFC implemented corrective measures related to procurement in March of 2024. See FY23 Corrective Action Plan. However, the one procurement sample that was cited as not including “documentation of bidding, alternative price quotes or sole source documentation” contained a sole source justification that was developed before implementation of the FY23 Corrective Action Plan. The sole source justification was based on the specialized knowledge and specific expertise. Procurement samples for purchases or contracts after the implementation of the FY23 Corrective Action Plan, show compliance of adequate bidding, price quotes or sole source documentation consistent with 2 CFR 200. The NWIFC will continue to implement the FY23 Corrective Action Plan, by requiring NWIFC managers and their staff to be responsible for soliciting bids or developing sole source justifications for procurements and contracts consistent with 2 CFR 200. The Contract Specialist will ensure that bid solicitations and sole source justifications are properly documented and filed with each contract. Similarly, the audit noted that certain suspension and debarment samples selected, before the FY23 Corrective Action Plan was implemented in March 2024, lacked documentation of a suspension and debarment review prior to doing business with vendors. In response, the FY23 Corrective Action Plan, put into effect in March 2024, included measures to ensure that both new vendor and annual reviews are documented. The Accounts Payable department will continue to conduct suspension and debarment reviews for all new vendors before conducting business and perform annual reviews of all vendors, in line with the FY23 Corrective Action Plan. Anticipated completion date: Completed March 2024.

Policy is being updated. The Maintenance Supervisor will obtain the required 3 bids that include wage rates and review them with the director before final decisions are made. Obtained bids will be kept on file for the period of time required for auditing purposes.

Finding: The Foundation is responsible for implementing policies, including internal controls, that are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of the following objectives: effectiveness and efficiency of operations, reliability of reporting for internal and external use; and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. During the audit, it was identified that the federal procurement and other policies surrounding federal funds, as required under the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200), were not fully implemented until the latter part of the year. Consequently, certain procedures conducted prior to the implementation of the new policies did not incorporate all required federal standards. Corrective Action Taken: Management, under the leadership of the Chief Executive Officer, Josh Goldberg, has developed and fully implemented a comprehensive procurement policy compliant with federal regulations under the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) starting October 2024. This policy ensures adherence to all required federal standards, including competitive bidding, vendor selection, conflict of interest, and documentation requirements. Staff have been thoroughly trained on the new procedures to ensure consistent application across the organization. Internal monitoring controls are in place to ensure ongoing compliance for all federally funded procurements. Management also maintains active communication with awarding agencies to ensure a clear understanding and proper implementation of all compliance requirements related to federal funds. Completion Date: January 1, 2025

U.S. Department of the Treasury AUDIT FINDINGS: Finding Reference Number: 2024-001 Description of Finding: Family Centered Services of CT, Inc. had not updated its procurement policy to conform to requirements in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. The policy in effect during fiscal 2024 did not specify a micro-purchase or small purchase threshold above which written quotes would be required. Additionally, a written policy for ensuring vendors are not suspended or debarred was not included in the existing policy and therefore this process was not being executed in a consistent manner. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: Family Centered Services of CT, Inc. concurs with this audit finding. Corrective Action: A new Uniform Guidance-compliant procurement policy, including a process to ensure vendors are not debarred, was prepared and implemented in January 2025. Relevant staff have been and continue to be trained appropriately regarding execution of related procedures to ensure all aspects are being properly performed, Name of Contact Person: Jacquelyn Farrell, LCSW Executive Director 203-624-2600x204 jfarrell@familyct.org Projected Completion Date: Immediately

Finding 2024-004 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Description of Finding The Town of Lincoln’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.303, and 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence Management concurs with the finding. Corrective Action Management is working with our current auditors to update the Town’s procurement policies to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Name of Contact Person John Cimino, Finance Director Projected Completion Date 6/30/2026

The American Immunization Registry Association (AIRA) respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ending September 30, 2024. Independent public accounting firm: HAN GROUP, LLC, Washington, DC Audit period: Year ending September 30, 2024 The finding from the year ending September 30, 2024, Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. 2024-001 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. Audit Recommendation – Strengthen internal controls over procurement documentation by: 1. Implementing a standardized procurement checklist to ensure all required documentation is maintained. 2. Establishing a formal review process to verify and document vendor eligibility through SAM.gov before awarding federally funded contracts. 3. Conducting regular training for staff involved in procurement to reinforce federal compliance requirements. Management Response – AIRA acknowledges the finding and will implement the following: 1. Procurement Checklist: A standardized procurement checklist will be developed and required for all federally funded procurements. This checklist will help ensure consistent documentation practices and that all necessary procurement steps and compliance elements are completed and retained. Documentation of the completed checklist will be retained in the procurement file. 2. Vendor Eligibility Verification: A formal review process will be established to verify and document vendor eligibility through SAM.gov before awarding any contracts funded with federal funds. Documentation of the eligibility check will be retained in the procurement file. 3. Staff Training: Targeted training sessions will be conducted on a recurring basis for all staff involved in the procurement process. These trainings will reinforce federal compliance requirements, including proper documentation practices and suspension/debarment verification. Training completion will be tracked and documented. Implementation Timeline – As of March 18, 2025, AIRA has implemented a verification of vendor eligibility process using SAM.gov. The procurement checklist will be developed and implemented by April 30, 2025, and regular trainings will commence by May 31, 2025. We are committed to ensuring full compliance with federal procurement requirements. Please contact the Business and Operations Director at 202-552-0208 with any questions.

Description of Finding The Town’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Although the Town did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the Town did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Town's major programs. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence Management agrees with the finding. Corrective Action The Town will develop a conforming procurement policy including all essential elements. Name of Contact Person Richard Monico, Director of Administration/Procurement Projected Completion Date June 30, 2025

Finding Summary: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids were not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Responsible Individuals: Andre Stringfellow, Chief Financial Officer Corrective Action Plan: Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation. Anticipated Completion Date: August 2025

Audit period: The findings from the June 30, 2024 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the number assigned in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Finding 2024-001 – COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund - AL No. 21.027 U.S. Department of Treasury Other Matters Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Program Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition and Context: During our testing as it related to compliance with procurement we noted that an expense for engineering services for the Waste Water Treatment Assessment services charged to the major program would have required a formal bidding process as the project exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The Town had selected the engineering company for “On Call” engineering services as it related to the DPW through a request for qualifications process. The contract does include as part of the services to be provided Waste Water Treatment Assessment services. However, the contract is not specific to federally funded projects. The Town of Medfield had submitted the request for qualifications documentation as well as the executed contracted for “On Call” services to both the Town’s consulting service and the pass through entity for approval of the Waste Water Treatment Assessment. The pass through entity and the pass through entities Auditors did not have any concerns with the request for qualifications as it relates to the Waste Water Treatment Assessment project. Questioned Costs: $40,500 Cause: Based on the judgement of the pass through entity (Norfolk County) and their auditors, the Town was approved to procure engineering services for the Waste Water Treatment Assessment as part of a larger “On Call” services contract. The Town did select the contractor through a competitive request for qualifications process, but did not initiate a separate procurement for the sub-project. Effect or Potential Effect: There is risk that amounts charged to the federal awards major program may not be in accordance with procurement, suspension, and debarment principles. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: Going forward, the Town of Medfield should consider a separate bidding process for expenses related to federal grant funds. Responsible for Corrective Plan: Contact Person: Kristine Trierweiler, Town Administrator Estimated Completion Date: April 30th, 2025 Action Taken: On an ongoing basis, the Town will initiate separate procurements for projects covered under federal grants.

Finding 2024-003 - Wage Rate Compliance: The District has consulted legal counsel and secured a standardized contract template to be used for construction projects financed with Federal funds. This contract will be implemented consistently moving forward to ensure compliance with applicable wage rate regulations.