Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
51,702
In database
Filtered Results
48,899
Matching current filters
Showing Page
71 of 1956
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Based on the initial findings by the team at RBT while auditing Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) tenant income certification files, Schenectady Municipal Housing Authority (SMHA) immediately implemented the use of a check list to be used by SMHA occupancy specialists. The check list is to be placed in e...
Based on the initial findings by the team at RBT while auditing Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) tenant income certification files, Schenectady Municipal Housing Authority (SMHA) immediately implemented the use of a check list to be used by SMHA occupancy specialists. The check list is to be placed in each file and is made up of each compliance requirement for income certification with an area for the specialist initial once completed. This checklist services as documentation that all compliance requirements are met and verified for a tenant household. In addition to this immediate change with our HCV program and process, SMHA has implemented the use of this checklist with our Public Housing program and its tenant income certification documentation. Immediate supervisors will review completed files to verify use of these checklists, using them to teach and coach occupancy specialists in the income certification process.
While Pipeline Safety Trust followed an internal checklist to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred, it did not consistently document completion of this process. Planned Corrective Action: Pipeline Safety Trust will formalize its existing checklist process by implementing the following measu...
While Pipeline Safety Trust followed an internal checklist to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred, it did not consistently document completion of this process. Planned Corrective Action: Pipeline Safety Trust will formalize its existing checklist process by implementing the following measures: 1. Documented Checklist for Each Vendor: Require completion of the existing checklist for every vendor subject to suspension and debarment verification, including attaching a screenshot of the System for Award Management (SAM) confirmation. 2. Update Financial Procedures: Revise the financial procedures to explicitly require retention of the documented checklist and SAM verification screenshot as part of the procurement process for federally funded awards exceeding $25,000. 3. Staff Training: Provide training to staff involved in procurement to ensure understanding and compliance with the updated procedures. Name of Responsible Parties: Heather Radke, Business Manager Bill Caram, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: January 31, 2026
Federal Agency Name: Department of Agriculture Program Name: Community Facilities Loans and Grants Federal Financial Assistance Listing #10.766 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Finding Summary: The Center's reserve account is fully funded per the requirements of the loan resoluti...
Federal Agency Name: Department of Agriculture Program Name: Community Facilities Loans and Grants Federal Financial Assistance Listing #10.766 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Finding Summary: The Center's reserve account is fully funded per the requirements of the loan resolution security agreement. However, there is no documented secondary monitoring of the reserve balance as compared to the required minimum reserve balance. Responsible Individuals: Crystal Richter, Interim CFO Corrective Action Plan: Hired an Accountant July 2025. Management will ensure there are multiple people involved and overseeing the reserve balance and documentation will be retained review and approval over the reserve balance. Anticipated Completion Date: December 2025
Corrective Action Plan 2 CFR § 200.511(c) December 3, 2025 U.S. Department of Environmental Protection The Connecticut Department of Public Health respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025. Name and address of independent accounting firm: Seward and M...
Corrective Action Plan 2 CFR § 200.511(c) December 3, 2025 U.S. Department of Environmental Protection The Connecticut Department of Public Health respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025. Name and address of independent accounting firm: Seward and Monde, 296 State Street, North Haven, CT 06473 Audit Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 The finding from the June 30, 2025 schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the number assigned in the schedule. Federal Award Finding No. 2025-001 – Cash Management Auditors’ Recommendation: DPH should continue its efforts to timely review transactions initially recorded to base grant SIDs, reclassify those expenditures and initiate the drawdown request. DPH should ensure that federal drawdowns align with the immediate cash needs to administer the program. Planned Corrective Action: The Department has since initiated reconciliation of the accounts to ensure that all expenditures are aligned with their proper set-aside awards as well as beginning to drawdown from respective set-aside accounts. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026 Official responsible for implementation of corrective action plan: Chukwuma Amechi, Fiscal Administrative Manager 2 CT Department of Public Health (860) 509-7233
U.S. Department of Education Clinton School District #124 respectfully submits the following Corrective Action Plan for the year ended June 30, 2025. Contact information for the individual responsible for the corrective action: Daniel Brungardt, Superintendent Clinton School District #124 Independen...
U.S. Department of Education Clinton School District #124 respectfully submits the following Corrective Action Plan for the year ended June 30, 2025. Contact information for the individual responsible for the corrective action: Daniel Brungardt, Superintendent Clinton School District #124 Independent Public Accounting Firm: Gerding, Korte & Chitwood, P.C., 723 Main Street, Boonville, MO 65233 Audit Period: Year ended June 30, 2025 The findings from the June 30, 2025, Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. Significant Deficiency 2025-001 Child Nutrition Cluster Recommendation: We recommend that fund balances should be monitored to ensure that balances remain in line with child nutrition compliance requirements.
Action Taken: As part of corrective actions, the District has prioritized overdue infrastructure and equipment needs. Since July1, 2025 the District has invested $118,901.50 in equipment upgrades, including: rebuilding the 17 year-old walk-in cooler and freezer at Clinton High School; installing new...
Action Taken: As part of corrective actions, the District has prioritized overdue infrastructure and equipment needs. Since July1, 2025 the District has invested $118,901.50 in equipment upgrades, including: rebuilding the 17 year-old walk-in cooler and freezer at Clinton High School; installing new refrigerator and freezer units at CMS and Henry Schools; decentralizing cold storage operations to improve reliability and delivery efficiency, replacing a failing centralized system; replacing the serving line at Henry School, which is outdated and no longer meets the operating needs of a modern cafeteria; ongoing replacement of aged and non-functional food service equipment across multiple sites; review options for replacing or upgrading centralized walk-in freezer unit. These upgrades are critical to ensuring food safety, operational efficiency, and service quality for students. The District will also continue to track expenditures and ensure fund usage aligns with NSLP guidelines. Upon fully expending the excess fund balance, the District will submit detailed documentation by June 30, 2026 outlining how funds were used and the impact of those actions.
Completion Date: June 30, 2026
Completion Date: June 30, 2026
Sincerely, Daniel Brungardt, Superintendent Clinton School District #124
Sincerely, Daniel Brungardt, Superintendent Clinton School District #124
Management's Response/Planned Corrective Action: The Controller will ensure a process of dual review/approval on reporting is followed going forward to aid in identifying any reporting inconsistencies or misunderstanding of reporting instructions. This will be undertaken immediately.
Management's Response/Planned Corrective Action: The Controller will ensure a process of dual review/approval on reporting is followed going forward to aid in identifying any reporting inconsistencies or misunderstanding of reporting instructions. This will be undertaken immediately.
Management's Response/Planned Corrective Action: The Organization's Director overseeing these programs will provide training to staff on policies. The Organization has recently implemented internal chart audits to aid in verifying compliance with funder regulations and identifying any deficiency in ...
Management's Response/Planned Corrective Action: The Organization's Director overseeing these programs will provide training to staff on policies. The Organization has recently implemented internal chart audits to aid in verifying compliance with funder regulations and identifying any deficiency in supporting document retention and will continue this practice going forward.
2025-004 Inadequate Cash Management Procedures and Noncompliance with Period of Performance Requirements Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.305(b), non-Federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and the disbursement of those funds for program purposes...
2025-004 Inadequate Cash Management Procedures and Noncompliance with Period of Performance Requirements Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.305(b), non-Federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and the disbursement of those funds for program purposes under the period of performance. Furthermore, entities must have written procedures that clearly outline the timing and methods for drawing down federal funds in accordance with cash management requirements. These procedures should be documented, reviewed, approved, and periodically revised to ensure ongoing compliance. Client’s Response: The organization will revise its current draw-down procedures to reflect timing and methods for drawing down federal funds that are in compliance with cash management requirements. Proposed Implementation Date – 12/31/2025 Name of Contact Person – John Edwards, Sr. Email: jledwards@umadaop.org Phone: 419-255-4444
2025-003 Lack of Formal Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.332 (Requirements for Pass-Through Entities), a pass-through entity must monitor the activities of subrecipients as necessary to ensure that federal funds are used for authorized purposes and in compliance with applica...
2025-003 Lack of Formal Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.332 (Requirements for Pass-Through Entities), a pass-through entity must monitor the activities of subrecipients as necessary to ensure that federal funds are used for authorized purposes and in compliance with applicable statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Required monitoring includes, but is not limited to, the following: a. Reviewing financial and programmatic reports; b. Performing risk assessments of subrecipients; c. Following up on deficiencies identified through audits or reviews; and d. Ensuring subrecipients have required audits under 2 CFR §200.501. Lack of documented subrecipient monitoring constitutes noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Client Response: While the organization was in constant contact with subrecipients regarding the progress of their programming, those meetings were not transcribed. In the future, the organization will require mid year and year-end impact reports from each grant subrecipient. Proposed Implementation Date – 12/31/2025 Name of Contact Person – John Edwards, Sr. Email: jledwards@umadaop.org Phone: 419-255-4444
2025-002 SEFA Presentation Error – Prior Year Criteria: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §200.510(b)) requires that the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) accurately present all federal awards, including the correct identifying numbers assigned by pass-through entities for each award. Accurate...
2025-002 SEFA Presentation Error – Prior Year Criteria: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §200.510(b)) requires that the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) accurately present all federal awards, including the correct identifying numbers assigned by pass-through entities for each award. Accurate reporting is essential to ensure compliance with funding requirements and enable proper tracking and monitoring of federal awards. Client’s Response: Last year was the organization’s first time going through a Single Audit. Although the organization accurately tracked expenditures corresponding to the grant award, the transactions were charged to an unrestricted program. The correction was detected and corrected during this fiscal year. We have implemented the necessary internal controls to ensure that our grant reporting accurately reflects the expenditures for each of our respective grants. Proposed Implementation Date – 12/31/2025 Name of Contact Person – John Edwards, Sr. Email: jledwards@umadaop.org Phone: 419-255-4444
2025-001 Costs Incurred Beyond the Period of Performance Criteria: According to 2 CFR §§200.1, 200.308, 200.309, 200.344, and 200.403(h), a non-Federal entity may only charge allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of the Federal award’s period of performance, and any costs incurr...
2025-001 Costs Incurred Beyond the Period of Performance Criteria: According to 2 CFR §§200.1, 200.308, 200.309, 200.344, and 200.403(h), a non-Federal entity may only charge allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of the Federal award’s period of performance, and any costs incurred before the Federal award was made that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. All financial obligations incurred under the Federal award must be liquidated within the required time period. Costs incurred outside the approved period of performance are unallowable and constitute questioned costs. Client’s Response: During the grant cycle, the Organization submitted for an extension but did not receive confirmation of said extension. During the current fiscal year, the Organization has implemented additional controls to ensure that all grant funding is expended within the timeframe allotted. Proposed Implementation Date – 12/31/2025 Name of Contact Person – John Edwards, Sr. Email: jledwards@umadaop.org Phone: 419-255-4444
Contact Person – Superintendent, Dr. Erich Heise Corrective Action Plan – Will establish policy to ensure payrolls are submitted a week after the week of work is performed. Completion Date – Ongoing
Contact Person – Superintendent, Dr. Erich Heise Corrective Action Plan – Will establish policy to ensure payrolls are submitted a week after the week of work is performed. Completion Date – Ongoing
HHC was in the process of adding a new site in the Steelton area, due to additional need that had been identified for our services. HHC had been the recipient of a Federal Grant- American Rescue Act- Capital Grant and had identified several options for the use of such funds; however, none of those o...
HHC was in the process of adding a new site in the Steelton area, due to additional need that had been identified for our services. HHC had been the recipient of a Federal Grant- American Rescue Act- Capital Grant and had identified several options for the use of such funds; however, none of those options resulted in a viable use of these funds. It was determined late in the Steelton building project to utilize the American Rescue Act- Capital Grant funds to support this project. Due to the timing and the fact that the General Contractor had already been selected and work had already started on the project, HHC did not proceed with an Exclusion List check to ensure that none of the individuals on the project (contractors and sub-contractors) were not prohibited from being involved in this project. HHC’s Procurement Policy does require review of the Exclusions List for all projects supported by Federal Grant Funds. HHC has reviewed our Procurement Policy and determined that no revisions of the policy are required at this time. HHC has already completed a retroactive review of the Exclusions List of all Contractors and Sub-contractors that were involved in the Steelton Project and found that there were no identified exclusions. This review was completed in September 2025. HHC is committed to future compliance with the review of the Exclusions List for all capital projects whether or not they are supported by Federal Grant funds.
HHC has reviewed our process for reporting appropriate charges for each CPT code on bills to all third-party payors and found that in isolated cases, the EPIC system was reporting the Sliding Fee Discount Fee on the bill and not the charge from our Fee Schedule for selected CPT codes. HC will collab...
HHC has reviewed our process for reporting appropriate charges for each CPT code on bills to all third-party payors and found that in isolated cases, the EPIC system was reporting the Sliding Fee Discount Fee on the bill and not the charge from our Fee Schedule for selected CPT codes. HC will collaborate with our EPIC partner- UPMC- to identify why the bills are not appropriately reflecting the CPT code fees from our Fee Schedule instead of the Sliding Fee Discount Fee. HHC has implemented a quarterly internal review process for compliance with all Sliding Fee Discount program requirements. HHC has reviewed our Sliding Fee Discount Policy and determined that there are areas that require revision. There should not be any patients that are given a sliding fee discount based on their self-declaration of income and then continue to receive care without the provision of income verification. HHC is in the process of a total review of our Sliding Fee Discount Policy/Process/Application and will make appropriate adjustments to ensure compliance with the HRSA Sliding Fee Discount Requirements. HHC will replace our One-Time Sliding Fee process with a more compliant approach that will involve: Self-Declaration of Income, whereby the patient will provide us with the income and family size without the required supporting documentation and the appropriate sliding fee will be applied for that visit only, and all future visits will be considered a full fee patient until the patient provides the appropriate support for income and family size; All patients will be requested to provide their income and family size. HHC has implemented a quarterly internal review process for compliance with all Sliding Fee Discount program requirements. HHC has reviewed the claim in question and has no explanation as to why the income reported for a patient was different than the supporting income documents provided by the patient. HHC recognizes that this occurred in only one of forty patient samples. HHC will ensure that all employees that are involved with the Sliding Fee Discount program are re-trained on the importance of accurately reporting the patient’s income based on the supporting documentation provided by the patient. HHC has implemented a quarterly internal review process for compliance with all Sliding Fee Discount program requirements.
HHC recognizes their responsibility to ensure that all required Federal Reports, including FFRs, are filed on a timely basis. HHC recognizes that during the fiscal year ended 3/31/2025, we were deficient in meeting the timely filing requirement for FFR reports. HHC established a new process in Augus...
HHC recognizes their responsibility to ensure that all required Federal Reports, including FFRs, are filed on a timely basis. HHC recognizes that during the fiscal year ended 3/31/2025, we were deficient in meeting the timely filing requirement for FFR reports. HHC established a new process in August 2025, whereby the Controller will review the Payment Management System on a bi-weekly basis, but not less frequently than monthly, to identify the deadline for all required Federal Grant reports, including but not limited to FFR reports. The Controller will notify all appropriate individuals of any reports that require attention to meet the reporting deadlines and will be responsible for the timely completion of all such required reporting.
Finance department will set up the coding process and begin including Departments that match project codes for all federal programs. Corrective Action Owner: Lisa Peacock, Comptroller with assistance from the Senior Accountant, and report to Francesca Rattray, CEO
Finance department will set up the coding process and begin including Departments that match project codes for all federal programs. Corrective Action Owner: Lisa Peacock, Comptroller with assistance from the Senior Accountant, and report to Francesca Rattray, CEO
CONTACT PERSON: Dana Hudgins, Executive Director Upstate Workforce Board 864-596-2028 dana@upstatewb.org CORRECTIVE ACTION: The County will follow its internal control policies and procedures. Effective immediately, all agreements between the County and its consultant for the WIOA program will be up...
CONTACT PERSON: Dana Hudgins, Executive Director Upstate Workforce Board 864-596-2028 dana@upstatewb.org CORRECTIVE ACTION: The County will follow its internal control policies and procedures. Effective immediately, all agreements between the County and its consultant for the WIOA program will be updated and signed. PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE: June 30, 2026
The District will implement a secondary review process for the nutrition reimbursement reports and will monitor the monthly financials to ensure revenue is reasonable based on meal counts.
The District will implement a secondary review process for the nutrition reimbursement reports and will monitor the monthly financials to ensure revenue is reasonable based on meal counts.
Management will review the claims list for completeness and accuracy before presenting the list to the board for approval.
Management will review the claims list for completeness and accuracy before presenting the list to the board for approval.
The District will implement a secondary review process for the nutrition reimbursement reports and will monitor the monthly financials to ensure revenue is reasonable based on meal counts.
The District will implement a secondary review process for the nutrition reimbursement reports and will monitor the monthly financials to ensure revenue is reasonable based on meal counts.
Management will review the claims list for completeness and accuracy before presenting the list to the board for approval.
Management will review the claims list for completeness and accuracy before presenting the list to the board for approval.
Condition: The Intermediate School District (ISD) did not have internal controls in place to ensure that all the expenditures included in the quarterly claims for reimbursement were allowable. Planned Corrective Action: The ISD will review the process used by the local districts to report quarterly ...
Condition: The Intermediate School District (ISD) did not have internal controls in place to ensure that all the expenditures included in the quarterly claims for reimbursement were allowable. Planned Corrective Action: The ISD will review the process used by the local districts to report quarterly expenditures for the Administrative Outreach program. We will then create a process that ensures that the local districts provide supporting documentation that allows us to monitor the quarterly submission amounts for accuracy. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Chris Frank, Asst. Superintendent for Business Anticipated Completion Date: 1/31/2026
« 1 69 70 72 73 1956 »