Audit 362207

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$1.18M
Findings
2
Programs
5
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-07-15
Auditor: Wipfli LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
571282 2024-001 - Yes B
1147724 2024-001 - Yes B

Contacts

Name Title Type
C6AKWLSSMN69 Jim Patten Auditee
9208822831 Stephanie Cavadeas Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the State Single audit Guidelines, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass‐through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal, state, and local awards (the “Schedule”) includes the Organization’s federal, state, and local grant activity under programs of the federal and state governments and local sources for the year ended December 31, 2024. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and the Audit Requirements of Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”) and the State Single Audit Guidelines, issued by the Wisconsin Department of Administration. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the Organization’s operations, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, change in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the State Single audit Guidelines, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass‐through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The Organization does not have subrecipients; therefore, it does not have any subrecipient expenditures.

Finding Details

Finding No. 2024-001: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Repeat Finding – see prior year finding 2023-001 Major Programs: Special Education Grants for Infants and Families 84.181 Special Education Grants for Infants and Families Birth to 3 435.550 Social Services Block Grant 435.560100 Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor Grant Number Grant Period State of Wisconsin DHS 24-4104 01/01/2024 - 12/31/2024 Questioned Costs: None Condition: During our audit, we noted that Valley Packaging Industries, Inc. utilizes a direct cost allocation methodology to allocate shared costs to benefitting programs. However, Valley Packaging Industries, Inc. did not adequately document the activities for personnel that are directly charged through a cost allocation to support the charging of costs to programs as direct under the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). The allocation methodology would result in a similar allocation of costs if an indirect cost rate were to be used. Criteria and Context: The Uniform Guidance Section 200.412 allows for the classification of costs as direct or indirect costs. When costs are treated as direct, and allocated using a direct allocation methodology, Section 200.413(c)(2) requires that individuals involved can be specifically identified with the project or activity. Effect: Valley Packaging Industries, Inc. is out of compliance with the cost principles applicable to federal awards as it relates to the documentation of costs allocated under a direct allocation methodology. Recommendation: We recommend Valley Packaging Industries, Inc. review its internal process for documenting activities and allocating costs and evaluate whether a direct allocation methodology is still appropriate. Views of responsible officials: Valley Packaging Industries, Inc. utilized the same methodology in 2024 to allocate shared costs to benefitting programs as has been utilized in all previous audits of the Organization. Given the Organization’s vocational rehabilitation mission, it is critical that our accounting and payroll systems support a manufacturing environment to allow us to meet our customer’s needs and thereby subsidize the costs of executing our rehabilitation programs and mission. Our integrated manufacturing system currently does not support a detailed time collection system by employee. The Organization has deemed the investment needed to support this detailed time documentation would not be a judicial use of its resources at this time since our consistently applied allocation methodology does result in a reasonable and supportable allocation of shared costs. However, the Organization will continue to evaluate the resources available and system limitations and will make efforts to identify and implement a process to address this issue when appropriate. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Jim Patten, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Timing for Completion of Corrective Action: Ongoing
Finding No. 2024-001: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Repeat Finding – see prior year finding 2023-001 Major Programs: Special Education Grants for Infants and Families 84.181 Special Education Grants for Infants and Families Birth to 3 435.550 Social Services Block Grant 435.560100 Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor Grant Number Grant Period State of Wisconsin DHS 24-4104 01/01/2024 - 12/31/2024 Questioned Costs: None Condition: During our audit, we noted that Valley Packaging Industries, Inc. utilizes a direct cost allocation methodology to allocate shared costs to benefitting programs. However, Valley Packaging Industries, Inc. did not adequately document the activities for personnel that are directly charged through a cost allocation to support the charging of costs to programs as direct under the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). The allocation methodology would result in a similar allocation of costs if an indirect cost rate were to be used. Criteria and Context: The Uniform Guidance Section 200.412 allows for the classification of costs as direct or indirect costs. When costs are treated as direct, and allocated using a direct allocation methodology, Section 200.413(c)(2) requires that individuals involved can be specifically identified with the project or activity. Effect: Valley Packaging Industries, Inc. is out of compliance with the cost principles applicable to federal awards as it relates to the documentation of costs allocated under a direct allocation methodology. Recommendation: We recommend Valley Packaging Industries, Inc. review its internal process for documenting activities and allocating costs and evaluate whether a direct allocation methodology is still appropriate. Views of responsible officials: Valley Packaging Industries, Inc. utilized the same methodology in 2024 to allocate shared costs to benefitting programs as has been utilized in all previous audits of the Organization. Given the Organization’s vocational rehabilitation mission, it is critical that our accounting and payroll systems support a manufacturing environment to allow us to meet our customer’s needs and thereby subsidize the costs of executing our rehabilitation programs and mission. Our integrated manufacturing system currently does not support a detailed time collection system by employee. The Organization has deemed the investment needed to support this detailed time documentation would not be a judicial use of its resources at this time since our consistently applied allocation methodology does result in a reasonable and supportable allocation of shared costs. However, the Organization will continue to evaluate the resources available and system limitations and will make efforts to identify and implement a process to address this issue when appropriate. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Jim Patten, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Timing for Completion of Corrective Action: Ongoing