Finding 1166971 (2025-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2025-12-30

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Incorrect sliding fee categories were assigned to patients due to inconsistent application of policies and system glitches.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with the Health Center Program Compliance Manual regarding sliding fee eligibility assessments and updates.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Provide training for intake staff and enhance monitoring procedures in the Athena system to ensure accurate patient data and timely updates.

Finding Text

Criteria: The Health Center Program Compliance Manual requires that a health center establish and maintain systems for determining sliding fee eligibility. The Organization should implement procedures to assess and reassess all patients’ income and family size in accordance with board-approved policies and applicable poverty guidelines. Additionally, management should establish a defined cutoff date for updating poverty guidelines in the billing system and implement a review process to ensure that patient records are properly updated when discrepancies between applied categories and recorded information occur. Condition: During our testing of sliding fee applications, we noted that one of the patients tested was assigned an incorrect sliding fee category based on available income information. In addition, for three patients, data extracted from the billing system reflected a different sliding fee category than that shown in the patient’s individual profile. Management attributed these discrepancies to a system glitch and to timing differences in updating the poverty guidelines within the billing system. Cause: Although management has established “Sliding Fee Scale Procedure” policies, the registration guidelines are not being consistently followed. Furthermore, monitoring procedures in the Athena system have not been sufficient to detect or prevent these recurring discrepancies. Effect: Failure to properly apply the sliding fee scale may result in patients being charged an incorrect fee or no fee, a condition could be placed on the grant’s Notice of Award if HRSA determines that the Organization is not demonstrating compliance with the sliding fee program requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that management provide periodic training to intake personnel to ensure accurate application of the sliding fee scale based on verified income and household information. In addition, management should enhance review and monitoring procedures within the Athena system to ensure the accuracy of patient data and coordinate with billing staff as needed to update poverty guidelines by a designated cut-off date. Management's response: Management agrees with auditor's recommendation. Refer to Corrective Action Plan for expected date of completion.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s View: During the recent audit, a finding was identified within the Sliding Fee Discount Program (SFDP) related primarily to data entry errors, incomplete documentation, and lack of proper review. Errors included incorrect or missing income calculations, misclassification of SFDP categories, and inaccuracies entered into the EHR. These discrepancies were attributed to inconsistent staff performance, insufficient oversight, and gaps in training. Since the audit, the former Office Manager and two front desk employees responsible for SFDP data entry have left the organization. Proposed Corrective Action: 1. Strengthening Oversight & Accountability Office Manager Signature Required on ALL SFDP Forms signifying they have reviewed for accuracy, completeness, verified income documentation, ensure calculations are correct, and confirm appropriately and accurately entered into Athena software. 2. Updated Workflow & Process Improvement 3. Training & Competency Development - Annual Refresher Training (All Front Office Staff) The next training has already been scheduled for the week of December 8th. 4. Onboarding Process for New Front Office Employees A strengthened onboarding process will ensure new hires understand the SFDP accurately from day one. 5. Ongoing Monitoring & Quality Assurance Monthly Internal Reviews The Office Manager will audit a percentage of SFDP applications monthly, they will be documented and accuracy rates will be documented for all frontdesk staff. The Director of Administration will ensure these are maintained monthly. 6. Reinforcing the Importance of SFDP Accuracy Anticipated Completion Date: No later then December 31, 2025 Responsible Official: Diana Salcedo, Director of Administration

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring Eligibility

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1166966 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1166967 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1166968 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1166969 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1166970 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
93.988 Expanding Access to Evidence-Based Diabetes Programs Using Project ECHO $224,280
93.224 HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM (COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS, MIGRANT HEALTH CENTERS, HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS, AND PUBLIC HOUSING PRIMARY CARE) $178,856
93.224 GRANTS FOR NEW AND EXPANDED SERVICES UNDER THE HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM $47,229
93.318 PROTECTING AND IMPROVING HEALTH GLOBALLY: BUILDING AND STRENGTHENING PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT, SYSTEMS, CAPACITY AND SECURITY $44,552
93.778 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $23,000
93.527 GRANTS FOR NEW AND EXPANDED SERVICES UNDER THE HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM $13,765
93.493 CONGRESSIONAL DIRECTIVES $7,526
97.008 NON-PROFIT SECURITY PROGRAM $0