Corrective Action Plans

The campus agrees with the finding. To address this issue and prevent recurrence, Los Angeles Southwest College will implement the following corrective actions: 1. Policy Implementation and Alignment: Fully implement District time and effort policies at the College level, with clear guidance on documentation requirements for employees funded by multiple federal awards. 2. Standardized Procedures: Utilize the establish standardized procedures and templates for time and effort reporting, including defined timelines for completion, supervisory review, and record retention. 3. Training and Communication: Provide mandatory training for grant-funded employees, supervisors, and administrators on federal time and effort requirements and District procedures. 4. Oversight and Monitoring: Designate responsible administrators to monitor compliance, conduct periodic internal reviews, and ensure records are properly maintained and readily available in multiple platforms. Los Angeles Southwest College is committed to strengthening its internal controls, ensuring full compliance with federal and District requirements, and maintaining accurate and reliable documentation to support all federally funded activities. Personnel Responsible for Implementation: Dr. Tangelia Alfred. Position of Responsible Personnel: Vice President of Student Services Expected Date of Implementation: January 5, 2026

Management concurs with the finding and recommendation. The condition resulted from a process gap in which payroll reallocations were made to comparable programs without a corresponding post-adjustment review against certified time and effort documentation. While initial certifications were obtained, a control step was not in place to ensure that subsequent allocation changes remained aligned with after-the-fact certifications. To address this, program management will implement a formal, standardized time and effort process that includes periodic after-the-fact certifications and a required reconciliation between certified effort and payroll distributions before charges are finalized to federal awards. Management will also establish clear internal controls to govern reallocations, require supervisory review of variances, and provide targeted training to staff on 2 CFR §200.430(i) requirements. Personnel Responsible for Implementation: Nyame-Tease Prempeh Position of Responsible Personne: Director of Accounting Expected Date of Implementation: February 1, 2026

Period of Performance Responses UNLV Health agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Prospectively, UNLV Health will ensure that expenditures are charged to the grant within the correct period. UNLV Health will be updating the template for payroll hours to ensure only time from the invoiced month is captured. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. The UNLV Health Finance Administrator and Accounting department will continue to review and approve the completed template along with supporting documentation, including ADP reports. Signed invoices will serve as the documentation that these were reviewed and approved. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV Health Accounting department is accountable for maintaining and approving documents. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Responses UNLV Health agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; UNLV Health is implementing a process to require employees to certify time spent working on a grant. They will sign a timesheet at the end of the month. UNLV Health will then true-up the payroll costs allocated to the grant with the actual time spent for employees charged to the program on a quarterly basis. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Program administrators will provide the UNLV Health Finance Administrator and Accounting department with the support documentation from the EMR system. UNLV Health Finance Administrators and accounting will continue to review all support documentation for compliance and performance. The grant expenditures details are maintained and tracked via spreadsheet. Additionally, the State also conducts independent audits and UNLV Health received a clean audit from the State for this specific grant in FY24. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV Health Accounting department is accountable for maintaining and approving documents. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Reporting Responses UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Management staff, independent of the preparer, will review and sign off on each report. This review process will include verifying that all information is correctly entered. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance and performance will be measured through the independent review process, where management will verify and sign off on each report to ensure accuracy. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Post Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Responses UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; All relevant staff will complete targeted training on payroll cost transfer requirements and proper process to ensure payroll adjustments are completed accurately. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Completion of staff training will be tracked and documented. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Post Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Period of Performance Responses UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Training will be provided to all relevant staff on cost allowability and period of performance requirements. This training will reinforce that costs must be incurred within approved project period. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Completion of staff training will be tracked and documented. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Post Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Responses CSN – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; CSN’s Office of Grants and Contracts Post-Award Management has advised the grant’s principal investigator (PI) to review expenses and avoid this issue in the future. CSN Office of Grants & Contracts Post-Award Management will continue to advise the departments that expenses associated with canceled events will be removed from the grant, unless the sponsor allows the costs to remain on the grant. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. CSN Office of Grants and Contracts Post-Award Management will maintain communication with PIs and employees to identify any costs associated with canceled events and ensure only necessary and reasonable costs are charged to the grant. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. CSN Office of Grants and Contracts Post-Award manager is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Reporting Responses CSN – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; CSN Office of Grants and Contracts Post-Award Management has advised the grant’s principal investigator (PI) that underlying documentations must match the data reported on the Annual Performance Reports submitted to the award sponsor. The CSN GEAR UP PI and GEAR UP First Year College Advisor have refined the reporting and record keeping process to ensure accurate reporting and supporting documentation is kept in compliance with the grant. The Senior Accountant of Grants and Contracts also reviews the data before each report is submitted to the sponsor. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. CSN GEAR UP PI and GEAR UP First Year College Advisor will continue to ensure accurate reporting and supporting documentation is kept in compliance. CSN Office of Grants and Contracts Post-Award Management will continue to communicate with PIs to ensure all reports have been reviewed for adequate and accurate supporting documentation prior to submission to the sponsor. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. CSN Program Director, who is the Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP) Principal Investigator (PI), is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. GBC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; o Establishment of a formal review and approval workflow requiring secondary review by the Grants Office of participants numbers prior to submission of any financial or performance report. This will require: (1) Identification of the reporting period; (2) Review of all source documents supporting reported totals; and, (3) Mathematical reconciliation of reported figures o Training provided to grant program staff and administrative personnel on documentation standards and reporting accuracy expectations. o All corrective actions were implemented immediately upon identification of the finding and will be fully in place within 30 days of notification. The revised procedures are now standard practice for all grants reporting participant numbers. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. o Reports may not be submitted to the pass-through entity without documented secondary review and written approval from the Grants Director or the Grant and Asset Coordinator. o Interim and final program reports will be reviewed to ensure: (1) Participant totals match underlying documentation; (2) Source documentation is retained and accessible; and, (3) Approval signatures are present prior to submission. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. o The Grants Director and the Director of Business Operations are responsible for oversight of grant compliance. NSU – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; NSU has reviewed the finding and has put additional measures in place to ensure compliance. Staff responsible for preparing reports were retrained and multi-layered quality checks have been implemented to safeguard integrity of data entered in shared databases. NSU’s multi-layered quality checks include written confirmations from staff involved in service activities and backup of documentation within NSU’s local storage to support the numbers being reported. The latter represents a move away from using a database that is accessible to multiple institutions to a centrally controlled location within NSU. This process outlined herein was implemented in August 2025 and ensures that the source documentation reconciles with reports and is available for auditing purposes. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. To ensure compliance, NSU staff who are responsible for the program and technical reporting have reviewed and updated internal policies and procedures relating to reporting. Performance targets and benchmarks have been reestablished and will be measured at set intervals. Any errors detected will be documented and remedied. Additionally, errors will serve as the basis for continuous improvement processes and retraining as needed. These will be documented in performance reviews. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The NSU GEAR UP Principal Investigator and First-Year College Advisor Supervisor are responsible and accountable for ensuring reporting is supported by underlying records. TMCC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; TMCC reports on the number of participants for all services rendered under the GEAR UP grant through both the Interim Progress Report (IPR) and the Final Progress Report (FPR). The identified issue concerns a discrepancy between the reported participant count on the IPR and the underlying supporting records. To ensure data accuracy going forward, TMCC will implement an additional review of participant reporting. Prior to the submission of progress reports, a second technical reviewer within the GEAR UP team would verify the participant counts entered into GEARS (GEAR UP’s designated data-reporting platform) against the supporting documentation (the attendance sheet). Should a discrepancy be identified, the GEAR UP team will follow up with the individual responsible for the data entry on GEARS to reconcile the difference. This may include requesting correction of data entry errors or obtaining additional documentation to support the reported participant count, as appropriate. Additionally, attendance sign-in sheets will be collected and retained by TMCC staff to allow for direct verification prior to reporting. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance and performance will be measured by the implementation of a second reviewer for the participant data reported through GEARS and included in the progress reporting. This review can be documented through an internal checklist, internal communication, or other appropriate records demonstrating that the participant data was reviewed and validated prior to the submission of progress reports. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Primary responsibility for accurate participant reporting will remain with the TMCC First Year College Advisor (FYCA) or other designated staff responsible for preparing grant performance reports. Responsibility for completing the secondary verification review will be assigned to a designated GEAR UP technical reviewer or program staff member who is independent of the initial data entry and report preparation. If repeat or similar observations occur, program leadership will evaluate adherence to established procedures and implement additional corrective actions, which may include staff retraining, revision of internal procedures, or reassignment of reporting responsibilities, as appropriate. UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; The UNLV OSP will continue to work with PIs to ensure there is a documented review of progress reports. PIs will be expected to demonstrate review of progress reports and provide supporting documentation for data. Additionally, if reports require financial expenditures, the Office of Sponsored Programs will require validation before submission. Communication dissemination will occur twice within the academic year. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. UNLV OSP will continue communications through Research Weekly (an internal communication newsletter) to remind PIs to ensure timely submission of progress reports and retention of records such as, lab notes, testing, populations served, activities performed, etc. to demonstrate activities supported by the grant. UNLV OSP will maintain communications with PIs to perform monitoring throughout the life of the award. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility along with the applicable Deans. UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; All participant counts reported in Interim Progress Reports will be supported by retained underlying source documentation that directly reconcile to the reported totals. Standard documentation expectations and retention requirements will be communicated to program staff. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance will be measured through pre-submission review of reported participant data against underlying records and through post-submission spot checks conducted by Program Director. Documentation supporting reported counts will be retained in the official project file and made available for future audit, management review, and internal monitoring. Evidence of reconciliation will be documented via checklists or certifications retained with the report. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Program Director WNC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Sponsors have determined grant practices and required reporting documentation, which have not been consistently required or expected of subrecipients. WNC will maintain its own sign-in sheets and documentation for all grant-sponsored activities to ensure compliance with overall grant requirements. The corrective action was implemented in July 2025. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. The GEAR Up coordinator will create and maintain sign-in sheets or other documentation for every grant-sponsored activity. The coordinator will maintain records in accordance with federal and state guidance and will ensure that supporting documentation is sufficient to support the reported figures. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Final responsibility and accountability fall on the GEAR Up coordinator and grant administrator. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Matching, Level of Effort, and Earmarking Responses CSN – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; CSN Office of Grants and Contracts Post-Award Management received approval from the award sponsor to perform a budget revision to remove office space usage from the cost share. The Office of Grants and Contracts Post-Award Management also advised the Office of Sponsored Projects to avoid using unallowable cost share expenses in award applications. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. CSN Office of Grants and Contracts Post-Award Management will continue to monitor award budgets to avoid using unallowable cost share expenses. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. CSN Office of Grants and Contracts Post-Award manager is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. GBC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; o GBC will standardize a cost share calculation workflow between the Grants and Business Operations departments to ensure proper calculation and review against payroll records. o GBC also will formalize written internal procedures for cost share calculation and documentation and distribute to relevant staff. o All corrective actions were implemented immediately upon identification of the finding and will be fully in place within 30 days of notification. The revised procedures are now standard practice for all grants requiring cost share. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. o A cost share verification checklist will accompany each cost share transaction and will be retained in each year’s grant file. This internal review will confirm: (1) use of current salary data; (2) mathematical accuracy; and, (3) proper documentation support. o Grant financial reports will include documented evidence of secondary review prior to submission. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. o The Grants Director and the Director of Business Operations are responsible for oversight of grant compliance. UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; The UNLV OSP has enforced a required cost share form to be completed, and will require that documentation be attached and verified before submission to the sponsor. For effort identified as cost share, a new process is currently being tested to capture it in the financial system. The cost share policy will be updated before the end of spring semester and disseminated to the campus community for immediate implementation. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Verifiable documentation will be required upon review/submission to be uploaded with the financial report in Workday. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility along with the Principal Investigator’s documentation. UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Management will implement quarterly review of all gift accounts used for cost share to ensure that they are properly established and correctly linked to the award through a GR cost share line, which will generate the required effort certification process. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance and performance will be measured through a review and confirmation that all cost share transactions are accurately recorded, supported, and associated with the appropriate worktags.  ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Post Award WNC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; WNC will continue its FY26 adopted internal control processes by implementing a two-step review process for all invoicing, including match verification and reporting. The assistant controller creates the invoice packet and submits it to the grant administrator for review and approval. The packet then has a secondary and final review and approval by the vice president of finance and administration. The sampled transaction occurred before internal controls were in place. Internal controls were implemented in October 2025. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. The grant administrator maintains records of monthly invoicing reviews, including time-stamped email receipts, internal tracking spreadsheets, and Workday transactions. Workday transactions provide actuals for each invoice period, which are compared to the internal tracking spreadsheet to determine the totals to be invoiced/reported. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Final responsibility and accountability fall on the grants administrator. SA – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; The spreadsheet that System Administration uses to track in-kind cost share was not correctly updated when the fringe rate changed at the beginning of the fiscal year. The Post-Award Manager will update the spreadsheet each July when the fringe rate is confirmed and run effort reports using the current salary and fringe rates. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. The Office of Sponsored Programs will document that the fringe rate for the new fiscal year has been reviewed, and that the in-kind cost share spreadsheet was updated each July. Documentation will be included in the cost share file. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The System Administration Office of Sponsored Programs Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Cash Management Responses WNC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Western Nevada College implemented the practice of invoice review (proper segregation of duties) in October 2024, in which all invoices are reviewed from an individual separate from the preparer. This practice has been in place since our October 2024 grant billing period and has continued ever since. This audit finding resulted from the auditor selecting a transaction prior to WNC implementing the new procedure. All other transactions selected by the auditor were in compliance. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. All grant invoices going forward will have a second level of review prior to drawing down or requesting reimbursement of funds. Documentation will be compiled for each grant invoice that will indicate that a second level of review has been obtained. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The Vice President of Finance & Administration may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Responses GBC accepts the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; o GBC maintains evidence of review and approval of the payroll expenses in question. GBC is very willing to enhance internal controls to provide for documented review and approval for terminated employees charged to the grant program. o GBC has strengthened internal controls over payroll expenditures charged to federal grants to ensure documented review and segregation of duties, particularly for terminated employees. o Documented evidence of review and approval will be retained within the payroll/grants file to ensure a clear audit trail. o Human Resources and Grants Accounting staff have been reminded of federal documentation requirements specific to grant-funded payroll expenditures. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. o Quarterly internal reviews of payroll expenditures charged to federal grants, with specific review of terminated employees. o Retention of documented approval evidence in electronic grant files. o Review during annual fiscal year-end grant reconciliations. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. o The Grants Director and Director of Business Operations are responsible for oversight of grant compliance. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Reporting Responses UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; The UNLV OSP will continue to work with PIs to ensure there is a documented review of progress reports. PIs will be expected to demonstrate review of progress reports and provide supporting documentation for data. Additionally, if reports require financial expenditures, OSP will require validation before submission. Communication dissemination will occur twice within the academic year. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. UNLV OSP will maintain communications with PIs to perform monitoring throughout the life of the award. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility along with the applicable Deans. UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Management staff, independent of preparer, will review and sign off on each report. This review process will include verifying that all information is correctly entered. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance and performance will be measured through the independent review process, where management will verify and sign off on each report to ensure accuracy. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Post Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Reporting Responses UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Management Staff, independent of preparer, will review each subaward report required. The review process will include verifying that all subaward information required by FFATA is correctly entered. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Compliance and performance will be measured through the independent review process, where management will verify the information in each report is accurate. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Pre Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Period of Performance Responses UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Training will be provided to all relevant staff on cost allowability and period of performance requirements. This training will reinforce that costs must be incurred within approved project period. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Completion of staff training will be tracked and documented. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Post Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Reporting Responses TMCC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Two additional layers of review have been added to ensure that every RFR/Invoice is reviewed. On 4/14/25 an extra invoice review was added to Workday ensuring that they have to go through a review by someone other than the creator. During this step, the attachments including RFR and the approval email by the controller is also reviewed for accuracy. The Grant Accountant also established a log in August of 2025 that includes the Due Date, Date sent to the Controller for Approval, the Approval date and the submission date. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Emails documenting the review of the RFRs are kept as proof of review and saved in our files as well as Workday. The tracking document will also be made available for future review. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The Grant Accountants will be responsible for ensuring that we are in compliance with the corrective actions UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; UNLV OSP does have separation of duties from the originator of the subaward to the review of the subaward agreement in entering all of the data points into Sam.gov for FFATA reporting; however, UNLV OSP will create a process document that explicitly notes this for future documentation. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Cross checking of the issued subaward (originator) is reviewed and entered into the federal portal by the submitter. As the federal portal requires one party to enter and submit, OSP management perceives this to be very low risk but will ensure reviews occur. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. WNC – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Western Nevada College implemented the practice of invoice review (proper segregation of duties) in October 2024, in which all invoices are reviewed from an individual separate from the preparer. This practice has been in place since our October 2024 grant billing period and has continued ever since. This audit finding resulted from the auditor selecting a transaction prior to WNC implementing the new procedure. All other transactions selected by the auditor were in compliance. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. All grant invoices going forward will have a second level of review prior to drawing down or requesting reimbursement of funds. Documentation will be compiled for each grant invoice that will indicate that a second level of review has been obtained. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The Vice President of Finance & Administration may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Matching, Level of Effort, and Earmarking Responses UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; The UNLV OSP has mandated a required cost share form to be completed and will require that the documentation be attached and verified before submission to the sponsor. For effort identified as cost share, a new process is currently being tested to capture it in the financial system. The cost share policy will be updated before the end of spring semester and disseminated to the campus community for immediate implementation. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Verifiable documentation will be required upon review/submission to be uploaded with the financial report in Workday. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility along with Principal Investigator’s documentation. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Cash Management Responses DRI – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Controls were implemented beginning on April 14, 2025, to require secondary approvals on all sponsored invoice transactions. NSHE’s accounting system was reconfigured to require a review step for all invoice business processes. An individual other than the preparer must now review and approve all transactions. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. Documentation for all sponsor invoice transactions occurs through the business process history in the accounting system. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The Chief Financial Officer may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. UNLV agrees with this finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; UNLV Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) has an internal control that requires a reconciliation form to be completed with each invoice submission. With any manual control, human error may occur, as in this case; however, the reconciliation form is used every time and is reviewed by the originator and approving authority. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management, and performance review. Reinforcement of cross-checking of the reconciliation form is enforced and will be used as documentation for review. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. The UNLV OSP Executive Director is accountable for exercising oversight and responsibility. Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Responses UNR – Agrees with the finding. ● Detailed corrective action taken, including what will be done to avoid the identified issues in the future, and when these measures will be in place; Supplier Invoice requests will be reviewed and approved by a manager independent of the preparer. The manager’s review will include verifying appropriate documentation is received and maintained to support payments processed. ● How compliance and performance will be measured and documented for future audit, management and performance review. The manager’s independent review and approval of each supplier invoice request, including verification of required documentation to support payments, will be tracked and attached within the system’s business process. ● Who will be responsible and may be held accountable in the future if repeat or similar observations are noted. Associate Director of Post Award Official Contact: Rhett R. Vertrees, Assistant Chief Financial Officer 2601 Enterprise Road, Reno NV 89512-1666 Phone: (775)784-3409, Fax: (775)784-1127 Email: rvertrees@nshe.nevada.edu

Indirect Cost Rate Review Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. The University does not have a formal review process related to indirect cost rate automated entries. As a result of this condition, there is an increased risk of unallowable charges to the grants, inaccurate financial reporting, and other potential noncompliance with federal regulations. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend the University implement procedures to review the indirect cost rate input and automated entries by responsible individual on a monthly or quarterly basis. Corrective Action. The University will establish formal procedures to review the indirect cost rate input and automated entries by additional individual on a monthly or quarterly basis. Responsible Person. Yah-Sheba Jenkins, Controller Anticipated Completion Date. June 30, 2026

Insufficient Supporting Documentation of Disbursements Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. During our testing of disbursements, we noted 1 of 26 disbursements tested where the University did not have adequate documentation to support why the disbursement was charged to the grant. As a result of this condition, there is an increased risk of unallowable expenses being charged to the grant, inaccurate financial reporting, and other potential noncompliance with federal regulations. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend the University establish formal procedures to ensure all expenses charged to grants have adequate support and reviewed and approved by management. Corrective Action. The University will establish formal procedures to ensure all expenses charged to grants have adequate support and reviewed and approved by management. Responsible Person. Yah-Sheba Jenkins, Controller Anticipated Completion Date. June 30, 2026

Non-Compliance with Servicer to Deliver Title IV Credit Balances Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. The University does not have a formal Banking Services Agreement with its financial institution. In addition, the University has not posted the agreement online, lacks documentation of the required biennial review, has not reported the arrangement to Federal Student Aid, and does not maintain adequate internal controls over the Tier Two Arrangement. Failure to comply with federal regulations increases the risk of regulatory sanctions, reputational harm, and potential financial penalties. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend the University execute a formal Banking Services Agreement with the financial institution, publish the agreement on its website, document and perform biennial reviews, report the arrangement to Federal Student Aid, and implement appropriate internal controls to ensure ongoing compliance. Corrective Action. The University will create a formal Banking Services Agreement with the Financial Institution, publish the agreement on its website, document and perform biennial reviews, report the arrangement to Federal Student Aid, and implement appropriate internal controls. Responsible Person. Yah-Sheba Jenkins, Controller Anticipated Completion Date. June 30, 2026

Lack of Review and Timely Filing of Financial Status Reports (Repeat finding) Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. During our review of the required reporting for the grant, we noted 1 of the 3 Financial Status Reports tested was submitted to the EGrAMS website outside of the submission period allowed by the grant agreement. As a result of this condition, the University is out of compliance with guidelines established by the grantor. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend that the University implement a process to track the submission of all Financial Status Reports to ensure they are submitted before the due date required by the grant to stay in compliance with grant agreements. Corrective Action. The University will establish and follow an internal controls policy that requires review and approval prior to submitting financial status report timely. Responsible Person. Yah-Sheba Jenkins, Controller Anticipated Completion Date. June 30, 2026

Lack of Review over Financial Status Reports Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. The University did not have documented review procedures in place for federal grant drawdowns nor review over monthly Financial Status Reports. Drawdowns were processed and Financial Status Reports were submitted without a formal review or approval process to verify that amounts reported and requested were based on allowable expenditures. This deficiency increases the risk of drawing and reporting federal funds in excess of actual expenditures or for unallowable costs, potentially resulting in noncompliance with federal regulations. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend that the University should implement formal review procedures for all federal grant drawdowns including monthly FSRs, including enhancing policies around reviewing drawdowns, designated reviewers, and system controls to ensure drawdowns are accurate, allowable, and properly supported. Corrective Action. The University will implement a review process to ensure that all drawdowns are reviewed by a second individual prior to submission. Responsible Person. Yah-Sheba Jenkins, Controller Anticipated Completion Date. June 30, 2026

Miscalculation of Student Cost of Attendance Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. Of the 40 students tested, we noted 1 student's Cost of Attendance (COA) was inaccurately updated after initial packaging due to the budget not being locked in the system. As a result of this condition, the University is out of compliance with federal guidelines. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend that the University implement a review process to ensure that all student budgets are locked and no changes made without proper review and approval. Corrective Action. The University will implement a review process to ensure that all student budgets are reviewed and locked. Responsible Person. Anne Van, Director of Financial Aid Anticipated Completion Date. June 30, 2026