Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,436
In database
Filtered Results
674
Matching current filters
Showing Page
6 of 27
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: § 200.305
Corrective Action: The organization has enhanced its payment workflow to guarantee prompt disbursement of funds to providers. Improvements include automated alerts and internal checkpoints designed to prioritize payments immediately after grant funds are received. Anticipated Completion Date: Correc...
Corrective Action: The organization has enhanced its payment workflow to guarantee prompt disbursement of funds to providers. Improvements include automated alerts and internal checkpoints designed to prioritize payments immediately after grant funds are received. Anticipated Completion Date: Corrected.
Corrective Action: The Finance Director will establish clear timelines for submitting and processing payment requests to prevent any discrepancies in cash requests or disbursements. Well-defined internal procedures, including submission deadlines and approval workflows, will ensure that funds are re...
Corrective Action: The Finance Director will establish clear timelines for submitting and processing payment requests to prevent any discrepancies in cash requests or disbursements. Well-defined internal procedures, including submission deadlines and approval workflows, will ensure that funds are requested, approved, and drawn down efficiently. Ongoing monitoring of pending requests, coupled with proactive communication among team members, will further support timely financial management and minimize any risks. Responsible Person: Director of Finance
College officials acknowledge the error and attribute it to the misclassification of the grant under an incorrect organization code. They note that the funds were ultimately expended for allowable project costs within the same fiscal year. The College agrees to enhance training and implement additio...
College officials acknowledge the error and attribute it to the misclassification of the grant under an incorrect organization code. They note that the funds were ultimately expended for allowable project costs within the same fiscal year. The College agrees to enhance training and implement additional review procedures to ensure compliance with cash management requirements going forward.
In Finding 2025-002, the Organization made several draws of federal funds for which expenditures had not been incurred at the time of the draw. The Organization is required to minimize the time between draws and expenditures. Management recognizes the importance of the requirements to disburse feder...
In Finding 2025-002, the Organization made several draws of federal funds for which expenditures had not been incurred at the time of the draw. The Organization is required to minimize the time between draws and expenditures. Management recognizes the importance of the requirements to disburse federal funds in a timely manner. In response to Finding 2025-002, procedures. will be established to document these expenditures prior to transferring the from the U.S. Treasury to ensure that advance draws of federal funds do not occur.
In Finding 2025-002, it was reported that the Organization’s did not reconcile federal grant expenditures in a timely manner, resulting in a lack of draws of federal funds for which qualifying expenditures had been made prior to the end of the Organization’s financial statement year end. Management ...
In Finding 2025-002, it was reported that the Organization’s did not reconcile federal grant expenditures in a timely manner, resulting in a lack of draws of federal funds for which qualifying expenditures had been made prior to the end of the Organization’s financial statement year end. Management recognizes the importance of complying with federal grant guidelines. In response to Finding 2025-002, the Organization understands the importance of timely reconciliations of federal grant expenditures and timely draws of federal grant funds. The Organization will review its processes and procedures to ensure that federal grants are reconciled in a timely manner.
Condition: While testing of internal controls over cash management it was noted that the Center did not follow procedures in place for the draw down of federal funds. Action Taken: Update grant intake process to identify draw down procedures outlined in grant agreement or agency terms and conditions...
Condition: While testing of internal controls over cash management it was noted that the Center did not follow procedures in place for the draw down of federal funds. Action Taken: Update grant intake process to identify draw down procedures outlined in grant agreement or agency terms and conditions. Document and follow identified procedures for all grant draw downs.
2025-004 Cash Management (repeat of finding 2024-008) Corrective action planned: Beginning April 1, 2025, when the organization was made aware of this finding in last year’s audit, OMC took immediate corrective action. The CFO/Designee monitors expenses and prepares a detailed report of expenditures...
2025-004 Cash Management (repeat of finding 2024-008) Corrective action planned: Beginning April 1, 2025, when the organization was made aware of this finding in last year’s audit, OMC took immediate corrective action. The CFO/Designee monitors expenses and prepares a detailed report of expenditures claimed for reimbursement and retains this documentation along with supporting invoices. A qualified, knowledgeable CFO will continue to ensure compliance with these requirements. Anticipated completion date: Corrective Action taken on April 1, 2025. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Allen Boyd, Director of Fiscal Operations
Condition 1. On July 31, the newly developed pre-award risk assessment tool was rolled out to all subrecipients and ministries with oversight, effective FY2027. Conditions 2-3: On July 29, July 31 and August 5, 2026, training was conducted on Majuro and Ebeye to introduce new and enhanced tools to s...
Condition 1. On July 31, the newly developed pre-award risk assessment tool was rolled out to all subrecipients and ministries with oversight, effective FY2027. Conditions 2-3: On July 29, July 31 and August 5, 2026, training was conducted on Majuro and Ebeye to introduce new and enhanced tools to strengthen subrecipient monitoring. It covered the following topics: 1. Audit findings related to subrecipient arrangements. 2. Grants Management Manual with emphasis on its scope and the Management Decision Letter (MDL). 3. Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), which is mandatory. 4. Memorandum of Agreement and the significance of each section. 5. MOA circulation process. 6. Procurement Code 2023 7. Reporting and Required Supporting Documents: - Pre-award Risk Assessment - Site Visit Checklist - Enhanced SubGrant Forms and Review Checklist (SG1/Subgrant Objectives and Budget Proposal and SG2/Performance and Financial Evaluation) - SG Forms supporting documentation (salaries & wages, fuel purchase, food purchase, vehicle rental, housing allowance, travel, etc.) 8. Conflict of Interest In September 2026, officers from the Compliance and SOE Monitoring Unit will start going out to conduct the pre-award risk assessment. Results of the assessment will determine whether the entity can sign an MOA with the MOF or not as well as the entity's risk rating, which will determine the frequency of site visits to be conducted by Compliance beginning FY2027. Condition 4 Effective 3rd quarter of FY2025, all transactions charged to the Enewetak grant go through the national procurement and payment process.
Effective FY2025, the Accounting Division is now required to prepare drawdown request forms using the detailed expenditure report (journal listing). Each request is submitted to the Finance Secretary only after approval by Accounting Management.
Effective FY2025, the Accounting Division is now required to prepare drawdown request forms using the detailed expenditure report (journal listing). Each request is submitted to the Finance Secretary only after approval by Accounting Management.
See 2024-006. This issue has been eliminated as we will have none going forward.
See 2024-006. This issue has been eliminated as we will have none going forward.
This problem only applied to the HHS program that was eliminated in December 2023. All other programs that we contract with are paid in arrears and there are no advances. We have proposed a settlement agreement with HHS to eliminate the overpayment and interest. Benjie Read will be responsible for t...
This problem only applied to the HHS program that was eliminated in December 2023. All other programs that we contract with are paid in arrears and there are no advances. We have proposed a settlement agreement with HHS to eliminate the overpayment and interest. Benjie Read will be responsible for the settlement agreement, by October 31, 2026.
2024-011 Timely Grant Draws Material Weakness Recommendation: The Housing Authority should adopt written grant draw policies into its financial policies and procedures manual. Financials should be reviewed monthly, and drawdowns made as needed. Action Taken: The Housing Authority agrees with this fi...
2024-011 Timely Grant Draws Material Weakness Recommendation: The Housing Authority should adopt written grant draw policies into its financial policies and procedures manual. Financials should be reviewed monthly, and drawdowns made as needed. Action Taken: The Housing Authority agrees with this finding and will implement this recommendation within 120 days of this audit report.
Finance policy and procedure manual was updated with recommendations. See attached.
Finance policy and procedure manual was updated with recommendations. See attached.
Views of Responsible Officials: IJD acknowledges that at the Statement of Financial Position date it was holding Federal funds in excess of immediate operational need. This situation was rectified shortly after, in February 2025, when the funds were used to finance IJD’s risk pool to protect investi...
Views of Responsible Officials: IJD acknowledges that at the Statement of Financial Position date it was holding Federal funds in excess of immediate operational need. This situation was rectified shortly after, in February 2025, when the funds were used to finance IJD’s risk pool to protect investigative journalists. This use of funds was exactly in line with the proposal originally submitted to the Federal funder (USAID), and with the risk pool in place and fully financed IJD is able to continue recruiting new members and credibly offer them the protection envisioned in the original grant proposal. Name and Title of Responsible Official: Oliver Rivers, Chief Operating Officer Anticipated Completion Date: Not applicable
Root Cause Analysis: The root cause of this finding was a misapplication of the approved indirect cost rate to the appropriate Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC) base in connection with drawdown calculations. Although The EPI Center had an approved indirect cost rate and related policy in place, the ...
Root Cause Analysis: The root cause of this finding was a misapplication of the approved indirect cost rate to the appropriate Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC) base in connection with drawdown calculations. Although The EPI Center had an approved indirect cost rate and related policy in place, the operational procedures and system configurations necessary to consistently apply the methodology were still being refined and operationalized. The EPI Center notes that a formal, written Indirect Cost Rate Policy consistent with Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) was in place at the time of award. However, during the initial year of administering a federal award as fiscal agent, the procedures outlined in the policy were not fully operationalized. This resulted in a misapplication of the approved indirect cost rate. The overdraw resulted from applying the indirect cost rate to budgeted, rather than actual, direct expenditures. Management has since recalculated allowable indirect costs based on actual expenditures and has implemented enhanced controls to ensure accurate application of the MTDC base and compliance with federal requirements going forward. Response, with details: ☒Corrective Action Plan ☐Clarification Management acknowledges the misapplication of the approved indirect cost rate and has taken immediate steps to correct the calculation and ensure full alignment with federal requirements. Specifically, The EPI Center has recalculated indirect costs based on allowable expenditures within the Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC) base and is actively engaging with the U.S. Department of Education to determine the appropriate resolution of the overdrawn amount. Management confirms that all underlying expenditures charged to the program were allowable, allocable, and supported by appropriate documentation, and no unallowable costs were identified. Corrective Actions Management has implemented the following corrective actions to address the issue and strengthen internal controls: 1. Training and Capacity Building (Completed - April 2026) Finance staff and senior leadership have completed targeted training on the application of indirect cost requirements under Uniform Guidance to reinforce compliance expectations. 2. Recalculation and Resolution of Overdraw (Implementation Initiated) The EPI Center has recalculated allowable indirect costs by applying the restricted 8 percent indirect cost rate for Teacher and School Leader Incentive Program (TSL) grants to actual expenditures incurred during the reporting period. The program officer has been informed of the miscalculation and resulting overdraw. The EPI Center will follow all applicable agency protocols upon receiving formal guidance from the U.S. Department of Education. Management is actively coordinating with the U.S. Department of Education to resolve the calculated overdraw and will comply with all agency guidance, including repayment of any amounts determined to be unallowable. Controls are now in place to ensure that all future drawdowns are calculated based on the approved indirect cost rate applied to the MTDC base and are subject to documented review prior to submission. 3. Standardized Indirect Cost Calculation Worksheets (Completed - April 2026) A standardized indirect cost calculation worksheet will be required and reviewed prior to approval of all drawdown requests. 4. Independent Oversight (Completed – June 2025) The EPI Center has engaged a third-party controller who will review and independently validate indirect cost calculations prior to submission, providing an added layer of oversight and control. Responsible Party: Finance and Compliance Manager, Third-party Controller, CEO Timeline for Completion: May 2026
The City agrees with this finding and will train their project manager and/or department supervisor on the requirements of federal programs currently underway as well as require such training before a project commences in the future.
The City agrees with this finding and will train their project manager and/or department supervisor on the requirements of federal programs currently underway as well as require such training before a project commences in the future.
he City agrees with this finding. The delay in vendor payments resulted from the absence of formal written procedures governing the administration of federally funded projects and the responsibilities of project management staff. To address this finding, the City will develop and implement a compreh...
he City agrees with this finding. The delay in vendor payments resulted from the absence of formal written procedures governing the administration of federally funded projects and the responsibilities of project management staff. To address this finding, the City will develop and implement a comprehensive Project Management Policies and Procedures Manual establishing standardized processes for federal grant and loan administration, including cash management, documentation requirements, approval responsibilities, payment processing, and compliance with applicable federal regulations. The City will also require training for all employees and department supervisors responsible for administering federally funded projects before assuming project management responsibilities. Finance staff will monitor compliance with these procedures to help ensure timely payment of vendor invoices and adherence to federal cash management requirements.
Finding 2024-001 Lack of Internal Controls Over Cash Management Name of Contact Person: Galen Gilbert, First Chief Corrective Action Plan: In the prior fiscal year, Arctic Village Council (AVC) experienced delays in drawing down HUD funds due to staff transitions and turnover. While reimbursement wa...
Finding 2024-001 Lack of Internal Controls Over Cash Management Name of Contact Person: Galen Gilbert, First Chief Corrective Action Plan: In the prior fiscal year, Arctic Village Council (AVC) experienced delays in drawing down HUD funds due to staff transitions and turnover. While reimbursement was ultimately received, the funds were not deposited until after fiscal year-end, contributing to the reported cash management issue. To strengthen internal controls and avoid future delays, AVC will continue to follow its monthly reconciliation process to ensure that all grant expenditures are accurately aligned with drawdown activity and supported by eligible costs. In addition, AVC will explore establishing a line of credit (LOC) in FY2025 to help bridge timing gaps between expenditures and reimbursement cycles. This LOC would provide short-term liquidity support and help reduce reliance on general fund balances while awaiting federal reimbursements. Proposed Completion Date: September 30, 2025
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS We are resolving these deficiencies by leveraging the new Government ERP system, scheduled for launch in July 2026. This platform will provide the essential functionality to properly configure our Chart of Accounts, ensuring that all TANF and PTTA administrative expend...
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS We are resolving these deficiencies by leveraging the new Government ERP system, scheduled for launch in July 2026. This platform will provide the essential functionality to properly configure our Chart of Accounts, ensuring that all TANF and PTTA administrative expenditures are automatically segregated by federal award and Assistance Listing Number (ALN). This system will be the foundation for accurate, traceable, and reconcilable financial reporting, supported by robust internal controls and multi-level supervisory oversight. Action Steps: 1. ERP Chart of Accounts Configuration – Configure the ERP system with a granular Chart of Accounts that strictly segregates TANF and PTTA administrative expenditures, ensuring every transaction is coded to the correct federal grant and ALN. 2. Automated Reporting Workflow – Utilize the ERP's financial reporting modules to generate ACF-196TR reports directly from the General Ledger, ensuring reported expenditures are 100% traceable to source transactions. 3. Digital Reconciliation Workpaper – Require the ERP to generate an automated "Reconciliation Package" for every ACF-196TR submission, which links reported line items directly to General Ledger accounts, eliminating discrepancies. 4. Staff Training & ERP Stabilization – Execute comprehensive training for all finance staff on the new ERP accounting structure, reconciliation modules, and federal reporting requirements, ensuring the system is utilized for full audit compliance. IMPLEMENTATION DATE During Fiscal Year 2026-2027 RESPONSIBLE PERSON Eddie J. Burgos Auxiliary Administrator for Finance and Budget Carlos Martinez Colón Finance Director Vanessa Ayala Gerena Director of Budget
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS ADFAN appreciates the observations presented in the audit and acknowledges the importance of strengthening its reporting processes. The agency recognizes that staffing limitations within the Finance Division have affected the ability to perform timely reviews and ensur...
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS ADFAN appreciates the observations presented in the audit and acknowledges the importance of strengthening its reporting processes. The agency recognizes that staffing limitations within the Finance Division have affected the ability to perform timely reviews and ensure adequate segregation of duties. Additionally, the Finance Procedures Manual referenced during the audit was approved in 2009 and is currently undergoing a comprehensive revision to reflect the agency’s present operational structure and accounting practices. ADFAN is committed to improving its internal controls, enhancing staff training, and implementing the necessary measures to ensure full compliance with federal reporting requirements moving forward. IMPLEMENTATION DATE December 31, 2026 RESPONSIBLE PERSON Yazmín Cruz Colón, Budget Director
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS ADSEF is committed to establishing a comprehensive internal control framework. We are prioritizing the development of formal written policies, the standardization of regional data reporting, and the implementation of a rigorous oversight system to ensure all TANF progr...
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS ADSEF is committed to establishing a comprehensive internal control framework. We are prioritizing the development of formal written policies, the standardization of regional data reporting, and the implementation of a rigorous oversight system to ensure all TANF programmatic reports are complete, accurate, and filed on time. Action Steps: 1. Revise the Protocol of “TANF – Reporting Procedures Manual" that defines the full data lifecycle: collection, regional validation, quality control, supervisory review, and submission. 2. Regional Standardization – Establish mandatory, standardized templates for all regional offices to report programmatic data, ensuring uniformity and minimizing data entry errors. 3. Reporting Calendar & Oversight – Implement a master’s "Federal Reporting Calendar" that tracks all due dates for ACF-199, ACF-209, and other reports, with automated alerts sent to management 30 days prior to submission. 4. Training & Certification – Launch a mandatory training curriculum for all staff involved in reporting, focusing on 45 CFR Part 265 standards, data accuracy, and the consequences of reporting failures. IMPLEMENTATION DATE During Fiscal Year 2026-2027 RESPONSIBLE PERSON Blanca M. Medina Díaz Administrator Gerhil Medina Baez Auxiliary Administrator Operational Services Johana Hernandez Andaluz TANF Program Director
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS To resolve this, we are integrating these reporting requirements into the new Government ERP system, scheduled for launch in July 2026. This platform will provide the capability to generate accurate General Ledger data and automated financial reports, ensuring that all...
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS To resolve this, we are integrating these reporting requirements into the new Government ERP system, scheduled for launch in July 2026. This platform will provide the capability to generate accurate General Ledger data and automated financial reports, ensuring that all LIHEAP performance data is traceable to verified accounting sources and subject to multi-level supervisory approval workflows. Action Steps: 1. ERP-Driven Financial Reporting – Configure the ERP system to generate General Ledger reports that align precisely with LIHEAP financial data requirements. The ERP will serve as the "Single Source of Truth," eliminating discrepancies between accounting and reporting. 2. Automated Reconciliation Workflows – Utilize the ERP’s native reconciliation engine to automatically match expenditure records against reported LIHEAP budget obligations, ensuring figures are accurate and validated before submission. 3. Segregation of Duties (SOPs) – Formalize protocols where the ERP system enforces mandatory "Preparer-Approver-Certifier" roles. This ensures that performance data compiled by program staff is independently validated against ERP financial records by a supervisor. 4. Training on ERP Reporting – Train all staff on how to use ERP reporting modules for financial data extraction and the new protocols for reconciling this data with programmatic LIHEAP performance metrics. IMPLEMENTATION DATE During Fiscal Year 2026-2027 RESPONSIBLE PERSON Eddie J. Burgos Auxiliary Administrator for Finance and Budget Carlos Martinez Colón Finance Director Vanessa Ayala Gerena Director of Budget Nesvia Fontanez Marín Principal Accountant Federal Reports
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS To resolve these systemic issues, the Government of Puerto Rico is transitioning to a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, scheduled for live launch in July 2026. This modern platform will centralize our financial data and provide the necessary automation to ...
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS To resolve these systemic issues, the Government of Puerto Rico is transitioning to a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, scheduled for live launch in July 2026. This modern platform will centralize our financial data and provide the necessary automation to ensure that all federal reports are accurate, traceable to source documentation, and subject to multi-level supervisory approval workflows. Action Steps: 1. ERP Implementation & Workflow – Deploy the new ERP system to centralize all financial accounting. The system will be configured to require distinct user roles for the preparation, review, and certification of federal reports. 2. Automated Traceability – Utilize ERP reporting tools to ensure all administrative expenditures are linked to valid source documentation (e.g., invoices, payroll registers), providing a clear audit trail from report to General Ledger. 3. Implement report validation tool – No federal report may be submitted until an independent, designated official has digitally validated the report against source accounting records. 4. Reconciliation SOPs – Formalize a written SOP requiring monthly reconciliations of reported federal expenditures against the ERP database. These reconciliations will be retained as evidence of review for audit purposes. 5. Training & Accountability – Conduct mandatory training for all staff on new reporting workflows and the importance of segregation of duties, ensuring all personnel understand their responsibility in maintaining accurate financial data. IMPLEMENTATION DATE During Fiscal Year 2026-2027 RESPONSIBLE PERSON Eddie J. Burgos Auxiliary Administrator for Finance and Budget Carlos Martinez Colón Finance Director Vanessa Ayala Gerena Director of Budget
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS ADSEF is committed to a fundamental restructuring of our cash management lifecycle. By migrating drawdown processes into our ERP system, we will ensure that every request is supported by system-generated documentation, enforced through systematic segregation of duties,...
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS ADSEF is committed to a fundamental restructuring of our cash management lifecycle. By migrating drawdown processes into our ERP system, we will ensure that every request is supported by system-generated documentation, enforced through systematic segregation of duties, and fully reconciled against the general ledger in real-time. Action Step: 1. ERP-Based SOP Manual-Implement of the Procedure Manual of ERP system. This manual will supersede legacy documentation and clearly map every procedural step to a specific ERP function. 2. Systemic Segregation ERP is configurated to enforce mandatory "Preparer" and "Approver" roles. The system will prevent a single user from both creating and authorizing a drawdown request, ensuring logical segregation of duties. 3. Automated Reconciliation-Implement a system-level control where the ERP automatically reconciles drawdown requests. Any variance will trigger a "Pending Review" flag, preventing unauthorized processing. 4. Real-Time Supervisory Review-Require supervisors to conduct an audit of all drawdown documentation directly within the ERP interface. No request will be released for funding without a digital system approval following a reconciliation review IMPLEMENTATION DATE During Fiscal Year 2026-2027 RESPONSIBLE PERSON Eddie J. Burgos Auxiliary Administrator for Finance and Budget
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS ADFAN concurs with the finding. The agency acknowledges the requirement to maintain written procedures in accordance with 2 CFR §200.302, including procedures related to cash management and the determination of allowable costs under federal awards. The condition identi...
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS ADFAN concurs with the finding. The agency acknowledges the requirement to maintain written procedures in accordance with 2 CFR §200.302, including procedures related to cash management and the determination of allowable costs under federal awards. The condition identified was impacted by limited staffing resources within the Finance Area, which affected the timely completion and formalization of the required written procedures. In addition, the Finance Procedures Manual is currently under review and revision to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements and to strengthen internal controls over federal programs. As corrective action, ADFAN is completing the update and formalization of the Finance Procedures Manual, which will incorporate the written procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Upon completion, the revised manual will be formally approved, communicated to relevant personnel, and implemented across the agency. Management will also continue assessing staffing needs and resource allocation within the Finance Area to support the ongoing maintenance and monitoring of financial policies and procedures. IMPLEMENTATION DATE December 31, 2026 RESPONSIBLE PERSON Rafael López Arocho Assistant Administrator on Administration
« 1 4 5 7 8 27 »