Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,543
In database
Filtered Results
23,815
Matching current filters
Showing Page
174 of 953
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Corrective Action Plan – Single Audit Finding Entity Name: Journey’s End Refugee Services, Inc. Audit Period: For the year Ended December 31, 2024 Finding Reference Number: 19.510 Federal Program: U.S. Refugee Admissions Program 1. Audit Finding Summary (Describe the audit finding and the specific n...
Corrective Action Plan – Single Audit Finding Entity Name: Journey’s End Refugee Services, Inc. Audit Period: For the year Ended December 31, 2024 Finding Reference Number: 19.510 Federal Program: U.S. Refugee Admissions Program 1. Audit Finding Summary (Describe the audit finding and the specific noncompliance identified by the auditor.) Failure to Submit monthly financial reports by the 15th of each month following, resulting in noncompliance with grant agreement. 2. Root Cause (Explain the underlying reasons for the finding, such as process gaps, training issues, or lack of controls.) Lack of process, including a tracking mechanism that identifies due dates and completion dates of all reports due. 3. Corrective Actions: A) Create a report in excel to track grant reports deadlines. B) Weekly review of the report by the Grants and Finance committee. C) Purchase and implementation of grants monitoring software. 4. Monitoring Plan (Describe how the implementation of corrective actions will be monitored and evaluated.) New Chief Financial Officer will review the action items and monitor the progress with the Chief Operating Officer monthly.
Replacement Reserves Funding Auditee agrees that twelve monthly payments were not made to the replacement reserve for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. We recommend that management make an additional deposit funding the shortfall as soon as possible to fully fund the replacement reserve. Audi...
Replacement Reserves Funding Auditee agrees that twelve monthly payments were not made to the replacement reserve for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. We recommend that management make an additional deposit funding the shortfall as soon as possible to fully fund the replacement reserve. Auditee has submitted a HUD-9250 request for the suspension of deposits to the replacement reserve account for 2025 and will fund the shortfall as soon as adequate funding from operations is available and will consult with HUD for future use on operations.
Unauthorized Replacement Reserve Withdrawal Auditee agrees that an unauthorized withdrawal of $6,720.61 was made from replacement reserve account. We recommend that management evaluate its internal controls and implement policies to mitigate the chances of withdrawing funds from the replacement rese...
Unauthorized Replacement Reserve Withdrawal Auditee agrees that an unauthorized withdrawal of $6,720.61 was made from replacement reserve account. We recommend that management evaluate its internal controls and implement policies to mitigate the chances of withdrawing funds from the replacement reserve account without HUD approval. Auditee has submitted a funds authorization withdrawal request for the replacement reserve withdrawal. Funds were transferred to the replacement reserve account and the Auditee is in the process of subsequently gaining approval.
Security Deposit Funding Auditee agrees that the security deposit liability account is underfunded. We recommend that management funds the shortfall and created a better system of controls to ensure no future occurrences. Auditee plans to evaluate its internal controls and implement policies to miti...
Security Deposit Funding Auditee agrees that the security deposit liability account is underfunded. We recommend that management funds the shortfall and created a better system of controls to ensure no future occurrences. Auditee plans to evaluate its internal controls and implement policies to mitigate underfunding of the security deposit account and has funded the shortfall. Transfer of $1,271 to security deposit account was made to fully fund the account.
Timely Submission of Required Reporting Management understands the need to be in compliance with the filing requirements and will ensure that these reports are filed timely. The filings have been subsequently completed with the FAC system.
Timely Submission of Required Reporting Management understands the need to be in compliance with the filing requirements and will ensure that these reports are filed timely. The filings have been subsequently completed with the FAC system.
Recommendation – The Project should ensure the surplus cash calculation is made in a manner that allows for a timely deposit of any required deposit to the residual receipts account. If there are cash flow issues preventing the deposit from taking place, the Project needs to contact HUD and request ...
Recommendation – The Project should ensure the surplus cash calculation is made in a manner that allows for a timely deposit of any required deposit to the residual receipts account. If there are cash flow issues preventing the deposit from taking place, the Project needs to contact HUD and request a waiver if allowed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions –Management will calculate an estimated surplus cash calculation amount and deposit them into the residual receipts account within the required time frame. Name and Title of Responsible Official – Sabine Cox, Comptroller Anticipated Completion Date – Once the funds are received.
View Audit 369603 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation – Management needs to monitor the reserve for replacement account and when funds are borrowed, they need to comply with the terms of the agreement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management will track any loans from the Replacement Reserve account and ...
Recommendation – Management needs to monitor the reserve for replacement account and when funds are borrowed, they need to comply with the terms of the agreement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management will track any loans from the Replacement Reserve account and reimburse the Replacement Reserve account once the HUD subsidy is received. Name and Title of Responsible Official – Sabine Cox, Comptroller Anticipated Completion Date – Deposited repayment September 26, 2025
View Audit 369603 Questioned Costs: $1
Condition: During the tenant file testing for the Public Housing program, we reviewed a sample of forty tenant files and identified deficiencies in the Authority's documentation and reporting practices: 1. For two tenants the rent amounts did not match the amounts documented on the HUD-50058 forms. ...
Condition: During the tenant file testing for the Public Housing program, we reviewed a sample of forty tenant files and identified deficiencies in the Authority's documentation and reporting practices: 1. For two tenants the rent amounts did not match the amounts documented on the HUD-50058 forms. 2. For seven tenants the unit inspection forms were not available. Questioned Costs: $3,251 Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority enhance its internal control environment to ensure compliance with HUD requirements under Assistance Listing 14.850. This includes implementing procedures to verify that all required documentation-such as Unit Inspection records-is consistently obtained and retained in tenant files. Additionally, the Authority should establish a reconciliation process to confirm that rent amounts charged align with those calculated on the HUD-50058 forms. Planned Corrective Action: During 2024 there were some employee changes in Public Housing management as well as a computer virus that affected our server. We have implemented new procedures to include a hard copy of required documents as well as an electronic copy. The Senior Public Housing manager will also be conducting file reviews to verify that these records are complete for each tenant file. The housing authority changed software vendors during 2024. The software is designed to calculate rent amounts and report that amount on the HUD 50058 form. The conversion between the two software systems led to inaccurate information on the HUD- 50058. This should not be an ongoing issue as the conversion has been completed and corrections made.
View Audit 369599 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024-001: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 & 14.EHV Noncompliance – N. Special Tests and Provisions - Housing Quality Standards Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements:...
Finding 2024-001: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 & 14.EHV Noncompliance – N. Special Tests and Provisions - Housing Quality Standards Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: HQS Inspections. Per the Authority's HCV Admin Plan, the PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least annually to determine if the unit meets HQS standards and the PHA must conduct quality control re-inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.405(b)). These inspection reports are required to be maintained and available for examination at the time of audit. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management there were inspection reports that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: Of a sample size of thirty-three (33) units, two (2) units did not have annual HQS inspections performed timely. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: $5,004 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Housing Voucher Cluster is in non-compliance with the with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will reasonably assure compliance related to HQS inspections in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority has recognized the significant deficiency in the Housing Voucher Cluster Programs and will implement internal control procedures that will ensure compliance with federal regulations. Joanna Lara, Director of Housing Administration is responsible for ensuring proper internal controls are in place to prevent significant deficiencies and material weaknesses from occurring by December 31, 2025.
View Audit 369595 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024-002 – Material Weakness – Inadequate Documentation Condition We selected a sample of both payroll and nonpayroll related expenditures for controls and compliance. During our testing of payroll expenditures, there were five instances out of 11 in which a timesheet or other documentation ...
Finding 2024-002 – Material Weakness – Inadequate Documentation Condition We selected a sample of both payroll and nonpayroll related expenditures for controls and compliance. During our testing of payroll expenditures, there were five instances out of 11 in which a timesheet or other documentation could not be located to support a payment made to an employee. During our testing of nonpayroll related expenditures, there were three instances out of 18 in which an invoice for the selected expenditure lacked proper documented approvals. Recommendation All employees in the Finance Department and associated with any federal program must be adequately trained in overall federal regulations and guidance as well as other requirements associated with each federal award. All such employees must read the grant-related policies and internal control policies. Management should check to ensure all federal grant expenditures are properly approved and have supporting documentation. Management’s Corrective Action Plan The Corporation has experienced staff turnover which resulted in process challenges. Nevertheless, the Corporation will take this recommendation and implement revised procedures to ensure that the Finance Department and other pertinent Corporation resources receive federal regulations and guidance training, incorporate available systems and technology capabilities available from the technology service providers, and adopt best practices. Finance will schedule regular grant reviews, inclusive of program expenditures. Contact Person: Richonda Pelzer, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2026
View Audit 369593 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024-001 – Material Weakness – Accounting Discipline and Recordkeeping Condition During the audit of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, Impact Services Corporation and Affiliates‘ (the “Corporation's”) management was unable to provide timely year-end trial balances in accordance with U.S....
Finding 2024-001 – Material Weakness – Accounting Discipline and Recordkeeping Condition During the audit of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, Impact Services Corporation and Affiliates‘ (the “Corporation's”) management was unable to provide timely year-end trial balances in accordance with U.S. GAAP. An accurate year-end trial balance was not provided in a timely manner, and management continued to make a significant number of adjustments after the year-end trial balance had been provided to the auditors, resulting in significant time by management and the auditors to complete the audit. As a result, the fiscal year 2024 financial statements were not finalized in time to meet the deadlines noted in 2 CFR Section 200.512(a)(1). In addition, during the audit it was discovered that certain account balances and transactions were not properly recorded in the prior year, resulting in a prior period adjustment to correct the beginning balances as of July 1, 2023. While reconciling accounts payable and accrued expenses as of June 30, 2024, management discovered that the accounts payable balance was incorrect dating back to 2023. The Corporation changed accounting software packages during the year ended June 30, 2023 and during the transition of accounting packages, an accounts payable balance totaling $390,229 transferred into the new software. The invoices representing this balance were also entered into the accounts payable module and transferred into the general ledger module, resulting in a double recording of the accounts payable balance and overstatement of expenses by $390,229 in fiscal year 2023. Recommendation We recommend that management continue to review and update the Corporation's policies and procedures to ensure that the trial balance is accurate throughout the year. Account reconciliations and supporting schedules should be prepared and reviewed on a monthly basis. The accounting books and records should be closed timely at year end and thoroughly reviewed. Management’s Corrective Action Plan In February 2025, a new Chief Financial Officer was hired and immediately launched a full evaluation of the Accounting and Finance department. Her efforts have included restructuring staff, restarting the fiscal year 2024 audit, implementing new financial policies, and launching a credit card purchasing system with embedded controls. Within six months, she has established new internal controls, enhanced financial reporting, and introduced staff training protocols. To remediate the material weakness, the Corporation has implemented the following initiatives: • Month-End Close Process: July 2025 marked the first successful month-end close, anticipated to be completed on August 22, 2025. This included key reconciliations, journal entries, and revenue-expense reporting. • Department Structure and Documentation: We are refining processes and documentation using technology and talent to promote transparency and accountability. • Leveraging Technology: o Ramp: Enables real-time spend controls, customizable virtual cards, and automated receipt matching. It enforces policy compliance, prevents unauthorized purchases, and supports audit readiness. o NetSuite ERP: Streamlines operations and decision-making through automated, real-time reporting, ensuring consistent and accurate insights across departments. We affirm our alignment with the auditor's recommendations to ensure trial balance accuracy, monthly account reconciliations, and timely year end closings. These practices are now embedded in our financial operations and supported by enhanced review protocols. The Corporation is confident that these corrective actions will fully address the material weakness and position the Corporation for sustained financial health, transparency, and compliance. Contact Person: Richonda Pelzer, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2026
Actions Taken / Planned The institution recognizes the importance of timely processing of Title IV credit balances and refunds. To address the deficiencies identified: 1. Short-Term Action (Current Practice): Effective immediately, all staff are required to submit for processing refunds within 24 ho...
Actions Taken / Planned The institution recognizes the importance of timely processing of Title IV credit balances and refunds. To address the deficiencies identified: 1. Short-Term Action (Current Practice): Effective immediately, all staff are required to submit for processing refunds within 24 hours of identifying a credit balance. Staff will also promptly correct any errors discovered during the reconciliation process. o Monitoring: Supervisors will conduct weekly reviews to ensure compliance with this 24-hour policy. o Training: Refresher training on Title IV credit balance processing has been provided to all relevant staff as of September 2025. o Instead of one ‘check run’ per week, numerous ‘check runs’ may be necessary to ensure 14 day window is met. 2. Long-Term Action (System Integration and Automation): The institution is actively working to integrate QuickBooks into our Student Information System (SIS) to automate Title IV and refund documentation. o This integration will streamline the reconciliation process, reduce manual errors, and ensure consistent, timely processing of refunds. o Projected Completion Date: Implementation and full automation are expected to be completed within 9–12 months, with a target date of September 2026. Expected Outcome: These measures will ensure timely and accurate processing of Title IV credit balances, improve compliance, and reduce the risk of future findings.
Contact Person(s): Calli Clevinger and Cobie Sparks-Howard Corrective Actions in Progress: 1. Policy Reinforcement: Staff will be re-trained on Wellspring’s rent reasonableness policy, with emphasis on the requirement to include comparable unit data on every form. 2. Integration with Move-In Assessm...
Contact Person(s): Calli Clevinger and Cobie Sparks-Howard Corrective Actions in Progress: 1. Policy Reinforcement: Staff will be re-trained on Wellspring’s rent reasonableness policy, with emphasis on the requirement to include comparable unit data on every form. 2. Integration with Move-In Assessment: The rent reasonableness form will now be a required document attached to the move-in assessment. A unit will not be approved for move-in until the rent reasonableness form is fully completed and attached. 3. Secondary Review: Supervisors will conduct a review of all move-in assessments, including the attached rent reasonableness form, prior to final approval. Anticipated Completion Date: Staff re-training: Completed by September 30, 2025 Integration of rent reasonableness into move-in assessment in Salesforce: October 2025 Secondary review and monitoring: Ongoing, beginning immediately Expected Outcome: These actions will ensure that all future rent reasonableness forms are completed, attached to the move-in assessment, and reviewed prior to approval of move-in. This will bring Wellspring into full compliance with both internal policy and audit requirements.
Management will implement a dual-review process for payroll submissions, requiring both supervisor approval of timecards and accounting verification against payroll system reports. Supervisors and payroll staff will undergo training on compliance requirements. Ongoing random spot checks will be perf...
Management will implement a dual-review process for payroll submissions, requiring both supervisor approval of timecards and accounting verification against payroll system reports. Supervisors and payroll staff will undergo training on compliance requirements. Ongoing random spot checks will be performed to ensure consistency and accuracy, and to confirm compliance.
Finding Reference Number: 2024-001 – Internal Control over Special Tests and Provisions Description of Finding: Documentation of the rent reasonableness determination could not be located for one program participant. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: There is no disagreement with this find...
Finding Reference Number: 2024-001 – Internal Control over Special Tests and Provisions Description of Finding: Documentation of the rent reasonableness determination could not be located for one program participant. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: There is no disagreement with this finding. Corrective Action: Going forward, management will incorporate rent reasonableness determination procedures into the purchase request form checklist for all payments for rent assistance. Projected Completion Date: December 31, 2025
View Audit 369520 Questioned Costs: $1
Action Taken: The Project is waiting for HUD’s approval on the waiver. If the waiver is denied the sponsor will return the distributed funds in excess of the amount allowed by the GPR grant terms and deposit them into a Residual Receipts account. If the waiver is approved the sponsor will be allowed...
Action Taken: The Project is waiting for HUD’s approval on the waiver. If the waiver is denied the sponsor will return the distributed funds in excess of the amount allowed by the GPR grant terms and deposit them into a Residual Receipts account. If the waiver is approved the sponsor will be allowed to retain the distributed funds.
View Audit 369518 Questioned Costs: $1
To whom it may concern: The Carmelite System, Inc. and Affiliates respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2024. The finding from the schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the number as...
To whom it may concern: The Carmelite System, Inc. and Affiliates respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2024. The finding from the schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the number assigned in the schedule. FINDING – FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDITS 2024-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Program Title: Federal Emergency Management Agency Disaster Grants Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Federal Award Number and Year: 4496DR 2024 Pass-Through Agency: State of Massachusetts Pass-Through Number: CTFEMA4496STPAT00971 Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.403(g), to be allowable under federal awards, costs must be adequately documented. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.303 requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: During testing of expenditures under the FEMA grant, the System was unable to provide documentation showing approval of an invoice dated May 2020. This invoice was selected as part of the single audit sample. The lack of approval documentation represents a deficiency in internal controls over compliance with federal requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The invoice in question was incurred in May 2020, prior to the implementation of the Acumatica AP approval workflow. In June 2020, the facility transitioned to Acumatica, which provides electronic tracking of invoice approvals. Cause: At the time of the expenditure, the facility did not have a centralized or electronic approval process in place. Approval documentation was maintained manually and was not retained or accessible during the audit. Effect: The absence of approval documentation for the invoice creates a risk that expenditures may not be properly reviewed or authorized, potentially leading to noncompliance with federal requirements. Although the cost was ultimately deemed allowable, the control deficiency could impact future compliance if not addressed. Recommendation: We recommend that the System ensure all expenditures under federal awards are supported by documented approvals. For legacy transactions, efforts should be made to retain or reconstruct approval documentation where feasible. Continued use and monitoring of the Acumatica system should be maintained to ensure compliance going forward. Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding. The invoice in question was incurred during an emergency response period prior to the implementation of the Acumatica system. While approval was likely obtained at the time, documentation was not retained. With the implementation of the Acumatica AP approval process in June 2020, the System has taken appropriate steps to address the finding and enhance internal controls over invoice approvals. Name of contact person responsible for corrective action: Corrinne Schindler
The Just One Project's CSFP team will maintain a filing system organized by service site, alphabetical client name, and month and year of registration. The team will also utilize the Salesforce system to track registered clients, recertification dates, and services provided each day. Effective immed...
The Just One Project's CSFP team will maintain a filing system organized by service site, alphabetical client name, and month and year of registration. The team will also utilize the Salesforce system to track registered clients, recertification dates, and services provided each day. Effective immediately, designated CSFP staff will visit all active distribution sites each business day to collect new registration and recertification forms, cross-check them and previously filed forms against the day's Salesforce distribution list, and file new forms in the designated system. This will ensure every client record is complete and current. In addition, the team will conduct an internal audit at least annually to confirm that all participant files contain required documents and certifications, promptly address any deficiencies, and document corrective steps. Staff will also receive periodic refresher training to reinforce record-keeping standards and sustain compliance.
Individual(s) Responsible: Enrique Martinez, Grant Manager and Program Director Action: Management will implement a process to ensure all expenditures are properly documented and reviewed for allowability before being charged to the Program. Staff will be trained on documentation and compliance requ...
Individual(s) Responsible: Enrique Martinez, Grant Manager and Program Director Action: Management will implement a process to ensure all expenditures are properly documented and reviewed for allowability before being charged to the Program. Staff will be trained on documentation and compliance requirements. Internal controls will be strengthened to prevent unallowable costs. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025
View Audit 369484 Questioned Costs: $1
Corrective Action: The finding was a result of prior staff that was replaced in the current fiscal year. Management has designated a resident intake and compliance manager to be responsible for monitoring tenant recertification schedule across all HOME-assisted unites. Any exceptions will be correct...
Corrective Action: The finding was a result of prior staff that was replaced in the current fiscal year. Management has designated a resident intake and compliance manager to be responsible for monitoring tenant recertification schedule across all HOME-assisted unites. Any exceptions will be corrected immediately and reported to management.
The exceptions resulted from delays in updating payroll/timekeeping systems and insufficient documentation to support allocation changes. To correct this, TRAC has implemented a Position Control Update process: any change to an employee’s grant allocation must be documented on a Position Control Upd...
The exceptions resulted from delays in updating payroll/timekeeping systems and insufficient documentation to support allocation changes. To correct this, TRAC has implemented a Position Control Update process: any change to an employee’s grant allocation must be documented on a Position Control Update form, signed by the Finance Director, and entered into the payroll system within 5 business days of the change. Additionally, the Finance team performs monthly reconciliations between timecards, payroll registers, and the general ledger to ensure that payroll charges are accurate and properly supported before being billed to grants. Completion Date: October 1, 2025. Responsible Parties: Nicole Binkley, Chief Executive Officer Josh Runnels, Director of Finance and Operations
At the time of the audit period, TRAC was newly independent from CitySquare and had not yet integrated supervisor approval of timecards into its internal control systems. This gap contributed to missing approvals during the transition year. As of September 2024, TRAC implemented employee and supervi...
At the time of the audit period, TRAC was newly independent from CitySquare and had not yet integrated supervisor approval of timecards into its internal control systems. This gap contributed to missing approvals during the transition year. As of September 2024, TRAC implemented employee and supervisor approvals of timecards within the time keeping system. Additionally, the organization has and will continue to implement a thorough review process that will include the following:  Employee acknowledgement of their individual grant allocation  Employee approval of their timecard  Manager acknowledgment of their individual grant allocation as well as the allocation of each employee they supervise  Manager approval of each employee’s timecard  The finance team will review each timecard individually prior to charging salary costs to grants. This process ensures that time and effort documentation is complete, approved, and compliant with federal and state requirements. Compliance with this policy will be monitored monthly by the Finance Director to ensure continued adherence.Completion Date: October 1, 2025.Responsible Parties: Nicole Binkley, Chief Executive Officer Josh Runnels, Director of Finance and Operations
In January and February of 2024, TRAC was transitioning from being a program of CitySquare to becoming an independent 501(c)(3). Following the transition, two staff members previously allocated to the match departed in September 2024, and their associated match was not reassigned. To address this, T...
In January and February of 2024, TRAC was transitioning from being a program of CitySquare to becoming an independent 501(c)(3). Following the transition, two staff members previously allocated to the match departed in September 2024, and their associated match was not reassigned. To address this, TRAC has implemented monthly accounting reports (effective August 1, 2025) to compare budgeted vs. actual match requirements. The Finance Director reviews these reports each month, and variances greater than 10% are reported to the CEO for corrective action. This process ensures that match requirements are budgeted, tracked, and reconciled in accordance with federal regulations. Completion Date: October 1, 2025.Responsible Parties: Nicole Binkley, Chief Executive Officer Josh Runnels, Director of Finance and Operations
View Audit 369477 Questioned Costs: $1
The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 200.510 (b) states that the audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier) to...
The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 200.510 (b) states that the audit, the data collection form, and the reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after the auditee receives the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period (whichever is earlier) to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). Corrective: Policies, procedures, and internal controls have been implemented to ensure that all required federal reporting is submitted timely to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC), in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 2, Section 200.510(b).
The purchase of the grant management system will interface directly with the organization’s accounting software, allowing for the automated extraction of financial data. This data will be systematically mapped to the corresponding budgetary lines of each grant to ensure accurate tracking and reporti...
The purchase of the grant management system will interface directly with the organization’s accounting software, allowing for the automated extraction of financial data. This data will be systematically mapped to the corresponding budgetary lines of each grant to ensure accurate tracking and reporting. On a monthly basis, the Financial Grant Coordinator will collaborate with Senior Directors and Program Directors to review financial activity. These reviews aim to verify that expenditure aligns with the allowable costs defined by each grant, ensuring full compliance with funding requirements. Corrective: Budget vs. actual reviews are conducted with senior directors to evaluate financial performance and ensure alignment with programmatic, administrative guidelines, and funding guidelines. During these reviews, directors assess which costs are permissible and identify any expenditure that falls outside allowable parameters. Non-compliant costs are reallocated to appropriate programs that permit such expenses or to administrative accounts as necessary.
View Audit 369464 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 172 173 175 176 953 »