Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
64,163
In database
Filtered Results
60,411
Matching current filters
Showing Page
364 of 2417
25 per page

Filters

Clear
The Financial Aid Office will continue to work closely with the Registrar's Office and Information Technology to resolve the NSLDS reporting discrepancies. Based on our preliminary review, the reporting inconsistencies appear to be related to changes in enrollment reporting processes and data feeds ...
The Financial Aid Office will continue to work closely with the Registrar's Office and Information Technology to resolve the NSLDS reporting discrepancies. Based on our preliminary review, the reporting inconsistencies appear to be related to changes in enrollment reporting processes and data feeds associated with the recent Student Information System (SIS) update, implemented in 2025. In partnership with the Registrar's Office, Information Technology, and the Office of Data Analytics (within Information Technology), the University will identify and correct the source of the repeated or inconsistent data submissions to the National Student Clearinghouse. Because enrollment reporting to the Clearinghouse directly impacts data reported to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS), resolving these data feed issues is a priority. Additionally, these departments will develop and implement enhanced internal controls to compare institutional enrollment records against NSLDS data to ensure accuracy and timeliness. One of these measures will include a monthly enrollment reporting audit to identify and correct discrepancies proactively. Updates may include but not be limited to timing and frequency of reporting, internal audits monthly during 2026, and expanding written documentation of the process and procedures. The University is committed to strengthening internal processes to ensure compliance with federal enrollment reporting requirements and to prevent recurrence of this issue.
While the District maintained the requisite supporting documentation, limitations arising from the internal record retention policies in place at the time, coupled with the retirement of key personnel, resulted in certain enrollment records not being readily locatable. The District acknowledges that...
While the District maintained the requisite supporting documentation, limitations arising from the internal record retention policies in place at the time, coupled with the retirement of key personnel, resulted in certain enrollment records not being readily locatable. The District acknowledges that these factors limited the availability of prior-year supporting data. This issue has since been addressed through updated retention practices to ensure that this does not occur going forward. Beginning with the next fiscal year cycle, the District has implemented a documented procedure that specifies the data sources, query parameters, and data pull dates; requires that all supporting extracts and calculations be retained in a centralized, version-controlled folder; and establishes a formal review and approval process to verify that enrollment and low-income counts reconcile to source documentation before submission to ADE. Staff in Federal Programs and Finance have been trained on the new procedure, and an annual internal review has been established to confirm compliance. The Director of Finance and the Director of Federal Programs are responsible for implementing and monitoring this corrective action, which will be completed prior to the next Title I eligibility submission.
Finding 2025-005 Program: SFA Cluster Assistance Listing No.: Various Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: FY 2024 – 2025 Compliance Requirement: Consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, Part 3, the auditor is required to test internal controls related to major p...
Finding 2025-005 Program: SFA Cluster Assistance Listing No.: Various Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: FY 2024 – 2025 Compliance Requirement: Consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, Part 3, the auditor is required to test internal controls related to major programs. The specific procedures to test internal control on a caseby-case basis considering factors such as the non-federal entity’s internal controls, the compliance requirements, the audit objectives for compliance, the auditor’s assessment of control risk, and the audit requirement to test internal controls. University’s Response: University management recognizes the finding and has addressed the issue. The Cost of Attendance calculation error affected a single student and resulted in an overaward of $400, which has been corrected and refunded to the Department of Education. Management believes the issue was isolated in nature and does not indicate a systemic weakness in the University’s awarding or billing processes. Corrective Action Plan The University reviewed the circumstances related to this finding and determined that the Cost of Attendance (COA) calculation error was limited in scope and affected a single student. The overaward of $400 has been corrected, and the required refund has been processed to the Department of Education. Management believes the condition was isolated in nature and does not indicate a systemic issue within the University’s awarding or billing processes. The University will continue to rely on its existing awarding and billing procedures, which are designed to support compliance with federal financial aid requirements. No additional corrective action is planned at this time. Existing procedures remain in effect. Name of the responsible person: Megan Inch, Associate Vice President of Student Financial Planning; Brad Calloway, Senior Vice President for Business Affairs Anticipated completion date: Resolved
Finding 2025-004 Program: SFA Cluster Assistance Listing No.: Various Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: FY 2024 – 2025 Compliance Requirement: Consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 668, Subpart B, Part 16, the University is required to identify and resolve discrepancies in...
Finding 2025-004 Program: SFA Cluster Assistance Listing No.: Various Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: FY 2024 – 2025 Compliance Requirement: Consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 668, Subpart B, Part 16, the University is required to identify and resolve discrepancies in the information received from different sources with respect to each student’s financial aid. University’s Response: The University identified that certain ISIR comment codes (including ISIR “C” flags) were not properly mapped within the student information system. As a result, those comment codes were not displayed or identified for review within the system workflow. At the time financial aid was disbursed, there were no unresolved C‑flags visible in the system requiring resolution prior to disbursement. The University self‑identified this system configuration issue and disclosed it to its auditors. Upon identification, the ISIR comment code mapping was corrected, and the University performed a review of affected records to ensure all required eligibility issues were identified and resolved. As a result of this issue, financial aid was disbursed to three students who were later determined to require additional eligibility review. The University refunded $160,789 to the Department of Education related to these students. Additionally, one student was determined to have been ineligible for aid in a prior award year, resulting in an additional refund obligation of $31,571, which remains payable to the Department of Education at the time of report issuance. Corrective Action Plan: The ISIR comment code mapping issue has been corrected, and all identified affected records have been reviewed and resolved. Management believes the condition resulted from a specific system configuration issue and was isolated in nature. No additional corrective action is planned at this time. The University believes the corrective actions already taken have addressed the root cause of the issue and that existing processes are operating as intended. Name of the responsible person: Megan Inch, Associate Vice President of Student Financial Planning; Brad Calloway, Senior Vice President for Business Affairs Anticipated completion date: Resolved
Finding 2025-003 Program: Grants to States for Medicaid Assistance Listing No.: 93.778 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award Year: FY 2024 – 2025 Compliance Requirement: Consistent with the requirements of the subaward agreement, the University is required to submit comp...
Finding 2025-003 Program: Grants to States for Medicaid Assistance Listing No.: 93.778 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award Year: FY 2024 – 2025 Compliance Requirement: Consistent with the requirements of the subaward agreement, the University is required to submit compliance reporting to the grantor annually beginning in the year the funds were received. University’s Response: The University was not provided with the required compliance reporting templates at the time the subaward was issued. As a result, the University was unable to submit the required reports during the applicable reporting period. The grantor did not request submission of the reports during this time. Upon becoming aware of the reporting requirement during the Single Audit process, the University requested the appropriate templates and reporting guidance from the grantor. The templates were subsequently provided, and the University is continuing to work with the grantor to ensure accurate completion and submission of the required compliance reporting. The University confirms that grant funds were used in accordance with the terms and allowable activities of the subaward agreement. Corrective Action Plan: The University will continue to seek clarification and guidance from the grantor regarding required compliance reporting and the appropriate format for submission. If sufficient guidance is not provided, the University will submit the required compliance reporting to the best of its ability based on available information, understanding that the submission may be subject to review or revision by the grantor. No additional corrective action is planned at this time. The University will continue to work with the grantor to address reporting requirements as information becomes available. Name of the responsible person: Brian Shollenberger, Vice President for Financial Affairs and University Development Anticipated completion date: May 31, 2026
Finding 2025-002 Program: Federal Work Study Assistance Listing No.: 84.033 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: FY 2024 – 2025 Compliance Requirement: N – Special Tests and Provisions – Institutions are required to verify all amounts paid are appropriately earned. University’s Respon...
Finding 2025-002 Program: Federal Work Study Assistance Listing No.: 84.033 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: FY 2024 – 2025 Compliance Requirement: N – Special Tests and Provisions – Institutions are required to verify all amounts paid are appropriately earned. University’s Response: The University uses Workday HCM as the official system of record for student employee time reporting. Student workers record time directly in Workday, and supervisors review and approve time entries each pay period prior to payroll processing. The time punches in question were reviewed and approved in Workday in accordance with standard procedures at the time of payment. Because the audit occurred six to eighteen months after the work was performed by the students, supervisors were unable to independently recall specific hours worked beyond the documentation maintained in Workday. However, system records indicate that the hours were reviewed and approved, and the University confirmed that any questioned amounts were offset by subsequent allowable hours worked. As noted by the auditors, questioned costs of $508 were identified; however, no return of Federal Work‑Study funds was required based on allowable offsetting hours. Corrective Action Plan: The University will continue to rely on its existing Federal Work‑Study timekeeping and payroll procedures, which require that student wages be based on hours worked in allowable positions. Management believes the condition identified was isolated in nature and not indicative of a systemic issue within the Federal Work‑Study program. No additional corrective action is planned at this time. Existing procedures remain in effect. Repeat Finding Explanation This finding is reported as a repeat due to similar conditions noted in the prior year related to Federal Work‑Study payroll documentation. However, the current‑year finding reflects a reduced scope, a lower number of students, and a significantly reduced questioned cost amount compared to the prior year. Management believes the issue is not systemic. Name of the responsible person: Marc Sears, Vice President of Human Resources; Brad Calloway, Senior Vice President for Business Affairs; Sandra Fantauzzi, Student Employment Program Manager; Megan Inch, Associate Vice President of Student Financial Planning
Finding 2025-001 Program: Federal Family Education Loans Assistance Listing No.: 84.032 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: Various Compliance Requirement: C – Cash Management – The University must return all excess cash received from the U.S. Department of Education in a timely mann...
Finding 2025-001 Program: Federal Family Education Loans Assistance Listing No.: 84.032 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: Various Compliance Requirement: C – Cash Management – The University must return all excess cash received from the U.S. Department of Education in a timely manner, if funds are not credited to an enrolled student’s account within 3 business days following the receipt of funds. University’s Response: The excess cash balance relates to prior award years and is not part of the currently audited period. The University has maintained these funds in a segregated federal funds account and safeguarded them from expenditure while performing reconciliation. The University is actively coordinating with the Department of Education to determine the appropriate process for returning the excess cash and will follow their guidance once received. The University has continued to ensure these funds are not comingled and has protected them from spending. Because of the discrepancies identified, each student’s loan history had to be reviewed and compared between the University Information System, the lender rosters, and the National Student Loan Database System (NSLDS) records. This individual review and reconciliation have proven to be a tedious but necessary process to identify the funds never posted to student records, returned to lenders, or entered incorrectly in the three separate systems of record. Corrective Action Plan: The University, working with an external financial aid consulting firm with experience in reconciling FFEL loan programs, has finished researching all related accounts against the National Student Loan Database System (NSLDS) records. The University continues to work with the Department of Education to determine how to return funds in instances where the last lender used is no longer available to process student loan funds, and lastly, book the appropriate entries for any funds determined to belong to the University that were not moved to the University operating accounts properly at the time of the transactions. Name of the responsible person: Brad Calloway, Senior Vice President for Business Affairs Anticipated completion date: Unknown
Finding 2025-008 – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Matching, Level of Effort, and Earmarking Contact Person: Susan Rios, Grants Manager Current status: In-Progress Anticipated Completion Date: February 06, 2026 Condition: The University did not have effective internal controls over the timely pr...
Finding 2025-008 – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Matching, Level of Effort, and Earmarking Contact Person: Susan Rios, Grants Manager Current status: In-Progress Anticipated Completion Date: February 06, 2026 Condition: The University did not have effective internal controls over the timely preparation and approval of employees’ time and effort certifications. Identification of repeat finding: N/A Resolution: The Time and Effort Reporting form was updated on February 6, 2026, to more accurately reflect the semesters covered by the form submitted by the respective program. The Grants Accounting Office will obtain the completed forms within 90 days of the last day of the performance period. The forms will be completed on a biannual basis and collected from each respective program within 90 days following the end date of the most recent semester.
Finding 2025-007 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person: Michael R. Castilleja, Director of Procurement and Other Support Services Current status: Resolved Anticipated Completion Date: Completed May 31, 2025 Condition: The University did not have evidence that the University perfo...
Finding 2025-007 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person: Michael R. Castilleja, Director of Procurement and Other Support Services Current status: Resolved Anticipated Completion Date: Completed May 31, 2025 Condition: The University did not have evidence that the University performed suspension and debarment checks for contractors on SAM.gov prior to entering into the contracts. Identification of repeat finding: Yes – 2024-005 Resolution: As of the completion date, language was incorporated into all contract and purchase order templates requiring vendors to acknowledge that they are not suspended or debarred. The Grants Accounting Office will verify and document, prior to approving any expenditure exceeding $25,000, that the vendor is not listed as suspended or debarred in SAM.gov.
Finding 2025-006 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person: Michael R. Castilleja, Director of Procurement and Other Support Services Current status: In-Progress Anticipated Completion Date: March 1, 2026 Condition: The University did not maintain records for procurements sufficient ...
Finding 2025-006 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person: Michael R. Castilleja, Director of Procurement and Other Support Services Current status: In-Progress Anticipated Completion Date: March 1, 2026 Condition: The University did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Identification of repeat finding: Yes – 2024-004; 2023-004 Resolution: UIW is committed to complying with 2 CFR 200.303 which requires that a non-federal entity must (a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The University will document the methodology used to select sole source or preferred vendor procurements through completion of the Sole Source/Preferred Vendor Justification Form. This documentation must include a clear and detailed rationale for vendor selection, an explanation of why competitive procurement was not feasible or appropriate, and a summary of any meetings, evaluations, market research, or review processes conducted prior to the final selection. A standardized Sole Source Justification Form is currently in place and will continue to be used in accordance with University policy. For procurements exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, completion and approval of the Sole Source/Preferred Vendor Justification Form is required prior to purchase. The required approval levels are based on procurement dollar thresholds. These approval levels will align with applicable federal, state, and institutional compliance requirements as listed in the University policy. All Sole Source/Preferred Vendor requests should be reviewed/signed by the requestor, Dean/Director and the Director of Procurement. The Grants Office and Procurement Office are responsible for reviewing and verifying all required documentation prior to purchase approval to ensure compliance with funding requirements and applicable regulations. The UIW Procurement Department conducts quarterly training sessions for the campus community. These sessions will include reinforcement of requirements and expectations related to sole source and preferred vendor procurement to promote consistent compliance and proper documentation practices.
Finding 2025-005 – Cash Management Contact Person: Cristen Alicea, Office of Financial Assistance Current status: Resolved Anticipated Completion Date: February 1, 2026 Condition: The University did not provide evidence that the School Account Statements (SAS) from ED were used to reconcile to the U...
Finding 2025-005 – Cash Management Contact Person: Cristen Alicea, Office of Financial Assistance Current status: Resolved Anticipated Completion Date: February 1, 2026 Condition: The University did not provide evidence that the School Account Statements (SAS) from ED were used to reconcile to the University’s financial and business records on a monthly basis during the year ended May 31, 2025. Identification of repeat finding: N/A Resolution: We maintain that we did reconcile to the School Account Statements, as evidenced by the reports that have been run against the SAS statements through the Banner job RLRDLRC. However, we did not maintain the individual monthly evidence of the mismatches identified on those reports, and their resolution. We are maintaining this evidence going forward.
Finding 2025-004 – Special Tests and Provisions – Disbursements to or on Behalf of Students Contact Person: Cristen Alicea, Office of Financial Assistance Ann Margaret Cervantes, Director of Business Office Current status: Resolved Anticipated Completion Date: Completed May 23, 2025 Condition: The U...
Finding 2025-004 – Special Tests and Provisions – Disbursements to or on Behalf of Students Contact Person: Cristen Alicea, Office of Financial Assistance Ann Margaret Cervantes, Director of Business Office Current status: Resolved Anticipated Completion Date: Completed May 23, 2025 Condition: The University was unable to provide evidence that internal controls over the return of credit balances to students were performed. Additionally, student credit balances were not identified and refunded to students within 14 days after the credit balance occurred. Identification of repeat finding: N/A Resolution: Our Outlook email folders have a limit on storage, despite using non-server folders to extend storage space and length of time. During 2024-2025, these folders reached full capacity and we were unable to send or receive any emails. We were instructed to delete older emails to regain functionality, which unfortunately meant that some of the automated emails that we use for our audit processes had to be deleted. Our Information Technology department was able to provide an online archive folder for Outlook emails that does not fill up, get deleted, or cause us to run out of space. Therefore, all emails proving processing will be available for review during next year’s audit. Please note that this control was in place, and was followed, but we are unable to provide the actual email output. In addition to the automated credit balance reports from ARGOS, the Business Office runs internal reports twice weekly to identify and process any pending credit balances.
Finding 2025-003 – Special Tests and Provisions – Disbursements to or on Behalf of Students Contact Person: Cristen Alicea, Office of Financial Assistance Current status: Resolved Anticipated Completion Date: Completed May 23, 2025 Condition: The University was unable to provide evidence that intern...
Finding 2025-003 – Special Tests and Provisions – Disbursements to or on Behalf of Students Contact Person: Cristen Alicea, Office of Financial Assistance Current status: Resolved Anticipated Completion Date: Completed May 23, 2025 Condition: The University was unable to provide evidence that internal controls were performed in relation to notifications of disbursements, including notification of the amount and type of Title IV funds students are expected to receive, and how and when those disbursements will be made (award letter), and when direct loans are being credited to a student’s account (direct loan notification). Identification of repeat finding: N/A Resolution: Our Outlook email folders have a limit on storage, despite using non-server folders to extend storage space and length of time. During 2024-2025, these folders reached full capacity and we were unable to send or receive any emails. We were instructed to delete older emails to regain functionality, which unfortunately meant that some of the automated emails that we use for our audit processes had to be deleted. Our Information Technology department was able to provide an online archive folder for Outlook emails that does not fill up, get deleted, or cause us to run out of space. Therefore, all emails proving processing will be available for review during next year’s audit. Please note that this control was in place, and was followed, but we are unable to provide the actual email output. There were no instances of non-compliance identified during this audit.
Finding 2025-002 – Special Tests and Provisions – Return of Title IV Funds Contact Person: Cristen Alicea, Office of Financial Assistance Current status: In-Progress Anticipated Completion Date: May 1, 2026 Condition: The University did not provide evidence of an effective review process to ensure t...
Finding 2025-002 – Special Tests and Provisions – Return of Title IV Funds Contact Person: Cristen Alicea, Office of Financial Assistance Current status: In-Progress Anticipated Completion Date: May 1, 2026 Condition: The University did not provide evidence of an effective review process to ensure the timely calculation and return of Title IV funds to ED. The University did not accurately calculate and return Title IV funds in a timely manner to ED, within 45 days after the date the institution determined that a student withdrew. Identification of repeat finding: Yes – 2024-002, 2023-002 Resolution: The Director of Financial Assistance performed a full review of all withdrawals during 2023-2024, and 2024-2025, to ensure calculations were complete, accurate, and funds returned as required. Documentation will be maintained for review by the auditors and the Department of Education to prove funds were returned correctly, even if not timely. The continuation of this issue was caused by the continued difficulty with recruiting and keeping financial assistance advisors, and the extraordinary disruption caused by the 2024-2025 FAFSA changes. We were unable to fully remediate our staffing issues during the 2024-2025 academic year. We brought on new staff which required extensive training. However, we are now able to spend more time focusing on compliance areas and will be able to fully implement our planned compliance controls during the 2025-2026 aid year. We will not have any returns unprocessed or made outside of 45 days after May 1, 2026. In addition to new staff and training, we will implement a secondary review process for all Return of Title IV transactions whereby an advisor will process the initial calculation and return, and then either the Assistant Director or Director of Financial Assistance will perform a secondary review which evaluates the date of the withdrawal, the date of determination, the eligible disbursed/non-disbursed aid amounts, the returned amounts, and confirms the returned amounts in Banner and COD. This internal review process will be performed upon 100% of Return of Title IV calculations each academic year.
Finding 2025-001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting Contact Person: Marisol M. Scheer, Registrar’s Office Cristen Alicea, Office of Financial Assistance Current status: In-progress Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2026 Condition: The University did not provide evidence of an e...
Finding 2025-001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting Contact Person: Marisol M. Scheer, Registrar’s Office Cristen Alicea, Office of Financial Assistance Current status: In-progress Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2026 Condition: The University did not provide evidence of an effective review process to ensure accurate and timely reporting of student status changes to NSLDS. The University did not report program enrollment effective date or student status to the NSLDS for 1 of 60 students selected for testing. Identification of Repeat Finding: Yes – 2024-001, 2023-001, 2022-001, 2021-001, 2020-001, 2019-002 Resolution: We would again like to reiterate that even though this is considered a repeat finding for enrollment reporting, this particular issue is different than the previous findings. The Registrar's Office has implemented a control whereby a sample of students are reviewed after submission to the National Student Clearinghouse. This student did not appear as part of the sample and was unknown until the audit. We have reviewed all pertinent files for this student and can confirm that all student processing had no errors. In an improvement effort, the Registrar's Office will provide a sample to the Office of Financial Assistance to review for successful data processing. The Registrar's Office has begun researching why the student was not reported but have been able to confirm no procedural errors or delays with the student record that could have caused reporting issues.
Audit Firm: Sikich Audit Period: For the Year Ended May 31, 2025 Criteria: An institution must use the Return to Title IV refund calculation (34 CFR 668.22) A. Comments on Findings and Recommendations Finding 2025-001 Incorrect R2T4 Refund Calculation Condition: Sikich tested twelve drop students an...
Audit Firm: Sikich Audit Period: For the Year Ended May 31, 2025 Criteria: An institution must use the Return to Title IV refund calculation (34 CFR 668.22) A. Comments on Findings and Recommendations Finding 2025-001 Incorrect R2T4 Refund Calculation Condition: Sikich tested twelve drop students and found six incorrect refund calculations. The condition was caused by not including proper break days from the students' Return to Title IV calculations. B. Actions Taken or Planned Finding 2025-001 Incorrect R2T4 Refund Calculation The R2T4 calculation process has been updated to transition into using the built-in R2T4 calculator in the Jenzabar Financial aid software system. This is to ensure that the scheduled break periods are accounted for when calculating the percentage of payment period completed. We have since discountinued using the COD R2T4 calculator. Financial aid staff have been retrained to proper R2T4 procedures including the correct treatment of institutional break days. A secondary review process has been put in place to ensure accuracy of R2T4 calculations prior to submission and processing. Judson University has credited the appropriate amounts to all affected students to resolve the discrepancies identified in this finding. Sarah Taylor Vice President for Business Affairs
Action To Be Taken: To ensure federal compliance for the Corona virus Relief Fund (ALN 21.019), the organization will implement a secondary review process. After the Executive Director prepares the federal financial reports, a designated member of the Board Finance Committee will review the supporti...
Action To Be Taken: To ensure federal compliance for the Corona virus Relief Fund (ALN 21.019), the organization will implement a secondary review process. After the Executive Director prepares the federal financial reports, a designated member of the Board Finance Committee will review the supporting documentation (General Ledger and invoices) for accuracy before the report is submitted to the granting agency.•Responsible Party: Executive Director and Board Finance Committee. Anticipated Completion Date: February 28, 2026.
Finding 2025-001 Recommendation: It is recommended that management work closely with the NSC and the DoE to ensure that student statuses are reported timely. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The late receipt of the ECAR was out of the University’s control due to a known ...
Finding 2025-001 Recommendation: It is recommended that management work closely with the NSC and the DoE to ensure that student statuses are reported timely. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The late receipt of the ECAR was out of the University’s control due to a known issue with the new system implemented by the DoE for the EApp (Eligibility Application), which created a delay in the updated branch code for Lancaster. Individual Responsible for Corrective Action: Deanna Daly, ddaly@sju.edu and Sarah Taylor, swilli01@sju.edu Anticipated Completion Date for Corrective Action: N/A – no further corrective action is needed from the University at this time.
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended May 31, 2025 Finding 2025-003 - Cash Management Condition G5 Drawdown requests were not documented as reviewed and approved by a responsible party separate from the preparer. For 2 of the 7 G5 draws tested, there was no d...
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended May 31, 2025 Finding 2025-003 - Cash Management Condition G5 Drawdown requests were not documented as reviewed and approved by a responsible party separate from the preparer. For 2 of the 7 G5 draws tested, there was no documentation of review or approval by someone other than the preparer. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Corrective Action Plan Corrective Action Planned: A form will be created to support each G5 draw or refund. Requestor will fill out the form, providing details of the transaction. The form will be reviewed and signed off by the Controller or EVP of Finance. The person performing the transaction in G5 will sign, attached all the appropriate back-up and file in a designated area for future reference. Name(s) of Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: Karen Stellpflug, Controller and David Ansell, Assistant Vice President for Finance Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2026
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended May 31, 2025 Finding 2025-001 Criteria: Title IV regulations (34 CFR 668.22) require the University to return the unearned portion of grants or loans to the Title IV program within 45 days after a student withdraws. Addit...
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended May 31, 2025 Finding 2025-001 Criteria: Title IV regulations (34 CFR 668.22) require the University to return the unearned portion of grants or loans to the Title IV program within 45 days after a student withdraws. Additionally, The U.S. Department of Education (ED) requires that an institution must ensure that its administrative procedures for the FSA programs include an adequate system of internal controls or checks and balances to ensure compliance with FSA laws and regulations including the return of Title IV funds. Condition/Context: The federal aid refunds for 1 out of 8 of the students tested was not calculated correctly and subsequently, not returned within 45 days from the withdrawal date. The sample was not statistically valid. Also, the auditor noted that the University did not have evidence or documentation available to support the control/review process for return of Title IV calculations. Cause: The University's review procedures for the return of Title IV funds were not followed and the system was not programmed to ensure the correct withdrawal date was used in the calculation of the return of Title IV funds. Effect: The University was in possession of funds belonging to the federal government longer than allowed and could have incorrect return of Title IV calculations and return incorrect amounts to students and/or the ED. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should adhere to its procedures for refunding awards and implement a more formal documented review process/control to ensure refunds are calculated correctly and timely and any returns are made within the required timeframe. Management Response: The University agrees with this finding. The JFA R2T4 calculation incorrectly populated the wrong date used to perform the calculation, thus causing the error. The error was corrected and the director performs the R2T4 and is working to have a back-up employee trained. Staffing levels will have to be brought up to allow for new financial aid staff to complete this task. Corrective Action Plan Corrective Action Planned: To ensure accuracy, the withdrawal date generated in the JFA calculation will be cross-referenced against the J1 SIS record. Once verified, this date will be documented alongside the R2T4 calculation. This process guarantees that the student's period of attendance is calculated using the correct data. Name(s) of Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: Holly Weberg, Director of Financial Aid and new hire designee. Anticipated Completion Date: The director is still fulfilling the R2T4 duties until a new hire candidate is hired and trained.
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended May 31, 2025 Finding 2025-002 Criteria: Title IV regulations (34 CFR 685.309(b)) require that upon receipt of an enrollment report from the Secretary, institutions must update all information included in the report and re...
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended May 31, 2025 Finding 2025-002 Criteria: Title IV regulations (34 CFR 685.309(b)) require that upon receipt of an enrollment report from the Secretary, institutions must update all information included in the report and return the report to the Secretary: (i) in the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary; and (ii) within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary. Unless it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, an institution must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the institution discovers that: (i) a loan under Title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the institution, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or (ii) a student who is enrolled at the institution and who received a loan under Title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. Condition/Context: The change in student status for 8 of 26 students tested was not reported to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) within 30 days or included in a response to a roster file within 60 days. The student status for 1 of 26 students tested was reported as a withdrawal although the student was on a leave of absence. In addition, for 7 of 26 students tested, the University was unable to provide sufficient support for the status change. The sample was not statistically valid. Cause: The University’s procedures for reporting all students was not designed appropriately in order to allow for timely reporting to the NSLDS. Effect: The accuracy of Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by institutions. If an institution does not review, update and verify student enrollment statuses, effective dates of the enrollment status and the anticipated completion dates, then the Title IV student loan records will be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should revise its procedures to ensure accurate enrollment information is sent to the NSLDS within the required timeframe. Management Response: The University agrees with this finding. The University has been actively taking measures with the new student information system, Jenzabar, and procedures have been standardized across the University. An audit will be preformed to discover the inefficiencies. Corrective Action Plan Corrective Action Planned: The Registrar Office will submit the names of students to the Audit Resource team at NSC so they can research why these students were not reported to NSLDS. As a result of their response, we will meet with the financial aid team to determine the next course of action to audit files. Any changes needed for NSC reporting will be implemented in May 2026 new submission. The University will also work with the system provider to rectify these discrepancies systematically to avoid further conflicts. Name(s) of Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: Alison Block, Director of Academic Records and Systems and Holly Weberg, Director of Financial Aid. Anticipated Completion Date: Tentative completion date May 2026.
Finding 2025-002: U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, National Institutes for Health Research and Development Cluster, Cancer Control, Assistance Listing #93.399; Lack Inadequate Documentation and Lack of Independent Review of Expenditures Corrective Action: We agree with the recommendation...
Finding 2025-002: U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, National Institutes for Health Research and Development Cluster, Cancer Control, Assistance Listing #93.399; Lack Inadequate Documentation and Lack of Independent Review of Expenditures Corrective Action: We agree with the recommendation. We do currently require complete supporting documentation for all expenditures. MCC has updated the Financial Process Procedure to include language related to receipt management, and allowable and disallowed grant expenses. MCC has created a Travel Reimbursement Procedure that addresses approval of Director expenses. Timeline: This was implemented on December 1, 2025. Responsible Parties: MCC Director, Principal Investigators
Finding 2025-001: U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, National Institutes for Health Research and Development Cluster, Cancer Control, Assistance Listing #93.399; Lack of Required Written Policies Corrective Action: We agree with the recommendation. We do currently require complete supporti...
Finding 2025-001: U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, National Institutes for Health Research and Development Cluster, Cancer Control, Assistance Listing #93.399; Lack of Required Written Policies Corrective Action: We agree with the recommendation. We do currently require complete supporting documentation for all expenditures. Montana Cancer Consortium (MCC) has updated the Financial Process Procedure to include language related to receipt management, allowable and disallowed grant expenses, and timing of payment requests. Timeline: This was implemented on December 1, 2025. Responsible Parties: MCC Director, Principal Investigators
We concur with the auditor’s findings. The Organization will develop written procedures for preparing, certifying, and submitting annual federal financial reports, including deadlines and responsible staff.
We concur with the auditor’s findings. The Organization will develop written procedures for preparing, certifying, and submitting annual federal financial reports, including deadlines and responsible staff.
The University identified certain automated COD communication and reporting rules in the Student Information System (SIS) that were not functioning properly during the 2024-2025 aid year. The breakdown of these automated rules required manual interventions to have all Pell Grant disbursements and R2...
The University identified certain automated COD communication and reporting rules in the Student Information System (SIS) that were not functioning properly during the 2024-2025 aid year. The breakdown of these automated rules required manual interventions to have all Pell Grant disbursements and R2T4 adjustments reported to COD, in certain cases exceeding the 15-day requirement. The University has re-trained all financial aid staff to ensure the export process to COD is now completed after each R2T4 adjustment calculation. In addition, the financial aid office now has a dedicated employee running this process at minimum twice a week to ensure that all Pell records get successfully captured and reported to COD within the 15 day window.
« 1 362 363 365 366 2417 »