Audit 377334

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$101.47M
Findings
3
Programs
31
Organization: City Colleges of Chicago (IL)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-23
Auditor: RSM US LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1166261 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes N
1166262 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1166263 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.063 FEDERAL PELL GRANT PROGRAM $77.01M Yes 1
84.268 FEDERAL DIRECT STUDENT LOANS $4.65M Yes 1
84.007 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANTS $1.93M Yes 0
84.033 FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM $1.47M Yes 0
84.002 ADULT EDUCATION - BASIC GRANTS TO STATES $1.33M Yes 0
84.042 TRIO STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES $855,372 Yes 0
16.525 GRANTS TO REDUCE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, DATING VIOLENCE, SEXUAL ASSAULT, AND STALKING ON CAMPUS $766,000 Yes 0
84.425 EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND $535,466 Yes 0
12.006 NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM $517,554 Yes 0
84.116 FUND FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION $506,071 Yes 0
93.600 HEAD START $493,515 Yes 0
20.205 HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION $419,204 Yes 0
16.575 CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE $387,464 Yes 0
81.117 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY INFORMATION DISSEMINATION, OUTREACH, TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS/ASSISTANCE $378,893 Yes 0
84.044 TRIO TALENT SEARCH $327,013 Yes 0
84.066 TRIO EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY CENTERS $289,543 Yes 0
47.076 STEM EDUCATION (FORMERLY EDUCATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES) $282,763 Yes 0
11.307 ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE $230,241 Yes 0
84.031 HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL AID $213,303 Yes 1
10.558 CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM $158,480 Yes 0
93.243 SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES PROJECTS OF REGIONAL AND NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE $112,959 Yes 0
17.274 YOUTHBUILD $106,685 Yes 0
84.048 CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION -- BASIC GRANTS TO STATES $94,556 Yes 0
81.049 OFFICE OF SCIENCE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $43,317 Yes 0
93.732 MENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH EDUCATION AND TRAINING GRANTS $38,342 Yes 0
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $28,105 Yes 0
93.969 PPHF GERIATRIC EDUCATION CENTERS $24,676 Yes 0
45.162 PROMOTION OF THE HUMANITIES TEACHING AND LEARNING RESOURCES AND CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT $18,717 Yes 0
93.113 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH $17,747 Yes 0
93.859 BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND RESEARCH TRAINING $13,477 Yes 0
93.575 CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT $3,309 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
L3EXK4J98JQ1 Jolenna Nanalig Auditee
3125533345 Kelly Kirkman Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

City Colleges of Chicago, Community College District No. 508 (City Colleges) is a separate taxing body created under the Illinois Public Community College Act of 1965, with boundaries coterminous with the City of Chicago. City Colleges delivers educational and student services through seven colleges, each of which is separately accredited by the North Central Association. The seven colleges are Richard J. Daley College, Harold Washington College, Kennedy-King College, Malcolm X College, Olive-Harvey College, Harry S. Truman College, and Wilbur Wright College. The Board of Trustees, appointed by the Mayor of the City of Chicago and ratified by the City Council of Chicago, is responsible for establishing the policies and procedures by which City Colleges is governed. The U.S. Department of Education has been designated as the City Colleges’ cognizant agency for the audit performed in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Fiscal period audited: Single Audit testing procedures were performed for program transactions that occurred during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.
Basis of accounting: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of City Colleges under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025, and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of City Colleges, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position changes in net position, or cash flows of City Colleges.
Cost allocation: City Colleges has a plan for allocation of common and indirect costs related to grant programs in accordance with the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. The indirect cost rate used to allocate amounts to grant programs during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, is primarily based on a federally negotiated higher education rate agreement of 53%. Because City Colleges negotiated an indirect cost rate, it cannot elect to use the 10% de minimis rate for awards prior to October 1, 2024 nor the 15% de minimis rate for awards after October 1, 2024 as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Loans made under the Federal Direct Student Loan program (Assistance Listing Number 84.268) issued to eligible students of the City Colleges during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, are summarized as follows: Guaranteed Loan Programs: Subsidized $ 2,244,075 Unsubsidized 2,409,649 Total Federal Student Loan Programs $ 4,653,724 The loan programs include subsidized and unsubsidized loans. The value of loans issued for the Federal Student Loan Program is based on disbursement amounts. The loan amounts issued during the year are disclosed on the schedule. City Colleges is responsible only for the performance of certain administrative duties with respect to the federally guaranteed student loan programs and, accordingly, balances and transactions relating to these loan programs are not included in City Colleges’ basic financial statements. Therefore, it is not practicable to determine the balance of loans outstanding to students and former students of the City Colleges at June 30, 2025.
No federal insurance was received by City Colleges during the year ended June 30, 2025.

Finding Details

Finding 2025-002 – Return of Title IV Funds Repeat Finding: No Federal Program Title – U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Pell Grant: 84.063 Federal Award Year 2024-2025 Award Number: P063P Condition For one out of forty students tested, City Colleges properly recalculated a return of Title IV funds for a student but did not subsequently adjust the student's account to perform the return or notify the student of the adjusted award amount. Criteria Per 34 CFR 668.22, the institution must return, the lesser of—(i) The total amount of unearned title IV assistance to be returned as calculated or an amount equal to the total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period or period of enrollment multiplied by the percentage of title IV grant or loan assistance that has not been earned by the student. An institution must return the amount of title IV funds for which it is responsible as soon as possible but no later than 45 days after the date of the institution's determination that the student withdrew. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that returns are properly adjusted to students' accounts to ensure funds are returned to the Department of Education timely. Questioned Costs Actual questioned costs total $1,192. Based on our sample results, estimated likely questioned costs total $123,879. Cause The lack of return of Title IV funds was an oversight due to human error. Context Infrequent. One out of forty students (2.5%) selected for testing. Effect Failure to return funds to the Department of Education can result in excess cash or loss of future funding. Recommendation We recommend City Colleges enhance monitoring procedures to ensure that returns of federal funds are completed after return of Title IV calculations are performed. Views of responsible officials We agree with this finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2025-001 – Direct Loan Disbursement Notifications Repeat Finding: No Federal Program Title – U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Direct Student Loans: 84.268 Federal Award Year 2024-2025 Award Number: P268K Condition During our testing over direct loan disbursement notifications, we found that for twenty out of twenty students tested, City Colleges could not provide evidence that notifications were sent within the required timeframe informing the student, or parent, that a credit will be made to the student’s account for a direct loan disbursement. While City Colleges demonstrated that its system was configured to automatically send notification letters and confirmed that notifications were issued, City Colleges could not provide documentation showing the specific date each notification was sent in relation to the loan disbursement. Criteria 34 CFR 668.165 requires institutions who credit a student's account with a direct loan disbursement must notify the student, or parent, in writing of the (1) the date and amount of the disbursement; (2) the student's right, or parent's right, to cancel all or a portion of that loan or loan disbursement and have the proceeds returned..; and (3) the procedure and time by which the student or parent must notify the institution that he or she wishes to cancel the loan. 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures in place to ensure there is a sufficient audit trail of direct loan disbursement notifications. Questioned Costs None. Cause City Colleges’ system is designed to record the date notifications are sent to students; however, it does not retain a copy of the actual notification content that was transmitted. Context Frequent. Twenty out of twenty students (100%) selected for testing. Effect Failure to maintain documentation of the notifications sent to students regarding their direct loan disbursements may prevent students from exercising their right to cancel awards within the allowable timeframe. This constitutes noncompliance with federal regulations and could jeopardize City Colleges’ eligibility for future funding. Recommendation We recommend City Colleges enhance its system to retain both the date of the notification and a copy of the actual notification sent to students. Views of responsible officials We agree with this finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2025-003 – Reporting Repeat Finding: No Federal Program Title – U.S. Department of Education Higher Education Institutional Aid 84.031C Federal Award Year 2024-2025 Award Number: 21061-210822-1-HWC Pass-Through Entity: Northeastern Illinois University Condition For one of the four reports tested for the Higher Education Institutional Aid Program, City Colleges did not timely submit a quarterly report to the Pass-Through Entity (PTE). A quarterly performance report was due on May 1, 2025 and submitted 14 days late on May 15, 2025. Criteria Per the terms of the PTE's annual Subaward Agreement, City Colleges is required to submit quarterly reports along with annual performance reports. Quarterly reports are required to be submitted within 30 days of the period end. 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls deigned to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures in place to ensure timely reporting of required performance reports. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs related to testing of reporting. Cause Submission delay was the result of poor time management and breakdowns in communication between PIs and the grantor. Context Frequent. One out of four reports (25%) selected for testing. Effect Failure to submit reports timely is noncompliance with the requirements of the grant award and could result in loss of funding or other penalties. Recommendation We recommend City Colleges implement monitoring procedures to ensure that reports are submitted in a timely manner. Views of responsible officials We agree with this finding. See corrective action plan.