Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
56,575
In database
Filtered Results
53,589
Matching current filters
Showing Page
864 of 2144
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding --- The Organization did not submit its Single Audit reporting package, Including the data collection form (Form SF-SAC), to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the required timeframe following the end of the fiscal year. The report was not filed and therefore not made available to users ...
Finding --- The Organization did not submit its Single Audit reporting package, Including the data collection form (Form SF-SAC), to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the required timeframe following the end of the fiscal year. The report was not filed and therefore not made available to users timely. Corrective action – The Organization will seek to achieve a timelier closing process and audit submission. Status --- Corrective action in progress. Completion date --- Before December 31, 2025 Contact --- Laura Purdy, COO Contact phone --- (973) 742-5518 Contact address --- 223 Ellison St., Paterson, New Jersey 07505
Finding --- The Organization does not consistently reconcile its quarterly financial reports submitted to governmental agencies to the general ledger by grant program. Corrective action – Management will develop and implement written procedures to improve their reporting process in accordance with U...
Finding --- The Organization does not consistently reconcile its quarterly financial reports submitted to governmental agencies to the general ledger by grant program. Corrective action – Management will develop and implement written procedures to improve their reporting process in accordance with Uniform Guidance and New Jersey 15-08-OMB. Status --- Corrective action in progress. Completion date --- Before December 31, 2025 Contact --- Laura Purdy, COO Contact phone --- (973) 742-5518 Contact address --- 223 Ellison St., Paterson, New Jersey 07505
Finding --- Internal controls over financial statement reporting lack segregation of duties. Corrective action – Management understands the risk involved and will update policies and procedures to clearly define and create segregation of duties. Status --- Corrective action in progress. Completion d...
Finding --- Internal controls over financial statement reporting lack segregation of duties. Corrective action – Management understands the risk involved and will update policies and procedures to clearly define and create segregation of duties. Status --- Corrective action in progress. Completion date --- Before December 31, 2025 Contact --- Laura Purdy, COO Contact phone --- (973) 742-5518 Contact address --- 223 Ellison St., Paterson, New Jersey 07
Finding --- Inadequate controls regarding preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Award and State Financial Assistance. Corrective action – Management will continue to enhance the internal control structure and improve the chart of accounts to maintain full transparency and implement ...
Finding --- Inadequate controls regarding preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Award and State Financial Assistance. Corrective action – Management will continue to enhance the internal control structure and improve the chart of accounts to maintain full transparency and implement sub classes within the current software. Status --- Corrective action in progress. Completion date --- Before December 31, 2025 Contact --- Laura Purdy, COO Contact phone --- (973) 742-5518 Contact address --- 223 Ellison St., Paterson, New Jersey 07505
The District has adopted a Federal Grant Reporting Policy requiring all submissions to federal or state agencies to include complete supporting documentation retained for at least seven years. A standardized Lost Revenue Calculation Template has been created to document methodology, source data, and...
The District has adopted a Federal Grant Reporting Policy requiring all submissions to federal or state agencies to include complete supporting documentation retained for at least seven years. A standardized Lost Revenue Calculation Template has been created to document methodology, source data, and reconciliations to general ledger balances. The CFO will ensure all future PRF and grant reports undergo a dual review and sign-off process prior to submission. Historical data for Period 4 PRF reporting has been reconstructed from audited financial records, and the District has verified that lost revenues during the eligible reporting period exceed the total PRF funds retained, demonstrating that all funds were appropriately supported from a financial standpoint. While the original internal calculation did not agree to the exact amounts reported to HRSA, the District’s current analysis and documentation substantiate the PRF funds in accordance with HRSA’s intent and guidance. Staff have completed Uniform Guidance and HRSA PRF compliance training to ensure future submissions include all required support and reconciliation. Target Completion November 30, 2025. Responsible Official: Diane Moore, Chief Financial Officer.
Finding 2023-008: This is for Pohnpei Community Health Centers. 1) For 2 of 2 items tested. We noted that total expenditures reported in documentary support submitted by the State for drawdown requests do not match the initial amounts requested, approved, and received by the awarding agency. We are ...
Finding 2023-008: This is for Pohnpei Community Health Centers. 1) For 2 of 2 items tested. We noted that total expenditures reported in documentary support submitted by the State for drawdown requests do not match the initial amounts requested, approved, and received by the awarding agency. We are aware that the expenditure reports furnished to us are not the originals that would have accompanied the State’s initial request for reimbursement from the awarding agency. It does not appear that the original supporting expenditure reports were retained. 2) The State does not appear to have a policy or adopted standard methodology for monitoring 93.224 programmatic cash needs and scheduling regular drawdowns. Root Cause Analysis 1) The State’s documentary retention controls over programmatic drawdowns need improvement 2) The State has not established a policy or standard operating procedure for monitoring 93.224 programmatic cash needs and scheduling regular drawdowns. Corrective Actions 1) Strengthen its controls over documentary retention for drawdowns. Retain expenditure reports for the basis of drawdowns at the time of filing and ensure there is appropriate explanatory documentation retained for any special reconciling items. 2) Establish clear policies and procedures for monitoring cash needs, performing drawdowns, and retaining documentation of drawdowns. Responsible Parties For CAP 1, Director of DOTA and the Chief of Finance For CAP 2, Director of DOTA and the Chief of Finance Timeline Verification of Effectiveness Conduct regular assessments to ensure the implementation of the aforementioned action plans.
Finding 2023-007: This is for Pohnpei Community Health Centers. The FFR (SF425’s) were submitted after the due dates. Root Cause Analysis The State’s monitoring controls over FFR reporting deadlines were ineffective Corrective Actions 1) Establish a tracking schedule for grant reporting deadlines up...
Finding 2023-007: This is for Pohnpei Community Health Centers. The FFR (SF425’s) were submitted after the due dates. Root Cause Analysis The State’s monitoring controls over FFR reporting deadlines were ineffective Corrective Actions 1) Establish a tracking schedule for grant reporting deadlines upon award or extension and 2) Retain copies of all submissions and supporting expenditure reports for audit purposes Responsible Parties For CAP 1, Executive Director of CHC and the Administrative officers For CAP 2, Director of DOTA and the Chief of Finance Timeline Verification of Effectiveness Conduct regular assessments to ensure the implementation of the aforementioned action plans.
Finding 2023-006: This is for Special Education Condition 1: For 4 of the transactions total question costs $512. The supporting documentations were not provided. Conditional 2: No departmental timecards or timesheets were provided to support compensation. Condition 3. Payroll with timecards, there ...
Finding 2023-006: This is for Special Education Condition 1: For 4 of the transactions total question costs $512. The supporting documentations were not provided. Conditional 2: No departmental timecards or timesheets were provided to support compensation. Condition 3. Payroll with timecards, there were no verification performed at the departments to ensure that what is being paid are correct. Root Cause Analysis a. Condition 1: Ineffective documentation retention at treasury, exacerbated by office relocation. b. Condition 2: Ineffective retention at departmental agencies where timesheets are held. c. Conditions 3(a) and 3(c): Weak internal controls over reconciliation between departmental timesheets and treasury uniform timesheets. Treasury does not regularly obtain departmental timesheets. d. Condition 3(b): Manual timecard errors from daily stamp-based systems. Corrective Actions 1. Strengthen documentation retention controls. 2. Enhance monitoring at the departmental level or implement a uniform timekeeping system to reduce reconciliation issues. 3. Require submission of departmental timekeeping reports to treasury for secondary reconciliation. 4. Ensure explanatory documentation is retained when uniform timesheets differ from departmental records. Responsible Parties For CAP 1. Director of DOTA and Payroll division For CAP 2. Special Education Administrator and his timekeepers For CAP 3. Director of DOTA and Payroll division For CAP 4. Both Department of DOTA and Special Ed Timeline Verification of Effectiveness Conduct regular assessments to ensure the implementation of the aforementioned action plans.
View Audit 372843 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2023-005: Condition 1: The State’s capital asset register reflected no Compact Sector–funded capitalized infrastructure additions since FY 2016, despite completed contracts during 2016 through 2021. The State was unable to provide supporting documentation evidencing capitalizable values, pro...
Finding 2023-005: Condition 1: The State’s capital asset register reflected no Compact Sector–funded capitalized infrastructure additions since FY 2016, despite completed contracts during 2016 through 2021. The State was unable to provide supporting documentation evidencing capitalizable values, project ownership, or other required details. Conditional 2: Four (4) assets or batches of assets that met the State’s capitalization requirements were not capitalized until corrected through audit adjustments Root Cause Analysis For both conditions there is a lack of internal control monitoring over fixed asset capitalization. Corrective Actions 1. For Condition 1, the State should obtain documentation to support capitalizable values and confirm ownership. 2. For Condition 2, all assets related to health-sector acquisitions, the State should improve coordination between the Department of Health and Human Services and the State Treasury to ensure eligible items are capitalized at requisition or purchase order stage. Responsible Parties For Corrective Action Plan 1: Director of DOTA and Procurement Officer For Corrective Action Plan 2: Director of Health and his administrative officers Director of DOTA, Certification and Procurement officer Timeline Verification of Effectiveness Conduct regular assessments to ensure the implementation of the aforementioned action plans.
Finding 2023-004: For 1 (or 1%) of 60 transactions tested, aggregating $1,187,753 out of $19,516,462 in program expenditures, the State made an advance payment using sector grant funds. No documentation was provided to evidence prior grantor agency concurrence to waive the specific special provision...
Finding 2023-004: For 1 (or 1%) of 60 transactions tested, aggregating $1,187,753 out of $19,516,462 in program expenditures, the State made an advance payment using sector grant funds. No documentation was provided to evidence prior grantor agency concurrence to waive the specific special provision. For 11 (or 23%) of 49 personnel records tested under the Compact Sector Education and Supplemental Education grants, no documentation was available to show that the annual performance evaluation had been performed. Root Cause Analysis • For advance payments, either concurrence was not obtained, or documentation was not retained; and a lack of familiarity with specific grant conditions may have contributed to the noncompliance. • For evaluations, documentation retention controls over personnel files were inadequate. Corrective Actions • For the health grants, if advance payments are necessary, the State should (a) use general fund advances with later reimbursement; (b) establish a letter of credit; or (c) obtain prior OIA concurrence. • For the Education and Supplemental Education grants, the State should strengthen controls to ensure annual evaluations are completed and retained in personnel files. Responsible Parties For bullet point one: Director of Health and his administrative officers Director of DOTA, certification and payable section For bullet point two: Director of Education and Personnel Managers Timeline Verification of Effectiveness Conduct regular assessments to ensure the effective implementation of the aforementioned action plans.
Finding 2023-003: Test no 15 is for Department of Education and the rest are for Department of Health. • For test no. 15, obligation 361854 – Of 3 quotations obtained for a small purchase transaction, the highest quotation was selected, there was no documented justification to support the procuremen...
Finding 2023-003: Test no 15 is for Department of Education and the rest are for Department of Health. • For test no. 15, obligation 361854 – Of 3 quotations obtained for a small purchase transaction, the highest quotation was selected, there was no documented justification to support the procurement selection. • For test no. 16, obligation 372216 – The procurement was sourced from one vendor and lacks additional quotations. There was no documented justification to support the sole-source procurement. • For test no. 17, obligation 372215 – The procurement was sourced from one vendor and lacks additional quotations. There was no documented justification to support the sole-source procurement. • For test no. 22, obligation 334914 – The procurement file included 2 quotations and a justification form that did not relate to the transaction as it cites an explanation for purchasing goods from other vendors unrelated to the actual transaction. Of the 2 vendors included, there did not appear to be a notable difference in goods/services offered, however the higher of the 2 was selected. Consequently, we could not determine the ultimate basis for vendor selection. • For test no. 30, obligation 358537 – The procurement as sourced from one vendor and lacks additional quotations. There was no documented justification for the sole-source procurement. Root Cause Analysis Ineffective documentation filing and retention controls, further impacted by the relocation of the State Treasury office. Corrective Actions • Strengthen procurement documentation controls and ensure rationales and justifications for vendor selection are retained in procurement files. Responsible Parties Director of Education and its administrative officers Director of Health and administrative officers Director of DOTA, certification and payable section Timeline Verification of Effectiveness Periodically verify the department's purchases to ensure that no instances of noncompliance are still taking place.
View Audit 372843 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2023-002: This finding is for Education Department Condition 1. Impact: For 3 or (5%) of 60 non-payroll transactions tested, (a) no financial records were available to substantiate allowability; or (b) the available procurement file documentation was insufficient to substantiate allowability...
Finding 2023-002: This finding is for Education Department Condition 1. Impact: For 3 or (5%) of 60 non-payroll transactions tested, (a) no financial records were available to substantiate allowability; or (b) the available procurement file documentation was insufficient to substantiate allowability, as follows: The noncompliance resulted in a total questioned cost of $604. Condition 2. For 13 or (20%) of 65 payroll transactions tested, no departmental timecards or timesheet documentation was provided to support compensation, taxes, and fringe benefits. Condition 3. Of the 49 payroll transactions tested where departmental timecards or timesheet support was provided, we identified the following: 1) For 1 employee, the uniform timesheet reported 16 hours of sick leave, while the departmental timesheet reported 80 hours of regular work. 2) For 1 employee, the uniform timesheet was not signed by all required authorized signatories. 3) For 1 employee, the uniform timesheet reported 56 regular hours, while the departmental timesheet reflected 43 regular hours; however, the employee was paid for 80 regular hours, resulting in an overpayment of approximately $76 (processed on May 2, 2023). Root Cause Analysis • For Condition 1, ineffective documentation filing and retention controls were exacerbated by the relocation of the State Treasury office during the audit period. • For Condition 2, ineffective documentation filing and retention controls existed at the departmental agency level, where timesheets or other timekeeping records were retained. • For Condition 3(a), insufficient internal controls at the departmental level failed to ensure reconciliation of departmental timesheets with uniform timesheets submitted to the State Treasury. The Treasury does not consistently receive departmental support and therefore relies on agency review and certification. • For Condition 3(b), required signatory authorization controls failed at both the departmental and treasury levels. • For Condition 3(c), existing controls failed to detect and prevent the overpayment. Corrective Actions 1) For Condition 1. Strengthen documentation filing and retention controls. 2) For Condition 2 & 3 a) Enhance monitoring controls at the departmental level or implementing a uniform timekeeping system to reduce reconciliation burdens b) Establish policies requiring submission of department timekeeping report to the State treasury to allow for secondary reconciliation c) Reinforcing the requirement that when changes are made affecting uniform timesheets but not departmental records, appropriate explanatory documentation be retained. Responsible Parties For Condition 1. • Director of DOTA/Payable Section - Strengthen documentation filing and retention controls. For Condition 2 & 3 • Director of Education/Timekeepers - Enhance monitoring controls at the departmental level or implementing a uniform timekeeping system to reduce reconciliation burdens • Director of DOTA and Payroll Section - Establish policies requiring submission of departmental timekeeping reports to the State treasury to allow for secondary reconciliation. • Director of DOTA and Payroll Section - Reinforce the requirement that when changes are made affecting uniform timesheets but not departmental records, appropriate explanatory documentation be retained. Timeline Verification of Effectiveness For condition 1, the State Treasury will perform routine inspections of the filing systems to verify compliance and address individuals who resist necessary changes. For Conditions 2 and 3, payroll will not be disbursed to any department that fails to adhere to the new action plan
View Audit 372843 Questioned Costs: $1
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Period of Performance Child Care and Development Block Grant – Assistance Listing No. 93.575 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization design, implement, monitor and maintain evidence over internal controls. Explanation of disagreement with audit...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Period of Performance Child Care and Development Block Grant – Assistance Listing No. 93.575 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization design, implement, monitor and maintain evidence over internal controls. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will assign responsibility for maintaining source documentation to a specific individual or team and develop a system for organizing and storing source documentation, such as a centralized electronic database. Monitoring and testing procedures will be implemented to ensure that source documentation is being maintained and is readily accessible. Lastly, there will be regular reviews and updates to the system for organizing and storing source documentation as needed to ensure ongoing effectiveness.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Allowability Child Care and Development Block Grant – Assistance Listing No. 93.575 Recommendation: The auditors recommend the Organization design, implement, and monitor internal controls over allocations as well as maintain source documentation to suppo...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Allowability Child Care and Development Block Grant – Assistance Listing No. 93.575 Recommendation: The auditors recommend the Organization design, implement, and monitor internal controls over allocations as well as maintain source documentation to support amounts charged to the grant. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will review the current internal controls over allocations and source documentation to identify any gaps or weaknesses and develop a plan to address any identified gaps or weaknesses, including updating policies and procedures as necessary. Management will also communicate the updated policies and procedures to all relevant employees and provide training as needed. Monitoring and testing procedures will be implemented to ensure that the updated policies and procedures are being followed. There will also be regular reviews and updates to the policies and procedures as needed to ensure ongoing effectiveness. Management will assign responsibility for maintaining source documentation to a specific individual or team and develop a system for organizing and storing source documentation, such as a centralized electronic database. Monitoring and testing procedures will be implemented to ensure that source documentation is being maintained and is readily accessible. Lastly, there will be regular reviews and updates to the system for organizing and storing source documentation as needed to ensure ongoing effectiveness.
View Audit 372833 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation We recommend that management enhance its internal control structure, including financial close and reporting, to ensure timely filing of future Single Audit reporting packages Management Response Corrective Action:FNCH recognizes the critical importance of establishing robust internal...
Recommendation We recommend that management enhance its internal control structure, including financial close and reporting, to ensure timely filing of future Single Audit reporting packages Management Response Corrective Action:FNCH recognizes the critical importance of establishing robust internal controls to guarantee the timely preparation and accurate submission of reports and records for audit purposes, particularly in alignment with the requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.512. To effectively implement these internal controls, management will enforce procedures for the timely preparation of all necessary reports and records, including the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). This will not only facilitate smoother audit processes but also ensure adherence to the 2 CFR 200.512. Management will train staff and establish timelines and responsibilities for report preparation and documentation to enhance compliance and streamline overall operations. Expected Outcome: -On-time Single Audit filings in compliance with federal rules. -Clear visibility and accountability for deadlines. -Reduced risk of penalties and funding delays. -Greater confidence from agencies and stakeholders. Due Date of Completion: 3 days following issuance of the audit report Responsible Party(ies): CEO, CFO
Grants are looked at for compliance and ensures proper spending and documentation.
Grants are looked at for compliance and ensures proper spending and documentation.
Finding Reference Number: 2023-004 Description of Finding: The Semi-annual Federal Financial Reports (SF-425) was not submitted timely. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: Authority staff agrees to the finding as described. Corrective Action: • An internal grant manager has been appointed to...
Finding Reference Number: 2023-004 Description of Finding: The Semi-annual Federal Financial Reports (SF-425) was not submitted timely. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: Authority staff agrees to the finding as described. Corrective Action: • An internal grant manager has been appointed to enable closer financial oversight and we will work closely with engineering and outside consultants to ensure future grant compliance. • Director of Finance has looked into grant management certification courses in order to further educate staff on grant tracking and reporting requirements. • The Authority has since contracted with outside consultants to assist with grant management.
Finding Reference Number: 2023-003 Description of Finding: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was not reconciled and complete prior to the beginning of the audit. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: The identified issue pertaining to the incomplete SEFA is accurate and cle...
Finding Reference Number: 2023-003 Description of Finding: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was not reconciled and complete prior to the beginning of the audit. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: The identified issue pertaining to the incomplete SEFA is accurate and clearly defined. Corrective Action: • The Authority has since contracted with a consultant to assist staff with project and budget management of the same project the grant was funding. • Reporting requirements will be completed by the consultant or finance department going forward rather than the engineering manager. • Monthly meetings are held with staff from both accounting, engineering, and the grantor to discuss grant expenditures, invoice submittals and reimbursements, and project updates. • Director of Finance has looked into grant management certification courses in order to further educate staff on grant tracking and reporting requirements.
Finding Reference Number: 2023-002 Description of Finding: The Authority did not complete and submit the February 28, 2023 audited financial statements and single audit by the required deadline of November 30, 2023 or 9 months from fiscal year end. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: Authori...
Finding Reference Number: 2023-002 Description of Finding: The Authority did not complete and submit the February 28, 2023 audited financial statements and single audit by the required deadline of November 30, 2023 or 9 months from fiscal year end. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: Authority staff agrees the audited financial statement and single audit were significantly delayed. Corrective Action: • Development of audit timeline and “needs” list to be compiled from all staff prior to audit submittal. • Engage with auditors earlier in order to meet required reporting deadlines. • Implementation of month-end closing process rather than waiting for year-end to complete all reconciliations. • Begin contacting vendors for estimates on any potential accruals prior to the end of the fiscal year.
Audit Finding: Finding 2023-002: Submission of Single Audit Management’s Comments on Findings and Recommendation: We concur with the auditor's findings. Management’s Corrective Action Plan: We now are aware of the audit requirements and are committed to compliance. The Organization will engage audit...
Audit Finding: Finding 2023-002: Submission of Single Audit Management’s Comments on Findings and Recommendation: We concur with the auditor's findings. Management’s Corrective Action Plan: We now are aware of the audit requirements and are committed to compliance. The Organization will engage auditors to perform subsequent period audits, as applicable. Employee / Division Responsible for Execution: Executive Director Timeline and Estimated Completion Date: Effective Immediately
A standing monthly review meeting has been established between Finance and Engineering to review a list of current grants and the associated activity. This meeting will include discussing any future or proposed grant applications as well. Additionally, Finance and the audit team are meeting to revie...
A standing monthly review meeting has been established between Finance and Engineering to review a list of current grants and the associated activity. This meeting will include discussing any future or proposed grant applications as well. Additionally, Finance and the audit team are meeting to review proper recording of the grants in the general ledger to ensure proper representation in the financial statements.
Finding: 2023-004: Significant Deficiency - Payroll Allocations Description of Finding: Payroll costs were allocated to grant programs using manual spreadsheets rather than an entity-wide time-tracking system, making it difficult to clearly demonstrate the proportional benefit required. This manual ...
Finding: 2023-004: Significant Deficiency - Payroll Allocations Description of Finding: Payroll costs were allocated to grant programs using manual spreadsheets rather than an entity-wide time-tracking system, making it difficult to clearly demonstrate the proportional benefit required. This manual approach increased the risk of allocation inconsistencies and made documentation less robust than needed. Cause: The use of manual spreadsheet-based timekeeping did not provide an auditable system for allocating payroll costs to grants. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: SacAsian agrees with the finding. Corrective Action: SacAsian acknowledges the significance of this finding and the potential for misstating staff expense and has taken steps to strengthen its time-tracking and payroll allocation processes. Beginning January 1, 2025, SacAsian implemented a new accounting system that includes electronic timesheets for staff to track their time daily to specific grant activity. Timesheet training has been performed and timesheet completion is required for all employees each day, providing support for hours worked/billed, as well as documentation of the certification and approvals that all staff time entered is accurate and in compliance with contract requirements, and providing proper support for all grant direct labor and indirect costs. Monthly reviews by the Project Directors/Managers, with secondary review by the accounting team are performed, ensuring ongoing compliance with federal requirements. Responsible Party: Ryan Fong, Director of Finance, 916-446-7883, rfong@sacasiancc.org Karen Wood, Not-for-Profit CFO (Creating Answers LLC), 916-930-0777, kwood@creatinganswers.com Pat Fong Kushida, President & CEO, 916-446-7883, patfk@sacasiancc.org Projected Completion Date: January 2025
Finding: 2023-003: Material Weakness and Questioned Cost - Grant Claim Support Description of Finding: SacAsian’s accounting system design did not align grant billings with the general ledger’s underlying expenses, as only direct costs were coded to the grant and other allowable costs flowed to unre...
Finding: 2023-003: Material Weakness and Questioned Cost - Grant Claim Support Description of Finding: SacAsian’s accounting system design did not align grant billings with the general ledger’s underlying expenses, as only direct costs were coded to the grant and other allowable costs flowed to unrestricted. As a result, the ledger detail did not clearly demonstrate the grant claim support without additional reconciliation. Cause: A comprehensive system for allocating and documenting grant-related costs had not yet been implemented. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: SacAsian agrees with the finding. Corrective Action: SacAsian understands and acknowledges the significance of this finding and the potential that it creates for documentation gaps. The Controller and Director of Finance have implemented an ERP system which allows for better cost reporting and reviews of the grant-related expenses for accuracy, reliability, and reconciliation. While the general ledger details do not align, SacAsian did provide full documentation to substantiate the expenses claimed in each billing. Moving forward, all expenditures that have been billed will be reconciled to the general ledger monthly by the Director of Finance, Controller, and external CFO firm to ensure that billings match to expenditure detail and have been correctly allocated. Responsible Party: Ryan Fong, Director of Finance, 916-446-7883, rfong@sacasiancc.org Karen Wood, Not-for-Profit CFO (Creating Answers LLC), 916-930-0777, kwood@creatinganswers.com Pat Fong Kushida, President & CEO, 916-446-7883, patfk@sacasiancc.org Projected Completion Date: October 2025
View Audit 372580 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: 2023-002: Revised Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Description of Finding: Expenditures reported on the SEFA required revision during the Single Audit due to some inaccuracies, including one omitted program, which occurred because review and reconciliation procedures were n...
Finding: 2023-002: Revised Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Description of Finding: Expenditures reported on the SEFA required revision during the Single Audit due to some inaccuracies, including one omitted program, which occurred because review and reconciliation procedures were not fully sufficient. Cause: The underlying cause was insufficient internal controls over grant documentation review and the accounting of federal award activity. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: SacAsian agrees with the finding. Corrective Action: SacAsian acknowledges the significance of this finding and the potential for noncompliance with Uniform Guidance with the grantors and Federal entities, as well as potential increased risk of omitted federal programs and incorrect major program determination. To remediate these issues, SacAsian will strengthen its internal controls over SEFA preparation by implementing a multi-layer review and reconciliation process. SEFA schedules will be prepared by the Director of Finance and reviewed by the newly engaged external CFO firm. Final review will be performed by the President & CEO. SacAsian will implement a more rigorous review of all grant agreements, including pass-through awards, to verify federal components and Assistance Listing Number (ALN) details to ensure all federally funded activity is fully identified and properly reported on the SEFA. The SEFA will be reconciled to the general ledger, federal award agreements, billings submitted, and other supporting documentation. In addition, directors overseeing federal programs will be required to confirm that all federal awards under their purview are completely and accurately reflected. These enhanced controls will be implemented for the 2024 audit and maintained for subsequent audit periods. Responsible Party: Ryan Fong, Director of Finance, 916-446-7883, rfong@sacasiancc.org Pat Fong Kushida, President & CEO, 916-446-7883, patfk@sacasiancc.org Projected Completion Date: December 2025
Finding: 2023-001: Material Weakness - Untimely Audit Submission in Accordance with 0MB Uniform Guidance Description of Finding: The Sacramento Asian-Pacific Chamber of Commerce (SacAsian) did not submit its December 31, 2023 Single Audit reporting package—including the audited financial statements,...
Finding: 2023-001: Material Weakness - Untimely Audit Submission in Accordance with 0MB Uniform Guidance Description of Finding: The Sacramento Asian-Pacific Chamber of Commerce (SacAsian) did not submit its December 31, 2023 Single Audit reporting package—including the audited financial statements, Data Collection Form, prior-year status, and Corrective Action Plan—to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the required deadline. Cause: The submission was delayed because the Single Audit could not be completed on time due to change in audit firm and staffing shortages. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: SacAsian agrees with the finding. Corrective Action: SacAsian understands the seriousness of this deficiency and the need for strict adherence to timely audit submissions per the OMB Uniform Guidance. Additional staff have been hired to assist in accounting processes, including a Controller to review all accounting processes and procedures with the Director of Finance and implement best practice recommendations and stronger month-end closing procedures and schedule. The delay in performing the 2023 audit was caused by a change in auditors. Our previous auditor did not have the capacity to continue our audit engagement due to staff shortages related to COVID. A new audit firm identified and engaged. However, there were delays in beginning the audit, and staffing challenges internally with completing the audit such that deadlines were not met. Additionally, an external finance and accounting firm was hired in September 2025 to provide additional capacity and high-level support to bring our audits current by March 2026. The additional staffing, external expertise, and improved procedures will prevent untimely submissions in future years. Responsible Party: Ryan Fong, Director of Finance, 916-446-7883, rfong@sacasiancc.org Pat Fong Kushida, President & CEO, 916-446-7883, patfk@sacasiancc.org Projected Completion Date: March 2026
« 1 862 863 865 866 2144 »