Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
64,113
In database
Filtered Results
10,482
Matching current filters
Showing Page
6 of 420
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Significant Deficiency
2025-001 Reporting on USDA Foods Corrective action planned: Anticipated completion date: Contact person responsible for corrective action: Pmtners INW will implement a monthly reporting procedure requiring a documented inventmy reconciliation of each USDA program to the provided bills of lading prio...
2025-001 Reporting on USDA Foods Corrective action planned: Anticipated completion date: Contact person responsible for corrective action: Pmtners INW will implement a monthly reporting procedure requiring a documented inventmy reconciliation of each USDA program to the provided bills of lading prior to submission to WSDA. Each invent tory reconciliation will be reviewed and signed by a staff member who did not prepare the repmt. These reconciliations will be retained alongside monthly program inventmy repmts. Target: October 31 st . We will begin immediately with the first dual verification repmt being completed for the month of September. Justin Carlile JustinC@partnersinw.org
Legal Services Corporation 09.744060 Basic Field Grant Grant Period: 1/1/2025 – 12/31/2025 Contract Number: 744060 U.S Department of Justice 16.575 Victims of Crime Act Grant Periods: 10/1/24-9/30/25 and 10/1/25 – 9/30/26 Contract Number: 4055105; 4055106 Supreme Court of Texas Basic Civil Legal Ser...
Legal Services Corporation 09.744060 Basic Field Grant Grant Period: 1/1/2025 – 12/31/2025 Contract Number: 744060 U.S Department of Justice 16.575 Victims of Crime Act Grant Periods: 10/1/24-9/30/25 and 10/1/25 – 9/30/26 Contract Number: 4055105; 4055106 Supreme Court of Texas Basic Civil Legal Services Program Grant Period: 9/1/2023 – 8/31/2026 Contract Number: 26030 2025-001 Internal Controls over Compliance - Allowable Activities and Costs – Payroll (Significant Deficiency) Recommendation: We recommend the Organization review its timekeeping policies and procedures to ensure time sheets are retained for all payroll transactions to support the allocation of compensation between cost objectives and that these are provided timely to the Director of Finance to reconcile the allocation of personnel costs charged on the time sheets to the budget estimates used to bill grantors. This should be done in conjunction with monthly or quarterly billings (or other determined regular interval), at fiscal year-end, and at the end of the grant year (if different from the Organization’s fiscal year). Corrective Action: • AVDA will revise and formally approve its written timekeeping and payroll-allocation procedures. Every employee whose compensation is charged in whole or in part to a grant must submit a complete and accurate timesheet for each pay period. • Timesheets will reflect actual activity and identify the appropriate program, grant, or cost objective. Budget estimates will not serve as final support for payroll charges unless permitted by the applicable award and reconciled to actual activity. • Each employee and the employee's supervisor will approve the timesheet by the established deadline. Finance will maintain an exception log for late, missing, incomplete, or corrected timesheets and will follow up before grant billing or reimbursement requests are finalized. • The Finance Department will complete and retain a payroll-compliance checklist for each pay period. Payroll costs lacking required support or approval will not be charged to a grant and will remain charged to unrestricted funds unless and until adequate documentation is obtained and reviewed. • The Director of Finance will update employee pay rates and grant allocations promptly after each compensation, funding, or assignment change. Finance will verify current pay rates before grant billing and will document the review. • At least monthly, the Director of Finance will reconcile payroll-allocation records to the payroll register and general ledger. The reconciliation will confirm that employee allocations do not exceed 100 percent, rates agree with actual payroll, charges are supported by approved timesheets, and charges do not exceed applicable grant budgets. • A reviewer who did not prepare the reconciliation will document review and approval. The CEO will document review of organizational payroll. Payroll information relating to the CEO will be reviewed under the Board-approved process for executive compensation and payroll oversight. • Management will provide and document training for employees, supervisors, and Finance personnel regarding timekeeping, payroll allocation, allowable-cost requirements, approvals, and record retention. • AVDA will maintain timesheets, approvals, payroll registers, reconciliations, exception logs, and supporting allocation records in a centralized electronic location consistent with federal and grant-specific retention requirements. Responsible Parties: - Lisa Mikosh, Director of Finance - Marcello Gonzalez, Bookkeeper - Maisha Colter, CEO Date to be Corrected: December 31, 2026
Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action The Executive Director will work with the Fee Accountant in order to review and enhance year end close processes to ensure accuracy and timeliness of reporting. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: June 30, 2026 Person Responsible for Cor...
Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action The Executive Director will work with the Fee Accountant in order to review and enhance year end close processes to ensure accuracy and timeliness of reporting. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: June 30, 2026 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Eric Cronin, Executive Director
Housing Voucher Cluster - Assistance Listing No. No. 14.871 and 14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority implements controls to ensure abatement is timely for units that do not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the required timeframe. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: ...
Housing Voucher Cluster - Assistance Listing No. No. 14.871 and 14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority implements controls to ensure abatement is timely for units that do not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the required timeframe. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: HAKC has reviewed its inspection and HAP abatement procedures and implemented additional controls to ensure that HAP is abated timely when required HQS deficiencies are not corrected within the applicable timeframe. Inspection staff are responsible for documenting deficiencies, establishing the applicable correction/reinspection timeframe, and monitoring the status of required repairs. HAKC has strengthened supervisory oversight to ensure that units failing to correct deficiencies within the required timeframe are identified and referred for appropriate HAP abatement. The corrective controls include: • Tracking of failed inspections and required correction dates; • Monitoring of reinspection results; • Identification of units that remain in failed status after the applicable correction period; • Supervisory review of outstanding failed inspections; • Verification that HAP abatement is initiated when required; • Documentation of the effective date of abatement and subsequent restoration of HAP when deficiencies are corrected; and • Periodic quality-control review of failed inspections and abatement activity• HAKC will continue to monitor inspection and abatement reports to identify potential delays and ensure corrective action is taken timely. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Director of HCV, Assistant Directors of HCV, HCV staff, and HCV Inspection Manager. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 12/31/2026.
Housing Voucher Cluster - Assistance Listing No. No. 14.871 and 14.879 Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority completes HQS inspections on an annual basis and implements a control to ensure compliance with annual HQS inspection requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: T...
Housing Voucher Cluster - Assistance Listing No. No. 14.871 and 14.879 Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority completes HQS inspections on an annual basis and implements a control to ensure compliance with annual HQS inspection requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: HAKC has reviewed its inspection procedures and implemented enhanced controls to ensure required inspections are scheduled, completed, documented, and monitored on an annual basis. HAKC is utilizing inspection tracking reports to identify units approaching or exceeding their required inspection dates. Inspection staff and supervisors are responsible for monitoring outstanding inspections and taking corrective action when an inspection is approaching its due date or becomes delinquent. Additional controls include: • Monitoring inspection due dates through recurring inspection reports; • Supervisory review of outstanding and delinquent inspections; • Tracking of inspection scheduling and completion; • Management review of inspection reports to identify overdue inspections; • Escalation of inspection deficiencies requiring corrective action; and • Staff training regarding annual inspection requirements and applicable HCV inspection procedures. HAKC will continue to perform periodic management reviews of inspection activity to ensure annual inspection requirements are being met and to identify potential delays before they become compliance deficiencies. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Director of HCV, Assistant Directors of HCV, HCV staff, and HCV Inspection Manager. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 12/31/2026
Housing Voucher Cluster -Assistance Listing No. No. 14.871 and 14.879 Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority implements controls to ensure HUD-50058 recertifications are uploaded to PIC. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action ...
Housing Voucher Cluster -Assistance Listing No. No. 14.871 and 14.879 Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority implements controls to ensure HUD-50058 recertifications are uploaded to PIC. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: HAKC has implemented additional controls to ensure HUD-50058 forms are submitted timely and accurately to HUD's designated reporting system. The HCV Department is monitoring HUD-50058 submissions through available PIC reporting and error reports. Staff are responsible for reviewing submission results and correcting fatal errors or rejected certifications. Supervisory staff will monitor outstanding certifications and submission errors to ensure corrections are completed and successfully transmitted. HAKC has also incorporated the following controls: • Monitoring of HUD-50058 submission status; • Review of PIC error reports and correction of fatal errors; • Monitoring of overdue annual reexaminations and certifications that have not been successfully posted; • Supervisory review of outstanding 50058 submissions; • Periodic reconciliation of HAKC participant records against HUD reporting records; and • Staff training regarding HUD-50058 reporting requirements and the importance of complete, accurate, and timely submissions. HAKC recognizes that HUD requires PHAs to electronically submit HUD-50058 information and that complete, accurate, and timely reporting is necessary for HUD program monitoring. HAKC will continue to monitor 50058 submission activity and error reports as part of its ongoing quality-control process. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible tor corrective action: Director of HCV, Assistant Directors of HCV, HCV Staff, and Compliance Team Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 12/31/2026\
Housing Voucher Cluster - Assistance Listing No. No. 14.871 and 14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their internal controls over the eligibility requirements to ensure all recertifications are performed timely. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagree...
Housing Voucher Cluster - Assistance Listing No. No. 14.871 and 14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their internal controls over the eligibility requirements to ensure all recertifications are performed timely. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: HAKC has reviewed and strengthened its internal controls and procedures for completing annual reexaminations in a timely manner. HAKC implemented enhanced monitoring of annual reexamination activity through regularly scheduled reports and supervisory review. As part of the corrective action, HAKC established a centralized tracking process to identify upcoming and delinquent annual reexaminations. Staff are required to monitor reexamination due dates and take appropriate action to obtain required documentation and complete the reexamination process timely. HAKC also implemented the following additional controls: • Weekly monitoring of annual reexamination completion and processing status; • Use of delinquent reexamination reports to identify households requiring immediate action; • Supervisory review of outstanding and delinquent reexaminations; • Monitoring of EIV-related failed or outstanding reexamination dates; • Scheduled mass annual reexamination appointments to address outstanding workload; • Additional staff training regarding annual reexamination requirements, income verification, allowances, deductions, and applicable HUD regulations. HAKC will continue to monitor annual reexamination performance through management-level review and will take corrective action when deficiencies or delays are identified. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Director of HCVand Assistant Directors of HCV
Finding 1238695 (2025-002)
Material Weakness 2025
Finding 2025-002 Cash Management Contact Person: Tracy Carr, Rajee Rao Management Response: We agree with the auditors’ comments and the following action plan was taken last year to implement internal control procedures to allow for timely reporting: A grant reporting schedule was developed and has ...
Finding 2025-002 Cash Management Contact Person: Tracy Carr, Rajee Rao Management Response: We agree with the auditors’ comments and the following action plan was taken last year to implement internal control procedures to allow for timely reporting: A grant reporting schedule was developed and has been followed since June 2025 which has enabled the submission of the monthly grant reimbursement reports to be filed by the due date since July 2025. It has required a group effort by the entire staff and the individual members of the finance team in the responsibilities to meet the deadline. The continued use of this schedule has proven to keep the process on track and allow the organization to adhere to the grant deadlines. Completion Date: Beginning July 1, 2025 and thereafter
The Authority acknowledges the deficiencies identified in the Public Housing Capital Fund Program. The majority of the questioned costs originated before 2024 under prior management. The primary issue was the failure to identify and document the specific property to which each disbursement related. ...
The Authority acknowledges the deficiencies identified in the Public Housing Capital Fund Program. The majority of the questioned costs originated before 2024 under prior management. The primary issue was the failure to identify and document the specific property to which each disbursement related. The Authority will strengthen its Capital Fund cash management procedures, including property-level coding and supporting documentation for each disbursement, periodic reconciliation of grant drawdowns to eligible expenditures by property, and supervisory review. Staff will be trained on these procedures to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Dexter Brady, Interim Executive Director, is the responsible official and this will be completed by December 31, 2026.
The National Preservation Institute acknowledges the finding related to the untimely submission of required Federal reports. The reporting delay was not the result of a failure to perform the underlying activities or maintain the information necessary to complete the report, but rather a breakdown i...
The National Preservation Institute acknowledges the finding related to the untimely submission of required Federal reports. The reporting delay was not the result of a failure to perform the underlying activities or maintain the information necessary to complete the report, but rather a breakdown in the process for monitoring and tracking reporting deadlines. Management has reviewed its reporting processes and implemented additional oversight procedures to ensure reporting deadlines are identified, monitored, and communicated on a timely basis. A centralized compliance calendar will be established to track all Federal reporting requirements and due dates, and responsibility for monitoring reporting deadlines has been assigned to the National Preservation Institute’s Executive Director. The Executive Director will periodically review reporting requirements throughout the year to ensure that reports are submitted within required timeframes. Management believes these actions will strengthen compliance with Federal reporting requirements and reduce the likelihood of future late submissions.
The National Preservation Institute acknowledges the finding related to procurement documentation. While the National Preservation Institute believes its procurement activities were conducted in a manner consistent with Federal requirements, certain documentation necessary to demonstrate compliance ...
The National Preservation Institute acknowledges the finding related to procurement documentation. While the National Preservation Institute believes its procurement activities were conducted in a manner consistent with Federal requirements, certain documentation necessary to demonstrate compliance was not retained in a manner that readily supported the procurement decisions. Management has reviewed the circumstances surrounding the finding and has reinforced expectations regarding procurement documentation, record retention, and compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Going forward, procurement files associated with federally funded activities will be reviewed to ensure that all required supporting documentation is generated and retained, including documentation supporting the basis for contractor selection, cost or price analyses, procurement method, and any other records required by Uniform Guidance. In addition, the National Preservation Institute will formally adopt a procurement policy designed to align with the procurement standards contained in Uniform Guidance, including requirements related to competition, conflict of interest, documentation, contractor selection, and procurement record retention. Management believes that the combination of a formal procurement policy and enhanced review procedures will strengthen compliance with Federal procurement requirements and ensure that procurement files contain sufficient documentation to support future monitoring, audit, and reporting requests.
Property & Equipment: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: AIP 47, AIP 48, AIP 49, AIP 50, AIP 51, 2025 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Transpor...
Property & Equipment: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: AIP 47, AIP 48, AIP 49, AIP 50, AIP 51, 2025 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Transportation Pass-Through Numbers: AIP 47, AIP 48, AIP 49, AIP 50, AIP 51 Award Period: Year-Ended December 31, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Recommendation: It is recommended the Authority establish and maintain a separate property record, or add identifying fields to the existing capital asset listing, for all assets purchased in whole or in part with federal funds. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Authority will establish and maintain a separate property record, or add identifying fields to the existing capital asset listing, for all assets purchased in whole or in part with federal funds. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Kyle Christiansen, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2026 The Bemidji Regional Airport Authority respectfully submits the following summary schedule of prior audit findings for the year ended December 31, 2024. Audit period: January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 The findings from the December 31, 2024, schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the prior year.
Controls Over Reporting Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: AIP 47, AIP 48, AIP 49, AIP 50, AIP 51, 2025 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Transp...
Controls Over Reporting Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: AIP 47, AIP 48, AIP 49, AIP 50, AIP 51, 2025 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Transportation Pass-Through Numbers: AIP 47, AIP 48, AIP 49, AIP 50, AIP 51 Award Period: Year-Ended December 31, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Recommendation: It is recommended the Authority have a secondary person reviewing these reports before they are submitted to the federal agency. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Authority will evaluate its internal staff capacity to determine if an internal control policy over reviews is beneficial. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Kyle Christiansen, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2026
The organization implemented a digital data management platform called ClientTrack and begin to maintain client records for program years 2025 and thereafter to ensure the proper retention of all required client eligibility and service documentation. In addition, management will perform periodic sel...
The organization implemented a digital data management platform called ClientTrack and begin to maintain client records for program years 2025 and thereafter to ensure the proper retention of all required client eligibility and service documentation. In addition, management will perform periodic self-assessments to monitor compliance with eligibility documentation and record retention requirements. Certain participant files pertaining to enrollments prior to 2025 were lost due to flood damage at an o􀀁-site storage facility and were not recoverable.
Enhancements are being implemented to ensure all grant reporting requirements are met on a timely basis by creating a grant reporting calendar and deadlines.
Enhancements are being implemented to ensure all grant reporting requirements are met on a timely basis by creating a grant reporting calendar and deadlines.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will implement a policy to ensure a documented review process and reconciliation of costs to the report. Responsible party and timeline for completion: The Controller will be responsible for oversee...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will implement a policy to ensure a documented review process and reconciliation of costs to the report. Responsible party and timeline for completion: The Controller will be responsible for overseeing the implementation of the corrective action plan and will ensure the appropriate personnel are involved in the review and reconciliation process. The corrective action plan will be implemented immediately and take place upon the next report submission.
Management acknowledges that, of the two federally funded contracts reviewed during the audit, one contract was identified as not containing all applicable federal contract provisions required by Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200. The other contract reviewed did not result in this exception. The Town fo...
Management acknowledges that, of the two federally funded contracts reviewed during the audit, one contract was identified as not containing all applicable federal contract provisions required by Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200. The other contract reviewed did not result in this exception. The Town followed the appropriate procurement process in selecting the contractor. The contractor was NHDOT LPA-certified/prequalified, the services were provided as required, and the expenditures were determined to be allowable, resulting in no questioned costs. The audit report specifically notes that the services were appropriately procured and ultimately deemed allowable. The project was administered through NHDOT's Local Public Agency (LPA) process. Contractors and subcontractors performing work through the LPA process are subject to NHDOT Office of Federal Compliance (OFC) approval requirements. The Town's administration of the project therefore included the State's LPA and OFC oversight requirements in addition to the Town's own procurement process. Management recognizes that this oversight does not replace the requirement to include all applicable federal provisions in the contract itself. Going forward, the Town will strengthen its review of contracts funded in whole or in part with federal awards to ensure that applicable federal contract provisions, including those required by Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, are identified and incorporated into future agreements. Planned implementation date of corrective action: September 28, 2026 Person responsible for corrective action: Joe Roark, Town Administrator
During fiscal year 2025 the Town had not yet consolidated all federally required grant administration practices and procedures into a comprehensive written federal grant policy. The Town did, however, maintain policies and procedures applicable to grant-funded activities, including a Procurement Pol...
During fiscal year 2025 the Town had not yet consolidated all federally required grant administration practices and procedures into a comprehensive written federal grant policy. The Town did, however, maintain policies and procedures applicable to grant-funded activities, including a Procurement Policy effective January 1, 2025 that applied regardless of funding source and addressed grant-funded purchases, procurement, conflicts of interest, record retention, and compliance with grant-specific requirements. The Town was first formally advised of the need for additional comprehensive written federal grant policies and procedures in connection with the audit of its 2024 federal awards, which was conducted in late 2025. Once the finding was communicated, management responded as soon as practicable by developing a comprehensive Grants, Donations & Fundraising Policy incorporating the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. The policy was adopted by the Board of Selectmen on March 31, 2026 and became effective April 1, 2026. Corrective action has been completed through adoption and implementation of this policy. Management also notes that the 2025 audit reported no questioned costs associated with this finding, identified no material weaknesses in internal control over the major federal program, and resulted in an unmodified opinion that the Town complied, in all material respects, with the applicable compliance requirements. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Occurred on April 1, 2026 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Tammy Penny, Finance Direct & Assistant Town Administrator
ELIGIBILITY Recommendation: The County should implement additional procedures to ensure case file reviews are being performed on a regular basis. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: Supervisor will sa...
ELIGIBILITY Recommendation: The County should implement additional procedures to ensure case file reviews are being performed on a regular basis. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: Supervisor will sample and perform a quality review on a quarterly basis to ensure case workers are accurately assessing eligibility. Review will be documented. Supervisor will review at least one casefile for each caseworker per quarter and randomly pull additional cases from new caseworkers. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Charlene Dale, Human Services Supervisor Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2026
Standard written sign-off (signature or initials and date) on every reimbursement request before submission, retained in the grant file; requests not submitted without it; emailed approvals filed with the request. Quarterly spot-check of a sample of requests by [independent reviewer], with results d...
Standard written sign-off (signature or initials and date) on every reimbursement request before submission, retained in the grant file; requests not submitted without it; emailed approvals filed with the request. Quarterly spot-check of a sample of requests by [independent reviewer], with results documented. Contact person, Myrna A. Young, Financial Manager (sign off and filing), independent reviewer and spot check by accountant, anticipated completion October 31, 2026, with first spot check Q4 2026.
Written compliance calendar of all federal reporting deadlines, including the Federal Audit Clearinghouse due date, with the Financial Manager as owner and the President as backup. Calendar reviewed at each standing monthly meeting. Outsourced accountants confirm the audit timeline and filing respon...
Written compliance calendar of all federal reporting deadlines, including the Federal Audit Clearinghouse due date, with the Financial Manager as owner and the President as backup. Calendar reviewed at each standing monthly meeting. Outsourced accountants confirm the audit timeline and filing responsibility in writing at the start of each audit cycle. Contact person, Myrna A. Young, Financial Manager, backup by Kathryn A. Higley, NCRP President, anticipated completion October 31, 2026.
Finding 2025-003 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase or Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Projects Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.155 Non Compliance: H – Unauthorized distributions of project assets Non Compli...
Finding 2025-003 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase or Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Projects Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.155 Non Compliance: H – Unauthorized distributions of project assets Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Allowable Activities Criteria: The Authority must receive HUD approval prior to making distributions to related party except for distributions made with surplus cash. Condition: Based on review of the distributions made by the Authority, there were distributions made that were not authorized by HUD and were greater than the surplus cash balance calculated. Context: During 2025, the Authority made distributions to a related party in the amount of $82,797 without HUD approval. Known Questioned Costs: $82,797 Cause: Controls and actions were not taken to ensure that HUD approval is obtained prior to making distributions to related parties. Effect: The Authority is in non-compliance with specific requirements of a major federal program. Recommendation: Management should establish internal controls and procedures to ensure that HUD approval is obtained prior to making distributions to related parties. Authority response: Management will ensure that HUD approval is obtained prior to making distributions to related parties. Benjamin C. Washington, CFO, is responsible for implementing this corrective action by December 31, 2026.
Finding 1238593 (2025-002)
Material Weakness 2025
Management agrees with the finding. The Corporation experienced turnover in key personnel who were responsible for adherence to the requirements of the Regulatory Agreement, thus resulting in late submission of the annual audited financial statements and the annual budget by the required deadlines. ...
Management agrees with the finding. The Corporation experienced turnover in key personnel who were responsible for adherence to the requirements of the Regulatory Agreement, thus resulting in late submission of the annual audited financial statements and the annual budget by the required deadlines. Management has implemented additional levels of oversight and assigned appropriate personnel to oversee adherence to the requirements of the Regulatory Agreement. This finding has been remediated in 2026 through the timely filings of the annual audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, and the 2026 annual budget.
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance – Cash Management and Reporting Recommendation: The Organization should formalize and consistently apply its review and approval controls over drawdown requests and grant reports. Management should review all submissions pri...
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance – Cash Management and Reporting Recommendation: The Organization should formalize and consistently apply its review and approval controls over drawdown requests and grant reports. Management should review all submissions prior to filing and maintain documentation evidencing the review and approval performed. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: This finding is a repeat of prior-year finding 2024-002. The Organization implemented its documented review and approval process over federal drawdown requests in September 2025. As noted in the finding, the two drawdown requests without documented review were submitted prior to that implementation, and the remaining drawdown requests tested included documented review and approval. Building on the corrective action plan submitted for fiscal year 2024, the Organization has taken the following corrective actions: ● Beginning in September 2025, the Organization implemented a documented two-level review and approval process for all federal drawdown requests. The preparer compiles the supporting documentation, and the Operations Director reviews the request and provides written approval prior to submission. ● Documented management review and approval has been extended to ETA-9130 financial reports, which are reviewed and approved by the Operations Director prior to filing. ● The Organization's Cash Management Policy was formally updated, effective March 3, 2026, as part of the corrective action plan submitted to and approved by the U.S. Department of Labor. The policy requires written management approval prior to submission of any drawdown request, documented management review of ETA-9130 financial reports prior to filing, and retention of all approval evidence in the electronic grant file, memorializing the drawdown review procedures in practice since September 2025. ● No drawdown request or financial report is submitted until the Operations Director's written approval has been received and saved to the electronic grant file, so evidence of review and approval is retained for every submission. ● The Operations Director will conduct quarterly internal reviews to ensure this process is being followed. The drawdown review and approval process has been in practice since September 2025, and the review and approval requirements for drawdown requests and financial reports were formally documented in policy effective March 3, 2026. These controls continue to be monitored on an ongoing basis to prevent recurrence. Name(s) of contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Cory Finley, Operations Director, with oversight by Brandi Jahnke, Chief Executive Officer Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Drawdown review and approval implemented in practice as of September 2025; review and approval requirements formalized in written policy effective March 3, 2026. The Operations Director will conduct quarterly internal reviews on an ongoing basis. If the U.S. Department of Labor has questions regarding this plan, please call Brandi Jahnke at (816) 520-4404.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE AUDIT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Federal Program: Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.509 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: MN-2020-020-01, MN-2023-045-00 Pass-Through Agency: Mi...
UNIFORM GUIDANCE AUDIT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Federal Program: Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.509 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: MN-2020-020-01, MN-2023-045-00 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number: MN-2020-020-01, MN-2023-045-00 Award Period: Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compliance Requirement: Property and Equipment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Recommendation: Equipment acquired under federal awards needs to have proper maintenance of records including description, source of funding, who holds title, acquisition date, cost, percentage of Federal agency participation in the cost, location, use and condition, and any disposition data. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Transit Board will continue to work on the maintenance of records for property and equipment acquired under federal awards. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Kathy Schultz, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2027
« 1 4 5 7 8 420 »