Corrective Action Plans

Management will continue strengthen its processes and internal control to ensure that report of expenditures is reviewed by Finance prior to submission and only includes expenditures incurred in the period. Purchase orders will no longer be included in any submissions. Management will amend its procurement policy to ensure the policy includes the required regulations as outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations in relation to Federal Awards and that all relevant documentation will be retained.

Finding 2024-002 – COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund - AL No. 21.027 U.S. Department of Treasury Noncompliance and Material Weakness Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Program Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. As governmental subrecipients of states they are also required to use the same state procurement policies and procedures for federal funds as for non‐federal funds, the Town is required to follow Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter (MGL) 30(b). MGL 30(b) requires the solicitation of three written or oral quotes for procurements of supplies between $10,000 and $49,999 and sealed bids or proposals for procurements of supplies $50,000 and over. Management of the Town is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with federal requirements that have a direct and material effect on a federal program. However, a deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. Condition and Context: During fiscal year 2024, the Town did not comply with the required procurement policies and procedures in place as it related to expenses charged to the major program requiring procurement procedures. One of the expense tested was for engineering services that would have been exempt under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter (MGL) 30(b) (State Procurement Requirement), under federal statutes and procurement requirements for engineering services identified in 2 CFR Part 200, the Town would have been required to go out to bid for the services. Questioned Costs: $413,477.78 Cause: The noncompliance occurred because the organization mistakenly relied on Massachusetts Chapter 30B exemptions, which govern state and local procurements, and did not recognize the need to comply with the more stringent federal procurement requirements for federal fund usage. Staff members were not sufficiently aware of the specific requirements under 2 CFR Part 200 and the precedence of federal procurement regulations over state law in this context. Effect or Potential Effect: There is risk that the amounts charged to the federal awards major program may not be in accordance with procurement, suspension, and debarment principles. Identification as a Repeat Finding: 2023-003 Recommendation: The Town of Bellingham should address the nocompliance and material weakness in internal controls noted above in order to ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with federal and state requirements. Responsible for Corrective Plan: CFO Estimated Completion Date: January 2025 Action Taken: We acknowledge the audit finding regarding our reliance on Massachusetts Chapter 30B exemptions for procurement involving federal funds. We understand that federal procurement regulations under 2 CFR Part 200 take precedence over state law and that we failed fully to comply with federal requirements for competitive bidding, sole-source justification, and documentation. We are committed to addressing this issue by reviewing our procurement policies to clearly differentiate between state and federal requirements, ensuring that federal standards govern all procurement involving federal funds. We will provide additional training to staff, implement stronger documentation procedures, and review past procurement to ensure full compliance moving forward.

IBBG will develop and adopt a written procurement policy that is consistent with the Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR §§200.318–200.326, and applicable state and local laws. The policy will outline procurement methods, competitive bidding requirements, conflicts of interest, and documentation standards. In addition: • A draft policy will be prepared by the I Be Black Girl leadership, the finance committee, and D&K Financial LLC. • The Board of Directors will adopt the final policy. • Training will be provided to staff involved in procurement to ensure consistent implementation of the procurement process.

Management Response: The Organization will establish a procurement policy in 2025. Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2025 Responsible Party: Board of Directors

United States Department of Agriculture Federal Assistance Listing #10.855 Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grants United Stated Department of Treasury Federal Assistance Listing #21.029 COVID-19 Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Finding Summary: During the course of the engagement, it was identified that the Cooperative does not have a written policy that addresses the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Responsible Individuals: Mark Vosacek Finance Manager Corrective Action Plan: The Cooperative will modify its written procurement policy 322 to include the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025

Professional and Cultural Exchange Programs - Citizen Exchanges - Assistance Listing No. 19.415 Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation review its procurement and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: American Institute For Foreign Study Foundation, Inc. does not agree with the finding. During a visit by representatives of BEGA the existing procurement policy was shared with those representatives. They approved of it and did not recommend any changes. However, a compliant policy that complies with CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 will be developed. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: James Mahoney, CFO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: August 31, 2025

2024-005 Conservation Research and Development Program – Assistance Listing #81.086 Recommendation: The Organization should follow established written policies and procedures regarding procurement and properly document the process for each procurement made. Explanation of disagreement with audit findings: There is no disagreement with the audit findings. Action Plan: We agree with the auditor’s comments and have taken steps to strengthen compliance with procurement policies. We have established additional documentation requirements for all procurements, ensuring that each transaction clearly reflects adherence to policy, including vendor selection rationale and approval workflows. Procurement policies are being updated to incorporate explicit internal controls and approval processes. Staff involved in procurement will receive guidance on these updated requirements. Name(s) of the contact people responsible for correction action: Gina Avalos-Limardo, Director of Finance & Operations and Cho Heide, Contracts & Compliance Manager Plan completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2025

Contact Person – Pattie Solberg, City Auditor Corrective Action Plan – The City will implement a written procurement policy that follows Uniform Guidance and will review vendors for suspension and debarment before entering into covered transactions. Completion Date – December 1, 2025

Management’s Response: The Association will update its purchasing policy to ensure the procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.317 – 200.326 are incorporated.

Department of the Treasury, Passed Through the State of Michigan Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.029, CV0019120, 2024 COVID-19 - Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material NoncomplianceFinding Summary: During the course of the engagement, it was identified that the Cooperative's written policy did not address the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. In addition, the Cooperative did not follow procurement, suspension, and debarment procedures required under the Uniform Guidance prior to entering into contracts with vendors. Responsible Individuals: Director of Administration Services, General Manager Corrective Action Plan: The Cooperative will update its Board Policy No. 205 to include the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. In addition, the Cooperative will maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement, suspension, and debarment procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025

2024-002: Procurement Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Condition: The School did not always follow procurement standards as put forth in 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.326. Context: For two of 25 vendors within the Simplified Acquisition Threshold tested, the School did not maintain documentation that appropriate procurement procedures were performed or provide documentation to support the School's reasoning for a noncompetitive procurement. Repeat Finding: Similar to prior year finding 2023-003. Action planned in response to finding: Management will implement procedures to ensure that competitive purchasing procedures are performed for all transactions above the micro purchase threshold and documentation is maintained to support the procurement procedures performed. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025 Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Dolores Silva, Chief Financial Officer

Finding 2024-002 Corrective Action: We will update our procurement policies and procedures to align with the latest Uniform Guidance requirements, including the 2024 updates that mandate documentation of price reasonableness for all micro-purchases. We plan to adopt a standardized coding submission that clearly articulates the various types of purchases and the appropriate documentatoin for each type of purchase. We will adopt regular training sessions for procurement and grant management staff to reinforce comnpliance requirements and proper documentation practices. Person Responsible: Interim CFO - Bruce Tyler and Finance Director - Jason Phillips Timing for Implementation: October 31, 2025

Person responsible for this corrective action plan: Jana Kent, Executive Director Corrective Action Plan: YNHA is developing a suspension and debarment training for all staff and program managers to ensure that suspension and debarment requirements are adhered to and include a search on Sam.gov, as required. Estimated Completion Date: October 31, 2025

Contact Person (s): Jim McCarthy - jim@waterwatch.org ; Neil Brandt – neil@waterwatch.org Corrective actions planned: The following corrective actions are being immediately implemented for contracts in WaterWatch’s restoration program in order to achieve compliance: 1. Language requiring all contractors to comply with the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act is added to all new WaterWatch contracts and all current contracts via amendment. 2. Language requiring all contractors to comply with federal suspension and debarment contracting standards is added to all new WaterWatch contracts and all current contracts via amendment. 3. WaterWatch will keep formal documentation of debarment searches for all contractors. 4. WaterWatch will keep formal documentation of contractor procurement process in both Southern Oregon and Portland offices. Anticipated completion date: September 1, 2025

Material weakness in internal control over compliance with procurement procedures meeting the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Management Response: We acknowledge the finding and provide the following corrective action plan. Corrective Action Plan: PDA adopted a new, updated procurement policy in October 2024. PDA worked with Clark Nuber to develop this policy. Anticipated Completion Date: October of 2024 Name(s) of the Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: Barbara Donohue, Director of Finance Lisa Daugaard, Tara Moss, and Fe LopezGaetke Co-Executive Directors

Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Immaterial Instance of Noncompliance Finding Summary: The City does not have a written policy on procurement that satisfied the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Responsible Individuals: Finance Officer Corrective Action Plan: The City will establish controls to follow all applicable procurement requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025

The Organization is in the process of revising its procurement and conflict of interest policies to ensure alignment with the requirements of 2 CFR §§ 200.318 through 200.326. During fiscal year 2026, the Organization will adopt updated written procedures and implement a formal internal control checklist to verify compliance with federal procurement standards across all grant-funded purchases. Staff responsible for procurement will receive training on the revised policies to ensure consistent application moving forward.

Corrective Action Plan: During Q4 2025, Shiloh’s general purchasing policy will be updated to consider the requirements included in 2 CFR 200.328 through 200.326. (Note: This update was originally to be implemented in Q4 2024 but was delayed due to unexpected turnover in the Business Department.)

Program: Summer Food Service Program CFDA: 10.559 Finding Type: Noncompliance / Significant Deficiency Issue: Purchases from two food vendors exceeded the micro-purchase threshold without documented price comparisons or quotations. Management's Response: Response: Management acknowledges the importance of adhering to federal procurement standards, including the requirement for competitive pricing and documentation for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Corrective Action Taken: Staff involved in procurement have been trained on 2 CFR 200.318-200.326 to ensure understanding of federal procurement requirements. A procurement forecast is now developed at the beginning of each grant cycle to identify vendors likely to exceed the micro-purchase threshold. . For all vendors expected to exceed $10,000 in purchases, the YMCA will obtain and retain at least three price comparisons or quotations. A procurement checklist and documentation log have been implemented to ensure compliance and audit readiness. Responsible Individuals: Karrie Stanford and Gina Franklin Completion Date: Plan has been implemented as of the date of audit submission.

District has been in discussion with our attorney and have already got a new ordinance written and put into effect as of June 1, 2025. CVDWSD currently has a procurement policy as a ordinance.

2024 – 009 Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Federal Agency: Department of Interior Federal Program Title: Outdoor Recreation Acquisition, Development and Planning ALN: 15.916 Pass-Through Agency: Arizona State Park Trails Pass-Through Number(s): 04-007-652304 Award Number and Period: 04/18/2022-12/31/24 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Condition/Context: There was no support provided for the three out of three contractor vendors with construction work noted on their purchase orders to support compliance with Davis Bacon. Corrective Action Plan: Regarding the wage tests for the Park’s grant, no information was provided to the City from the contractor of employee wages paid by the contractor. An email request and answer from the contractor was forwarded to the auditors, that the contractor was not responsible to report the wages. This in the future will be part of the Grants Coordinator position for Internal Control purposes, to ensure that any future construction contracts include the wage reporting requirements. Anticipated completion date: December 2025 Contact Person: Mr. Joel Kramer, City Manager

Finding Number: 2024-001 Recommendation: Create a procurement policy that meets the requirements detailed in 2 CFR 200.318– 200.327 Action Taken: AANA will implement a new Procurement Policy as it relates to purchases and grants supported by the MAST program. See document “MAST Procurement Policy” Responsible Contact Person for Planned Corrective Action: Dennis Siena Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2025

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and will adopt a formal Federal procurement policy which includes all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626.

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding and will adopt a formal Federal procurement policy which includes all elements identified in 2CFR Sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.626.

Finding 2024-003 – Material Weakness Award No.: AL No. 15.555 and AL No. 15.074 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. AL No. 15.074 Passed-through the Del Puerto Water District. Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. Condition: The following conditions were noted during the single audit: • The District was not able to provide evidence that procurements for the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project and Poso Canal Bridge Replacement Project design contractors under AL 15.555 met the requirements for adequate price competition and was unable to provide documentation confirming the sole-source solicitations met the requirements of Uniform Guidance. Specifically the District was unable to provide evidence it received enough statements of qualification to have adequate price competition or complied with one or more provisions of Section 200.210(c) that allows a sole source agreement to occur. It would appear the District would need evidence that the grantor approved the sole source procurement, but was not able to provide documentation of approvals of sole source procurements by the grantors. The District also was unable to provide documentation of the advertisement of the solicitation of requests for qualifications for the Fish Screen and Control Structure Project. • The District was not able to provide adequate documentation that the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project contract under AL 15.555 and Orestimba Creek Recharge and Recovery Expansion Project contract under AL 15.074 complied with Section 200.327 and appendix II to this part requiring federal contract provisions to be included in the approved contract. This resulted in the District not having evidence that the contractor certified it was in compliance with all required federal provisions. Criteria: Uniform Guidance states the following: • Section 200.318(i) states that “The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractors selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” • Section 300.320(c) states “There are specific circumstances in which the recipient or subrecipient may use a noncompetitive procurement method. The noncompetitive procurement method may only be used if one of the following circumstances applies: (1) The aggregate amount of the procurement transaction does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The procurement transaction can only be fulfilled by a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from providing public notice of a competitive solicitation; (4) The recipient or subrecipient requests in writing to use a noncompetitive procurement method, and the Federal agency or pass-through entity provides written approval; or (5) After soliciting several sources, competition is determined inadequate. • The provisions of the Brooks Act (49 United State Code, Section 1104) require local agencies to award federally funded engineering and design related contracts, otherwise know as A&E contracts, on the basis of fair and open competitive negotiations, demonstrated competence, and professional qualifications (23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 172) at a fair and reasonable price (48 CFR 31.201-3). Both federal regulation and California state law (Government Code 4525-4529 et a) require selection of A&E consultant services on the basis of demonstrated competence and professional qualifications. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be used only when the award of a contract is infeasible under small purchase procedures, sealed bids or competitive proposals, as cited above. • Section 200.327 states “The non-federal entity’s contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in appendix II to this part.” Appendix II contains requirements to include in federally funded contracts termination for cause and convenience provisions, Equal Employment Opportunity provisions, Davis-Bacon Act provisions, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act provisions, Clean Air Act provisions, debarment and suspension provisions, Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment provisions, and other provisions, as applicable. Cause: The current staff was not able to find procurement documentation prepared before they were hired. Effect: The District was unable to provide evidence that it was in compliance with the requirement to maintain documentation indicating the procurement was in compliance with Uniform Guidance Sections 200.318 to 200.327 and appendix II to this part. Context: The original procurement for the consulting firm for the Mendota Pool Fish Screens and Control Structure project was performed in September 2018 and awarded in late October 2018. This procurement precedes the current staff. Staff indicated the grantor approved the Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure Project sole source procurement and the Board Resolution approving the agreement indicated the grantor approved the sole source procurement, but staff was not able to provide proof of written approval by the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend management implement additional controls over the procurement process that ensures each procurement complies with Uniform Guidance Section 200.318 to 200.326, including training of staff working on procurements of the documentation retention and other requirements under the Uniform Guidance. We further recommend the District establish a procurement folder on its server with subfolder for each individual procurement where documentation of each procurement is maintained, including advertising of the procurement, requests for proposals/qualifications with language that satisfies Uniform Guidance requirements, proposals received, executed contracts, certifications of compliance with federal contracting provisions by the contractor if not part of the proposal or executed contracts, documented quantitative and qualitative analysis indicating why the recommended bid was selected for approval, management report to board recommending which bid should be approved, board resolution approving the winning bid and for contracts under $250,000 a memo or form documenting bids received and reason for selecting the bid, including reasons for not selecting the lowest bid if applicable. If a sole source procurement method is used, documentation showing the sole source procurement is allowable under criteria listed in Section 300.320(c) should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will keep procurement folders on each procurement in the future that includes the confirmation in the recommendation and will consult with Reclamation on whether a contract amendment is necessary to document the federal contract. Estimated Completion Date of Corrective Action: Future procurement projects