Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
57,700
In database
Filtered Results
9,952
Matching current filters
Showing Page
8 of 399
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Corrective Action Plan – Material Weakness & Material Noncompliance (Single Audit) Entity Name: Froedtert ThedaCare Health (FTCH) Corrective Action Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 Finding 2025-001 – Material Noncompliance (Major Federal Program) Federal Program U.S. Department of Health...
Corrective Action Plan – Material Weakness & Material Noncompliance (Single Audit) Entity Name: Froedtert ThedaCare Health (FTCH) Corrective Action Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 Finding 2025-001 – Material Noncompliance (Major Federal Program) Federal Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – National Institutes of Health (NIH) – Cancer Control ALN: 93.399 Finding Description The audit identified material weakness and material noncompliance with federal program requirements related to payroll, fringe benefits and indirect costs. Specifically, FTCH did not comply with NIH Salary Cap requirements, which resulted in questioned costs that were quantitatively and qualitatively material. Cause of the Finding FTCH did not apply the NIH salary cap limitations correctly during the period under review. Corrective Action Planned • The Entity will take the following corrective actions to address the material noncompliance:  Performing a comprehensive review of all FTCH grants, both under consideration and currently active, to determine whether a salary cap limitation applies. Where applicable, management will confirm that the salary cap is being consistently and accurately applied in accordance with governing requirements. Any discrepancies identified have been or will be corrected in a timely manner.  Enhancing pre-award and pre-submission compliance controls through updates to grant review procedures and compliance checklists. These updates are designed to ensure that grants subject to salary cap limitations are clearly flagged and that salary calculations are reviewed and documented prior to submission and award acceptance.  Providing targeted training for staff involved in grant administration, budgeting, payroll processing, and financial reporting to ensure consistent understanding and application of salary cap requirements and related internal control procedures.  Conducting periodic internal monitoring reviews of salary charges to federal awards to assess ongoing compliance, validate the effectiveness of internal controls, and identify potential issues before they result in noncompliance. Results of these reviews will be documented, and corrective actions implemented as appropriate. Personnel Responsible: SVP Finance Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2026 Status of Corrective Action Corrective action has been initiated and will be completed within the stated timeframe. Management Certification Management certifies that the corrective actions described above are accurate, appropriate, and will be implemented as represented. ____________________ Matt Partridge SVP Finance April ___, 2026
This finding is due to the Township not having formal written policies in place required by Uniform Guidance. The Township is now aware that these policies are required and will adopt all necessary policies. The Township does not believe that there were any actual nonallowable costs or transactions ...
This finding is due to the Township not having formal written policies in place required by Uniform Guidance. The Township is now aware that these policies are required and will adopt all necessary policies. The Township does not believe that there were any actual nonallowable costs or transactions because of the lack of written policies as required by Uniform Guidance. The Township will adopt all necessary policies to be in compliance. The person responsible for the corrective action is the Supervisor. The anticipated completion date of the corrective action plan is before the end of the 2026 fiscal year. The plan for adherence is that the Board will review all proposed policies and adopt them, the Board will also monitor any changes to policy requirements to ensure that they are in compliance in the future.
Corrective Action: LSA will provide training to the appropriate departments and individuals to reinforce disbursement and purchase order policies and procedures within 30 days of the audit submission. Additionally, LSA will provide training to employees emphasizing the organizational policies requir...
Corrective Action: LSA will provide training to the appropriate departments and individuals to reinforce disbursement and purchase order policies and procedures within 30 days of the audit submission. Additionally, LSA will provide training to employees emphasizing the organizational policies requiring employee certification of their payroll timesheets. This change will be made within the next 90 days. Contact Person: George Fort, Director of Finance, (334) 223-0251; gfort@alsp.org
Finding: 2025-081 - During inquiries with management the University of Alaska identified multiple students during enrollment verification process that they determined were fictious. Questioned Costs: AL 84.007: 4,947, AL 84.063: 27,059, AL 84.268: 158,554 Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 84.268 84....
Finding: 2025-081 - During inquiries with management the University of Alaska identified multiple students during enrollment verification process that they determined were fictious. Questioned Costs: AL 84.007: 4,947, AL 84.063: 27,059, AL 84.268: 158,554 Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 84.268 84.007, 84.033 Assistance Listing Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster (SFAC) Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The university has been actively implementing process improvements across all campuses (UAF, UAA and UAS) to strengthen controls and prevent similar occurrences. Enhancements to the existing processes include the deployment of multilayered interim screening measures to mitigate fraudulent accounts and strengthen internal controls. In addition, the University has acquired a long-term software solution which is currently in the final phase of implementation, to further enhance identity verification procedures and strengthen cybersecurity capabilities. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): May 31, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Amanda Wall, AVC, UAF Financial Services, 907-474-7552
Finding: 2025-033 - DMVA staff did not document a risk assessment for two Disaster Grants subrecipients. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Assistance Listing Title: Disaster Grants COVID- 19 Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the...
Finding: 2025-033 - DMVA staff did not document a risk assessment for two Disaster Grants subrecipients. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Assistance Listing Title: Disaster Grants COVID- 19 Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): DMVA concurs with the finding Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Homeland Security Director will conduct a thorough review of the documented sub-recipient risk assessment process to ensure that adequate review at the supervisor’s level complies with 2 CFR 200.332. Necessary updates to pertinent forms and manuals will be made to reflect federal requirements. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): October 31, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Bryan Fisher
Finding: 2025-030 - A review of 17 FY 25 Disaster Grants payments found that 15 payments - (88 percent) lacked adequate supporting documentation. Questioned Costs: Indeterminate Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Assistance Listing Title: Disaster Grants COVID- 19 Views of Responsible Officials (stat...
Finding: 2025-030 - A review of 17 FY 25 Disaster Grants payments found that 15 payments - (88 percent) lacked adequate supporting documentation. Questioned Costs: Indeterminate Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Assistance Listing Title: Disaster Grants COVID- 19 Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): DMVA concurs with the finding Corrective Action (corrective action planned to ensure compliance with federal regulations and effective management of federal awards, the Finance Office, in conjunction with the Homeland Security Director, will develop and implement written procedures that provide a clear framework for managing federal awards and ensure compliance with federal regulations. DMVA will: • Clearly outline federal requirements under 2 CFR 200.327, 2 CFR 200.403(g), and Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation Class Deviation 15-01. • Specify the documentation required to support reimbursement requests, including expectations related to discrepancies and follow-up actions. • Outline the procedures for Homeland Security for reviewing and certifying work completed by contractors, where applicable, prior to reimbursement to subrecipients. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): October 31, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Bryan Fisher
Finding: 2025-056 - Sixty Medicaid and sixty CHIP recipients were randomly selected for eligibility testing. Testing revealed the following errors: Medicaid five of 60 cases lacked eligibility determination issues (note, some case had multiple deficiencies): • One of sixty case files lacked the prop...
Finding: 2025-056 - Sixty Medicaid and sixty CHIP recipients were randomly selected for eligibility testing. Testing revealed the following errors: Medicaid five of 60 cases lacked eligibility determination issues (note, some case had multiple deficiencies): • One of sixty case files lacked the proper case notes to properly maintain how the individual was determined eligible for payments. • One of sixty cases had an incorrect social security number entered into the ARIES system. In addition: • Five of sixty files lacked documentation of facts supporting the eligibility determination. • One of sixty participants did not meet income eligibility requirements. • Two of sixty cases lacked documentation to verify that the Income and Eligibility Verification System (IEVS) was used to verify income eligibility. CHIP 17 of 60 cases lacked eligibility: determination issues, (note, some case had multiple deficiencies). • One of sixty case files was missing a: CHIP-specific application that was signed of by the program recipient. • Three of the sixty identified cases had identified income that exceeded income limits or income was unable to be verified. • Four of sixty cases lacked documentation to verify that the Income and Eligibility Verification System was used, to verify income eligibi1ity. • Three of sixty cases were not properly closed after the period of eligibility to receive benefits had ended. • Four of sixty cases that had payments to programs participants that were deemed unallowable costs activities due to-multiple individual compliance issues. • Sixteen of sixty cases lacked adequate support for eligibility determinations/redeterminations. Questioned Costs: AL 93.778: 138 (known questioned costs); 37,006,989 (likely questioned costs), AL 93.767: 288 (known questioned costs); 582,269 (likely questioned costs) Assistance Listing Number: 93.767, 93.775, 93.777, 93.778 Assistance Listing Title: CHIP Medicaid Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding but does not concur with the questioned costs. CMS has notified the state that financial recoveries based on eligibility errors can only be pursued when identified by programs operating under CMS’ Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) program, under section 1903(u) of the Social Security Act and regulations at 42 CFR Part 431, Subpart Q. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Public Assistance will continue to perform case reviews and will randomly sample eligibility determinations to identify error trends and improve training opportunities. Case reviews that specifically target income and case documentation will be performed. The division will broadly message case documentation expectations as well as review in individual office meetings. The division will analyze its case documentation protocols and update them as necessary to ensure all relevant documentation supporting eligibility decisions are present in electronic case files. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2027. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding No. 2025-071 - Deficiencies were identified in the Office of Children’s Services FY25 foster care base rate setting methodology. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): DFCS disagrees with this fin...
Finding No. 2025-071 - Deficiencies were identified in the Office of Children’s Services FY25 foster care base rate setting methodology. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): DFCS disagrees with this finding. DFCS evaluated two foster care base rate proposals using the established Hornsby Zeller Methodology. The first option applied the traditional methodology and the second followed the same structure but incorporated Urban West regional expenditure data, which includes Alaska and eleven other western states as well as Hawaii. This change was implemented because Urban West data more accurately reflects Alaska’s high cost of living environment, whereas reliance on national averages has historically produced rates below Alaska’s true cost of care. Both options were reviewed with departmental legal counsel, who were involved in the original settlement, division leadership and the Commissioner’s Office. DFCS advanced the second option, resulting in an approximate 3000 increase to foster care base rate stipends effective July 1,2025. DFCS disagrees with the conclusion that the cost-of-living (inflation) factor should be adjusted to include inflation from 2016 forward. When the 2018 Foster Care Base Rates were established, inflation up to that point was already incorporated into the rate calculation. The current rate-setting process correctly used the 2018 rates as the baseline, which already accounted for prior inflation. Adding inflation from 2016 again would result in double-counting. DFCS disagrees with the conclusion that the rate-setting process did not follow the Hornsby Zeller methodology. The methodology was followed in full. As part of the rate analysis, DFCS applied the national average cost-of-living factor as outlined; however, the resulting amount did not adequately meet the needs of the children under the care and responsibility of the Department. DFCS is fiduciarily required to ensure that rates are sufficient to meet the actual needs of children in out-of-home care, and the national average input did not satisfy that obligation. To ensure the methodology produced accurate and appropriate results, DFCS utilized the Urban West index, an allowable and geographically relevant data source under the methodology. This adjustment did not change the methodology itself it refined the underlying input to better reflect Alaska’s actual cost of living and support the intended purpose of the rate-setting process. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): DFCS will continue to consult with legal counsel regarding any future methodology changes and will follow all guidance provided. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): DFCS considers this matter resolved. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Nancy Miller, Finance Officer
Finding No. 2025-070 - An evaluation of the Office of Children’s Services (OCS) Online Resources for the Children of Alaska (ORCA) system controls identified an internal control weakness. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree,...
Finding No. 2025-070 - An evaluation of the Office of Children’s Services (OCS) Online Resources for the Children of Alaska (ORCA) system controls identified an internal control weakness. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): DFCS agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): OCS will be making modifications to the ORCA system that will automatically deactivate any user who has not logged in within 30 days during the ORCA update on 4 16 2026. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): DFCS anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Nancy Miller, Finance Officer
Finding: 2025-023 - The Coordinated Early Intervening Services budgets for two Local Education Agencies exceeded the allowable federal limit. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Assistance Listing Title: Special Education Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whe...
Finding: 2025-023 - The Coordinated Early Intervening Services budgets for two Local Education Agencies exceeded the allowable federal limit. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Assistance Listing Title: Special Education Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with Finding 2025-023. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): DEED is awaiting guidance from the U.S. Department of Education (U.S. ED) to determine what action should be taken to correct the FY2025 issue. The GMS controls have been updated for FY2026 to prevent the issue from recurring. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): Unknown dependent on U.S.ED Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Deborah Riddle, Division Operations Manager, Division of Innovation & Education Excellence
Finding: 2025-028 - One of 10 employee timesheets tested did not support the charges billed to the Congressionally Mandated Projects (CMP) program. Questioned Costs: 2,273 Assistance Listing Number: 66.202 Assistance Listing Title: CMP Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees...
Finding: 2025-028 - One of 10 employee timesheets tested did not support the charges billed to the Congressionally Mandated Projects (CMP) program. Questioned Costs: 2,273 Assistance Listing Number: 66.202 Assistance Listing Title: CMP Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): This finding has been corrected. The Division of Community and Regional Affairs (DCRA) and the Division of Administrative Services (DAS) have reviewed and updated timesheet processing functions in DCRA. DAS has provided information and training to DCRA timekeepers and management staff on timesheet entry, timekeeping procedures, and time entry and review processes in the accounting system. Both DCRA and DAS management will continue to monitor time entry and timesheet processing to ensure that time is entered accurately. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): I The corrective action plan was fully implemented on January 31, 2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Nichole Tham, Division Operations Manager, Division of Community and Regional Affairs.
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-068 - For two out of 40 timesheets tested (five percent), the employees’ hours were inaccurately recorded in the State’s accounting system. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain w...
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-068 - For two out of 40 timesheets tested (five percent), the employees’ hours were inaccurately recorded in the State’s accounting system. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): I The department agrees with this finding and recommendation. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): Department management will implement additional training for time collectors and payroll entry staff and strengthen the review process to ensure the accuracy of timesheet entry moving forward. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): June 30, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Shanna Burns, Human Resources Consultant 5
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-063 - Three of 40 timesheets tested (eight percent) were entered into the State’s accounting system with incorrect coding. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The departme...
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-063 - Three of 40 timesheets tested (eight percent) were entered into the State’s accounting system with incorrect coding. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding and recommendation. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The department will reinforce timesheet entry and processing procedures, and the finance officer will provide additional training to administrative staff to avoid future errors. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): June 30, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Michael White, Financial Services Manager
Finding: 2025-072 - Alaska Energy Authority did not have controls in place for review of progress reports for this program. During our testing of reports, we noted that two of the five reports sampled did not have evidence of a formal review before submission. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listi...
Finding: 2025-072 - Alaska Energy Authority did not have controls in place for review of progress reports for this program. During our testing of reports, we noted that two of the five reports sampled did not have evidence of a formal review before submission. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.859 Assistance Listing Title: Assistance to High Energy Cost Rural Communities Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): Agree Corrective Action (corrective action planned): Implement procedures to ensure that all compliance reports are reviewed by personnel independent of the preparer(s). Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): 01/15/2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Tim Sandstrom, Chief Operating Officer
Finding: 2025-050 - Daily SNAP EBT reconciliations were not performed in FY 25. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, bri...
Finding: 2025-050 - Daily SNAP EBT reconciliations were not performed in FY 25. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Public Assistance implemented a daily reconciliation and monitoring process and trained staff on the revised procedures. The division plans to be fully compliant and current in FY 2026. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding: 2025-049 - DOH’s information technology staff did not properly limit user access to EIS during FY25. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the...
Finding: 2025-049 - DOH’s information technology staff did not properly limit user access to EIS during FY25. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Public Assistance will revise and strengthen the EIS account reconciliation process to include a change in cadence and update protocols for sponsored accounts. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding: 2025-048 - Testing of 72 FY 25 SNAP EBT issuances found two automated EIS benefit calculations that did not consider an increase in unearned income related to Alaska’s Senior Benefits Program. Questioned Costs: AL 10.551: 660 Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Titl...
Finding: 2025-048 - Testing of 72 FY 25 SNAP EBT issuances found two automated EIS benefit calculations that did not consider an increase in unearned income related to Alaska’s Senior Benefits Program. Questioned Costs: AL 10.551: 660 Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Senior Benefits Program encountered a one-time mass change that did not result in an update on all affected cases. The Division of Public Assistance will correct the affected claims and refund associated Questioned Costs: The division will also review mass change protocols with leadership to ensure proper implementation to mitigate recurrence of resulting errors. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding: 2025-047 - The amount of FY 25 SNAP benefits reported to United States Department of Agriculture as issued by the State’s Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) contractor, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), was 1,235,577 more than the amount of authorized benefits reported in data f...
Finding: 2025-047 - The amount of FY 25 SNAP benefits reported to United States Department of Agriculture as issued by the State’s Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) contractor, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), was 1,235,577 more than the amount of authorized benefits reported in data from the Division of Public Assistance’s Eligibility Information System (EIS). Furthermore, FIS could not provide a reliable audit trail of issuances. Questioned Costs: AL 10.551: 1,235,577 Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding but does not concur with the questioned costs. The Division of Public Assistance completes reconciliations between FIS daily transaction records and EBT Account Management Agent (AMA) data to ensure issuance accuracy. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): A workgroup identified the root causes of the discrepancies. A revised reporting process is being implemented to ensure all EBT payments are accurately captured, improving completeness and accuracy Daily reconciliations are now in place to support ongoing accuracy and reduce reliance on ad hoc reporting. As a result, the report previously developed for this audit by the EBT contractor, FIS, is not expected to be needed moving forward. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Title II, Part A-Supporting Effective Instruction Stat Grants – Assistance Listing No. 84.367 Special Education Cluster (IDEA programs) – Assistance Listing No. 84.027, 84.173 Title I-A-Grants to Local Educational Agencies – Assistance Listing No. 84.010 Recommendation: The District should design an...
Title II, Part A-Supporting Effective Instruction Stat Grants – Assistance Listing No. 84.367 Special Education Cluster (IDEA programs) – Assistance Listing No. 84.027, 84.173 Title I-A-Grants to Local Educational Agencies – Assistance Listing No. 84.010 Recommendation: The District should design and implement controls to ensure semi-annual time and effort certification are obtained and reviewed timely. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: To address the material weakness related to untimely and incomplete approval of Time and Effort certifications, MPS implemented process improvements to strengthen internal controls, increase accountability, and ensure certifications are completed prior to reimbursement submissions. MPS performed the following with respect to enhancing the internal controls surrounding this process: Prior to Collection • Adjusted certification timelines to allow adequate review and approval, • Established centralized email account to improve communication reliability, • Reassigned responsibility to the ESEA Manager for stronger oversight, • Beginning FY26, implemented a monthly grant report to monitor expenditures and detect and correct errors in a timely manner, • Communicated certification timelines to district leadership in advance of the collection window. During Collection • Sent daily communications and district-wide reminders, • Monitored completion through daily reporting, • Provided real-time technical support. Post Collection Window • Continued system-generated reminders, • Conducted targeted outreach via email, phone, and virtual meetings, as appropriate, • Launched a formal escalation process through supervisory channels when needed as described in our communications outlined above. These actions are supported by documented procedures and enhanced oversight to ensure timely completion of certifications and compliance with federal cost requirements. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: State and Federal Program Director, ESEA Coordination and Compliance Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Completed as of December 2025.
Special Education Cluster (IDEA programs) – Assistance Listing No. 84.027, 84.170 Recommendation: The District should implement controls that allow for the identification and proper classification of vendor payments to applicable grant period. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is...
Special Education Cluster (IDEA programs) – Assistance Listing No. 84.027, 84.170 Recommendation: The District should implement controls that allow for the identification and proper classification of vendor payments to applicable grant period. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The District will strengthen internal controls to ensure that vendor payments are appropriately aligned with the correct grant reporting period. MPS will implement a standardized review process to validate that vendor invoices and related purchase orders are coded to the correct grant period, establish clear procedures for identifying the period of performance for goods and services, enhance coordination between program and finance staff to validate the timing and allowability of expenditures, conduct periodic monitoring of vendor payments to ensure compliance with grant period requirements, and provide training to relevant staff relating to grant period compliance and expenditure classification. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Senior Director of Specialized Services, Accounting Director (Deputy CFO), Financial Reporting Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2026
Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management acknowledges the finding and agrees with the recommendation. Once notified of the stipend rate issue, management immediately corrected the allocation and ensured the unallowable portion was funded with non-Federal resources. To prevent fut...
Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management acknowledges the finding and agrees with the recommendation. Once notified of the stipend rate issue, management immediately corrected the allocation and ensured the unallowable portion was funded with non-Federal resources. To prevent future occurrences, SoFIA Management has reinforced controls by (1) requiring a compliance review of stipend rates before charging costs to the AmeriCorps award, (2) updating written procedures to reflect stipend limits, and (3) providing further training to program and finance staff. These measures will ensure that only allowable stipend costs are charged to the Federal program going forward. We are committed to maintaining strong fiscal controls and ensuring full compliance with all federal grant requirements. Contact and Completion Date: Cresha Reid, 954-484-7117, creid@thesofia.org, is the primary contact, and the Chief Executive Officer at the South Florida Institute on Aging. The corrective action will be resolved before the end of the next fiscal year-end of June 30, 2026.
Corrective Action Plan Audit Finding Reference Number: 2025-001 Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: Whitney Gustin Conno...
Corrective Action Plan Audit Finding Reference Number: 2025-001 Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: Whitney Gustin Connor, Executive Director Planned Corrective Action: Kid's First will implement the following procedures to address the lack of time and effort documentation and supervisory review for salary allocations charged to SLFRF grants: Require written supervisory review and approval of salary allocation percentages for all employees charged to federal grants. Develop and document procedures for periodic reconciliation of salary charges to actual time and effort records, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430. Anticipated Completion Date: July 31, 2026
Period of Performance – Assistance Listing No. 93.958 Recommendation: Management should review and revise its process for allocating costs to federal grants to include additional layers of review and so that costs for which some or all are from outside of the period of performance, may be appropriat...
Period of Performance – Assistance Listing No. 93.958 Recommendation: Management should review and revise its process for allocating costs to federal grants to include additional layers of review and so that costs for which some or all are from outside of the period of performance, may be appropriately excluded from the federal grant. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will revise cost allocation procedures to add program and finance review steps to ensure that only costs incurred within the applicable period of performance are charged to federal grants. Costs identified as outside the allowable period will be excluded or reclassified. Updated procedures will be communicated to relevant staff and monitored for compliance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: George Pepe Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2026
Condition: The CMHSP included all contract costs, including amounts over $25,000 in the modified total direct costs. Corrective Action: Those involved in managing and reporting for the grant will review the approved budget to ensure understanding of what has been approved by SAMHSA. Prior to request...
Condition: The CMHSP included all contract costs, including amounts over $25,000 in the modified total direct costs. Corrective Action: Those involved in managing and reporting for the grant will review the approved budget to ensure understanding of what has been approved by SAMHSA. Prior to requesting funds each month, accounting assistant and chief operating officer will review total costs to date to ensure they are accounted properly in line with modified total direct costs. At year end, a final check will occur to ensure all costs are reported according to modified total direct costs methodology. Staff responsible: Kristyn Kostelec, Grant Manager, Karen Watson, Accounting Assistant, and Kelly Jenkins, Chief Operating Officer Anticipated completion date: 12/30/26
Condition: Expenditures charged to the grant were not authorized in the grant budget. Corrective Action: Each month, the grant manager and accounting assistant will review the items charged to the grant in detail to ensure that all charges are appropriately accounted for according to the grant manag...
Condition: Expenditures charged to the grant were not authorized in the grant budget. Corrective Action: Each month, the grant manager and accounting assistant will review the items charged to the grant in detail to ensure that all charges are appropriately accounted for according to the grant manager's direction and approved grant budget. Staff responsible: Kristyn Kostelec, Grant Manager and Karen Watson, Accounting Assistant Anticipated completion date: 6/30/26
« 1 6 7 9 10 399 »