Corrective Action Plans

Federal Program, Assistance Listing Number and Name - ALN 10.557, Department of Agriculture, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Condition: Original Finding Description - The City did not have adequate controls in place to ensure obligations were liquidated (paid) within the required 60 days from the end of the grant period and certain costs were liquidated after 60 days. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action / Anticipated Completion Date - Regina Greear, Terri Daniels, Denise Fair; Anticipated completion date: June 2025 Planned Corrective Action - The City has ongoing efforts to implement enhanced processes over the final review of invoices to address timing related to the liquidation requirement.

Name of Auditee: Springfield Housing Authority Name of Audit Firm: EFPR Group, CPAs, PLLC Period Covered by the Audit: March 31, 2024 CAP Prepared by: Denise Jordan, Executive Director Phone: (413) 785-4500 (A) Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (4) Finding 2024-004 (a) Comments on the finding and recommendation - The Authority agrees with the finding. The Authority also agrees with the recommendations, please see below for action taken. (b) Action taken - The Authority will implement controls to ensure all Capital Fund Program grants are accurately reported and finalized with HUD within the required due dates. (c) Planned implementation date of corrective action - Completed by March 31, 2025.

Finding Number: 2024-001 Condition: The University did not complete full grant closeout procedures in a timely manner for 10 out of 25 grants that were tested with a period of performance that ended in the year ended June 30, 2024. For 2 of those 10, there was not an independent review of the closeout checklist performed. Planned Corrective Action: SRS Accounting works closely with the departments on grant closeouts. Although a checklist was not signed by a supervisor, many of these awards had departmental agreement of final expenses. In two cases, the award was fully spent. System restrictions prevent spending 90 days after the grant end date. Due to department and system controls, no unallowable costs were reported on any award. SRS accounting will provide further award closeout training to its team members. Additionally, SRS Accounting added a supervisory team member, which will help mitigate this situation going forward. Contact person responsible for corrective action: John Ungruhe Anticipated Completion Date: 03/01/2025

Finding Number 2023-091 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) ALN: 21.019 Federal Program name: Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERA) Planned Corrective Action 1. Condition and Context: While documenting controls over Period of Performance for the ERA 1 grant, we noted payments made to subrecipients in the Statewide Accounting System were all put under one fund and were not distinguishable between ERA 1 and ERA 2. Therefore, OMES was unable to determine at a glance whether the funds distributed to subrecipients were attributable to ERA 1 or ERA 2. Further, we determined one of the subrecipients, Communities Foundation of Oklahoma (CFO), did not have sufficient internal controls over ERA 1 program spending to ensure all funds were expended by the end of the period of performance. • We disagree with SAI on the Statewide Accounting System separation of funds. The Statewide Accounting System did distinguish between ERA1 and ERA2. The Statewide Accounting System has funds 49400 and 49200 shows establishment of both federal funds in 2021. • We disagree with SAI on CFO’s internal controls. CFO did have internal controls in place to ensure funds were expended during the period of performance. Per ERA 1 Closeout Resource “The end date of the award period of performance is the last day for a grantee to obligate funds for ERA1 activities (September 30, 2022, for award funds received pursuant to the grantee’s initial allocation and December 29, 2022, for reallocated funds). Per documentation provided by SAI the general ledger shows a date before December 29, 2022. (Attachment 494,492, ERA Closeout Resource) 2. For eight of 30, or 26.67% of adjustments tested, the adjustment was to move expenses from ERA 2 to ERA 1 to meet ERA 1 spending requirements prior to closeout of the program. CFO comingled ERA 1 and ERA 2 funds and could not directly support each recharacterization with documentation for the specific transactions involved, but stated it was recharacterized to meet ERA 1 spending limits prior to the end of the period. In addition, CFO did not go back to revise any prior monthly or quarterly reports as required by Treasury. • We partially agree. We agree that funds cannot be moved from ERA 2 to ERA 1. • We disagree with SAI on comingling of funds. CFO did not comingle funds. CFO has 31 separate accounts within C-Suite their financial software. All accounts are listed and examples provided in the ERA Fund Open Report. • We disagree with SAI’s evaluation of the Treasury reporting requirement. CFO was not required to go back and revise prior monthly and quarterly reports per federal guidance. “As of December 2022, ERA1 grantees will only be able to edit their Final Report or as applicable, their Q4 2022 report. However, grantees may submit revisions to certain financial data submitted with their past quarterly reports, specifically, subrecipient/contractor/direct payee records; subaward/contract/direct payment records; and expenditure records when completing their Final Report or as applicable, their Q4 2022 Report. “While ERA1 grantees are no longer able to submit or revise any prior ERA1 quarterly reports, grantees may receive additional communications from Treasury’s compliance team to make corrections to past quarterly reports and as appropriate, the Final Report…” (Attachment ERA Closeout Resource pg 5) 3. For 11 of 30, or 36.67%, the adjustment was to move expenses between jurisdictions (City, State, County), which is unallowable per FAQ #42 and ERA reporting guidance. • We disagree with SAI’s unallowable cost. Due to a misunderstanding, CFO staff misstated that funds were moved between jurisdictions. Funds were not moved between jurisdictions. If a computer error occurred due to the large volume of checks that were being sent every week (approximately 1,600), not all errors were caught immediately. However, when further reviews were conducted and it was discovered a payment was issued incorrectly, the proper accounting procedures for correcting the errors were completed. (Attachment OneDrive_2025- 4-23(1)) • We disagree. FAQ 42 says nothing about jurisdictions. FAQ #42 states, “May a grantee provide ERA funds to another entity for the purpose of making payments more rapidly? To speed the delivery of assistance, grantees may enter into a written agreement with a nonprofit organization to establish a payment fund for the sole purpose of delivering assistance using ERA funds while a household’s application remains in process. A grantee may use such a process if: The process is reserved for situations in which an expedited payment could reasonably be viewed as necessary to prevent an eviction or loss of utility services that precludes employing the grantee’s standard application and payment procedures on a timely basis. The nonprofit organization has the requisite financial capacity to manage the ERA funds, such as being a certified community development financial institution. The nonprofit organization deposits and maintains the ERA funds in a separate account that is not commingled with other funds. The grantee receives all required application and eligibility documentation within six months. The nonprofit organization agrees in writing to return to the grantee any assistance that the household was ineligible for or for which the required documentation is not received within six months. Any funds not used by the nonprofit organization are ultimately returned to the grantee. If a payment made by the nonprofit organization is subsequently found to have been used for an ineligible household or an ineligible expense, or if the required application and eligibility documentation are not timely submitted, the payment will be considered an ineligible use of ERA funds by the grantee. Any administrative expenses attributable to a payment fund should be considered in accordance with FAQ 29.” (Attachment ERA FAQs) 4. When performing our testwork to determine whether ERA 1 expenditures met period of performance requirements (incurred on or before September 30, 2022), we noted 207 transactions occurred after September 30, 2022. Of the 207 transactions, we noted 40 that resulted in $10,711,668 (of this amount $2,313,435 is already questioned above) in questioned costs. • We disagree with SAI’s questioning of expenditures incurred after September 30, 2022. Per the ERA 1 Closeout Resource, “The end date of the award period of performance is the last day for a grantee to obligate funds for ERA1 activities (September 30, 2022, for award funds received pursuant to the grantee’s initial allocation and December 29, 2022, for reallocated funds). Per documentation provided by SAI, the general ledger shows a date before December 29, 2022. (Attachment ERA Closeout Resource pgs 1, 4) 5. For 13 of 207, or 6.28% of transactions tested, the adjustment was to move funds between funding jurisdictions (City, State, County), which is unallowable per FAQ #42 and ERA reporting guidance. (This resulted in $1,594,881 in questioned costs, of which $24,450 is questioned above) • We disagree with SAI’s questioned cost. Due to a misunderstanding CFO staff misstated that funds were moved between jurisdictions. Funds were not moved between jurisdictions. If a computer error occurred due to the large volume of checks that were being sent every week (approximately 1,600), not all errors were caught immediately. However, when further reviews were conducted and it was discovered a payment was issued incorrectly, the proper accounting procedures for correcting the errors were completed. (Attachment OneDrive_2025- 4-23(1)) • We disagree. FAQ #42 says nothing about jurisdictions. FAQ #42 states “May a grantee provide ERA funds to another entity for the purpose of making payments more rapidly? To speed the delivery of assistance, grantees may enter into a written agreement with a nonprofit organization to establish a payment fund for the sole purpose of delivering assistance using ERA funds while a household’s application remains in process. A grantee may use such a process if: The process is reserved for situations in which an expedited payment could reasonably be viewed as necessary to prevent an eviction or loss of utility services that precludes employing the grantee’s standard application and payment procedures on a timely basis. The nonprofit organization has the requisite financial capacity to manage the ERA funds, such as being a certified community development financial institution. The nonprofit organization deposits and maintains the ERA funds in a separate account that is not commingled with other funds. The grantee receives all required application and eligibility documentation within six months. The nonprofit organization agrees in writing to return to the grantee any assistance that the household was ineligible for or for which the required documentation is not received within six months. Any funds not used by the nonprofit organization are ultimately returned to the grantee. If a payment made by the nonprofit organization is subsequently found to have been used for an ineligible household or an ineligible expense, or if the required application and eligibility documentation are not timely submitted, the payment will be considered an ineligible use of ERA funds by the grantee. Any administrative expenses attributable to a payment fund should be considered in accordance with FAQ 29.” (Attachment ERA FAQs) 6. For 11 of 207, or 5.31%, the adjustment was to move funds between ERA 2 and ERA 1 and the adjustment was not directly supported with documentation for the specific transactions involved. It was noted as recharacterized to meet ERA 1 spending limits prior to the end of the period, and CFO did not go back to revise any prior monthly or quarterly reports as required by Treasury. (This resulted in $7,003,715 in questioned costs, of which $2,200,000 is questioned above) • Partially agree. • We agree that funds cannot be moved from ERA2 to ERA1 • We disagree with SAI’s evaluation of the Treasury reporting requirement. CFO was not required to go back and revise prior monthly and quarterly reports per federal guidance. “As of December 2022, ERA1 grantees will only be able to edit their Final Report or as applicable, their Q4 2022 report. However, grantees may submit revisions to certain financial data submitted with their past quarterly reports, specifically, subrecipient/contractor/direct payee records; subaward/contract/direct payment records; and expenditure records when completing their Final Report or as applicable, their Q4 2022 Report. “While ERA1 grantees are no longer able to submit or revise any prior ERA1 quarterly reports, grantees may receive additional communications from Treasury’s compliance team to make corrections to past quarterly reports and as appropriate, the Final Report…” (Attachment ERA Closeout Resource pg 5) 7. For 7 of 207, or 3.38% of transactions tested, the adjustment was to ‘correct accounts’ or ‘tie out accounts’; we determined these were not attributable to specific transactions but were ‘plug’ numbers to zero out the ERA 1 balance prior to the end of the period of performance to meet spend down requirements and were not supported by actual expenditures that can be determined to have been incurred on or before September 30, 2022. (This resulted in $1,837,072 in questioned costs, of which $88,985 is questioned above) • We partially agree. • We agree that funds cannot be moved from ERA 1 to ERA 2 • We disagree with SAI’s questioning of expenditures incurred after September 30, 2022. Per the ERA 1 Closeout Resource, “The end date of the award period of performance is the last day for a grantee to obligate funds for ERA1 activities (September 30, 2022, for award funds received pursuant to the grantee’s initial allocation and December 29, 2022, for reallocated funds). Per documentation provided by SAI, the general ledger shows a date before December 29, 2022. (Attachment ERA Closeout Resource pgs 1, 4) 8. For 7 of 207, or 3.38% of transactions tested, the adjustment was to CFO management fees. Management fees were retained on a percentage basis; therefore, the fee is not supported by actual expenditures that can be determined to have been incurred on or before September 30, 2022. (This resulted in $1,430,228 in questioned costs which were all questioned on finding 2023-028). We disagree with SAI’s questioning of expenditures incurred after September 30, 2022. Per the ERA 1 Closeout Resource, “The end date of the award period of performance is the last day for a grantee to obligate funds for ERA1 activities (September 30, 2022, for award funds received pursuant to the grantee’s initial allocation and December 29, 2022, for reallocated funds). Per documentation provided by SAI, the general ledger shows a date before December 29, 2022. (Attachment ERA Closeout Resource pgs 1, 9. We noted a total of $8,271,796 in management fees that were not expended for ERA 1 and therefore were not spent within the period of performance. Of this amount, $6,841,568 were management fees questioned in the SFY2021 and SFY2022 State of Oklahoma Single Audit reports and the remaining $1,430,228 is questioned on finding 2023-028. We disagree with SAI’s questioning of expenditures incurred after September 30, 2022. Per the ERA 1 Closeout Resource, “The end date of the award period of performance is the last day for a grantee to obligate funds for ERA1 activities (September 30, 2022, for award funds received pursuant to the grantee’s initial allocation and December 29, 2022, for reallocated funds). Per documentation provided by SAI, the general ledger shows a date before December 29, 2022. (Attachment ERA Closeout Resource pgs 1, 4) 10. For 2 of 207, or 0.97% of transactions tested, the payment was not supported by an itemized invoice to enable a determination that all the costs were incurred prior to September 30, 2022. (This resulted in $276,000 in questioned costs) • We disagree with SAI questioning cost and have provided supporting documentation in OneDrive - 2025-04-23(2) to show questioned expenditures. • We disagree with SAI’s questioning of expenditures incurred after September 30, 2022. Per the ERA 1 Closeout Resource, “The end date of the award period of performance is the last day for a grantee to obligate funds for ERA1 activities (September 30, 2022, for award funds received pursuant to the grantee’s initial allocation and December 29, 2022, for reallocated funds). Per documentation provided by SAI, the general ledger shows a date before December 29, 2022. (Attachment OneDrive -2025-04-23(2), ERA Closeout Resource pgs 1, 4 ) Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) acknowledges the Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector Office’s (SAI) findings that OMES did not implement the proper internal controls and oversight of the ERA Program during FY2023. However, OMES has taken steps to correct these findings and follow the recommendations set forth by SAI. Beginning with FY2025, OMES has taken the following measures: • Oversight and management of the ERA program has been transferred to the OMES Grant Management Office (OMES-GMO) which has staff with several years of grant experience. OMES-GMO has recently hired additional staff, and the two staff members dedicated to the management of the ERA program have 20+ years of combined federal grant specific experience. To ensure that the subrecipient agreement includes all the required terms under the ERA Program and that the agreement does not expire, OMES-GMO and the Communities of Foundation of Oklahoma (CFO) have recently executed a Subrecipient Grant Agreement Amendment that details the responsibilities of OMES to monitor CFO and the duties and processes that CFO must follow in regard to ERA Program, including detailed cash management policies. See Attached – Grant Agreement Amendment. • OMES-GMO required the return of the remaining ERA2 Program funds from CFO to ensure proper oversight and review of ERA expenditures is performed. • OMES-GMO has a multi-level system of internal controls for grant management and oversight that includes routine monitoring, desk review, and site visits for all projects and associated project/administrative expenditures to ensure allowability, accuracy, and assist in the detection of fraud. For example, OMES-GMO’s process for disbursing funds to a subrecipient requires a written request from the subrecipient with supporting documentation, then OMES-GMO assigns a staff lead and secondary grant analyst to perform a primary and secondary review for compliance and to require additional supporting documentation if needed to approve the request. Once those reviews are completed and approved by the OMES-GMO staff, the Director of the OMES-GMO must approve the request before it is sent to the OMES Finance Division, who will then verify the calculated amount(s) before completing the disbursement to the subrecipient. These internal controls and policies have been implemented for the management and oversight of the ERA Program and provide a multilayer review that will prevent fraud and risk factors applicable to the ERA program. Additionally, the OMES-GMO staff assigned to the ERA program have the training and knowledge to ensure compliance with the Federal grant requirements. • Depending on the level of risk, OMES-GMO conducts monthly, bi-weekly or weekly meetings with each subrecipient to monitor the progress of projects and address any issues or changes that might impact the project. For the ERA Program, OMES-GMO conducts bi-weekly monitoring meetings with CFO and is currently reviewing documentation provided by CFO to ensure all current ERA projects are eligible under the ERA guidelines and that CFO is exercising the proper oversight over their subrecipients. • OMES-GMO will continue with their current ERA monitoring steps and internal controls and will work with CFO to ensure ERA program funds are spent in accordance with ERA program guidelines and state and federal regulations. Anticipated Completion Date Ongoing throughout the life of the grant Responsible Contact Person Brandy Manek

The Board of County Commissioners, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. The Board of County Commissioners will work with all elected officials, the third-party administrator, and federal, state and local partners to develop policies, procedures, and internal controls designed to accurately track grants, including the application process, verification, oversight, and reporting of grant requirements. To assist in this process, the Board of County Commissioners engaged a third-party administrator to oversee the grant process, including application, eligibility, review, requirements, contracting, recipient tracking and oversight, and documentation and reporting. The Board of County Commissioners will work with the third-party administrator to ensure proper grant administration.

The Board of County Commissioners will take measures to ensure future compliance with all requirements of federal grants.

Management accepts this finding. Sponsored Research Service and the Controller’s Office work in tandem on the closing process. The Controller’s office has a schedule of projects ready to close and has assigned this pool of projects among the research accounting staff. In February 2024, the Controller’s Office hired a second Research Accountant. With the additions of these two positions the University will work towards closing out projects within 90-120 days. In March 2024, the Controller’s Office developed a Close out excel form to aid in capturing each of the necessary steps required on the accounting side of the process.

All management will be educated on the procurement policy as well as the information noted from the CFR sections indicated in the findings by the Director of Finance. The Director of Finance will research and provide education to the Executive Leadership related to this finding during the Executive Leadership meeting. All Grants and cooperative agreements must be filed with the fiscal department. All expenditures must be approved prior to purchase / payment with sign off from Executive Director or Director of Finance.

Assistance listing number and program name: 21.023 COVID-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program Agency: Arizona Department of Economic Security (DES) Name of contact person and title: Leanna DeKing, DES Policy Planning Project Manager Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2025 Agency’s Response: Concur The Department of Economic Security will address the audit recommendations as follows: The Department will ensure program costs are properly recorded in the financial system during the period of performance and only obligated costs are spent during the liquidation period. Closeout activities, such as direct administrative costs, will be obligated prior to the end of the award period and spent within the liquidation period, or 120 calendar days after the period of performance ends. The Department will allocate sufficient resources to perform essential grant closeout functions to help prevent inappropriate charges. The Department will also update existing grant closeout procedures to require a review and approval of grant expenditures during the liquidation period to ensure they are allowable and properly obligated prior to the period of performance end date.

Assistance Listing 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Views of the Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: OHS agrees with the issues outlined, which stem from the delayed processing of invoices and untimely payments. These challenges are largely the result of longstanding issues with over-allocations and the need to catch up on processing a backlog of documents. We appreciate you bringing this to our attention, as it provides an opportunity to refine our procedures and put in place measures to prevent these issues from recurring in the future. This feedback will be valuable as we work to improve our processes and enhance our ability to manage workloads more effectively. Contact Person: Jerome R. Hill, Director of Compliance, Office of Homeless Services, 215-686-0371, 215-520-3556

2023-003: Deficiency in Internal Controls and Compliance Finding -COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – ALN 84.425: Two final financial reports due during the prior fiscal years were not submitted. (Questioned Costs: None) The Town of Clinton/School Department will follow grants closeout procedures, consequently, the district will monitor closely all grants spending throughout each grant cycle. For both state-administered and direct grants, regardless of the period of availability, the District must liquidate all obligations incurred under the award Reports not later than 90 days after the end of the funding period unless an extension is authorized. These procedures have been updated in the Financial Procedures Manual (pages 226-230 under Section G— Timely Obligation of Funds)

The Board of County Commissioners will take measures to ensure future compliance with all requirements of federal grants.

Corrective Action: Management will update written procedures and train the Grants Accounting team regarding period of performance to ensure all requests are made within the proper period based on the period of performance. The procedures and training will include grant period close, cost allowability, requirements for documentation, and review of charges prior to requests. In addition, Grants Accounting has initiated monthly meetings with grantors to closely monitor grant spenddown, address any processing issues, and ensure proper cut-off. These meetings will be instrumental in tracking progress and oversight in our grant management process. Name of Responsible Individual(s): Jason Brenier, Shelly Courtois, and Judy Bokhari Anticipated Completion Date: April 2024

The Board of County Commissioners will take measures to ensure future compliance with all requirements of federal grants.

FINDING 2023-001 Finding Subject: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Reporting Summary of Finding: The Kosciusko County Sheriff's Office applied for the Indiana Local Body Camera Grant (ILBC). The sheriff’s office was awarded this grant on January 1, 2023, with a grant cost amount of up to $31,920. This grant is a reimbursable grant through the Indiana Department of Homeland Security. The period of performance was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The Kosciusko County Sheriff's Office ordered body-worn cameras and equipment on April 26, 2023. The invoice for the cameras and the camera equipment was paid on July 14, 2023. The Kosciusko County Sheriff's Office then submitted a Reimbursement Claim Form on September 11, 2023. The Reimbursement Claim Form shows the Sheriff's Office incorrectly requested the full $31,920. They received $31,920 from the Indiana Department of Homeland Security on September 27, 2023. However, the county had only spent $9,581 of the grant money towards the body camera purchase. Therefore, there is a remaining balance in the fund of $22,339 as of December 31, 2023. Due to the period of performance, the county should have reimbursed the Indiana Department of Homeland Security $22,339. On May 9, 2023, the Sheriff's Office grant administrator submitted a Program Report for the ILBC grant. This report was filed without an implemented internal control or evidence of a review. The report was completed and submitted by the Sheriff's Office grant administrator. The report incorrectly indicated that all expenditures had been completed. As of the date of the submission, the county had not purchased the bodyworn cameras and all federal funds had not been expended. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Alyssa Schmucker Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 574-372-2325 aschmucker@kosciusko.in.gov View of Responsible Officials: We concur with the findings identified. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The Kosciusko Sheriff’s Office, grant coordinator will contact IDHS for instruction on how to return the $22,339.00 and prepare a claim to be processed by the Kosciusko County Auditor’s office. The grant balances are submitted each month by departments these are checked and confirmed by the Auditor’s Office this one was overlooked in the review process. The person who applied for the grant no longer works for the county. It is believed the new person handling the grants was not aware that this grant even existed. The Grant Administrator(s) will have someone sign off on the grant report submissions and forward all reports to the Auditor’s Office. Anticipated Completion Date: It is anticipated that this will be completed as soon as the information to return the funds is received from the state and the claim is submitted to the Auditor for payment. This claim will be paid as soon as it is received. On or before 12/31/2024.

Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Condition: Final financial report revenues and expenditures were overstated in the Town’s general ledger. Corrective Action Planned: The School Business Office has implemented a process to reconcile grants funds by compiling the incoming payments for the schools department and sending the details, along with the correct account numbers for each payment to both the town treasurer and accountant. Review of general ledger will be completed when Final Financial Reports are filed to ensure accuracy in posting of revenues and expenditures. The School Business Manager will communicate with Town Accountant if discrepancies are discovered. Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2024 Contact: Liz Latoria, School Business Manager

Condition: Final financial reports were not filed in a timely manner for a Special Education Cluster grant. Corrective Action Planned: The School Department appointed a new School Business Manager in the Spring of 2024. The newly appointed School Business Manager has begun the process of closing out the overdue grants. Amendments as required have been completed and are awaiting DESE approval. Once approved, the School Business Manager will file final financial reports for all overdue grants. Anticipated Completion Date: September 1, 2024 Contact: Liz Latoria, School Business Manager

Name of Auditee: Amsterdam Housing Authority Name of Audit Firm: EFPR Group, CPAs, PLLC Period Covered by the Audit: December 31, 2023 CAP Prepared by: Damaris Carbone, Executive Director Phone: (518) 842-2894 (A) Current Finding on the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs and Recommendations (1) Finding 2023-001 (a) Comments on the finding and recommendation - The Authority agrees with the finding. The Authority also agrees with the recommendation. Please see below for additional comments and action taken. (b) Action taken - The Authority will implement a comprehensive reporting calendar and tracking system, provide staff training on reporting requirements, establish an internal review and approval process for reports, conduct quarterly internal compliance audits, maintain regular communication with HUD, and continuously improve and document reporting processes with an annual review. These actions aim to ensure timely and accurate report submissions, thereby preventing future findings and maintaining eligibility for HUD funding. (c) Planned implementation date - The Authority plans to implement procedures during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 to resolve the reported finding.

CONDITION: During my review of the District’s compliance with the laws and regulations related to filing its federal grant program Final Expenditure Reports (FER), I noted that the School District did not file the Final Expenditure Report for the ESSER I grant program. The report was required to be filed with the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) no later than 90 days after the end date of the grant period (September 30, 2022), or within 30 days of expending all grant funding. CRITERIA: The Department of Education requires the completion and submission of a ‘Final Expenditure Report’ (FER) within 30 days of expending all grant funding. In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.344 of the Uniform Guidance requires the submission of financial reports no later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the grant period for performance. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District develop fiscal procedures to ensure that ‘Final Expenditure Reports’ for future fiscal years are completed and filed in a timely manner based on supporting financial information obtained from the District’s business office, in order to 1) comply with PDE reporting requirements for the District’s applicable federal programs, and 2) to avoid any future sanctions or withholding of grant monies from PDE as a result of not filing these reports in a timely manner. MANAGEMENT’S PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION: Management is currently implementing procedures to ensure the timely preparation and submission of all required federal financial report filings with the Department of Education, including but not limited to, the Final Expenditure Reports in compliance with PDE rules and regulations. The timeframe for implementation of these duties is effective immediately.

Research and Development – Assistance Listing No. Various Recommendation: We recommend the University review its current close out procedures and implement additional procedures to monitor the timeliness of federal account close outs. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Langston is strengthening the close-out process of federal awards to halt expenditures thus reducing redistributions and cost-transfers. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Mr. Robert Dixon, Director, Grants and Contracts Fiscal Administration at Oklahoma State University and Mr. Chris Kuwitzky, Vice President for Fiscal and Administrative Affairs. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 2024

2023-002 – Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance with Period of Performance Contact Name – Jeff Kaufman Position – Global Controller Contact – jkaufman@corusinternational.org Estimated date of completion: September 30, 2024 Corrective Action Plan – Corus management concurs with this finding and reaffirms its commitment to responsible stewardship of funding awarded to Corus by the United States Government and other donors. There are occasions when Corus may anticipate successfully negotiating a program extension with the USG or other donors. In the event there are immediate needs of the program’s potential beneficiaries, Corus may decide to utilize its own unrestricted funds in expectation that if the extension is obtained, these funds will be reimbursable under the terms of the extension. Corus recognizes that there is no guarantee that the program will be extended; thus, it understands that it incurs the expenses at its own risk. As a point of emphasis, while the expenses referenced in this finding were incorrectly coded such that this spending was erroneously included on the SEFA, Corus did not draw on USG funding to recover these expenses, the expenses were funded by Corus’ own unrestricted resources. Action steps to be implemented during the Corus 2024 fiscal year include: • The steps outlined in response to 2023-01 should also ensure proper account coding of expenses and timely monitoring of program spending against available obligated funds as well as program expiration dates.

MANAGEMENT’S PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION: Management has contracted with a third-party – J. Martin & Associates, LLC to perform certain of the District’s business office functions, as well as provide general oversight in all areas of the business office. One such function will be the timely preparation and submission of all required federal financial report filings with the Department of Education, including but not limited to, the Quarterly Cash on Hand Reconciliations and Final Expenditure Reports in compliance with PDE rules and regulations. The timeframe for implementation of these duties is effective immediately.

COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance – Assistance Listing Number 21.023 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority implements an internal control over compliance to evidence the expenses are approved to be charged to the grant. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: Monthly reports are provided for Cost Distribution by Deputy Director of Financial Operations to Deputy Director Programs for review of appropriate charging. Corrections are provided back to Finance and made in the financial system. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Ellen Eudy, Deputy Director, Financial Operations and Marni Holloway, Deputy Director, Programs Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2024

Special Education-Grants for Infants and Families– Assistance Listing No. 84.181 Recommendation: We recommend that the Department review its procedures to ensure that expenditures charged to the program are incurred within the grant's period of performance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Infants and Toddlers Supervisor will conduct monthly reviews of outstanding purchase orders in Oracle, addressing issues promptly with the Business Operation Officer/Financial Analyst. Professional development sessions will be attended to enhance invoice scrutiny for allowable expenses within the grant period. Quarterly reminders and Financial Quarterly Review meetings will be instituted for supervisors, ensuring timely action on outstanding purchase orders. Following will be implemented: 1. Infants and Toddler Supervisor will hold monthly meetings with the Financial Analyst and the secretarial staff to ensure consistent actions are taken when generating purchase orders and processing invoices. 2. The Infants and Toddler secretary will review invoice dates against contracts and purchase orders to ensure they fall within grant timelines before submitting them to the supervisor for signature. 3. Infants and Toddler Supervisor will confirm that purchases made with grant funds are allowable and within the designated grant period. The Supervisor will cross-reference invoice dates against grant periods before signing and sending to accounts payable. 4. The infants and Toddler Supervisor will confirm the work being invoiced has been completed and vendor details are checked, and dates verified. 5. Grant Accountants will provide transaction detail reports (at least quarterly). The Infant and Toddlers Coordinating Supervisor will review and sign-off on the quarterly transaction reports. 6. The Financial Analyst will meet monthly with the Infants and Toddler Supervisor and Coordinating Supervisor to ensure grant allowable expenses are adhered to and invoicing is updated and falls within grant-specific timelines. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Office of Infant and Toddlers/Coordinating Supervisor & Fiscal Analyst and Business Operation Office/Fiscal Analyst & Office of Infant and Toddlers/Coordinating Supervisor Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 2024

Special Education Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.027 & 84.173 Recommendation: We recommend that the Department review its procedures to ensure that expenditures charged to the program are incurred within the grant's period of performance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Infants and Toddlers Supervisor will conduct monthly reviews of outstanding purchase orders in Oracle, addressing issues promptly with the Business Operation Officer/Financial Analyst. Professional development sessions will be attended to enhance invoice scrutiny for allowable expenses within the grant period. Quarterly reminders and Financial Quarterly Review meetings will be instituted for supervisors, ensuring timely action on outstanding purchase orders. Following will be implemented: 1. Infants and Toddler Supervisor will hold monthly meetings with the Financial Analyst and the secretarial staff to ensure consistent actions are taken when generating purchase orders and processing invoices. 2. The Infants and Toddler secretary will review invoice dates against contracts and purchase orders to ensure they fall within grant timelines before submitting them to the supervisor for signature. 3. Infants and Toddler Supervisor will confirm that purchases made with grant funds are allowable and within the designated grant period. The Supervisor will cross-reference invoice dates against grant periods before signing and sending to accounts payable. 4. The infants and Toddler Supervisor will confirm the work being invoiced has been completed and vendor details are checked, and dates verified. 5. Grant Accountants will provide transaction detail reports (at least quarterly). The Infant and Toddlers Coordinating Supervisor will review and sign-off on the quarterly transaction reports. 6. The Financial Analyst will meet monthly with the Infants and Toddler Supervisor and Coordinating Supervisor to ensure grant allowable expenses are adhered to and invoicing is updated and falls within grant-specific timelines. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Office of Infant and Toddlers/Coordinating Supervisor & Fiscal Analyst and Business Operation Office/Fiscal Analyst & Office of Infant and Toddlers/Coordinating Supervisor Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 2024