Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
59,239
In database
Filtered Results
56,036
Matching current filters
Showing Page
1006 of 2242
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding No. 2023-003 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Each owner must comply with the requirements set forth in 24 CFR Part 92 regulations as outlined in the "Compliance in HOME Re...
Finding No. 2023-003 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Each owner must comply with the requirements set forth in 24 CFR Part 92 regulations as outlined in the "Compliance in HOME Rental Projects: A Guide for Property Owners" published by HUD which requires the property to maintain the contracted number of HOME units as well as the designated splits in bedroom size and High Home/Low Home unit ratios. Condition The owner did not make available to HOME tenants the contracted number and type of HOME units. Cause Management’s policies with respect to maintaining the number and split of contracted HOME units were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect The procedures for determining and maintaining the correct HOME units within the property were not applied. This could result in ineligible tenants occupying HOME designated units. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to our HOME units testing, one of the five properties tested did not meet the contracted HOME units size portfolio (there should be four 3-bedroom units (there are 5); and there should be three 4-bedroom units (there are 2)). Repeat Finding: Yes - Finding 2022-003 Recommendation Management should follow procedures in place to ensure consistent application and adherence to the requirements in accordance with the “Compliance in HOME Rental Projects: A Guide for Property Owners” published by HUD. Views of Responsible Officials A unit will be re-classified the next time there is a vacant unit of the corresponding size/type.
Finding No. 2023-002 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with the Compliance in State ...
Finding No. 2023-002 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with the Compliance in State of Oregon Housing and Community Services HOME Program Compliance Manual. Condition In connection with our lease file review we noted four instances of eight tenants tested where management did not provide support that they performed a 3rd party income verification in accordance with policy. Cause Management’s policies with respect to recertifications and eligibility and the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with Compliance in State of Oregon Housing and Community Services HOME Program Compliance Manual were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to our HOME units testing, four of the eight tenants tested did not have the a 3rd party income verification in accordance with policy. Repeat Finding: Yes - Finding 2022-002 Recommendation Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to ensure that recertifications and correct income verification procedures are performed timely, tenant eligibility is correctly determined and that tenant lease files are properly maintained in accordance with the requirements of Compliance in State of Oregon Housing and Community Services HOME Program Compliance Manual. Views of Responsible Officials For the properties in Washington, they have several sources of HOME funds based on the issuing jurisdiction State, County or City that adds a layer of complexity to the recertification process and due to staffing turnover, both at the properties and REACH main office some of the HOME 3rd party income verifications were missed at recertification. Management has established policies and procedures for complying with the HOME program which includes a centralized tracker for HOME certifications.
Finding No. 2023-001 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N-Special Tests and Provisions Criteria During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the nonfederal entity must maintain subsidized...
Finding No. 2023-001 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N-Special Tests and Provisions Criteria During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the nonfederal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than (a) every three years for projects containing one to four units, (b) every two years for projects containing five to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME/HOME-ARP-assisted tenant- based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition The owner did not ensure passing HQS inspections were performed during 2023. Cause Management did not have in place proper procedures and controls to ensure that HQS inspections were performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Effect or Potential Effect Housing units may be out of compliance with HUD Quality Standards. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to tenant file testing there were 8 instances of the 8 files tested where the passing HQS inspections were not performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Repeat Finding: Yes - Finding 2022-001 Recommendation Management should resume making sure all units meet the HUD Housing Quality Standards and ensure that the responses to any findings are cleared timely. Views of Responsible Officials REACH did return to doing HQS Inspections in 2023. With staffing shortages, it is possible that not every unit was inspected in 2023. REACH continued to reestablish our annual unit inspection process post COVID in 2024. For the finding related to Addy St. This property is managed by a 3rd party management company, REACH’s Asset Management team will work with the management company to ensure all inspections are happening.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of auditee: Friends of the Mission Finding: 2023-003 Name of audit firm: Propp Christensen Caniglia LLP Period covered by the audit: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 CAP prepared by: Scott Thurmond, Executive Director Telephone: (916) 416-0901 Comments: Managemen...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of auditee: Friends of the Mission Finding: 2023-003 Name of audit firm: Propp Christensen Caniglia LLP Period covered by the audit: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 CAP prepared by: Scott Thurmond, Executive Director Telephone: (916) 416-0901 Comments: Management agrees with the finding. Actions: Management has taken steps to ensure the SEFA is prepared accurately and timely.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of auditee: Friends of the Mission Finding: 2023-002 Name of audit firm: Propp Christensen Caniglia LLP Period covered by the audit: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 CAP prepared by: Scott Thurmond, Executive Director Telephone: (916) 416-0901 Comments: Managemen...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of auditee: Friends of the Mission Finding: 2023-002 Name of audit firm: Propp Christensen Caniglia LLP Period covered by the audit: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 CAP prepared by: Scott Thurmond, Executive Director Telephone: (916) 416-0901 Comments: Management agrees with the finding. Actions: Management will ensure that audited financial statements are submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the required time frame.
Finding 2023-003 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Other Matters Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Condition: During our test of cont...
Finding 2023-003 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Other Matters Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Condition: During our test of controls over compliance it was noted that payroll for a Tutor was charged to the Education Stabilization ESSER II major program grant, however the expense should have been charged to the ESSER III major program instead. Criteria: Costs charged to the Education Stabilization ESSER II major program should meet the requirements as set forth by Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200, subpart E (Cost Principles). Context: During our review of payroll transactions posted to the Education Stabilization ESSER II major program it was noted that a Tutor charged to the Education Stabilization ESSER II major program grant should have been charged to Education Stabilization ESSER III based on the supporting documentation provided. Effect: Town of Acushnet was not in compliance with the allowable costs/ cost principals requirement as set forth by the Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200, subpart E (Cost Principles). Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Cause: The Town of Acushnet (School Department) implemented “best” practice of spending down older grant (ESSER II) awards prior to spending down newer awards. Due to timing, the grant budget was not amended prior to spend down of this related expense. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Town of Acushnet follow procedures to ensure that payroll expenditures charged to the grants are allowable costs as set forth by Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200, subpart E (Cost Principles) Managements Response: We acknowledge the finding related to the payroll transaction for the Tutor charged to the Education Stabilization ESSER II major program grant. Upon review, we agree that based on the supporting documentation, the charges should have been posted to Education Stabilization ESSER III, rather than ESSER II. This was a result of a late adjustment made in order to utilize the remaining ESSER II funds before transitioning to the use of ESSER III funds. We understand the importance of correctly applying charges to the appropriate funding source and moving forward, we will ensure that our procedures are adjusted to avoid such misallocations and that all future charges are properly aligned with the designated funding source, in accordance with the established guidelines. Responsible for Corrective Plan: School Business Manager Estimated Completion Date: Fiscal Year 2024 Action Taken: The Schools have reviewed and updated our procedures to ensure that all future changes are properly aligned with the designated funding source in accordance with the established guidelines.
Finding 571294 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Finding 2023-002 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Program Criteria...
Finding 2023-002 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Program Criteria: Where employees work solely or partially on a single Federal program or cost objective, their salaries or wages must be supported by periodic certification that the employee worked on these programs for the period covered by the programs. The certifications should be prepared at least semi-annually, and or monthly and should be signed by the employee or supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Condition: During our test of controls over compliance with time and effort certifications the school department was not able to provide evidence that required certifications of time and effort for those employees whose time was spent either completely or partially spent on these programs were performed as required by Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: During our test of payroll transactions of the Education Stabilization Fund grants it was noted that the time and effort certifications did not meet the semiannual and or monthly certification requirements. Effect: The School Department was not in compliance with the time and effort certification requirements. Cause: The School Department completed time and effort certifications on an annual basis rather than semi-annual or monthly. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the School Department follow procedures to ensure that semi-annual certifications and/or monthly certifications are prepared and signed by either the employees and/or supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employees in a timely manner in order to comply with the time and effort certification requirement. Managements Response: We acknowledge and agree with the recommendation to ensure that semi-annual and/or monthly certifications are prepared and signed by employees and/or supervisory officials who have first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employees. We understand the importance of complying with the time and effort certification requirements. We would like to communicate that annual certifications were completed in FY 23, however, we will ensure that moving forward these certifications will be on a semi-annual and/or monthly basis. Responsible for Corrective Plan: School Business Manager Estimated Completion Date: Fiscal Year 2024 Action Taken: The Schools are now ensuring that their annual certification process be completed on a semi-annual and/or monthly basis, whichever is deemed necessary for the related position wages.
Finding 571292 (2023-001)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Finding 2023-001 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Criteria:...
Finding 2023-001 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. As governmental subrecipients of states are also required to use the same state procurement policies and procedures for federal funds as for non‐federal funds, the Town is required to follow Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter (MGL) 30(b). MGL 30(b) requires the solicitation of three written or oral quotes for procurements of supplies between $10,000 and $49,999 and sealed bids or proposals for procurements of supplies $50,000 and over. Management of the Town is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with federal requirements that have a direct and material effect on a federal program. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. Condition and Context: During fiscal year 2023, the Town did not comply with the required procurement policies and procedures process for procurements that exceeded both State and Federal thresholds. Questioned Costs: Unkown Cause: A Town State/Federal grants procedures manual that included proper procurement procedures did not exist until February 2023. Effect or Potential Effect: Due to the weaknesses in internal controls noted above, there is a risk that amounts charged to federal awards may not be in accordance with procurement, suspension, and debarment principles. No known questioned costs are reported, as it is not quantifiable. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes, finding number 2022-002 Recommendation: The Town should address the weaknesses in internal controls noted above in order to ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with federal and state requirements. Managements Response: We acknowledge the audit finding related to non-compliance with the required procurement policies and procedures for procurements exceeding the State and Federal thresholds during Fiscal Year 2023. The Town and Schools have Acushnet’s Federal Grant Procedures Manual (February 2023) to ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with Federal and State requirements – in particular, the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. We are pleased to report that we believe to have addressed this issue in Fiscal Year 2024 to ensure compliance with the procurement policies and procedures, as required by both State and Federal threshold. Responsible for Corrective Plan: School Business Manager Estimated Completion Date: Fiscal Year 2024 Action Taken: The Town and Schools have adopted Acushnet’s Federal Grant Procedures Manual (February 2023). This manual ensures that all procurements are conducted in accordance with the relevant Federal and State procurement standards, specifically the requirements outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. We are pleased to report that we have taken steps to address this issue and believe we have successfully ensured compliance with these procurement policies and procedures.
STDC concurs with the finding regarding incomplete intake documentation due to the absence of case worker signatures on multiple client intake forms under the Area Agency on Aging (AAA) programs. While client eligibility and demographic information were present, the lack of formal sign-off by the as...
STDC concurs with the finding regarding incomplete intake documentation due to the absence of case worker signatures on multiple client intake forms under the Area Agency on Aging (AAA) programs. While client eligibility and demographic information were present, the lack of formal sign-off by the assigned case worker represents a lapse in documentation compliance and internal control. STDC management acknowledges the importance of complete and accurate documentation to uphold program integrity and compliance with the Older Americans Act. We are fully committed to strengthening internal controls, reinforcing training, and implementing procedural safeguards to ensure that all eligibility determinations and service authorizations are properly reviewed and documented. To address this, STDC will reinforce existing policies requiring case worker authorization of client intakes, implement a formal quality assurance checkpoint before service initiation, and provide refresher training to all intake and case management staff. These steps will ensure compliance with documentation standards required under the Older Americans Act and STDC’s own internal procedures. Corrective Action Plan Finding Number: 2023-04 Planned Completion Date: July 31, 2025 Responsible Official: Aging and Disability Services Director Corrective Actions: 1. Reinforce Policy Compliance through Staff Training The Aging and Disability Services Director will conduct mandatory refresher training for all intake and case management staff. The training will emphasize the importance of complete documentation, specifically the requirement to sign and date all applicable forms, including: o Intake Forms 2270 and 2276 o Rights and Responsibilities Form 2275 o Client Information Release Form 2277 o Care Plan o Caregiver Assessment o Consumer Needs Evaluation (CNE) o Evaluation of the Home (Housing Assessment) Staff training shall be verified for completion using: training attendance logs, training agenda, and post-training quiz results. 2. Implement a Secondary Review Process (Quality Assurance Checkpoint) The Aging and Disability Services Director will establish a secondary quality assurance review by the Contract Manager or other designated staff prior to initiating services. The reviewer will confirm that all required forms are fully completed and include both client and case worker signatures. 3. Update Intake Documentation Checklist and Procedures-Attached The Aging and Disability Services Director will revise the internal Required Documentation Checklist to include a checkbox for verifying the presence of AAA staff signatures and dates on all applicable forms. The updated checklist will be implemented in all new client intake files. CASE FILE CHECKLIST 1. Referral and Screening The referral and screening process begins with the Information, Referral, and Assistance (I&R/A) staff, who receive the client’s initial inquiry or service request. Once initial details are collected, the referral is assigned to a designated AAA case manager for follow-up. Screening The case manager reviews the client’s records to verify information gathered during the referral. This step helps determine eligibility (typically for individuals aged 60 and over) and whether the client qualifies for AAA services or should be referred externally. The screening must include: o Medical history o Employment background o Home environment o Self-care ability o Socioeconomic and financial status o Services received in the past o General demographics and needs o Past and current health conditions o Physical, emotional, and cognitive functioning o Living arrangements and home safety o Health insurance coverage and benefits Referral and screening documentation must be included in the client’s file to support coordination, follow-up, and accountability. 2. Intake – Form 2270 (Applicable to Caregiver Support Coordination) This form is required and must be completed by AAA staff or the case manager to collect demographic information necessary to determine eligibility. The form must include: o Initial Intake Completion – Form 2270 o Client Rights and Responsibilities (read and checked off as explained) o Part I – Recipient Identification o Part II – Services Requested o Part III – Emergency Contact Information o Part IV – Relationship to Care Recipient o Part V – Care Recipient Identification AAA staff signature and date 3. Intake – Form 2276 (Applicable to Care Coordination Support) This form is required and must be completed by AAA staff or the case manager to collect demographic information necessary to determine eligibility. The form must include: o Initial Intake Completion – Form 2276 o Client Rights and Responsibilities (read and checked off as explained) o Part I – Recipient Identification o Part II – Services Requested o Part III – Emergency Contact Information o Part IV – If referred, enter referred by; if not, leave blank o AAA staff signature and date Forms must be fully and accurately completed and include the printed name or signature of the AAA staff completing the intake, along with the date. 4. Client Rights and Responsibilities – Form 2275 This form is provided and explained to the client. A copy must be given to the client. The form must include: o Explanation of client rights and responsibilities o Client signature and date Must be signed and dated by the participant/client. 5. Client Information Release – Form 2277 This form serves as authorization to release client information to support assessment, service arrangement, and coordination of care. The form must include: o Individual’s name and WellSky ID o Completion of Parts A, B, and C o Client signature and date in Part C A copy must be provided to the client. 6. Care Plan (15–25 minutes – form attached) The care plan is developed collaboratively with the client and/or caregiver and is based on preferences, identified needs, and available resources. It outlines specific services to be provided and desired outcomes. The Care Plan Form must include: o Complete client information o Type of service (e.g., Respite, Homemaker, Personal Assistance, or other services such as Residential Repair, Health Maintenance, or ERS) o Number of units or hours per day/week (if applicable) o Duration of services o Objectives and care-related goals o Self-care resources o Desired results and measurable outcomes The form must be signed and dated by the client and/or caregiver and AAA staff/Care Coordinator. 7. Caregiver Assessment – AIAAA CAQ E 3.0 (15–25 minutes – form attached) Only applicable for Caregiver Support Coordination case files. This assessment identifies caregiver needs, strengths, limitations, and stressors to support effective care planning. The form must include: o Complete caregiver information o Caregiver needs and profile o Skills and training assessment o Caregiver stress interview o Priority status o Optional targeting categories o Additional notes, if applicable Must include the printed name or signature of the AAA staff completing the assessment and the date of completion. 7. Consumer Needs Evaluation (CNE) (form attached) The CNE documents the client’s impairment level and helps determine eligibility for services. The evaluation must include: o Completion of Parts I–V o Classification of impairment level (low, moderate, or high), based on functional needs o Consideration of mobility, self-care, cognitive ability, and support systems The form must be signed and dated by the AAA staff member completing the evaluation. 8. Comprehensive Assessment & Statement of Need (form attached) This assessment provides a holistic view of the client’s condition and support needs. The form must include: o Complete client information o Documentation of physical, mental, and medical conditions o Identification of mobility limitations o Functional/physical status – check all that apply o List of current services or treatments being received o Family caregiver support o Medication listing, if applicable AAA staff must complete and check all relevant sections to ensure full and accurate documentation. 9. Evaluation of the Home (Housing Assessment – if applicable) Required for requests related to residential repairs or identifying health/safety concerns in the home. The form must include: o Residential status o Client name and address o List of items needing repair The form must be signed and dated by the homeowner/tenant (if applicable) and the AAA staff completing the evaluation.
STDC acknowledges the finding regarding the provision of CSBG-funded services to an individual without verifying household-level eligibility. While this was an isolated incident, it represents a deviation from both federal CSBG guidance (Office of Community Services CSBG Informational Memorandum 139...
STDC acknowledges the finding regarding the provision of CSBG-funded services to an individual without verifying household-level eligibility. While this was an isolated incident, it represents a deviation from both federal CSBG guidance (Office of Community Services CSBG Informational Memorandum 139 [OCS IM-149]) and STDC’s internal case management procedures, which require eligibility and service assessments at both the household and individual level. STDC has identified this as a training and documentation oversight. As a result, we are reinforcing compliance through mandatory case management refresher training, enhanced supervision, and internal file reviews to ensure consistent application of household-based eligibility protocols. Corrective Action Plan Finding Number: 2023-03 Planned Completion Date: September 30, 2025 Responsible Official: Community Action Program Manager Corrective Actions to Be Implemented: 1. Mandatory Refresher Training All Community Action Program (CAP) Case managers and intake staff will complete a refresher training on: OCS IM-149 “Strengthening Outcome Through Two-Generation Approaches”; Existing STDC Case Management standards and intake procedures; and proper documentation of household and individual case notes. Trainings will be held annually and during onboarding for new hires. 2. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Reinforcement Supervisors will reinforce the use of STDC’s CAP standardized intake, eligibility, and case management forms. Clear instructions will be recirculated to all case managers on verifying and recording household information. In instances where an eligible households is declining additional services, Case Managers will obtain signed affidavits from the individuals declining services or participation. 3. Case Management Packet Review and Update Case Management forms will be reviewed and updated, if needed, to ensure required fields for household size, income, and composition are clearly marked and completed prior to service approval. A standardized affidavit where individuals are declining services or participation in eligible households shall be created to document client refusal of services. 4. Internal Monitoring Protocol The CAP Program Manager will conduct quarterly reviews of a sample of client files to verify household-based eligibility and client file documentation standards. Any deviation will trigger corrective coaching and documentation of follow-up. 5. Documentation Audit Trail All CAP client records must include: o Completed household intake form; o Income verification and eligibility determination; o Corresponding service delivery/case management service authorizations, service delivery plans, and notes. Files lacking required documentation will be flagged and corrected. Continued deficiencies from Case Managers will be noted on annual performance evaluations with individualized employee improvement plans.
STDC acknowledges the auditor's finding regarding the inclusion of $12,153 in administrative costs in a supplemental reimbursement request submitted via Form B-13 to the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) under the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program – Part B. The costs in question lacked cont...
STDC acknowledges the auditor's finding regarding the inclusion of $12,153 in administrative costs in a supplemental reimbursement request submitted via Form B-13 to the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) under the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program – Part B. The costs in question lacked contemporaneous supporting documentation at the time of audit review. While STDC maintains that all costs submitted were incurred in good faith to support the Ryan White program, the lack of appropriate documentation constitutes a lapse in internal controls by the former Finance Director, Julia Gonzalez, over post-award claims processing. STDC has initiated an internal review and will consult with DSHS to determine the appropriate repayment action. Additional controls and protocols are being implemented to ensure that all future reimbursement requests—especially post-period—are fully documented, verified, and approved. Corrective Action Plan Finding Number: 2023-02 Planned Completion Date: July 31, 2025 Responsible Official: Director of Finance Corrective Actions to Be Implemented: 1. Policy and Procedure Development STDC shall develop a written policy governing post-award and supplemental reimbursement requests, with clear requirements for documentation and approval. The policy will define acceptable forms of documentation, including invoices, time records, internal allocation spreadsheets, and procurement records. 2. Document Verification Protocol Require pre-submission validation of all reimbursement entries by the Finance Director. 3. Supervisory Review and Sign-Off Supplemental claims must receive sign-off from both the Finance Director and the Executive Director prior to submission. Claims will include documentation verification and reconciliation to program records. 4. Training Ensure all finance department staff involved in grant accounting and reporting are trained on documentation requirements under 2 CFR Part 200, and internal review protocols for final and supplemental financial reports. 5. Communication with DSHS STDC will communicate with DSHS regarding the questioned costs and will take appropriate action based on agency guidance, including cost disallowance and repayment as required. 6. Quarterly Internal Reconciliation Establish recurring quarterly reviews of actual costs incurred versus amounts reimbursed to identify discrepancies and prevent accumulation of unsupported claims.   Policy Title: Post-Award Reimbursement and Documentation Policy Effective Date: July 10, 2025, or upon adoption by the STDC Board of Directors Applies to: Finance Department, Grants Compliance, Department Heads Purpose To ensure that all reimbursement requests, including post-award and supplemental claims, are adequately documented, supported, and reviewed in compliance with 2 CFR §200 Subpart E. Policy Overview STDC shall not submit for reimbursement any cost for which contemporaneous and auditable documentation is not available. All supplemental reimbursement submissions must undergo a formal review and approval process to ensure the allowability, allocability, and documentation of all requested costs. Procedures 1. Required Documentation: Every cost line item included in a supplemental reimbursement must be supported by original documentation including: o General ledger detail o Paid invoice or payroll record o Allocation spreadsheet (if applicable) o Program approval or correspondence 2. Review Process: The Department Heads, or their designee, will verify that all documents meet federal allowability and documentation standards prior to submission to the Finance Department. A Supplemental Reimbursement Review Checklist must be completed and signed before submission of any supplemental requests. 3. Approval Authority: Final approval must be obtained from the Finance Director and Executive Director. 4. Retention Requirements: All reimbursement submissions and supporting documentation must be retained according to the STDC Local Record Retention Schedule. 5. Reporting Discrepancies: Any discrepancy, missing documentation, or unsupported cost identified must be reported to the Finance Director immediately for resolution before claim submission.
View Audit 362192 Questioned Costs: $1
STDC acknowledges the audit finding regarding the inclusion of sales tax on a utility invoice that was initially charged to multiple federal programs through the administrative cost pool. While the vendor issued credit for the sales tax in question, the original charge had already been distributed a...
STDC acknowledges the audit finding regarding the inclusion of sales tax on a utility invoice that was initially charged to multiple federal programs through the administrative cost pool. While the vendor issued credit for the sales tax in question, the original charge had already been distributed across multiple grants, and appropriate reallocations were not documented at the time of audit review. Documentation of the credit was made in the subsequent month’s billing cycle and applied to the listed programs. STDC takes seriously its obligation to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance cost principles and recognizes the need to improve internal controls regarding invoice review and post-payment credit reconciliation. The Finance Department is taking immediate steps to make necessary reallocations to correct the grant charges and to implement control procedures that prevent future errors of this nature. Corrective Action Plan Finding Number: 2023-05 Planned Completion Date: July 31, 2025 Responsible Official: Director of Finance Corrective Actions to Be Implemented: 1. Immediate Reallocation of Sales Tax Credit The Finance Department will correct accounting entries to reallocate the $51.47 vendor credit back to the same federal grants charged. Journal entries will be completed and documented by July 31, 2025. 2. Invoice Review Protocol All vendor invoices will now be reviewed prior to payment for unallowable costs such as sales tax. Reviewers must initial a compliance checklist confirming allowability. 3. Credit Tracking and Reallocation Procedure Establish a formal mechanism for tracking vendor credits and documenting the reallocation of any prior charges to federal programs. Credits will be logged in STDC’s finance system (AccuFund) to the corresponding grants. 4. Staff Training Finance and grant staff will be trained on Uniform Guidance cost principles with specific attention to tax-exempt status and handling of credits. Training will be held annually and as part of onboarding. 5. Quarterly Reconciliation Review The Finance Department will implement quarterly reconciliation reviews to ensure that any sales tax mistakenly paid is credited back and accurately reallocated.   Policy Insert: Sales Tax Review and Vendor Credit Reallocation Procedure Purpose: To ensure that all costs charged to federal awards are allowable and that any vendor credits (e.g., for sales tax) are correctly applied and documented in accordance with 2 CFR §200.403 and §200.405. Procedure: 1. Invoice Review Prior to Payment Accounting Technicians must review all invoices for unallowable items, including sales tax. Any invoice that includes sales tax must be returned to the program department for correction or payment adjusted accordingly by their vendors. 2. Vendor Credit and Grant Reallocation Upon receipt of a credit from a vendor, the credit must be reviewed for its original allocation(s) to federal grants. The credit amount must be allocated proportionally back to each grant that was charged. A reallocation journal entry must be documented and approved by the Finance Director. 3. Documentation and Recordkeeping Copies of invoices, credits, allocation entries, and internal review checklists must be retained with supporting documentation as required by STDC’s Local Record Retention Schedule. 4. Oversight The Finance Director will review the implementation of this policy on a quarterly for completeness and compliance.
Subject: Timeliness in Reporting: Criteria or Specific Requirement: Touchstone Behavioral Health d/b/a Touchstone Health Services must submit their financial and federal award information to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after Touchstone Behavioral Health d/b/a Touchstone Health S...
Subject: Timeliness in Reporting: Criteria or Specific Requirement: Touchstone Behavioral Health d/b/a Touchstone Health Services must submit their financial and federal award information to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within 30 days after Touchstone Behavioral Health d/b/a Touchstone Health Services receives the audit report or within 9 months from Touchstone Behavioral Health d/b/a Touchstone Health Services’ fiscal year end. Condition: The fiscal 2023 financial statements, single audit reporting package and data collection form were not completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse until after June 30, 2024. Name of Contact Person: Janae Ben-Shabat, CFO Phone Number: 480-516-3116 Anticipated Completion Date: July 31, 2024 View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: Touchstone Behavioral Health d/b/a Touchstone Health Services will establish additional policies and procedures and identify and dedicate specific personnel resources to ensure that system changes or other significant operational changes can occur without a significant disruption to reporting requirements.
CONTACT PERSON: Mandy Hess, Finance Director, mhess@pickenscity.com CORRECTIVE ACTION: The City has implemented procedures for grant compliance requirements to ensure that grant reporting is submitted on a timelier basis. PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE: July 31, 2025
CONTACT PERSON: Mandy Hess, Finance Director, mhess@pickenscity.com CORRECTIVE ACTION: The City has implemented procedures for grant compliance requirements to ensure that grant reporting is submitted on a timelier basis. PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE: July 31, 2025
Re: Independent Audit FYE September 30, 2023—Management Response Dear Mr. Zenk: This letter serves as the Muskegon Housing Commission’s follow-up and completed response to the finding reported in the Independent Audit FYE September 30, 2023.Finding 2023-001 Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program T...
Re: Independent Audit FYE September 30, 2023—Management Response Dear Mr. Zenk: This letter serves as the Muskegon Housing Commission’s follow-up and completed response to the finding reported in the Independent Audit FYE September 30, 2023.Finding 2023-001 Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Tenant Files were missing supporting documents and not timely recertified. Corrective Action: MHC has worked to make corrections to all files and get them in correct order. All recertifications are started 120 days prior to the date. Beginning July 1, 2024 all files will have a checklist completed and the Executive Director will sign and verify all documents are included. We will utilize the checklists attached and make any updates as needed per regulations.
Finding Number: 2023‐002 Federal Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 20.507, 20.526 State Program Names: State Urbanized Area Formula Program; State Formula Grants for Rural Areas Contact Person: Ted Ross, Executive Director Updated Corrective Action Plan: The District ...
Finding Number: 2023‐002 Federal Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 20.507, 20.526 State Program Names: State Urbanized Area Formula Program; State Formula Grants for Rural Areas Contact Person: Ted Ross, Executive Director Updated Corrective Action Plan: The District has revised its procurement procedures to meet Uniform Guidance requirements. Enhancements include: • Mandatory documentation of quotes for applicable procurements • Verification and documentation of suspension and debarment checks for all covered transactions • Centralization of procurement records in accordance with best practices Policy training and practices are already in place and are being followed. Certification: The Gulf Coast Transit District affirms that all corrective actions noted above are actively corrected or are being addressed. Additional documentation or clarification will be provided to auditors upon request.
Finding Number: 2023‐001 Federal Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 20.507, 20.526 State Program Names: State Urbanized Area Formula Program; State Formula Grants for Rural Areas Contact Person: Ted Ross, Executive Director Updated Corrective Action Plan: The District ...
Finding Number: 2023‐001 Federal Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 20.507, 20.526 State Program Names: State Urbanized Area Formula Program; State Formula Grants for Rural Areas Contact Person: Ted Ross, Executive Director Updated Corrective Action Plan: The District continues to strengthen its grant management framework through policy development and improved procedures. Actions to include: • Improved documentation of grant expense allocation • Updated purchasing procedures consistent with federal and state compliance expectations • Enhanced tracking of expenditures to specific programs and funding streams These measures have been incorporated into the district’s comprehensive Finance and Administration Policy, with staff training to be ongoing. Certification: The Gulf Coast Transit District affirms that all corrective actions noted above are actively corrected or are being addressed. Additional documentation or clarification will be provided to auditors upon request.
Management agrees with the finding and has updated its internal lost revenue calculation, with cumulative amounts through Period 6 reporting. While management did attempt to update its lost revenue amounts with filing of its Period 4 reports, additional data entry errors were made. Four out of the s...
Management agrees with the finding and has updated its internal lost revenue calculation, with cumulative amounts through Period 6 reporting. While management did attempt to update its lost revenue amounts with filing of its Period 4 reports, additional data entry errors were made. Four out of the six entities that need to report on PRF funding have no further reporting periods; therefore, the Organization has no ability to make further corrections. As such, the internal records maintained by the Organization must serve as teh final reporting of the PRF funding.
Condition: The Organization could not provide one salary authorization from for sample selection of 40 employees. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has implemented a process to ensure that all salary authorizations are properly obtained and stored. When there is any change in an employee...
Condition: The Organization could not provide one salary authorization from for sample selection of 40 employees. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has implemented a process to ensure that all salary authorizations are properly obtained and stored. When there is any change in an employee's status or salary, an Employee Status Form is completed and signed by the employee, their supervisor, and Human Resources, and when required by the COO and CEO. Additionally, the salary authorization form is added to a secure shared file drive. The shared file drive includes a section where all salary changes are listed. Both HR and Finance initial off to confirm that each salary change is supported by the proper documentation during the payroll review process. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Joe Derry, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented.
Condition: No documentation of employee time approval by supervisors could be provided. The payroll clerk processes the payroll and finance director approves through the releasing of the payroll. However, there is no formal documentation of the overall review of the payroll process and the supervi...
Condition: No documentation of employee time approval by supervisors could be provided. The payroll clerk processes the payroll and finance director approves through the releasing of the payroll. However, there is no formal documentation of the overall review of the payroll process and the supervisors' approval to time recorded by employees. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has implemented a new payroll process using the ADP system. Employees are now required to approve their own time within the ADP portal, and this approval is documented. Following this, supervisors review and approve their employee's time, which is also documented in the portal. Human Resources then prepares the payroll, reviewing all entries and initialing a shared file of payroll items and providing backup for changes. Once HR confirms accuracy, they notify Finance. Finance then reviews the payroll, with the Finance Manager providing the final approval within ADP once all items are confirmed. The entire process is fully documented, with approvals recorded within the ADP by employees and supervisors and the shared file drive where HR and Finance intimal off on the reviewed payroll times, ensuring a traceable record of the entire payroll approval process. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Joe Derry, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented.
Condition: The Organization did not maintain property documentation to support the review of the report prior to submission to the grantor, other than the review done by the preparer. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has hire a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting ...
Condition: The Organization did not maintain property documentation to support the review of the report prior to submission to the grantor, other than the review done by the preparer. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has hire a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. The accounting staff was restructured in November 2024 with the addition of a Finance Manager and Senior Accountant to strengthen internal controls and facilitate segregation of duties and best practices for day-to-day activities. In addition to review of month-end journal entries, reporting requirements with additional review as also implemented in 2025. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Joe Derry, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented.
Condition: The Organization did not maintain proper documentation in support of reporting requirements. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has hire a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. The accounting staff was restructured in ...
Condition: The Organization did not maintain proper documentation in support of reporting requirements. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has hire a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. The accounting staff was restructured in November 2024 with the addition of a Finance Manager and Senior Accountant to strengthen internal control and facilitate segregation of duties best practices for day-to-day activities. In addition to review of month-end journal entries, reporting requirements with additional review was also implemented in 2025. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Joe Derry, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented.
Condition: The Organization lacks consistently applied processes and procedures related to the application of the sliding fee scale. The Organization also lacks a clear review process related to the sliding fee scale to identify errors quickly to allow for corrections to be made in a timely manner....
Condition: The Organization lacks consistently applied processes and procedures related to the application of the sliding fee scale. The Organization also lacks a clear review process related to the sliding fee scale to identify errors quickly to allow for corrections to be made in a timely manner. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has hired a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. The Billing and Collections Policy was updated to waive co-pays for students in the School-Based Program. The Billing Department is in the process of auditing and implementing quarterly feedback & training sessions for the Operations Department for training and compliance for the Sliding Fee Discount Program. This process was implemented in 2025. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Joe Derry, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented.
Finding Number: 2023-003 Planned Corrective Action: City Auditor will stay in contact with Municipal Court Administrator and the Police Captain to ensure they submit Quarterly Reports on a timely basis. Anticipated Completion Date: July 3, 2025 Responsible Contact Person: City Auditor Sherri Hess
Finding Number: 2023-003 Planned Corrective Action: City Auditor will stay in contact with Municipal Court Administrator and the Police Captain to ensure they submit Quarterly Reports on a timely basis. Anticipated Completion Date: July 3, 2025 Responsible Contact Person: City Auditor Sherri Hess
Finding Number: 2023-002 Planned Corrective Action: City Auditor has confirmed the ARPA 3/31/24 and 3/31/25 Project and Expenditure Reports submitted agree to City Accounting records. Anticipated Completion Date: July 3, 2025 Responsible Contact Person: City Auditor Sherri Hess
Finding Number: 2023-002 Planned Corrective Action: City Auditor has confirmed the ARPA 3/31/24 and 3/31/25 Project and Expenditure Reports submitted agree to City Accounting records. Anticipated Completion Date: July 3, 2025 Responsible Contact Person: City Auditor Sherri Hess
« 1 1004 1005 1007 1008 2242 »