Audit 317429

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$5.42M
Findings
2
Programs
15
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-08-19
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
481400 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - E
1057842 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - E

Contacts

Name Title Type
NG4DRLEQ39J1 Lorelle Davies Auditee
4067563808 Barry Weber Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The College has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Flathead Valley Community College (the College) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Flathead Valley Community College, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the College
Title: NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The College has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient.
Title: NOTE 3 - INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The College has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. The College has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Direct Programs – Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing # –84.063 Student Financial Aid Cluster – Federal Pell Grant Program Eligible Expenses – Pell Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Criteria: Each year the U.S. Department of Education provides institutions with Payment and Disbursement Schedules for determining Pell awards. Based upon a student’s enrollment status, the maximum annual amount regarding a student’s Pell award is determined (34 CFR 690.62). Condition: During our testing of students that were disbursed Pell Grants, three students out of a total 40 that were tested did not receive the appropriate amount of Pell Grant. Cause: The University did not have adequate internal controls to ensure Pell awards agreed to the Payment and Disbursement Schedules. One of the cost of attendance amounts was incorrectly input for one specific category of students. Effect: Awards were not calculated correctly. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: A non-statistical sample of 40 students were selected for testing across all assistance programs. Detail of the sample and population of students are as follows: • Sample: 33 students who received Pell disbursements totaling $124,642 • Population: 426 student who received Pell disbursements totaling $1,617,040We identified three students in our sample of 40 who received Pell disbursements that did not match the payment schedule. Total underpayments to the three students was $429. After review of the population, we identified 28 students who received Pell disbursements that did not match the payment schedule. Total underpayments to the 28 students was $4,004. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: We recommend the College enhance internal controls to ensure Pell awards agree to the Payment and Disbursement Schedules. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Direct Programs – Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing # –84.063 Student Financial Aid Cluster – Federal Pell Grant Program Eligible Expenses – Pell Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Criteria: Each year the U.S. Department of Education provides institutions with Payment and Disbursement Schedules for determining Pell awards. Based upon a student’s enrollment status, the maximum annual amount regarding a student’s Pell award is determined (34 CFR 690.62). Condition: During our testing of students that were disbursed Pell Grants, three students out of a total 40 that were tested did not receive the appropriate amount of Pell Grant. Cause: The University did not have adequate internal controls to ensure Pell awards agreed to the Payment and Disbursement Schedules. One of the cost of attendance amounts was incorrectly input for one specific category of students. Effect: Awards were not calculated correctly. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: A non-statistical sample of 40 students were selected for testing across all assistance programs. Detail of the sample and population of students are as follows: • Sample: 33 students who received Pell disbursements totaling $124,642 • Population: 426 student who received Pell disbursements totaling $1,617,040We identified three students in our sample of 40 who received Pell disbursements that did not match the payment schedule. Total underpayments to the three students was $429. After review of the population, we identified 28 students who received Pell disbursements that did not match the payment schedule. Total underpayments to the 28 students was $4,004. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: We recommend the College enhance internal controls to ensure Pell awards agree to the Payment and Disbursement Schedules. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.