Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,809
In database
Filtered Results
23,815
Matching current filters
Showing Page
469 of 953
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Corrective Action Plan: The Institute is making improvements to meet this deadline for future audits.
Corrective Action Plan: The Institute is making improvements to meet this deadline for future audits.
Corrective Action Plan: The Institute implemented the recommendations in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2024.
Corrective Action Plan: The Institute implemented the recommendations in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2024.
●      The superintendent was provided with a statement of liability coverage from the company's insurer, which was assumed to suffice as a performance bond, but going forward, only proper performance bonds will be accepted. The District has properly recorded the assets obtained through these funds....
●      The superintendent was provided with a statement of liability coverage from the company's insurer, which was assumed to suffice as a performance bond, but going forward, only proper performance bonds will be accepted. The District has properly recorded the assets obtained through these funds. The Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) has been consulted regarding the documentation of Davis-Bacon wages, and the District will require weekly wage reports from future contractors when federal funds are used for construction projects. The District will also ensure that all future capital improvement projects adhere to federal and state requirements, including obtaining appropriate performance bonds and incorporating prevailing wage rate provisions in contracts. Additionally, the Capital Assets Clerk will receive specific training on the proper documentation and recording of capital improvements and equipment. Anticipated Completion Date: July 1, 2024.
●      The District will contact the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to seek guidance on how to proceed with this matter. The Technology Coordinator will review and revise the procedures used to ensure that all future requests for funding are properly documented and aligned with actual unmet...
●      The District will contact the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to seek guidance on how to proceed with this matter. The Technology Coordinator will review and revise the procedures used to ensure that all future requests for funding are properly documented and aligned with actual unmet needs. Additional training will be provided to relevant staff on the requirements of federal programs, particularly new or unfamiliar ones. Anticipated Completion Date: July 1, 2024.
View Audit 317473 Questioned Costs: $1
Goshen Valley will submit the 2023 report package and ensure that all future audit reports are submitted to the FAC in a timely manner.
Goshen Valley will submit the 2023 report package and ensure that all future audit reports are submitted to the FAC in a timely manner.
View Audit 317439 Questioned Costs: $1
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the p...
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors –– Houghton Mifflin-Harcourt ($509,919), Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($419,826), and Smart Solutions ($449,303). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. MANAGEMENT’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i), 200.320(a)(2)(i) and Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, these procedures will include 1) obtaining all relevant information pertaining to procurements involving federal assistance from any cooperative purchasing group, 2) obtaining quotations from three qualified providers where applicable and documenting those results, and 3) properly document purchases using federal assistance when the vendor meets the criteria as a sole source provider. These three (3) updated procedures will be implemented during the remaining months of the 2023-2024 fiscal year, and all subsequent years, for future purchases where applicable.
View Audit 317437 Questioned Costs: $1
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for t...
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Saving Ourselves ($30,000), AGI Repair ($16,216), IXL ($19,218), Learning Systems Associates LLC ($25,425), AGC Education Inc. ($11,644), Apple ($163,505), Germ Solutions LLC ($160,070), Graham Security ($12,025), Curriculum Designers, Inc. ($27,875), RJ Rhodes Transit, Inc. ($24,845). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. MANAGEMENT’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, these procedures will include 1) obtaining all relevant information pertaining to procurements involving federal assistance from any cooperative purchasing group, 2) obtaining quotations from three qualified providers where applicable and documenting those results, and 3) properly document purchases using federal assistance when the vendor meets the criteria as a sole source provider. These three (3) updated procedures will be implemented during the remaining months of the 2023-2024 fiscal year, and all subsequent years, for future purchases where applicable.
View Audit 317437 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: 2024-01 Federal Agency Name: Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 Program Name: Student Financial Aid Cluster - Pell Finding Summary: During testing of students that were disbursed Pell Grants, three students out of a total of 40 that were tested did not receive th...
Finding: 2024-01 Federal Agency Name: Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 Program Name: Student Financial Aid Cluster - Pell Finding Summary: During testing of students that were disbursed Pell Grants, three students out of a total of 40 that were tested did not receive the appropriate amount of Pell Grant. Corrective Action: The Pell amounts were reviewed when the error was found during the audit. Students with incorrect amounts were then awarded additional funding based on Title IV guideline. Going forward the following steps will be taken to ensure the error does not occur in the future: • Financial aid staff will review the Financial Aid awarding system prior to awarding and make sure the correct fields have been updated to show the correct Pell cost of attendance. • A second review will be conducted again at census prior to disbursing funds • A final review will be conducted at the end of the semester.Responsible Individual: Crystal Morris, Director, Financial Aid Anticipated Completion Date: March 2024
The District will evaluate the procedures in place to ensure proper course of action is taken with respect to Title I. Contact Person: Joe Barker Anticipated Date of Completion: A review and determination will be completed in fiscal year 2025.
The District will evaluate the procedures in place to ensure proper course of action is taken with respect to Title I. Contact Person: Joe Barker Anticipated Date of Completion: A review and determination will be completed in fiscal year 2025.
Name of Auditee: Herkimer Housing Authority Name of Audit Firm: EFPR Group, CPAs, PLLC Period Covered by the Audit: June 30, 2023 CAP prepared by; Richard Dowe, Executive Director (A) Current Finding on the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (1) Finding 2023-001 (a) Comments on the finding an...
Name of Auditee: Herkimer Housing Authority Name of Audit Firm: EFPR Group, CPAs, PLLC Period Covered by the Audit: June 30, 2023 CAP prepared by; Richard Dowe, Executive Director (A) Current Finding on the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (1) Finding 2023-001 (a) Comments on the finding and recommendation - The Authority agrees with the finding. The Authority also agrees with the recommendation, please see below for action. (b) Action taken - The Authority will strengthen internal controls and training of staff to ensure reporting deadlines are met. (c) Planned implementation date - The Authority expects to complete the corrective actions by August 31, 2024, at the time of its next required unaudited submission.
Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, the...
Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, these procedures will include 1) obtaining all relevant information pertaining to procurements involving federal assistance from any cooperative purchasing group, 2) obtaining quotations from three qualified providers where applicable and documenting those results, and 3) properly document purchases using federal assistance when the vendor meets the criteria as a sole source provider. These three (3) updated procedures will be implemented during the remaining months of the 2023-2024 fiscal year, and all subsequent years, for future purchases where applicable.
View Audit 317412 Questioned Costs: $1
Condition: The District did not comply with the requirements of filing quarterly and period reports by the due dates set by ISBE. A total of 13 reports were filed late. Plan: Management will review its policies and procedures regarding timely grant expenditure report submissions with staff. Furtherm...
Condition: The District did not comply with the requirements of filing quarterly and period reports by the due dates set by ISBE. A total of 13 reports were filed late. Plan: Management will review its policies and procedures regarding timely grant expenditure report submissions with staff. Furthermore, staff will be properly trained for adhering to grant compliance reporting deadlines. Anticipated Date of Completion: 6/30/2024. Name of Contact Person: Dr. Jerry Jordan, Interim Superintendent. Management Response: Management will work together with staff to verify that grant compliance reporting deadlines are met moving forward.
FINDING 2023-003 – Reporting; Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Instance of Material Noncompliance Department of Labor Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the assessment and is in the process of implementing corrective action....
FINDING 2023-003 – Reporting; Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Instance of Material Noncompliance Department of Labor Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the assessment and is in the process of implementing corrective action. The Organization has tightened controls for grant management. Claims are subject to two levels of review before submission. Due dates of reports are closely tracked and supporting documentation is retained. Additionally, the improved controls that have been implemented in the fiscal department help to ensure accurate and timely reporting. Contact Persons: Ryan Berendsen, Chief Operating Officer Delana Kromer, Controller
Personnel Responsibile for Corrective Action: Janice Meier, Manager of Financial Services. Anticipated Completion Date: June 2024.Tracking and reporting ARPA expenditures includes many steps: - Assistant City Manager and Law approve projects submitted for use of ARPA funds. - Projects approved for ...
Personnel Responsibile for Corrective Action: Janice Meier, Manager of Financial Services. Anticipated Completion Date: June 2024.Tracking and reporting ARPA expenditures includes many steps: - Assistant City Manager and Law approve projects submitted for use of ARPA funds. - Projects approved for full or partial funding from ARPA funds are approved by City Council as either part of the CIP/MIP budget approval or as a standalone item. - Listing of projects and amounts to be funded by ARPA is provided to Finance Manager. - Contracting - Project Manager notifies the Law Department if the resulting contract is funded by ARPA funds. - Law Department approves contracts as to form (including review of required ARPA language. - Finance Manager reviews expenditures for each project. Expenditures would have been routed to appropriate individuals and approved in the finance system. - Finance Manager determines fuding to be moved to project based on expenditures made and allocated ARPA funds remaining for project. - Project expenditures over the ARPA funding will be funded through other sources. - Finance Manager enters current quarter and life to date information into SLFRF reporting. Second quarter 2024 and future submissions will be approved by the Director of Finance and Budget prior to entering into SLFRF system.
The County concurs with this finding and will be working to improve the timeliness of Medicaid eligibility determinations by using the COGNOS reports to determine which cases are approaching the due date.
The County concurs with this finding and will be working to improve the timeliness of Medicaid eligibility determinations by using the COGNOS reports to determine which cases are approaching the due date.
The County concurs with this finding and will be working to enhance documentation of the review of the Adoption Assistance eligibility determinations.
The County concurs with this finding and will be working to enhance documentation of the review of the Adoption Assistance eligibility determinations.
The County concurs with this finding and will be working to enhance documentation of the review of the IV-E eligibility determinations.
The County concurs with this finding and will be working to enhance documentation of the review of the IV-E eligibility determinations.
The County concurs with this finding and is refining procedures ensuring all reports, reviews, and communications are performed, reviewed, completed, and documented in a timely and accurate manner.
The County concurs with this finding and is refining procedures ensuring all reports, reviews, and communications are performed, reviewed, completed, and documented in a timely and accurate manner.
Finding 2023-005 Federal Agency Name: Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Applicable Federal Award Number and Year – Period 4 TIN#550559322 Federal Financial Assistance Listing #93.498 Compliance Requir...
Finding 2023-005 Federal Agency Name: Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Applicable Federal Award Number and Year – Period 4 TIN#550559322 Federal Financial Assistance Listing #93.498 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Costs Principles and Reporting Finding Summary: The original expenditure listing which would have included the review of the expenditure listing, was not retained. As a part of the single audit, the Clinic recreated the expenditure listing to support the expenditures reported on the special report submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services for Period 4, however there was no control in place to retain the original documentation of the determination of expenditures and their related review. In addition, there was no retained documentation of the review and approval of the Clinic’s special report submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services for Period 4 TIN #550559322. Responsible Individuals: Kayla Trent, Finance Director Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding and has reviewed the operating procedures of Robert C. Byrd Clinic. Furthermore, we have implemented procedures to retain expenditure listings and other support for federal awards as well as the related review. The Clinic began retaining expense reconciliations for all Grants. Anticipated Completion Date: July 1, 2024
TINDLEY ACTION PLAN 1. Develop and implement Procurement Policy (completed and on-going by CFO/Accounting Manager/Accountant/Grants Manager/Network President/Department Heads) a. Enhance written procedures for procurement and accounts payable. i. Purchases between $15,000-$25,000 will require two qu...
TINDLEY ACTION PLAN 1. Develop and implement Procurement Policy (completed and on-going by CFO/Accounting Manager/Accountant/Grants Manager/Network President/Department Heads) a. Enhance written procedures for procurement and accounts payable. i. Purchases between $15,000-$25,000 will require two quotes for all new vendors; purchases between $25,000-$75,000 will require three quotes for all vendors; and purchases over $75,000 will require a competitive bid process for all vendors. ii. Establish a Master Vendor list. 1. Master Vendors may be used for up to $20,000 for regular services and products in the normal course of business with dual approval by the Network President and CFO. b. Require vendor bids/quotes for services. c. Segregate purchasing duties. 2. Research new vendors prior to utilization (implemented and ongoing by CFO/Accountant) a. Are these vendors commonly known in the industry or the community? b. Does the vendor have a valid website, phone number, address and email address? 3. Conduct Periodic/Continuous Fraud-Detection Monitoring (CFO – at every fiscal year end) a. Annually identify (1) Tindley’s top 20 vendors, (2) all Tindley vendors receiving annual payments totaling more than $10,000, and (3) any new vendors receiving annual payments totaling more than $5,000. i. Ensure there are valid and updated contracts for these vendors. ii. Ensure the description for services on the corresponding. invoices are detailed and complete. iii. Assess multiple corresponding invoices that have the same total amounts. 4. Refine and codify job descriptions/job duties for Network President, CFO, Grants & Compliance Manager, and Director of Development (HR/Board to be completed by 9/30/24) a. Keep these job descriptions in a database to ensure a smooth transition in the event of a departure or retirement. b. The job descriptions should highlight the financial compliance aspects of each position. 5. Change reporting structure for CFO (to be implemented by HR/Board 9/30/24) a. CFO will report directly to the Board with a dotted line to the Network President. 6. Provide anti-fraud training for Network President, CFO, Director of Development, Grants & Compliance Manager, and in-house accounting professionals (to be implemented by Network President/CFO and completed by 11/30/24) 7. Establish a Whistleblower/Ethics hotline to report suspected fraud (to be implemented by HR 9/30/24) a. Ensure employees understand that it is available to report suspected fraud. b. Develop procedures for responding to whistleblower allegations. PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Tindley should adhere to strict ethical and legal standards to prevent fraud and ensure accountability. This procurement policy should be cross-referenced with current local, state, and federal laws. II. CODE OF CONDUCT A. Conflict of Interest Tindley purchasers shall not participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract if they have a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict arises when the Tindley purchaser; any immediate family member (spouse, child, parent, parent in law, sibling, or sibling in law); partner; or an organization that employs, or is about to employ, any of the above has a direct or indirect financial or other interest in, or will receive a tangible personal benefit from, a firm or individual considered for the contract award. An “organizational conflict of interest” is created because of a relationship that a Tindley employee has with a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is involved in the transaction such that the Tindley employee is or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving the related organization. B. Gifts, Money, Gratuities Tindley employees involved in the purchasing process shall not solicit or accept gifts, money, gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value, except unsolicited items or services of nominal value from vendors, prospective vendors, parties to subcontracts, or any other person or entity that receives, or may receive compensation for providing goods or performing services to Tindley. All Tindley purchasers shall review and comply with Tindley’s procedures for disclosing, reviewing, and addressing actual and potential conflicts of interest. III. PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES A. Procurement Procedure See chart at the end of document B. Bid Procedures All procurement shall be conducted in a manner that provides, to the maximum extent practical, a full and open competition. Tindley bid procedures should always follow local, state, and federal requirements. Procurement Processes should include the following: 1. Assemble a Procurement Committee consisting of the Network President, CFO, Grant Manager, and the requestor of the product or service. i. In the event that the requestor of the product or service is the Network President, a Tindley Board member of the applicable committee that corresponds to the request will be asked to participate. 2. Pre-Bid Phase. i. If an outside vendor is needed to develop the bid specifications for a bid project, the vendor, or related parties to the vendor cannot participate in the bid. ii. The procurement committee should have specific criteria of the bid specifications including how bids will be judged based on price, quality, experience of vendors, etc. iii. All solicitations shall incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for products or services to be procured. iv. Identify all requirements which offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids and proposals. v. If required by local, state, and or federal laws, Tindley should publicly announce in advance of projects that require a competitive bid process. vi. Vendors should not be allowed to interface with Tindley procurement committee members before any public bids are announced, and post-bid announcement, interactions should occur only as part of the formal bid process (questions and answers in writing, face-to-face walk-throughs, proposal phases, and actual bid submissions). 3. Bid Phase. i. All bidders should have adequate time to respond to a bid, including Q&A sessions, and a face-to-face walk-through if necessary. ii. The Tindley employee sending out bid packages including specifications, should not be the same person receiving the vendor bid submissions. iii. The Tindley employee receiving the bid submissions should time and date stamp each bid received and the committee should exclude any bids submitted after the bid deadline. iv. Tindley employees are forbidden to disclose to vendors information about other bidders, including bid proposal contents such as pricing. 4. Bid Selection Phase. i. The procurement committee should develop a bid template and checklist that ranks bids based on criteria developed by the committee and ensures bid procedures are followed. ii. If the procurement committee chooses the winning bid on criteria other than what is stated in the original specifications, the committee must document the reasons why. For example, if the winning bid was not the lowest price, the committee must justify in writing why the vendor was selected. C. Competition All procurement shall be conducted in a manner that provides, to the maximum extent practical, a full and open competition. 1. Procurements shall avoid noncompetitive practices that may restrict or eliminate competition, including but not limited to: a. Unreasonable qualification requirements. b. Unnecessary experience and excessive bonding requirements. c. Non-competitive pricing practices between firms or affiliated companies. d. Non-competitive contracts to consultants on retainer contracts e. Organizational conflicts of interest. f. Specifying “brand name” only instead of allowing “an equal to product.” 2. Procurements shall not intentionally split a single purchase into two or more separate purchases to avoid dollar thresholds that require more formal procurement methods. 3. Procurements shall include in any pre-qualified list an adequate number of current qualified vendors firms or products. 4. Procurements shall not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period. 5. Procurements shall not use any geographic preferences (state local or tribal) in the evaluation of bid proposals except where expressly mandated or encouraged by applicable federal statutes. 6. The procurement team must find, when possible, bidders to compete that were not provided by the Tindley requester. 7. The procurement committee must use independent judgment and notify the Board of Directors and ethics hotline if the requester of products or services is attempting to use undue influence for the team to select specific vendors. D. Considerations Tindley purchasers should take the following actions when procuring goods and services. 1. Conduct a lease versus purchase analysis when appropriate, including for property and large equipment. 2. Consolidate or break out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase if possible. 3. Use state and local intergovernmental or inter-entity agreements, or common or shared goods and services, where appropriate. 4. Use federal excess and surplus property in lieu of purchasing new equipment and property if it is feasible and reduces project costs. 5. Use time and materials contracts only if no other contract is suitable and the contract includes a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at their own risk. If such a contract is negotiated and awarded, Tindley must assert a high degree of oversight to obtain reasonable assurance that the contractor is using efficient methods and effective cost controls. IV. PROCUREMENT METHODS A. All procurements made under this policy shall: 1. Be necessary, at a reasonable cost, documented, not prohibited by law or the applicable funding source, and made in accordance with this policy. 2. Avoid acquiring unnecessary or duplicative items. 3. Engage responsible vendors who possess the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. 4. Tindley purchasers shall consider vendor integrity, public policy compliance, past performance record, and financial and technical resources. B. Procurement Parameters For all transactions, Tindley shall follow the applicable procurement method set forth in Appendix 1 C. Exceptions to Standards Methods Solicitation of a proposal from a single source may only be used if the following apply and are documented: 1. The item is only available from single source. 2. Public exigency or emergency will not permit any delay. 3. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through expressly authorizes the sole source in response to a Tindley request. 4. After soliciting a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. V. DOCUMENTATION A. Records Tindley shall maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include, but are not limited to: 1. A description and supporting documentation showing the rationale for the procurement method (e.g., cost estimates). 2. Selection of contract type. 3. Written price or rate quotations (such as catalog price, online price, e-mail or written quote), if applicable. 4. Copies of advertisements, requests for proposals, bid sheets or bid proposal packets. 5. Reasons for vendor selection or rejection, including Finance Committee and Board Minutes, rejection letters, and award letters. 6. And the basis for the contract price. VI. COMPLIANCE WITH THIS POLICY Program directors and, where applicable, the purchasing committee, shall maintain oversight to ensure that contractors and vendors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of contracts or purchase orders. Violations of this policy may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination. VII. VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA For vendors that have been selected in a competitive bid or that will provide critical services to the school, Tindley should evaluate them based on cost, quality, past performance, experience, and financial stability. Before providing services or products, the selected vendor can be asked to provide references, allow for background checks, and provide documentation such as certificate of insurance, certificate standing, adherence to anti-fraud policies, and contracts with right-toaudit clauses.
View Audit 317362 Questioned Costs: $1
Single Audit Reporting - MTE management concurs with the recommendation and will systematically implement monthly or quarterly reconciliations for significant balances. MTE management will continue to monitor grants and ensure timely reporting in the future. Responsible Official Laurie Reiter, Chief...
Single Audit Reporting - MTE management concurs with the recommendation and will systematically implement monthly or quarterly reconciliations for significant balances. MTE management will continue to monitor grants and ensure timely reporting in the future. Responsible Official Laurie Reiter, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date This finding will resolve as the chief financial officer and accountants prepare for the June 30, 2024 year end.
View Audit 317357 Questioned Costs: $1
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing Nos. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority implements controls to ensure that recertifications are uploaded to PIC in accordance with reporting requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement wit...
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing Nos. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority implements controls to ensure that recertifications are uploaded to PIC in accordance with reporting requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken or planned in response to finding: The HCVP shall recruit and hire a dedicated Data Analyst to oversee the PIC entries and to ensure that recertifications are uploaded in accordance with reporting requirements. The PIC uploads will be quality-controlled monthly by HCVP and quarterly by the Office of Audit and Compliance. The OAC will conduct monthly checks to ensure that the uploads are done to facilitate the required reporting. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Khaliah Payne. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 9/30/24.
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing Nos. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: We recommend management the Authority implements controls to ensure that transfers are not made out of the program. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Acti...
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing Nos. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: We recommend management the Authority implements controls to ensure that transfers are not made out of the program. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken or planned in response to finding: OFM leadership is updating the financial policies and procedures to include standard operating procedures (SOP) to accommodate the new Yardi financial software system. These SOPs will include a transfer of funds to the proper program process that will be implemented to ensure that the any fund transfer should be reviewed and approved by the financial managers. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Heather Mueller. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 09/30/2024.
View Audit 317348 Questioned Costs: $1
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing Nos. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority implements controls to ensure that files are maintained. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken or planned in response ...
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing Nos. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority implements controls to ensure that files are maintained. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken or planned in response to finding: The HCVP is implementing a monthly quality control protocol to review new applicant files for completeness. A new Program Director was assigned to oversee this quality control process. The Program Director will also monitor the new tenant checklist which will be created to ensure that all new tenant documentation is accurately maintained. The OAC shall monitor and collaborate with the HCVP to ensure that the checklist is accurate and available for auditing. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Starr Lane Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 7/31/24.
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing Nos. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority implements controls to ensure that the rent to the owner is reasonable in accordance with their administrative plan. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement w...
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing Nos. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority implements controls to ensure that the rent to the owner is reasonable in accordance with their administrative plan. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken or planned in response to finding: The HCVP hired a third-party vendor, AffordableHousing.com, to conduct all rent reasonableness of all housing units that are presented for leasing, to ensure that the rent to owner is reasonable and in accordance with the administrative plan. The OAC shall monitor the compliance monthly. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Ockeshia Pompey Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 7/31/24.
« 1 467 468 470 471 953 »