Assistance listing numbers and program names 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies 84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction state Grants, Title II (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact person and title: Sarka J. Whi...
Assistance listing numbers and program names 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies 84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction state Grants, Title II (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact person and title: Sarka J. White, Deputy Associate Superintendent Anticipated completion date: December 2027 Agency’s Response: Concur Monitoring of CMO We will update protocols and implement an annual monitoring process specifically for charter schools with CMO relationships by integrating defined procedures to evaluate additional conflicts of interest, related party transactions, and segregation of duties concerns, while assigning a programmatic risk label in addition to the one assessed by Grants Management. To ensure accurate identification and appropriate separation of responsibilities, Title I and Title II will incorporate procedures for detecting CMO associations within both the grant review process and programmatic monitoring functions, supported by coordinated information sharing across relevant departments. Updated policies will also include requirements for disclosure of organizational associations and embed these indicators into the LEA level risk framework that determines monitoring frequency and representation based on assessed risk. Checks and balances will include programmatic follow-up on these disclosures prior to review of funding applications and or any assistance provided. Title I and Title II will revise monitoring tools to include CMO specific review steps, provide targeted staff training on identifying CMO relationships and apply enhanced oversight procedures, and carry out funding and program approval activities and monitoring activities. These can be in the form of financial and performance report reviews, Grant approvals, Data submissions, technical assistance, and onsite or virtual visits, in alignment with the strengthened risk-based model. Completion will be demonstrated through finalized procedures, documented staff training, and the application of revised monitoring methods during the next annual grant and monitoring cycle. Monitoring – Programmatic – Grant Monitoring We have revised LEA monitoring policies and procedures to incorporate coordinated processes between departments for clear identification of charter schools with CMO relationships, require now disclosure of organizational associations, and strengthen oversight of conflicts of interest, related party transactions, and segregation of duties risks. Updated procedures also define a structured, risk-based monitoring framework that assigns LEA monitoring levels, representation, and monitoring frequency based on assessed risk, independent of CMO affiliation, while integrating new indicators into monitoring tools to support consistency through equal representation and ensuring each LEA is treated as an individual LEA without respect to associations. Staff have and will continue to receive targeted training on the revised requirements, and completion will be demonstrated through the approval and publication of updated procedures, documented staff training, and application of the enhanced risk-based monitoring approach during the next LEA monitoring cycle.