Beginning January 31, 2024, DDAP started having internal discussions to determine the most effective and efficient methodology to evaluate the internal controls of the SCAs' data being reported to DDAP during the federal grant period and in the PPRs. Steps currently being taken by DDAP include updat...
Beginning January 31, 2024, DDAP started having internal discussions to determine the most effective and efficient methodology to evaluate the internal controls of the SCAs' data being reported to DDAP during the federal grant period and in the PPRs. Steps currently being taken by DDAP include updating the SCAs' monitoring process for the next annual monitoring cycle for FY 2023-24. The goal is to have a sound methodology with formalized policies and procedures in place by April 2024 to ensure the data collected is sampled for accuracy going forward.
To ensure accuracy of the information reported by the SCAs, which is included on the PPRs, DDAP will add verification of this data to the current SCA monitoring process. Specifically, the Project Officers who conduct SCA monitoring will:
- Add a question to the SCA Pre-Submission packet: ‘How does your SCA track SOR-funded clients in order to accurately report them on the SOR Report?’ The SCA must specifically state how they are accounting for these clients and how they arrive at the data reported to DDAP. If DDAP determines the process is not acceptable, the SCA will be required to revise and resubmit.
- During the virtual monitoring call, Project Officers will review the SCA’s written answer to the question, and ensure they have a full understanding of where the SCA keeps data on SOR-funded clients, and how they access this data to complete the SOR reports.
- During the onsite monitoring visit, the Project Officers will take the most recently submitted SOR report and ask the SCA staff to duplicate the steps they used to arrive at the reported numbers.
* If the SCA is able to demonstrate how clients are tracked and the steps used to determine the reported numbers produce results consistent with what was submitted in the report, the SCA’s submitted data will be considered verified.
* If the SCA is unable to demonstrate how clients are tracked, and the steps used to determine the reported numbers do not produce results consistent with what was submitted in the report, the SCA will be required to implement a process by which they can accurately track this data and report client numbers. Any SCA required to implement a new client-tracking system will be required to submit backup documentation with their SOR reports, until such time as they are able to demonstrate to DDAP that they are accurately tracking clients and can demonstrate the steps used to determine their reported numbers.
- This review process and results will be added to the Monitoring Report sent to the SCA at the end of the monitoring cycle, to reflect the SCA’s compliance status.
Anticipated Completion Date: 09/30/2024
Contact Names: Susan Duff, Chief, Program Monitoring Division; Autumn Croasmun, Project Director for State Opioid Response III Grant; Tia Roebuck, Director, Division of Budget and Procurement