Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Late Return of Title IV (R2T4) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063, 84.007, 84.268, and 84.379
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not properly assess R2T4s under the modular withdrawal regulations that went into effect July 1, 2021. The University had an incorrect assumption of the 49% exemption for zero credit students in modular programs.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $2,954
Context: Out of 25 students who withdrew during the audit period, 2 students in modular programs did not have an R2T4 calculated and unearned funds returned timely. $2,954 in Federal Direct Loans were returned as part of the audit process. The University completed additional review of their students in modular programs who withdrew officially or unofficially and no other late returns were identified.
Cause: Complexity of modular withdraw regulations. University originally assessed the students as having met an exemption when the exemption did not apply.
Effect: Unearned Title IV funds not returned timely.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: 2022-001
Recommendation: We recommend that the financial aid office continues to attend compliance training on the modular regulations and consult with Department of Education on the implementation of new regulations where necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Late Return of Title IV (R2T4) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063, 84.007, 84.268, and 84.379
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not properly assess R2T4s under the modular withdrawal regulations that went into effect July 1, 2021. The University had an incorrect assumption of the 49% exemption for zero credit students in modular programs.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $2,954
Context: Out of 25 students who withdrew during the audit period, 2 students in modular programs did not have an R2T4 calculated and unearned funds returned timely. $2,954 in Federal Direct Loans were returned as part of the audit process. The University completed additional review of their students in modular programs who withdrew officially or unofficially and no other late returns were identified.
Cause: Complexity of modular withdraw regulations. University originally assessed the students as having met an exemption when the exemption did not apply.
Effect: Unearned Title IV funds not returned timely.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: 2022-001
Recommendation: We recommend that the financial aid office continues to attend compliance training on the modular regulations and consult with Department of Education on the implementation of new regulations where necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Late Return of Title IV (R2T4) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063, 84.007, 84.268, and 84.379
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not properly assess R2T4s under the modular withdrawal regulations that went into effect July 1, 2021. The University had an incorrect assumption of the 49% exemption for zero credit students in modular programs.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $2,954
Context: Out of 25 students who withdrew during the audit period, 2 students in modular programs did not have an R2T4 calculated and unearned funds returned timely. $2,954 in Federal Direct Loans were returned as part of the audit process. The University completed additional review of their students in modular programs who withdrew officially or unofficially and no other late returns were identified.
Cause: Complexity of modular withdraw regulations. University originally assessed the students as having met an exemption when the exemption did not apply.
Effect: Unearned Title IV funds not returned timely.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: 2022-001
Recommendation: We recommend that the financial aid office continues to attend compliance training on the modular regulations and consult with Department of Education on the implementation of new regulations where necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Late Return of Title IV (R2T4) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063, 84.007, 84.268, and 84.379
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not properly assess R2T4s under the modular withdrawal regulations that went into effect July 1, 2021. The University had an incorrect assumption of the 49% exemption for zero credit students in modular programs.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $2,954
Context: Out of 25 students who withdrew during the audit period, 2 students in modular programs did not have an R2T4 calculated and unearned funds returned timely. $2,954 in Federal Direct Loans were returned as part of the audit process. The University completed additional review of their students in modular programs who withdrew officially or unofficially and no other late returns were identified.
Cause: Complexity of modular withdraw regulations. University originally assessed the students as having met an exemption when the exemption did not apply.
Effect: Unearned Title IV funds not returned timely.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: 2022-001
Recommendation: We recommend that the financial aid office continues to attend compliance training on the modular regulations and consult with Department of Education on the implementation of new regulations where necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 84.379 (Student Financial Assistance Cluster)
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $-0-
Context: The University has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, implemented multi-factor authentication on all systems containing personally identifiable information (PII), or implemented a continuous monitoring solution, such as once a year penetration testing and twice a year vulnerability scanning. Additionally, the University has not implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The University has not allocated sufficient resources to address and document compliance with the requirements of GLBA.
Effect: The University has not adequately addressed the requirements of GLBA, which may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the University allocate sufficient resources to address all requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Late Return of Title IV (R2T4) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063, 84.007, 84.268, and 84.379
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not properly assess R2T4s under the modular withdrawal regulations that went into effect July 1, 2021. The University had an incorrect assumption of the 49% exemption for zero credit students in modular programs.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $2,954
Context: Out of 25 students who withdrew during the audit period, 2 students in modular programs did not have an R2T4 calculated and unearned funds returned timely. $2,954 in Federal Direct Loans were returned as part of the audit process. The University completed additional review of their students in modular programs who withdrew officially or unofficially and no other late returns were identified.
Cause: Complexity of modular withdraw regulations. University originally assessed the students as having met an exemption when the exemption did not apply.
Effect: Unearned Title IV funds not returned timely.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: 2022-001
Recommendation: We recommend that the financial aid office continues to attend compliance training on the modular regulations and consult with Department of Education on the implementation of new regulations where necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Late Return of Title IV (R2T4) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063, 84.007, 84.268, and 84.379
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not properly assess R2T4s under the modular withdrawal regulations that went into effect July 1, 2021. The University had an incorrect assumption of the 49% exemption for zero credit students in modular programs.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $2,954
Context: Out of 25 students who withdrew during the audit period, 2 students in modular programs did not have an R2T4 calculated and unearned funds returned timely. $2,954 in Federal Direct Loans were returned as part of the audit process. The University completed additional review of their students in modular programs who withdrew officially or unofficially and no other late returns were identified.
Cause: Complexity of modular withdraw regulations. University originally assessed the students as having met an exemption when the exemption did not apply.
Effect: Unearned Title IV funds not returned timely.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: 2022-001
Recommendation: We recommend that the financial aid office continues to attend compliance training on the modular regulations and consult with Department of Education on the implementation of new regulations where necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Late Return of Title IV (R2T4) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063, 84.007, 84.268, and 84.379
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not properly assess R2T4s under the modular withdrawal regulations that went into effect July 1, 2021. The University had an incorrect assumption of the 49% exemption for zero credit students in modular programs.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $2,954
Context: Out of 25 students who withdrew during the audit period, 2 students in modular programs did not have an R2T4 calculated and unearned funds returned timely. $2,954 in Federal Direct Loans were returned as part of the audit process. The University completed additional review of their students in modular programs who withdrew officially or unofficially and no other late returns were identified.
Cause: Complexity of modular withdraw regulations. University originally assessed the students as having met an exemption when the exemption did not apply.
Effect: Unearned Title IV funds not returned timely.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: 2022-001
Recommendation: We recommend that the financial aid office continues to attend compliance training on the modular regulations and consult with Department of Education on the implementation of new regulations where necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Late Return of Title IV (R2T4) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063, 84.007, 84.268, and 84.379
Federal Award Identification #: 2022-23 Financial Aid Year
Condition: The University did not properly assess R2T4s under the modular withdrawal regulations that went into effect July 1, 2021. The University had an incorrect assumption of the 49% exemption for zero credit students in modular programs.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $2,954
Context: Out of 25 students who withdrew during the audit period, 2 students in modular programs did not have an R2T4 calculated and unearned funds returned timely. $2,954 in Federal Direct Loans were returned as part of the audit process. The University completed additional review of their students in modular programs who withdrew officially or unofficially and no other late returns were identified.
Cause: Complexity of modular withdraw regulations. University originally assessed the students as having met an exemption when the exemption did not apply.
Effect: Unearned Title IV funds not returned timely.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: 2022-001
Recommendation: We recommend that the financial aid office continues to attend compliance training on the modular regulations and consult with Department of Education on the implementation of new regulations where necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.