Finding 544350 (2024-002)

-
Requirement
C
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-03-31
Audit: 350984
Organization: Voorhees University (SC)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The University drew down federal funds in advance of actual expenditures, violating cash management regulations.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 2 CFR section 200.305(b) regarding timely disbursement of funds.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Create a tracking tool to compare cumulative expenditures with drawdowns before requesting funds.

Finding Text

Condition and Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs. Minimum elapsed time for funds transfer is dependent upon the payment system/method used by the non-federal entity. The US Department of Education (ED) uses the G6 grants management platform, which is a module of the Education Central Automated Processing System (EDCAPS). Generally, funds requested from G6 process overnight and the funds are available in the non-federal entity’s account the next business day. The University has procedures in place to ensure that funds are drawn down from G6 only after they have been expended. However, we noted in one (1) instance where an amount appears to have been drawn down in advance. Context: The University made twenty nine (29) drawdowns of federal program funds during the fiscal year. In comparing the dates of the drawdowns with the accumulated program expenditures to each drawdown date, one (1) drawdown on 12/20/2023 exceeded accumulated program expenditures as of that date by $44,538. By 1/12/2024, the University had expended the amount advanced. Effect: The University was not in compliance with federal cash management regulations for a portion of the current fiscal year. Cause: Administrative oversight. Auditor's Recommendation: The University should development a spreadsheet or other tool similar to the one the auditor used to test cash management compliance that compares cumulative program expenditures to drawdowns. This tool should be updated prior to drawing down funds in order to ensure that drawdowns are limited to amounts expended at any point in time.

Corrective Action Plan

We concur with the recommendation. The one (1) instance of drawdown that exceeded the three day rule for drawdowns was an oversight on the part fo the institution. In addition, we will revise the spreadsheet used to track cumulative program expenditures against drawdowns.

Categories

Cash Management Subrecipient Monitoring Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.423 Supporting Effective Educator Development Program $8.18M
84.334 Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs $6.42M
84.031 Higher Education Institutional Aid $2.77M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $2.31M
84.411 Education Innovation and Research (formerly Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund) $2.09M
84.336 Teacher Quality Partnership Grants $1.79M
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $1.55M
81.104 Environmental Remediation and Waste Processing and Disposal $567,747
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $508,583
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $341,085
84.042 Trio Student Support Services $302,602
81.137 Minority Economic Impact $284,963
84.116 Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education $103,100
10.351 Rural Business Development Grant $97,922
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $72,406
10.766 Community Facilities Loans and Grants $70,322
16.753 Congressionally Recommended Awards $65,850
47.076 Stem Education (formerly Education and Human Resources) $59,220