Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
64,113
In database
Filtered Results
6,191
Matching current filters
Showing Page
9 of 248
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Eligibility
Corrective Action Plan - Finding 2025-01: Non-Compliance with Federal Filing Deadlines To prevent a recurrence, Saints Joachim & Anne Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has updated its internal financial reporting calendar to include a "Hard Close" date for all audit activities. Effective immediately, ...
Corrective Action Plan - Finding 2025-01: Non-Compliance with Federal Filing Deadlines To prevent a recurrence, Saints Joachim & Anne Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has updated its internal financial reporting calendar to include a "Hard Close" date for all audit activities. Effective immediately, the Controller is required to initiate the upload of the Data Collection Form and all related financial statements to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse no later than September 15th of each year. This 15-day buffer will ensure that any technical difficulties with the FAC portal or administrative delays do not impact our compliance with federal reporting deadlines. Contact: Christine D'Ottavio, CFO Saints Joachim & Anne Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, 2720 Surf Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11224 Date: April 28, 2026
CASE FILE REVIEWS Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Grants to States for Medicaid (Medicaid Cluster) Assistance Listing Number: 93.778 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Human Services Pass-Through Numbers: 2505MN5ADM and 2505MN5MAP Award P...
CASE FILE REVIEWS Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Grants to States for Medicaid (Medicaid Cluster) Assistance Listing Number: 93.778 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Human Services Pass-Through Numbers: 2505MN5ADM and 2505MN5MAP Award Period: Year-Ended December 31, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Recommendation: It is recommended the County perform internal case file reviews and implement standard documentation that will formalize the performed reviews. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The County will add additional documentation and specific casefile reviews will be implemented. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action plan: Anne Lindseth, Health and Human Services Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2026
Program: Public Housing Operating Fund AL Number: 14.850 Finding Number: 2025-002 Audit Finding (Copied & Pasted Directly from Auditor’s Report): Condition: During the audit we observed documentation showing employees recording a full 8 hour work day on time sheets while leaving work early. Manageme...
Program: Public Housing Operating Fund AL Number: 14.850 Finding Number: 2025-002 Audit Finding (Copied & Pasted Directly from Auditor’s Report): Condition: During the audit we observed documentation showing employees recording a full 8 hour work day on time sheets while leaving work early. Management was instructed to cease tracking and compensate employees for full time anyway. Context: Employee(s) doing the following activities and still getting compensated for a full 8 hour work day; Employee(s) leaving their assigned worksite prior to the end of work day, employee(s) not calling off or leaving early for appointments without correctly calling off nor submitting the proper leave slips, employee(s) arriving late and leaving early daily. Cause: Management override and lack of monitoring/enforcement Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.430 Compensation - personal services, charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed Corrective Action to Be Taken: Reinstatement of accurate timekeeping with outlined policy and procedures including a discipline action plan for inaccurate payroll and leave slips submission. Strengthened controls and training; Support of management without overrides. Contact Responsible for Corrective Action: Gene Digennaro, Interim Executive Director PO Box 988 481 Neshannock Avenue New Castle, PA 16103 724-656-5100 ext. 204 gdigennaro@lawrencecountyha.com Tara Sheffler, Comptroller PO Box 988 481 Neshannock Avenue New Castle, PA 16103 724-656-5100 ext. 210 tsheffler@lawrencecountyha.com
Clinic management team acknowledges that from the audit selection made of 60 patients, 15 selections had findings. We agree with you that seven (7) of the 15 did not meet either, the six-month recertification requirements or had missing proof of income findings. We agree and are not contesting patie...
Clinic management team acknowledges that from the audit selection made of 60 patients, 15 selections had findings. We agree with you that seven (7) of the 15 did not meet either, the six-month recertification requirements or had missing proof of income findings. We agree and are not contesting patient selection numbers: 25, 27, 31, 38, 52, 56 and 59. We will address this in our corrective action plan. Staff have completed the six-month recertifications and gathered the missing income data Four (4) of the findings related to certification data being collected and uploaded in the hospital EPIC electronic medical records but were not formally signed by a case manager. We are in partial compliance with the data requirements, but we needed to finalize and ensure that controls are in place, so the service provider must sign the note. We had situations where the provider passed away or left the Peter Ho clinic, due to relocation. Staff have since completed the notes and we have developed a report within our EMR to notify the service provider that the note requires signature. The four missing signatures by the service provider were patient selections: 9, 24, 29, 41. Four (4) of the findings related to not having the original HIV diagnosis confirmed on the patient not successfully migrated into the new electronic medical record, EPIC. For three of these patients, the staff could not find the original HIV diagnosis on the chart. The patients were treated properly, but the original data was not retained. This was caused by not all data being successfully migrated when Peter Ho updated its EMR during CY 2021. The Peter Ho Clinic switched from Centricity to EPIC during 2021. The selected patients have been treated at Peter Ho prior to CY 2021. We did provide other supporting documentation that the patient has HIV, but we could not find the original documentation. The four patient selections that fell into this category are: 19, 30, 34 and 39. The corrective action plan as developed for CY 2024 will be continued to be reinforced and followed. A few new bullets have been added below to further assist in meeting the compliance guidance. A detailed plan of correction is identified below: • Quality management process, where Clinic clients are called ahead of time to notify them of their recertification requirements. This process will remain in place. • Assistant Manager will implement an EPIC (EMR) precheck process for current assessments. All future assessments will have proof of diagnosis, proof of income, proof of ID, proof of address and proof of insurance on the template to include the dates in which those documents were collected. (new) • Data Analyst(s) generate a report of patients due for recertification 60 days in advance of the due date. The CCC-Lead will remain directly accountable to review the progress of re-certifications. Further monitoring by the Assistant Manager of the clinic will continue. • An EPIC (EMR) report of unsigned encounters will be generated biweekly and reviewed by staff for open encounters and notes to be signed. (new) • The CCC-Lead and the Assistant Manager will continue to monitor retention of income verification documentation to ensure compliance purposes. • Document scanners will be provided to individual Certified Case Counselors to alleviate late or missed filings, documents will be scanned directly into EMR at the time of capture. • The Clinic staff will continue follow up with the patients that were non-compliant during the prior year audit and asked for the missing information. The medical record will be updated with any new information received. • Chart review for all upcoming appointments will be performed to capture/locate missing diagnosis because of data transfer failure from old EMR. If diagnosis is missing, rapid testing to be performed by the Counseling and Testing Department at that time to continue current treatment. (new) Contact Person: Mark Brown, Office Manager, Peter Ho Memorial Clinic Expected Completion Date: September 30, 2026
Condition: We tested forty fi les, thirty-five of which were Federal Direct Loan recipients, and two students received incorrect subsidized and unsubsidized loan amounts. We consider this to be an instance of non-compliance and is repeated from the prior year finding at 2024-004. Corrective Action P...
Condition: We tested forty fi les, thirty-five of which were Federal Direct Loan recipients, and two students received incorrect subsidized and unsubsidized loan amounts. We consider this to be an instance of non-compliance and is repeated from the prior year finding at 2024-004. Corrective Action Plan While this is listed as a repeat finding, the cause was different in that the condition occurred due to staff not using the student's remaining enrolled credits to correctly prorate aid for the final semester. The Financial Aid Office has reviewed this finding and implemented the following corrective measures: Process Improvement We have revised our procedures to require a mandatory review of remaining enrolled credits when it is determined that aid eligibility for any final period of enrollment is shorter than a full academic year. This ensures proration is calculated accurately in accordance with federal regulations. Staff Training All financial aid staff have received targeted training on proration requirements for shortened academic years, with an emphasis on using remaining enrolled credits in the calculation process. System and Manual Checks A secondary review step has been added to our awarding process. Any student identified as being in a final academic period will have their aid calculation reviewed and approved by a senior staff member prior to disbursement. Monitoring and Compliance We will conduct periodic internal audits of student files involving shortened academic years to ensure continued compliance. Any discrepancies identified will be corrected immediately and used as training opportunities. Responsible Person for Correction Action Plan: Alexis Brown, Director of Financial Aid Implementation Date for Corrective Action Plan: 03/25/26
Recommendation: We recommend the HRA implement controls over all areas of the federal program so that segregation of duties are in place and working. Views of Responsible Officials: The HRA is aware of the limited segregation of duties as a result of our limited number of staffing. There is no disag...
Recommendation: We recommend the HRA implement controls over all areas of the federal program so that segregation of duties are in place and working. Views of Responsible Officials: The HRA is aware of the limited segregation of duties as a result of our limited number of staffing. There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
The attorney responsible for the errors in two of the cases and the paralegal responsible for the other have received one-on-one instruction about these issues. In addition, the supervisor of the attorney who made two of the errors and compounded the problem by mistakenly issuing an asset waiver has...
The attorney responsible for the errors in two of the cases and the paralegal responsible for the other have received one-on-one instruction about these issues. In addition, the supervisor of the attorney who made two of the errors and compounded the problem by mistakenly issuing an asset waiver has received one-on-one instructions. The Compliance Office has provided in- person training on financial eligibility rules to the unit in which the attorney and supervisor errors occurred and is preparing to roll out short training videos on discrete parts of the financial eligibility process, including asset eligibility and asset waivers. In addition, the Compliance Office and the Citywide Director of Intake provide training to new staff and existing staff on financial eligibility throughout the year, including asset eligibility, documentation, and waivers.
The paralegal responsible for this error has received one-on-one training regarding correctly documenting financial override reasons and notes. The Compliance Office has provided in-person training on financial eligibility rules in the borough where this error occurred and is preparing to roll out s...
The paralegal responsible for this error has received one-on-one training regarding correctly documenting financial override reasons and notes. The Compliance Office has provided in-person training on financial eligibility rules in the borough where this error occurred and is preparing to roll out short training videos on discrete parts of the financial eligibility process (income overrides, assets and asset overrides, household numbers, etc.). In addition, the Compliance Office and the Citywide Director of Intake provide training to new staff and existing staff on financial eligibility throughout the year.
Identifying Number Finding No. 2025 001: Use of Incorrect Sliding Fee Schedule (SFS) in Determination of Sliding Fee Amount Finding Of the 26 patients selected for sliding fee discounts testwork, the audit noted 9 patients whereby the calculation of the sliding fee amount incorrectly utilized the 20...
Identifying Number Finding No. 2025 001: Use of Incorrect Sliding Fee Schedule (SFS) in Determination of Sliding Fee Amount Finding Of the 26 patients selected for sliding fee discounts testwork, the audit noted 9 patients whereby the calculation of the sliding fee amount incorrectly utilized the 2023 approved sliding fee schedule instead of the 2024 or 2025 sliding fee schedules, as applicable. This did not result an overcharge or undercharge to the patients. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned To minimize the likelihood of recurrence, management will implement a final sign-off step requiring review and approval by a manager or supervisor to confirm that the sliding fee schedule update has been successfully completed in the EPIC system. Additionally, management is coordinating with the EPIC Analyst to better understand the EPIC system configuration and update processes related to sliding fee schedule updates and ensure that future updates are properly applied and functioning as intended. Personnel responsible for implementation: Robert Young, VP Patient Financial Services Date of implementation: May 1, 2026
14.251 Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding, and Miscellaneous Grants Federal Grantor: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Internal Controls over Procurement, Suspension and Disbarment Criteria: Non-federal entities who receive federal grants may...
14.251 Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding, and Miscellaneous Grants Federal Grantor: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Internal Controls over Procurement, Suspension and Disbarment Criteria: Non-federal entities who receive federal grants may not contract with entities that are suspended, disbarred, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Condition: The Organization did not have controls in place to ensure vendors were eligible to receive federal awards. Cause: The Organization did not implement proper internal controls to verify that all contractors were eligible to participate in programs funded with Federal awards. Effect: Without proper internal controls, the Organization may not properly identify vendors that are ineligible to participate in federal contracts. Questioned Costs: None. Auditor’s Recommendation: We recommend policies and procedures be implemented related to suspension and disbarment whereby the Organization can identify any ineligible contractors prior to entering in to any contracts with vendors. View of Responsible Official: The Organization will implement appropriate policies and procedures related to suspension and disbarment as part of any future grant application and management process. We will identify ineligible contractors prior to entering into vendor agreements and will monitor existing contractors to ensure they have not become ineligible. A formal federal procedures policy is being implemented in 2026. Contact Person: Rhonda Adams Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2026
Finding Reference: 2025-004 Description of Finding: The Authority was unable to provide documentation to show income had been verified during reexamination for 3 tenants out of a sample of 40 tenants. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: The Authority agrees with the finding. Corrective Actio...
Finding Reference: 2025-004 Description of Finding: The Authority was unable to provide documentation to show income had been verified during reexamination for 3 tenants out of a sample of 40 tenants. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: The Authority agrees with the finding. Corrective Action: Staff will attend annual file compliance training and upcoming rent calculation training to reinforce documentation requirements and ensure accurate income determinations going forward. We have also updated our file checklists, staff are reviewing all tenant files and we have an internal file review process, as noted in Finding 2025-002, to help ensure staff obtain and maintain all required third-party documentation for income reexaminations Name of Contact Person: Curtis Lokey, Director of Finance, 423-752-4893, clokey@chahousing.org
Finding Reference: 2025-002 Description of Finding: The Authority was unable to provide all documents required to be maintained to determine eligibility. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: The Authority agrees with the finding. Corrective Action: We have updated our file checklists to bette...
Finding Reference: 2025-002 Description of Finding: The Authority was unable to provide all documents required to be maintained to determine eligibility. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: The Authority agrees with the finding. Corrective Action: We have updated our file checklists to better ensure that staff collect all required supporting documentation needed to determine eligibility during each reexamination. Staff received training on the new checklist format in late 2025 and have begun using the updated checklists. We are also reviewing all participant files to verify they are complete and compliant. In addition, we have an internal file review process that includes quality control reviews of a percentage of files at each site to help ensure required documentation is present and program requirements are being met. Staff will also attend annual file compliance training to reinforce documentation requirements and support continued compliance going forward.
Name of contact person: Renae Alston Corrective Action: The County will continue to train employees on a monthly basis and as needed when new and updated policies are received. Supervisors and lead workers will continue to conduct second party reviews and utilizing any findings to aid in training st...
Name of contact person: Renae Alston Corrective Action: The County will continue to train employees on a monthly basis and as needed when new and updated policies are received. Supervisors and lead workers will continue to conduct second party reviews and utilizing any findings to aid in training staff on any necessary policy information. The department will continue to implement changes as necessary to achieve the overall improvement of eligibility determinations. Proposed Completion Date: June 30, 2026
Condition: During testing of eligibility, 1 out of 40 students were not awarded their maximum subsidized loan amounts they should have been awarded. Views of Responsible Officials: AAC officials concur with the audit finding and acknowledge that one student did not receive the maximum subsidized loa...
Condition: During testing of eligibility, 1 out of 40 students were not awarded their maximum subsidized loan amounts they should have been awarded. Views of Responsible Officials: AAC officials concur with the audit finding and acknowledge that one student did not receive the maximum subsidized loan amount for which the student was eligible. The error resulted from an oversight during the financial aid packaging process and was not identified through the Academy's review procedures. Upon notification of the finding, the AAC reviewed the student's eligibility, recalculated the award, and initiated the appropriate corrective action to ensure the student received the correct subsidized loan amount, if still permissible under federal regulations. Management also reviewed its loan awarding procedures to identify opportunities to strengthen internal controls. Corrective Action Plan: To prevent similar occurrences, the AAC will implement an additional supervisory review of loan awards before disbursement, utilize system-generated eligibility reports to verify that students are awarded the maximum subsidized loan amount for which they qualify, and provide refresher training to financial aid staff on federal Direct Loan awarding requirements. Management believes these enhancements will improve the accuracy of loan packaging and reduce the likelihood of similar errors in future award years. Responsible Party: Executive Director of Administration and Finance Completion Date: The corrective action will be developed and implemented during the 2025-2026 fiscal year and will continue to be implemented in the 2026-2027 fiscal year.
Condition: During testing of Student Financial Assistance (SFA) eligibility and awarding, the Institution did not consistently apply federal requirements related to Cost of Attendance (COA), financial need determination, and award packaging. Specifically: • One student was awarded aid in excess of t...
Condition: During testing of Student Financial Assistance (SFA) eligibility and awarding, the Institution did not consistently apply federal requirements related to Cost of Attendance (COA), financial need determination, and award packaging. Specifically: • One student was awarded aid in excess of the federally allowable COA. • One student’s COA was overstated, which resulted in the student being potentially overawarded. • Six student’s were awarded the incorrect COA based on the grade level reported on the Institutional Student Information Record (ISIR). However, there is no code for year 4 on the ISIR, which resulted in the students receiving year 3 COA. • Two students received aid in excess of their calculated financial need, and the Institution did not maintain documentation supporting the adjustments or exceptions. • One student was enrolled at three quarter time during the fall semester and full time during the spring semester; however, the student received three quarter time Pell Grant disbursements for both semesters, resulting in an underpayment for the spring term and inaccurate Pell reporting. These errors demonstrate inconsistent application of federal awarding rules and insufficient review of eligibility and enrollment status changes. Views of Responsible Officials: AAC officials concur with the audit finding and acknowledge that the identified errors resulted from inconsistencies in the application of federal Student Financial Assistance awarding requirements and insufficient review of student eligibility, Cost of Attendance calculations, financial need determinations, and enrollment status changes. Management has reviewed each of the identified student files and is taking appropriate corrective action, including recalculating awards, making any required adjustments or corrections, and updating reporting where necessary. The AAC has also evaluated the circumstances surrounding the use of Cost of Attendance budgets, including the limitation of the Institutional Student Information Record (ISIR), which does not include a separate code for fourth-year undergraduate students. Procedures are being revised to ensure that staff apply the appropriate institutional Cost of Attendance budget regardless of the ISIR grade level code and that any manual adjustments are adequately documented. Corrective Action Plan: To strengthen internal controls, the AAC will implement enhanced review procedures for financial aid packaging, Cost of Attendance determinations, financial need calculations, enrollment status changes, and Pell Grant disbursements prior to disbursement. In addition, financial aid personnel will receive refresher training on federal awarding requirements, documentation standards, and exception processing. Management believes these corrective actions will improve compliance with federal regulations and reduce the likelihood of similar errors in future award years. Responsible Party: Executive Director of Administration and Finance Completion Date: The corrective action will be developed and implemented during the 2025-2026 fiscal year and will continue to be implemented in the 2026-2027 fiscal year.
Identifying Number: 2025-002: Documentation of Internal Controls Over Compliance Finding: We noted that controls identified by management over all material compliance requirements lack sufficient documentation to conclude application of controls is in place. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: Mana...
Identifying Number: 2025-002: Documentation of Internal Controls Over Compliance Finding: We noted that controls identified by management over all material compliance requirements lack sufficient documentation to conclude application of controls is in place. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: Management agrees with the finding and has implemented, or is in the process of implementing, the following corrective actions: 1. Development of Written Policies and Procedures • The Institute will perform a comprehensive review of all applicable Student Financial Assistance compliance requirements and develop formal written policies and procedures documenting the processes and controls for each material compliance area. Procedures will include the individual responsible, required documentation, review requirements, and retention standards. 2. Documentation of Internal Controls • Management will establish standardized control documentation requirements for all compliance activities. Evidence of review and approval will be maintained through signatures, initials, electronic approvals, checklists, reconciliations, or other documented support sufficient to demonstrate that controls were performed and reviewed. 3. Compliance Monitoring Checklists • The Institute will implement compliance monitoring checklists covering all direct and material compliance requirements identified in the audit, including: o Cash Management o Reporting o Student Eligibility o Student Disbursements o Credit Balance Processing o NSLDS Reporting o Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Information Security Requirements • The checklists will be completed and reviewed periodically to provide evidence of compliance and supervisory oversight. 4. Training and Cross-Training • Financial Aid and Administrative personnel will receive training on federal student aid compliance requirements, documentation expectations, and internal control responsibilities. Cross training will be performed to mitigate risks associated with employee turnover and ensure continuity of operations. 5. Management Review and Oversight • Management will implement periodic supervisory reviews of compliance activities and supporting documentation to verify controls operating as designed. Results of compliance monitoring activities and any identified deficiencies will be reported to senior administration, and corrective actions will be tracked to completion. 6. Annual Compliance Review • The Institute will conduct an annual review of Student Financial Assistance policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure continued compliance with Department of Education regulations, Uniform Guidance requirements, and changes in federal program requirements. Identifying Number: 2025-002: Documentation of Internal Controls Over Compliance (Continued) Responsible Officials: • Executive Vice President – Ariane Sweeney • Director of Financial Aid – Dr Thelbert Snowden • Controller/Outsourced Accounting Partner – YPTC Associates Melissa McGuire & Samantha Glass • Compliance and Information Security Personnel, as applicable Anticipated completion date: The written policies and procedures, compliance monitoring tools, and documentation standards will be fully implemented by December 31, 2026. Ongoing monitoring, training, and annual reviews will continue thereafter.
Under the state of Pennsylvania, contractors doing home repairs in excess of $5000 a year must register with the state of Pennsylvania and receive their Home Improvement Contractor Certification. Applications are reviewed by the Attorney General’s Office , anyone who is debarred is not issued and HI...
Under the state of Pennsylvania, contractors doing home repairs in excess of $5000 a year must register with the state of Pennsylvania and receive their Home Improvement Contractor Certification. Applications are reviewed by the Attorney General’s Office , anyone who is debarred is not issued and HIC Certification. In addition, the Program Director has a list of debarred contractors that he reviews periodically to ensure that contractors are not on the list. The organization will take the auditors recommendation of copying the debarred alphabetical page indicating that the contractor is not on the debarred or suspended listing and placing it in the contractors file. Responsible Individual: Energy Director Zack Porrecca and Housing Director Vickie Bucker Estimated Completion Date: September 30, 2026
2025-005 – Lack of Documentation for SAM.gov Exclusion Checks Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. Although the Organization has processes in place to cover these areas, and completes SAM.gov exclusion checks, the Organization did not retain documentation to support that the exclusion checks...
2025-005 – Lack of Documentation for SAM.gov Exclusion Checks Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. Although the Organization has processes in place to cover these areas, and completes SAM.gov exclusion checks, the Organization did not retain documentation to support that the exclusion checks were performed for vendors. As a result, there is no evidence that the Organization verified whether these parties were suspended or debarred prior to entering covered transactions. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend that the Organization retain evidence that SAM.gov exclusion checks are being completed for vendors to document that vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to entering covered transactions. Corrective Action. The Organization will begin retaining documentation for its SAM.gov exclusion checks that it completes for vendors to verify whether these parties were suspended or debarred prior to entering covered transactions. Responsible Person. Rob Rafson, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: December 2026
Condition Summary: The institution's procedures and controls for determining and reporting withdrawal dates to NSLDS were not operating effectively to ensure that the actual effective date of withdrawal was reported accurately and that enrollment status changes were reported timely. Of the forty stu...
Condition Summary: The institution's procedures and controls for determining and reporting withdrawal dates to NSLDS were not operating effectively to ensure that the actual effective date of withdrawal was reported accurately and that enrollment status changes were reported timely. Of the forty student records tested for NSLDS withdrawal reporting, we identified the following: • One student where the effective date of withdrawal was reported as the end of the semester rather than the student's actual withdrawal date. • Six students where the effective date of withdrawal was reported as the date the student was notified rather than the actual effective withdrawal date. • One student where the student's withdrawal was not reported timely and was not included on the first enrollment roster following the withdrawal. Management Response / Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with this finding. Turnover within the Financial Aid office resulted in a breakdown in the process for timely and accurate submission of reporting enrollment changes within NSLDS. Staff previously responsible for this function are no longer employed at the institution, and the engaged consulting firm has assumed interim responsibility for identifying enrollment status changes and completing NSLDS reporting within the required 60-day period. Responsible Party - Raymond Nault, Interim Director of Student Financial Services Title - Interim oversight: Engaged Consulting Firm Anticipated Completion Date - August 24, 2026 Note: Because the corrective actions described above were substantially implemented during and after the fiscal year 2025 audit period, management anticipates that this condition, or elements of it, may continue to be identified as a finding in the University's fiscal year 2025-2026 single audit. Full operating effectiveness of the revised controls will not be demonstrable until they have been in place for a complete testing cycle.
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Instance of Noncompliance: Meal Count Reporting and Reconciliation U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster Passed through State of lowa Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Number: 10.555, 10.559, 10.553 Feder...
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Instance of Noncompliance: Meal Count Reporting and Reconciliation U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster Passed through State of lowa Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Number: 10.555, 10.559, 10.553 Federal Award Year: 2025Criteria: Districts are required are required to submit accurate claims for reimbursement and maintain records supporting the number of meals claimed for reimbursement for the National School Lunch Program. Condition: During audit procedures over the School Nutrition Cluster, we identified multiple instances in the National School Lunch Program in which the number of claims submitted was incorrect. Cause: The District did not have an effective review and reconciliation control in place to compare meal-count support to the claim summary reports before reimbursement claims were submitted. In addition, meal-count and eligibility reports were not consistently generated and retained at the time the claims were prepared. As a result, subsequent changes in student eligibility status may have affected the reports available to support the meal counts claimed during the applicable reporting periods. Effect: Meal counts reported for reimbursement were not fully supported by contemporaneous records, resulting in noncompliance with reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Without an effective review and reconciliation control, errors in meal counts or claim summary reports may not be identified before reimbursement claims are submitted, increasing the risk that federal reimbursement claims could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs identified were below the reporting threshold and are not reported in this finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement a documented monthly review and reconciliation process before reimbursement claims are submitted. The reconciliation should compare meal-count and eligibility support to the claim summary reports, identify and explain any differences, retain support for adjustments, and include evidence of review and approval by an individual independent of claim preparation. We also recommend that management generate and retain meal-count and eligibility report for each applicable reporting period at the time claims are prepared to ensure support reflects student eligibility status as of the applicable claim period. Management Response: Management acknowledges the finding and the District will generate and retain monthly meal-count and eligibility reports at the time reimbursement claims are prepared. The District will also implement a documented review and reconciliation process for National School Lunch Program reimbursement claims.
Management has updated the policies and procedures manual to address this finding. For each housing unit, we are using the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUB) rent reasonableness form at lease signing. This form will be updated annually for each unit. We will also be following the HUD ...
Management has updated the policies and procedures manual to address this finding. For each housing unit, we are using the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUB) rent reasonableness form at lease signing. This form will be updated annually for each unit. We will also be following the HUD fair market rent determinations.
The Corporation screens applicants for eligibility by following the state of Indiana guidelines as provided through the INWIC system used to enter, track, and store information about applicants. Based on guidance contained in 7 CFR Section 246, states were encouraged to move to a paperless system. S...
The Corporation screens applicants for eligibility by following the state of Indiana guidelines as provided through the INWIC system used to enter, track, and store information about applicants. Based on guidance contained in 7 CFR Section 246, states were encouraged to move to a paperless system. Specifically, federal guidance contained in 7CFR 246.7 (i)(4) and (5)(i) outlines acceptable documentation to be included on certification forms as “a description of the document(s) used to determine residency and identity or a copy of the document(s) used or the applicant’s written statement when no documentation exists,” and “a description of the document(s) used to determine income eligibility or a copy of the document(s) in the file.” The State of Indiana has followed that guidance and does not require the Corporation to retain copies of the WIC applicant’s proof of eligibility. Therefore, the auditors were not able to test internal controls over compliance or compliance over the eligibility compliance requirement through re-performance and have issued a qualified opinion based on the scope limitations. Compliance with State of Indiana participant eligibility requirements is the responsibility of Rebecca Lies, WIC Coordinator. As the Corporation follows the State of Indiana’s paperless system as described above, no further corrective action will be taken.
REACH has policies in place to ensure recertifications and income verification are performed timely, tenant eligibility is correctly determined, and the tenant files are properly maintained. During the second quarter of 2026, REACH outsourced property management and compliance functions to a third-p...
REACH has policies in place to ensure recertifications and income verification are performed timely, tenant eligibility is correctly determined, and the tenant files are properly maintained. During the second quarter of 2026, REACH outsourced property management and compliance functions to a third-party management company to address the outstanding compliance issues.
REACH’s 2024 consolidated audit report was issued in mid-November 2025. REACH Compliance Management reviewed the Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) Housing Trust Fund (HTF) program manual and did not find any specific requirements about certifications other than at move-in. REACH reached o...
REACH’s 2024 consolidated audit report was issued in mid-November 2025. REACH Compliance Management reviewed the Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) Housing Trust Fund (HTF) program manual and did not find any specific requirements about certifications other than at move-in. REACH reached out to OHCS and did not receive any clarifications. REACH operated with the available guidance for HTF at the time. OHCS have since updated the HTF manual as of June 2026. REACH now have an updated HTF manual which outlines when full recertification with income verifications are required and will follow those rules going forward.
Once REACH Asset Management Team was notified of this audit finding, our Asset Management team communicated this finding to Ad-West. They would set up a new process to ensure the reporting of HOME units, HOME unit types, and compliance would be met on all HOME units.
Once REACH Asset Management Team was notified of this audit finding, our Asset Management team communicated this finding to Ad-West. They would set up a new process to ensure the reporting of HOME units, HOME unit types, and compliance would be met on all HOME units.
« 1 7 8 10 11 248 »