Ocosta School District No. 172 September 1, 2024 through August 31, 2025 This schedule presents the corrective action planned by the District for findings reported in this report in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Pri...
Ocosta School District No. 172 September 1, 2024 through August 31, 2025 This schedule presents the corrective action planned by the District for findings reported in this report in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Finding ref number: 2025-01 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Robert Butler 2580 S. Montesano St. Westport, WA 98595 360.268.9125 ext. 1004 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: The District acknowledges the finding and appreciates the opportunity to strengthen our documentation practices related to suspension and debarment verification. We would like to clarify that the District did perform suspension and debarment checks through SAM.gov for the vendors in question on an annual basis. While these procedures were consistently completed, the District did not retain independent documentation of those checks. The District relied on SAM.gov as the authoritative federal system of record, including its historical tracking and notification features, rather than maintaining locally stored or printed copies. At the time, staff were not aware that compliance requirements required retention of documentation evidencing these checks. As a result, this finding reflects a documentation deficiency rather than the absence of the control itself. As confirmed during the audit, all vendors tested were in good standing and not suspended or debarred. Therefore, the District was not at risk of contracting with an ineligible vendor, and no questioned costs were identified.