Corrective Action Plans

Procurement procedures have been reiterated with staff members and enhanced to include quotes and bids as necessary. Responsible Official: Director of Finance Expected Completion Date: Completed.

Crime Victim Assistance – Assistance Listing No. 16.575 Recommendation: The Organization should continue to apply its current procurement policy to new and existing vendors to ensure proper documentation is retained in accordance with said procurement policy and SA UG. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization will apply its current procurement policy to new and existing vendors in order to comply with applicable procurement requirements. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Tracy Johnson, Director of Finance Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025

Finding 2023-005 ● Condition: There are no written policies and procedures for allowable costs/cost principles, cash management, procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. ● Cause: The Organization does not have a process for reviewing their accounting policies and procedures manual on a regular basis to ensure written procedures conform to Uniform Guidance requirements. ● Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding and they will evaluate our findings to determine an appropriate corrective action. Financial policies and procedures will be created and implemented. Annual schedule of expenditures will be created by Executive Director or Bookkeeper and reviewed by Board of Directors. Contact Person: Kirsten Jurcek Anticipated Date of Completion: September 1, 2026

IC 2024-005 Wage Rate Requirements -Review of Certified Payroll Reports For each week in which work was performed under the contract or subcontract, the required certified payroll reports were not fo1mally reviewed. a) We concur with IC 2024-005 that for each week in which work was perfo1med, the required certified payroll reports were not formally reviewed by the County. b) Management concurs with this finding. We will work to develop policies and procedures for ensuring that an appropriate level of senior staff or management review certified payroll reports independently of any reviews performed by contracted engineering firms. James Shubert, County Manager and Beverly York, Senior Accounting Supervisor, are responsible for the corrective action process and anticipate resolution by June 30, 2025.

IC 2024-004 Wage Rate Requirements - Contract Language Required prevailing wage rate clauses were not included in the contract or subcontract. a) We concur with IC 2024-004 that the required language was not included in the contract or subcontract. b) Management concurs with this finding. We will work to develop policies and procedures for ensuring that contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements include in the contract language the required prevailing wage rate clauses in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. James Shubert, County Manager and Beverly York, Senior Accounting Supervisor, are responsible for the corrective action process and anticipate resolution by June 30, 2025 .

The City will develop written policies and procedures for procurement, including the relevant provisions required by 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.326 Contract provisions.

The City will develop written policies and procedures which include the relevant provisions required by 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.327 Contract provisions.

Finding 2024-016 Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Condition: The DPS Grant Administration did not adhere to the Danbury Public Schools “Bids and Purchases Competitive” procurement policies, that were compliant with Federal Part 3 compliance guidelines. DPS had a procurement policy in place that was consistent with the standards of the aforementioned compliance sections; however, DPS did not follow their own procurement policy in certain instances which consists of obtaining three quotes for a small purchase procurements and advertising for bids publicly for large >$5,000 purchase procurements. They only obtained one quote for small purchases, and they did not use a public bid process for expenditures over $5,000. Additionally, DPS did not have internal controls in place to ensure vendor eligibility was verified prior to entering into a covered transaction with them. Contact Person: Michael Weaver, CFO, Danbury Public Schools Corrective Actions Planned: We agree with the finding. The policy was revised at the end of the 2025 Fiscal Year. Additionally, a new and additional review process was put into place prior toentering a requisition for approval. This process requires all necessary documentation be furnished to the finance office prior to the requisition being approved. Completion Date: 7/16/2025

2024-003 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters – Special Tests and Provisions Name of Contact Person: Mariya Lovishchuk, Development Director Corrective Action: This was a clerical error issue. Davis Bacon Wages were paid throughout the entire project and certified payroll was provided. However, the original construction contract did not include the correct prevailing wage language. Prevailing wages requirement was discussed and agreed upon prior to issuance of contract, but wrong language was inserted by mistake. Upon discovery of the wrong language, contract amendment was immediately issued to rectify. Proposed Completion Date: Already complete

The Organization will develop and implement written procurement policies and procedures that comply with Uniform Guidance and ensure consistent application across all procurement activities.

Corrective Action Plan Finding 2024-002 Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients “must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price” 2 CFR section 200.318(i). Auditor Recommendation: We recommend the Academy ensure it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Auditee Response/ Corrective Action Plan: The Academy will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified. Person Responsible: Tim Stay, CEO Timeline: All future contract solicitations will follow the required procurement standards.

The Town Supervisor will provide an updated policy to be approved by the Town Board in 2025.

Department of the Treasury Federal Financial Assistance Listing/ALN 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Finding Summary: The Organization does not have a procurement policy that conforms to applicable standards under Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth in the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement policies required. Responsible Individuals: Steve Kuehneman, Executive Director, Bob Pawlikowski, Director of Finance and the Board of Directors of CARE Communities. Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Management and the Board of Directors have reviewed Eide Bailly’s procurement recommendations and will adopt a Board-approved Procurement Policy that complies with Uniform Guidance. The Organization will apply these procurement requirements to all applicable contracts and will review contracts to ensure inclusion of all provisions required under Uniform Guidance. Anticipated Completion Date: 2026

SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER – PROCUREMENT U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 & 84.173 Passed Through Minnesota Department of Education Pass Through Number: H027A220087 Award Period: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Recommendation: We recommend that the district ensure quotes are obtained for all procurements that are above the micro-purchase threshold, and that this process is documented along with their assessments of cost analysis performed. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: The District will work on educating all of the personnel involved in the procurement processes to ensure the compliance requirements are fully understood and a proper review of all procurements and procurement methods will be performed. This will be implemented by December 31, 2025 and the School Board will be responsible for monitoring the status. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Tom Sager, Executive Chief of Financial Services Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2025

CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER – PROCUREMENT U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 and 93.558 Passed Through Minnesota Department of Education Pass Through Number: 10.CNC Award Period: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Recommendation: We recommend that the district ensure quotes are obtained for all procurements that are above the micro-purchase threshold, and that this process is documented along with their assessments of cost analysis performed. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: The District will work on educating all the personnel involved in the procurement processes to ensure the compliance requirements are fully understood and a proper review of all procurements and procurement methods will be performed. This will be implemented by December 31, 2025, and the School Board will be responsible for monitoring the status. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Tom Sager, Executive Chief of Financial Services Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2025

Response/Corrective Action Plan: We concur with the finding and will revise the procurement policy as well as the internal control policies and procedures specific to the County to be in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Upon completion, the new policy will be provided to all department heads to ensure proper compliance in the utilization and disbursement of federal funds.

Finding: Material weakness in internal control over procurement policies Questioned costs: ALN 81:113 ($31,120) ALN 19.901 ($15,000) Corrective action: While PFI accepts the finding and the rationale for identifying questioned costs based on Uniformed Guidance (UG) requirements for documentation regarding competitive bidding and contract types, it believes there is adequate documentation to justify incurred costs. PFI will update its procurement policy guidelines to reflect current UG requirements to include acquisition thresholds and competitive bidding procedures. Completion Date: February 1, 2026 Responsible Individual: Executive Director

Contact Person(s): Sarat Puthenpura Corrective action planned: ONF is in the process of upgrading its current written procurement policy to better comply with Federal audit requirements. The policy will be updated to include: • Inclusion of services under coverage of the policy • Micro purchase threshold explicitly defined. • Clear provisions for maintaining detailed procurement records including a requirement that such records should include the rationale for the procurement method, the selection of contract type, the contractor selection or rejection process, and the basis for the contract price. • The simplified acquisition threshold explicitly defined and incorporates all relevant elements including sealed bids method. Anticipated completion date: 11/30/25

Formula Grants for Rural Area and Tribal Transit Program Federal Assistance Listing #20.509 Recommendation: The Organization should review 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and state requirements for procurement. The Organization should ensure documents are retained to support whether procurement policies were followed for vendors procured in years past. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization will review the procurement standards as well as ensure documents are retained to support whether procurement policies were followed. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Carrie Beithon, Director of Financial Services Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 12/31/2026

Finding 2024-011 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment (Material Weakness) Finding: The Organization did not have sufficient controls to ensure that the procurement requirement was met due to staff turnover. Management Response: Management agrees. Corrective action plan: •All procurements now require documentation of vendor eligibility verification (SAM.gov) and compliance with competitive bidding rules. Responsible Party: CFO Completion Date/Status: Expected to be Implemented by end of 2025; ongoing review.

Financial leadership of Child Saving Institute Inc. is in the process of developing a new procurement plan that will put the agency in compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326

COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: CLA recommends the County follow their internal procurement policy procedures and keep documentation of such procedures to ensure compliance with the federal procurement requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The County will implement policies and procedures to ensure that future awards or contracts with expenditures of American Rescue Plan (APRA) funds will follow the procurement guidelines outlined in the US Treasury rules and regulations as well as County procurement policies. Most of the 2024 expenditures were part of contracts that were already in place when the original findings came out in September 2023 so this could not be corrected. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Craig McBrain, Deputy Director of Budget and Finance Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2025

We will incorporate oversight of procurement for the agency to our Accounts Payagble Manager’s job duties and in addition revise our protocols and procedures to adhere to procurement standards found in 2 CFR 200.317-200.326 of the Uniform Guidance. The protocols and procedures will include the following methods of procurement: o Micro-purchases (≤ $10,000): Award without competitive quotations if the price is reasonable; distribute purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. o Small purchases ($10,000–$250,000): Obtain price or rate quotations from at least two qualified sources; document quotes and selection rationale. o Sealed bids (≥ $250,000): Publicly solicit bids; award to the lowest responsible bidder. o Competitive proposals (≥ $250,000): Use when sealed bids are not appropriate; publicize RFPs and evaluate proposals based on predetermined factors o Non-competitive proposals (sole source): Use only when justified (e.g., single source, emergency, federal authorization, inadequate competition). o Maintain Oversight of Contractors to ensure contractors perform according to contract terms. o Record Keeping including: Rationale for method used, selection of contract, selection and rejection of contractor o Training - Provide training to all staff responsible for procurement on the updated policy and procedures.

The District is in the process of reviewing its procurement practices and intends to implement a formal policy in alignment with state and federal requirements. Coordination with Burleigh County will continue to ensure compliance and proper documentation of procurement activities.

The District is in the process of reviewing its procurement practices and intends to implement a formal policy in alignment with state and federal requirements. Coordination with Burleigh County will continue to ensure compliance and proper documentation of procurement activities.