Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
64,113
In database
Filtered Results
10,482
Matching current filters
Showing Page
5 of 420
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Significant Deficiency
Environmental Quality Incentives Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.912 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a formal control where someone other than the preparer documents their review of the financial and performance reports prior to submitting to the federal agency. This revi...
Environmental Quality Incentives Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.912 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a formal control where someone other than the preparer documents their review of the financial and performance reports prior to submitting to the federal agency. This review would include comparing the amounts in the report to the general ledger or other supporting documents. This review should be supported by documenting the signature and date prior to submission Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Status of corrective action: This finding recurred because the controls below were implemented in October 2025 and were not in place for the full 2025 audit period. We expect it to be resolved in the 2026 audit Report review: Under the Federal Grant Report Review and Submission Protocol, implemented in October 2025, someone other than the preparer compares each financial and performance report to the general ledger and supporting documents. Both the preparer and reviewer sign and date the review form before the report is submitted, and the form is filed in the project folder. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jill Matchett, Grants Manager through June 2026, Lori Hall, Grants Manager June 2026 - present Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Implemented October 2025; expected to be resolved in the audit for the year ending December 31, 2026
Environmental Quality Incentives Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.912 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a formal control where someone other than the preparer documents their review of the claim prior to submitting to the federal agency. This review would include comparing t...
Environmental Quality Incentives Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.912 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a formal control where someone other than the preparer documents their review of the claim prior to submitting to the federal agency. This review would include comparing the amounts in the report to the general ledger or other supporting documents. This review should be supported by documenting the signature and date prior to submission. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Status of corrective action: This finding recurred because the controls below were implemented in October 2025 and were not in place for the full 2025 audit period. We expect it to be resolved in the 2026 audit. Claim preparation and independent review: For each claim, the Grants Manager or designee prepares a Claim/Billing Approval Form and routes it, with the supporting documentation, to the Project Manager. The Project Manager, who does not prepare the claim, compares the amounts on the claim to the general ledger and to supporting documentation such as payroll allocation reports and vendor invoices, and resolves any differences with the preparer before approving. Signature and date prior to submission: Both the preparer and the reviewer electronically sign and date the Claim/Billing Approval Form. The claim is not initiated in the funder portal until the form is fully approved, so the documented approval date will always precede the submission date. Documentation and monitoring: The approved form, supporting documentation, and portal submission confirmation are saved together in the Organization's grant files. A member of management will periodically review a sample of submitted claims to confirm that the review was completed, signed, and dated before submission. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jill Matchett, Grants Manager through June 2026, Lori Hall, Grants Manager June 2026 - present Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Implemented October 2025; expected to be resolved in the audit for the year ending December 31, 2026
Environmental Quality Incentives Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.912 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a compensating control to formally document their review and approval over time & effort studies and allocations. This review would include comparing the payroll processed...
Environmental Quality Incentives Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.912 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a compensating control to formally document their review and approval over time & effort studies and allocations. This review would include comparing the payroll processed and allocated to the grant to the approved time and effort documentation by funding source to ensure payroll costs are not being overcharged. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Status of corrective action: This finding recurred in 2025 due to the timing of implementation, not because the corrective actions were ineffective. The corrective actions described below were fully in place by October 2025, after the start of the January 1 to December 31, 2025 audit period, so the controls were not in operation for the full year. The controls have been in operation since implementation, and the Organization expects this finding to be resolved in the audit for the year ending December 31, 2026, which will be the first audit period in which the controls operate for the entire year. Time and effort studies: Beginning in September 2025, the Organization conducts monthly time studies by position. Management reviews and approves each time study, and the approval is documented and dated by email to the Outsourced Accountant. When actual time spent deviates from the most recent time study, payroll allocations are adjusted so that charges to each funding source reflect actual effort. Payroll allocation reconciliation (compensating control): Each month, before payroll costs are included in a claim for reimbursement, the Director of Operations or a designee independent of payroll preparation compares the payroll processed and allocated to the Environmental Quality Incentives Program award to the approved time and effort documentation by funding source. Any difference is investigated and corrected in the general ledger before the costs are claimed, so that payroll charged to the award does not exceed the effort supported. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Angie Sullivan, Director of Operations Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Implemented October 2025; expected to be resolved in the audit for the year ending December 31, 2026
Agency will develop a written process for submitting FSRS as required to include tracking schedule by subcontract to ensure timely submissions within one month following the signing of a new award. In Addition, the agency has appointed a cost specialist to carry out this responsibility with the Head...
Agency will develop a written process for submitting FSRS as required to include tracking schedule by subcontract to ensure timely submissions within one month following the signing of a new award. In Addition, the agency has appointed a cost specialist to carry out this responsibility with the Head Start Director serving as back up. The report is submitted to the CFO and filed in the agency’s fiscal electronic filing system in preparation for the annual audit. The FSRS for FY2026 is complete and timely submitted in alignment with subcontract renewals.
MEDA concurs with the recommendation. To ensure full compliance with internal control and federal award requirements, MEDA is implementing an updated review workflow for all financial and performance reports prior to submission. Under this process, designated reviewers will complete and sign a stand...
MEDA concurs with the recommendation. To ensure full compliance with internal control and federal award requirements, MEDA is implementing an updated review workflow for all financial and performance reports prior to submission. Under this process, designated reviewers will complete and sign a standardized digital approval checklist or retain documented email/system approvals accompanying each report and its supporting documentation. These record files will be systematically maintained in MEDA’s central repository in alignment with our record retention policy. Implementation is targeted for completion by December 31, 2026 under the direction of the Chief Financial Officer.
Finding 1239071 (2025-005)
Material Weakness 2025
Finding number: 2026-005 - Noncompliance with Required Project Deliverable Timeline Condition: Blue Krewe did not complete the required rooftop solar installation within the established Year 1 performance period. Management represented that it has remained in communication with the City regarding th...
Finding number: 2026-005 - Noncompliance with Required Project Deliverable Timeline Condition: Blue Krewe did not complete the required rooftop solar installation within the established Year 1 performance period. Management represented that it has remained in communication with the City regarding the status of the project and that no concerns have been raised by the City; however, written documentation from the City approving the delay was not available. Views of responsible official: Management acknowledges that the rooftop solar installation was not completed within the original Year 1 performance period. Management has been communicating with the City regarding the project and will continue to coordinate with the City regarding completion of the required deliverable and obtain and retain written documentation of any approved changes to the project timeline. Expected Completion date: November 30, 2026
Finding 1239070 (2025-004)
Material Weakness 2025
Finding number: 2026-004 - Absence of Written Standards of Conduct Condition: The Organization had not adopted written standards of conduct addressing conflicts of interest and employee conduct requirements applicable to federal awards. Views of responsible official: Management agrees with the findi...
Finding number: 2026-004 - Absence of Written Standards of Conduct Condition: The Organization had not adopted written standards of conduct addressing conflicts of interest and employee conduct requirements applicable to federal awards. Views of responsible official: Management agrees with the finding. The Organization will develop and adopt written standards of conduct addressing conflicts of interest and other ethical requirements applicable to federal awards and will communicate those standards to employees and Board members. Expected Completion date: November 30, 2026
Trempealeau County, being a small county, has limited resources in personnel to accomplish a multi-verification in the reporting process. We will use additional current employees in-house to do the verification to make sure the reporting is accurate before submitting. The 2026 annual report was subm...
Trempealeau County, being a small county, has limited resources in personnel to accomplish a multi-verification in the reporting process. We will use additional current employees in-house to do the verification to make sure the reporting is accurate before submitting. The 2026 annual report was submitted by the due date. Responsible Person: Mary Martin, County Clerk Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2026
Corrective Action Plan Regarding the child abuse and neglect registry check: Corrective Action Plan: It was found that four case files did not include a printed copy of the child abuse and neglect registry check, a checklist showing it was run was included in the cases. The child abuse and neglect r...
Corrective Action Plan Regarding the child abuse and neglect registry check: Corrective Action Plan: It was found that four case files did not include a printed copy of the child abuse and neglect registry check, a checklist showing it was run was included in the cases. The child abuse and neglect registry check were conducted when the homes were first certified as Foster Homes and were included in the Foster Home case record. Foster Home case records are purged after eight years of the home being a closed Foster Home. Currently the printed child abuse and neglect registry check is included in the Adoption Subsidy case file. Action Date 2022 Final Implementation Date 12/31/2039 Name And Phone No. Of Person Responsible For Implementation Lori Rhein (631) 854-9330
Corrective Action Plan It was found that eight cases did not contain evidence in the case record that would indicate the participant’s categorical eligibility. A memo will be distributed to all staff as a reminder on the need to adequately document the case record to support the eligibility determin...
Corrective Action Plan It was found that eight cases did not contain evidence in the case record that would indicate the participant’s categorical eligibility. A memo will be distributed to all staff as a reminder on the need to adequately document the case record to support the eligibility determination to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations and the need to scan all documents to IEDR in a timely manner. A separate memo will be distributed to all supervisory staff as a reminder on their need to ensure the case is properly documented and stored in IEDR when reviewing the case record for eligibility determination. The agency will monitor training classes offered by OTDA throughout the year to assign staff to attend to reinforce and strengthen their knowledge on properly documenting and determining eligibility for program. Action Date 9/14/2026 Final Implementation Date 9/30/2027 Name And Phone No. Of Person Responsible For Implementation Bryan Bogad – 631-854-9880
Corrective Action Plan It was found that four cases did not contain evidence in the case record that would indicate the participant’s categorical eligibility. A memo will be distributed to all staff as a reminder on the need to adequately document the case record to support the eligibility determina...
Corrective Action Plan It was found that four cases did not contain evidence in the case record that would indicate the participant’s categorical eligibility. A memo will be distributed to all staff as a reminder on the need to adequately document the case record to support the eligibility determination to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations and the need to scan all documents to IEDR in a timely manner. A separate memo will be distributed to all supervisory staff as a reminder on their need to ensure the case is properly documented and stored in IEDR when reviewing the case record for eligibility determination. The agency will monitor training classes offered by OTDA throughout the year to assign staff to attend to reinforce and strengthen their knowledge on properly documenting and determining eligibility for program. Action Date 9/14/2026 Final Implementation Date 9/30/2027 Name And Phone No. Of Person Responsible For Implementation Bryan Bogad – 631-854-9880
Corrective Action Plan Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Finding 2025-001 Name of Contact Person: Annette Ange, Executive Director Corrective Action: We will implement proper internal control procedures for the Public and Indian Housing program elegibility requirements. Mange...
Corrective Action Plan Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Finding 2025-001 Name of Contact Person: Annette Ange, Executive Director Corrective Action: We will implement proper internal control procedures for the Public and Indian Housing program elegibility requirements. Mangement has established a checklist for applications and will establish checklists for move-ins and move-outs. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately
Contact Person Derek Johnson, Executive Director Corrective Action Plan The Authority will review its policies and procedures over program compliance requirements and continue to provide occupancy training to staff to prevent future exceptions. Planned Completion Date for CAP December 31, 2026
Contact Person Derek Johnson, Executive Director Corrective Action Plan The Authority will review its policies and procedures over program compliance requirements and continue to provide occupancy training to staff to prevent future exceptions. Planned Completion Date for CAP December 31, 2026
Contact Person Derek Johnson, Executive Director Corrective Action Plan The Authority will review its policies and procedures over program compliance requirements and continue to provide occupancy training to staff to prevent future exceptions. Planned Completion Date for CAP December 31, 2026
Contact Person Derek Johnson, Executive Director Corrective Action Plan The Authority will review its policies and procedures over program compliance requirements and continue to provide occupancy training to staff to prevent future exceptions. Planned Completion Date for CAP December 31, 2026
Federal Program: Urban and Community Forest Improvement Program – Inflation Reduction Act Assistance Listing Number: 10.727 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Samory Ligondé, Controller Management Response: Management concurs with...
Federal Program: Urban and Community Forest Improvement Program – Inflation Reduction Act Assistance Listing Number: 10.727 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Samory Ligondé, Controller Management Response: Management concurs with the finding and recognizes the importance of timely and complete reporting under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) and 2 CFR Part 170. The Organization maintains written policies addressing federal award administration, including applicable FFATA reporting requirements. In response to the matters identified during the audit, management has strengthened the procedures and controls supporting implementation of these requirements. Responsibility for identifying subawards subject to FFATA reporting has been assigned jointly to the Controller and the applicable program lead responsible for administration of the federal award. This approach is intended to combine centralized financial and compliance oversight with the program-level knowledge necessary to identify reportable subaward activity; however, the Controller is ultimately responsible for coordinating and ensuring completion of the required federal FFATA reporting. Management has reviewed the subawards associated with the major federal program audited and has submitted all previously outstanding FFATA reports identified through that review. In addition, management has implemented a supervisory review process to verify that required FFATA reports are submitted within prescribed deadlines. As part of this process, finance staff, in coordination with the applicable program lead, will periodically reconcile the organization’s subaward agreements and related records to FFATA information reflected in SAM.gov. Lastly, Management will also maintain appropriate documentation of reportable subawards and completed submissions to support ongoing monitoring and supervisory review. Management believes these actions, which were completed by the end of the audit process, appropriately address the matters identified in the finding and strengthen the organization’s existing controls over FFATA compliance.
FINDING 2025-010 Finding Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions – Assessment System Security Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Jenna Harrington, Ahnaf Tahmid & Marlaina Johns Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 574-393-6000, jharringt...
FINDING 2025-010 Finding Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions – Assessment System Security Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Jenna Harrington, Ahnaf Tahmid & Marlaina Johns Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 574-393-6000, jharrington@sbcsc.k12.in.us , atahmid@sbcsc.k12.in.us, mjohns2@sbcsc.k12.in.us Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Established a comprehensive testing security and operations plan featuring: • Role-specific scenario-based training for Coordinators, Proctors, and IT. • Mandatory signed non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) due annually by September 30th. • Retention of sign-in sheets, training slides, and make-up accountability quizzes. • Clear escalation protocols for reporting testing irregularities. Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2027
Finding 1238773 (2025-003)
Material Weakness 2025
Finding Number: 2025-003 Finding Title: Eligibility - MAXIS Program: Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Quinn Jaeger, Social Services Director Karen Amundson, Social Services Supervisor Corrective Action Planned: Clay County Social Services will provide targeted training addre...
Finding Number: 2025-003 Finding Title: Eligibility - MAXIS Program: Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Quinn Jaeger, Social Services Director Karen Amundson, Social Services Supervisor Corrective Action Planned: Clay County Social Services will provide targeted training addressing the areas identified in the 2025 audit, with particular emphasis on Social Security number documentation and the accurate verification, documentation, and entry of asset information in MAXIS. Policy updates and related documentation expectations will continue to be reviewed during monthly staff meetings. The lead eligibility worker will continue conducting random internal reviews of MAXIS cases. Review results will be discussed directly with each worker so identified errors can be corrected, expectations clarified, and individualized coaching or additional training provided. Results will also be monitored for recurring error patterns that may require broader training, procedural changes, or performance follow-up. Because the department experienced staff turnover during the audit period, training and quality control will remain ongoing. New employees will receive focused instruction on MAXIS documentation and data-entry requirements, while established staff will continue to receive refresher training and case-specific coaching. Supervisory and lead-worker review will be used to reinforce consistent expectations across the team. Clay County has also begun using Al-assisted policy guidance to help staff more quickly locate and reference relevant state and federal eligibility requirements, This resource supports policy research and staff learning but does not make eligibility determinations or replace required verification, supervisory consultation, human judgment, or employee accountability. In addition, Clay County is partnering with the State of Minnesota to pilot the Mn Benefits-to-MAXIS application process. The pilot is intended to streamline the transfer of application information into MAXIS and reduce duplicate manual data entry. Reducing unnecessary keystrokes should decrease opportunities for human data-entry errors and allow eligibility workers to focus more attention on verifying information and accurately applying program requirements. Clay County will evaluate the pilot's impact and incorporate effective practices into its internal workflow as the state rollout progresses. Anticipated Completion Date: The enhanced training, case-review, and policy-support procedures will be fully implemented by December 31, 2026. Case reviews, staff training, monitoring, coaching, and participation in the state's MnBenefits-to-MAXIS are already underway and will continue to be utilized.
Finding 1238772 (2025-002)
Material Weakness 2025
Finding Number: 2025-002 Finding Title: Eligibility - METS Program: 93.778 Grants to States for Medicaid Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Quinn Jaeger, Social Services Director Mika la Wodarek, Social Services Supervisor Corrective Action Planned: Clay County Social Services...
Finding Number: 2025-002 Finding Title: Eligibility - METS Program: 93.778 Grants to States for Medicaid Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Quinn Jaeger, Social Services Director Mika la Wodarek, Social Services Supervisor Corrective Action Planned: Clay County Social Services will continue utilizing internal case reviews to monitor the accuracy and completeness of METS eligibility documentation. Reviews will be completed for eligibility workers and discussed directly with each worker. Identified errors will be corrected, and individualized coaching or additional training will be provided as appropriate. Review results will also be monitored for recurring patterns that may require broader team guidance or training. The department will provide continued instruction focused on the areas identified in the 2025 audit, including Social Security number documentation, citizenship verification, and accurate income documentation. Clay County has also begun using an internal Al-assisted policy research tool to help eligibility staff more quickly locate and reference applicable state and federal policy provisions when questions arise. This tool is intended to support efficient policy research only. It does not make eligibility determinations or replace staff judgment, required verification, supervisory consultation, or employee responsibility for accurately applying program policy. These measures will strengthen the existing review process while recognizing the size and complexity of Clay County's METS workload. During 2025, Clay County administered 16,604 active METS recipients. The audit identified four exceptions in its sample of 40 recipient files. Clay County takes each exception seriously and will continue refining its training, policy-reference, case-review, and coaching practices to reduce future errors. Anticipated Completion Date: Al-assisted research tool has been implemented immediately and is currently in use now. All healthcare eligibility staff will have cases randomly reviewed prior to December 31, 2026, with all policy support, monitoring, and corrective coaching continuing after each staff's review but also occurring before December 31, 2026.
Finding 2025-002 Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance – Special Tests Federal Program: 93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Year: 2025 Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Condition – The C...
Finding 2025-002 Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance – Special Tests Federal Program: 93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Year: 2025 Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Condition – The Contract ID 5H79SM083419 required the two key personnel to spend at least 50% level of Effort on the grant. We noted that the two Key personnel spent 25% Level of effort and 15% level of effort, respectively, during the fiscal year which constituted a greater than 25% reduction in planned effort. Management did not submit an award amendment regarding the reduction in effort. Corrective Action Plan – Henry Ford Health agrees with this finding. Henry Ford Health will strengthen monitoring of key personnel effort commitments and enhance procedures to ensure significant reductions in effort are identified, reviewed, and communicated to the sponsoring agency when prior approval is required. Anticipated Completion Date – December 31, 2026. Contact Person – Doug Clark, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.
Statement of Condition and Criteria The Authority did not consistently perform required participant recertifications and certification updates within the Housing Choice Voucher (HGV) and Moving to Work (MTW) programs. During testing, we identified instances where participant files and Forms HUD-5005...
Statement of Condition and Criteria The Authority did not consistently perform required participant recertifications and certification updates within the Housing Choice Voucher (HGV) and Moving to Work (MTW) programs. During testing, we identified instances where participant files and Forms HUD-50058 were not updated to reflect current household information when certification actions were required. Recommendation We recommend the Authority strengthen monitoring controls over recertification and eligibility processing within both the HGV and MTW programs to ensure participant information is updated timely and eligibility determinations are supported by current household information. Corrective Action - Quality Control & Monitoring Enhancements To strengthen internal controls and ensure consistent file compliance within the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) and Moving to Work (MTW) programs, The Greenville Housing Authority (TGHA) is executing a structural reorganization of department staff. • Dedicated Compliance Personnel: Final restructuring of the current HGV department will be completed by October 31, 2026. This includes the onboarding of a dedicated Compliance Specialist by January 2027. This role will strictly focus on quality control, preventing overlooked regulatory procedures, verifying income calculations, and ensuring complete file documentation. • Real-Time Quality Control Reviews: The Compliance Specialist will implement a proactive file-checking system, auditing annual and interim recertifications, and any other occurrences, e.g., moves, that a new certification is required in real time prior to final Form HUD-50058 transmission. This allows immediate correction of deficiencies and prevents recurring systemic errors. • Management Oversight & Target Training: Compliance reporting will be reviewed at least monthly by the Director of HCV and the HCV Lead Specialists. These monthly reviews will track error rates, identify chronic deficiencies, and directly inform the department's ongoing staff training needs. TGHA anticipates fully executing these new compliance review processes and workflows by April 30, 2027.
2025-002 – Housing Voucher Cluster: Special Tests and Provisions – Reasonable Rent – ALN #14.871 Significant Deficiency Criteria: The PHA administrative plan must state the method used by the PHA to determine that the rent to owner is reasonable in comparison to rent for other comparable unassisted ...
2025-002 – Housing Voucher Cluster: Special Tests and Provisions – Reasonable Rent – ALN #14.871 Significant Deficiency Criteria: The PHA administrative plan must state the method used by the PHA to determine that the rent to owner is reasonable in comparison to rent for other comparable unassisted units. The PHA determination must consider unit attributes such as the location, quality, size, unit type, and age of the unit, and any amenities, housing services, maintenance, and utilities provided by the owner. The PHA must determine that the rent to the owner is reasonable at the time of initial leasing. Also, the PHA must determine reasonable rent during the term of the contract (a) before any increase in the rent to owner, and (b) at the HAP contract anniversary if there is a 10 percent decrease in the published Fair Market Rent in effect 60 days before the HAP contract anniversary. The PHA must maintain records to document the basis for the determination that rent to owner is a reasonable rent (initially and during the term of the HAP contract) (24 CFR sections 982.4, 982.54(d)(15), 982.158(f)(7), and 982.507). Condition: The Authority was unable to provide documentation of appropriate evaluation of rent reasonableness procedures for 3 of 22 selections made. The 3 selections specifically were instances where the evaluations were during the term of the contract when the circumstance indicated an evaluation should be completed. Cause: The Authority did not properly ensure documentation was maintained for rent evaluation reasonableness during the transitions from physical files to digital file maintenance. Effect or Potential Effect: Because documentation could not be located we were unable to determine if the evaluations of rent reasonableness was appropriately completed for 3 of the 22 selections tested. Known Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendations: We would recommend the Authority implement a process to ensure all rent reasonableness evaluations are completed as required, and documentation to support the evaluation process and conclusion is appropriately maintained within the tenant and/or property files. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding outlined and is working to implement necessary changes to ensure compliance and appropriate internal controls are operating effectively.
Finding Number: 2025-006 Finding Title: Eligibility – METS Program: 93.778 Grants to States for Medicaid Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Berit Spors, Health and Human Services Director Corrective Action Planned: McLeod County recognizes the importance of proper information ...
Finding Number: 2025-006 Finding Title: Eligibility – METS Program: 93.778 Grants to States for Medicaid Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Berit Spors, Health and Human Services Director Corrective Action Planned: McLeod County recognizes the importance of proper information to be maintained in the METS system to ensure eligibility to qualified individuals for Medicaid. The two cases that were addressed were errors in the METS system caused by periodic date match. It would be helpful if DHS would issue discrepancy reports for the METS system similar to the MAXIS report to catch these errors. County Social Services staff will audit cases periodically to catch these errors in the systems. Anticipated Completion Date: These cases have been resolved as of September 2026.
Management deposited the delinquent required deposits of $270,000 to the replacement reserve in February 2026.
Management deposited the delinquent required deposits of $270,000 to the replacement reserve in February 2026.
2025-002 Policies and Procedures for Food Inventory Management Corrective action planned: Anticipated completion date: Contact person responsible for corrective action: Pmtners INW will formalize the procedures we have in place as a Board approved policy. The policy will cover the treatment for all ...
2025-002 Policies and Procedures for Food Inventory Management Corrective action planned: Anticipated completion date: Contact person responsible for corrective action: Pmtners INW will formalize the procedures we have in place as a Board approved policy. The policy will cover the treatment for all types of inventories, including federal non-cash programs. We will provide a draft policy to the Financial Committee at the 9/22 meeting prior to board-wide approval afterward. The policy will be acknowledged at least annually and after key staff turnover. Target: 9/24/2026 Justin Carlile JustinC@partnersinw.org
« 1 3 4 6 7 420 »