Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
59,889
In database
Filtered Results
12,974
Matching current filters
Showing Page
12 of 519
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Comment #2025-001 COMPENSATION METHODOLOGY SHOULD BE REVIEWED FOR INCENTIVE PAYMENTS COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT AND LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FAL #93.569 and 93.568 Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the recommendation. FACAA up...
Comment #2025-001 COMPENSATION METHODOLOGY SHOULD BE REVIEWED FOR INCENTIVE PAYMENTS COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT AND LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FAL #93.569 and 93.568 Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the recommendation. FACAA updated its Incentive Compensation Policy, which was approved by the Board of Directors, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430 and 2 CFR 200.303. The policy establishes the methodology for incentive payments, and all incentive payments have been documented and supported by appropriate records to ensure compliance with applicable federal requirements. Implementation Date: Effective immediately, our policies have been enhanced to clarify and support our methodology used during the periods noted under review, and for all subsequent periods. Responsible Person(s): Dr. Howard Grant, President/CEO
Program:HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) Finding:2025-001 Contact Person:April Apodaca Administrative & Financial Services Bureau Manager Community Development Department Phone: (562) 570-6611 Email: April.Apodaca@longbeach.gov Planned Actions: The City has exercised its rights to enforce...
Program:HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) Finding:2025-001 Contact Person:April Apodaca Administrative & Financial Services Bureau Manager Community Development Department Phone: (562) 570-6611 Email: April.Apodaca@longbeach.gov Planned Actions: The City has exercised its rights to enforce compliance with the terms of its contractual arrangement for this standalone developer/owner, which has resulted in the highest levels of legal action. Through its established monitoring and review procedures, City staff identified documents submitted by the developer that appeared to be inaccurate or falsified. This discovery prompted a multi-year investigation and subsequent litigation, undertaken in direct collaboration and response to instructions as directed by HUD. Throughout this period, the City’s investigative and litigation activities have not been historically viewed as compliance concerns, particularly given their necessity in preserving the integrity of the legal process. At every stage, the City has acted consistently with HUD’s directives and the requirements of the applicable contractual framework. During the multi‑year investigation, HUD expressly instructed the City to continue normal program operations to avoid alerting the developer and to maintain the integrity of the ongoing inquiry. The City respectfully asserts that the audit finding is inconsistent with HUD’s guidance and the historical practices necessary to ensure effective enforcement. Since the initial identification of the finding, the City has taken all reasonable corrective actions within its authority to address the issue and mitigate associated risks. These actions include following established monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with HOME program requirements, making repeated documented requests for tenant eligibility records from the developer/owner, and escalating efforts through the City Attorney. This issue is isolated to one developer/owner and sampling for other developers/owners has not identified similar concerns. The City has been transparent about the ongoing litigation involving the standalone developer/owner responsible for maintaining the records and remains committed in resolving this matter and in pursuing additional actions available once the legal proceedings have been concluded.
Finding 2025-002 - Untimely Submission of the Single Audit Reporting Package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse Noncompliance | Repeat Finding | Entity-Wide Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes - repeat of Finding 2024-004; fourth consecutive year Responsible Official(s): Juan E. Rodriguez, Ex...
Finding 2025-002 - Untimely Submission of the Single Audit Reporting Package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse Noncompliance | Repeat Finding | Entity-Wide Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes - repeat of Finding 2024-004; fourth consecutive year Responsible Official(s): Juan E. Rodriguez, Executive Director (primary); Josafat Saldivar, Finance Director Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2027 (for the fiscal year 2026 single audit cycle) Management Response: STDC concurs with the finding. The fiscal year 2024 single audit reporting package was submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse after the nine-month regulatory deadline, marking the fourth consecutive year of late submission. STDC understands that timely submission is essential to maintaining compliance and to supporting removal of its high-risk auditee designation. Corrective Action to Be Taken: STDC will adopt a board-approved audit readiness calendar under which year-end records are closed and reconciled within 90 days of fiscal year end, the auditor is engaged by December, and complete supporting documentation is delivered to the auditor by February. STDC will target Federal Audit Clearinghouse submission by April of each year, well ahead of the nine-month deadline. For the fiscal year 2025 audit, STDC has worked to complete the engagement on an accelerated schedule with a target submission on or before the June 30, 2026 deadline. Achieving timely submission for the fiscal year 2025 cycle and maintaining it thereafter is expected to support removal of the high-risk auditee designation in a future audit cycle.
The Institute's procurement policy will be updated to the passage of Act 202 1-296, now codified at Code ofAlabama 1975, Section 41-4-110, et seq.
The Institute's procurement policy will be updated to the passage of Act 202 1-296, now codified at Code ofAlabama 1975, Section 41-4-110, et seq.
Federal Agency Name: Department of Agriculture Program Name: Community Facilities Loans and Grants Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 10.766 Finding Summary: As a part of the audit process, a reclassification entry was made to move an additional 12 months of reserve funds from the cash swe...
Federal Agency Name: Department of Agriculture Program Name: Community Facilities Loans and Grants Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 10.766 Finding Summary: As a part of the audit process, a reclassification entry was made to move an additional 12 months of reserve funds from the cash sweep general fund to a separate bookkeeping account. The Hospital had excess cash available to cover the required reserve amount for the fiscal year. Responsible Individuals: Renae Karst, Chief Financial Officer Corrective Action Plan: Management will fund the reserve account from the cash sweep general fund and will monitor the separate bookkeeping account throughout the year to ensure the reserve is properly funded throughout the year as required by the loan documents. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026
Finding 2025-001- Material Weakness related to Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense, Department of Justice, National Science Foundation, Department ...
Finding 2025-001- Material Weakness related to Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense, Department of Justice, National Science Foundation, Department of Agriculture, US Agency for International Development Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Planned corrective action: The Medical Center has updated the reporting logic of the vendor report submitted to the third-party service provider for suspension and debarment evaluation. The Medical Center has also implemented an internal control where a member of Research Finance management will review the vendor report for accuracy and completeness and sign-off prior to submitting to the third-party service provider for suspension and debarment evaluation. Name of responsible official: Michael Brennan Director, Research Finance Michael.Brennan@childrens.harvard.edu Anticipated completion date: May 11, 2026
Written Policies Required by the Uniform Guidance Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to: 1) Payments (draws o...
Written Policies Required by the Uniform Guidance Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to: 1) Payments (draws of federal funds and how to minimize the time lapsing between the receipt of federal funds and the disbursement to contractors/employees/subrecipients) (§200.302(6)); 2) Allowability of costs charged to federal programs (§200.302(7)); and 3) Compensation (personnel and benefits policy) (§200.430 and §200.431). Although the Township has processes in place to cover these areas, there are no formal written policies covering payments, allowability of costs, and compensation. As a result of this condition, the Township did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance applicable to the above noted grants. Auditor Recommendation: We are aware that the Township is evaluating options using internal and external resources to take corrective action. We recommend that the Township proceed with its selected option as soon as practical, but no later than the end of the next fiscal year. Corrective Action: As noted in the auditor recommendation, the Township is in the process of evaluating a draft grant administration policy, which will address items #1 and #2 (payments and allowability of costs charged to federal programs). Item #3 (compensation) will be addressed via review and modification as needed of the Township’s personnel manual to ensure compliance. Responsible Persons: Karen Trombley, Accounting Coordinator; Sarah Mistretta, Human Resources Director Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2026
Written Policies Required by the Unfiform Grant Guidance Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to: 1) Payments (...
Written Policies Required by the Unfiform Grant Guidance Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to: 1) Payments (draws of federal funds and how to minimize the time lapsing between the receipt of federal funds and the disbursement to contractors/employees/subrecipients) (§200.302(6)); 2) Allowability of costs charged to federal programs (§200.302(7)); and 3) Compensation (personnel and benefits policy) (§200.430 and §200.431). Although the County has processes in place to cover these areas, there are no formal written policies covering payments, allowability of costs, and compensation. As a result of this condition, the County did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance applicable to the above noted grants. Auditor Recommendation: We are aware that the County is evaluating options using internal and external resources to take corrective action. We recommend that the County proceed with its selected option as soon as practical, but no later than the end of the next fiscal year. Corrective Action: The County will proceed with its selected option no later than the end of the next fiscal year. Responsible Person: Susan Maier, Director of Fiscal Services Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2026
Finding Number: 2025-001 Finding Title: Procurement Controls (Significant Deficiency) Name of Contact Person: Janice Clark, Chief Finance & Operations Officer Corrective actions implemented or in process include the following: 1. Enhanced Procurement Oversight and Centralized Review The Organization...
Finding Number: 2025-001 Finding Title: Procurement Controls (Significant Deficiency) Name of Contact Person: Janice Clark, Chief Finance & Operations Officer Corrective actions implemented or in process include the following: 1. Enhanced Procurement Oversight and Centralized Review The Organization, building on its established procurement policies, implemented stricter headquarters oversight and approval requirements for higher-risk and higher-dollar procurements, including defined approval thresholds for procurement solicitations, evaluation activities, and contract execution. Specialized and international procurements now require additional senior-level review and involvement, regardless of value. 2. Strengthened Vendor Due Diligence and Market Research Procedures The Organization updated procurement procedures to require expanded documentation of vendor due diligence and market research activities, including enhanced validation of vendor qualifications, procurement support documentation, and vendor representations associated with federal procurements. 3. Enhanced Monitoring of Procurement Documentation and Compliance Requirements Management implemented strengthened review procedures over procurement advertisements, vendor certifications, geographic code compliance documentation, and other supporting procurement records. The revised procedures also require additional review and escalation for identified procurement irregularities or inconsistencies. 4. Advance Payment and Approval Controls The Organization implemented revised controls governing advance payments, including enhanced approval requirements for significant prepayments and additional supporting documentation requirements for high-risk payment arrangements. 5. Procurement Evaluation and Technical Assistance The Organization enhanced procurement evaluation oversight by requiring additional Headquarters participation in evaluation activities for procurements exceeding defined thresholds. In addition, the Organization engaged specialized procurement and logistics resources to provide technical assistance and support for international procurement activities. 6. Personnel Actions and Training The Organization took personnel actions in response to the investigation findings and implemented enhanced procurement and compliance training for relevant personnel involved in procurement and grants management activities. Management believes these corrective actions appropriately address the control deficiencies identified in the finding and strengthen the Organization’s internal control over compliance related to procurement activities under federally funded programs. Anticipated Completion Date: Substantially completed as of April 6, 2026, with ongoing monitoring and training activities continuing through fiscal year 2026.
PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION The Division will contact each unit distributing TEFAP assistance to reinforce the requirement to retain documentation regarding the determination of client eligibility and will review and strengthen existing policies and procedures related to form completion and retention....
PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION The Division will contact each unit distributing TEFAP assistance to reinforce the requirement to retain documentation regarding the determination of client eligibility and will review and strengthen existing policies and procedures related to form completion and retention. The Division's Social Services department will implement a quarterly internal review process to provide increased oversight and monitoring across all distributing units. ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE 10/1/26 RESPONSIBLE CONTACT PERSON Julie Luft, NW Social Services Director
Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommended the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee...
Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommended the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization continues to make improvements to processes and procedures to ensure the accurate documentation and application of sliding fee discounts. If the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has questions regarding this plan, please call Matt Morrill, CFO, at 970-871-7635.
Almost Home, Inc. has formalized this through our required client file checklist and related policy. The policy was in place and was applied improperly. Staff members who failed to apply the policy were given corrective action at the time. Our quality/compliance control processes did not catch this ...
Almost Home, Inc. has formalized this through our required client file checklist and related policy. The policy was in place and was applied improperly. Staff members who failed to apply the policy were given corrective action at the time. Our quality/compliance control processes did not catch this mistake in time, and our management corrective action plan will include improvements on the quality/compliance control to ensure that all necessary documentation is maintained. Also necessary to note is the fact that Almost Home, Inc. will no longer receive TANF funding as of December 31, 2025.
Action taken in response to finding: The Commission is in the process of adopting an updated procurement and conflict of interest policy to comply with compliance requirements.
Action taken in response to finding: The Commission is in the process of adopting an updated procurement and conflict of interest policy to comply with compliance requirements.
ALEA performed the monitoring required by 2 CFR 200.332(e) for the subrecipients reviewed and does not believe corrective action is warranted. As part of its ongoing subrecipient monitoring operations, ALEA performs the following activities: 1. ALEA documents a risk assessment for each active subrec...
ALEA performed the monitoring required by 2 CFR 200.332(e) for the subrecipients reviewed and does not believe corrective action is warranted. As part of its ongoing subrecipient monitoring operations, ALEA performs the following activities: 1. ALEA documents a risk assessment for each active subrecipient using a standardized risk assessment tool that produces an individual, supportable risk determination for each subrecipient and updates the assessment when conditions warrant, consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(c). 2. ALEA maintains a centralized monitoring schedule and tracking log that assigns monitoring activities to each subrecipient based on its risk determination and records the status, date, and results of each activity. 3. ALEA performs and documents the monitoring activities required under 2 CFR 200.332(e) and applies the risk-based monitoring tools described in 2 CFR 200.332(1) to subrecipients based on assessed risk, retaining supporting documentation in its grants management system and in each subrecipient file. 4. ALEA verifies that each subrecipient required to obtain a Single Audit under Subpart F of 2 CFR Part 200 is audited as required and reviews the results of each applicable audit, consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(g). 5. ALEA issues written management decisions on any audit findings pertaining to its subawards within six months of acceptance of the applicable audit report and resolves findings specifically related to the subaward, consistent with 2 CFR 200.332(e)(3) and (e)(4) and 2 CFR 200.521. 6. ALEA provides training to staff responsible for subrecipient monitoring and continues that training on an ongoing basis. ALEA continues to monitor its subrecipients and to maintain documentation of the monitoring activities performed under 2 CFR 200.332(e).
The Alabama Department of Public Health will ensure all expenditures are adequately documented, based on true and accurate invoices, and allowable under the federal award. • The Immunization Division continues to reorganize with the new leadership team. Staff reviews grant guidance semi-annually, or...
The Alabama Department of Public Health will ensure all expenditures are adequately documented, based on true and accurate invoices, and allowable under the federal award. • The Immunization Division continues to reorganize with the new leadership team. Staff reviews grant guidance semi-annually, or when updated, with program grant monitoring staff to ensure compliance. • Invoices and supporting documentation are being reviewed for source documents against grant guidance by program staff and approved by Operations Manager or Division Director to ensure costs to the grant are reasonable, allowable, allocable, and consistently applied before forwarding to Finance. • Grant monitoring staff use the Risk Assessment and Subrecipient monitoring policy to ensure that all reimbursements of expenses are adequately documented, based on true and accurate invoices, and costs are allowable under the federal award. • ADPH Bureau of Financial Services has developed and required the use of a Subrecipient Field Voucher form to include certification statement referencing 2 CFR200 in regard to invoices, along with conducting ffirther reviews of invoices before uploading into STAARS for payment. • All program grant staff have access to attend all available Finance and Grant training courses. • ADPH Bureau of Financial Services has created a Grant Management Centralized Guidance Repository in the ADPH Document Library for access by all ADPH staff • ADPH Bureau of Financial Services is developing an ADPH Grant Manual. • ADPH Bureau of Financial Services will develop policies and procedures related to media usage, college awareness campaigns, and sponsorships to ensure adequate documentation is available to verify the allowability of the expenditures in relation to various programs.
The Alabama Emergency Management Agency (AEMA) will strengthen its subrecipient monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with the audit requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.501. AEMA will implement formal written procedures requiring the identification of subrecipients subject to Single Audit requir...
The Alabama Emergency Management Agency (AEMA) will strengthen its subrecipient monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with the audit requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.501. AEMA will implement formal written procedures requiring the identification of subrecipients subject to Single Audit requirements and the timely collection, review, and retention of applicable audit reports. AEMA will establish a centralized tracking system to monitor the receipt of required audit reports and identify subrecipients that have not submitted audits by the required due date. Designated personnel will be responsible for conducting and documenting reviews of all received audit reports to determine whether any findings, questioned costs, or deficiencies impact federally funded programs administered by AEMA. In instances where audit findings are identified, AEMA will follow up with subrecipients to obtain corrective action plans and monitor the implementation of corrective actions to ensure identified deficiencies are adequately addressed. Management will also implement periodic supervisory reviews to verify that audit reports are obtained, reviewed, and documented in accordance with federal requirements.
The Alabama Emergency Management Agency (AEMA) will develop and implement formal written procedures to ensure compliance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting requirements. These procedures will include processes for identifying all first-tier subawards subje...
The Alabama Emergency Management Agency (AEMA) will develop and implement formal written procedures to ensure compliance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting requirements. These procedures will include processes for identifying all first-tier subawards subject to FFATA reporting, verifying the accuracy and completeness of required subaward data elements, and ensuring timely reporting of applicable subawards and subaward amendments to SAM.gov within the required reporting deadlines. AEMA will establish a tracking mechanism to monitor all subawards of $30,000 or more and will assign responsibility to designated personnel for reviewing and submitting FFATA reports. Additionally, management will implement a supervisory review process to verify that all required reports have been submitted accurately and timely.
Finding 1218974 (2025-101)
Material Weakness 2025
PAYROLL CONTROLS Criteria: In accordance with the documentation standards of 2 CFR section 200.430(a), costs of compensation for personal services are allowable to the extent the total compensation for individual employees is reasonable for the services rendered, conforms to the established written ...
PAYROLL CONTROLS Criteria: In accordance with the documentation standards of 2 CFR section 200.430(a), costs of compensation for personal services are allowable to the extent the total compensation for individual employees is reasonable for the services rendered, conforms to the established written policy of the recipient or subrecipient and is determined and supported as provided in 2 CFR section 200.430(g), which states that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: Payroll testing was completed for a sample of 40 individuals for which time and expenses were charged to R&D grants. Within that selection, we noted instances where payroll controls did not function properly in regard to percentage of time allocated to a grant, proper pay code inclusion, fringe benefit calculation and timely and supervisor level review of time sheets. Context: Management was able to isolate the time allocation error to 20 employees for which the time and costs charges to the grants were in excess of actual time allocation. This resulted in $87,831.53 in excess charged to the grants. Additional control deficiencies did not result in significant improper grant expenditures. Cause: A new payroll system was implemented in fiscal 2025. Grant allocation percentages were not accurately established in the payroll system upon conversion. Effect: Time charged to grant efforts by certain individuals exceeded actual time worked. Recommendation: Review controls should be enhanced to ensure grant expenditures accurately reflect payroll costs. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: Management identified the issue early following implementation of the new payroll system and performed a detailed review to isolate the impacted population. Corrections were made to payroll allocations for the affected employees, and reimbursement adjustments were processed as appropriate. To prevent recurrence, management has implemented the following control enhancements: - Standardized procedures for establishing and validating grant allocation percentages within the payroll system; - Enhanced supervisory review requirements for time reporting and payroll approvals; - Periodic monitoring and reconciliation of payroll charges to grant budgets; - Additional training for payroll and grant accounting personnel on system configuration and compliance requirements. Responsible Parties: VP of Accounting and Controller and VP of Audit & Compliance. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed in fiscal year 2025; ongoing monitoring procedures are in place.
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-005 and agrees that the deficiency in accounting for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement constitutes a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Misclassification of individual expense ca...
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-005 and agrees that the deficiency in accounting for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement constitutes a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Misclassification of individual expense categories by $70,223 affected the accuracy of category-level reporting and increased the risk of budget overages or noncompliance where federal awards and resource sharing agreements contain line-item spending limitations or require accurate reporting by cost category. Although the error did not necessarily affect total expenditures, incorrect classification can impair oversight, distort budget-to-actual monitoring, and reduce the reliability of information used for internal and external reporting. Management determined that the root causes included insufficiently detailed written guidance for coding transactions under the resource sharing agreement, inconsistent use of account mappings between the general ledger and agreement budget categories, and inadequate review of category-level coding before expenditures were finalized and reported. Existing procedures addressed expense processing generally, but they did not provide enough direction on how shared-service or agreement-covered costs should be classified into the proper expense categories for budget monitoring and reporting. To address this material weakness, management is implementing a corrective action plan focused on improving category-level classification and reporting for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement. The plan includes four key actions: revising written accounting procedures to define category descriptions, coding rules, and decision standards; creating a standardized crosswalk between general ledger accounts and agreement budget categories; requiring supervisory review of category coding before final reporting; and implementing periodic budget-to-actual monitoring to identify unusual balances, potential overages, and coding trends that may indicate misclassification. Under the revised process, each expense charged under the resource sharing agreement will be recorded using the approved chart-of-accounts mapping and supported by documentation sufficient to identify the nature of the cost, the applicable budget category, and the reason the selected classification is appropriate. If a transaction involves a cost type that does not clearly align to an established category, accounting personnel will be required to elevate the transaction for review before posting or reporting. Any manual reclassification entries affecting agreement categories will require documented justification and supervisory approval. In addition, management will compare recorded expenditures to budgeted amounts by category on a recurring basis so that unusual fluctuations, coding anomalies, or category overages can be investigated and corrected before financial or grant reporting is finalized. Management will also provide targeted training to accounting, finance, and grants personnel responsible for recording or reviewing resource sharing agreement activity. Training will address the relationship between GAAP-based accounting records, agreement-specific budget categories, and federal compliance expectations for accurate, current, and complete financial reporting and comparison of expenditures to budget amounts. Management will supplement this training with periodic reviews of classification trends and exception items so that recurring coding issues can be identified and corrected through additional guidance, process changes, or retraining as needed. Management believes these corrective actions directly address the auditors’ recommendation to review current policies and procedures for compliance with GAAP and federal regulations. Responsibility for implementation will rest primarily with the Finance Director, in coordination with accounting and grants personnel involved in resource sharing agreement reporting. Management expects the enhanced coding guidance, account crosswalk, review controls, and category-level monitoring procedures to improve the accuracy of expense classification, strengthen budget oversight, and reduce the risk of misstatements or noncompliance related to resource sharing agreement expenditures in future periods. Corrective Action Plan Summary Corrective Action Responsible Staff/Role Target Completion Date Evidence of Completion Revise and adopt written accounting procedures for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement, including category definitions, coding rules, and documentation standards for classification decisions. Finance Director; Accounting Manager June 30, 2026 Approved procedures; updated accounting manual; staff distribution records. Develop and implement a standardized crosswalk between general ledger accounts and resource sharing agreement budget categories, including guidance for common transaction types and reclassification scenarios. Accounting Manager; Finance Director July 15, 2026 Approved account crosswalk; coding reference guide; sample mapped transactions. Require documented supervisory review of category coding for resource sharing agreement transactions before final reporting, including review of manual reclasses and higher-risk expense categories. Finance Director Effective immediately Reviewer signoff on category reports; approved reclassification support; supervisory review documentation. Provide targeted training to accounting, finance, and grants personnel on category-level expense classification, use of the crosswalk, and reporting requirements under the resource sharing agreement Compliance Officer; Finance Director August 31, 2026 Training materials; attendance logs; completed acknowledgements or knowledge checks. and applicable federal regulations. Perform monthly budget-to-actual category reviews for resource sharing agreement expenditures to identify unusual balances, potential overages, and coding anomalies requiring investigation or correction. Accounting Manager; Finance Director Monthly, beginning July 31, 2026 Monthly budget-to-actual reports; exception logs; documented follow-up and corrections. Perform quarterly monitoring of a sample of resource sharing agreement transactions to verify correct category coding, consistency with the approved crosswalk, and compliance with agreement and federal reporting requirements. Compliance Officer; Finance Director Quarterly, beginning September 30, 2026 Quarterly monitoring reports; sample testing documentation; corrective action follow-up records
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-003 and agrees that the control deficiency related to allocation of expenses within the WIOA Cluster constitutes a material weakness in internal control over compliance. This finding is distinct from Finding 2025-002 because it concerns the m...
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-003 and agrees that the control deficiency related to allocation of expenses within the WIOA Cluster constitutes a material weakness in internal control over compliance. This finding is distinct from Finding 2025-002 because it concerns the methodology, approval, and monitoring of cost allocations affecting WIOA programs, including restrictions applicable to the Youth program, rather than the allowability of costs based on timing or period of performance. Although the identified costs were corrected, the deficiency increased the risk that shared or allocable costs could be assigned to restricted programs in a manner inconsistent with federal requirements if not detected and prevented in a timely manner. Management determined that the root causes were insufficiently detailed written procedures for allocating shared costs within the WIOA Cluster, lack of explicit documentation addressing the prohibition on transfers to or from the Youth program under 20 CFR 683.130, and inconsistent supervisory review of allocation entries before posting. Existing practices addressed cost charging generally, but they did not provide enough direction on how shared expenditures benefiting multiple WIOA funding streams should be allocated, documented, reviewed, and restricted when Youth funds were involved. To address this material weakness, management is implementing four control improvements. First, it will formalize written cost allocation policies and procedures for the WIOA Cluster that define approved methodologies, documentation standards, proportional benefit requirements, and restrictions applicable to the Youth program. Second, it will require documented supervisory review and approval of all allocation entries affecting WIOA programs before posting to the general ledger. Third, it will provide targeted training to finance, grants, and program management personnel on WIOA-specific allocation requirements, with particular emphasis on Youth program restrictions. Fourth, it will implement periodic monitoring to verify that allocations follow the approved methodology and remain consistent with federal requirements. Under the revised process, each allocation affecting WIOA programs will be supported by contemporaneous documentation identifying the nature of the cost, the programs benefiting from the expenditure, the basis used to distribute the cost, and the calculation of the amounts charged to each program. When a cost benefits multiple programs and proportional benefit can be reasonably determined, the allocation will be based on that proportional benefit. When proportional benefit cannot be determined precisely, the allocation will be supported by a reasonable documented method that is applied consistently. Allocation support must also include a compliance checkpoint confirming that no allocation results in an impermissible transfer to or from the Youth program. No allocation entry affecting WIOA programs will be recorded without documented preparer support and written supervisory review evidencing compliance with internal policy and applicable regulations. Management will also establish recurring monitoring controls to test allocations recorded during the year. On at least a quarterly basis, the Finance Director or designee will review a sample of WIOA allocation entries to confirm that the approved methodology was followed, supporting documentation was retained, supervisory approval was completed, and Youth program restrictions were observed. Exceptions identified through this monitoring process will be documented, investigated, and corrected promptly, with any necessary retraining or policy revisions implemented to prevent recurrence. Results of the monitoring process will be communicated to senior management as part of ongoing oversight of federal awards compliance. Management believes these corrective actions directly address the auditors’ recommendations and strengthen controls over allocation of expenses within the WIOA Cluster without duplicating the corrective actions described in Finding 2025-002. Responsibility for implementation will rest primarily with the Finance Director, in coordination with grants and program leadership. Management expects the enhanced policy framework, approval requirements, training, and monitoring activities to reduce the risk of noncompliant allocations, improve documentation of shared cost methodologies, and support sustained compliance with 2 CFR 200.405 and 20 CFR 683.130. Corrective Action Plan Summary Corrective Action Responsible Staff/Role Target Completion Date Evidence of Completion Revise and adopt written WIOA cost allocation policies and procedures that define approved allocation methodologies, documentation requirements, proportional benefit standards, and explicit restrictions applicable to the Youth program. Finance Director; Grants Manager June 30, 2026 Approved policy and procedure document; distribution to applicable staff; retained version history. Implement a standardized allocation worksheet and review checklist for all shared costs charged to WIOA programs, including a compliance checkpoint for Youth program restrictions. Accounting Manager; Finance Director July 15, 2026 Standard allocation template; completed review checklist; sample completed allocation packages. Require documented supervisory review and approval of all allocation entries affecting WIOA programs before posting to the general ledger. Finance Director Effective immediately Signed allocation entries; reviewer signoff; journal entry support retained with monthly close documentation. Provide targeted training to finance, grants, and program personnel on 2 CFR 200.405, WIOA allocation principles, and the prohibition on transfers to or Finance Director; Compliance Officer August 31, 2026 Training materials; attendance logs; completed acknowledgements or assessments. from the Youth program under 20 CFR 683.130. Perform quarterly monitoring of a sample of WIOA allocation entries to verify adherence to the approved methodology, adequacy of support, supervisory approval, and compliance with Youth program restrictions. Finance Director; Compliance Officer Quarterly, beginning September 30, 2026 Quarterly monitoring reports; exception logs; documented corrective follow-up. Evaluate the effectiveness of the revised allocation controls and update policies, training, or monitoring procedures if deficiencies or exceptions are identified. Finance Director; Executive Leadership Semi-annually during fiscal year 2027 Management review memoranda; updated procedures; remediation tracking documentation.
Finding: 2025-002 Reportable finding considered a material weakness-Expenses incurred outside of the period of performance Effect: The organization claimed and was reimbursed for unallowable costs under 2 CFR 200.458. Failure to maintain effective controls over cost allowability increases the risk o...
Finding: 2025-002 Reportable finding considered a material weakness-Expenses incurred outside of the period of performance Effect: The organization claimed and was reimbursed for unallowable costs under 2 CFR 200.458. Failure to maintain effective controls over cost allowability increases the risk of noncompliance questioned costs, and potential repayment of federal funds. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $403,805 were identified by reviewing each transaction prior to the date and for the month after the award began to ensure there are no likely questioned costs. Recommendation for the organization from the auditor: • Formalize and implement written policies and procedures governing identification, approval, and accounting for pre-award costs. • Require documented written approval from the federal awarding agency prior to charging any pre-award costs to federal awards. • Provide training to program and finance personnel on Uniform Guidance cost allowability requirements, including 2 CFR 200.458 and 2 CFR 200.403. • Implement supervisory review controls to ensure costs charged to federal awards are incurred within the approval period of performance or have documented prior approval. Corrective Action Plan for Pre-award costs Management acknowledges the audit finding that pre-award costs were charged to multiple federal awards for expenses incurred before the approved period of performance beginning October 1, 2024. The costs were incurred without the required written prior approval from the Maryland Department of Labor (MD DOL), the pass-through entity. As a result, unallowable costs were reimbursed and later removed from the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Management determined that the issue resulted from insufficient internal controls, the absence of formal written procedures for pre-award costs, and gaps in staff understanding of Uniform Guidance requirements. To address these root causes, the organization adopted a formal written policy governing the identification, approval, documentation, and accounting of pre-award costs. The policy requires written prior approval from MD DOL before any pre-award costs may be incurred or charged to a federal award and establishes documentation, retention, and accounting standards to support compliance with 2 CFR 200.458 and 2 CFR 200.403. Third, the organization also implemented a mandatory written approval workflow requiring program and grants staff to prepare and submit a formal request to MD DOL whenever pre-award costs are anticipated. No costs may be incurred until written approval is received. Approval documentation must be retained in both the official grant file and the accounting system. This workflow is now part of the grant start-up process for all federal awards. Fourth, the organization strengthened supervisory review controls to ensure that all costs charged to federal awards fall within the approved period of performance or have documented prior approval. These controls include a pre-posting cost allowability checklist, supervisory review and approval of all federal charges, and accounting system alerts that flag costs incurred outside the period of performance. Additionally, the Compliance Officer will conduct quarterly internal compliance reviews to verify adherence to federal requirements and internal policies. Finally, the organization implemented preventive measures to ensure long-term compliance. These include maintaining a centralized grant calendar with period-of-performance dates, requiring dual review of costs charged during the first 90 days of new awards, and conducting semi-annual internal audits of federal expenditures. Any discrepancies identified will be reported to senior leadership within five business days. Management is committed to ensuring full compliance with Uniform Guidance and MD DOL requirements. All corrective actions described above have been implemented or will be fully implemented by July 31, 2026. The organization believes these actions sufficiently address the audit findings and significantly strengthen internal controls over federal award management. Corrective Action Plan Summary Corrective Action Responsible Staff/Role Target Completion Date Evidence of Completion Develop and implement formal Pre-award Cost Policy Finance Director June 1, 2026 Final approved policy; distribution email; policy posted to shared drive Establish mandatory written prior approval workflow Finance Director June 30, 2026 Completed approval request template; sample approval documentation; updated grant file checklist Conduct Uniform Guidance training Compliance Officer July 31, 2026 Training materials; attendance logs; post-training assessments Implement supervisory review controls Finance Director June 30, 2026 Completed checklists; system screenshots; supervisor sign-offs Perform quarterly internal compliance reviews Compliance Officer Quarterly, ongoing Quarterly review reports; corrective action memos (if applicable) Maintain centralized grant calendar Director of Performance and Compliance June 30, 2026 Updated grant calendar; access logs or distribution email Conduct semi-annual internal audits Compliance Officer Semi-annual, ongoing Internal audit reports; follow-up documentation Dual review of early-period charges Finance Director; Grants Manager July 1, 2026 Dual-review sign-off forms; documented approvals
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-004 and agrees that weaknesses in the review and approval of expenses represent a material weakness in internal control over compliance. The reimbursement of personal credit card expenses and the charging of those transactions to federal awar...
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-004 and agrees that weaknesses in the review and approval of expenses represent a material weakness in internal control over compliance. The reimbursement of personal credit card expenses and the charging of those transactions to federal awards resulted in unallowable costs and demonstrated a breakdown in the review process for employee reimbursements and supporting documentation. Although the known questioned costs total only $46, the broader risk is that additional unallowable, unsupported, or improperly coded expenses could be charged to federal awards if review controls are not strengthened. Management determined that the root causes included insufficiently detailed procedures for reviewing employee reimbursement requests, inconsistent verification of business purpose and allowability before reimbursement, and inadequate supervisory review of expense documentation before costs were posted to federal awards. Existing controls were not precise enough to identify personal or otherwise unallowable charges embedded within reimbursement activity, particularly when descriptions were incomplete or reviewers did not independently confirm that the expense was necessary, reasonable, properly documented, and allowable under Uniform Guidance. To address this material weakness, management is implementing a corrective action plan focused on strengthening pre-payment and pre-posting review of employee reimbursements and other expense transactions charged to federal awards. The plan includes four key actions: revising reimbursement and accounts payable procedures to require detailed support for every request; requiring documented secondary review by supervisory or finance personnel independent of the submitter; implementing exception-based review procedures for higher-risk transactions; and performing periodic post-payment monitoring to confirm that review procedures are operating effectively and that unallowable costs are promptly identified and corrected. Under the revised process, no employee reimbursement or expense charged to a federal award will be approved unless the request includes sufficient supporting documentation to allow the reviewer to determine that the cost is necessary, reasonable, allocable as applicable, consistently treated, and adequately documented in accordance with Uniform Guidance cost principles. Reviewers will be required to confirm the business purpose of the transaction, assess whether the type of cost is allowable under the terms of the award and applicable federal regulations, and verify that no personal items, duplicate charges, sales tax errors, or unsupported amounts are included. If documentation is incomplete or a charge appears questionable, the transaction will be held pending clarification, recoded to a non-federal source, or denied reimbursement as appropriate. Any unallowable expense identified after reimbursement will be promptly removed from the applicable federal award and reported through management’s corrective follow-up procedures. Management will also reinforce accountability through targeted training and oversight. Employees who prepare, review, approve, or process reimbursements and expense reports affecting federal awards will receive training on allowable cost principles, documentation expectations, and the importance of careful review under 2 CFR Part 200, including the requirement that costs be adequately documented and necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award. In addition, Finance will generate periodic exception reports highlighting reimbursement activity charged to federal awards, personal credit card reimbursements, and other transactions meeting defined risk criteria. These reports will be reviewed by management to identify trends, address control failures, and implement additional corrective measures when needed. Management believes these corrective actions directly address the auditors’ recommendations and strengthen controls over the review and approval of expenses charged to federal awards without repeating the corrective actions already established for pre-award costs, allocation methodology, or broader financial close procedures. Responsibility for implementation will rest primarily with the Finance Director, in coordination with accounts payable, grants, and program leadership. Management expects enhanced documentation standards, independent review requirements, exception-based oversight, and monitoring activities to reduce the risk of personal or otherwise unallowable expenses being reimbursed and charged to federal awards in future periods. Corrective Action Plan Summary Corrective Action Responsible Staff/Role Target Completion Date Evidence of Completion Revise and adopt written expense reimbursement and accounts payable review procedures requiring itemized receipts, documented business purpose, funding source identification, and explicit confirmation that requested costs are not personal in nature. Finance Director; Accounts Payable Supervisor June 30, 2026 Approved procedures; updated reimbursement forms; staff distribution records. Implement a standardized reimbursement review checklist requiring reviewer validation of allowability, Accounts Payable Supervisor; July 15, 2026 Completed checklist template; sample reviewed reimbursement business purpose, receipt support, coding accuracy, and identification of any personal or unsupported charges before reimbursement or posting to a federal award. Finance Director packages; approval signoff documentation. Require independent supervisory review and approval for all employee reimbursements and any expense transaction charged in whole or in part to a federal award, including personal credit card reimbursement requests. Finance Director Effective immediately Supervisor approval records; signed reimbursement packages; workflow evidence showing independent review. Provide targeted training for employees, supervisors, accounts payable, and grants personnel on allowable cost principles, documentation standards, and reviewer responsibilities for expenses affecting federal awards. Compliance Officer; Finance Director August 31, 2026 Training materials; attendance logs; completed acknowledgements or knowledge checks. Create periodic exception reports for reimbursement activity charged to federal awards, missing receipt transactions, unusual merchants, and other higher-risk expense patterns, and require documented management review of the results. Accounting Manager; Finance Director September 30, 2026 Exception report format; monthly or quarterly review logs; documented follow-up on exceptions. Perform quarterly post-payment monitoring of a sample of reimbursed expenses charged to federal awards to verify compliance with documentation, Compliance Officer; Finance Director Quarterly, beginning September 30, 2026 Quarterly monitoring reports; exception logs; evidence of recoding, recovery, or corrective follow-up. approval, and allowability requirements and to ensure prompt correction of any identified exceptions.
The Division is in the process of designing and implementing a precise control to ensure that participants self-certify that they meet the grant eligibility requirements and that such evidence is maintained. Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/2026 Responsible Contact Person: Michael Zielinski, Major,...
The Division is in the process of designing and implementing a precise control to ensure that participants self-certify that they meet the grant eligibility requirements and that such evidence is maintained. Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/2026 Responsible Contact Person: Michael Zielinski, Major, Divisional Commander.
The Division is in the process of designing and implementing a precise control to ensure that the amount of food distributed is properly reviewed and that the Division maintains such evidence. Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/2026 Responsible Contact Person: Michael Zielinski, Major, Divisional Com...
The Division is in the process of designing and implementing a precise control to ensure that the amount of food distributed is properly reviewed and that the Division maintains such evidence. Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/2026 Responsible Contact Person: Michael Zielinski, Major, Divisional Commander.
MANAGEMENT VIEWS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN REPORT ON FEDERAL AWARDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OMB UNIFORM GUIDANCE SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 Finding 2025-002 Subrecipient Monitoring- Lack of evidence of subrecipient Uniform Guidance report reviews Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: Various ...
MANAGEMENT VIEWS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN REPORT ON FEDERAL AWARDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OMB UNIFORM GUIDANCE SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 Finding 2025-002 Subrecipient Monitoring- Lack of evidence of subrecipient Uniform Guidance report reviews Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: Various agencies Award Names: Southeast Region Cybersecurity Collaboration Center (SERC3), Establish, manage, and maintain a public-private partnership (PPP) additive manufacturing (AM) consortium for the Rapid Manufacturing Propulsion Technology (RAMPT), Developing effective adaptation strategies to enhance the resilience of farmers under changing climate, Towards a sustainable bioeconomy: Biotransformation of paper mill sludge for value-added chirally pure (R)-1,3-butanediol production, A systems approach to perennial forage management using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Award Numbers: 212514, 208409, 200987, 205258, and 205264 Assistance Listing Title: Cybersecurity, Energy Security & Emergency Response (CESER), Science, Integrative Activities, and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) Assistance Listing Number: 81.008, 43.RD, 47.083, and 10.310, Award Year: 2024 - 2025 Pass-through entity: UT-Batelle LLC, RPM Innovations, Inc., New Mexico State University, Regents of University of the University of California, and University of Tennessee Management notes 2025-002 is a repeat finding of 2024-002, but given the timing of the finding last year, our 2024 CAP was anticipated to be completed as of October 1, 2025. To ensure Auburn University is in compliance with 2CFR 200.332(f), Auburn University has implemented the following corrective action plan: Since the audit period, the University has completed a comprehensive review of its subrecipient monitoring framework and has been working to distribute workload more effectively with the goal of building consistency in subrecipient monitoring procedures. This includes efforts to clarify ownership of monitoring tasks, implementing a more centralized and standardized approach to documentation, and balancing the day-to-day operational duties across the subaward team to allow for appropriate focus on Uniform Guidance compliance. Brief internal training sessions or check-ins will be conducted to reinforce expectations and ensure that all staff are aligned with the updated documentation practices. Current procedures were revised to address risk assessments and annual monitoring. These improvements are designed to ensure consistency, accountability, and compliance with Uniform Guidance expectations moving forward. We will document when all reviews of sub-recipients’ financial statements/Uniform Guidance reports occur and who completes the reviews. These reviews will be entity-specific and conducted annually. The corrective actions noted herein have been implemented as of October 1, 2025. Contact: Tony Ventimiglia Asst. VP Research Administration Office of the Senior VP for Research & Economic Development Amy Douglas Associate VP Financial Services/Controller Completed Date: October 1, 2025
« 1 10 11 13 14 519 »