Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
59,239
In database
Filtered Results
56,036
Matching current filters
Showing Page
1005 of 2242
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding 2023-002: Federal Expenditures Reported Under Incorrect Assistance Listing Number (ALN) - Recommendation: We recommend the Organization establish a formal review process for SEFA preparation to ensure expenditures are accurately reported under the correct ALNs. Management’s Response: We agre...
Finding 2023-002: Federal Expenditures Reported Under Incorrect Assistance Listing Number (ALN) - Recommendation: We recommend the Organization establish a formal review process for SEFA preparation to ensure expenditures are accurately reported under the correct ALNs. Management’s Response: We agree with the recommendation. Management will establish a formal review process for the preparation of the SEFA to ensure federal expenditures are accurately reported under the correct Assistance Listing Numbers (ALNs). This process will include a detailed review of grant agreements, coordination with program staff, and reconciliation to the general ledger to help ensure accuracy and compliance with federal reporting requirements.
Finding 2023-001: Year-End Close and Review - Recommendation: We recommend the Organization perform a thorough year-end close and review by reviewing current balances compared to the prior year, reviewing bank reconciliations for any large outstanding items, and reviewing details of account balances...
Finding 2023-001: Year-End Close and Review - Recommendation: We recommend the Organization perform a thorough year-end close and review by reviewing current balances compared to the prior year, reviewing bank reconciliations for any large outstanding items, and reviewing details of account balances, as necessary, prior to providing the trial balance for audit. Management’s Response: We agree with the recommendation and recognize the importance of a thorough year-end close and review process. Management will implement procedures to compare current year account balances to the prior year, ensure all bank reconciliations are completed and reviewed for significant outstanding items, and analyze account details as needed. These steps will be incorporated into our year-end closing checklist to help ensure the accuracy and completeness of the trial balance prior to submission for audit.
Management recruited a new Chief Financial Officer who started in January 2024. Management is fully committed to making any necessary changes to its financial reporting policies and procedures to comply with independent auditing of financial statements being completed in accordance with Federal and ...
Management recruited a new Chief Financial Officer who started in January 2024. Management is fully committed to making any necessary changes to its financial reporting policies and procedures to comply with independent auditing of financial statements being completed in accordance with Federal and State Regulations, as well as with commonly accepted industry standards.
Finding 571681 (2023-003)
Significant Deficiency 2023
FINDING 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A – Direct Grant Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Procurement – Suspension and D...
FINDING 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A – Direct Grant Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Procurement – Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Condition: The City of Bloomington could not provide documentation to support that vendors procured under CSLFRF funding were not suspended or debarred. Context: In a sample of five vendors with aggregate disbursements for FY2023 above the $25,000 covered transaction threshold, Crowe noted for each selection that the City had not completed a check for suspension and debarment nor had had they obtained a contract clause from the vendor/service provider certifying that they were not suspended and/or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has formulated a procurement policy specific to federal awards to ensure all necessary requirements are met moving forward, which includes checking whether a vendor is suspended and/or debarred prior to entering into a contract with said vendor. Responsible party and timeline for completion: The City’s Controller will oversee the implementation of the corrective action plan, which will be implemented starting during calendar year 2025.
Finding 571680 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
FINDING 2023-002 Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A – Direct Grant Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Sign...
FINDING 2023-002 Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A – Direct Grant Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Condition: City of Bloomington completed quarterly reporting in a timely manner substantiated by the City’s expenditure detail. However, management could not differentiate between subrecipients and standard vendor purchases. Context: During our testing procedures over CSLFRF reporting, we noted that segregation of duties is not present in the Federal reporting process. The Deputy Controller prepared and submitted the reports without a secondary review taking place. As a result, the City did not report expenditures for the grant that were consistent with the expenditures reported on the SEFA and could not properly identify subrecipient expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will develop an internal controls process to ensure that there’s segregation of duties within the reporting process for federal programs. Responsible party and timeline for completion: The City’s Controller will oversee the implementation of the corrective action plan, which will be implemented starting during calendar year 2025.
Finding 2023-001 Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A – Direct Grant Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Audit ...
Finding 2023-001 Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A – Direct Grant Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Condition: The City of Bloomington was unable to identify subrecipients of CSLFRF funding for the purposes of financial reporting and compliance with requirements under 2 CFR 200.332. The City could not distinguish between a subrecipient and a general vendor. Management misreported subrecipient activity on the SEFA, failed to include required contractual language for subrecipient awards in executed agreements, and did not perform monitoring procedures over the subrecipients management identified during audit testing procedures. Context: The 10 subrecipients represent approximately 18%, $1,025,070, of the total award expenditures of $5,590,828, in 2023. The condition reported was prevalent for each subrecipient participating in the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will draft a policy and develop an internal controls process regarding subawards and the monitoring of subrecipients to ensure the compliance requirements are met. Responsible party and timeline for completion: The City’s Controller will be responsible for overseeing the implementation of the corrective action plan, which will be implemented starting during calendar year 2025.
Condition: Single Audit Report should have been submitted the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report or 9 months after the end of the Organization’s year end. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that expend $750,000 and greater of federal funds to conduct a Single Au...
Condition: Single Audit Report should have been submitted the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report or 9 months after the end of the Organization’s year end. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that expend $750,000 and greater of federal funds to conduct a Single Audit and submit the data collection form to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse no later than nine months after year end. Cause: The Organization expended federal funds over $750,000 requiring a Single Audit to be performed. Because of the misunderstanding in the filing requirement and due to shortage of staff, the Organization failed to meet the Uniform Guidance requirement of submitting the Single Audit report nine months after year end. Effect: The Organization's Single Audit report was not submitted timely resulting in noncompliance with requirements under the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200). Furthermore, missing the deadline can lead to an organization being considered "high risk" in the following year and subject to additional testing, potentially incurring extra audit expenses. Recommendation: The Organization should implement policies and procedures that would guide personnel to prepare timely for the Single Audit, conduct the audit earlier in the year, and submit the report no later than nine months after year end. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Given that the Organization’s accounting team is relatively small, consisting of only three staff members, the Organization has determined that initiating the audit in July-no later than August- will be the most feasible approach moving forward. This timing aligns with the fiscal year calendars of the majority of their funding partners, which will provide the Organization with an extended period to dedicate their full attention to the audit process as the new fiscal year begins. Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Plan: Denise Villamil, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025
The District will work with the Auditors to get the District caught up and ensure audits are submitted on time. There were no prior year findings in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs in our audit for the year ended June 30, 2021.
The District will work with the Auditors to get the District caught up and ensure audits are submitted on time. There were no prior year findings in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs in our audit for the year ended June 30, 2021.
Finding 571621 (2023-003)
Significant Deficiency 2023
The County will adopt a procurement policy in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. This will be done with an ordinance passed by the county board.
The County will adopt a procurement policy in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. This will be done with an ordinance passed by the county board.
Finding 2023-005 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF will enhance its internal processes and staffing to ensure the timely submission of future Single Audit Reporting Packages...
Finding 2023-005 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF will enhance its internal processes and staffing to ensure the timely submission of future Single Audit Reporting Packages. In January 2025, CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager dedicated to overseeing federal grant management, including the coordination and timely submission of all required audit and reporting packages. Key actions include:  Establishing and maintaining a robust timeline for audit activities, closely collaborating with both the accounting team and external auditors to guarantee adherence to submission deadlines.  Implementing a cross-training program within the accounting and compliance departments to mitigate the risk of disruption due to staff turnover, ensuring multiple staff members are proficient in handling audit-related tasks.  Scheduling regular internal audits and compliance checks to proactively identify and address potential issues well in advance of filing deadlines. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025.
Finding 2023-004 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF will conduct a thorough review and update of its reporting policies and procedures to ensure alignment with the requiremen...
Finding 2023-004 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF will conduct a thorough review and update of its reporting policies and procedures to ensure alignment with the requirements of Federal Awards. In January 2025, CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager responsible for overseeing the preparation, review, and submission of all grant-related reports. Key actions include:  Ensuring compliance with GAAP and federal regulations for timely and accurate submission of quarterly financial and progress reports.  Coordinating with relevant departments, managing grant accounting processing system submissions, and acting as the primary point of contact for grantor agencies regarding reporting matters.  Conducting mandatory training sessions for existing staff on the updated reporting procedures and compliance with federal requirements, with detailed instructions on Financial Reporting Forms emphasizing accuracy and timeliness.  Implementing a tracking system to monitor deadlines and the submission status of all required reports.  Scheduling regular internal audits to verify adherence to these reporting protocols and identify potential gaps in compliance. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025.
Finding 2023-003 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager starting January 2025 who will assume comprehensive oversight of all facets of grant adm...
Finding 2023-003 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager starting January 2025 who will assume comprehensive oversight of all facets of grant administration and compliance. The grant manager's duties will include ensuring that all reimbursement requests are substantiated by adequate documentation, such as actual invoices, payroll registers, and payment records. Key actions include:  Establishing a systematic process for the collection, organization, and retention of all requisite documents.  Implementing internal review and approval procedures to guarantee that every reimbursement request undergoes thorough vetting and receives approval prior to submission, with explicit documentation of the review process.  Instructing both existing and new personnel on these newly instituted procedures to prevent future inconsistencies. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025.
Finding 2023-002 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager starting January 2025 to oversee compliance and internal control processes for federal a...
Finding 2023-002 Name of Responsible Individual: Carolina Liriano, Grant Manager; Holly Forester, Controller; Sheri Brady, VP and Chief Program Officer Corrective Action: CDF hired an Outsourced Grant Manager starting January 2025 to oversee compliance and internal control processes for federal awards, ensuring adherence to 2 CFR Part 200. The Outsourced Grant Manager will implement systems to accurately allocate salaries, wages, and other expenditures. Key actions include:  Payroll Expenditures: Establish procedures to approve payroll allocations based on actual time and effort reporting, requiring supervisor approval and periodic reviews for compliance.  Non-Payroll Expenditures: Develop approval processes for non-payroll expenses, ensuring detailed documentation and implementing checks to verify overhead allocations.  Documentation and Review: Implement a comprehensive filing system for approvals and supporting documents, with regular training for staff.  Ongoing Compliance Monitoring: Conduct periodic internal audits to ensure adherence to internal controls and federal regulations, addressing issues promptly. These measures will strengthen CDF’s internal controls, ensure compliance, and maintain the integrity of federal award management. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025.
View Audit 362526 Questioned Costs: $1
Management instituted policies and procedures for the timely closing and preparation of the financial statements.
Management instituted policies and procedures for the timely closing and preparation of the financial statements.
Finding 571537 (2023-001)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Audit Finding Reference: 2023-001 - Improve Controls and Documentation over Reporting Process Planned Corrective Action: The Town acknowledges the discrepancy noted in the audit finding regarding the timing and documentation of expenditures included in the P&E Annual Report for the ARPA grant. We a...
Audit Finding Reference: 2023-001 - Improve Controls and Documentation over Reporting Process Planned Corrective Action: The Town acknowledges the discrepancy noted in the audit finding regarding the timing and documentation of expenditures included in the P&E Annual Report for the ARPA grant. We appreciate the opportunity to address this issue and confirm that we will implement improvements to strengthen our reporting process. Moving forward, the Town will utilize the MUNIS accounting system more effectively to ensure all expenditures are properly recorded and reported within the appropriate reporting periods. In addition, internal procedures will be reviewed and updated to reinforce timely data entry and review of grant-related transactions. Responsible staff have been made aware of the finding, and steps will be taken to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: May 2025 Persion Resonsible for Corrective Action: Stephanie Pemberton, Town Accountant Please consider this the Town's official corrective action response to be included in the final audit report.
Finding #2023-003: Federal Procedure Manual Federal Program: #10.7 60 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Federal Grantor: US. Department of Agriculture ...
Finding #2023-003: Federal Procedure Manual Federal Program: #10.7 60 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Federal Grantor: US. Department of Agriculture Pass-through Entity: N/A Criteria: Non-federal entities who receive federal or state grants or have grant programs should have documented policies and procedures in place over grants and grant expenditures. Condition: Internal controls over federal grants should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that misstatement in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards would be prevented or detected. Cause: The Village does not have documented policies and procedures in place over grants and grant expenditures. Effect: Without documented policies and procedures, the internal control over federal grants is low, and the risk of misstatement in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards is high. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the Village works on written policies and procedures over grants and grant expenditures. Grantee Response: The Village will work with their auditor to develop and adopt written grant procedures that are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Contact Person: Lee Kucher Anticipated Completion: December 31, 2025
St. John’s Lutheran Home of Albert Lea submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended September 30, 2023. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Lethert, Skwira, Schultz & Co. LLP, 170 E 7th Place, Saint Paul, MN 55101 Audit period: October 1, 2022 – September ...
St. John’s Lutheran Home of Albert Lea submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended September 30, 2023. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Lethert, Skwira, Schultz & Co. LLP, 170 E 7th Place, Saint Paul, MN 55101 Audit period: October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2023 The findings from the September 30, 2023 schedule of findings, questioned costs and recommendations. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT Finding 2023-001 - Auditor Preparation of the Financial Statements Material Weakness Finding Summary: The Organization does not have an internal control system designed to provide for the preparation of the complete consolidated financial statements, including the accompanying footnotes, as required by GAAP. We were also requested to draft the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements. Corrective Action Plan: It is not cost effective to have an internal control system designed to provide for the preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes. We requested that our auditors Lethert, Skwira, Schultz & Co. LLP, prepare the financial statements and the accompanying notes to the financial statements as a part of their annual audit. We have designated a member of management to review the drafted financial statements and accompanying notes. Responsible Individuals: Heather King, Director of Finance, 507-473-1066 Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing
Oversight Agency for Audit Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2023. Name of independent accounting firm: Haynie & Company Audit Period: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. The ...
Oversight Agency for Audit Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2023. Name of independent accounting firm: Haynie & Company Audit Period: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. The finding from the December 31, 2023 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs is discussed below. Finding 2023-1 Comments of the finding and recommendation: Management agrees with the finding. Action taken: We will assign the Executive Director to oversee all federal reporting deadlines and implement a centralized compliance calendar with automated reminders. Internal policies will be updated to require a formal review of reporting documents at least 45 days prior to submission deadlines. Additionally, relevant staff will receive training on Uniform Guidance requirements, and quarterly compliance meetings will be held to monitor progress. These actions are intended to ensure timely and accurate future submissions in accordance with federal regulations. If the oversight agency has questions regarding this plan, please email Steven Cordova, executive director of Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries at scordova@totalconcept.net. Sincerely yours, Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries
2023-006 Management Response: Management respectfully disagrees with this Finding. • Under Condition, the finding states, “Time and effort is being tracked and maintained by employees, including hours charged to the specific efforts for the programs.…” This is not accurate. Employees report th...
2023-006 Management Response: Management respectfully disagrees with this Finding. • Under Condition, the finding states, “Time and effort is being tracked and maintained by employees, including hours charged to the specific efforts for the programs.…” This is not accurate. Employees report their time worked each day, including the amount of time they worked on different projects if applicable. Employees report this in our commercial HRIS/Payroll system, where it is maintained and where it is reviewed and approved by the employee’s manager. The employees report the time they worked and which project(s) they worked on, their managers review and approve the time and the distribution, and the data is tracked and maintained in our HRIS/Payroll system (ExponentHR). • Also under Condition, the finding states, “The specific amount of employee salaries and wages that are allocated to specific federal programs for reimbursement, and which are less than the amounts reflected in time and effort records, are determined by members of the finance staff.” It is correct that we would have to invoice sponsors for less than the total cost of an employee’s allocated time and effort if a sponsor’s budget is not sufficient to cover that full amount. This is the correct procedure to follow. Employees correctly continue documenting their hours worked on a specific project even if the budget is expended and the accounting staff can no longer bill the sponsor. If a particular grant does not have sufficient sponsor funds, then the Grants Accounting staff reduce the bill accordingly. • Also under Condition, the finding states, “The rationale for the amount actually allocated for reimbursement, if less than the amount reflected in time and effort records, is not documented”. This is incorrect. Our monthly invoices to each sponsor accumulate, with each invoice clearly showing not only that month’s expense but also the year-to-date expense and remaining balance, which forces the sponsor invoice to stop at an amount less than the total cost of employees’ time and effort when the budget is exhausted. • Also under Condition, the finding states, “Review and approval of the allocation of employee compensation to specific federal programs reimbursement requests is not maintained.” Each employee records their hours worked, and the project(s) on which they worked those hours, in our HRIS/Payroll system. The employee’s manager reviews and approves both the hours worked and the projects on which the hours were worked. This review and approval is maintained in our HRIS/Payroll system. Financial staff calculate the amount to allocate to specific federal programs based on these HRIS/Payroll system records (or other records such as clinical units produced, based on the terms of each grant). Separate accounting staff review the sponsor invoice and post the Receivable once they deem the invoice correct. • Under Cause, the finding states, “…..the Organization has not implemented a structured process for documenting the extent to which allowable [emphasis added] compensation costs will be allocated for reimbursement to specific federal programs in instances where the allowable compensation cost exceeds the amount allocated for reimbursement.” This means that we do not have a process for documenting how much of a payroll expense already deemed allowable on a particular grant will actually be invoiced there. We disagree and believe that the presence and documentation of a limited sponsor budget, along with cumulative tracking and documentation of compensation expenses against that budget, proves and documents why sometimes full compensation costs are not charged to a grant. • Under Possible Effect, the finding addresses possible effects of “the absence of documented allocation methodologies.” We don’t agree that our process could lead to improper allocation between federal programs (as the finding states) nor to misstating federal expenditures (as the finding states). When a sponsor’s budget is insufficient to cover its appropriately allocated compensation costs, those costs are paid from unrestricted, non-federal funds. As also noted in the finding, no questioned costs were identified.
2023 – 005 - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance: Allowable Costs and Activities Recommendation: 1. Implement a Formal Expenditure Review and Approval Policy – Establish a policy requiring that all expenditures charged to grants be reviewed and approved by an appropriate...
2023 – 005 - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance: Allowable Costs and Activities Recommendation: 1. Implement a Formal Expenditure Review and Approval Policy – Establish a policy requiring that all expenditures charged to grants be reviewed and approved by an appropriate individual before being recorded in the system. 2. Require Documentation of Review and Approval – Ensure that invoices, payroll allocations, and other cost support documents include a signature, initials, or system-generated approval to confirm review. 3. Utilize System-Based Controls – If possible, configure the financial system to require electronic approval for all grant-related expenditures before costs are recorded. Management View: Management partially agrees with the finding. While we acknowledge that documentation of expenditure approval was not always retrievable, we believe the expenditures reviewed were all appropriate. Finding 2023-006 refers to the auditors’ assessment of expenditure review and approval processes that occurred in Calendar Year 2023. During Calendar Year 2023, Prism relied on email routing of expenditures for review and approval. As of this writing, Prism Health North Texas’ expenditure review and approval processes already meet or exceed the recommendations above. Action Taken: 1. Expenditure Review – All expenditures charged to grants are reviewed and approved by two qualified individuals. 2. Documentation of Review and Approval – a. Such review and approval for non-payroll expenditures occur in and are documented in the SAP Concur software before the costs are recorded in the accounting system (Abila). b. Such review and approval for payroll-related expenditures occur via and are documented via a combination of methods, also before they are recorded in Abila. i. Employees report their time, including how much time was devoted to grant activities, in the ExponentHR payroll system, and their supervisors approve both the time and the allocation in that system. ii. Programmatic measures that also support grant billing (“units”) are calculated from activity documented in the athenaOne electronic health record (EHR). iii. Payroll allocation is calculated by one person, based on the ExponentHR documentation and the units, then reviewed and imported into Abila by a second person. The unposted transactions are reviewed again before posting. 3. Utilize System-Based Controls – In place as above. Anticipated Completion Date: The recommendations are already in place. Responsible Contact Person(s): • Name: General Laffitte • Title: Vice President of Finance and Accounting • Phone: 214-623-6896 • Address: 3900 Junius St. Ste. 300, Dallas, Texas 75246 • Name: Jana Voege • Title: Chief Financial Officer Address: 3900 Junius St. Ste. 300, Dallas, Texas 75246 Corrective Action Plan Date: 4/28/2025 Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit Prism Health North Texas respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended FY2023. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Armanino LLP 15950 Dallas Pkwy #600, Dallas, TX 75248 (972) 661 - 1843 Audit Period: The consolidated financial statements of AIDS Arms, Inc. were audited for the period of calendar year 2022 and 2023. The findings from the year ended December 31, 2023, schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The Findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule.
2023 – 004 Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Preparation, Reconciliation, and Retention of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Recommendation: 4. Develop a Standardized SEFA Reconciliation Process – Implement formal policies and procedures requiring that SEFA expenditure...
2023 – 004 Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Preparation, Reconciliation, and Retention of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Recommendation: 4. Develop a Standardized SEFA Reconciliation Process – Implement formal policies and procedures requiring that SEFA expenditures be reconciled to the general ledger on a monthly basis, with documentation maintained for audit purposes. 5. Enhance System Controls for Grant Expenditures – Modify the financial system to allow for the proper segregation of state and federal expenditures from non-grant funds, ensuring that expenditures are properly classified at the time of entry. 6. Require Monthly Documentation Reviews – Establish a control requiring management to review and approve SEFA reconciliation schedules on a monthly or quarterly basis to ensure accuracy and completeness. 7. Implement a Centralized Documentation Retention Policy – Require that all SEFA-related reconciliation records, including general ledger tie-outs and manual adjustments, be retained in a centralized, accessible location. 8. Provide Grants Management Training – Conduct training for grants management and accounting personnel on SEFA preparation requirements, including Uniform Guidance compliance and best practices for documentation and reconciliation. Management View: Management partially agrees with the finding. While we acknowledge that documentation supporting SEFA reconciliation was incomplete, we believe that federal expenditures were properly accounted for. We would like to address some of the auditors’ points individually: • “The SEFA is prepared based on amounts requested for reimbursement instead of directly based on expenditures incurred.” Most grant awards do not fully fund the programs they support, most grant awards do not run concurrently with Prism Health North Texas’ fiscal year (i.e., with the Calendar Year), and most grant awards are not spent in equal monthly amounts. It is correct that the 2023 SEFA was based on grant-appropriate expenditures that occurred during Calendar Year 2023 and were submitted to those grant sponsors for reimbursement. This will not necessarily reach the full cost to Prism for each grant-supported program, nor is it likely to exactly match any annual grant award amount. • “Expenses recorded in the general ledger represent expenses incurred to operate the program in addition to direct grant expenditures; the Organization only requests reimbursement for direct program expenditures allowable under the program.” As we confirmed verbally with the audit partner on April 25, 2025, this statement is intended to provide information and context and is not a criticism or intended to point out any problem. As stated above, most grant awards do not fully fund the programs they support; therefore, the general ledger necessarily includes both expenses the sponsor will reimburse and expenses the sponsor will not reimburse. Nonetheless, we are enhancing our reconciliation procedures and documentation practices to fully meet audit requirements. Finding 2023-004 refers to the auditors’ assessment of the SEFA preparation and reconciliation processes that occurred in Calendar Year 2023. As of this writing, Prism Health North Texas has already changed its SEFA preparation and reconciliation processes and meets many of the recommendations above. Action Taken: 4. Documentation Retention – On April 25, 2025, management created a structured and easily accessible system for storing all relevant information for all grants management personnel. a. A logical naming system for files identifying the SEFA period, the funding agency and identified general ledger expenditures claimed on the SEFA. b. We are now documenting the difference between all GL transactions and those submitted for sponsor reimbursement (i.e., SEFA components) in a single document per fund code, arranged by fiscal year. Previously this documentation was kept by invoice and arranged by grant year. c. Management will continue to ensure all expenditure-related support, such as invoices and purchase orders, is saved electronically to all financial transactions. 5. SEFA Reconciliation – Management has decided to move from an annual to quarterly SEFA reconciliation process to enhance the frequency of management oversight in SEFA draft preparation. VP of Finance will prepare the SEFA for independent review by the CFO. This will be put into a written policy/procedure. 6. System Enhancements – Prism’s current accounting system does not accommodate this. However, Prism is already in the later stages of selecting a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solution, with this as one of our key selection criteria. Our new ERP should allow for expenditures within the same cost center to be identified as grant-reimbursable or non-grant-reimbursable at the time of entry. We have identified opportunities in new financial management software solutions that we are scheduled to demo May 12th and the 16th of 2025. Opportunities such as: a. The ability to tag grant-reimbursable transactions, to segment our award cost center into two important categories. i. The full cost to manage a specific program ii. Identified cost claimed on the SEFA b. Dedicated grant modules that will allow us to establish business rules and workflows to streamline and digitize critical aspects of grant management. 7. Staff Engagement – Cross department coordination meetings occur monthly between the Finance organization and the Grants Management team to continue to foster alignment and collaboration in our grant cycles. A general overview of SEFA, including how to prepare and organize the monthly reconciliations, has already occurred with some of the grants accountants. Anticipated Completion Date: We expect all but system enhancements to be in place by July 31st, 2025, to contribute significantly to the strength of our internal controls and stakeholder confidence in our SEFA reporting. Responsible Contact Person(s): • Name: General Laffitte • Title: Vice President of Finance and Accounting • Phone: 214-623-6896 • Address: 3900 Junius St. Ste. 300, Dallas, Texas 75246 • Name: Jana Voege • Title: Chief Financial Officer • Address: 3900 Junius St. Ste. 300, Dallas, Texas 75246
Finding No. 2023-007 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordanc...
Finding No. 2023-007 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordance with the Rehabilitation and Preservation Activities (570.202(b)(2) and/or (11)) during the grant period.. Condition The owner paid 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested, that was not incurred during the grant period and charged through to and was reimbursed by PHB under their CDBG Grant. Cause REACH's Community Builders Program Manager did not ensure that the invoices were for the appropriate grant period. Effect or Potential Effect CDBG funds may be spent inappropriately and REACH may be required to repay the grants and it may also result in a possible loss of future grants. Questioned Costs: $35. Context In connection with the procedures applied to compliance testing, there was 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested that was not for cost incurred during the grant period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation REACH Community Builders Program Manager should follow procedures to ensure each vendor invoice is incurred during the grant period. Views of Responsible Officials Community Builders Program cell phone billing is part of the larger REACH billing system and this does create some challenges in approving billing as our IT department approves this billing. We are putting systems in place for the Community Builders Program Manager will work closer with the finance team to ensure all billing involves are for the correct time periods.
View Audit 362297 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding No. 2023-006 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordanc...
Finding No. 2023-006 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordance with the Rehabilitation and Preservation Activities (570.202(b)(2) and/or (11)). Condition The owner paid 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested, that were not listed on the CDBG Address List as reported to Portland Housing Bureau (“PHB”) and charged through to and was reimbursed by PHB under their CDBG Grant. Cause REACH's Community Builders Program Manager did not ensure that the invoices were for an approved CDBG property. Effect or Potential Effect CDBG funds may be spent inappropriately and REACH may be required to repay the grants and it may also result in a possible loss of future grants. Questioned Costs: $40. Context In connection with the procedures applied to compliance testing, there was 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested that was not for an approved CDBG property. Repeat Finding: Yes – Finding 2022-007 Recommendation REACH Community Builders Program Manager should follow procedures to match each vendor invoice to the approved CDBG property listing prior to coding to CDBG and passing through for reimbursement from this grant. Views of Responsible Officials This instance was $40 that was in fact allocated incorrectly and the $40 spend was paid back to PHB in October 2024.
View Audit 362297 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding No. 2023-005 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N- Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with the Clark Count...
Finding No. 2023-005 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N- Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with the Clark County Community Services CDBG Procedures Manual and grant documents. Condition In connection with our lease file review we noted two instances of seven tenants tested where management was unable to locate tenant files. Cause Management’s policies with respect to eligibility and the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with Compliance in Clark County Community Services CDBG Procedures Manual and grant documents were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants. Questioned Costs: N/A. Context In connection with the procedures applied to our CDBG units testing, two of the seven tenants tested did have lease files available. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to ensure that correct income verification procedures are performed timely, tenant eligibility is correctly determined and that tenant lease files are properly maintained in accordance with the requirements of Clark County Community Services CDBG Procedures Manual and grant documents. Views of Responsible Officials The Compliance Specialist discovered missing files at a property while pulling files for the audit. The Compliance team worked to contact residents and rebuild the files with the missing documents. Compliance management investigated and determined the cause of the missing documents was due to a prior site manager not scanning and filing the appropriate documents, along with high staff turnover during this time. The Compliance team is finalizing a new procedure, in addition to the existing, to audit Yardi Voyager for uploaded completed files after move-in and recertification: the goal of this is to catch missing files and documents timely and hold site teams accountable for following the required procedures.
Finding No. 2023-004 HUD Low Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990 Federal Assistance Listing Number #99.999 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N- Special Tests and Provisions Criteria In accordance with the Use Agreement, Housing Quality Standards require th...
Finding No. 2023-004 HUD Low Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990 Federal Assistance Listing Number #99.999 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N- Special Tests and Provisions Criteria In accordance with the Use Agreement, Housing Quality Standards require that the Owner shall maintain the property in good repair and condition. Condition Management did not have in place proper procedures and controls to ensure that HQS inspections were performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Cause Management did not perform HQS inspections during the year ended December 31 2023. Effect or Potential Effect Housing units may be out of compliance with HUD Quality Standards. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to tenant file testing there were 3 instances of the 3 files tested where the passing HQS inspections were not performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation Management should resume making sure all units meet the HUD Housing Quality Standards and ensure that the responses to any findings are cleared timely. Views of Responsible Officials REACH did return to doing HQS Inspections in 2023, with staffing shortages it is possible that not every unit was inspected in 2023. Specifically, around the 3 instances of the 3 files tested after the finding were provided to REACH we provided the annual inspection for unit #11 at Beacon. For unit #5 at Beacon the annual inspection was not in the current resident file that was tested because the unit was vacant at the time of 2023 annual inspection. The annual inspection for the last file at Taylor this inspection was missed due to staffing changes at the time. REACH continued to reestablish our annual unit inspection process post COVID in 2024.
« 1 1003 1004 1006 1007 2242 »